Django Styleguide

Django styleguide used in HackSoft projects.

Expect often updates as we discuss & decide upon different things.

Table of contents:

• Overview
• Cookie Cutter
• Models
  • Custom validation
  • Properties
  • Methods
  • Testing
• Services
  • Naming convention
• Selectors
  • Naming convention
• APIs & Serializers
  • Naming convention
  • An example list API
  • An example detail API
  • An example create API
  • An example update API
  • Nested serializers
• Urls
• Exception Handling
  • Raising Exceptions in Services / Selectors
  • Handle Exceptions in APIs
  • Error formatting
• Testing
  • Naming conventions
  • Example
    • Example models
    • Example selectors
    • Example services
  • Testing services
  • Testing selectors
• Celery
  • Structure
    • Configuration
    • Tasks
  • Periodic Tasks
  • Configuration
• Inspiration

Overview

In Django, business logic should live in:

• Model properties (with some exceptions).
• Model clean method for additional validations (with some exceptions).
• Services - functions, that take care of writing to the database.
• Selectors - functions, that take care of fetching from the database.

In Django, business logic should not live in:

• APIs and Views.
• Serializers and Forms.
• Form tags.
• Model save method.

Model properties vs selectors:

• If the model property spans multiple relations, it should better be a selector.
• If a model property, added to some list API, will cause N + 1 problem that cannot be easily solved with select_related, it should better be a selector.

Cookie Cutter

We recommend starting every new project with some kind of cookiecutter. Having the proper structure from the start pays off.

For example, you can use cookiecutter-django

Models

Lets take a look at an example model:

class Course(models.Model):
    name = models.CharField(unique=True, max_length=255)

    start_date = models.DateField()
    end_date = models.DateField()

    attendable = models.BooleanField(default=True)

    students = models.ManyToManyField(
        Student,
        through='CourseAssignment',
        through_fields=('course', 'student')
    )

    teachers = models.ManyToManyField(
        Teacher,
        through='CourseAssignment',
        through_fields=('course', 'teacher')
    )

    slug_url = models.SlugField(unique=True)

    repository = models.URLField(blank=True)
    video_channel = models.URLField(blank=True, null=True)
    facebook_group = models.URLField(blank=True, null=True)

    logo = models.ImageField(blank=True, null=True)

    public = models.BooleanField(default=True)

    generate_certificates_delta = models.DurationField(default=timedelta(days=15))

    objects = CourseManager()

    def clean(self):
        if self.start_date > self.end_date:
            raise ValidationError("End date cannot be before start date!")

    def save(self, *args, **kwargs):
        self.full_clean()
        return super().save(*args, **kwargs)

    @property
    def visible_teachers(self):
        return self.teachers.filter(course_assignments__hidden=False).select_related('profile')

    @property
    def duration_in_weeks(self):
        weeks = rrule.rrule(
            rrule.WEEKLY,
            dtstart=self.start_date,
            until=self.end_date
        )
        return weeks.count()

    @property
    def has_started(self):
        now = get_now()

        return self.start_date <= now.date()

    @property
    def has_finished(self):
        now = get_now()

        return self.end_date <= now.date()

    @property
    def can_generate_certificates(self):
        now = get_now()

        return now.date() <= self.end_date + self.generate_certificates_delta

    def __str__(self) -> str:
        return self.name

Few things to spot here.

Custom validation:

• There's a custom model validation, defined in clean(). This validation uses only model fields and spans no relations.
• This requires someone to call full_clean() on the model instance. The best place to do that is in the save() method of the model. Otherwise people can forget to call full_clean() in the respective service.

Properties:

• All properties, except visible_teachers, work directly on model fields.
• visible_teachers is a great candidate for a selector.

We have few general rules for custom validations & model properties / methods:

Custom validation

• If the custom validation depends only on the non-relational model fields, define it in clean and call full_clean in save.
• If the custom validation is more complex & spans relationships, do it in the service that creates the model.
• It's OK to combine both clean and additional validation in the service.
• As proposed in this issue, if you can do a validation using Django's constraints, then you should aim for that. Less code to write.

Properties

• If your model properties use only non-relational model fields, they are OK to stay as properties.
• If a property, such as visible_teachers starts spanning relationships, it's better to define a selector for that.

