404
+Page not found
+Try the homepage, or search the documentation.
+ + + +diff --git a/404.html b/404.html index c2d6c8238..1402fb9f4 100644 --- a/404.html +++ b/404.html @@ -1,167 +1,475 @@ - + -
- - -Natosha McDade, Yassin Mohamed, Finan H. Berhe, Sean Reed, Steven Demarco Taylor, Breonna Taylor, Ariane McCree, Terrance Franklin, Miles Hall, Darius Tarver, William Green, Samuel David Mallard, Kwame Jones, De’von Bailey, Christopher Whitfield, Anthony Hill, De’Von Bailey, Eric Logan, Jamarion Robinson, Gregory Hill Jr, JaQuavion Slaton, Ryan Twyman, Brandon Webber, Jimmy Atchison, Willie McCoy, Emantic Fitzgerald Bradford J, D’ettrick Griffin, Jemel Roberson, DeAndre Ballard, Botham Shem Jean, Robert Lawrence White, Anthony Lamar Smith, Ramarley Graham, Manuel Loggins Jr, Trayvon Martin, Wendell Allen, Kendrec McDade, Larry Jackson Jr, Jonathan Ferrell, Jordan Baker, Victor White III, Dontre Hamilton, Eric Garner, John Crawford III, Michael Brown, Ezell Ford, Dante Parker, Kajieme Powell, Laquan McDonald, Akai Gurley, Tamir Rice, Rumain Brisbon, Jerame Reid, Charly Keunang, Tony Robinson, Walter Scott, Freddie Gray, Brendon Glenn, Samuel DuBose, Christian Taylor, Jamar Clark, Mario Woods, Quintonio LeGrier, Gregory Gunn, Akiel Denkins, Alton Sterling, Philando Castile, Terrence Sterling, Terence Crutcher, Keith Lamont Scott, Alfred Olango, Jordan Edwards, Stephon Clark, Danny Ray Thomas, DeJuan Guillory, Patrick Harmon, Jonathan Hart, Maurice Granton, Julius Johnson, Jamee Johnson, Michael Dean...
- -++Auth needs to be pluggable.
+— Jacob Kaplan-Moss, "REST worst practices"
+
Authentication is the mechanism of associating an incoming request with a set of identifying credentials, such as the user the request came from, or the token that it was signed with. The permission and throttling policies can then use those credentials to determine if the request should be permitted.
+REST framework provides a number of authentication schemes out of the box, and also allows you to implement custom schemes.
+Authentication is always run at the very start of the view, before the permission and throttling checks occur, and before any other code is allowed to proceed.
+The request.user
property will typically be set to an instance of the contrib.auth
package's User
class.
The request.auth
property is used for any additional authentication information, for example, it may be used to represent an authentication token that the request was signed with.
Note: Don't forget that authentication by itself won't allow or disallow an incoming request, it simply identifies the credentials that the request was made with.
+For information on how to setup the permission polices for your API please see the permissions documentation.
+The authentication schemes are always defined as a list of classes. REST framework will attempt to authenticate with each class in the list, and will set request.user
and request.auth
using the return value of the first class that successfully authenticates.
If no class authenticates, request.user
will be set to an instance of django.contrib.auth.models.AnonymousUser
, and request.auth
will be set to None
.
The value of request.user
and request.auth
for unauthenticated requests can be modified using the UNAUTHENTICATED_USER
and UNAUTHENTICATED_TOKEN
settings.
The default authentication schemes may be set globally, using the DEFAULT_AUTHENTICATION_CLASSES
setting. For example.
REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ 'DEFAULT_AUTHENTICATION_CLASSES': [
+ 'rest_framework.authentication.BasicAuthentication',
+ 'rest_framework.authentication.SessionAuthentication',
+ ]
+}
+
+You can also set the authentication scheme on a per-view or per-viewset basis,
+using the APIView
class-based views.
from rest_framework.authentication import SessionAuthentication, BasicAuthentication
+from rest_framework.permissions import IsAuthenticated
+from rest_framework.response import Response
+from rest_framework.views import APIView
+
+class ExampleView(APIView):
+ authentication_classes = [SessionAuthentication, BasicAuthentication]
+ permission_classes = [IsAuthenticated]
+
+ def get(self, request, format=None):
+ content = {
+ 'user': unicode(request.user), # `django.contrib.auth.User` instance.
+ 'auth': unicode(request.auth), # None
+ }
+ return Response(content)
+
+Or, if you're using the @api_view
decorator with function based views.
@api_view(['GET'])
+@authentication_classes([SessionAuthentication, BasicAuthentication])
+@permission_classes([IsAuthenticated])
+def example_view(request, format=None):
+ content = {
+ 'user': unicode(request.user), # `django.contrib.auth.User` instance.
+ 'auth': unicode(request.auth), # None
+ }
+ return Response(content)
+
+When an unauthenticated request is denied permission there are two different error codes that may be appropriate.
+ +HTTP 401 responses must always include a WWW-Authenticate
header, that instructs the client how to authenticate. HTTP 403 responses do not include the WWW-Authenticate
header.
The kind of response that will be used depends on the authentication scheme. Although multiple authentication schemes may be in use, only one scheme may be used to determine the type of response. The first authentication class set on the view is used when determining the type of response.
+Note that when a request may successfully authenticate, but still be denied permission to perform the request, in which case a 403 Permission Denied
response will always be used, regardless of the authentication scheme.
Note that if deploying to Apache using mod_wsgi, the authorization header is not passed through to a WSGI application by default, as it is assumed that authentication will be handled by Apache, rather than at an application level.
+If you are deploying to Apache, and using any non-session based authentication, you will need to explicitly configure mod_wsgi to pass the required headers through to the application. This can be done by specifying the WSGIPassAuthorization
directive in the appropriate context and setting it to 'On'
.
# this can go in either server config, virtual host, directory or .htaccess
+WSGIPassAuthorization On
+
+This authentication scheme uses HTTP Basic Authentication, signed against a user's username and password. Basic authentication is generally only appropriate for testing.
+If successfully authenticated, BasicAuthentication
provides the following credentials.
request.user
will be a Django User
instance.request.auth
will be None
.Unauthenticated responses that are denied permission will result in an HTTP 401 Unauthorized
response with an appropriate WWW-Authenticate header. For example:
WWW-Authenticate: Basic realm="api"
+
+Note: If you use BasicAuthentication
in production you must ensure that your API is only available over https
. You should also ensure that your API clients will always re-request the username and password at login, and will never store those details to persistent storage.
This authentication scheme uses a simple token-based HTTP Authentication scheme. Token authentication is appropriate for client-server setups, such as native desktop and mobile clients.
+To use the TokenAuthentication
scheme you'll need to configure the authentication classes to include TokenAuthentication
, and additionally include rest_framework.authtoken
in your INSTALLED_APPS
setting:
INSTALLED_APPS = [
+ ...
+ 'rest_framework.authtoken'
+]
+
+Note: Make sure to run manage.py migrate
after changing your settings. The rest_framework.authtoken
app provides Django database migrations.
You'll also need to create tokens for your users.
+from rest_framework.authtoken.models import Token
+
+token = Token.objects.create(user=...)
+print(token.key)
+
+For clients to authenticate, the token key should be included in the Authorization
HTTP header. The key should be prefixed by the string literal "Token", with whitespace separating the two strings. For example:
Authorization: Token 9944b09199c62bcf9418ad846dd0e4bbdfc6ee4b
+
+Note: If you want to use a different keyword in the header, such as Bearer
, simply subclass TokenAuthentication
and set the keyword
class variable.
If successfully authenticated, TokenAuthentication
provides the following credentials.
request.user
will be a Django User
instance.request.auth
will be a rest_framework.authtoken.models.Token
instance.Unauthenticated responses that are denied permission will result in an HTTP 401 Unauthorized
response with an appropriate WWW-Authenticate header. For example:
WWW-Authenticate: Token
+
+The curl
command line tool may be useful for testing token authenticated APIs. For example:
curl -X GET http://127.0.0.1:8000/api/example/ -H 'Authorization: Token 9944b09199c62bcf9418ad846dd0e4bbdfc6ee4b'
+
+Note: If you use TokenAuthentication
in production you must ensure that your API is only available over https
.
If you want every user to have an automatically generated Token, you can simply catch the User's post_save
signal.
from django.conf import settings
+from django.db.models.signals import post_save
+from django.dispatch import receiver
+from rest_framework.authtoken.models import Token
+
+@receiver(post_save, sender=settings.AUTH_USER_MODEL)
+def create_auth_token(sender, instance=None, created=False, **kwargs):
+ if created:
+ Token.objects.create(user=instance)
+
+Note that you'll want to ensure you place this code snippet in an installed models.py
module, or some other location that will be imported by Django on startup.
If you've already created some users, you can generate tokens for all existing users like this:
+from django.contrib.auth.models import User
+from rest_framework.authtoken.models import Token
+
+for user in User.objects.all():
+ Token.objects.get_or_create(user=user)
+
+When using TokenAuthentication
, you may want to provide a mechanism for clients to obtain a token given the username and password. REST framework provides a built-in view to provide this behavior. To use it, add the obtain_auth_token
view to your URLconf:
from rest_framework.authtoken import views
+urlpatterns += [
+ url(r'^api-token-auth/', views.obtain_auth_token)
+]
+
+Note that the URL part of the pattern can be whatever you want to use.
+The obtain_auth_token
view will return a JSON response when valid username
and password
fields are POSTed to the view using form data or JSON:
{ 'token' : '9944b09199c62bcf9418ad846dd0e4bbdfc6ee4b' }
+
+Note that the default obtain_auth_token
view explicitly uses JSON requests and responses, rather than using default renderer and parser classes in your settings.
By default there are no permissions or throttling applied to the obtain_auth_token
view. If you do wish to apply throttling you'll need to override the view class,
+and include them using the throttle_classes
attribute.
If you need a customized version of the obtain_auth_token
view, you can do so by subclassing the ObtainAuthToken
view class, and using that in your url conf instead.
For example, you may return additional user information beyond the token
value:
from rest_framework.authtoken.views import ObtainAuthToken
+from rest_framework.authtoken.models import Token
+from rest_framework.response import Response
+
+class CustomAuthToken(ObtainAuthToken):
+
+ def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
+ serializer = self.serializer_class(data=request.data,
+ context={'request': request})
+ serializer.is_valid(raise_exception=True)
+ user = serializer.validated_data['user']
+ token, created = Token.objects.get_or_create(user=user)
+ return Response({
+ 'token': token.key,
+ 'user_id': user.pk,
+ 'email': user.email
+ })
+
+And in your urls.py
:
urlpatterns += [
+ url(r'^api-token-auth/', CustomAuthToken.as_view())
+]
+
+It is also possible to create Tokens manually through admin interface. In case you are using a large user base, we recommend that you monkey patch the TokenAdmin
class to customize it to your needs, more specifically by declaring the user
field as raw_field
.
your_app/admin.py
:
from rest_framework.authtoken.admin import TokenAdmin
+
+TokenAdmin.raw_id_fields = ['user']
+
+Since version 3.6.4 it's possible to generate a user token using the following command:
+./manage.py drf_create_token <username>
+
+this command will return the API token for the given user, creating it if it doesn't exist:
+Generated token 9944b09199c62bcf9418ad846dd0e4bbdfc6ee4b for user user1
+
+In case you want to regenerate the token (for example if it has been compromised or leaked) you can pass an additional parameter:
+./manage.py drf_create_token -r <username>
+
+This authentication scheme uses Django's default session backend for authentication. Session authentication is appropriate for AJAX clients that are running in the same session context as your website.
+If successfully authenticated, SessionAuthentication
provides the following credentials.
request.user
will be a Django User
instance.request.auth
will be None
.Unauthenticated responses that are denied permission will result in an HTTP 403 Forbidden
response.
If you're using an AJAX style API with SessionAuthentication, you'll need to make sure you include a valid CSRF token for any "unsafe" HTTP method calls, such as PUT
, PATCH
, POST
or DELETE
requests. See the Django CSRF documentation for more details.
Warning: Always use Django's standard login view when creating login pages. This will ensure your login views are properly protected.
+CSRF validation in REST framework works slightly differently to standard Django due to the need to support both session and non-session based authentication to the same views. This means that only authenticated requests require CSRF tokens, and anonymous requests may be sent without CSRF tokens. This behaviour is not suitable for login views, which should always have CSRF validation applied.
+This authentication scheme allows you to delegate authentication to your web server, which sets the REMOTE_USER
+environment variable.
To use it, you must have django.contrib.auth.backends.RemoteUserBackend
(or a subclass) in your
+AUTHENTICATION_BACKENDS
setting. By default, RemoteUserBackend
creates User
objects for usernames that don't
+already exist. To change this and other behaviour, consult the
+Django documentation.
If successfully authenticated, RemoteUserAuthentication
provides the following credentials:
request.user
will be a Django User
instance.request.auth
will be None
.Consult your web server's documentation for information about configuring an authentication method, e.g.:
+ +To implement a custom authentication scheme, subclass BaseAuthentication
and override the .authenticate(self, request)
method. The method should return a two-tuple of (user, auth)
if authentication succeeds, or None
otherwise.
In some circumstances instead of returning None
, you may want to raise an AuthenticationFailed
exception from the .authenticate()
method.
Typically the approach you should take is:
+None
. Any other authentication schemes also in use will still be checked.AuthenticationFailed
exception. An error response will be returned immediately, regardless of any permissions checks, and without checking any other authentication schemes.You may also override the .authenticate_header(self, request)
method. If implemented, it should return a string that will be used as the value of the WWW-Authenticate
header in a HTTP 401 Unauthorized
response.
If the .authenticate_header()
method is not overridden, the authentication scheme will return HTTP 403 Forbidden
responses when an unauthenticated request is denied access.
Note: When your custom authenticator is invoked by the request object's .user
or .auth
properties, you may see an AttributeError
re-raised as a WrappedAttributeError
. This is necessary to prevent the original exception from being suppressed by the outer property access. Python will not recognize that the AttributeError
originates from your custom authenticator and will instead assume that the request object does not have a .user
or .auth
property. These errors should be fixed or otherwise handled by your authenticator.
The following example will authenticate any incoming request as the user given by the username in a custom request header named 'X-USERNAME'.
+from django.contrib.auth.models import User
+from rest_framework import authentication
+from rest_framework import exceptions
+
+class ExampleAuthentication(authentication.BaseAuthentication):
+ def authenticate(self, request):
+ username = request.META.get('HTTP_X_USERNAME')
+ if not username:
+ return None
+
+ try:
+ user = User.objects.get(username=username)
+ except User.DoesNotExist:
+ raise exceptions.AuthenticationFailed('No such user')
+
+ return (user, None)
+
+The following third party packages are also available.
+The Django OAuth Toolkit package provides OAuth 2.0 support and works with Python 3.4+. The package is maintained by Evonove and uses the excellent OAuthLib. The package is well documented, and well supported and is currently our recommended package for OAuth 2.0 support.
+Install using pip
.
pip install django-oauth-toolkit
+
+Add the package to your INSTALLED_APPS
and modify your REST framework settings.
INSTALLED_APPS = [
+ ...
+ 'oauth2_provider',
+]
+
+REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ 'DEFAULT_AUTHENTICATION_CLASSES': [
+ 'oauth2_provider.contrib.rest_framework.OAuth2Authentication',
+ ]
+}
+
+For more details see the Django REST framework - Getting started documentation.
+The Django REST framework OAuth package provides both OAuth1 and OAuth2 support for REST framework.
+This package was previously included directly in REST framework but is now supported and maintained as a third party package.
+Install the package using pip
.
pip install djangorestframework-oauth
+
+For details on configuration and usage see the Django REST framework OAuth documentation for authentication and permissions.
+JSON Web Token is a fairly new standard which can be used for token-based authentication. Unlike the built-in TokenAuthentication scheme, JWT Authentication doesn't need to use a database to validate a token. A package for JWT authentication is djangorestframework-simplejwt which provides some features as well as a pluggable token blacklist app.
+The HawkREST library builds on the Mohawk library to let you work with Hawk signed requests and responses in your API. Hawk lets two parties securely communicate with each other using messages signed by a shared key. It is based on HTTP MAC access authentication (which was based on parts of OAuth 1.0).
+HTTP Signature (currently a IETF draft) provides a way to achieve origin authentication and message integrity for HTTP messages. Similar to Amazon's HTTP Signature scheme, used by many of its services, it permits stateless, per-request authentication. Elvio Toccalino maintains the djangorestframework-httpsignature (outdated) package which provides an easy to use HTTP Signature Authentication mechanism. You can use the updated fork version of djangorestframework-httpsignature, which is drf-httpsig.
+Djoser library provides a set of views to handle basic actions such as registration, login, logout, password reset and account activation. The package works with a custom user model and it uses token based authentication. This is a ready to use REST implementation of Django authentication system.
+Django-rest-auth library provides a set of REST API endpoints for registration, authentication (including social media authentication), password reset, retrieve and update user details, etc. By having these API endpoints, your client apps such as AngularJS, iOS, Android, and others can communicate to your Django backend site independently via REST APIs for user management.
+Django-rest-framework-social-oauth2 library provides an easy way to integrate social plugins (facebook, twitter, google, etc.) to your authentication system and an easy oauth2 setup. With this library, you will be able to authenticate users based on external tokens (e.g. facebook access token), convert these tokens to "in-house" oauth2 tokens and use and generate oauth2 tokens to authenticate your users.
+Django-rest-knox library provides models and views to handle token based authentication in a more secure and extensible way than the built-in TokenAuthentication scheme - with Single Page Applications and Mobile clients in mind. It provides per-client tokens, and views to generate them when provided some other authentication (usually basic authentication), to delete the token (providing a server enforced logout) and to delete all tokens (logs out all clients that a user is logged into).
+drfpasswordless adds (Medium, Square Cash inspired) passwordless support to Django REST Framework's own TokenAuthentication scheme. Users log in and sign up with a token sent to a contact point like an email address or a mobile number.
+ + +++A certain woman had a very sharp consciousness but almost no +memory ... She remembered enough to work, and she worked hard. +- Lydia Davis
+
Caching in REST Framework works well with the cache utilities +provided in Django.
+Django provides a method_decorator
to use
+decorators with class based views. This can be used with
+other cache decorators such as cache_page
and
+vary_on_cookie
.
from django.utils.decorators import method_decorator
+from django.views.decorators.cache import cache_page
+from django.views.decorators.vary import vary_on_cookie
+
+from rest_framework.response import Response
+from rest_framework.views import APIView
+from rest_framework import viewsets
+
+
+class UserViewSet(viewsets.ViewSet):
+
+ # Cache requested url for each user for 2 hours
+ @method_decorator(cache_page(60*60*2))
+ @method_decorator(vary_on_cookie)
+ def list(self, request, format=None):
+ content = {
+ 'user_feed': request.user.get_user_feed()
+ }
+ return Response(content)
+
+
+class PostView(APIView):
+
+ # Cache page for the requested url
+ @method_decorator(cache_page(60*60*2))
+ def get(self, request, format=None):
+ content = {
+ 'title': 'Post title',
+ 'body': 'Post content'
+ }
+ return Response(content)
+
+
+NOTE: The cache_page
decorator only caches the
+GET
and HEAD
responses with status 200.
++HTTP has provisions for several mechanisms for "content negotiation" - the process of selecting the best representation for a given response when there are multiple representations available.
+— RFC 2616, Fielding et al.
+
Content negotiation is the process of selecting one of multiple possible representations to return to a client, based on client or server preferences.
+REST framework uses a simple style of content negotiation to determine which media type should be returned to a client, based on the available renderers, the priorities of each of those renderers, and the client's Accept:
header. The style used is partly client-driven, and partly server-driven.
For example, given the following Accept
header:
application/json; indent=4, application/json, application/yaml, text/html, */*
+
+The priorities for each of the given media types would be:
+application/json; indent=4
application/json
, application/yaml
and text/html
*/*
If the requested view was only configured with renderers for YAML
and HTML
, then REST framework would select whichever renderer was listed first in the renderer_classes
list or DEFAULT_RENDERER_CLASSES
setting.
For more information on the HTTP Accept
header, see RFC 2616
Note: "q" values are not taken into account by REST framework when determining preference. The use of "q" values negatively impacts caching, and in the author's opinion they are an unnecessary and overcomplicated approach to content negotiation.
+This is a valid approach as the HTTP spec deliberately underspecifies how a server should weight server-based preferences against client-based preferences.
+It's unlikely that you'll want to provide a custom content negotiation scheme for REST framework, but you can do so if needed. To implement a custom content negotiation scheme override BaseContentNegotiation
.
REST framework's content negotiation classes handle selection of both the appropriate parser for the request, and the appropriate renderer for the response, so you should implement both the .select_parser(request, parsers)
and .select_renderer(request, renderers, format_suffix)
methods.
The select_parser()
method should return one of the parser instances from the list of available parsers, or None
if none of the parsers can handle the incoming request.
The select_renderer()
method should return a two-tuple of (renderer instance, media type), or raise a NotAcceptable
exception.
The following is a custom content negotiation class which ignores the client +request when selecting the appropriate parser or renderer.
+from rest_framework.negotiation import BaseContentNegotiation
+
+class IgnoreClientContentNegotiation(BaseContentNegotiation):
+ def select_parser(self, request, parsers):
+ """
+ Select the first parser in the `.parser_classes` list.
+ """
+ return parsers[0]
+
+ def select_renderer(self, request, renderers, format_suffix):
+ """
+ Select the first renderer in the `.renderer_classes` list.
+ """
+ return (renderers[0], renderers[0].media_type)
+
+The default content negotiation class may be set globally, using the DEFAULT_CONTENT_NEGOTIATION_CLASS
setting. For example, the following settings would use our example IgnoreClientContentNegotiation
class.
REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ 'DEFAULT_CONTENT_NEGOTIATION_CLASS': 'myapp.negotiation.IgnoreClientContentNegotiation',
+}
+
+You can also set the content negotiation used for an individual view, or viewset, using the APIView
class-based views.
from myapp.negotiation import IgnoreClientContentNegotiation
+from rest_framework.response import Response
+from rest_framework.views import APIView
+
+class NoNegotiationView(APIView):
+ """
+ An example view that does not perform content negotiation.
+ """
+ content_negotiation_class = IgnoreClientContentNegotiation
+
+ def get(self, request, format=None):
+ return Response({
+ 'accepted media type': request.accepted_renderer.media_type
+ })
+
+
+
+ ++Exceptions… allow error handling to be organized cleanly in a central or high-level place within the program structure.
+— Doug Hellmann, Python Exception Handling Techniques
+
REST framework's views handle various exceptions, and deal with returning appropriate error responses.
+The handled exceptions are:
+APIException
raised inside REST framework.Http404
exception.PermissionDenied
exception.In each case, REST framework will return a response with an appropriate status code and content-type. The body of the response will include any additional details regarding the nature of the error.
+Most error responses will include a key detail
in the body of the response.
For example, the following request:
+DELETE http://api.example.com/foo/bar HTTP/1.1
+Accept: application/json
+
+Might receive an error response indicating that the DELETE
method is not allowed on that resource:
HTTP/1.1 405 Method Not Allowed
+Content-Type: application/json
+Content-Length: 42
+
+{"detail": "Method 'DELETE' not allowed."}
+
+Validation errors are handled slightly differently, and will include the field names as the keys in the response. If the validation error was not specific to a particular field then it will use the "non_field_errors" key, or whatever string value has been set for the NON_FIELD_ERRORS_KEY
setting.
Any example validation error might look like this:
+HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request
+Content-Type: application/json
+Content-Length: 94
+
+{"amount": ["A valid integer is required."], "description": ["This field may not be blank."]}
+
+You can implement custom exception handling by creating a handler function that converts exceptions raised in your API views into response objects. This allows you to control the style of error responses used by your API.
+The function must take a pair of arguments, the first is the exception to be handled, and the second is a dictionary containing any extra context such as the view currently being handled. The exception handler function should either return a Response
object, or return None
if the exception cannot be handled. If the handler returns None
then the exception will be re-raised and Django will return a standard HTTP 500 'server error' response.
For example, you might want to ensure that all error responses include the HTTP status code in the body of the response, like so:
+HTTP/1.1 405 Method Not Allowed
+Content-Type: application/json
+Content-Length: 62
+
+{"status_code": 405, "detail": "Method 'DELETE' not allowed."}
+
+In order to alter the style of the response, you could write the following custom exception handler:
+from rest_framework.views import exception_handler
+
+def custom_exception_handler(exc, context):
+ # Call REST framework's default exception handler first,
+ # to get the standard error response.
+ response = exception_handler(exc, context)
+
+ # Now add the HTTP status code to the response.
+ if response is not None:
+ response.data['status_code'] = response.status_code
+
+ return response
+
+The context argument is not used by the default handler, but can be useful if the exception handler needs further information such as the view currently being handled, which can be accessed as context['view']
.
The exception handler must also be configured in your settings, using the EXCEPTION_HANDLER
setting key. For example:
REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ 'EXCEPTION_HANDLER': 'my_project.my_app.utils.custom_exception_handler'
+}
+
+If not specified, the 'EXCEPTION_HANDLER'
setting defaults to the standard exception handler provided by REST framework:
REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ 'EXCEPTION_HANDLER': 'rest_framework.views.exception_handler'
+}
+
+Note that the exception handler will only be called for responses generated by raised exceptions. It will not be used for any responses returned directly by the view, such as the HTTP_400_BAD_REQUEST
responses that are returned by the generic views when serializer validation fails.
Signature: APIException()
The base class for all exceptions raised inside an APIView
class or @api_view
.
To provide a custom exception, subclass APIException
and set the .status_code
, .default_detail
, and default_code
attributes on the class.
For example, if your API relies on a third party service that may sometimes be unreachable, you might want to implement an exception for the "503 Service Unavailable" HTTP response code. You could do this like so:
+from rest_framework.exceptions import APIException
+
+class ServiceUnavailable(APIException):
+ status_code = 503
+ default_detail = 'Service temporarily unavailable, try again later.'
