mirror of
https://github.com/HackSoftware/Django-Styleguide.git
synced 2024-11-25 11:03:46 +03:00
Fixed minor errors in README.md
This commit is contained in:
parent
e16f3a0fc8
commit
efa43dcdde
58
README.md
58
README.md
|
@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ Few things to spot here.
|
|||
**Custom validation:**
|
||||
|
||||
* There's a custom model validation, defined in `clean()`. This validation uses only model fields and spans no relations.
|
||||
* This requires someone to call `full_clean()` on the model instance. The best place to do that is in the `save()` method of the model. Otherwise people can forget to call `full_clean()` in the respective service.
|
||||
* This requires someone to call `full_clean()` on the model instance. The best place to do that is in the `save()` method of the model. Otherwise, people can forget to call `full_clean()` in the respective service.
|
||||
|
||||
**Properties:**
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ We have few general rules for custom validations & model properties / methods:
|
|||
* If the custom validation depends only on the **non-relational model fields**, define it in `clean` and call `full_clean` in `save`.
|
||||
* If the custom validation is more complex & **spans relationships**, do it in the service that creates the model.
|
||||
* It's OK to combine both `clean` and additional validation in the `service`.
|
||||
* As proposed in [this issue](https://github.com/HackSoftware/Django-Styleguide/issues/22), if you can do a validation using [Django's constraints](https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/2.2/ref/models/constraints/), then you should aim for that. Less code to write.
|
||||
* As proposed in [this issue](https://github.com/HackSoftware/Django-Styleguide/issues/22), if you can do validation using [Django's constraints](https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/2.2/ref/models/constraints/), then you should aim for that. Less code to write.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Properties
|
||||
|
@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ A service is a simple function that:
|
|||
* Works mostly with models & other services and selectors
|
||||
* Does business logic - from simple model creation to complex cross-cutting concerns, to calling external services & tasks.
|
||||
|
||||
An example service that creates an user:
|
||||
An example service that creates a user:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
def create_user(
|
||||
|
@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ As you can see, this service calls 2 other services - `create_profile` and `send
|
|||
|
||||
### Naming convention
|
||||
|
||||
Naming conventions depend on your taste. It pays off to have a consistent naming convention through out a project.
|
||||
Naming conventions depend on your taste. It pays off to have a consistent naming convention throughout a project.
|
||||
|
||||
If we take the example above, our service is named `create_user`. The pattern is - `<action>_<entity>`.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ As you can see, `get_visible_users_for` is another selector.
|
|||
|
||||
### Naming convention
|
||||
|
||||
Read the section in services. Same rules apply here.
|
||||
Read the section in services. The same rules apply here.
|
||||
|
||||
## APIs & Serializers
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ Keep in mind this API is public by default. Authentication is up to you.
|
|||
|
||||
#### Filters + Pagination
|
||||
|
||||
On first glance, this is tricky, since our APIs are inheriting the plain `APIView` from DRF, while filtering and pagination is baked into the generic ones:
|
||||
At first glance, this is tricky, since our APIs are inheriting the plain `APIView` from DRF, while filtering and pagination are baked into the generic ones:
|
||||
|
||||
1. [DRF Filtering](https://www.django-rest-framework.org/api-guide/filtering/)
|
||||
1. [DRF Pagination](https://www.django-rest-framework.org/api-guide/pagination/)
|
||||
|
@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ That's why, we take the following approach:
|
|||
1. APIs take care of filter parameter serialization.
|
||||
1. APIs take care of pagination.
|
||||
|
||||
Lets see an example:
|
||||
Let's look at the example:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
from rest_framework.views import APIView
|
||||
|
@ -477,13 +477,13 @@ class UserListApi(ApiErrorsMixin, APIView):
|
|||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
When we look at the API, we can idenfity few things:
|
||||
When we look at the API, we can identify few things:
|
||||
|
||||
1. There's a `FilterSerializer`, which will take care of the query parameters. If we don't do this here, we'll have to do it elsewhere & DRF serializers are great at this job.