Methods

• If you need a method that updates several fields at once (for example - created_at and created_by when something happens), you can create a model method that does the job.
• Every model method should be wrapped in a service. There should be no model method calling outside a service.

Testing

Models need to be tested only if there's something additional to them - like custom validation or properties.

If we are strict & don't do custom validation / properties, then we can test the models without actually writing anything to the database => we are going to get quicker tests.

For example, if we want to test the custom validation, here's how a test could look like:

from datetime import timedelta

from django.test import TestCase
from django.core.exceptions import ValidationError

from project.common.utils import get_now

from project.education.factories import CourseFactory
from project.education.models import Course


class CourseTests(TestCase):
    def test_course_end_date_cannot_be_before_start_date(self):
        start_date = get_now()
        end_date = get_now() - timedelta(days=1)

        course_data = CourseFactory.build()
        course_data['start_date'] = start_date
        course_data['end_date'] = end_date

        course = Course(**course_data)

        with self.assertRaises(ValidationError):
            course.full_clean()

There's a lot going on in this test:

• get_now() returns a timezone aware datetime.
• CourseFactory.build() will return a dictionary with all required fields for a course to exist.
• We replace the values for start_date and end_date.
• We assert that a validation error is going to be raised if we call full_clean.
• We are not hitting the database at all, since there's no need for that.

Here's how CourseFactory looks like:

class CourseFactory(factory.DjangoModelFactory):
    name = factory.Sequence(lambda n: f'{n}{faker.word()}')
    start_date = factory.LazyAttribute(
        lambda _: get_now()
    )
    end_date = factory.LazyAttribute(
        lambda _: get_now() + timedelta(days=30)
    )

    slug_url = factory.Sequence(lambda n: f'{n}{faker.slug()}')

    repository = factory.LazyAttribute(lambda _: faker.url())
    video_channel = factory.LazyAttribute(lambda _: faker.url())
    facebook_group = factory.LazyAttribute(lambda _: faker.url())

    class Meta:
        model = Course

    @classmethod
    def _build(cls, model_class, *args, **kwargs):
        return kwargs

    @classmethod
    def _create(cls, model_class, *args, **kwargs):
        return create_course(**kwargs)

Services

A service is a simple function that:

• Lives in your_app/services.py module
• Takes keyword-only arguments
• Is type-annotated (even if you are not using mypy at the moment)
• Works mostly with models & other services and selectors
• Does business logic - from simple model creation to complex cross-cutting concerns, to calling external services & tasks.

An example service that creates an user:

def create_user(
    *,
    email: str,
    name: str
) -> User:
    user = User(email=email)
    user.full_clean()
    user.save()

    create_profile(user=user, name=name)
    send_confirmation_email(user=user)

    return user

As you can see, this service calls 2 other services - create_profile and send_confirmation_email

Naming convention

Naming conventions depend on your taste. It pays off to have a consistent naming convention through out a project.

If we take the example above, our service is named create_user. The pattern is - <action>_<entity>.

What we usually prefer in our projects, again, depending on taste, is <entity>_<action> or with the example above: user_create. This seems odd at first, but it has few nice features:

• Namespacing. It's easy to spot all services starting with user_ and it's a good idea to put them in a users.py module.
• Greppability. Or in other words, if you want to see all actions for a specific entity, just grep for user_.

A full example would look like this:

def user_create(
    *,
    email: str,
    name: str
) -> User:
    user = User(email=email)
    user.full_clean()
    user.save()

    profile_create(user=user, name=name)
    confirmation_email_send(user=user)

    return user

Selectors

A selector is a simple function that:

• Lives in your_app/selectors.py module
• Takes keyword-only arguments
• Is type-annotated (even if you are not using mypy at the moment)
• Works mostly with models & other services and selectors
• Does business logic around fetching data from your database

An example selector that lists users from the database:

def get_users(*, fetched_by: User) -> Iterable[User]:
    user_ids = get_visible_users_for(user=fetched_by)

    query = Q(id__in=user_ids)

    return User.objects.filter(query)

As you can see, get_visible_users_for is another selector.

Naming convention

Read the section in services. Same rules apply here.

APIs & Serializers

When using services & selectors, all of your APIs should look simple & identical.