+ default_code = 'service_unavailable'
+
+There are a number of different properties available for inspecting the status +of an API exception. You can use these to build custom exception handling +for your project.
+The available attributes and methods are:
+.detail
- Return the textual description of the error..get_codes()
- Return the code identifier of the error..get_full_details()
- Return both the textual description and the code identifier.In most cases the error detail will be a simple item:
+>>> print(exc.detail)
+You do not have permission to perform this action.
+>>> print(exc.get_codes())
+permission_denied
+>>> print(exc.get_full_details())
+{'message':'You do not have permission to perform this action.','code':'permission_denied'}
+
+In the case of validation errors the error detail will be either a list or +dictionary of items:
+>>> print(exc.detail)
+{"name":"This field is required.","age":"A valid integer is required."}
+>>> print(exc.get_codes())
+{"name":"required","age":"invalid"}
+>>> print(exc.get_full_details())
+{"name":{"message":"This field is required.","code":"required"},"age":{"message":"A valid integer is required.","code":"invalid"}}
+
+Signature: ParseError(detail=None, code=None)
Raised if the request contains malformed data when accessing request.data
.
By default this exception results in a response with the HTTP status code "400 Bad Request".
+Signature: AuthenticationFailed(detail=None, code=None)
Raised when an incoming request includes incorrect authentication.
+By default this exception results in a response with the HTTP status code "401 Unauthenticated", but it may also result in a "403 Forbidden" response, depending on the authentication scheme in use. See the authentication documentation for more details.
+Signature: NotAuthenticated(detail=None, code=None)
Raised when an unauthenticated request fails the permission checks.
+By default this exception results in a response with the HTTP status code "401 Unauthenticated", but it may also result in a "403 Forbidden" response, depending on the authentication scheme in use. See the authentication documentation for more details.
+Signature: PermissionDenied(detail=None, code=None)
Raised when an authenticated request fails the permission checks.
+By default this exception results in a response with the HTTP status code "403 Forbidden".
+Signature: NotFound(detail=None, code=None)
Raised when a resource does not exists at the given URL. This exception is equivalent to the standard Http404
Django exception.
By default this exception results in a response with the HTTP status code "404 Not Found".
+Signature: MethodNotAllowed(method, detail=None, code=None)
Raised when an incoming request occurs that does not map to a handler method on the view.
+By default this exception results in a response with the HTTP status code "405 Method Not Allowed".
+Signature: NotAcceptable(detail=None, code=None)
Raised when an incoming request occurs with an Accept
header that cannot be satisfied by any of the available renderers.
By default this exception results in a response with the HTTP status code "406 Not Acceptable".
+Signature: UnsupportedMediaType(media_type, detail=None, code=None)
Raised if there are no parsers that can handle the content type of the request data when accessing request.data
.
By default this exception results in a response with the HTTP status code "415 Unsupported Media Type".
+Signature: Throttled(wait=None, detail=None, code=None)
Raised when an incoming request fails the throttling checks.
+By default this exception results in a response with the HTTP status code "429 Too Many Requests".
+Signature: ValidationError(detail, code=None)
The ValidationError
exception is slightly different from the other APIException
classes:
detail
argument is mandatory, not optional.detail
argument may be a list or dictionary of error details, and may also be a nested data structure.ValidationError
style, in order to differentiate it from Django's built-in validation error. For example. raise serializers.ValidationError('This field must be an integer value.')
The ValidationError
class should be used for serializer and field validation, and by validator classes. It is also raised when calling serializer.is_valid
with the raise_exception
keyword argument:
serializer.is_valid(raise_exception=True)
+
+The generic views use the raise_exception=True
flag, which means that you can override the style of validation error responses globally in your API. To do so, use a custom exception handler, as described above.
By default this exception results in a response with the HTTP status code "400 Bad Request".
+Django REST Framework provides two error views suitable for providing generic JSON 500
Server Error and
+400
Bad Request responses. (Django's default error views provide HTML responses, which may not be appropriate for an
+API-only application.)
Use these as per Django's Customizing error views documentation.
+rest_framework.exceptions.server_error
Returns a response with status code 500
and application/json
content type.
Set as handler500
:
handler500 = 'rest_framework.exceptions.server_error'
+
+rest_framework.exceptions.bad_request
Returns a response with status code 400
and application/json
content type.
Set as handler400
:
handler400 = 'rest_framework.exceptions.bad_request'
+
+
+
+ ++Each field in a Form class is responsible not only for validating data, but also for "cleaning" it — normalizing it to a consistent format.
+ +
Serializer fields handle converting between primitive values and internal datatypes. They also deal with validating input values, as well as retrieving and setting the values from their parent objects.
+Note: The serializer fields are declared in fields.py
, but by convention you should import them using from rest_framework import serializers
and refer to fields as serializers.<FieldName>
.
Each serializer field class constructor takes at least these arguments. Some Field classes take additional, field-specific arguments, but the following should always be accepted:
+read_only
Read-only fields are included in the API output, but should not be included in the input during create or update operations. Any 'read_only' fields that are incorrectly included in the serializer input will be ignored.
+Set this to True
to ensure that the field is used when serializing a representation, but is not used when creating or updating an instance during deserialization.
Defaults to False
write_only
Set this to True
to ensure that the field may be used when updating or creating an instance, but is not included when serializing the representation.
Defaults to False
required
Normally an error will be raised if a field is not supplied during deserialization. +Set to false if this field is not required to be present during deserialization.
+Setting this to False
also allows the object attribute or dictionary key to be omitted from output when serializing the instance. If the key is not present it will simply not be included in the output representation.
Defaults to True
.
default
If set, this gives the default value that will be used for the field if no input value is supplied. If not set the default behaviour is to not populate the attribute at all.
+The default
is not applied during partial update operations. In the partial update case only fields that are provided in the incoming data will have a validated value returned.
May be set to a function or other callable, in which case the value will be evaluated each time it is used. When called, it will receive no arguments. If the callable has a requires_context = True
attribute, then the serializer field will be passed as an argument.
For example:
+class CurrentUserDefault:
+ """
+ May be applied as a `default=...` value on a serializer field.
+ Returns the current user.
+ """
+ requires_context = True
+
+ def __call__(self, serializer_field):
+ return serializer_field.context['request'].user
+
+When serializing the instance, default will be used if the object attribute or dictionary key is not present in the instance.
+Note that setting a default
value implies that the field is not required. Including both the default
and required
keyword arguments is invalid and will raise an error.
allow_null
Normally an error will be raised if None
is passed to a serializer field. Set this keyword argument to True
if None
should be considered a valid value.
Note that, without an explicit default
, setting this argument to True
will imply a default
value of null
for serialization output, but does not imply a default for input deserialization.
Defaults to False
source
The name of the attribute that will be used to populate the field. May be a method that only takes a self
argument, such as URLField(source='get_absolute_url')
, or may use dotted notation to traverse attributes, such as EmailField(source='user.email')
. When serializing fields with dotted notation, it may be necessary to provide a default
value if any object is not present or is empty during attribute traversal.
The value source='*'
has a special meaning, and is used to indicate that the entire object should be passed through to the field. This can be useful for creating nested representations, or for fields which require access to the complete object in order to determine the output representation.
Defaults to the name of the field.
+validators
A list of validator functions which should be applied to the incoming field input, and which either raise a validation error or simply return. Validator functions should typically raise serializers.ValidationError
, but Django's built-in ValidationError
is also supported for compatibility with validators defined in the Django codebase or third party Django packages.
error_messages
A dictionary of error codes to error messages.
+label
A short text string that may be used as the name of the field in HTML form fields or other descriptive elements.
+help_text
A text string that may be used as a description of the field in HTML form fields or other descriptive elements.
+initial
A value that should be used for pre-populating the value of HTML form fields. You may pass a callable to it, just as
+you may do with any regular Django Field
:
import datetime
+from rest_framework import serializers
+class ExampleSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
+ day = serializers.DateField(initial=datetime.date.today)
+
+style
A dictionary of key-value pairs that can be used to control how renderers should render the field.
+Two examples here are 'input_type'
and 'base_template'
:
# Use <input type="password"> for the input.
+password = serializers.CharField(
+ style={'input_type': 'password'}
+)
+
+# Use a radio input instead of a select input.
+color_channel = serializers.ChoiceField(
+ choices=['red', 'green', 'blue'],
+ style={'base_template': 'radio.html'}
+)
+
+For more details see the HTML & Forms documentation.
+A boolean representation.
+When using HTML encoded form input be aware that omitting a value will always be treated as setting a field to False
, even if it has a default=True
option specified. This is because HTML checkbox inputs represent the unchecked state by omitting the value, so REST framework treats omission as if it is an empty checkbox input.
Note that Django 2.1 removed the blank
kwarg from models.BooleanField
.
+Prior to Django 2.1 models.BooleanField
fields were always blank=True
. Thus
+since Django 2.1 default serializers.BooleanField
instances will be generated
+without the required
kwarg (i.e. equivalent to required=True
) whereas with
+previous versions of Django, default BooleanField
instances will be generated
+with a required=False
option. If you want to control this behaviour manually,
+explicitly declare the BooleanField
on the serializer class, or use the
+extra_kwargs
option to set the required
flag.
Corresponds to django.db.models.fields.BooleanField
.
Signature: BooleanField()
A boolean representation that also accepts None
as a valid value.
Corresponds to django.db.models.fields.NullBooleanField
.
Signature: NullBooleanField()
A text representation. Optionally validates the text to be shorter than max_length
and longer than min_length
.
Corresponds to django.db.models.fields.CharField
or django.db.models.fields.TextField
.
Signature: CharField(max_length=None, min_length=None, allow_blank=False, trim_whitespace=True)
max_length
- Validates that the input contains no more than this number of characters.min_length
- Validates that the input contains no fewer than this number of characters.allow_blank
- If set to True
then the empty string should be considered a valid value. If set to False
then the empty string is considered invalid and will raise a validation error. Defaults to False
.trim_whitespace
- If set to True
then leading and trailing whitespace is trimmed. Defaults to True
.The allow_null
option is also available for string fields, although its usage is discouraged in favor of allow_blank
. It is valid to set both allow_blank=True
and allow_null=True
, but doing so means that there will be two differing types of empty value permissible for string representations, which can lead to data inconsistencies and subtle application bugs.
A text representation, validates the text to be a valid e-mail address.
+Corresponds to django.db.models.fields.EmailField
Signature: EmailField(max_length=None, min_length=None, allow_blank=False)
A text representation, that validates the given value matches against a certain regular expression.
+Corresponds to django.forms.fields.RegexField
.
Signature: RegexField(regex, max_length=None, min_length=None, allow_blank=False)
The mandatory regex
argument may either be a string, or a compiled python regular expression object.
Uses Django's django.core.validators.RegexValidator
for validation.
A RegexField
that validates the input against the pattern [a-zA-Z0-9_-]+
.
Corresponds to django.db.models.fields.SlugField
.
Signature: SlugField(max_length=50, min_length=None, allow_blank=False)
A RegexField
that validates the input against a URL matching pattern. Expects fully qualified URLs of the form http://<host>/<path>
.
Corresponds to django.db.models.fields.URLField
. Uses Django's django.core.validators.URLValidator
for validation.
Signature: URLField(max_length=200, min_length=None, allow_blank=False)
A field that ensures the input is a valid UUID string. The to_internal_value
method will return a uuid.UUID
instance. On output the field will return a string in the canonical hyphenated format, for example:
"de305d54-75b4-431b-adb2-eb6b9e546013"
+
+Signature: UUIDField(format='hex_verbose')
format
: Determines the representation format of the uuid value'hex_verbose'
- The canonical hex representation, including hyphens: "5ce0e9a5-5ffa-654b-cee0-1238041fb31a"
'hex'
- The compact hex representation of the UUID, not including hyphens: "5ce0e9a55ffa654bcee01238041fb31a"
'int'
- A 128 bit integer representation of the UUID: "123456789012312313134124512351145145114"
'urn'
- RFC 4122 URN representation of the UUID: "urn:uuid:5ce0e9a5-5ffa-654b-cee0-1238041fb31a"
+ Changing the format
parameters only affects representation values. All formats are accepted by to_internal_value
A field whose choices are limited to the filenames in a certain directory on the filesystem
+Corresponds to django.forms.fields.FilePathField
.
Signature: FilePathField(path, match=None, recursive=False, allow_files=True, allow_folders=False, required=None, **kwargs)
path
- The absolute filesystem path to a directory from which this FilePathField should get its choice.match
- A regular expression, as a string, that FilePathField will use to filter filenames.recursive
- Specifies whether all subdirectories of path should be included. Default is False
.allow_files
- Specifies whether files in the specified location should be included. Default is True
. Either this or allow_folders
must be True
.allow_folders
- Specifies whether folders in the specified location should be included. Default is False
. Either this or allow_files
must be True
.A field that ensures the input is a valid IPv4 or IPv6 string.
+Corresponds to django.forms.fields.IPAddressField
and django.forms.fields.GenericIPAddressField
.
Signature: IPAddressField(protocol='both', unpack_ipv4=False, **options)
protocol
Limits valid inputs to the specified protocol. Accepted values are 'both' (default), 'IPv4' or 'IPv6'. Matching is case insensitive.unpack_ipv4
Unpacks IPv4 mapped addresses like ::ffff:192.0.2.1. If this option is enabled that address would be unpacked to 192.0.2.1. Default is disabled. Can only be used when protocol is set to 'both'.An integer representation.
+Corresponds to django.db.models.fields.IntegerField
, django.db.models.fields.SmallIntegerField
, django.db.models.fields.PositiveIntegerField
and django.db.models.fields.PositiveSmallIntegerField
.
Signature: IntegerField(max_value=None, min_value=None)
max_value
Validate that the number provided is no greater than this value.min_value
Validate that the number provided is no less than this value.A floating point representation.
+Corresponds to django.db.models.fields.FloatField
.
Signature: FloatField(max_value=None, min_value=None)
max_value
Validate that the number provided is no greater than this value.min_value
Validate that the number provided is no less than this value.A decimal representation, represented in Python by a Decimal
instance.
Corresponds to django.db.models.fields.DecimalField
.
Signature: DecimalField(max_digits, decimal_places, coerce_to_string=None, max_value=None, min_value=None)
max_digits
The maximum number of digits allowed in the number. It must be either None
or an integer greater than or equal to decimal_places
.decimal_places
The number of decimal places to store with the number.coerce_to_string
Set to True
if string values should be returned for the representation, or False
if Decimal
objects should be returned. Defaults to the same value as the COERCE_DECIMAL_TO_STRING
settings key, which will be True
unless overridden. If Decimal
objects are returned by the serializer, then the final output format will be determined by the renderer. Note that setting localize
will force the value to True
.max_value
Validate that the number provided is no greater than this value.min_value
Validate that the number provided is no less than this value.localize
Set to True
to enable localization of input and output based on the current locale. This will also force coerce_to_string
to True
. Defaults to False
. Note that data formatting is enabled if you have set USE_L10N=True
in your settings file.rounding
Sets the rounding mode used when quantising to the configured precision. Valid values are decimal
module rounding modes. Defaults to None
.To validate numbers up to 999 with a resolution of 2 decimal places, you would use:
+serializers.DecimalField(max_digits=5, decimal_places=2)
+
+And to validate numbers up to anything less than one billion with a resolution of 10 decimal places:
+serializers.DecimalField(max_digits=19, decimal_places=10)
+
+This field also takes an optional argument, coerce_to_string
. If set to True
the representation will be output as a string. If set to False
the representation will be left as a Decimal
instance and the final representation will be determined by the renderer.
If unset, this will default to the same value as the COERCE_DECIMAL_TO_STRING
setting, which is True
unless set otherwise.
A date and time representation.
+Corresponds to django.db.models.fields.DateTimeField
.
Signature: DateTimeField(format=api_settings.DATETIME_FORMAT, input_formats=None, default_timezone=None)
format
- A string representing the output format. If not specified, this defaults to the same value as the DATETIME_FORMAT
settings key, which will be 'iso-8601'
unless set. Setting to a format string indicates that to_representation
return values should be coerced to string output. Format strings are described below. Setting this value to None
indicates that Python datetime
objects should be returned by to_representation
. In this case the datetime encoding will be determined by the renderer.input_formats
- A list of strings representing the input formats which may be used to parse the date. If not specified, the DATETIME_INPUT_FORMATS
setting will be used, which defaults to ['iso-8601']
.default_timezone
- A pytz.timezone
representing the timezone. If not specified and the USE_TZ
setting is enabled, this defaults to the current timezone. If USE_TZ
is disabled, then datetime objects will be naive.DateTimeField
format strings.Format strings may either be Python strftime formats which explicitly specify the format, or the special string 'iso-8601'
, which indicates that ISO 8601 style datetimes should be used. (eg '2013-01-29T12:34:56.000000Z'
)
When a value of None
is used for the format datetime
objects will be returned by to_representation
and the final output representation will determined by the renderer class.
auto_now
and auto_now_add
model fields.When using ModelSerializer
or HyperlinkedModelSerializer
, note that any model fields with auto_now=True
or auto_now_add=True
will use serializer fields that are read_only=True
by default.
If you want to override this behavior, you'll need to declare the DateTimeField
explicitly on the serializer. For example:
class CommentSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+ created = serializers.DateTimeField()
+
+ class Meta:
+ model = Comment
+
+A date representation.
+Corresponds to django.db.models.fields.DateField
Signature: DateField(format=api_settings.DATE_FORMAT, input_formats=None)
format
- A string representing the output format. If not specified, this defaults to the same value as the DATE_FORMAT
settings key, which will be 'iso-8601'
unless set. Setting to a format string indicates that to_representation
return values should be coerced to string output. Format strings are described below. Setting this value to None
indicates that Python date
objects should be returned by to_representation
. In this case the date encoding will be determined by the renderer.input_formats
- A list of strings representing the input formats which may be used to parse the date. If not specified, the DATE_INPUT_FORMATS
setting will be used, which defaults to ['iso-8601']
.DateField
format stringsFormat strings may either be Python strftime formats which explicitly specify the format, or the special string 'iso-8601'
, which indicates that ISO 8601 style dates should be used. (eg '2013-01-29'
)
A time representation.
+Corresponds to django.db.models.fields.TimeField
Signature: TimeField(format=api_settings.TIME_FORMAT, input_formats=None)
format
- A string representing the output format. If not specified, this defaults to the same value as the TIME_FORMAT
settings key, which will be 'iso-8601'
unless set. Setting to a format string indicates that to_representation
return values should be coerced to string output. Format strings are described below. Setting this value to None
indicates that Python time
objects should be returned by to_representation
. In this case the time encoding will be determined by the renderer.input_formats
- A list of strings representing the input formats which may be used to parse the date. If not specified, the TIME_INPUT_FORMATS
setting will be used, which defaults to ['iso-8601']
.TimeField
format stringsFormat strings may either be Python strftime formats which explicitly specify the format, or the special string 'iso-8601'
, which indicates that ISO 8601 style times should be used. (eg '12:34:56.000000'
)
A Duration representation.
+Corresponds to django.db.models.fields.DurationField
The validated_data
for these fields will contain a datetime.timedelta
instance.
+The representation is a string following this format '[DD] [HH:[MM:]]ss[.uuuuuu]'
.
Signature: DurationField(max_value=None, min_value=None)
max_value
Validate that the duration provided is no greater than this value.min_value
Validate that the duration provided is no less than this value.A field that can accept a value out of a limited set of choices.
+Used by ModelSerializer
to automatically generate fields if the corresponding model field includes a choices=…
argument.
Signature: ChoiceField(choices)
choices
- A list of valid values, or a list of (key, display_name)
tuples.allow_blank
- If set to True
then the empty string should be considered a valid value. If set to False
then the empty string is considered invalid and will raise a validation error. Defaults to False
.html_cutoff
- If set this will be the maximum number of choices that will be displayed by a HTML select drop down. Can be used to ensure that automatically generated ChoiceFields with very large possible selections do not prevent a template from rendering. Defaults to None
.html_cutoff_text
- If set this will display a textual indicator if the maximum number of items have been cutoff in an HTML select drop down. Defaults to "More than {count} items…"
Both the allow_blank
and allow_null
are valid options on ChoiceField
, although it is highly recommended that you only use one and not both. allow_blank
should be preferred for textual choices, and allow_null
should be preferred for numeric or other non-textual choices.
A field that can accept a set of zero, one or many values, chosen from a limited set of choices. Takes a single mandatory argument. to_internal_value
returns a set
containing the selected values.
Signature: MultipleChoiceField(choices)
choices
- A list of valid values, or a list of (key, display_name)
tuples.allow_blank
- If set to True
then the empty string should be considered a valid value. If set to False
then the empty string is considered invalid and will raise a validation error. Defaults to False
.html_cutoff
- If set this will be the maximum number of choices that will be displayed by a HTML select drop down. Can be used to ensure that automatically generated ChoiceFields with very large possible selections do not prevent a template from rendering. Defaults to None
.html_cutoff_text
- If set this will display a textual indicator if the maximum number of items have been cutoff in an HTML select drop down. Defaults to "More than {count} items…"
As with ChoiceField
, both the allow_blank
and allow_null
options are valid, although it is highly recommended that you only use one and not both. allow_blank
should be preferred for textual choices, and allow_null
should be preferred for numeric or other non-textual choices.
The FileField
and ImageField
classes are only suitable for use with MultiPartParser
or FileUploadParser
. Most parsers, such as e.g. JSON don't support file uploads.
+Django's regular FILE_UPLOAD_HANDLERS are used for handling uploaded files.
A file representation. Performs Django's standard FileField validation.
+Corresponds to django.forms.fields.FileField
.
Signature: FileField(max_length=None, allow_empty_file=False, use_url=UPLOADED_FILES_USE_URL)
max_length
- Designates the maximum length for the file name.allow_empty_file
- Designates if empty files are allowed.use_url
- If set to True
then URL string values will be used for the output representation. If set to False
then filename string values will be used for the output representation. Defaults to the value of the UPLOADED_FILES_USE_URL
settings key, which is True
unless set otherwise.An image representation. Validates the uploaded file content as matching a known image format.
+Corresponds to django.forms.fields.ImageField
.
Signature: ImageField(max_length=None, allow_empty_file=False, use_url=UPLOADED_FILES_USE_URL)
max_length
- Designates the maximum length for the file name.allow_empty_file
- Designates if empty files are allowed.use_url
- If set to True
then URL string values will be used for the output representation. If set to False
then filename string values will be used for the output representation. Defaults to the value of the UPLOADED_FILES_USE_URL
settings key, which is True
unless set otherwise.Requires either the Pillow
package or PIL
package. The Pillow
package is recommended, as PIL
is no longer actively maintained.
A field class that validates a list of objects.
+Signature: ListField(child=<A_FIELD_INSTANCE>, allow_empty=True, min_length=None, max_length=None)
child
- A field instance that should be used for validating the objects in the list. If this argument is not provided then objects in the list will not be validated.allow_empty
- Designates if empty lists are allowed.min_length
- Validates that the list contains no fewer than this number of elements.max_length
- Validates that the list contains no more than this number of elements.For example, to validate a list of integers you might use something like the following:
+scores = serializers.ListField(
+ child=serializers.IntegerField(min_value=0, max_value=100)
+)
+
+The ListField
class also supports a declarative style that allows you to write reusable list field classes.
class StringListField(serializers.ListField):
+ child = serializers.CharField()
+
+We can now reuse our custom StringListField
class throughout our application, without having to provide a child
argument to it.
A field class that validates a dictionary of objects. The keys in DictField
are always assumed to be string values.
Signature: DictField(child=<A_FIELD_INSTANCE>, allow_empty=True)
child
- A field instance that should be used for validating the values in the dictionary. If this argument is not provided then values in the mapping will not be validated.allow_empty
- Designates if empty dictionaries are allowed.For example, to create a field that validates a mapping of strings to strings, you would write something like this:
+document = DictField(child=CharField())
+
+You can also use the declarative style, as with ListField
. For example:
class DocumentField(DictField):
+ child = CharField()
+
+A preconfigured DictField
that is compatible with Django's postgres HStoreField
.
Signature: HStoreField(child=<A_FIELD_INSTANCE>, allow_empty=True)
child
- A field instance that is used for validating the values in the dictionary. The default child field accepts both empty strings and null values.allow_empty
- Designates if empty dictionaries are allowed.Note that the child field must be an instance of CharField
, as the hstore extension stores values as strings.
A field class that validates that the incoming data structure consists of valid JSON primitives. In its alternate binary mode, it will represent and validate JSON-encoded binary strings.
+Signature: JSONField(binary, encoder)
binary
- If set to True
then the field will output and validate a JSON encoded string, rather than a primitive data structure. Defaults to False
.encoder
- Use this JSON encoder to serialize input object. Defaults to None
.A field class that simply returns the value of the field without modification.
+This field is used by default with ModelSerializer
when including field names that relate to an attribute rather than a model field.
Signature: ReadOnlyField()
For example, if has_expired
was a property on the Account
model, then the following serializer would automatically generate it as a ReadOnlyField
:
class AccountSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+ class Meta:
+ model = Account
+ fields = ['id', 'account_name', 'has_expired']
+
+A field class that does not take a value based on user input, but instead takes its value from a default value or callable.
+Signature: HiddenField()
For example, to include a field that always provides the current time as part of the serializer validated data, you would use the following:
+modified = serializers.HiddenField(default=timezone.now)
+
+The HiddenField
class is usually only needed if you have some validation that needs to run based on some pre-provided field values, but you do not want to expose all of those fields to the end user.
For further examples on HiddenField
see the validators documentation.
A generic field that can be tied to any arbitrary model field. The ModelField
class delegates the task of serialization/deserialization to its associated model field. This field can be used to create serializer fields for custom model fields, without having to create a new custom serializer field.
This field is used by ModelSerializer
to correspond to custom model field classes.
