django/django
1
1
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/django/django.git synced 2025-11-04 09:57:47 +03:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Fixed #12237 -- Improved the error message for m2m fields with an explicit through model being listed in admin fieldsets. Thanks to Pyth for the report and Ramiro Morales for the patch.

Browse Source 
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@11744 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
This commit is contained in:
Russell Keith-Magee 2009-11-18 07:44:06 +00:00
parent cd0d7e676d
commit bb4062d53b
2 changed files with 31 additions and 5 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

20
django/contrib/admin/validation.py
View File

@ -198,7 +198,9 @@ def validate_base(cls, model):
check_formfield(cls, model, opts, 'fields', field)
f = get_field(cls, model, opts, 'fields', field)
if isinstance(f, models.ManyToManyField) and not f.rel.through._meta.auto_created:
raise ImproperlyConfigured("'%s.fields' can't include the ManyToManyField field '%s' because '%s' manually specifies a 'through' model." % (cls.__name__, field, field))
raise ImproperlyConfigured("'%s.fields' can't include the ManyToManyField "
"field '%s' because '%s' manually specifies "
"a 'through' model." % (cls.__name__, field, field))
if cls.fieldsets:
raise ImproperlyConfigured('Both fieldsets and fields are specified in %s.' % cls.__name__)
if len(cls.fields) > len(set(cls.fields)):
@ -217,11 +219,23 @@ def validate_base(cls, model):
raise ImproperlyConfigured("'fields' key is required in "
"%s.fieldsets[%d][1] field options dict."
% (cls.__name__, idx))
for field in fieldset[1]['fields']:
check_formfield(cls, model, opts, "fieldsets[%d][1]['fields']" % idx, field)
try:
f = opts.get_field(field)
if isinstance(f, models.ManyToManyField) and not f.rel.through._meta.auto_created:
raise ImproperlyConfigured("'%s.fieldsets[%d][1]['fields']' "
"can't include the ManyToManyField field '%s' because "
"'%s' manually specifies a 'through' model." % (
cls.__name__, idx, field, field))
except models.FieldDoesNotExist:
# If we can't find a field on the model that matches,
# it could be an extra field on the form.
pass
flattened_fieldsets = flatten_fieldsets(cls.fieldsets)
if len(flattened_fieldsets) > len(set(flattened_fieldsets)):
raise ImproperlyConfigured('There are duplicate field(s) in %s.fieldsets' % cls.__name__)
for field in flattened_fieldsets:
check_formfield(cls, model, opts, "fieldsets[%d][1]['fields']" % idx, field)
# form
if hasattr(cls, 'form') and not issubclass(cls.form, BaseModelForm):

16
tests/regressiontests/admin_validation/models.py
View File

@ -108,8 +108,9 @@ Exception: <class 'regressiontests.admin_validation.models.TwoAlbumFKAndAnE'> ha
>>> validate_inline(TwoAlbumFKAndAnEInline, None, Album)
# Regression test for #12203 - Fail more gracefully when a M2M field that
# specifies the 'through' option is included in the 'fields' ModelAdmin option.
# Regression test for #12203/#12237 - Fail more gracefully when a M2M field that
# specifies the 'through' option is included in the 'fields' or the 'fieldsets'
# ModelAdmin options.
>>> class BookAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):
... fields = ['authors']
@ -119,6 +120,17 @@ Traceback (most recent call last):
...
ImproperlyConfigured: 'BookAdmin.fields' can't include the ManyToManyField field 'authors' because 'authors' manually specifies a 'through' model.
>>> class FieldsetBookAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):
... fieldsets = (
... ('Header 1', {'fields': ('name',)}),
... ('Header 2', {'fields': ('authors',)}),
... )
>>> validate(FieldsetBookAdmin, Book)
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
ImproperlyConfigured: 'FieldsetBookAdmin.fieldsets[1][1]['fields']' can't include the ManyToManyField field 'authors' because 'authors' manually specifies a 'through' model.
# Regression test for #12209 -- If the explicitly provided through model
# is specified as a string, the admin should still be able use
# Model.m2m_field.through