General rules for an API is:

• Do 1 API per operation. For CRUD on a model, this means 4 APIs.
• Use the most simple APIView or GenericAPIView
• Use services / selectors & don't do business logic in your API.
• Use serializers for fetching objects from params - passed either via GET or POST
• Serializer should be nested in the API and be named either InputSerializer or OutputSerializer
  • OutputSerializer can subclass ModelSerializer, if needed.
  • InputSerializer should always be a plain Serializer
  • Reuse serializers as little as possible
  • If you need a nested serializer, use the inline_serializer util

Naming convention

For our APIs we use the following naming convention: <Entity><Action>Api.

Here are few examples: UserCreateApi, UserSendResetPasswordApi, UserDeactivateApi, etc.

An example list API

class CourseListApi(SomeAuthenticationMixin, APIView):
    class OutputSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
        class Meta:
            model = Course
            fields = ('id', 'name', 'start_date', 'end_date')

    def get(self, request):
        courses = get_courses()

        serializer = self.OutputSerializer(courses, many=True)

        return Response(serializer.data)

An example detail API

class CourseDetailApi(SomeAuthenticationMixin, APIView):
    class OutputSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
        class Meta:
            model = Course
            fields = ('id', 'name', 'start_date', 'end_date')

    def get(self, request, course_id):
        course = get_course(id=course_id)

        serializer = self.OutputSerializer(course)

        return Response(serializer.data)

An example create API

class CourseCreateApi(SomeAuthenticationMixin, APIView):
    class InputSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
        name = serializers.CharField()
        start_date = serializers.DateField()
        end_date = serializers.DateField()

    def post(self, request):
        serializer = self.InputSerializer(data=request.data)
        serializer.is_valid(raise_exception=True)

        create_course(**serializer.validated_data)

        return Response(status=status.HTTP_201_CREATED)

An example update API

class CourseUpdateApi(SomeAuthenticationMixin, APIView):
    class InputSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
        name = serializers.CharField(required=False)
        start_date = serializers.DateField(required=False)
        end_date = serializers.DateField(required=False)

    def post(self, request, course_id):
        serializer = self.InputSerializer(data=request.data)
        serializer.is_valid(raise_exception=True)

        update_course(course_id=course_id, **serializer.validated_data)

        return Response(status=status.HTTP_200_OK)

Nested serializers

In case you need to use a nested serializer, you can do the following thing:

class Serializer(serializers.Serializer):
    weeks = inline_serializer(many=True, fields={
        'id': serializers.IntegerField(),
        'number': serializers.IntegerField(),
    })

The implementation of inline_serializer can be found in utils.py in this repo.

Urls

We usually organize our urls the same way we organize our APIs - 1 url per API, meaning 1 url per action.

A general rule of thumb is to split urls from different domains in their own domain_patterns list & include from urlpatterns.

Here's an example with the APIs from above:

from django.urls import path, include

from project.education.apis import (
    CourseCreateApi,
    CourseUpdateApi,
    CourseListApi,
    CourseDetailApi,
    CourseSpecificActionApi,
)


course_patterns = [
    path('', CourseListApi.as_view(), name='list'),
    path('<int:course_id>/', CourseDetailApi.as_view(), name='detail'),
    path('create/', CourseCreateApi.as_view(), name='create'),
    path('<int:course_id>/update/', CourseUpdateApi.as_view(), name='update'),
    path(
        '<int:course_id>/specific-action/',
        CourseSpecificActionApi.as_view(),
        name='specific-action'
    ),
]

urlpatterns = [
    path('courses/', include((course_patterns, 'courses'))),
]

Splitting urls like that can give you the extra flexibility to move separate domain patterns to separate modules, especially for really big projects, where you'll often have merge conflicts in urls.py.

Exception Handling

Raising Exceptions in Services / Selectors

Now we have separation between our HTTP interface & the core logic of our application.

In order to keep this separation of concerns, our services and selectors must not use the rest_framework.exception classes because they are bounded with HTTP status codes.

Our services and selectors must use one of:

• Python built-in exceptions
• Exceptions from django.core.exceptions
• Custom exceptions, inheriting from the ones above.

Here is a good example of service that performs some validation and raises django.core.exceptions.ValidationError:

from django.core.exceptions import ValidationError


def create_topic(*, name: str, course: Course) -> Topic:
    if course.end_date < timezone.now():
       raise ValidationError('You can not create topics for course that has ended.')

    topic = Topic.objects.create(name=name, course=course)

    return topic

Handle Exceptions in APIs

In order to transform the exceptions raised in the services or selectors, to a standard HTTP response, you need to catch the exception and raise something that the rest framework understands.