Signature: ModelField(model_field=<Django ModelField instance>)
The ModelField
class is generally intended for internal use, but can be used by your API if needed. In order to properly instantiate a ModelField
, it must be passed a field that is attached to an instantiated model. For example: ModelField(model_field=MyModel()._meta.get_field('custom_field'))
This is a read-only field. It gets its value by calling a method on the serializer class it is attached to. It can be used to add any sort of data to the serialized representation of your object.
+Signature: SerializerMethodField(method_name=None)
method_name
- The name of the method on the serializer to be called. If not included this defaults to get_<field_name>
.The serializer method referred to by the method_name
argument should accept a single argument (in addition to self
), which is the object being serialized. It should return whatever you want to be included in the serialized representation of the object. For example:
from django.contrib.auth.models import User
+from django.utils.timezone import now
+from rest_framework import serializers
+
+class UserSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+ days_since_joined = serializers.SerializerMethodField()
+
+ class Meta:
+ model = User
+
+ def get_days_since_joined(self, obj):
+ return (now() - obj.date_joined).days
+
+If you want to create a custom field, you'll need to subclass Field
and then override either one or both of the .to_representation()
and .to_internal_value()
methods. These two methods are used to convert between the initial datatype, and a primitive, serializable datatype. Primitive datatypes will typically be any of a number, string, boolean, date
/time
/datetime
or None
. They may also be any list or dictionary like object that only contains other primitive objects. Other types might be supported, depending on the renderer that you are using.
The .to_representation()
method is called to convert the initial datatype into a primitive, serializable datatype.
The to_internal_value()
method is called to restore a primitive datatype into its internal python representation. This method should raise a serializers.ValidationError
if the data is invalid.
Note that the WritableField
class that was present in version 2.x no longer exists. You should subclass Field
and override to_internal_value()
if the field supports data input.
Let's look at an example of serializing a class that represents an RGB color value:
+class Color(object):
+ """
+ A color represented in the RGB colorspace.
+ """
+ def __init__(self, red, green, blue):
+ assert(red >= 0 and green >= 0 and blue >= 0)
+ assert(red < 256 and green < 256 and blue < 256)
+ self.red, self.green, self.blue = red, green, blue
+
+class ColorField(serializers.Field):
+ """
+ Color objects are serialized into 'rgb(#, #, #)' notation.
+ """
+ def to_representation(self, value):
+ return "rgb(%d, %d, %d)" % (value.red, value.green, value.blue)
+
+ def to_internal_value(self, data):
+ data = data.strip('rgb(').rstrip(')')
+ red, green, blue = [int(col) for col in data.split(',')]
+ return Color(red, green, blue)
+
+By default field values are treated as mapping to an attribute on the object. If you need to customize how the field value is accessed and set you need to override .get_attribute()
and/or .get_value()
.
As an example, let's create a field that can be used to represent the class name of the object being serialized:
+class ClassNameField(serializers.Field):
+ def get_attribute(self, instance):
+ # We pass the object instance onto `to_representation`,
+ # not just the field attribute.
+ return instance
+
+ def to_representation(self, value):
+ """
+ Serialize the value's class name.
+ """
+ return value.__class__.__name__
+
+Our ColorField
class above currently does not perform any data validation.
+To indicate invalid data, we should raise a serializers.ValidationError
, like so:
def to_internal_value(self, data):
+ if not isinstance(data, str):
+ msg = 'Incorrect type. Expected a string, but got %s'
+ raise ValidationError(msg % type(data).__name__)
+
+ if not re.match(r'^rgb\([0-9]+,[0-9]+,[0-9]+\)$', data):
+ raise ValidationError('Incorrect format. Expected `rgb(#,#,#)`.')
+
+ data = data.strip('rgb(').rstrip(')')
+ red, green, blue = [int(col) for col in data.split(',')]
+
+ if any([col > 255 or col < 0 for col in (red, green, blue)]):
+ raise ValidationError('Value out of range. Must be between 0 and 255.')
+
+ return Color(red, green, blue)
+
+The .fail()
method is a shortcut for raising ValidationError
that takes a message string from the error_messages
dictionary. For example:
default_error_messages = {
+ 'incorrect_type': 'Incorrect type. Expected a string, but got {input_type}',
+ 'incorrect_format': 'Incorrect format. Expected `rgb(#,#,#)`.',
+ 'out_of_range': 'Value out of range. Must be between 0 and 255.'
+}
+
+def to_internal_value(self, data):
+ if not isinstance(data, str):
+ self.fail('incorrect_type', input_type=type(data).__name__)
+
+ if not re.match(r'^rgb\([0-9]+,[0-9]+,[0-9]+\)$', data):
+ self.fail('incorrect_format')
+
+ data = data.strip('rgb(').rstrip(')')
+ red, green, blue = [int(col) for col in data.split(',')]
+
+ if any([col > 255 or col < 0 for col in (red, green, blue)]):
+ self.fail('out_of_range')
+
+ return Color(red, green, blue)
+
+This style keeps your error messages cleaner and more separated from your code, and should be preferred.
+source='*'
Here we'll take an example of a flat DataPoint
model with x_coordinate
and y_coordinate
attributes.
class DataPoint(models.Model):
+ label = models.CharField(max_length=50)
+ x_coordinate = models.SmallIntegerField()
+ y_coordinate = models.SmallIntegerField()
+
+Using a custom field and source='*'
we can provide a nested representation of
+the coordinate pair:
class CoordinateField(serializers.Field):
+
+ def to_representation(self, value):
+ ret = {
+ "x": value.x_coordinate,
+ "y": value.y_coordinate
+ }
+ return ret
+
+ def to_internal_value(self, data):
+ ret = {
+ "x_coordinate": data["x"],
+ "y_coordinate": data["y"],
+ }
+ return ret
+
+
+class DataPointSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+ coordinates = CoordinateField(source='*')
+
+ class Meta:
+ model = DataPoint
+ fields = ['label', 'coordinates']
+
+Note that this example doesn't handle validation. Partly for that reason, in a
+real project, the coordinate nesting might be better handled with a nested serializer
+using source='*'
, with two IntegerField
instances, each with their own source
+pointing to the relevant field.
The key points from the example, though, are:
+to_representation
is passed the entire DataPoint
object and must map from that
+to the desired output.
>>> instance = DataPoint(label='Example', x_coordinate=1, y_coordinate=2)
+>>> out_serializer = DataPointSerializer(instance)
+>>> out_serializer.data
+ReturnDict([('label', 'Example'), ('coordinates', {'x': 1, 'y': 2})])
+
+Unless our field is to be read-only, to_internal_value
must map back to a dict
+suitable for updating our target object. With source='*'
, the return from
+to_internal_value
will update the root validated data dictionary, rather than a single key.
>>> data = {
+... "label": "Second Example",
+... "coordinates": {
+... "x": 3,
+... "y": 4,
+... }
+... }
+>>> in_serializer = DataPointSerializer(data=data)
+>>> in_serializer.is_valid()
+True
+>>> in_serializer.validated_data
+OrderedDict([('label', 'Second Example'),
+ ('y_coordinate', 4),
+ ('x_coordinate', 3)])
+
+For completeness lets do the same thing again but with the nested serializer +approach suggested above:
+class NestedCoordinateSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
+ x = serializers.IntegerField(source='x_coordinate')
+ y = serializers.IntegerField(source='y_coordinate')
+
+
+class DataPointSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+ coordinates = NestedCoordinateSerializer(source='*')
+
+ class Meta:
+ model = DataPoint
+ fields = ['label', 'coordinates']
+
+Here the mapping between the target and source attribute pairs (x
and
+x_coordinate
, y
and y_coordinate
) is handled in the IntegerField
+declarations. It's our NestedCoordinateSerializer
that takes source='*'
.
Our new DataPointSerializer
exhibits the same behaviour as the custom field
+approach.
Serializing:
+>>> out_serializer = DataPointSerializer(instance)
+>>> out_serializer.data
+ReturnDict([('label', 'testing'),
+ ('coordinates', OrderedDict([('x', 1), ('y', 2)]))])
+
+Deserializing:
+>>> in_serializer = DataPointSerializer(data=data)
+>>> in_serializer.is_valid()
+True
+>>> in_serializer.validated_data
+OrderedDict([('label', 'still testing'),
+ ('x_coordinate', 3),
+ ('y_coordinate', 4)])
+
+But we also get the built-in validation for free:
+>>> invalid_data = {
+... "label": "still testing",
+... "coordinates": {
+... "x": 'a',
+... "y": 'b',
+... }
+... }
+>>> invalid_serializer = DataPointSerializer(data=invalid_data)
+>>> invalid_serializer.is_valid()
+False
+>>> invalid_serializer.errors
+ReturnDict([('coordinates',
+ {'x': ['A valid integer is required.'],
+ 'y': ['A valid integer is required.']})])
+
+For this reason, the nested serializer approach would be the first to try. You +would use the custom field approach when the nested serializer becomes infeasible +or overly complex.
+The following third party packages are also available.
+The drf-compound-fields package provides "compound" serializer fields, such as lists of simple values, which can be described by other fields rather than serializers with the many=True
option. Also provided are fields for typed dictionaries and values that can be either a specific type or a list of items of that type.
The drf-extra-fields package provides extra serializer fields for REST framework, including Base64ImageField
and PointField
classes.
the djangorestframework-recursive package provides a RecursiveField
for serializing and deserializing recursive structures
The django-rest-framework-gis package provides geographic addons for django rest framework like a GeometryField
field and a GeoJSON serializer.
The django-rest-framework-hstore package provides an HStoreField
to support django-hstore DictionaryField
model field.
++The root QuerySet provided by the Manager describes all objects in the database table. Usually, though, you'll need to select only a subset of the complete set of objects.
+ +
The default behavior of REST framework's generic list views is to return the entire queryset for a model manager. Often you will want your API to restrict the items that are returned by the queryset.
+The simplest way to filter the queryset of any view that subclasses GenericAPIView
is to override the .get_queryset()
method.
Overriding this method allows you to customize the queryset returned by the view in a number of different ways.
+You might want to filter the queryset to ensure that only results relevant to the currently authenticated user making the request are returned.
+You can do so by filtering based on the value of request.user
.
For example:
+from myapp.models import Purchase
+from myapp.serializers import PurchaseSerializer
+from rest_framework import generics
+
+class PurchaseList(generics.ListAPIView):
+ serializer_class = PurchaseSerializer
+
+ def get_queryset(self):
+ """
+ This view should return a list of all the purchases
+ for the currently authenticated user.
+ """
+ user = self.request.user
+ return Purchase.objects.filter(purchaser=user)
+
+Another style of filtering might involve restricting the queryset based on some part of the URL.
+For example if your URL config contained an entry like this:
+url('^purchases/(?P<username>.+)/$', PurchaseList.as_view()),
+
+You could then write a view that returned a purchase queryset filtered by the username portion of the URL:
+class PurchaseList(generics.ListAPIView):
+ serializer_class = PurchaseSerializer
+
+ def get_queryset(self):
+ """
+ This view should return a list of all the purchases for
+ the user as determined by the username portion of the URL.
+ """
+ username = self.kwargs['username']
+ return Purchase.objects.filter(purchaser__username=username)
+
+A final example of filtering the initial queryset would be to determine the initial queryset based on query parameters in the url.
+We can override .get_queryset()
to deal with URLs such as http://example.com/api/purchases?username=denvercoder9
, and filter the queryset only if the username
parameter is included in the URL:
class PurchaseList(generics.ListAPIView):
+ serializer_class = PurchaseSerializer
+
+ def get_queryset(self):
+ """
+ Optionally restricts the returned purchases to a given user,
+ by filtering against a `username` query parameter in the URL.
+ """
+ queryset = Purchase.objects.all()
+ username = self.request.query_params.get('username', None)
+ if username is not None:
+ queryset = queryset.filter(purchaser__username=username)
+ return queryset
+
+As well as being able to override the default queryset, REST framework also includes support for generic filtering backends that allow you to easily construct complex searches and filters.
+Generic filters can also present themselves as HTML controls in the browsable API and admin API.
+ +The default filter backends may be set globally, using the DEFAULT_FILTER_BACKENDS
setting. For example.
REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ 'DEFAULT_FILTER_BACKENDS': ['django_filters.rest_framework.DjangoFilterBackend']
+}
+
+You can also set the filter backends on a per-view, or per-viewset basis,
+using the GenericAPIView
class-based views.
import django_filters.rest_framework
+from django.contrib.auth.models import User
+from myapp.serializers import UserSerializer
+from rest_framework import generics
+
+class UserListView(generics.ListAPIView):
+ queryset = User.objects.all()
+ serializer_class = UserSerializer
+ filter_backends = [django_filters.rest_framework.DjangoFilterBackend]
+
+Note that if a filter backend is configured for a view, then as well as being used to filter list views, it will also be used to filter the querysets used for returning a single object.
+For instance, given the previous example, and a product with an id of 4675
, the following URL would either return the corresponding object, or return a 404 response, depending on if the filtering conditions were met by the given product instance:
http://example.com/api/products/4675/?category=clothing&max_price=10.00
+
+Note that you can use both an overridden .get_queryset()
and generic filtering together, and everything will work as expected. For example, if Product
had a many-to-many relationship with User
, named purchase
, you might want to write a view like this:
class PurchasedProductsList(generics.ListAPIView):
+ """
+ Return a list of all the products that the authenticated
+ user has ever purchased, with optional filtering.
+ """
+ model = Product
+ serializer_class = ProductSerializer
+ filterset_class = ProductFilter
+
+ def get_queryset(self):
+ user = self.request.user
+ return user.purchase_set.all()
+
+The django-filter
library includes a DjangoFilterBackend
class which
+supports highly customizable field filtering for REST framework.
To use DjangoFilterBackend
, first install django-filter
. Then add django_filters
to Django's INSTALLED_APPS
pip install django-filter
+
+You should now either add the filter backend to your settings:
+REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ 'DEFAULT_FILTER_BACKENDS': ['django_filters.rest_framework.DjangoFilterBackend']
+}
+
+Or add the filter backend to an individual View or ViewSet.
+from django_filters.rest_framework import DjangoFilterBackend
+
+class UserListView(generics.ListAPIView):
+ ...
+ filter_backends = [DjangoFilterBackend]
+
+If all you need is simple equality-based filtering, you can set a filterset_fields
attribute on the view, or viewset, listing the set of fields you wish to filter against.
class ProductList(generics.ListAPIView):
+ queryset = Product.objects.all()
+ serializer_class = ProductSerializer
+ filter_backends = [DjangoFilterBackend]
+ filterset_fields = ['category', 'in_stock']
+
+This will automatically create a FilterSet
class for the given fields, and will allow you to make requests such as:
http://example.com/api/products?category=clothing&in_stock=True
+
+For more advanced filtering requirements you can specify a FilterSet
class that should be used by the view.
+You can read more about FilterSet
s in the django-filter documentation.
+It's also recommended that you read the section on DRF integration.
The SearchFilter
class supports simple single query parameter based searching, and is based on the Django admin's search functionality.
When in use, the browsable API will include a SearchFilter
control:
The SearchFilter
class will only be applied if the view has a search_fields
attribute set. The search_fields
attribute should be a list of names of text type fields on the model, such as CharField
or TextField
.
from rest_framework import filters
+
+class UserListView(generics.ListAPIView):
+ queryset = User.objects.all()
+ serializer_class = UserSerializer
+ filter_backends = [filters.SearchFilter]
+ search_fields = ['username', 'email']
+
+This will allow the client to filter the items in the list by making queries such as:
+http://example.com/api/users?search=russell
+
+You can also perform a related lookup on a ForeignKey or ManyToManyField with the lookup API double-underscore notation:
+search_fields = ['username', 'email', 'profile__profession']
+
+By default, searches will use case-insensitive partial matches. The search parameter may contain multiple search terms, which should be whitespace and/or comma separated. If multiple search terms are used then objects will be returned in the list only if all the provided terms are matched.
+The search behavior may be restricted by prepending various characters to the search_fields
.
For example:
+search_fields = ['=username', '=email']
+
+By default, the search parameter is named 'search'
, but this may be overridden with the SEARCH_PARAM
setting.
To dynamically change search fields based on request content, it's possible to subclass the SearchFilter
and override the get_search_fields()
function. For example, the following subclass will only search on title
if the query parameter title_only
is in the request:
from rest_framework import filters
+
+class CustomSearchFilter(filters.SearchFilter):
+ def get_search_fields(self, view, request):
+ if request.query_params.get('title_only'):
+ return ['title']
+ return super(CustomSearchFilter, self).get_search_fields(view, request)
+
+For more details, see the Django documentation.
+The OrderingFilter
class supports simple query parameter controlled ordering of results.
By default, the query parameter is named 'ordering'
, but this may by overridden with the ORDERING_PARAM
setting.
For example, to order users by username:
+http://example.com/api/users?ordering=username
+
+The client may also specify reverse orderings by prefixing the field name with '-', like so:
+http://example.com/api/users?ordering=-username
+
+Multiple orderings may also be specified:
+http://example.com/api/users?ordering=account,username
+
+It's recommended that you explicitly specify which fields the API should allowing in the ordering filter. You can do this by setting an ordering_fields
attribute on the view, like so:
class UserListView(generics.ListAPIView):
+ queryset = User.objects.all()
+ serializer_class = UserSerializer
+ filter_backends = [filters.OrderingFilter]
+ ordering_fields = ['username', 'email']
+
+This helps prevent unexpected data leakage, such as allowing users to order against a password hash field or other sensitive data.
+If you don't specify an ordering_fields
attribute on the view, the filter class will default to allowing the user to filter on any readable fields on the serializer specified by the serializer_class
attribute.
If you are confident that the queryset being used by the view doesn't contain any sensitive data, you can also explicitly specify that a view should allow ordering on any model field or queryset aggregate, by using the special value '__all__'
.
class BookingsListView(generics.ListAPIView):
+ queryset = Booking.objects.all()
+ serializer_class = BookingSerializer
+ filter_backends = [filters.OrderingFilter]
+ ordering_fields = '__all__'
+
+If an ordering
attribute is set on the view, this will be used as the default ordering.
Typically you'd instead control this by setting order_by
on the initial queryset, but using the ordering
parameter on the view allows you to specify the ordering in a way that it can then be passed automatically as context to a rendered template. This makes it possible to automatically render column headers differently if they are being used to order the results.
class UserListView(generics.ListAPIView):
+ queryset = User.objects.all()
+ serializer_class = UserSerializer
+ filter_backends = [filters.OrderingFilter]
+ ordering_fields = ['username', 'email']
+ ordering = ['username']
+
+The ordering
attribute may be either a string or a list/tuple of strings.
You can also provide your own generic filtering backend, or write an installable app for other developers to use.
+To do so override BaseFilterBackend
, and override the .filter_queryset(self, request, queryset, view)
method. The method should return a new, filtered queryset.
As well as allowing clients to perform searches and filtering, generic filter backends can be useful for restricting which objects should be visible to any given request or user.
+For example, you might need to restrict users to only being able to see objects they created.
+class IsOwnerFilterBackend(filters.BaseFilterBackend):
+ """
+ Filter that only allows users to see their own objects.
+ """
+ def filter_queryset(self, request, queryset, view):
+ return queryset.filter(owner=request.user)
+
+We could achieve the same behavior by overriding get_queryset()
on the views, but using a filter backend allows you to more easily add this restriction to multiple views, or to apply it across the entire API.
Generic filters may also present an interface in the browsable API. To do so you should implement a to_html()
method which returns a rendered HTML representation of the filter. This method should have the following signature:
to_html(self, request, queryset, view)
The method should return a rendered HTML string.
+You can also make the filter controls available to the schema autogeneration
+that REST framework provides, by implementing a get_schema_fields()
method. This method should have the following signature:
get_schema_fields(self, view)
The method should return a list of coreapi.Field
instances.
The following third party packages provide additional filter implementations.
+The django-rest-framework-filters package works together with the DjangoFilterBackend
class, and allows you to easily create filters across relationships, or create multiple filter lookup types for a given field.
The djangorestframework-word-filter developed as alternative to filters.SearchFilter
which will search full word in text, or exact match.
django-url-filter provides a safe way to filter data via human-friendly URLs. It works very similar to DRF serializers and fields in a sense that they can be nested except they are called filtersets and filters. That provides easy way to filter related data. Also this library is generic-purpose so it can be used to filter other sources of data and not only Django QuerySet
s.
drf-url-filter is a simple Django app to apply filters on drf ModelViewSet
's Queryset
in a clean, simple and configurable way. It also supports validations on incoming query params and their values. A beautiful python package Voluptuous
is being used for validations on the incoming query parameters. The best part about voluptuous is you can define your own validations as per your query params requirements.
++Section 6.2.1 does not say that content negotiation should be +used all the time.
+— Roy Fielding, REST discuss mailing list
+
A common pattern for Web APIs is to use filename extensions on URLs to provide an endpoint for a given media type. For example, 'http://example.com/api/users.json' to serve a JSON representation.
+Adding format-suffix patterns to each individual entry in the URLconf for your API is error-prone and non-DRY, so REST framework provides a shortcut to adding these patterns to your URLConf.
+Signature: format_suffix_patterns(urlpatterns, suffix_required=False, allowed=None)
+Returns a URL pattern list which includes format suffix patterns appended to each of the URL patterns provided.
+Arguments:
+False
, meaning that suffixes are optional by default.Example:
+from rest_framework.urlpatterns import format_suffix_patterns
+from blog import views
+
+urlpatterns = [
+ url(r'^/$', views.apt_root),
+ url(r'^comments/$', views.comment_list),
+ url(r'^comments/(?P<pk>[0-9]+)/$', views.comment_detail)
+]
+
+urlpatterns = format_suffix_patterns(urlpatterns, allowed=['json', 'html'])
+
+When using format_suffix_patterns
, you must make sure to add the 'format'
keyword argument to the corresponding views. For example:
@api_view(['GET', 'POST'])
+def comment_list(request, format=None):
+ # do stuff...
+
+Or with class-based views:
+class CommentList(APIView):
+ def get(self, request, format=None):
+ # do stuff...
+
+ def post(self, request, format=None):
+ # do stuff...
+
+The name of the kwarg used may be modified by using the FORMAT_SUFFIX_KWARG
setting.
Also note that format_suffix_patterns
does not support descending into include
URL patterns.
i18n_patterns
If using the i18n_patterns
function provided by Django, as well as format_suffix_patterns
you should make sure that the i18n_patterns
function is applied as the final, or outermost function. For example:
url patterns = [
+ …
+]
+
+urlpatterns = i18n_patterns(
+ format_suffix_patterns(urlpatterns, allowed=['json', 'html'])
+)
+
+An alternative to the format suffixes is to include the requested format in a query parameter. REST framework provides this option by default, and it is used in the browsable API to switch between differing available representations.
+To select a representation using its short format, use the format
query parameter. For example: http://example.com/organizations/?format=csv
.
The name of this query parameter can be modified using the URL_FORMAT_OVERRIDE
setting. Set the value to None
to disable this behavior.
There seems to be a view among some of the Web community that filename extensions are not a RESTful pattern, and that HTTP Accept
headers should always be used instead.
It is actually a misconception. For example, take the following quote from Roy Fielding discussing the relative merits of query parameter media-type indicators vs. file extension media-type indicators:
+“That's why I always prefer extensions. Neither choice has anything to do with REST.” — Roy Fielding, REST discuss mailing list
+The quote does not mention Accept headers, but it does make it clear that format suffixes should be considered an acceptable pattern.
+ + +++Django’s generic views... were developed as a shortcut for common usage patterns... They take certain common idioms and patterns found in view development and abstract them so that you can quickly write common views of data without having to repeat yourself.
+ +
One of the key benefits of class-based views is the way they allow you to compose bits of reusable behavior. REST framework takes advantage of this by providing a number of pre-built views that provide for commonly used patterns.
+The generic views provided by REST framework allow you to quickly build API views that map closely to your database models.
+If the generic views don't suit the needs of your API, you can drop down to using the regular APIView
class, or reuse the mixins and base classes used by the generic views to compose your own set of reusable generic views.
Typically when using the generic views, you'll override the view, and set several class attributes.
+from django.contrib.auth.models import User
+from myapp.serializers import UserSerializer
+from rest_framework import generics
+from rest_framework.permissions import IsAdminUser
+
+class UserList(generics.ListCreateAPIView):
+ queryset = User.objects.all()
+ serializer_class = UserSerializer
+ permission_classes = [IsAdminUser]
+
+For more complex cases you might also want to override various methods on the view class. For example.
+class UserList(generics.ListCreateAPIView):
+ queryset = User.objects.all()
+ serializer_class = UserSerializer
+ permission_classes = [IsAdminUser]
+
+ def list(self, request):
+ # Note the use of `get_queryset()` instead of `self.queryset`
+ queryset = self.get_queryset()
+ serializer = UserSerializer(queryset, many=True)
+ return Response(serializer.data)
+
+For very simple cases you might want to pass through any class attributes using the .as_view()
method. For example, your URLconf might include something like the following entry:
url(r'^/users/', ListCreateAPIView.as_view(queryset=User.objects.all(), serializer_class=UserSerializer), name='user-list')
+
+This class extends REST framework's APIView
class, adding commonly required behavior for standard list and detail views.
Each of the concrete generic views provided is built by combining GenericAPIView
, with one or more mixin classes.
Basic settings:
+The following attributes control the basic view behavior.
+queryset
- The queryset that should be used for returning objects from this view. Typically, you must either set this attribute, or override the get_queryset()
method. If you are overriding a view method, it is important that you call get_queryset()
instead of accessing this property directly, as queryset
will get evaluated once, and those results will be cached for all subsequent requests.serializer_class
- The serializer class that should be used for validating and deserializing input, and for serializing output. Typically, you must either set this attribute, or override the get_serializer_class()
method.lookup_field
- The model field that should be used to for performing object lookup of individual model instances. Defaults to 'pk'
. Note that when using hyperlinked APIs you'll need to ensure that both the API views and the serializer classes set the lookup fields if you need to use a custom value.lookup_url_kwarg
- The URL keyword argument that should be used for object lookup. The URL conf should include a keyword argument corresponding to this value. If unset this defaults to using the same value as lookup_field
.Pagination:
+The following attributes are used to control pagination when used with list views.