|
||||
1. We pass the filters to the `user_list` selector
|
||||
1. We use the `get_paginated_response` utility, to return a .. paginated response.
|
||||
|
||||
Now, lets look at the selector:
|
||||
Now, let's look at the selector:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
import django_filters
|
||||
|
@ -511,7 +511,7 @@ But you can do whatever suits you best here. We have projects, where we implemen
|
|||
|
||||
The key thing is - **selectors take care of filtering**.
|
||||
|
||||
Finally, lets look at `get_paginated_response`:
|
||||
Finally, let's look at `get_paginated_response`:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
from rest_framework.response import Response
|
||||
|
@ -687,9 +687,9 @@ urlpatterns = [
|
|||
|
||||
### Raising Exceptions in Services / Selectors
|
||||
|
||||
Now we have separation between our HTTP interface & the core logic of our application.
|
||||
Now we have a separation between our HTTP interface & the core logic of our application.
|
||||
|
||||
In order to keep this separation of concerns, our services and selectors must not use the `rest_framework.exception` classes because they are bounded with HTTP status codes.
|
||||
To keep this separation of concerns, our services and selectors must not use the `rest_framework.exception` classes because they are bounded with HTTP status codes.
|
||||
|
||||
Our services and selectors must use one of:
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -714,11 +714,11 @@ def create_topic(*, name: str, course: Course) -> Topic:
|
|||
|
||||
### Handle Exceptions in APIs
|
||||
|
||||
In order to transform the exceptions raised in the services or selectors, to a standard HTTP response, you need to catch the exception and raise something that the rest framework understands.
|
||||
To transform the exceptions raised in the services or selectors, to a standard HTTP response, you need to catch the exception and raise something that the rest framework understands.
|
||||
|
||||
The best place to do this is in the `handle_exception` method of the `APIView`. There you can map your Python/Django exception to a DRF exception.
|
||||
|
||||
By default, the [`handle_exception` method implementation in DRF](https://www.django-rest-framework.org/api-guide/exceptions/#exception-handling-in-rest-framework-views) handles the Django's built-in `Http404` and `PermissionDenied` exceptions, thus there is no need for you to handle it by hand.
|
||||
By default, the [`handle_exception` method implementation in DRF](https://www.django-rest-framework.org/api-guide/exceptions/#exception-handling-in-rest-framework-views) handles Django's built-in `Http404` and `PermissionDenied` exceptions, thus there is no need for you to handle it by hand.
|
||||
|
||||
Here is an example:
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -832,11 +832,11 @@ class CourseCreateApi(
|
|||
return Response(status=status.HTTP_201_CREATED)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
All of code above can be found in `utils.py` in this repository.
|
||||
All of the code above can be found in `utils.py` in this repository.
|
||||
|
||||
### Error formatting
|
||||
|
||||
Next step is to generalize the format of the errors we get from our APIs. This will ease the process of displaying errors to the end user, via JavaScript.
|
||||
The next step is to generalize the format of the errors we get from our APIs. This will ease the process of displaying errors to the end-user, via JavaScript.
|
||||
|
||||
If we have a standard serializer and there is an error with one of the fields, the message we get by default looks like this:
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -887,7 +887,7 @@ In our projects, we format the errors like that:
|
|||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
If we raise a `ValidationError`, then field is optional.
|
||||
If we raise a `ValidationError`, then the field is optional.
|
||||
|
||||
In order to achieve that, we implement a custom exception handler:
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -898,7 +898,7 @@ from rest_framework.views import exception_handler
|
|||
def exception_errors_format_handler(exc, context):
|
||||
response = exception_handler(exc, context)
|
||||
|
||||
# If unexpected error occurs (server error, etc.)
|
||||
# If an unexpected error occurs (server error, etc.)
|
||||
if response is None:
|
||||
return response
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -953,9 +953,9 @@ project_name
|
|||
We follow 2 general naming conventions:
|
||||
|
||||
* The test file names should be `test_the_name_of_the_thing_that_is_tested.py`
|
||||
* The test case shoud be `class TheNameOfTheThingThatIsTestedTests(TestCase):`
|
||||
* The test case should be `class TheNameOfTheThingThatIsTestedTests(TestCase):`
|
||||
|
||||
For example if we have:
|
||||
For example, if we have:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
def a_very_neat_service(*args, **kwargs):
|
||||
|
@ -975,7 +975,7 @@ class AVeryNeatServiceTests(TestCase):
|
|||
pass
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
For tests of utility functions, we follow a similiar pattern.