The best place to do this is in the handle_exception method of the APIView. There you can map your Python/Django exception to a DRF exception.

By default, the handle_exception method implementation in DRF handles the Django's built-in Http404 and PermissionDenied exceptions, thus there is no need for you to handle it by hand.

Here is an example:

from rest_framework import exceptions as rest_exceptions

from django.core.exceptions import ValidationError


class CourseCreateApi(SomeAuthenticationMixin, APIView):
    expected_exceptions = {
        ValidationError: rest_exceptions.ValidationError
    }

    class InputSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
        ...

    def post(self, request):
        serializer = self.InputSerializer(data=request.data)
        serializer.is_valid(raise_exception=True)

        create_course(**serializer.validated_data)

        return Response(status=status.HTTP_201_CREATED)

    def handle_exception(self, exc):
        if isinstance(exc, tuple(self.expected_exceptions.keys())):
            drf_exception_class = self.expected_exceptions[exc.__class__]
            drf_exception = drf_exception_class(get_error_message(exc))

            return super().handle_exception(drf_exception)

        return super().handle_exception(exc)

Here's the implementation of get_error_message:

def get_first_matching_attr(obj, *attrs, default=None):
    for attr in attrs:
        if hasattr(obj, attr):
            return getattr(obj, attr)

    return default


def get_error_message(exc):
    if hasattr(exc, 'message_dict'):
        return exc.message_dict
    error_msg = get_first_matching_attr(exc, 'message', 'messages')

    if isinstance(error_msg, list):
        error_msg = ', '.join(error_msg)

    if error_msg is None:
        error_msg = str(exc)

    return error_msg

You can move this code to a mixin and use it in every API to prevent code duplication.

We call this ApiErrorsMixin. Here's a sample implementation from one of our projects:

from rest_framework import exceptions as rest_exceptions

from django.core.exceptions import ValidationError

from project.common.utils import get_error_message


class ApiErrorsMixin:
    """
    Mixin that transforms Django and Python exceptions into rest_framework ones.
    Without the mixin, they return 500 status code which is not desired.
    """
    expected_exceptions = {
        ValueError: rest_exceptions.ValidationError,
        ValidationError: rest_exceptions.ValidationError,
        PermissionError: rest_exceptions.PermissionDenied
    }

    def handle_exception(self, exc):
        if isinstance(exc, tuple(self.expected_exceptions.keys())):
            drf_exception_class = self.expected_exceptions[exc.__class__]
            drf_exception = drf_exception_class(get_error_message(exc))

            return super().handle_exception(drf_exception)

        return super().handle_exception(exc)

Having this mixin in mind, our API can be written like that:

class CourseCreateApi(
    SomeAuthenticationMixin,
    ApiErrorsMixin,
    APIView
):
    class InputSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
        ...

    def post(self, request):
        serializer = self.InputSerializer(data=request.data)
        serializer.is_valid(raise_exception=True)

        create_course(**serializer.validated_data)

        return Response(status=status.HTTP_201_CREATED)

All of code above can be found in utils.py in this repository.

Error formatting

Next step is to generalize the format of the errors we get from our APIs. This will ease the process of displaying errors to the end user, via JavaScript.

If we have a standard serializer and there is an error with one of the fields, the message we get by default looks like this:

{
    "url": [
        "This field is required."
    ]
}

If we have a validation error with just a message - raise ValidationError('Something is wrong.') - it will look like this:

[
    "some error"
]

Another error format may look like this:

{
    "detail": "Method \"GET\" not allowed."
}

Those are 3 different ways of formatting for our errors. What we want to have is a single format, for all errors.

Luckily, DRF provides a way for us to give our own custom exception handler, where we can implement the desired formatting: https://www.django-rest-framework.org/api-guide/exceptions/#custom-exception-handling

In our projects, we format the errors like that:

{
  "errors": [
    {
      "message": "Error message",
      "code": "Some code",
      "field": "field_name"
    },
    {
      "message": "Error message",
      "code": "Some code",
      "field": "nested.field_name"
    },
    ]
}

If we raise a ValidationError, then field is optional.