+pagination_class
- The pagination class that should be used when paginating list results. Defaults to the same value as the DEFAULT_PAGINATION_CLASS
setting, which is 'rest_framework.pagination.PageNumberPagination'
. Setting pagination_class=None
will disable pagination on this view.Filtering:
+filter_backends
- A list of filter backend classes that should be used for filtering the queryset. Defaults to the same value as the DEFAULT_FILTER_BACKENDS
setting.Base methods:
+get_queryset(self)
Returns the queryset that should be used for list views, and that should be used as the base for lookups in detail views. Defaults to returning the queryset specified by the queryset
attribute.
This method should always be used rather than accessing self.queryset
directly, as self.queryset
gets evaluated only once, and those results are cached for all subsequent requests.
May be overridden to provide dynamic behavior, such as returning a queryset, that is specific to the user making the request.
+For example:
+def get_queryset(self):
+ user = self.request.user
+ return user.accounts.all()
+
+get_object(self)
Returns an object instance that should be used for detail views. Defaults to using the lookup_field
parameter to filter the base queryset.
May be overridden to provide more complex behavior, such as object lookups based on more than one URL kwarg.
+For example:
+def get_object(self):
+ queryset = self.get_queryset()
+ filter = {}
+ for field in self.multiple_lookup_fields:
+ filter[field] = self.kwargs[field]
+
+ obj = get_object_or_404(queryset, **filter)
+ self.check_object_permissions(self.request, obj)
+ return obj
+
+Note that if your API doesn't include any object level permissions, you may optionally exclude the self.check_object_permissions
, and simply return the object from the get_object_or_404
lookup.
filter_queryset(self, queryset)
Given a queryset, filter it with whichever filter backends are in use, returning a new queryset.
+For example:
+def filter_queryset(self, queryset):
+ filter_backends = [CategoryFilter]
+
+ if 'geo_route' in self.request.query_params:
+ filter_backends = [GeoRouteFilter, CategoryFilter]
+ elif 'geo_point' in self.request.query_params:
+ filter_backends = [GeoPointFilter, CategoryFilter]
+
+ for backend in list(filter_backends):
+ queryset = backend().filter_queryset(self.request, queryset, view=self)
+
+ return queryset
+
+get_serializer_class(self)
Returns the class that should be used for the serializer. Defaults to returning the serializer_class
attribute.
May be overridden to provide dynamic behavior, such as using different serializers for read and write operations, or providing different serializers to different types of users.
+For example:
+def get_serializer_class(self):
+ if self.request.user.is_staff:
+ return FullAccountSerializer
+ return BasicAccountSerializer
+
+Save and deletion hooks:
+The following methods are provided by the mixin classes, and provide easy overriding of the object save or deletion behavior.
+perform_create(self, serializer)
- Called by CreateModelMixin
when saving a new object instance.perform_update(self, serializer)
- Called by UpdateModelMixin
when saving an existing object instance.perform_destroy(self, instance)
- Called by DestroyModelMixin
when deleting an object instance.These hooks are particularly useful for setting attributes that are implicit in the request, but are not part of the request data. For instance, you might set an attribute on the object based on the request user, or based on a URL keyword argument.
+def perform_create(self, serializer):
+ serializer.save(user=self.request.user)
+
+These override points are also particularly useful for adding behavior that occurs before or after saving an object, such as emailing a confirmation, or logging the update.
+def perform_update(self, serializer):
+ instance = serializer.save()
+ send_email_confirmation(user=self.request.user, modified=instance)
+
+You can also use these hooks to provide additional validation, by raising a ValidationError()
. This can be useful if you need some validation logic to apply at the point of database save. For example:
def perform_create(self, serializer):
+ queryset = SignupRequest.objects.filter(user=self.request.user)
+ if queryset.exists():
+ raise ValidationError('You have already signed up')
+ serializer.save(user=self.request.user)
+
+Note: These methods replace the old-style version 2.x pre_save
, post_save
, pre_delete
and post_delete
methods, which are no longer available.
Other methods:
+You won't typically need to override the following methods, although you might need to call into them if you're writing custom views using GenericAPIView
.
get_serializer_context(self)
- Returns a dictionary containing any extra context that should be supplied to the serializer. Defaults to including 'request'
, 'view'
and 'format'
keys.get_serializer(self, instance=None, data=None, many=False, partial=False)
- Returns a serializer instance.get_paginated_response(self, data)
- Returns a paginated style Response
object.paginate_queryset(self, queryset)
- Paginate a queryset if required, either returning a page object, or None
if pagination is not configured for this view.filter_queryset(self, queryset)
- Given a queryset, filter it with whichever filter backends are in use, returning a new queryset.The mixin classes provide the actions that are used to provide the basic view behavior. Note that the mixin classes provide action methods rather than defining the handler methods, such as .get()
and .post()
, directly. This allows for more flexible composition of behavior.
The mixin classes can be imported from rest_framework.mixins
.
Provides a .list(request, *args, **kwargs)
method, that implements listing a queryset.
If the queryset is populated, this returns a 200 OK
response, with a serialized representation of the queryset as the body of the response. The response data may optionally be paginated.
Provides a .create(request, *args, **kwargs)
method, that implements creating and saving a new model instance.
If an object is created this returns a 201 Created
response, with a serialized representation of the object as the body of the response. If the representation contains a key named url
, then the Location
header of the response will be populated with that value.
If the request data provided for creating the object was invalid, a 400 Bad Request
response will be returned, with the error details as the body of the response.
Provides a .retrieve(request, *args, **kwargs)
method, that implements returning an existing model instance in a response.
If an object can be retrieved this returns a 200 OK
response, with a serialized representation of the object as the body of the response. Otherwise it will return a 404 Not Found
.
Provides a .update(request, *args, **kwargs)
method, that implements updating and saving an existing model instance.
Also provides a .partial_update(request, *args, **kwargs)
method, which is similar to the update
method, except that all fields for the update will be optional. This allows support for HTTP PATCH
requests.
If an object is updated this returns a 200 OK
response, with a serialized representation of the object as the body of the response.
If the request data provided for updating the object was invalid, a 400 Bad Request
response will be returned, with the error details as the body of the response.
Provides a .destroy(request, *args, **kwargs)
method, that implements deletion of an existing model instance.
If an object is deleted this returns a 204 No Content
response, otherwise it will return a 404 Not Found
.
The following classes are the concrete generic views. If you're using generic views this is normally the level you'll be working at unless you need heavily customized behavior.
+The view classes can be imported from rest_framework.generics
.
Used for create-only endpoints.
+Provides a post
method handler.
Extends: GenericAPIView, CreateModelMixin
+Used for read-only endpoints to represent a collection of model instances.
+Provides a get
method handler.
Extends: GenericAPIView, ListModelMixin
+Used for read-only endpoints to represent a single model instance.
+Provides a get
method handler.
Extends: GenericAPIView, RetrieveModelMixin
+Used for delete-only endpoints for a single model instance.
+Provides a delete
method handler.
Extends: GenericAPIView, DestroyModelMixin
+Used for update-only endpoints for a single model instance.
+Provides put
and patch
method handlers.
Extends: GenericAPIView, UpdateModelMixin
+Used for read-write endpoints to represent a collection of model instances.
+Provides get
and post
method handlers.
Extends: GenericAPIView, ListModelMixin, CreateModelMixin
+Used for read or update endpoints to represent a single model instance.
+Provides get
, put
and patch
method handlers.
Extends: GenericAPIView, RetrieveModelMixin, UpdateModelMixin
+Used for read or delete endpoints to represent a single model instance.
+Provides get
and delete
method handlers.
Extends: GenericAPIView, RetrieveModelMixin, DestroyModelMixin
+Used for read-write-delete endpoints to represent a single model instance.
+Provides get
, put
, patch
and delete
method handlers.
Extends: GenericAPIView, RetrieveModelMixin, UpdateModelMixin, DestroyModelMixin
+Often you'll want to use the existing generic views, but use some slightly customized behavior. If you find yourself reusing some bit of customized behavior in multiple places, you might want to refactor the behavior into a common class that you can then just apply to any view or viewset as needed.
+For example, if you need to lookup objects based on multiple fields in the URL conf, you could create a mixin class like the following:
+class MultipleFieldLookupMixin(object):
+ """
+ Apply this mixin to any view or viewset to get multiple field filtering
+ based on a `lookup_fields` attribute, instead of the default single field filtering.
+ """
+ def get_object(self):
+ queryset = self.get_queryset() # Get the base queryset
+ queryset = self.filter_queryset(queryset) # Apply any filter backends
+ filter = {}
+ for field in self.lookup_fields:
+ if self.kwargs[field]: # Ignore empty fields.
+ filter[field] = self.kwargs[field]
+ obj = get_object_or_404(queryset, **filter) # Lookup the object
+ self.check_object_permissions(self.request, obj)
+ return obj
+
+You can then simply apply this mixin to a view or viewset anytime you need to apply the custom behavior.
+class RetrieveUserView(MultipleFieldLookupMixin, generics.RetrieveAPIView):
+ queryset = User.objects.all()
+ serializer_class = UserSerializer
+ lookup_fields = ['account', 'username']
+
+Using custom mixins is a good option if you have custom behavior that needs to be used.
+If you are using a mixin across multiple views, you can take this a step further and create your own set of base views that can then be used throughout your project. For example:
+class BaseRetrieveView(MultipleFieldLookupMixin,
+ generics.RetrieveAPIView):
+ pass
+
+class BaseRetrieveUpdateDestroyView(MultipleFieldLookupMixin,
+ generics.RetrieveUpdateDestroyAPIView):
+ pass
+
+Using custom base classes is a good option if you have custom behavior that consistently needs to be repeated across a large number of views throughout your project.
+Prior to version 3.0 the REST framework mixins treated PUT
as either an update or a create operation, depending on if the object already existed or not.
Allowing PUT
as create operations is problematic, as it necessarily exposes information about the existence or non-existence of objects. It's also not obvious that transparently allowing re-creating of previously deleted instances is necessarily a better default behavior than simply returning 404
responses.
Both styles "PUT
as 404" and "PUT
as create" can be valid in different circumstances, but from version 3.0 onwards we now use 404 behavior as the default, due to it being simpler and more obvious.
If you need to generic PUT-as-create behavior you may want to include something like this AllowPUTAsCreateMixin
class as a mixin to your views.
The following third party packages provide additional generic view implementations.
+Django Rest Multiple Models provides a generic view (and mixin) for sending multiple serialized models and/or querysets via a single API request.
+ + +++[The
+ +OPTIONS
] method allows a client to determine the options and/or requirements associated with a resource, or the capabilities of a server, without implying a resource action or initiating a resource retrieval.
REST framework includes a configurable mechanism for determining how your API should respond to OPTIONS
requests. This allows you to return API schema or other resource information.
There are not currently any widely adopted conventions for exactly what style of response should be returned for HTTP OPTIONS
requests, so we provide an ad-hoc style that returns some useful information.
Here's an example response that demonstrates the information that is returned by default.
+HTTP 200 OK
+Allow: GET, POST, HEAD, OPTIONS
+Content-Type: application/json
+
+{
+ "name": "To Do List",
+ "description": "List existing 'To Do' items, or create a new item.",
+ "renders": [
+ "application/json",
+ "text/html"
+ ],
+ "parses": [
+ "application/json",
+ "application/x-www-form-urlencoded",
+ "multipart/form-data"
+ ],
+ "actions": {
+ "POST": {
+ "note": {
+ "type": "string",
+ "required": false,
+ "read_only": false,
+ "label": "title",
+ "max_length": 100
+ }
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+You can set the metadata class globally using the 'DEFAULT_METADATA_CLASS'
settings key:
REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ 'DEFAULT_METADATA_CLASS': 'rest_framework.metadata.SimpleMetadata'
+}
+
+Or you can set the metadata class individually for a view:
+class APIRoot(APIView):
+ metadata_class = APIRootMetadata
+
+ def get(self, request, format=None):
+ return Response({
+ ...
+ })
+
+The REST framework package only includes a single metadata class implementation, named SimpleMetadata
. If you want to use an alternative style you'll need to implement a custom metadata class.
If you have specific requirements for creating schema endpoints that are accessed with regular GET
requests, you might consider re-using the metadata API for doing so.
For example, the following additional route could be used on a viewset to provide a linkable schema endpoint.
+@action(methods=['GET'], detail=False)
+def schema(self, request):
+ meta = self.metadata_class()
+ data = meta.determine_metadata(request, self)
+ return Response(data)
+
+There are a couple of reasons that you might choose to take this approach, including that OPTIONS
responses are not cacheable.
If you want to provide a custom metadata class you should override BaseMetadata
and implement the determine_metadata(self, request, view)
method.
Useful things that you might want to do could include returning schema information, using a format such as JSON schema, or returning debug information to admin users.
+The following class could be used to limit the information that is returned to OPTIONS
requests.
class MinimalMetadata(BaseMetadata):
+ """
+ Don't include field and other information for `OPTIONS` requests.
+ Just return the name and description.
+ """
+ def determine_metadata(self, request, view):
+ return {
+ 'name': view.get_view_name(),
+ 'description': view.get_view_description()
+ }
+
+Then configure your settings to use this custom class:
+REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ 'DEFAULT_METADATA_CLASS': 'myproject.apps.core.MinimalMetadata'
+}
+
+The following third party packages provide additional metadata implementations.
+drf-schema-adapter is a set of tools that makes it easier to provide schema information to frontend frameworks and libraries. It provides a metadata mixin as well as 2 metadata classes and several adapters suitable to generate json-schema as well as schema information readable by various libraries.
+You can also write your own adapter to work with your specific frontend. +If you wish to do so, it also provides an exporter that can export those schema information to json files.
+ + +++Django provides a few classes that help you manage paginated data – that is, data that’s split across several pages, with “Previous/Next” links.
+ +
REST framework includes support for customizable pagination styles. This allows you to modify how large result sets are split into individual pages of data.
+The pagination API can support either:
+Content-Range
or Link
.The built-in styles currently all use links included as part of the content of the response. This style is more accessible when using the browsable API.
+Pagination is only performed automatically if you're using the generic views or viewsets. If you're using a regular APIView
, you'll need to call into the pagination API yourself to ensure you return a paginated response. See the source code for the mixins.ListModelMixin
and generics.GenericAPIView
classes for an example.
Pagination can be turned off by setting the pagination class to None
.
The pagination style may be set globally, using the DEFAULT_PAGINATION_CLASS
and PAGE_SIZE
setting keys. For example, to use the built-in limit/offset pagination, you would do something like this:
REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ 'DEFAULT_PAGINATION_CLASS': 'rest_framework.pagination.LimitOffsetPagination',
+ 'PAGE_SIZE': 100
+}
+
+Note that you need to set both the pagination class, and the page size that should be used. Both DEFAULT_PAGINATION_CLASS
and PAGE_SIZE
are None
by default.
You can also set the pagination class on an individual view by using the pagination_class
attribute. Typically you'll want to use the same pagination style throughout your API, although you might want to vary individual aspects of the pagination, such as default or maximum page size, on a per-view basis.
If you want to modify particular aspects of the pagination style, you'll want to override one of the pagination classes, and set the attributes that you want to change.
+class LargeResultsSetPagination(PageNumberPagination):
+ page_size = 1000
+ page_size_query_param = 'page_size'
+ max_page_size = 10000
+
+class StandardResultsSetPagination(PageNumberPagination):
+ page_size = 100
+ page_size_query_param = 'page_size'
+ max_page_size = 1000
+
+You can then apply your new style to a view using the pagination_class
attribute:
class BillingRecordsView(generics.ListAPIView):
+ queryset = Billing.objects.all()
+ serializer_class = BillingRecordsSerializer
+ pagination_class = LargeResultsSetPagination
+
+Or apply the style globally, using the DEFAULT_PAGINATION_CLASS
settings key. For example:
REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ 'DEFAULT_PAGINATION_CLASS': 'apps.core.pagination.StandardResultsSetPagination'
+}
+
+This pagination style accepts a single number page number in the request query parameters.
+Request:
+GET https://api.example.org/accounts/?page=4
+
+Response:
+HTTP 200 OK
+{
+ "count": 1023
+ "next": "https://api.example.org/accounts/?page=5",
+ "previous": "https://api.example.org/accounts/?page=3",
+ "results": [
+ …
+ ]
+}
+
+To enable the PageNumberPagination
style globally, use the following configuration, and set the PAGE_SIZE
as desired:
REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ 'DEFAULT_PAGINATION_CLASS': 'rest_framework.pagination.PageNumberPagination',
+ 'PAGE_SIZE': 100
+}
+
+On GenericAPIView
subclasses you may also set the pagination_class
attribute to select PageNumberPagination
on a per-view basis.
The PageNumberPagination
class includes a number of attributes that may be overridden to modify the pagination style.
To set these attributes you should override the PageNumberPagination
class, and then enable your custom pagination class as above.
django_paginator_class
- The Django Paginator class to use. Default is django.core.paginator.Paginator
, which should be fine for most use cases.page_size
- A numeric value indicating the page size. If set, this overrides the PAGE_SIZE
setting. Defaults to the same value as the PAGE_SIZE
settings key.page_query_param
- A string value indicating the name of the query parameter to use for the pagination control.page_size_query_param
- If set, this is a string value indicating the name of a query parameter that allows the client to set the page size on a per-request basis. Defaults to None
, indicating that the client may not control the requested page size.max_page_size
- If set, this is a numeric value indicating the maximum allowable requested page size. This attribute is only valid if page_size_query_param
is also set.last_page_strings
- A list or tuple of string values indicating values that may be used with the page_query_param
to request the final page in the set. Defaults to ('last',)
template
- The name of a template to use when rendering pagination controls in the browsable API. May be overridden to modify the rendering style, or set to None
to disable HTML pagination controls completely. Defaults to "rest_framework/pagination/numbers.html"
.This pagination style mirrors the syntax used when looking up multiple database records. The client includes both a "limit" and an
+"offset" query parameter. The limit indicates the maximum number of items to return, and is equivalent to the page_size
in other styles. The offset indicates the starting position of the query in relation to the complete set of unpaginated items.
Request:
+GET https://api.example.org/accounts/?limit=100&offset=400
+
+Response:
+HTTP 200 OK
+{
+ "count": 1023
+ "next": "https://api.example.org/accounts/?limit=100&offset=500",
+ "previous": "https://api.example.org/accounts/?limit=100&offset=300",
+ "results": [
+ …
+ ]
+}
+
+To enable the LimitOffsetPagination
style globally, use the following configuration:
REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ 'DEFAULT_PAGINATION_CLASS': 'rest_framework.pagination.LimitOffsetPagination'
+}
+
+Optionally, you may also set a PAGE_SIZE
key. If the PAGE_SIZE
parameter is also used then the limit
query parameter will be optional, and may be omitted by the client.
On GenericAPIView
subclasses you may also set the pagination_class
attribute to select LimitOffsetPagination
on a per-view basis.
The LimitOffsetPagination
class includes a number of attributes that may be overridden to modify the pagination style.
To set these attributes you should override the LimitOffsetPagination
class, and then enable your custom pagination class as above.
default_limit
- A numeric value indicating the limit to use if one is not provided by the client in a query parameter. Defaults to the same value as the PAGE_SIZE
settings key.limit_query_param
- A string value indicating the name of the "limit" query parameter. Defaults to 'limit'
.offset_query_param
- A string value indicating the name of the "offset" query parameter. Defaults to 'offset'
.max_limit
- If set this is a numeric value indicating the maximum allowable limit that may be requested by the client. Defaults to None
.template
- The name of a template to use when rendering pagination controls in the browsable API. May be overridden to modify the rendering style, or set to None
to disable HTML pagination controls completely. Defaults to "rest_framework/pagination/numbers.html"
.The cursor-based pagination presents an opaque "cursor" indicator that the client may use to page through the result set. This pagination style only presents forward and reverse controls, and does not allow the client to navigate to arbitrary positions.
+Cursor based pagination requires that there is a unique, unchanging ordering of items in the result set. This ordering might typically be a creation timestamp on the records, as this presents a consistent ordering to paginate against.
+Cursor based pagination is more complex than other schemes. It also requires that the result set presents a fixed ordering, and does not allow the client to arbitrarily index into the result set. However it does provide the following benefits:
+CursorPagination
ensures that the client will never see the same item twice when paging through records, even when new items are being inserted by other clients during the pagination process.Proper use of cursor based pagination requires a little attention to detail. You'll need to think about what ordering you want the scheme to be applied against. The default is to order by "-created"
. This assumes that there must be a 'created' timestamp field on the model instances, and will present a "timeline" style paginated view, with the most recently added items first.
You can modify the ordering by overriding the 'ordering'
attribute on the pagination class, or by using the OrderingFilter
filter class together with CursorPagination
. When used with OrderingFilter
you should strongly consider restricting the fields that the user may order by.
Proper usage of cursor pagination should have an ordering field that satisfies the following:
+CursorPagination
subclass that uses decimals to limit precision is available here.)Using an ordering field that does not satisfy these constraints will generally still work, but you'll be losing some of the benefits of cursor pagination.
+For more technical details on the implementation we use for cursor pagination, the "Building cursors for the Disqus API" blog post gives a good overview of the basic approach.
+To enable the CursorPagination
style globally, use the following configuration, modifying the PAGE_SIZE
as desired:
REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ 'DEFAULT_PAGINATION_CLASS': 'rest_framework.pagination.CursorPagination',
+ 'PAGE_SIZE': 100
+}
+
+On GenericAPIView
subclasses you may also set the pagination_class
attribute to select CursorPagination
on a per-view basis.
The CursorPagination
class includes a number of attributes that may be overridden to modify the pagination style.
To set these attributes you should override the CursorPagination
class, and then enable your custom pagination class as above.
page_size
= A numeric value indicating the page size. If set, this overrides the PAGE_SIZE
setting. Defaults to the same value as the PAGE_SIZE
settings key.cursor_query_param
= A string value indicating the name of the "cursor" query parameter. Defaults to 'cursor'
.ordering
= This should be a string, or list of strings, indicating the field against which the cursor based pagination will be applied. For example: ordering = 'slug'
. Defaults to -created
. This value may also be overridden by using OrderingFilter
on the view.template
= The name of a template to use when rendering pagination controls in the browsable API. May be overridden to modify the rendering style, or set to None
to disable HTML pagination controls completely. Defaults to "rest_framework/pagination/previous_and_next.html"
.To create a custom pagination serializer class you should subclass pagination.BasePagination
and override the paginate_queryset(self, queryset, request, view=None)
and get_paginated_response(self, data)
methods:
paginate_queryset
method is passed the initial queryset and should return an iterable object that contains only the data in the requested page.get_paginated_response
method is passed the serialized page data and should return a Response
instance.Note that the paginate_queryset
method may set state on the pagination instance, that may later be used by the get_paginated_response
method.
Suppose we want to replace the default pagination output style with a modified format that includes the next and previous links under in a nested 'links' key. We could specify a custom pagination class like so:
+class CustomPagination(pagination.PageNumberPagination):
+ def get_paginated_response(self, data):
+ return Response({
+ 'links': {
+ 'next': self.get_next_link(),
+ 'previous': self.get_previous_link()
+ },
+ 'count': self.page.paginator.count,
+ 'results': data
+ })
+
+We'd then need to setup the custom class in our configuration:
+REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ 'DEFAULT_PAGINATION_CLASS': 'my_project.apps.core.pagination.CustomPagination',
+ 'PAGE_SIZE': 100
+}
+
+Note that if you care about how the ordering of keys is displayed in responses in the browsable API you might choose to use an OrderedDict
when constructing the body of paginated responses, but this is optional.
To have your custom pagination class be used by default, use the DEFAULT_PAGINATION_CLASS
setting:
REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ 'DEFAULT_PAGINATION_CLASS': 'my_project.apps.core.pagination.LinkHeaderPagination',
+ 'PAGE_SIZE': 100
+}
+
+API responses for list endpoints will now include a Link
header, instead of including the pagination links as part of the body of the response, for example:
A custom pagination style, using the 'Link' header'
+You can also make the pagination controls available to the schema autogeneration
+that REST framework provides, by implementing a get_schema_fields()
method. This method should have the following signature:
get_schema_fields(self, view)
The method should return a list of coreapi.Field
instances.
By default using the pagination classes will cause HTML pagination controls to be displayed in the browsable API. There are two built-in display styles. The PageNumberPagination
and LimitOffsetPagination
classes display a list of page numbers with previous and next controls. The CursorPagination
class displays a simpler style that only displays a previous and next control.
You can override the templates that render the HTML pagination controls. The two built-in styles are:
+rest_framework/pagination/numbers.html
rest_framework/pagination/previous_and_next.html
Providing a template with either of these paths in a global template directory will override the default rendering for the relevant pagination classes.
+Alternatively you can disable HTML pagination controls completely by subclassing on of the existing classes, setting template = None
as an attribute on the class. You'll then need to configure your DEFAULT_PAGINATION_CLASS
settings key to use your custom class as the default pagination style.
The low-level API for determining if a pagination class should display the controls or not is exposed as a display_page_controls
attribute on the pagination instance. Custom pagination classes should be set to True
in the paginate_queryset
method if they require the HTML pagination controls to be displayed.
The .to_html()
and .get_html_context()
methods may also be overridden in a custom pagination class in order to further customize how the controls are rendered.
The following third party packages are also available.
+The DRF-extensions
package includes a PaginateByMaxMixin
mixin class that allows your API clients to specify ?page_size=max
to obtain the maximum allowed page size.
The drf-proxy-pagination
package includes a ProxyPagination
class which allows to choose pagination class with a query parameter.
