mirror of
https://github.com/HackSoftware/Django-Styleguide.git
synced 2024-11-22 17:46:38 +03:00
Add several paragraphs for more complex Celery scenarios
This commit is contained in:
parent
94ea1e92a8
commit
b9c741b15a
11
README.md
11
README.md
|
@ -961,9 +961,18 @@ from project.app.services import some_service_name as service
|
|||
def some_service_name(*args, **kwargs):
|
||||
service(*args, **kwargs)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
This is a task, having the same name as a service, which holds the actual business logic.
|
||||
|
||||
**Of course, we can have more complex cituations**, like a chain or chord of tasks, each of them doing different domain relateed logic. In that case, it's hard to isolate everything in a service, because we now have dependencies between the tasks.
|
||||
|
||||
If that happens, we try to expose an interface to our domain & let the tasks work with that interface.
|
||||
|
||||
One can argue that having an ORM object is an interface by itself, and that's true. Sometimes, you can just update your object from a task & that's OK.
|
||||
|
||||
But there are times where you need to be strict and don't let tasks do database calls straight from the ORM, but rather, via an exposed interface for that.
|
||||
|
||||
**More complex scenarios depend on their context. Make sure you are aware of the architecture & the decisions you are making.**
|
||||
|
||||
### Structure
|
||||
|
||||
#### Configuration
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user