In order to acheive that, we implement a custom exception handler:

from rest_framework.views import exception_handler


def exception_errors_format_handler(exc, context):
    response = exception_handler(exc, context)

    # If unexpected error occurs (server error, etc.)
    if response is None:
        return response

    formatter = ErrorsFormatter(exc)

    response.data = formatter()

    return response

which needs to be added to the REST_FRAMEWORK project settings:

REST_FRAMEWORK = {
    'EXCEPTION_HANDLER': 'project.app.handlers.exception_errors_format_handler',
    ...
}

The magic happens in the ErrorsFormatter class. The implementation of that class can be found in the utils.py file, located in that repo.

Combining ApiErrorsMixin, the custom exception handler & the errors formatter class, we can have predictable behavior in our APIs, when it comes to errors.

Testing

In our Django projects, we split our tests depending on the type of code they represent.

Meaning, we generally have tests for models, services, selectors & APIs / views.

The file structure usually looks like this:

project_name
├── app_name
│   ├── __init__.py
│   └── tests
│       ├── __init__.py
│       ├── models
│       │   └── __init__.py
│       │   └── test_some_model_name.py
│       ├── selectors
│       │   └── __init__.py
│       │   └── test_some_selector_name.py
│       └── services
│           ├── __init__.py
│           └── test_some_service_name.py
└── __init__.py

Naming conventions

We follow 2 general naming conventions:

• The test file names should be test_the_name_of_the_thing_that_is_tested.py
• The test case shoud be class TheNameOfTheThingThatIsTestedTests(TestCase):

For example if we have:

def a_very_neat_service(*args, **kwargs):
    pass

We are going to have the following for file name:

project_name/app_name/tests/services/test_a_very_neat_service.py

And the following for test case:

class AVeryNeatServiceTests(TestCase):
    pass

For tests of utility functions, we follow a similiar pattern.

For example, if we have project_name/common/utils.py, then we are going to have project_name/common/tests/test_utils.py and place different test cases in that file.

If we are to split the utils.py module into submodules, the same will happen for the tests:

• project_name/common/utils/files.py
• project_name/common/tests/utils/test_files.py

We try to match the stucture of our modules with the structure of their respective tests.

Example

We have a demo django_styleguide project.

Example models

import uuid

from django.db import models
from django.contrib.auth.models import User
from django.utils import timezone

from djmoney.models.fields import MoneyField


class Item(models.Model):
    id = models.UUIDField(primary_key=True, default=uuid.uuid4, editable=False)

    name = models.CharField(max_length=255)
    description = models.TextField()

    price = MoneyField(
        max_digits=14,
        decimal_places=2,
        default_currency='EUR'
    )

    def __str__(self):
        return f'Item {self.id} / {self.name} / {self.price}'


class Payment(models.Model):
    item = models.ForeignKey(
        Item,
        on_delete=models.CASCADE,
        related_name='payments'
    )

    user = models.ForeignKey(
        User,
        on_delete=models.CASCADE,
        related_name='payments'
    )

    successful = models.BooleanField(default=False)

    created_at = models.DateTimeField(default=timezone.now)

    def __str__(self):
        return f'Payment for {self.item} / {self.user}'

Example selectors

For implementation of QuerySetType, check queryset_type.py.

from django.contrib.auth.models import User

from django_styleguide.common.types import QuerySetType

from django_styleguide.payments.models import Item


def get_items_for_user(
    *,
    user: User
) -> QuerySetType[Item]:
    return Item.objects.filter(payments__user=user)

Example services

from django.contrib.auth.models import User
from django.core.exceptions import ValidationError

from django_styleguide.payments.selectors import get_items_for_user
from django_styleguide.payments.models import Item, Payment
from django_styleguide.payments.tasks import charge_payment


def buy_item(
    *,
    item: Item,
    user: User,
) -> Payment:
    if item in get_items_for_user(user=user):
        raise ValidationError(f'Item {item} already in {user} items.')

    payment = Payment.objects.create(
        item=item,
        user=user,
        successful=False
    )

    charge_payment.delay(payment_id=payment.id)

    return payment

Testing services

Service tests are the most important tests in the project. Usually, those are the heavier tests with most lines of code.

General rule of thumb for service tests:

• The tests should cover the business logic behind the services in an exhaustive manner.
• The tests should hit the database - creating & reading from it.
• The tests should mock async task calls & everything that goes outside the project.