The django-rest-framework-link-header-pagination
package includes a LinkHeaderPagination
class which provides pagination via an HTTP Link
header as described in Github's developer documentation.
++Machine interacting web services tend to use more +structured formats for sending data than form-encoded, since they're +sending more complex data than simple forms
+— Malcom Tredinnick, Django developers group
+
REST framework includes a number of built in Parser classes, that allow you to accept requests with various media types. There is also support for defining your own custom parsers, which gives you the flexibility to design the media types that your API accepts.
+The set of valid parsers for a view is always defined as a list of classes. When request.data
is accessed, REST framework will examine the Content-Type
header on the incoming request, and determine which parser to use to parse the request content.
Note: When developing client applications always remember to make sure you're setting the Content-Type
header when sending data in an HTTP request.
If you don't set the content type, most clients will default to using 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded'
, which may not be what you wanted.
As an example, if you are sending json
encoded data using jQuery with the .ajax() method, you should make sure to include the contentType: 'application/json'
setting.
The default set of parsers may be set globally, using the DEFAULT_PARSER_CLASSES
setting. For example, the following settings would allow only requests with JSON
content, instead of the default of JSON or form data.
REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ 'DEFAULT_PARSER_CLASSES': [
+ 'rest_framework.parsers.JSONParser',
+ ]
+}
+
+You can also set the parsers used for an individual view, or viewset,
+using the APIView
class-based views.
from rest_framework.parsers import JSONParser
+from rest_framework.response import Response
+from rest_framework.views import APIView
+
+class ExampleView(APIView):
+ """
+ A view that can accept POST requests with JSON content.
+ """
+ parser_classes = [JSONParser]
+
+ def post(self, request, format=None):
+ return Response({'received data': request.data})
+
+Or, if you're using the @api_view
decorator with function based views.
from rest_framework.decorators import api_view
+from rest_framework.decorators import parser_classes
+from rest_framework.parsers import JSONParser
+
+@api_view(['POST'])
+@parser_classes([JSONParser])
+def example_view(request, format=None):
+ """
+ A view that can accept POST requests with JSON content.
+ """
+ return Response({'received data': request.data})
+
+Parses JSON
request content.
.media_type: application/json
Parses HTML form content. request.data
will be populated with a QueryDict
of data.
You will typically want to use both FormParser
and MultiPartParser
together in order to fully support HTML form data.
.media_type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Parses multipart HTML form content, which supports file uploads. Both request.data
will be populated with a QueryDict
.
You will typically want to use both FormParser
and MultiPartParser
together in order to fully support HTML form data.
.media_type: multipart/form-data
Parses raw file upload content. The request.data
property will be a dictionary with a single key 'file'
containing the uploaded file.
If the view used with FileUploadParser
is called with a filename
URL keyword argument, then that argument will be used as the filename.
If it is called without a filename
URL keyword argument, then the client must set the filename in the Content-Disposition
HTTP header. For example Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=upload.jpg
.
.media_type: */*
FileUploadParser
is for usage with native clients that can upload the file as a raw data request. For web-based uploads, or for native clients with multipart upload support, you should use the MultiPartParser
instead.media_type
matches any content type, FileUploadParser
should generally be the only parser set on an API view.FileUploadParser
respects Django's standard FILE_UPLOAD_HANDLERS
setting, and the request.upload_handlers
attribute. See the Django documentation for more details.# views.py
+class FileUploadView(views.APIView):
+ parser_classes = [FileUploadParser]
+
+ def put(self, request, filename, format=None):
+ file_obj = request.data['file']
+ # ...
+ # do some stuff with uploaded file
+ # ...
+ return Response(status=204)
+
+# urls.py
+urlpatterns = [
+ # ...
+ url(r'^upload/(?P<filename>[^/]+)$', FileUploadView.as_view())
+]
+
+To implement a custom parser, you should override BaseParser
, set the .media_type
property, and implement the .parse(self, stream, media_type, parser_context)
method.
The method should return the data that will be used to populate the request.data
property.
The arguments passed to .parse()
are:
A stream-like object representing the body of the request.
+Optional. If provided, this is the media type of the incoming request content.
+Depending on the request's Content-Type:
header, this may be more specific than the renderer's media_type
attribute, and may include media type parameters. For example "text/plain; charset=utf-8"
.
Optional. If supplied, this argument will be a dictionary containing any additional context that may be required to parse the request content.
+By default this will include the following keys: view
, request
, args
, kwargs
.
The following is an example plaintext parser that will populate the request.data
property with a string representing the body of the request.
class PlainTextParser(BaseParser):
+ """
+ Plain text parser.
+ """
+ media_type = 'text/plain'
+
+ def parse(self, stream, media_type=None, parser_context=None):
+ """
+ Simply return a string representing the body of the request.
+ """
+ return stream.read()
+
+The following third party packages are also available.
+REST framework YAML provides YAML parsing and rendering support. It was previously included directly in the REST framework package, and is now instead supported as a third-party package.
+Install using pip.
+$ pip install djangorestframework-yaml
+
+Modify your REST framework settings.
+REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ 'DEFAULT_PARSER_CLASSES': [
+ 'rest_framework_yaml.parsers.YAMLParser',
+ ],
+ 'DEFAULT_RENDERER_CLASSES': [
+ 'rest_framework_yaml.renderers.YAMLRenderer',
+ ],
+}
+
+REST Framework XML provides a simple informal XML format. It was previously included directly in the REST framework package, and is now instead supported as a third-party package.
+Install using pip.
+$ pip install djangorestframework-xml
+
+Modify your REST framework settings.
+REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ 'DEFAULT_PARSER_CLASSES': [
+ 'rest_framework_xml.parsers.XMLParser',
+ ],
+ 'DEFAULT_RENDERER_CLASSES': [
+ 'rest_framework_xml.renderers.XMLRenderer',
+ ],
+}
+
+MessagePack is a fast, efficient binary serialization format. Juan Riaza maintains the djangorestframework-msgpack package which provides MessagePack renderer and parser support for REST framework.
+djangorestframework-camel-case provides camel case JSON renderers and parsers for REST framework. This allows serializers to use Python-style underscored field names, but be exposed in the API as Javascript-style camel case field names. It is maintained by Vitaly Babiy.
+ + +++Authentication or identification by itself is not usually sufficient to gain access to information or code. For that, the entity requesting access must have authorization.
+ +
Together with authentication and throttling, permissions determine whether a request should be granted or denied access.
+Permission checks are always run at the very start of the view, before any other code is allowed to proceed. Permission checks will typically use the authentication information in the request.user
and request.auth
properties to determine if the incoming request should be permitted.
Permissions are used to grant or deny access for different classes of users to different parts of the API.
+The simplest style of permission would be to allow access to any authenticated user, and deny access to any unauthenticated user. This corresponds to the IsAuthenticated
class in REST framework.
A slightly less strict style of permission would be to allow full access to authenticated users, but allow read-only access to unauthenticated users. This corresponds to the IsAuthenticatedOrReadOnly
class in REST framework.
Permissions in REST framework are always defined as a list of permission classes.
+Before running the main body of the view each permission in the list is checked.
+If any permission check fails an exceptions.PermissionDenied
or exceptions.NotAuthenticated
exception will be raised, and the main body of the view will not run.
When the permissions checks fail either a "403 Forbidden" or a "401 Unauthorized" response will be returned, according to the following rules:
+WWW-Authenticate
headers. — An HTTP 403 Forbidden response will be returned.WWW-Authenticate
headers. — An HTTP 401 Unauthorized response, with an appropriate WWW-Authenticate
header will be returned.REST framework permissions also support object-level permissioning. Object level permissions are used to determine if a user should be allowed to act on a particular object, which will typically be a model instance.
+Object level permissions are run by REST framework's generic views when .get_object()
is called.
+As with view level permissions, an exceptions.PermissionDenied
exception will be raised if the user is not allowed to act on the given object.
If you're writing your own views and want to enforce object level permissions,
+or if you override the get_object
method on a generic view, then you'll need to explicitly call the .check_object_permissions(request, obj)
method on the view at the point at which you've retrieved the object.
This will either raise a PermissionDenied
or NotAuthenticated
exception, or simply return if the view has the appropriate permissions.
For example:
+def get_object(self):
+ obj = get_object_or_404(self.get_queryset(), pk=self.kwargs["pk"])
+ self.check_object_permissions(self.request, obj)
+ return obj
+
+Note: With the exception of DjangoObjectPermissions
, the provided
+permission classes in rest_framework.permissions
do not implement the
+methods necessary to check object permissions.
If you wish to use the provided permission classes in order to check object
+permissions, you must subclass them and implement the
+has_object_permission()
method described in the Custom
+permissions section (below).
For performance reasons the generic views will not automatically apply object level permissions to each instance in a queryset when returning a list of objects.
+Often when you're using object level permissions you'll also want to filter the queryset appropriately, to ensure that users only have visibility onto instances that they are permitted to view.
+The default permission policy may be set globally, using the DEFAULT_PERMISSION_CLASSES
setting. For example.
REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ 'DEFAULT_PERMISSION_CLASSES': [
+ 'rest_framework.permissions.IsAuthenticated',
+ ]
+}
+
+If not specified, this setting defaults to allowing unrestricted access:
+'DEFAULT_PERMISSION_CLASSES': [
+ 'rest_framework.permissions.AllowAny',
+]
+
+You can also set the authentication policy on a per-view, or per-viewset basis,
+using the APIView
class-based views.
from rest_framework.permissions import IsAuthenticated
+from rest_framework.response import Response
+from rest_framework.views import APIView
+
+class ExampleView(APIView):
+ permission_classes = [IsAuthenticated]
+
+ def get(self, request, format=None):
+ content = {
+ 'status': 'request was permitted'
+ }
+ return Response(content)
+
+Or, if you're using the @api_view
decorator with function based views.
from rest_framework.decorators import api_view, permission_classes
+from rest_framework.permissions import IsAuthenticated
+from rest_framework.response import Response
+
+@api_view(['GET'])
+@permission_classes([IsAuthenticated])
+def example_view(request, format=None):
+ content = {
+ 'status': 'request was permitted'
+ }
+ return Response(content)
+
+Note: when you set new permission classes through class attribute or decorators you're telling the view to ignore the default list set over the settings.py file.
+Provided they inherit from rest_framework.permissions.BasePermission
, permissions can be composed using standard Python bitwise operators. For example, IsAuthenticatedOrReadOnly
could be written:
from rest_framework.permissions import BasePermission, IsAuthenticated, SAFE_METHODS
+from rest_framework.response import Response
+from rest_framework.views import APIView
+
+class ReadOnly(BasePermission):
+ def has_permission(self, request, view):
+ return request.method in SAFE_METHODS
+
+class ExampleView(APIView):
+ permission_classes = [IsAuthenticated|ReadOnly]
+
+ def get(self, request, format=None):
+ content = {
+ 'status': 'request was permitted'
+ }
+ return Response(content)
+
+Note: it supports & (and), | (or) and ~ (not).
+The AllowAny
permission class will allow unrestricted access, regardless of if the request was authenticated or unauthenticated.
This permission is not strictly required, since you can achieve the same result by using an empty list or tuple for the permissions setting, but you may find it useful to specify this class because it makes the intention explicit.
+The IsAuthenticated
permission class will deny permission to any unauthenticated user, and allow permission otherwise.
This permission is suitable if you want your API to only be accessible to registered users.
+The IsAdminUser
permission class will deny permission to any user, unless user.is_staff
is True
in which case permission will be allowed.
This permission is suitable if you want your API to only be accessible to a subset of trusted administrators.
+The IsAuthenticatedOrReadOnly
will allow authenticated users to perform any request. Requests for unauthorised users will only be permitted if the request method is one of the "safe" methods; GET
, HEAD
or OPTIONS
.
This permission is suitable if you want to your API to allow read permissions to anonymous users, and only allow write permissions to authenticated users.
+This permission class ties into Django's standard django.contrib.auth
model permissions. This permission must only be applied to views that have a .queryset
property set. Authorization will only be granted if the user is authenticated and has the relevant model permissions assigned.
POST
requests require the user to have the add
permission on the model.PUT
and PATCH
requests require the user to have the change
permission on the model.DELETE
requests require the user to have the delete
permission on the model.The default behaviour can also be overridden to support custom model permissions. For example, you might want to include a view
model permission for GET
requests.
To use custom model permissions, override DjangoModelPermissions
and set the .perms_map
property. Refer to the source code for details.
queryset
attribute.If you're using this permission with a view that uses an overridden get_queryset()
method there may not be a queryset
attribute on the view. In this case we suggest also marking the view with a sentinel queryset, so that this class can determine the required permissions. For example:
queryset = User.objects.none() # Required for DjangoModelPermissions
+
+Similar to DjangoModelPermissions
, but also allows unauthenticated users to have read-only access to the API.
This permission class ties into Django's standard object permissions framework that allows per-object permissions on models. In order to use this permission class, you'll also need to add a permission backend that supports object-level permissions, such as django-guardian.
+As with DjangoModelPermissions
, this permission must only be applied to views that have a .queryset
property or .get_queryset()
method. Authorization will only be granted if the user is authenticated and has the relevant per-object permissions and relevant model permissions assigned.
POST
requests require the user to have the add
permission on the model instance.PUT
and PATCH
requests require the user to have the change
permission on the model instance.DELETE
requests require the user to have the delete
permission on the model instance.Note that DjangoObjectPermissions
does not require the django-guardian
package, and should support other object-level backends equally well.
As with DjangoModelPermissions
you can use custom model permissions by overriding DjangoObjectPermissions
and setting the .perms_map
property. Refer to the source code for details.
Note: If you need object level view
permissions for GET
, HEAD
and OPTIONS
requests and are using django-guardian for your object-level permissions backend, you'll want to consider using the DjangoObjectPermissionsFilter
class provided by the djangorestframework-guardian
package. It ensures that list endpoints only return results including objects for which the user has appropriate view permissions.
To implement a custom permission, override BasePermission
and implement either, or both, of the following methods:
.has_permission(self, request, view)
.has_object_permission(self, request, view, obj)
The methods should return True
if the request should be granted access, and False
otherwise.
If you need to test if a request is a read operation or a write operation, you should check the request method against the constant SAFE_METHODS
, which is a tuple containing 'GET'
, 'OPTIONS'
and 'HEAD'
. For example:
if request.method in permissions.SAFE_METHODS:
+ # Check permissions for read-only request
+else:
+ # Check permissions for write request
+
+Note: The instance-level has_object_permission
method will only be called if the view-level has_permission
checks have already passed. Also note that in order for the instance-level checks to run, the view code should explicitly call .check_object_permissions(request, obj)
. If you are using the generic views then this will be handled for you by default. (Function-based views will need to check object permissions explicitly, raising PermissionDenied
on failure.)
Custom permissions will raise a PermissionDenied
exception if the test fails. To change the error message associated with the exception, implement a message
attribute directly on your custom permission. Otherwise the default_detail
attribute from PermissionDenied
will be used.
from rest_framework import permissions
+
+class CustomerAccessPermission(permissions.BasePermission):
+ message = 'Adding customers not allowed.'
+
+ def has_permission(self, request, view):
+ ...
+
+The following is an example of a permission class that checks the incoming request's IP address against a blacklist, and denies the request if the IP has been blacklisted.
+from rest_framework import permissions
+
+class BlacklistPermission(permissions.BasePermission):
+ """
+ Global permission check for blacklisted IPs.
+ """
+
+ def has_permission(self, request, view):
+ ip_addr = request.META['REMOTE_ADDR']
+ blacklisted = Blacklist.objects.filter(ip_addr=ip_addr).exists()
+ return not blacklisted
+
+As well as global permissions, that are run against all incoming requests, you can also create object-level permissions, that are only run against operations that affect a particular object instance. For example:
+class IsOwnerOrReadOnly(permissions.BasePermission):
+ """
+ Object-level permission to only allow owners of an object to edit it.
+ Assumes the model instance has an `owner` attribute.
+ """
+
+ def has_object_permission(self, request, view, obj):
+ # Read permissions are allowed to any request,
+ # so we'll always allow GET, HEAD or OPTIONS requests.
+ if request.method in permissions.SAFE_METHODS:
+ return True
+
+ # Instance must have an attribute named `owner`.
+ return obj.owner == request.user
+
+Note that the generic views will check the appropriate object level permissions, but if you're writing your own custom views, you'll need to make sure you check the object level permission checks yourself. You can do so by calling self.check_object_permissions(request, obj)
from the view once you have the object instance. This call will raise an appropriate APIException
if any object-level permission checks fail, and will otherwise simply return.
Also note that the generic views will only check the object-level permissions for views that retrieve a single model instance. If you require object-level filtering of list views, you'll need to filter the queryset separately. See the filtering documentation for more details.
+The following third party packages are also available.
+The Django REST - Access Policy package provides a way to define complex access rules in declarative policy classes that are attached to view sets or function-based views. The policies are defined in JSON in a format similar to AWS' Identity & Access Management policies.
+The Composed Permissions package provides a simple way to define complex and multi-depth (with logic operators) permission objects, using small and reusable components.
+The REST Condition package is another extension for building complex permissions in a simple and convenient way. The extension allows you to combine permissions with logical operators.
+The DRY Rest Permissions package provides the ability to define different permissions for individual default and custom actions. This package is made for apps with permissions that are derived from relationships defined in the app's data model. It also supports permission checks being returned to a client app through the API's serializer. Additionally it supports adding permissions to the default and custom list actions to restrict the data they retrieve per user.
+The Django Rest Framework Roles package makes it easier to parameterize your API over multiple types of users.
+The Django REST Framework API Key package provides permissions classes, models and helpers to add API key authorization to your API. It can be used to authorize internal or third-party backends and services (i.e. machines) which do not have a user account. API keys are stored securely using Django's password hashing infrastructure, and they can be viewed, edited and revoked at anytime in the Django admin.
+The Django Rest Framework Role Filters package provides simple filtering over multiple types of roles.
+ + +++Data structures, not algorithms, are central to programming.
+— Rob Pike
+
Relational fields are used to represent model relationships. They can be applied to ForeignKey
, ManyToManyField
and OneToOneField
relationships, as well as to reverse relationships, and custom relationships such as GenericForeignKey
.
Note: The relational fields are declared in relations.py
, but by convention you should import them from the serializers
module, using from rest_framework import serializers
and refer to fields as serializers.<FieldName>
.
When using the ModelSerializer
class, serializer fields and relationships will be automatically generated for you. Inspecting these automatically generated fields can be a useful tool for determining how to customize the relationship style.
To do so, open the Django shell, using python manage.py shell
, then import the serializer class, instantiate it, and print the object representation…
>>> from myapp.serializers import AccountSerializer
+>>> serializer = AccountSerializer()
+>>> print(repr(serializer))
+AccountSerializer():
+ id = IntegerField(label='ID', read_only=True)
+ name = CharField(allow_blank=True, max_length=100, required=False)
+ owner = PrimaryKeyRelatedField(queryset=User.objects.all())
+
+In order to explain the various types of relational fields, we'll use a couple of simple models for our examples. Our models will be for music albums, and the tracks listed on each album.
+class Album(models.Model):
+ album_name = models.CharField(max_length=100)
+ artist = models.CharField(max_length=100)
+
+class Track(models.Model):
+ album = models.ForeignKey(Album, related_name='tracks', on_delete=models.CASCADE)
+ order = models.IntegerField()
+ title = models.CharField(max_length=100)
+ duration = models.IntegerField()
+
+ class Meta:
+ unique_together = ['album', 'order']
+ ordering = ['order']
+
+ def __str__(self):
+ return '%d: %s' % (self.order, self.title)
+
+StringRelatedField
may be used to represent the target of the relationship using its __str__
method.
For example, the following serializer.
+class AlbumSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+ tracks = serializers.StringRelatedField(many=True)
+
+ class Meta:
+ model = Album
+ fields = ['album_name', 'artist', 'tracks']
+
+Would serialize to the following representation.
+{
+ 'album_name': 'Things We Lost In The Fire',
+ 'artist': 'Low',
+ 'tracks': [
+ '1: Sunflower',
+ '2: Whitetail',
+ '3: Dinosaur Act',
+ ...
+ ]
+}
+
+This field is read only.
+Arguments:
+many
- If applied to a to-many relationship, you should set this argument to True
.PrimaryKeyRelatedField
may be used to represent the target of the relationship using its primary key.
For example, the following serializer:
+class AlbumSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+ tracks = serializers.PrimaryKeyRelatedField(many=True, read_only=True)
+
+ class Meta:
+ model = Album
+ fields = ['album_name', 'artist', 'tracks']
+
+Would serialize to a representation like this:
+{
+ 'album_name': 'Undun',
+ 'artist': 'The Roots',
+ 'tracks': [
+ 89,
+ 90,
+ 91,
+ ...
+ ]
+}
+
+By default this field is read-write, although you can change this behavior using the read_only
flag.
Arguments:
+queryset
- The queryset used for model instance lookups when validating the field input. Relationships must either set a queryset explicitly, or set read_only=True
.many
- If applied to a to-many relationship, you should set this argument to True
.allow_null
- If set to True
, the field will accept values of None
or the empty string for nullable relationships. Defaults to False
.pk_field
- Set to a field to control serialization/deserialization of the primary key's value. For example, pk_field=UUIDField(format='hex')
would serialize a UUID primary key into its compact hex representation.HyperlinkedRelatedField
may be used to represent the target of the relationship using a hyperlink.
For example, the following serializer:
+class AlbumSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+ tracks = serializers.HyperlinkedRelatedField(
+ many=True,
+ read_only=True,
+ view_name='track-detail'
+ )
+
+ class Meta:
+ model = Album
+ fields = ['album_name', 'artist', 'tracks']
+
+Would serialize to a representation like this:
+{
+ 'album_name': 'Graceland',
+ 'artist': 'Paul Simon',
+ 'tracks': [
+ 'http://www.example.com/api/tracks/45/',
+ 'http://www.example.com/api/tracks/46/',
+ 'http://www.example.com/api/tracks/47/',
+ ...
+ ]
+}
+
+By default this field is read-write, although you can change this behavior using the read_only
flag.
Note: This field is designed for objects that map to a URL that accepts a single URL keyword argument, as set using the lookup_field
and lookup_url_kwarg
arguments.
This is suitable for URLs that contain a single primary key or slug argument as part of the URL.
+If you require more complex hyperlinked representation you'll need to customize the field, as described in the custom hyperlinked fields section, below.
+Arguments:
+view_name
- The view name that should be used as the target of the relationship. If you're using the standard router classes this will be a string with the format <modelname>-detail
. required.queryset
- The queryset used for model instance lookups when validating the field input. Relationships must either set a queryset explicitly, or set read_only=True
.many
- If applied to a to-many relationship, you should set this argument to True
.allow_null
- If set to True
, the field will accept values of None
or the empty string for nullable relationships. Defaults to False
.lookup_field
- The field on the target that should be used for the lookup. Should correspond to a URL keyword argument on the referenced view. Default is 'pk'
.lookup_url_kwarg
- The name of the keyword argument defined in the URL conf that corresponds to the lookup field. Defaults to using the same value as lookup_field
.format
- If using format suffixes, hyperlinked fields will use the same format suffix for the target unless overridden by using the format
argument.SlugRelatedField
may be used to represent the target of the relationship using a field on the target.
For example, the following serializer:
+class AlbumSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+ tracks = serializers.SlugRelatedField(
+ many=True,
+ read_only=True,
+ slug_field='title'
+ )
+
+ class Meta:
+ model = Album
+ fields = ['album_name', 'artist', 'tracks']
+
+Would serialize to a representation like this:
+{
+ 'album_name': 'Dear John',
+ 'artist': 'Loney Dear',
+ 'tracks': [
+ 'Airport Surroundings',
+ 'Everything Turns to You',
+ 'I Was Only Going Out',
+ ...
+ ]
+}
+
+By default this field is read-write, although you can change this behavior using the read_only
flag.
When using SlugRelatedField
as a read-write field, you will normally want to ensure that the slug field corresponds to a model field with unique=True
.
Arguments:
+slug_field
- The field on the target that should be used to represent it. This should be a field that uniquely identifies any given instance. For example, username
. requiredqueryset
- The queryset used for model instance lookups when validating the field input. Relationships must either set a queryset explicitly, or set read_only=True
.many
- If applied to a to-many relationship, you should set this argument to True
.allow_null
- If set to True
, the field will accept values of None
or the empty string for nullable relationships. Defaults to False
.This field can be applied as an identity relationship, such as the 'url'
field on a HyperlinkedModelSerializer. It can also be used for an attribute on the object. For example, the following serializer:
class AlbumSerializer(serializers.HyperlinkedModelSerializer):
+ track_listing = serializers.HyperlinkedIdentityField(view_name='track-list')
+
+ class Meta:
+ model = Album
+ fields = ['album_name', 'artist', 'track_listing']
+
+Would serialize to a representation like this:
+{
+ 'album_name': 'The Eraser',
+ 'artist': 'Thom Yorke',
+ 'track_listing': 'http://www.example.com/api/track_list/12/',
+}
+
+This field is always read-only.
+Arguments:
+view_name
- The view name that should be used as the target of the relationship. If you're using the standard router classes this will be a string with the format <model_name>-detail
. required.lookup_field
- The field on the target that should be used for the lookup. Should correspond to a URL keyword argument on the referenced view. Default is 'pk'
.lookup_url_kwarg
- The name of the keyword argument defined in the URL conf that corresponds to the lookup field. Defaults to using the same value as lookup_field
.format
- If using format suffixes, hyperlinked fields will use the same format suffix for the target unless overridden by using the format
argument.As opposed to previously discussed references to another entity, the referred entity can instead also be embedded or nested +in the representation of the object that refers to it. +Such nested relationships can be expressed by using serializers as fields.
+If the field is used to represent a to-many relationship, you should add the many=True
flag to the serializer field.
