Merge pull request #3853 from jpadilla/issue/3850

Fix broken link format
This commit is contained in:
José Padilla 2016-01-20 15:23:25 -04:00
commit 06dd55ac1c

View File

@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ This manager class now more nicely encapsulates that user instances and profile
has_support_contract=validated_data['profile']['has_support_contract'] has_support_contract=validated_data['profile']['has_support_contract']
) )
For more details on this approach see the Django documentation on [model managers](model-managers), and [this blogpost on using model and manager classes](encapsulation-blogpost). For more details on this approach see the Django documentation on [model managers][model-managers], and [this blogpost on using model and manager classes][encapsulation-blogpost].
## Dealing with multiple objects ## Dealing with multiple objects
@ -774,7 +774,7 @@ To support multiple updates you'll need to do so explicitly. When writing your m
* How should insertions be handled? Are they invalid, or do they create new objects? * How should insertions be handled? Are they invalid, or do they create new objects?
* How should removals be handled? Do they imply object deletion, or removing a relationship? Should they be silently ignored, or are they invalid? * How should removals be handled? Do they imply object deletion, or removing a relationship? Should they be silently ignored, or are they invalid?
* How should ordering be handled? Does changing the position of two items imply any state change or is it ignored? * How should ordering be handled? Does changing the position of two items imply any state change or is it ignored?
You will need to add an explicit `id` field to the instance serializer. The default implicitly-generated `id` field is marked as `read_only`. This causes it to be removed on updates. Once you declare it explicitly, it will be available in the list serializer's `update` method. You will need to add an explicit `id` field to the instance serializer. The default implicitly-generated `id` field is marked as `read_only`. This causes it to be removed on updates. Once you declare it explicitly, it will be available in the list serializer's `update` method.
Here's an example of how you might choose to implement multiple updates: Here's an example of how you might choose to implement multiple updates:
@ -808,7 +808,7 @@ Here's an example of how you might choose to implement multiple updates:
... ...
id = serializers.IntegerField(required=False) id = serializers.IntegerField(required=False)
class Meta: class Meta:
list_serializer_class = BookListSerializer list_serializer_class = BookListSerializer