When creating the required state for a given test, one can use a combination of:

• Fakes (We recommend using faker)
• Other services, to create the required objects.
• Special test utility & helper methods.
• Factories (We recommend using factory_boy)
• Plain Model.objects.create() calls, if factories are not yet introduced in the project.

Lets take a look at our service from the example:

from django.contrib.auth.models import User
from django.core.exceptions import ValidationError

from django_styleguide.payments.selectors import get_items_for_user
from django_styleguide.payments.models import Item, Payment
from django_styleguide.payments.tasks import charge_payment


def buy_item(
    *,
    item: Item,
    user: User,
) -> Payment:
    if item in get_items_for_user(user=user):
        raise ValidationError(f'Item {item} already in {user} items.')

    payment = Payment.objects.create(
        item=item,
        user=user,
        successful=False
    )

    charge_payment.delay(payment_id=payment.id)

    return payment

The service:

• Calls a selector for validation
• Creates ORM object
• Calls a task

Those are our tests:

from unittest.mock import patch

from django.test import TestCase
from django.contrib.auth.models import User
from django.core.exceptions import ValidationError

from django_styleguide.payments.services import buy_item
from django_styleguide.payments.models import Payment, Item


class BuyItemTests(TestCase):
    def setUp(self):
        self.user = User.objects.create_user(username='Test User')
        self.item = Item.objects.create(
            name='Test Item',
            description='Test Item description',
            price=10.15
        )

        self.service = buy_item

    @patch('django_styleguide.payments.services.get_items_for_user')
    def test_buying_item_that_is_already_bought_fails(self, get_items_for_user_mock):
        """
        Since we already have tests for `get_items_for_user`,
        we can safely mock it here and give it a proper return value.
        """
        get_items_for_user_mock.return_value = [self.item]

        with self.assertRaises(ValidationError):
            self.service(user=self.user, item=self.item)

    @patch('django_styleguide.payments.services.charge_payment.delay')
    def test_buying_item_creates_a_payment_and_calls_charge_task(
        self,
        charge_payment_mock
    ):
        self.assertEqual(0, Payment.objects.count())

        payment = self.service(user=self.user, item=self.item)

        self.assertEqual(1, Payment.objects.count())
        self.assertEqual(payment, Payment.objects.first())

        self.assertFalse(payment.successful)

        charge_payment_mock.assert_called()

Testing selectors

Testing selectors is also an important part of every project.

Sometimes, the selectors can be really straightforward, and if we have to "cut corners", we can omit those tests. But it the end, it's important to cover our selectors too.

Lets take another look at our example selector:

from django.contrib.auth.models import User

from django_styleguide.common.types import QuerySetType

from django_styleguide.payments.models import Item


def get_items_for_user(
    *,
    user: User
) -> QuerySetType[Item]:
    return Item.objects.filter(payments__user=user)

As you can see, this is a very straightforward & simple selector. We can easily cover that with 2 to 3 tests.

Here are the tests:

from django.test import TestCase
from django.contrib.auth.models import User

from django_styleguide.payments.selectors import get_items_for_user
from django_styleguide.payments.models import Item, Payment


class GetItemsForUserTests(TestCase):
    def test_selector_returns_nothing_for_user_without_items(self):
        """
        This is a "corner case" test.
        We should get nothing if the user has no items.
        """
        user = User.objects.create_user(username='Test User')

        expected = []
        result = list(get_items_for_user(user=user))

        self.assertEqual(expected, result)

    def test_selector_returns_item_for_user_with_that_item(self):
        """
        This test will fail in case we change the model structure.
        """
        user = User.objects.create_user(username='Test User')

        item = Item.objects.create(
            name='Test Item',
            description='Test Item description',
            price=10.15
        )

        Payment.objects.create(
            item=item,
            user=user
        )

        expected = [item]
        result = list(get_items_for_user(user=user))

        self.assertEqual(expected, result)

Celery

We use Celery for the following general cases:

• Communicating with 3rd party services (sending emails, notifications, etc.)
• Offloading heavier computational tasks outside the HTTP cycle.
• Periodic tasks (using Celery beat)

We try to treat Celery as if it's just another interface to our core logic - meaning - don't put business logic there.

An exmaple task might look like this:

from celery import shared_task

from project.app.services import some_service_name as service


@shared_task
def some_service_name(*args, **kwargs):
    service(*args, **kwargs)

This is a task, having the same name as a service, which holds the actual business logic.