For example, the following serializer:
+class TrackSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+ class Meta:
+ model = Track
+ fields = ['order', 'title', 'duration']
+
+class AlbumSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+ tracks = TrackSerializer(many=True, read_only=True)
+
+ class Meta:
+ model = Album
+ fields = ['album_name', 'artist', 'tracks']
+
+Would serialize to a nested representation like this:
+>>> album = Album.objects.create(album_name="The Grey Album", artist='Danger Mouse')
+>>> Track.objects.create(album=album, order=1, title='Public Service Announcement', duration=245)
+<Track: Track object>
+>>> Track.objects.create(album=album, order=2, title='What More Can I Say', duration=264)
+<Track: Track object>
+>>> Track.objects.create(album=album, order=3, title='Encore', duration=159)
+<Track: Track object>
+>>> serializer = AlbumSerializer(instance=album)
+>>> serializer.data
+{
+ 'album_name': 'The Grey Album',
+ 'artist': 'Danger Mouse',
+ 'tracks': [
+ {'order': 1, 'title': 'Public Service Announcement', 'duration': 245},
+ {'order': 2, 'title': 'What More Can I Say', 'duration': 264},
+ {'order': 3, 'title': 'Encore', 'duration': 159},
+ ...
+ ],
+}
+
+By default nested serializers are read-only. If you want to support write-operations to a nested serializer field you'll need to create create()
and/or update()
methods in order to explicitly specify how the child relationships should be saved.
class TrackSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+ class Meta:
+ model = Track
+ fields = ['order', 'title', 'duration']
+
+class AlbumSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+ tracks = TrackSerializer(many=True)
+
+ class Meta:
+ model = Album
+ fields = ['album_name', 'artist', 'tracks']
+
+ def create(self, validated_data):
+ tracks_data = validated_data.pop('tracks')
+ album = Album.objects.create(**validated_data)
+ for track_data in tracks_data:
+ Track.objects.create(album=album, **track_data)
+ return album
+
+>>> data = {
+ 'album_name': 'The Grey Album',
+ 'artist': 'Danger Mouse',
+ 'tracks': [
+ {'order': 1, 'title': 'Public Service Announcement', 'duration': 245},
+ {'order': 2, 'title': 'What More Can I Say', 'duration': 264},
+ {'order': 3, 'title': 'Encore', 'duration': 159},
+ ],
+}
+>>> serializer = AlbumSerializer(data=data)
+>>> serializer.is_valid()
+True
+>>> serializer.save()
+<Album: Album object>
+
+In rare cases where none of the existing relational styles fit the representation you need, +you can implement a completely custom relational field, that describes exactly how the +output representation should be generated from the model instance.
+To implement a custom relational field, you should override RelatedField
, and implement the .to_representation(self, value)
method. This method takes the target of the field as the value
argument, and should return the representation that should be used to serialize the target. The value
argument will typically be a model instance.
If you want to implement a read-write relational field, you must also implement the .to_internal_value(self, data)
method.
To provide a dynamic queryset based on the context
, you can also override .get_queryset(self)
instead of specifying .queryset
on the class or when initializing the field.
For example, we could define a relational field to serialize a track to a custom string representation, using its ordering, title, and duration.
+import time
+
+class TrackListingField(serializers.RelatedField):
+ def to_representation(self, value):
+ duration = time.strftime('%M:%S', time.gmtime(value.duration))
+ return 'Track %d: %s (%s)' % (value.order, value.name, duration)
+
+class AlbumSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+ tracks = TrackListingField(many=True)
+
+ class Meta:
+ model = Album
+ fields = ['album_name', 'artist', 'tracks']
+
+This custom field would then serialize to the following representation.
+{
+ 'album_name': 'Sometimes I Wish We Were an Eagle',
+ 'artist': 'Bill Callahan',
+ 'tracks': [
+ 'Track 1: Jim Cain (04:39)',
+ 'Track 2: Eid Ma Clack Shaw (04:19)',
+ 'Track 3: The Wind and the Dove (04:34)',
+ ...
+ ]
+}
+
+In some cases you may need to customize the behavior of a hyperlinked field, in order to represent URLs that require more than a single lookup field.
+You can achieve this by overriding HyperlinkedRelatedField
. There are two methods that may be overridden:
get_url(self, obj, view_name, request, format)
+The get_url
method is used to map the object instance to its URL representation.
May raise a NoReverseMatch
if the view_name
and lookup_field
+attributes are not configured to correctly match the URL conf.
get_object(self, view_name, view_args, view_kwargs)
+If you want to support a writable hyperlinked field then you'll also want to override get_object
, in order to map incoming URLs back to the object they represent. For read-only hyperlinked fields there is no need to override this method.
The return value of this method should the object that corresponds to the matched URL conf arguments.
+May raise an ObjectDoesNotExist
exception.
Say we have a URL for a customer object that takes two keyword arguments, like so:
+/api/<organization_slug>/customers/<customer_pk>/
+
+This cannot be represented with the default implementation, which accepts only a single lookup field.
+In this case we'd need to override HyperlinkedRelatedField
to get the behavior we want:
from rest_framework import serializers
+from rest_framework.reverse import reverse
+
+class CustomerHyperlink(serializers.HyperlinkedRelatedField):
+ # We define these as class attributes, so we don't need to pass them as arguments.
+ view_name = 'customer-detail'
+ queryset = Customer.objects.all()
+
+ def get_url(self, obj, view_name, request, format):
+ url_kwargs = {
+ 'organization_slug': obj.organization.slug,
+ 'customer_pk': obj.pk
+ }
+ return reverse(view_name, kwargs=url_kwargs, request=request, format=format)
+
+ def get_object(self, view_name, view_args, view_kwargs):
+ lookup_kwargs = {
+ 'organization__slug': view_kwargs['organization_slug'],
+ 'pk': view_kwargs['customer_pk']
+ }
+ return self.get_queryset().get(**lookup_kwargs)
+
+Note that if you wanted to use this style together with the generic views then you'd also need to override .get_object
on the view in order to get the correct lookup behavior.
Generally we recommend a flat style for API representations where possible, but the nested URL style can also be reasonable when used in moderation.
+queryset
argumentThe queryset
argument is only ever required for writable relationship field, in which case it is used for performing the model instance lookup, that maps from the primitive user input, into a model instance.
In version 2.x a serializer class could sometimes automatically determine the queryset
argument if a ModelSerializer
class was being used.
This behavior is now replaced with always using an explicit queryset
argument for writable relational fields.
Doing so reduces the amount of hidden 'magic' that ModelSerializer
provides, makes the behavior of the field more clear, and ensures that it is trivial to move between using the ModelSerializer
shortcut, or using fully explicit Serializer
classes.
The built-in __str__
method of the model will be used to generate string representations of the objects used to populate the choices
property. These choices are used to populate select HTML inputs in the browsable API.
To provide customized representations for such inputs, override display_value()
of a RelatedField
subclass. This method will receive a model object, and should return a string suitable for representing it. For example:
class TrackPrimaryKeyRelatedField(serializers.PrimaryKeyRelatedField):
+ def display_value(self, instance):
+ return 'Track: %s' % (instance.title)
+
+When rendered in the browsable API relational fields will default to only displaying a maximum of 1000 selectable items. If more items are present then a disabled option with "More than 1000 items…" will be displayed.
+This behavior is intended to prevent a template from being unable to render in an acceptable timespan due to a very large number of relationships being displayed.
+There are two keyword arguments you can use to control this behavior:
+html_cutoff
- If set this will be the maximum number of choices that will be displayed by a HTML select drop down. Set to None
to disable any limiting. Defaults to 1000
.html_cutoff_text
- If set this will display a textual indicator if the maximum number of items have been cutoff in an HTML select drop down. Defaults to "More than {count} items…"
You can also control these globally using the settings HTML_SELECT_CUTOFF
and HTML_SELECT_CUTOFF_TEXT
.
In cases where the cutoff is being enforced you may want to instead use a plain input field in the HTML form. You can do so using the style
keyword argument. For example:
assigned_to = serializers.SlugRelatedField(
+ queryset=User.objects.all(),
+ slug_field='username',
+ style={'base_template': 'input.html'}
+)
+
+Note that reverse relationships are not automatically included by the ModelSerializer
and HyperlinkedModelSerializer
classes. To include a reverse relationship, you must explicitly add it to the fields list. For example:
class AlbumSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+ class Meta:
+ fields = ['tracks', ...]
+
+You'll normally want to ensure that you've set an appropriate related_name
argument on the relationship, that you can use as the field name. For example:
class Track(models.Model):
+ album = models.ForeignKey(Album, related_name='tracks', on_delete=models.CASCADE)
+ ...
+
+If you have not set a related name for the reverse relationship, you'll need to use the automatically generated related name in the fields
argument. For example:
class AlbumSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+ class Meta:
+ fields = ['track_set', ...]
+
+See the Django documentation on reverse relationships for more details.
+If you want to serialize a generic foreign key, you need to define a custom field, to determine explicitly how you want to serialize the targets of the relationship.
+For example, given the following model for a tag, which has a generic relationship with other arbitrary models:
+class TaggedItem(models.Model):
+ """
+ Tags arbitrary model instances using a generic relation.
+
+ See: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/stable/ref/contrib/contenttypes/
+ """
+ tag_name = models.SlugField()
+ content_type = models.ForeignKey(ContentType, on_delete=models.CASCADE)
+ object_id = models.PositiveIntegerField()
+ tagged_object = GenericForeignKey('content_type', 'object_id')
+
+ def __str__(self):
+ return self.tag_name
+
+And the following two models, which may have associated tags:
+class Bookmark(models.Model):
+ """
+ A bookmark consists of a URL, and 0 or more descriptive tags.
+ """
+ url = models.URLField()
+ tags = GenericRelation(TaggedItem)
+
+
+class Note(models.Model):
+ """
+ A note consists of some text, and 0 or more descriptive tags.
+ """
+ text = models.CharField(max_length=1000)
+ tags = GenericRelation(TaggedItem)
+
+We could define a custom field that could be used to serialize tagged instances, using the type of each instance to determine how it should be serialized.
+class TaggedObjectRelatedField(serializers.RelatedField):
+ """
+ A custom field to use for the `tagged_object` generic relationship.
+ """
+
+ def to_representation(self, value):
+ """
+ Serialize tagged objects to a simple textual representation.
+ """
+ if isinstance(value, Bookmark):
+ return 'Bookmark: ' + value.url
+ elif isinstance(value, Note):
+ return 'Note: ' + value.text
+ raise Exception('Unexpected type of tagged object')
+
+If you need the target of the relationship to have a nested representation, you can use the required serializers inside the .to_representation()
method:
def to_representation(self, value):
+ """
+ Serialize bookmark instances using a bookmark serializer,
+ and note instances using a note serializer.
+ """
+ if isinstance(value, Bookmark):
+ serializer = BookmarkSerializer(value)
+ elif isinstance(value, Note):
+ serializer = NoteSerializer(value)
+ else:
+ raise Exception('Unexpected type of tagged object')
+
+ return serializer.data
+
+Note that reverse generic keys, expressed using the GenericRelation
field, can be serialized using the regular relational field types, since the type of the target in the relationship is always known.
For more information see the Django documentation on generic relations.
+By default, relational fields that target a ManyToManyField
with a
+through
model specified are set to read-only.
If you explicitly specify a relational field pointing to a
+ManyToManyField
with a through model, be sure to set read_only
+to True
.
If you wish to represent extra fields on a through model then you may serialize the through model as a nested object.
+The following third party packages are also available.
+The drf-nested-routers package provides routers and relationship fields for working with nested resources.
+The rest-framework-generic-relations library provides read/write serialization for generic foreign keys.
+ + +++Before a TemplateResponse instance can be returned to the client, it must be rendered. The rendering process takes the intermediate representation of template and context, and turns it into the final byte stream that can be served to the client.
+ +
REST framework includes a number of built in Renderer classes, that allow you to return responses with various media types. There is also support for defining your own custom renderers, which gives you the flexibility to design your own media types.
+The set of valid renderers for a view is always defined as a list of classes. When a view is entered REST framework will perform content negotiation on the incoming request, and determine the most appropriate renderer to satisfy the request.
+The basic process of content negotiation involves examining the request's Accept
header, to determine which media types it expects in the response. Optionally, format suffixes on the URL may be used to explicitly request a particular representation. For example the URL http://example.com/api/users_count.json
might be an endpoint that always returns JSON data.
For more information see the documentation on content negotiation.
+The default set of renderers may be set globally, using the DEFAULT_RENDERER_CLASSES
setting. For example, the following settings would use JSON
as the main media type and also include the self describing API.
REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ 'DEFAULT_RENDERER_CLASSES': [
+ 'rest_framework.renderers.JSONRenderer',
+ 'rest_framework.renderers.BrowsableAPIRenderer',
+ ]
+}
+
+You can also set the renderers used for an individual view, or viewset,
+using the APIView
class-based views.
from django.contrib.auth.models import User
+from rest_framework.renderers import JSONRenderer
+from rest_framework.response import Response
+from rest_framework.views import APIView
+
+class UserCountView(APIView):
+ """
+ A view that returns the count of active users in JSON.
+ """
+ renderer_classes = [JSONRenderer]
+
+ def get(self, request, format=None):
+ user_count = User.objects.filter(active=True).count()
+ content = {'user_count': user_count}
+ return Response(content)
+
+Or, if you're using the @api_view
decorator with function based views.
@api_view(['GET'])
+@renderer_classes([JSONRenderer])
+def user_count_view(request, format=None):
+ """
+ A view that returns the count of active users in JSON.
+ """
+ user_count = User.objects.filter(active=True).count()
+ content = {'user_count': user_count}
+ return Response(content)
+
+It's important when specifying the renderer classes for your API to think about what priority you want to assign to each media type. If a client underspecifies the representations it can accept, such as sending an Accept: */*
header, or not including an Accept
header at all, then REST framework will select the first renderer in the list to use for the response.
For example if your API serves JSON responses and the HTML browsable API, you might want to make JSONRenderer
your default renderer, in order to send JSON
responses to clients that do not specify an Accept
header.
If your API includes views that can serve both regular webpages and API responses depending on the request, then you might consider making TemplateHTMLRenderer
your default renderer, in order to play nicely with older browsers that send broken accept headers.
Renders the request data into JSON
, using utf-8 encoding.
Note that the default style is to include unicode characters, and render the response using a compact style with no unnecessary whitespace:
+{"unicode black star":"★","value":999}
+
+The client may additionally include an 'indent'
media type parameter, in which case the returned JSON
will be indented. For example Accept: application/json; indent=4
.
{
+ "unicode black star": "★",
+ "value": 999
+}
+
+The default JSON encoding style can be altered using the UNICODE_JSON
and COMPACT_JSON
settings keys.
.media_type: application/json
.format: 'json'
.charset: None
Renders data to HTML, using Django's standard template rendering.
+Unlike other renderers, the data passed to the Response
does not need to be serialized. Also, unlike other renderers, you may want to include a template_name
argument when creating the Response
.
The TemplateHTMLRenderer will create a RequestContext
, using the response.data
as the context dict, and determine a template name to use to render the context.
The template name is determined by (in order of preference):
+template_name
argument passed to the response..template_name
attribute set on this class.view.get_template_names()
.An example of a view that uses TemplateHTMLRenderer
:
class UserDetail(generics.RetrieveAPIView):
+ """
+ A view that returns a templated HTML representation of a given user.
+ """
+ queryset = User.objects.all()
+ renderer_classes = [TemplateHTMLRenderer]
+
+ def get(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
+ self.object = self.get_object()
+ return Response({'user': self.object}, template_name='user_detail.html')
+
+You can use TemplateHTMLRenderer
either to return regular HTML pages using REST framework, or to return both HTML and API responses from a single endpoint.
If you're building websites that use TemplateHTMLRenderer
along with other renderer classes, you should consider listing TemplateHTMLRenderer
as the first class in the renderer_classes
list, so that it will be prioritised first even for browsers that send poorly formed ACCEPT:
headers.
See the HTML & Forms Topic Page for further examples of TemplateHTMLRenderer
usage.
.media_type: text/html
.format: 'html'
.charset: utf-8
See also: StaticHTMLRenderer
A simple renderer that simply returns pre-rendered HTML. Unlike other renderers, the data passed to the response object should be a string representing the content to be returned.
+An example of a view that uses StaticHTMLRenderer
:
@api_view(['GET'])
+@renderer_classes([StaticHTMLRenderer])
+def simple_html_view(request):
+ data = '<html><body><h1>Hello, world</h1></body></html>'
+ return Response(data)
+
+You can use StaticHTMLRenderer
either to return regular HTML pages using REST framework, or to return both HTML and API responses from a single endpoint.
.media_type: text/html
.format: 'html'
.charset: utf-8
See also: TemplateHTMLRenderer
Renders data into HTML for the Browsable API:
+ +This renderer will determine which other renderer would have been given highest priority, and use that to display an API style response within the HTML page.
+.media_type: text/html
.format: 'api'
.charset: utf-8
.template: 'rest_framework/api.html'
By default the response content will be rendered with the highest priority renderer apart from BrowsableAPIRenderer
. If you need to customize this behavior, for example to use HTML as the default return format, but use JSON in the browsable API, you can do so by overriding the get_default_renderer()
method. For example:
class CustomBrowsableAPIRenderer(BrowsableAPIRenderer):
+ def get_default_renderer(self, view):
+ return JSONRenderer()
+
+Renders data into HTML for an admin-like display:
+ +This renderer is suitable for CRUD-style web APIs that should also present a user-friendly interface for managing the data.
+Note that views that have nested or list serializers for their input won't work well with the AdminRenderer
, as the HTML forms are unable to properly support them.
Note: The AdminRenderer
is only able to include links to detail pages when a properly configured URL_FIELD_NAME
(url
by default) attribute is present in the data. For HyperlinkedModelSerializer
this will be the case, but for ModelSerializer
or plain Serializer
classes you'll need to make sure to include the field explicitly. For example here we use models get_absolute_url
method:
class AccountSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+ url = serializers.CharField(source='get_absolute_url', read_only=True)
+
+ class Meta:
+ model = Account
+
+.media_type: text/html
.format: 'admin'
.charset: utf-8
.template: 'rest_framework/admin.html'
Renders data returned by a serializer into an HTML form. The output of this renderer does not include the enclosing <form>
tags, a hidden CSRF input or any submit buttons.
This renderer is not intended to be used directly, but can instead be used in templates by passing a serializer instance to the render_form
template tag.
{% load rest_framework %}
+
+<form action="/submit-report/" method="post">
+ {% csrf_token %}
+ {% render_form serializer %}
+ <input type="submit" value="Save" />
+</form>
+
+For more information see the HTML & Forms documentation.
+.media_type: text/html
.format: 'form'
.charset: utf-8
.template: 'rest_framework/horizontal/form.html'
This renderer is used for rendering HTML multipart form data. It is not suitable as a response renderer, but is instead used for creating test requests, using REST framework's test client and test request factory.
+.media_type: multipart/form-data; boundary=BoUnDaRyStRiNg
.format: 'multipart'
.charset: utf-8
To implement a custom renderer, you should override BaseRenderer
, set the .media_type
and .format
properties, and implement the .render(self, data, media_type=None, renderer_context=None)
method.
The method should return a bytestring, which will be used as the body of the HTTP response.
+The arguments passed to the .render()
method are:
data
The request data, as set by the Response()
instantiation.
media_type=None
Optional. If provided, this is the accepted media type, as determined by the content negotiation stage.
+Depending on the client's Accept:
header, this may be more specific than the renderer's media_type
attribute, and may include media type parameters. For example "application/json; nested=true"
.
renderer_context=None
Optional. If provided, this is a dictionary of contextual information provided by the view.
+By default this will include the following keys: view
, request
, response
, args
, kwargs
.
The following is an example plaintext renderer that will return a response with the data
parameter as the content of the response.
from django.utils.encoding import smart_unicode
+from rest_framework import renderers
+
+
+class PlainTextRenderer(renderers.BaseRenderer):
+ media_type = 'text/plain'
+ format = 'txt'
+
+ def render(self, data, media_type=None, renderer_context=None):
+ return data.encode(self.charset)
+
+By default renderer classes are assumed to be using the UTF-8
encoding. To use a different encoding, set the charset
attribute on the renderer.
class PlainTextRenderer(renderers.BaseRenderer):
+ media_type = 'text/plain'
+ format = 'txt'
+ charset = 'iso-8859-1'
+
+ def render(self, data, media_type=None, renderer_context=None):
+ return data.encode(self.charset)
+
+Note that if a renderer class returns a unicode string, then the response content will be coerced into a bytestring by the Response
class, with the charset
attribute set on the renderer used to determine the encoding.
If the renderer returns a bytestring representing raw binary content, you should set a charset value of None
, which will ensure the Content-Type
header of the response will not have a charset
value set.
In some cases you may also want to set the render_style
attribute to 'binary'
. Doing so will also ensure that the browsable API will not attempt to display the binary content as a string.
class JPEGRenderer(renderers.BaseRenderer):
+ media_type = 'image/jpeg'
+ format = 'jpg'
+ charset = None
+ render_style = 'binary'
+
+ def render(self, data, media_type=None, renderer_context=None):
+ return data
+
+You can do some pretty flexible things using REST framework's renderers. Some examples...
+media_type = 'image/*'
, and use the Accept
header to vary the encoding of the response.In some cases you might want your view to use different serialization styles depending on the accepted media type. If you need to do this you can access request.accepted_renderer
to determine the negotiated renderer that will be used for the response.
For example:
+@api_view(['GET'])
+@renderer_classes([TemplateHTMLRenderer, JSONRenderer])
+def list_users(request):
+ """
+ A view that can return JSON or HTML representations
+ of the users in the system.
+ """
+ queryset = Users.objects.filter(active=True)
+
+ if request.accepted_renderer.format == 'html':
+ # TemplateHTMLRenderer takes a context dict,
+ # and additionally requires a 'template_name'.
+ # It does not require serialization.
+ data = {'users': queryset}
+ return Response(data, template_name='list_users.html')
+
+ # JSONRenderer requires serialized data as normal.
+ serializer = UserSerializer(instance=queryset)
+ data = serializer.data
+ return Response(data)
+
+In some cases you might want a renderer to serve a range of media types.
+In this case you can underspecify the media types it should respond to, by using a media_type
value such as image/*
, or */*
.
If you underspecify the renderer's media type, you should make sure to specify the media type explicitly when you return the response, using the content_type
attribute. For example:
return Response(data, content_type='image/png')
+
+For the purposes of many Web APIs, simple JSON
responses with hyperlinked relations may be sufficient. If you want to fully embrace RESTful design and HATEOAS you'll need to consider the design and usage of your media types in more detail.
In the words of Roy Fielding, "A REST API should spend almost all of its descriptive effort in defining the media type(s) used for representing resources and driving application state, or in defining extended relation names and/or hypertext-enabled mark-up for existing standard media types.".
+For good examples of custom media types, see GitHub's use of a custom application/vnd.github+json media type, and Mike Amundsen's IANA approved application/vnd.collection+json JSON-based hypermedia.
+Typically a renderer will behave the same regardless of if it's dealing with a regular response, or with a response caused by an exception being raised, such as an Http404
or PermissionDenied
exception, or a subclass of APIException
.
If you're using either the TemplateHTMLRenderer
or the StaticHTMLRenderer
and an exception is raised, the behavior is slightly different, and mirrors Django's default handling of error views.
Exceptions raised and handled by an HTML renderer will attempt to render using one of the following methods, by order of precedence.
+{status_code}.html
.api_exception.html
.Templates will render with a RequestContext
which includes the status_code
and details
keys.
Note: If DEBUG=True
, Django's standard traceback error page will be displayed instead of rendering the HTTP status code and text.
The following third party packages are also available.
+REST framework YAML provides YAML parsing and rendering support. It was previously included directly in the REST framework package, and is now instead supported as a third-party package.
+Install using pip.
+$ pip install djangorestframework-yaml
+
+Modify your REST framework settings.
+REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ 'DEFAULT_PARSER_CLASSES': [
+ 'rest_framework_yaml.parsers.YAMLParser',
+ ],
+ 'DEFAULT_RENDERER_CLASSES': [
+ 'rest_framework_yaml.renderers.YAMLRenderer',
+ ],
+}
+
+REST Framework XML provides a simple informal XML format. It was previously included directly in the REST framework package, and is now instead supported as a third-party package.
+Install using pip.
+$ pip install djangorestframework-xml
+
+Modify your REST framework settings.
+REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ 'DEFAULT_PARSER_CLASSES': [
+ 'rest_framework_xml.parsers.XMLParser',
+ ],
+ 'DEFAULT_RENDERER_CLASSES': [
+ 'rest_framework_xml.renderers.XMLRenderer',
+ ],
+}
+
+REST framework JSONP provides JSONP rendering support. It was previously included directly in the REST framework package, and is now instead supported as a third-party package.
+Warning: If you require cross-domain AJAX requests, you should generally be using the more modern approach of CORS as an alternative to JSONP
. See the CORS documentation for more details.
The jsonp
approach is essentially a browser hack, and is only appropriate for globally readable API endpoints, where GET
requests are unauthenticated and do not require any user permissions.
Install using pip.
+$ pip install djangorestframework-jsonp
+
+Modify your REST framework settings.
+REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ 'DEFAULT_RENDERER_CLASSES': [
+ 'rest_framework_jsonp.renderers.JSONPRenderer',
+ ],
+}
+
+MessagePack is a fast, efficient binary serialization format. Juan Riaza maintains the djangorestframework-msgpack package which provides MessagePack renderer and parser support for REST framework.
+XLSX is the world's most popular binary spreadsheet format. Tim Allen of The Wharton School maintains drf-renderer-xlsx, which renders an endpoint as an XLSX spreadsheet using OpenPyXL, and allows the client to download it. Spreadsheets can be styled on a per-view basis.
+Install using pip.
+$ pip install drf-renderer-xlsx
+
+Modify your REST framework settings.
+REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ ...