|
||||
For tests of utility functions, we follow a similar pattern.
|
||||
|
||||
For example, if we have `project_name/common/utils.py`, then we are going to have `project_name/common/tests/test_utils.py` and place different test cases in that file.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -984,7 +984,7 @@ If we are to split the `utils.py` module into submodules, the same will happen f
|
|||
* `project_name/common/utils/files.py`
|
||||
* `project_name/common/tests/utils/test_files.py`
|
||||
|
||||
We try to match the stucture of our modules with the structure of their respective tests.
|
||||
We try to match the structure of our modules with the structure of their respective tests.
|
||||
|
||||
### Example
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1106,7 +1106,7 @@ When creating the required state for a given test, one can use a combination of:
|
|||
* Factories (We recommend using [`factory_boy`](https://factoryboy.readthedocs.io/en/latest/orms.html))
|
||||
* Plain `Model.objects.create()` calls, if factories are not yet introduced in the project.
|
||||
|
||||
**Lets take a look at our service from the example:**
|
||||
**Let's take a look at our service from the example:**
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
from django.contrib.auth.models import User
|
||||
|
@ -1201,7 +1201,7 @@ Testing selectors is also an important part of every project.
|
|||
|
||||
Sometimes, the selectors can be really straightforward, and if we have to "cut corners", we can omit those tests. But it the end, it's important to cover our selectors too.
|
||||
|
||||
Lets take another look at our example selector:
|
||||
Let's take another look at our example selector:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
from django.contrib.auth.models import User
|
||||
|
@ -1352,7 +1352,7 @@ def debug_task(self):
|
|||
|
||||
#### Tasks
|
||||
|
||||
Tasks are located in in `tasks.py` modules in different apps.
|
||||
Tasks are located in `tasks.py` modules in different apps.
|
||||
|
||||
We follow the same rules as with everything else (APIs, services, selectors): **if the tasks for a given app grow too big, split them by domain.**
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1362,7 +1362,7 @@ The general rule of thumb is - split your tasks in a way that'll make sense to y
|
|||
|
||||
#### Circular imports between tasks & services
|
||||
|
||||
In some cases, you need invoke a task from a service or vice-versa:
|
||||
In some cases, you need to invoke a task from a service or vice-versa:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# project/app/services.py
|
||||
|
@ -1425,7 +1425,7 @@ def task_function_2():
|
|||
|
||||
### Periodic Tasks
|
||||
|
||||
Managing periodic tasks is quite important, especially when you have tens, or hundreds of them.
|
||||
Managing periodic tasks is quite important, especially when you have tens or hundreds of them.
|
||||
|
||||
We use [Celery Beat](https://docs.celeryproject.org/en/latest/userguide/periodic-tasks.html) + `django_celery_beat.schedulers:DatabaseScheduler` + [`django-celery-beat`](https://github.com/celery/django-celery-beat) for our periodic tasks.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1493,7 +1493,7 @@ class Command(BaseCommand):
|
|||
Few key things:
|
||||
|
||||
* We use this task as part of a deploy procedure.
|
||||
* We always put a link to [`crontab.guru`](https://crontab.guru) to explain the cron. Otherwhise it's unreadable.
|
||||
* We always put a link to [`crontab.guru`](https://crontab.guru) to explain the cron. Otherwise it's unreadable.
|
||||
* Everything is in one place.
|
||||
|
||||
### Configuration
|
||||
|
@ -1510,7 +1510,7 @@ About type annotations & using `mypy`, [this tweet](https://twitter.com/querouma
|
|||
|
||||
We have projects where we enforce `mypy` on CI and are very strict with types.
|
||||
|
||||
We have projects where types are more loose.
|
||||
We have projects where types are looser.
|
||||
|
||||
Context is king here.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user