mirror of
				https://github.com/HackSoftware/Django-Styleguide.git
				synced 2025-10-31 07:37:25 +03:00 
			
		
		
		
	Reword some of the paragraphs
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									702ca6d287
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						fcb1a30ca5
					
				
							
								
								
									
										10
									
								
								README.md
									
									
									
									
									
								
							
							
						
						
									
										10
									
								
								README.md
									
									
									
									
									
								
							|  | @ -112,9 +112,9 @@ Relying on generic APIs / Views, with the combination of serializers & forms doe | |||
| 1. Fragments the business logic in multiple places, making it really hard to trace the data flow. | ||||
| 2. Hides things from you. In order to change something, you need to know the inner-workings of the abstraction that you are using. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| Generic APIs & Views, in combination with serializers & forms is really great for the straight-forward "CRUD over a model" case. | ||||
| Generic APIs & Views, in combination with serializers & forms, is really great for the straightforward "CRUD for a model" case. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| From our experience so far, this straightforwad case rarely happens. And once you leave the happy CRUD path, things start to get messy. | ||||
| From our experience, so far, this straightforward case rarely happens. **And once you leave the happy CRUD path, things start to get messy.** | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| And once things start to get messy, you need more "boxes", to organize your code in a better way. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|  | @ -138,11 +138,11 @@ But trying to place all of your business logic in a custom manager is not a grea | |||
| 
 | ||||
| **The idea is to let your domain live separately, from your data model & API layer.** | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| If we take the idea for having custom managers and combine that with the idea of letting the domain live saparetely, we'll end up with what we call a "service layer". | ||||
| If we take the idea for having custom queryset/managers and combine that with the idea of letting the domain live saparetely, we'll end up with what we call a "service layer". | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| Services can be functions, classes, modules or whatever makes sense for your particular case. | ||||
| **Services can be functions, classes, modules or whatever makes sense for your particular case.** | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| With all that in mind, custom managers & querysets are very powerful tool and should be used. | ||||
| With all that in mind, custom managers & querysets are very powerful tool and should be used to expose better interfaces for your models. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| --- | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|  |  | |||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user