+
+ 'DEFAULT_RENDERER_CLASSES': [
+ 'rest_framework.renderers.JSONRenderer',
+ 'rest_framework.renderers.BrowsableAPIRenderer',
+ 'drf_renderer_xlsx.renderers.XLSXRenderer',
+ ],
+}
+
+To avoid having a file streamed without a filename (which the browser will often default to the filename "download", with no extension), we need to use a mixin to override the Content-Disposition
header. If no filename is provided, it will default to export.xlsx
. For example:
from rest_framework.viewsets import ReadOnlyModelViewSet
+from drf_renderer_xlsx.mixins import XLSXFileMixin
+from drf_renderer_xlsx.renderers import XLSXRenderer
+
+from .models import MyExampleModel
+from .serializers import MyExampleSerializer
+
+class MyExampleViewSet(XLSXFileMixin, ReadOnlyModelViewSet):
+ queryset = MyExampleModel.objects.all()
+ serializer_class = MyExampleSerializer
+ renderer_classes = [XLSXRenderer]
+ filename = 'my_export.xlsx'
+
+Comma-separated values are a plain-text tabular data format, that can be easily imported into spreadsheet applications. Mjumbe Poe maintains the djangorestframework-csv package which provides CSV renderer support for REST framework.
+UltraJSON is an optimized C JSON encoder which can give significantly faster JSON rendering. Jacob Haslehurst maintains the drf-ujson-renderer package which implements JSON rendering using the UJSON package.
+djangorestframework-camel-case provides camel case JSON renderers and parsers for REST framework. This allows serializers to use Python-style underscored field names, but be exposed in the API as Javascript-style camel case field names. It is maintained by Vitaly Babiy.
+Django REST Pandas provides a serializer and renderers that support additional data processing and output via the Pandas DataFrame API. Django REST Pandas includes renderers for Pandas-style CSV files, Excel workbooks (both .xls
and .xlsx
), and a number of other formats. It is maintained by S. Andrew Sheppard as part of the wq Project.
Rest Framework Latex provides a renderer that outputs PDFs using Laulatex. It is maintained by Pebble (S/F Software).
+ + +++If you're doing REST-based web service stuff ... you should ignore request.POST.
+— Malcom Tredinnick, Django developers group
+
REST framework's Request
class extends the standard HttpRequest
, adding support for REST framework's flexible request parsing and request authentication.
REST framework's Request objects provide flexible request parsing that allows you to treat requests with JSON data or other media types in the same way that you would normally deal with form data.
+request.data
returns the parsed content of the request body. This is similar to the standard request.POST
and request.FILES
attributes except that:
POST
, meaning that you can access the content of PUT
and PATCH
requests.For more details see the parsers documentation.
+request.query_params
is a more correctly named synonym for request.GET
.
For clarity inside your code, we recommend using request.query_params
instead of the Django's standard request.GET
. Doing so will help keep your codebase more correct and obvious - any HTTP method type may include query parameters, not just GET
requests.
The APIView
class or @api_view
decorator will ensure that this property is automatically set to a list of Parser
instances, based on the parser_classes
set on the view or based on the DEFAULT_PARSER_CLASSES
setting.
You won't typically need to access this property.
+Note: If a client sends malformed content, then accessing request.data
may raise a ParseError
. By default REST framework's APIView
class or @api_view
decorator will catch the error and return a 400 Bad Request
response.
If a client sends a request with a content-type that cannot be parsed then a UnsupportedMediaType
exception will be raised, which by default will be caught and return a 415 Unsupported Media Type
response.
The request exposes some properties that allow you to determine the result of the content negotiation stage. This allows you to implement behaviour such as selecting a different serialization schemes for different media types.
+The renderer instance that was selected by the content negotiation stage.
+A string representing the media type that was accepted by the content negotiation stage.
+REST framework provides flexible, per-request authentication, that gives you the ability to:
+request.user
typically returns an instance of django.contrib.auth.models.User
, although the behavior depends on the authentication policy being used.
If the request is unauthenticated the default value of request.user
is an instance of django.contrib.auth.models.AnonymousUser
.
For more details see the authentication documentation.
+request.auth
returns any additional authentication context. The exact behavior of request.auth
depends on the authentication policy being used, but it may typically be an instance of the token that the request was authenticated against.
If the request is unauthenticated, or if no additional context is present, the default value of request.auth
is None
.
For more details see the authentication documentation.
+The APIView
class or @api_view
decorator will ensure that this property is automatically set to a list of Authentication
instances, based on the authentication_classes
set on the view or based on the DEFAULT_AUTHENTICATORS
setting.
You won't typically need to access this property.
+Note: You may see a WrappedAttributeError
raised when calling the .user
or .auth
properties. These errors originate from an authenticator as a standard AttributeError
, however it's necessary that they be re-raised as a different exception type in order to prevent them from being suppressed by the outer property access. Python will not recognize that the AttributeError
originates from the authenticator and will instead assume that the request object does not have a .user
or .auth
property. The authenticator will need to be fixed.
REST framework supports a few browser enhancements such as browser-based PUT
, PATCH
and DELETE
forms.
request.method
returns the uppercased string representation of the request's HTTP method.
Browser-based PUT
, PATCH
and DELETE
forms are transparently supported.
For more information see the browser enhancements documentation.
+request.content_type
, returns a string object representing the media type of the HTTP request's body, or an empty string if no media type was provided.
You won't typically need to directly access the request's content type, as you'll normally rely on REST framework's default request parsing behavior.
+If you do need to access the content type of the request you should use the .content_type
property in preference to using request.META.get('HTTP_CONTENT_TYPE')
, as it provides transparent support for browser-based non-form content.
For more information see the browser enhancements documentation.
+request.stream
returns a stream representing the content of the request body.
You won't typically need to directly access the request's content, as you'll normally rely on REST framework's default request parsing behavior.
+As REST framework's Request
extends Django's HttpRequest
, all the other standard attributes and methods are also available. For example the request.META
and request.session
dictionaries are available as normal.
Note that due to implementation reasons the Request
class does not inherit from HttpRequest
class, but instead extends the class using composition.
++Unlike basic HttpResponse objects, TemplateResponse objects retain the details of the context that was provided by the view to compute the response. The final output of the response is not computed until it is needed, later in the response process.
+ +
REST framework supports HTTP content negotiation by providing a Response
class which allows you to return content that can be rendered into multiple content types, depending on the client request.
The Response
class subclasses Django's SimpleTemplateResponse
. Response
objects are initialised with data, which should consist of native Python primitives. REST framework then uses standard HTTP content negotiation to determine how it should render the final response content.
There's no requirement for you to use the Response
class, you can also return regular HttpResponse
or StreamingHttpResponse
objects from your views if required. Using the Response
class simply provides a nicer interface for returning content-negotiated Web API responses, that can be rendered to multiple formats.
Unless you want to heavily customize REST framework for some reason, you should always use an APIView
class or @api_view
function for views that return Response
objects. Doing so ensures that the view can perform content negotiation and select the appropriate renderer for the response, before it is returned from the view.
Signature: Response(data, status=None, template_name=None, headers=None, content_type=None)
Unlike regular HttpResponse
objects, you do not instantiate Response
objects with rendered content. Instead you pass in unrendered data, which may consist of any Python primitives.
The renderers used by the Response
class cannot natively handle complex datatypes such as Django model instances, so you need to serialize the data into primitive datatypes before creating the Response
object.
You can use REST framework's Serializer
classes to perform this data serialization, or use your own custom serialization.
Arguments:
+data
: The serialized data for the response.status
: A status code for the response. Defaults to 200. See also status codes.template_name
: A template name to use if HTMLRenderer
is selected.headers
: A dictionary of HTTP headers to use in the response.content_type
: The content type of the response. Typically, this will be set automatically by the renderer as determined by content negotiation, but there may be some cases where you need to specify the content type explicitly.The unrendered, serialized data of the response.
+The numeric status code of the HTTP response.
+The rendered content of the response. The .render()
method must have been called before .content
can be accessed.
The template_name
, if supplied. Only required if HTMLRenderer
or some other custom template renderer is the accepted renderer for the response.
The renderer instance that will be used to render the response.
+Set automatically by the APIView
or @api_view
immediately before the response is returned from the view.
The media type that was selected by the content negotiation stage.
+Set automatically by the APIView
or @api_view
immediately before the response is returned from the view.
A dictionary of additional context information that will be passed to the renderer's .render()
method.
Set automatically by the APIView
or @api_view
immediately before the response is returned from the view.
The Response
class extends SimpleTemplateResponse
, and all the usual attributes and methods are also available on the response. For example you can set headers on the response in the standard way:
response = Response()
+response['Cache-Control'] = 'no-cache'
+
+Signature: .render()
As with any other TemplateResponse
, this method is called to render the serialized data of the response into the final response content. When .render()
is called, the response content will be set to the result of calling the .render(data, accepted_media_type, renderer_context)
method on the accepted_renderer
instance.
You won't typically need to call .render()
yourself, as it's handled by Django's standard response cycle.
++The central feature that distinguishes the REST architectural style from other network-based styles is its emphasis on a uniform interface between components.
+— Roy Fielding, Architectural Styles and the Design of Network-based Software Architectures
+
As a rule, it's probably better practice to return absolute URIs from your Web APIs, such as http://example.com/foobar
, rather than returning relative URIs, such as /foobar
.
The advantages of doing so are:
+REST framework provides two utility functions to make it more simple to return absolute URIs from your Web API.
+There's no requirement for you to use them, but if you do then the self-describing API will be able to automatically hyperlink its output for you, which makes browsing the API much easier.
+Signature: reverse(viewname, *args, **kwargs)
Has the same behavior as django.urls.reverse
, except that it returns a fully qualified URL, using the request to determine the host and port.
You should include the request as a keyword argument to the function, for example:
+from rest_framework.reverse import reverse
+from rest_framework.views import APIView
+from django.utils.timezone import now
+
+class APIRootView(APIView):
+ def get(self, request):
+ year = now().year
+ data = {
+ ...
+ 'year-summary-url': reverse('year-summary', args=[year], request=request)
+ }
+ return Response(data)
+
+Signature: reverse_lazy(viewname, *args, **kwargs)
Has the same behavior as django.urls.reverse_lazy
, except that it returns a fully qualified URL, using the request to determine the host and port.
As with the reverse
function, you should include the request as a keyword argument to the function, for example:
api_root = reverse_lazy('api-root', request=request)
+
+
+
+ ++Resource routing allows you to quickly declare all of the common routes for a given resourceful controller. Instead of declaring separate routes for your index... a resourceful route declares them in a single line of code.
+ +
Some Web frameworks such as Rails provide functionality for automatically determining how the URLs for an application should be mapped to the logic that deals with handling incoming requests.
+REST framework adds support for automatic URL routing to Django, and provides you with a simple, quick and consistent way of wiring your view logic to a set of URLs.
+Here's an example of a simple URL conf, that uses SimpleRouter
.
from rest_framework import routers
+
+router = routers.SimpleRouter()
+router.register(r'users', UserViewSet)
+router.register(r'accounts', AccountViewSet)
+urlpatterns = router.urls
+
+There are two mandatory arguments to the register()
method:
prefix
- The URL prefix to use for this set of routes.viewset
- The viewset class.Optionally, you may also specify an additional argument:
+basename
- The base to use for the URL names that are created. If unset the basename will be automatically generated based on the queryset
attribute of the viewset, if it has one. Note that if the viewset does not include a queryset
attribute then you must set basename
when registering the viewset.The example above would generate the following URL patterns:
+^users/$
Name: 'user-list'
^users/{pk}/$
Name: 'user-detail'
^accounts/$
Name: 'account-list'
^accounts/{pk}/$
Name: 'account-detail'
Note: The basename
argument is used to specify the initial part of the view name pattern. In the example above, that's the user
or account
part.
Typically you won't need to specify the basename
argument, but if you have a viewset where you've defined a custom get_queryset
method, then the viewset may not have a .queryset
attribute set. If you try to register that viewset you'll see an error like this:
'basename' argument not specified, and could not automatically determine the name from the viewset, as it does not have a '.queryset' attribute.
+
+This means you'll need to explicitly set the basename
argument when registering the viewset, as it could not be automatically determined from the model name.
include
with routersThe .urls
attribute on a router instance is simply a standard list of URL patterns. There are a number of different styles for how you can include these URLs.
For example, you can append router.urls
to a list of existing views...
router = routers.SimpleRouter()
+router.register(r'users', UserViewSet)
+router.register(r'accounts', AccountViewSet)
+
+urlpatterns = [
+ url(r'^forgot-password/$', ForgotPasswordFormView.as_view()),
+]
+
+urlpatterns += router.urls
+
+Alternatively you can use Django's include
function, like so...
urlpatterns = [
+ url(r'^forgot-password/$', ForgotPasswordFormView.as_view()),
+ url(r'^', include(router.urls)),
+]
+
+You may use include
with an application namespace:
urlpatterns = [
+ url(r'^forgot-password/$', ForgotPasswordFormView.as_view()),
+ url(r'^api/', include((router.urls, 'app_name'))),
+]
+
+Or both an application and instance namespace:
+urlpatterns = [
+ url(r'^forgot-password/$', ForgotPasswordFormView.as_view()),
+ url(r'^api/', include((router.urls, 'app_name'), namespace='instance_name')),
+]
+
+See Django's URL namespaces docs and the include
API reference for more details.
Note: If using namespacing with hyperlinked serializers you'll also need to ensure that any view_name
parameters
+on the serializers correctly reflect the namespace. In the examples above you'd need to include a parameter such as
+view_name='app_name:user-detail'
for serializer fields hyperlinked to the user detail view.
The automatic view_name
generation uses a pattern like %(model_name)-detail
. Unless your models names actually clash
+you may be better off not namespacing your Django REST Framework views when using hyperlinked serializers.
A viewset may mark extra actions for routing by decorating a method with the @action
decorator. These extra actions will be included in the generated routes. For example, given the set_password
method on the UserViewSet
class:
from myapp.permissions import IsAdminOrIsSelf
+from rest_framework.decorators import action
+
+class UserViewSet(ModelViewSet):
+ ...
+
+ @action(methods=['post'], detail=True, permission_classes=[IsAdminOrIsSelf])
+ def set_password(self, request, pk=None):
+ ...
+
+The following route would be generated:
+^users/{pk}/set_password/$
'user-set-password'
By default, the URL pattern is based on the method name, and the URL name is the combination of the ViewSet.basename
and the hyphenated method name.
+If you don't want to use the defaults for either of these values, you can instead provide the url_path
and url_name
arguments to the @action
decorator.
For example, if you want to change the URL for our custom action to ^users/{pk}/change-password/$
, you could write:
from myapp.permissions import IsAdminOrIsSelf
+from rest_framework.decorators import action
+
+class UserViewSet(ModelViewSet):
+ ...
+
+ @action(methods=['post'], detail=True, permission_classes=[IsAdminOrIsSelf],
+ url_path='change-password', url_name='change_password')
+ def set_password(self, request, pk=None):
+ ...
+
+The above example would now generate the following URL pattern:
+^users/{pk}/change-password/$
'user-change_password'
This router includes routes for the standard set of list
, create
, retrieve
, update
, partial_update
and destroy
actions. The viewset can also mark additional methods to be routed, using the @action
decorator.
URL Style | HTTP Method | Action | URL Name |
---|---|---|---|
{prefix}/ | GET | list | {basename}-list |
POST | create | ||
{prefix}/{url_path}/ | GET, or as specified by `methods` argument | `@action(detail=False)` decorated method | {basename}-{url_name} |
{prefix}/{lookup}/ | GET | retrieve | {basename}-detail |
PUT | update | ||
PATCH | partial_update | ||
DELETE | destroy | ||
{prefix}/{lookup}/{url_path}/ | GET, or as specified by `methods` argument | `@action(detail=True)` decorated method | {basename}-{url_name} |
By default the URLs created by SimpleRouter
are appended with a trailing slash.
+This behavior can be modified by setting the trailing_slash
argument to False
when instantiating the router. For example:
router = SimpleRouter(trailing_slash=False)
+
+Trailing slashes are conventional in Django, but are not used by default in some other frameworks such as Rails. Which style you choose to use is largely a matter of preference, although some javascript frameworks may expect a particular routing style.
+The router will match lookup values containing any characters except slashes and period characters. For a more restrictive (or lenient) lookup pattern, set the lookup_value_regex
attribute on the viewset. For example, you can limit the lookup to valid UUIDs:
class MyModelViewSet(mixins.RetrieveModelMixin, viewsets.GenericViewSet):
+ lookup_field = 'my_model_id'
+ lookup_value_regex = '[0-9a-f]{32}'
+
+This router is similar to SimpleRouter
as above, but additionally includes a default API root view, that returns a response containing hyperlinks to all the list views. It also generates routes for optional .json
style format suffixes.
URL Style | HTTP Method | Action | URL Name |
---|---|---|---|
[.format] | GET | automatically generated root view | api-root |
{prefix}/[.format] | GET | list | {basename}-list |
POST | create | ||
{prefix}/{url_path}/[.format] | GET, or as specified by `methods` argument | `@action(detail=False)` decorated method | {basename}-{url_name} |
{prefix}/{lookup}/[.format] | GET | retrieve | {basename}-detail |
PUT | update | ||
PATCH | partial_update | ||
DELETE | destroy | ||
{prefix}/{lookup}/{url_path}/[.format] | GET, or as specified by `methods` argument | `@action(detail=True)` decorated method | {basename}-{url_name} |
As with SimpleRouter
the trailing slashes on the URL routes can be removed by setting the trailing_slash
argument to False
when instantiating the router.
router = DefaultRouter(trailing_slash=False)
+
+Implementing a custom router isn't something you'd need to do very often, but it can be useful if you have specific requirements about how the URLs for your API are structured. Doing so allows you to encapsulate the URL structure in a reusable way that ensures you don't have to write your URL patterns explicitly for each new view.
+The simplest way to implement a custom router is to subclass one of the existing router classes. The .routes
attribute is used to template the URL patterns that will be mapped to each viewset. The .routes
attribute is a list of Route
named tuples.
The arguments to the Route
named tuple are:
url: A string representing the URL to be routed. May include the following format strings:
+{prefix}
- The URL prefix to use for this set of routes.{lookup}
- The lookup field used to match against a single instance.{trailing_slash}
- Either a '/' or an empty string, depending on the trailing_slash
argument.mapping: A mapping of HTTP method names to the view methods
+name: The name of the URL as used in reverse
calls. May include the following format string:
{basename}
- The base to use for the URL names that are created.initkwargs: A dictionary of any additional arguments that should be passed when instantiating the view. Note that the detail
, basename
, and suffix
arguments are reserved for viewset introspection and are also used by the browsable API to generate the view name and breadcrumb links.
You can also customize how the @action
decorator is routed. Include the DynamicRoute
named tuple in the .routes
list, setting the detail
argument as appropriate for the list-based and detail-based routes. In addition to detail
, the arguments to DynamicRoute
are:
url: A string representing the URL to be routed. May include the same format strings as Route
, and additionally accepts the {url_path}
format string.
name: The name of the URL as used in reverse
calls. May include the following format strings:
{basename}
- The base to use for the URL names that are created.{url_name}
- The url_name
provided to the @action
.initkwargs: A dictionary of any additional arguments that should be passed when instantiating the view.
+The following example will only route to the list
and retrieve
actions, and does not use the trailing slash convention.
from rest_framework.routers import Route, DynamicRoute, SimpleRouter
+
+class CustomReadOnlyRouter(SimpleRouter):
+ """
+ A router for read-only APIs, which doesn't use trailing slashes.
+ """
+ routes = [
+ Route(
+ url=r'^{prefix}$',
+ mapping={'get': 'list'},
+ name='{basename}-list',
+ detail=False,
+ initkwargs={'suffix': 'List'}
+ ),
+ Route(
+ url=r'^{prefix}/{lookup}$',
+ mapping={'get': 'retrieve'},
+ name='{basename}-detail',
+ detail=True,
+ initkwargs={'suffix': 'Detail'}
+ ),
+ DynamicRoute(
+ url=r'^{prefix}/{lookup}/{url_path}$',
+ name='{basename}-{url_name}',
+ detail=True,
+ initkwargs={}
+ )
+ ]
+
+Let's take a look at the routes our CustomReadOnlyRouter
would generate for a simple viewset.
views.py
:
class UserViewSet(viewsets.ReadOnlyModelViewSet):
+ """
+ A viewset that provides the standard actions
+ """
+ queryset = User.objects.all()
+ serializer_class = UserSerializer
+ lookup_field = 'username'
+
+ @action(detail=True)
+ def group_names(self, request, pk=None):
+ """
+ Returns a list of all the group names that the given
+ user belongs to.
+ """
+ user = self.get_object()
+ groups = user.groups.all()
+ return Response([group.name for group in groups])
+
+urls.py
:
router = CustomReadOnlyRouter()
+router.register('users', UserViewSet)
+urlpatterns = router.urls
+
+The following mappings would be generated...
+URL | HTTP Method | Action | URL Name |
---|---|---|---|
/users | GET | list | user-list |
/users/{username} | GET | retrieve | user-detail |
/users/{username}/group_names | GET | group_names | user-group-names |
For another example of setting the .routes
attribute, see the source code for the SimpleRouter
class.
If you want to provide totally custom behavior, you can override BaseRouter
and override the get_urls(self)
method. The method should inspect the registered viewsets and return a list of URL patterns. The registered prefix, viewset and basename tuples may be inspected by accessing the self.registry
attribute.
You may also want to override the get_default_basename(self, viewset)
method, or else always explicitly set the basename
argument when registering your viewsets with the router.
The following third party packages are also available.
+The drf-nested-routers package provides routers and relationship fields for working with nested resources.
+The wq.db package provides an advanced ModelRouter class (and singleton instance) that extends DefaultRouter
with a register_model()
API. Much like Django's admin.site.register
, the only required argument to rest.router.register_model
is a model class. Reasonable defaults for a url prefix, serializer, and viewset will be inferred from the model and global configuration.
from wq.db import rest
+from myapp.models import MyModel
+
+rest.router.register_model(MyModel)
+
+The DRF-extensions
package provides routers for creating nested viewsets, collection level controllers with customizable endpoint names.
++A machine-readable [schema] describes what resources are available via the API, what their URLs are, how they are represented and what operations they support.
+— Heroku, [JSON Schema for the Heroku Platform API][cite]
+
API schemas are a useful tool that allow for a range of use cases, including +generating reference documentation, or driving dynamic client libraries that +can interact with your API.
+Django REST Framework provides support for automatic generation of +OpenAPI schemas.
+pyyaml
You'll need to install pyyaml
, so that you can render your generated schema
+into the commonly used YAML-based OpenAPI format.
pip install pyyaml
+
+generateschema
management commandIf your schema is static, you can use the generateschema
management command:
./manage.py generateschema > openapi-schema.yml
+
+
+Once you've generated a schema in this way you can annotate it with any +additional information that cannot be automatically inferred by the schema +generator.
+You might want to check your API schema into version control and update it +with each new release, or serve the API schema from your site's static media.
+SchemaView
If you require a dynamic schema, because foreign key choices depend on database
+values, for example, you can route a SchemaView
that will generate and serve
+your schema on demand.
To route a SchemaView
, use the get_schema_view()
helper.
In urls.py
:
from rest_framework.schemas import get_schema_view
+
+urlpatterns = [
+ # ...
+ # Use the `get_schema_view()` helper to add a `SchemaView` to project URLs.
+ # * `title` and `description` parameters are passed to `SchemaGenerator`.
+ # * Provide view name for use with `reverse()`.
+ path('openapi', get_schema_view(
+ title="Your Project",
+ description="API for all things …",
+ version="1.0.0"
+ ), name='openapi-schema'),
+ # ...
+]
+
+
+get_schema_view()
The get_schema_view()
helper takes the following keyword arguments:
title
: May be used to provide a descriptive title for the schema definition.description
: Longer descriptive text.version
: The version of the API.url
: May be used to pass a canonical base URL for the schema.
schema_view = get_schema_view(
+ title='Server Monitoring API',
+ url='https://www.example.org/api/'
+)
+
+urlconf
: A string representing the import path to the URL conf that you want
+ to generate an API schema for. This defaults to the value of Django's
+ ROOT_URLCONF
setting.
schema_view = get_schema_view(
+ title='Server Monitoring API',
+ url='https://www.example.org/api/',
+ urlconf='myproject.urls'
+)
+
+patterns
: List of url patterns to limit the schema introspection to. If you
+ only want the myproject.api
urls to be exposed in the schema:
schema_url_patterns = [
+ url(r'^api/', include('myproject.api.urls')),
+]
+
+schema_view = get_schema_view(
+ title='Server Monitoring API',
+ url='https://www.example.org/api/',
+ patterns=schema_url_patterns,
+)
+
+generator_class
: May be used to specify a SchemaGenerator
subclass to be
+ passed to the SchemaView
.
authentication_classes
: May be used to specify the list of authentication
+ classes that will apply to the schema endpoint. Defaults to
+ settings.DEFAULT_AUTHENTICATION_CLASSES
permission_classes
: May be used to specify the list of permission classes
+ that will apply to the schema endpoint. Defaults to
+ settings.DEFAULT_PERMISSION_CLASSES
.renderer_classes
: May be used to pass the set of renderer classes that can
+ be used to render the API root endpoint.You may customize schema generation at the level of the schema as a whole, or +on a per-view basis.
+In order to customize the top-level schema sublass
+rest_framework.schemas.openapi.SchemaGenerator
and provide it as an argument
+to the generateschema
command or get_schema_view()
helper function.
A class that walks a list of routed URL patterns, requests the schema for each +view and collates the resulting OpenAPI schema.
