mirror of
https://github.com/encode/django-rest-framework.git
synced 2024-11-10 19:56:59 +03:00
Change semantic of OR of two permission classes (#7522)
* Change semantic of OR of two permission classes The original semantic of OR is defined as: the request pass either of the two has_permission() check, and pass either of the two has_object_permission() check, which could lead to situations that a request passes has_permission() but fails on has_object_permission() of Permission Class A, fails has_permission() but passes has_object_permission() of Permission Class B, passes the OR permission check. This should not be the desired permission check semantic in applications, because such a request should fail on either Permission Class (on Django object permission) alone, but passes the OR or the two. My code fix this by changing the semantic so that the request has to pass either class's has_permission() and has_object_permission() to get the Django object permission of the OR check. * Update rest_framework/permissions.py * Update setup.cfg Co-authored-by: Mark Yu <markyu98@outlook.com> Co-authored-by: Tom Christie <tom@tomchristie.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
354ae73ffb
commit
4aea8dd65a
|
@ -78,8 +78,11 @@ class OR:
|
|||
|
||||
def has_object_permission(self, request, view, obj):
|
||||
return (
|
||||
self.op1.has_object_permission(request, view, obj) or
|
||||
self.op2.has_object_permission(request, view, obj)
|
||||
self.op1.has_permission(request, view)
|
||||
and self.op1.has_object_permission(request, view, obj)
|
||||
) or (
|
||||
self.op2.has_permission(request, view)
|
||||
and self.op2.has_object_permission(request, view, obj)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ license_files = LICENSE.md
|
|||
addopts=--tb=short --strict-markers -ra
|
||||
|
||||
[flake8]
|
||||
ignore = E501,W504
|
||||
ignore = E501,W503,W504
|
||||
banned-modules = json = use from rest_framework.utils import json!
|
||||
|
||||
[isort]
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -635,7 +635,7 @@ class PermissionsCompositionTests(TestCase):
|
|||
composed_perm = (permissions.IsAuthenticated | permissions.AllowAny)
|
||||
hasperm = composed_perm().has_object_permission(request, None, None)
|
||||
assert hasperm is True
|
||||
assert mock_deny.call_count == 1
|
||||
assert mock_deny.call_count == 0
|
||||
assert mock_allow.call_count == 1
|
||||
|
||||
def test_and_lazyness(self):
|
||||
|
@ -677,3 +677,16 @@ class PermissionsCompositionTests(TestCase):
|
|||
assert hasperm is False
|
||||
assert mock_deny.call_count == 1
|
||||
mock_allow.assert_not_called()
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unimplemented_has_object_permission(self):
|
||||
"test for issue 6402 https://github.com/encode/django-rest-framework/issues/6402"
|
||||
request = factory.get('/1', format='json')
|
||||
request.user = AnonymousUser()
|
||||
|
||||
class IsAuthenticatedUserOwner(permissions.IsAuthenticated):
|
||||
def has_object_permission(self, request, view, obj):
|
||||
return True
|
||||
|
||||
composed_perm = (IsAuthenticatedUserOwner | permissions.IsAdminUser)
|
||||
hasperm = composed_perm().has_object_permission(request, None, None)
|
||||
assert hasperm is False
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user