Of course, we can have more complex situations, like a chain or chord of tasks, each of them doing different domain related logic. In that case, it's hard to isolate everything in a service, because we now have dependencies between the tasks.

If that happens, we try to expose an interface to our domain & let the tasks work with that interface.

One can argue that having an ORM object is an interface by itself, and that's true. Sometimes, you can just update your object from a task & that's OK.

But there are times where you need to be strict and don't let tasks do database calls straight from the ORM, but rather, via an exposed interface for that.

More complex scenarios depend on their context. Make sure you are aware of the architecture & the decisions you are making.

Structure

Configuration

We put Celery configuration in a Django app called tasks. The Celery config itself is located in apps.py, in TasksConfig.ready method.

This Django app also holds any additional utilities, related to Celery.

Here's an example project/tasks/apps.py file:

import os

from celery import Celery

from django.apps import apps, AppConfig
from django.conf import settings


os.environ.setdefault('DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE', 'config.settings.local')


app = Celery('project')


class TasksConfig(AppConfig):
    name = 'project.tasks'
    verbose_name = 'Celery Config'

    def ready(self):
        app.config_from_object('django.conf:settings', namespace="CELERY")
        app.autodiscover_tasks()


@app.task(bind=True)
def debug_task(self):
    from celery.utils.log import base_logger
    base_logger = base_logger

    base_logger.debug('debug message')
    base_logger.info('info message')
    base_logger.warning('warning message')
    base_logger.error('error message')
    base_logger.critical('critical message')

    print('Request: {0!r}'.format(self.request))

    return 42

Tasks

Tasks are located in in tasks.py modules in different apps.

We follow the same rules as with everything else (APIs, services, selectors): if the tasks for a given app grow too big, split them by domain.

Meaning, you can end up with tasks/domain_a.py and tasks/domain_b.py. All you need to do is import them in tasks/__init__.py for Celery to autodiscover them.

The general rule of thumb is - split your tasks in a way that'll make sense to you.

Periodic Tasks

Managing periodic tasks is quite important, especially when you have tens, or hundreds of them.

We use Celery Beat + django_celery_beat.schedulers:DatabaseScheduler + django-celery-beat for our periodic tasks.

The extra thing that we do is to have a management command, called setup_periodic_tasks, which holds the definition of all periodic tasks within the system. This command is located in the tasks app, discussed above.

Here's how project.tasks.management.commands.setup_periodic_tasks.py looks like:

from django.core.management.base import BaseCommand
from django.db import transaction

from django_celery_beat.models import IntervalSchedule, CrontabSchedule, PeriodicTask

from project.app.tasks import some_periodic_task


class Command(BaseCommand):
    help = f"""
    Setup celery beat periodic tasks.

    Following tasks will be created:

    - {some_periodic_task.name}
    """

    @transaction.atomic
    def handle(self, *args, **kwargs):
        print('Deleting all periodic tasks and schedules...\n')

        IntervalSchedule.objects.all().delete()
        CrontabSchedule.objects.all().delete()
        PeriodicTask.objects.all().delete()

        periodic_tasks_data = [
            {
                'task': some_periodic_task
                'name': 'Do some peridoic stuff',
                # https://crontab.guru/#15_*_*_*_*
                'cron': {
                    'minute': '15',
                    'hour': '*',
                    'day_of_week': '*',
                    'day_of_month': '*',
                    'month_of_year': '*',
                },
                'enabled': True
            },
        ]

        for periodic_task in periodic_tasks_data:
            print(f'Setting up {periodic_task["task"].name}')

            cron = CrontabSchedule.objects.create(
                **periodic_task['cron']
            )

            PeriodicTask.objects.create(
                name=periodic_task['name'],
                task=periodic_task['task'].name,
                crontab=cron,
                enabled=periodic_task['enabled']
            )

Few key things:

• We use this task as part of a deploy procedure.
• We always put a link to crontab.guru to explain the cron. Otherwhise it's unreadable.
• Everything is in one place.

Configuration

Celery is a complex topic, so it's a good idea to invest time reading the documentation & understanding the different configuration options.

We constantly do that & find new things or find better approaches to our problems.

Inspiration

The way we do Django is inspired by the following things:

• The general idea for separation of concerns
• Boundaries by Gary Bernhardt
• Rails service objects