+Typically you'll instantiate SchemaGenerator
with a title
argument, like so:
generator = SchemaGenerator(title='Stock Prices API')
+
+Arguments:
+title
required: The name of the API.description
: Longer descriptive text.version
: The version of the API. Defaults to 0.1.0
.url
: The root URL of the API schema. This option is not required unless the schema is included under path prefix.patterns
: A list of URLs to inspect when generating the schema. Defaults to the project's URL conf.urlconf
: A URL conf module name to use when generating the schema. Defaults to settings.ROOT_URLCONF
.Returns a dictionary that represents the OpenAPI schema:
+generator = SchemaGenerator(title='Stock Prices API')
+schema = generator.get_schema()
+
+The request
argument is optional, and may be used if you want to apply
+per-user permissions to the resulting schema generation.
This is a good point to override if you want to customize the generated +dictionary, for example to add custom +specification extensions.
+By default, view introspection is performed by an AutoSchema
instance
+accessible via the schema
attribute on APIView
. This provides the
+appropriate Open API operation object for the view,
+request method and path:
auto_schema = view.schema
+operation = auto_schema.get_operation(...)
+
+In compiling the schema, SchemaGenerator
calls view.schema.get_operation()
+for each view, allowed method, and path.
Note: For basic APIView
subclasses, default introspection is essentially
+limited to the URL kwarg path parameters. For GenericAPIView
+subclasses, which includes all the provided class based views, AutoSchema
will
+attempt to introspect serializer, pagination and filter fields, as well as
+provide richer path field descriptions. (The key hooks here are the relevant
+GenericAPIView
attributes and methods: get_serializer
, pagination_class
,
+filter_backends
and so on.)
In order to customize the operation generation, you should provide an AutoSchema
subclass, overriding get_operation()
as you need:
from rest_framework.views import APIView
+ from rest_framework.schemas.openapi import AutoSchema
+
+ class CustomSchema(AutoSchema):
+ def get_operation(...):
+ # Implement custom introspection here (or in other sub-methods)
+
+ class CustomView(APIView):
+ """APIView subclass with custom schema introspection."""
+ schema = CustomSchema()
+
+This provides complete control over view introspection.
+You may disable schema generation for a view by setting schema
to None
:
class CustomView(APIView):
+ ...
+ schema = None # Will not appear in schema
+
+This also applies to extra actions for ViewSet
s:
class CustomViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
+
+ @action(detail=True, schema=None)
+ def extra_action(self, request, pk=None):
+ ...
+
+If you wish to provide a base AutoSchema
subclass to be used throughout your
+project you may adjust settings.DEFAULT_SCHEMA_CLASS
appropriately.
++Expanding the usefulness of the serializers is something that we would +like to address. However, it's not a trivial problem, and it +will take some serious design work.
+— Russell Keith-Magee, Django users group
+
Serializers allow complex data such as querysets and model instances to be converted to native Python datatypes that can then be easily rendered into JSON
, XML
or other content types. Serializers also provide deserialization, allowing parsed data to be converted back into complex types, after first validating the incoming data.
The serializers in REST framework work very similarly to Django's Form
and ModelForm
classes. We provide a Serializer
class which gives you a powerful, generic way to control the output of your responses, as well as a ModelSerializer
class which provides a useful shortcut for creating serializers that deal with model instances and querysets.
Let's start by creating a simple object we can use for example purposes:
+from datetime import datetime
+
+class Comment(object):
+ def __init__(self, email, content, created=None):
+ self.email = email
+ self.content = content
+ self.created = created or datetime.now()
+
+comment = Comment(email='leila@example.com', content='foo bar')
+
+We'll declare a serializer that we can use to serialize and deserialize data that corresponds to Comment
objects.
Declaring a serializer looks very similar to declaring a form:
+from rest_framework import serializers
+
+class CommentSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
+ email = serializers.EmailField()
+ content = serializers.CharField(max_length=200)
+ created = serializers.DateTimeField()
+
+We can now use CommentSerializer
to serialize a comment, or list of comments. Again, using the Serializer
class looks a lot like using a Form
class.
serializer = CommentSerializer(comment)
+serializer.data
+# {'email': 'leila@example.com', 'content': 'foo bar', 'created': '2016-01-27T15:17:10.375877'}
+
+At this point we've translated the model instance into Python native datatypes. To finalise the serialization process we render the data into json
.
from rest_framework.renderers import JSONRenderer
+
+json = JSONRenderer().render(serializer.data)
+json
+# b'{"email":"leila@example.com","content":"foo bar","created":"2016-01-27T15:17:10.375877"}'
+
+Deserialization is similar. First we parse a stream into Python native datatypes...
+import io
+from rest_framework.parsers import JSONParser
+
+stream = io.BytesIO(json)
+data = JSONParser().parse(stream)
+
+...then we restore those native datatypes into a dictionary of validated data.
+serializer = CommentSerializer(data=data)
+serializer.is_valid()
+# True
+serializer.validated_data
+# {'content': 'foo bar', 'email': 'leila@example.com', 'created': datetime.datetime(2012, 08, 22, 16, 20, 09, 822243)}
+
+If we want to be able to return complete object instances based on the validated data we need to implement one or both of the .create()
and .update()
methods. For example:
class CommentSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
+ email = serializers.EmailField()
+ content = serializers.CharField(max_length=200)
+ created = serializers.DateTimeField()
+
+ def create(self, validated_data):
+ return Comment(**validated_data)
+
+ def update(self, instance, validated_data):
+ instance.email = validated_data.get('email', instance.email)
+ instance.content = validated_data.get('content', instance.content)
+ instance.created = validated_data.get('created', instance.created)
+ return instance
+
+If your object instances correspond to Django models you'll also want to ensure that these methods save the object to the database. For example, if Comment
was a Django model, the methods might look like this:
def create(self, validated_data):
+ return Comment.objects.create(**validated_data)
+
+ def update(self, instance, validated_data):
+ instance.email = validated_data.get('email', instance.email)
+ instance.content = validated_data.get('content', instance.content)
+ instance.created = validated_data.get('created', instance.created)
+ instance.save()
+ return instance
+
+Now when deserializing data, we can call .save()
to return an object instance, based on the validated data.
comment = serializer.save()
+
+Calling .save()
will either create a new instance, or update an existing instance, depending on if an existing instance was passed when instantiating the serializer class:
# .save() will create a new instance.
+serializer = CommentSerializer(data=data)
+
+# .save() will update the existing `comment` instance.
+serializer = CommentSerializer(comment, data=data)
+
+Both the .create()
and .update()
methods are optional. You can implement either neither, one, or both of them, depending on the use-case for your serializer class.
.save()
Sometimes you'll want your view code to be able to inject additional data at the point of saving the instance. This additional data might include information like the current user, the current time, or anything else that is not part of the request data.
+You can do so by including additional keyword arguments when calling .save()
. For example:
serializer.save(owner=request.user)
+
+Any additional keyword arguments will be included in the validated_data
argument when .create()
or .update()
are called.
.save()
directly.In some cases the .create()
and .update()
method names may not be meaningful. For example, in a contact form we may not be creating new instances, but instead sending an email or other message.
In these cases you might instead choose to override .save()
directly, as being more readable and meaningful.
For example:
+class ContactForm(serializers.Serializer):
+ email = serializers.EmailField()
+ message = serializers.CharField()
+
+ def save(self):
+ email = self.validated_data['email']
+ message = self.validated_data['message']
+ send_email(from=email, message=message)
+
+Note that in the case above we're now having to access the serializer .validated_data
property directly.
When deserializing data, you always need to call is_valid()
before attempting to access the validated data, or save an object instance. If any validation errors occur, the .errors
property will contain a dictionary representing the resulting error messages. For example:
serializer = CommentSerializer(data={'email': 'foobar', 'content': 'baz'})
+serializer.is_valid()
+# False
+serializer.errors
+# {'email': ['Enter a valid e-mail address.'], 'created': ['This field is required.']}
+
+Each key in the dictionary will be the field name, and the values will be lists of strings of any error messages corresponding to that field. The non_field_errors
key may also be present, and will list any general validation errors. The name of the non_field_errors
key may be customized using the NON_FIELD_ERRORS_KEY
REST framework setting.
When deserializing a list of items, errors will be returned as a list of dictionaries representing each of the deserialized items.
+The .is_valid()
method takes an optional raise_exception
flag that will cause it to raise a serializers.ValidationError
exception if there are validation errors.
These exceptions are automatically dealt with by the default exception handler that REST framework provides, and will return HTTP 400 Bad Request
responses by default.
# Return a 400 response if the data was invalid.
+serializer.is_valid(raise_exception=True)
+
+You can specify custom field-level validation by adding .validate_<field_name>
methods to your Serializer
subclass. These are similar to the .clean_<field_name>
methods on Django forms.
These methods take a single argument, which is the field value that requires validation.
+Your validate_<field_name>
methods should return the validated value or raise a serializers.ValidationError
. For example:
from rest_framework import serializers
+
+class BlogPostSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
+ title = serializers.CharField(max_length=100)
+ content = serializers.CharField()
+
+ def validate_title(self, value):
+ """
+ Check that the blog post is about Django.
+ """
+ if 'django' not in value.lower():
+ raise serializers.ValidationError("Blog post is not about Django")
+ return value
+
+Note: If your <field_name>
is declared on your serializer with the parameter required=False
then this validation step will not take place if the field is not included.
To do any other validation that requires access to multiple fields, add a method called .validate()
to your Serializer
subclass. This method takes a single argument, which is a dictionary of field values. It should raise a serializers.ValidationError
if necessary, or just return the validated values. For example:
from rest_framework import serializers
+
+class EventSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
+ description = serializers.CharField(max_length=100)
+ start = serializers.DateTimeField()
+ finish = serializers.DateTimeField()
+
+ def validate(self, data):
+ """
+ Check that start is before finish.
+ """
+ if data['start'] > data['finish']:
+ raise serializers.ValidationError("finish must occur after start")
+ return data
+
+Individual fields on a serializer can include validators, by declaring them on the field instance, for example:
+def multiple_of_ten(value):
+ if value % 10 != 0:
+ raise serializers.ValidationError('Not a multiple of ten')
+
+class GameRecord(serializers.Serializer):
+ score = IntegerField(validators=[multiple_of_ten])
+ ...
+
+Serializer classes can also include reusable validators that are applied to the complete set of field data. These validators are included by declaring them on an inner Meta
class, like so:
class EventSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
+ name = serializers.CharField()
+ room_number = serializers.IntegerField(choices=[101, 102, 103, 201])
+ date = serializers.DateField()
+
+ class Meta:
+ # Each room only has one event per day.
+ validators = UniqueTogetherValidator(
+ queryset=Event.objects.all(),
+ fields=['room_number', 'date']
+ )
+
+For more information see the validators documentation.
+When passing an initial object or queryset to a serializer instance, the object will be made available as .instance
. If no initial object is passed then the .instance
attribute will be None
.
When passing data to a serializer instance, the unmodified data will be made available as .initial_data
. If the data keyword argument is not passed then the .initial_data
attribute will not exist.
By default, serializers must be passed values for all required fields or they will raise validation errors. You can use the partial
argument in order to allow partial updates.
# Update `comment` with partial data
+serializer = CommentSerializer(comment, data={'content': 'foo bar'}, partial=True)
+
+The previous examples are fine for dealing with objects that only have simple datatypes, but sometimes we also need to be able to represent more complex objects, where some of the attributes of an object might not be simple datatypes such as strings, dates or integers.
+The Serializer
class is itself a type of Field
, and can be used to represent relationships where one object type is nested inside another.
class UserSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
+ email = serializers.EmailField()
+ username = serializers.CharField(max_length=100)
+
+class CommentSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
+ user = UserSerializer()
+ content = serializers.CharField(max_length=200)
+ created = serializers.DateTimeField()
+
+If a nested representation may optionally accept the None
value you should pass the required=False
flag to the nested serializer.
class CommentSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
+ user = UserSerializer(required=False) # May be an anonymous user.
+ content = serializers.CharField(max_length=200)
+ created = serializers.DateTimeField()
+
+Similarly if a nested representation should be a list of items, you should pass the many=True
flag to the nested serialized.
class CommentSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
+ user = UserSerializer(required=False)
+ edits = EditItemSerializer(many=True) # A nested list of 'edit' items.
+ content = serializers.CharField(max_length=200)
+ created = serializers.DateTimeField()
+
+When dealing with nested representations that support deserializing the data, any errors with nested objects will be nested under the field name of the nested object.
+serializer = CommentSerializer(data={'user': {'email': 'foobar', 'username': 'doe'}, 'content': 'baz'})
+serializer.is_valid()
+# False
+serializer.errors
+# {'user': {'email': ['Enter a valid e-mail address.']}, 'created': ['This field is required.']}
+
+Similarly, the .validated_data
property will include nested data structures.
.create()
methods for nested representationsIf you're supporting writable nested representations you'll need to write .create()
or .update()
methods that handle saving multiple objects.
The following example demonstrates how you might handle creating a user with a nested profile object.
+class UserSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+ profile = ProfileSerializer()
+
+ class Meta:
+ model = User
+ fields = ['username', 'email', 'profile']
+
+ def create(self, validated_data):
+ profile_data = validated_data.pop('profile')
+ user = User.objects.create(**validated_data)
+ Profile.objects.create(user=user, **profile_data)
+ return user
+
+.update()
methods for nested representationsFor updates you'll want to think carefully about how to handle updates to relationships. For example if the data for the relationship is None
, or not provided, which of the following should occur?
NULL
in the database.Here's an example for an .update()
method on our previous UserSerializer
class.
def update(self, instance, validated_data):
+ profile_data = validated_data.pop('profile')
+ # Unless the application properly enforces that this field is
+ # always set, the follow could raise a `DoesNotExist`, which
+ # would need to be handled.
+ profile = instance.profile
+
+ instance.username = validated_data.get('username', instance.username)
+ instance.email = validated_data.get('email', instance.email)
+ instance.save()
+
+ profile.is_premium_member = profile_data.get(
+ 'is_premium_member',
+ profile.is_premium_member
+ )
+ profile.has_support_contract = profile_data.get(
+ 'has_support_contract',
+ profile.has_support_contract
+ )
+ profile.save()
+
+ return instance
+
+Because the behavior of nested creates and updates can be ambiguous, and may require complex dependencies between related models, REST framework 3 requires you to always write these methods explicitly. The default ModelSerializer
.create()
and .update()
methods do not include support for writable nested representations.
There are however, third-party packages available such as DRF Writable Nested that support automatic writable nested representations.
+An alternative to saving multiple related instances in the serializer is to write custom model manager classes that handle creating the correct instances.
+For example, suppose we wanted to ensure that User
instances and Profile
instances are always created together as a pair. We might write a custom manager class that looks something like this:
class UserManager(models.Manager):
+ ...
+
+ def create(self, username, email, is_premium_member=False, has_support_contract=False):
+ user = User(username=username, email=email)
+ user.save()
+ profile = Profile(
+ user=user,
+ is_premium_member=is_premium_member,
+ has_support_contract=has_support_contract
+ )
+ profile.save()
+ return user
+
+This manager class now more nicely encapsulates that user instances and profile instances are always created at the same time. Our .create()
method on the serializer class can now be re-written to use the new manager method.
def create(self, validated_data):
+ return User.objects.create(
+ username=validated_data['username'],
+ email=validated_data['email']
+ is_premium_member=validated_data['profile']['is_premium_member']
+ has_support_contract=validated_data['profile']['has_support_contract']
+ )
+
+For more details on this approach see the Django documentation on model managers, and this blogpost on using model and manager classes.
+The Serializer
class can also handle serializing or deserializing lists of objects.
To serialize a queryset or list of objects instead of a single object instance, you should pass the many=True
flag when instantiating the serializer. You can then pass a queryset or list of objects to be serialized.
queryset = Book.objects.all()
+serializer = BookSerializer(queryset, many=True)
+serializer.data
+# [
+# {'id': 0, 'title': 'The electric kool-aid acid test', 'author': 'Tom Wolfe'},
+# {'id': 1, 'title': 'If this is a man', 'author': 'Primo Levi'},
+# {'id': 2, 'title': 'The wind-up bird chronicle', 'author': 'Haruki Murakami'}
+# ]
+
+The default behavior for deserializing multiple objects is to support multiple object creation, but not support multiple object updates. For more information on how to support or customize either of these cases, see the ListSerializer documentation below.
+There are some cases where you need to provide extra context to the serializer in addition to the object being serialized. One common case is if you're using a serializer that includes hyperlinked relations, which requires the serializer to have access to the current request so that it can properly generate fully qualified URLs.
+You can provide arbitrary additional context by passing a context
argument when instantiating the serializer. For example:
serializer = AccountSerializer(account, context={'request': request})
+serializer.data
+# {'id': 6, 'owner': 'denvercoder9', 'created': datetime.datetime(2013, 2, 12, 09, 44, 56, 678870), 'details': 'http://example.com/accounts/6/details'}
+
+The context dictionary can be used within any serializer field logic, such as a custom .to_representation()
method, by accessing the self.context
attribute.
Often you'll want serializer classes that map closely to Django model definitions.
+The ModelSerializer
class provides a shortcut that lets you automatically create a Serializer
class with fields that correspond to the Model fields.
The ModelSerializer
class is the same as a regular Serializer
class, except that:
.create()
and .update()
.Declaring a ModelSerializer
looks like this:
class AccountSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+ class Meta:
+ model = Account
+ fields = ['id', 'account_name', 'users', 'created']
+
+By default, all the model fields on the class will be mapped to a corresponding serializer fields.
+Any relationships such as foreign keys on the model will be mapped to PrimaryKeyRelatedField
. Reverse relationships are not included by default unless explicitly included as specified in the serializer relations documentation.
ModelSerializer
Serializer classes generate helpful verbose representation strings, that allow you to fully inspect the state of their fields. This is particularly useful when working with ModelSerializers
where you want to determine what set of fields and validators are being automatically created for you.
To do so, open the Django shell, using python manage.py shell
, then import the serializer class, instantiate it, and print the object representation…
>>> from myapp.serializers import AccountSerializer
+>>> serializer = AccountSerializer()
+>>> print(repr(serializer))
+AccountSerializer():
+ id = IntegerField(label='ID', read_only=True)
+ name = CharField(allow_blank=True, max_length=100, required=False)
+ owner = PrimaryKeyRelatedField(queryset=User.objects.all())
+
+If you only want a subset of the default fields to be used in a model serializer, you can do so using fields
or exclude
options, just as you would with a ModelForm
. It is strongly recommended that you explicitly set all fields that should be serialized using the fields
attribute. This will make it less likely to result in unintentionally exposing data when your models change.
For example:
+class AccountSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+ class Meta:
+ model = Account
+ fields = ['id', 'account_name', 'users', 'created']
+
+You can also set the fields
attribute to the special value '__all__'
to indicate that all fields in the model should be used.
For example:
+class AccountSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+ class Meta:
+ model = Account
+ fields = '__all__'
+
+You can set the exclude
attribute to a list of fields to be excluded from the serializer.
For example:
+class AccountSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+ class Meta:
+ model = Account
+ exclude = ['users']
+
+In the example above, if the Account
model had 3 fields account_name
, users
, and created
, this will result in the fields account_name
and created
to be serialized.
The names in the fields
and exclude
attributes will normally map to model fields on the model class.
Alternatively names in the fields
options can map to properties or methods which take no arguments that exist on the model class.
Since version 3.3.0, it is mandatory to provide one of the attributes fields
or exclude
.
The default ModelSerializer
uses primary keys for relationships, but you can also easily generate nested representations using the depth
option:
class AccountSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+ class Meta:
+ model = Account
+ fields = ['id', 'account_name', 'users', 'created']
+ depth = 1
+
+The depth
option should be set to an integer value that indicates the depth of relationships that should be traversed before reverting to a flat representation.
If you want to customize the way the serialization is done you'll need to define the field yourself.
+You can add extra fields to a ModelSerializer
or override the default fields by declaring fields on the class, just as you would for a Serializer
class.
class AccountSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+ url = serializers.CharField(source='get_absolute_url', read_only=True)
+ groups = serializers.PrimaryKeyRelatedField(many=True)
+
+ class Meta:
+ model = Account
+
+Extra fields can correspond to any property or callable on the model.
+You may wish to specify multiple fields as read-only. Instead of adding each field explicitly with the read_only=True
attribute, you may use the shortcut Meta option, read_only_fields
.
This option should be a list or tuple of field names, and is declared as follows:
+class AccountSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+ class Meta:
+ model = Account
+ fields = ['id', 'account_name', 'users', 'created']
+ read_only_fields = ['account_name']
+
+Model fields which have editable=False
set, and AutoField
fields will be set to read-only by default, and do not need to be added to the read_only_fields
option.
Note: There is a special-case where a read-only field is part of a unique_together
constraint at the model level. In this case the field is required by the serializer class in order to validate the constraint, but should also not be editable by the user.
The right way to deal with this is to specify the field explicitly on the serializer, providing both the read_only=True
and default=…
keyword arguments.
One example of this is a read-only relation to the currently authenticated User
which is unique_together
with another identifier. In this case you would declare the user field like so:
user = serializers.PrimaryKeyRelatedField(read_only=True, default=serializers.CurrentUserDefault())
+
+Please review the Validators Documentation for details on the UniqueTogetherValidator and CurrentUserDefault classes.
+There is also a shortcut allowing you to specify arbitrary additional keyword arguments on fields, using the extra_kwargs
option. As in the case of read_only_fields
, this means you do not need to explicitly declare the field on the serializer.
This option is a dictionary, mapping field names to a dictionary of keyword arguments. For example:
+class CreateUserSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+ class Meta:
+ model = User
+ fields = ['email', 'username', 'password']
+ extra_kwargs = {'password': {'write_only': True}}
+
+ def create(self, validated_data):
+ user = User(
+ email=validated_data['email'],
+ username=validated_data['username']
+ )
+ user.set_password(validated_data['password'])
+ user.save()
+ return user
+
+Please keep in mind that, if the field has already been explicitly declared on the serializer class, then the extra_kwargs
option will be ignored.
When serializing model instances, there are a number of different ways you might choose to represent relationships. The default representation for ModelSerializer
is to use the primary keys of the related instances.
Alternative representations include serializing using hyperlinks, serializing complete nested representations, or serializing with a custom representation.
+For full details see the serializer relations documentation.
+The ModelSerializer class also exposes an API that you can override in order to alter how serializer fields are automatically determined when instantiating the serializer.
+Normally if a ModelSerializer
does not generate the fields you need by default then you should either add them to the class explicitly, or simply use a regular Serializer
class instead. However in some cases you may want to create a new base class that defines how the serializer fields are created for any given model.
.serializer_field_mapping
A mapping of Django model classes to REST framework serializer classes. You can override this mapping to alter the default serializer classes that should be used for each model class.
+.serializer_related_field
This property should be the serializer field class, that is used for relational fields by default.
+For ModelSerializer
this defaults to PrimaryKeyRelatedField
.
For HyperlinkedModelSerializer
this defaults to serializers.HyperlinkedRelatedField
.
serializer_url_field
The serializer field class that should be used for any url
field on the serializer.
Defaults to serializers.HyperlinkedIdentityField
serializer_choice_field
The serializer field class that should be used for any choice fields on the serializer.
+Defaults to serializers.ChoiceField
The following methods are called to determine the class and keyword arguments for each field that should be automatically included on the serializer. Each of these methods should return a two tuple of (field_class, field_kwargs)
.
.build_standard_field(self, field_name, model_field)
Called to generate a serializer field that maps to a standard model field.
+The default implementation returns a serializer class based on the serializer_field_mapping
attribute.
.build_relational_field(self, field_name, relation_info)
Called to generate a serializer field that maps to a relational model field.
+The default implementation returns a serializer class based on the serializer_related_field
attribute.
The relation_info
argument is a named tuple, that contains model_field
, related_model
, to_many
and has_through_model
properties.
.build_nested_field(self, field_name, relation_info, nested_depth)
Called to generate a serializer field that maps to a relational model field, when the depth
option has been set.
The default implementation dynamically creates a nested serializer class based on either ModelSerializer
or HyperlinkedModelSerializer
.
The nested_depth
will be the value of the depth
option, minus one.
The relation_info
argument is a named tuple, that contains model_field
, related_model
, to_many
and has_through_model
properties.
.build_property_field(self, field_name, model_class)
Called to generate a serializer field that maps to a property or zero-argument method on the model class.
+The default implementation returns a ReadOnlyField
class.
.build_url_field(self, field_name, model_class)
Called to generate a serializer field for the serializer's own url
field. The default implementation returns a HyperlinkedIdentityField
class.
.build_unknown_field(self, field_name, model_class)
Called when the field name did not map to any model field or model property. +The default implementation raises an error, although subclasses may customize this behavior.
+The HyperlinkedModelSerializer
class is similar to the ModelSerializer
class except that it uses hyperlinks to represent relationships, rather than primary keys.
By default the serializer will include a url
field instead of a primary key field.
The url field will be represented using a HyperlinkedIdentityField
serializer field, and any relationships on the model will be represented using a HyperlinkedRelatedField
serializer field.
You can explicitly include the primary key by adding it to the fields
option, for example:
class AccountSerializer(serializers.HyperlinkedModelSerializer):
+ class Meta:
+ model = Account
+ fields = ['url', 'id', 'account_name', 'users', 'created']
+
+When instantiating a HyperlinkedModelSerializer
you must include the current
+request
in the serializer context, for example:
serializer = AccountSerializer(queryset, context={'request': request})
+
+Doing so will ensure that the hyperlinks can include an appropriate hostname, +so that the resulting representation uses fully qualified URLs, such as:
+http://api.example.com/accounts/1/
+
+Rather than relative URLs, such as:
+/accounts/1/
+
+If you do want to use relative URLs, you should explicitly pass {'request': None}
+in the serializer context.
There needs to be a way of determining which views should be used for hyperlinking to model instances.
+By default hyperlinks are expected to correspond to a view name that matches the style '{model_name}-detail'
, and looks up the instance by a pk
keyword argument.
You can override a URL field view name and lookup field by using either, or both of, the view_name
and lookup_field
options in the extra_kwargs
setting, like so:
class AccountSerializer(serializers.HyperlinkedModelSerializer):
+ class Meta:
+ model = Account
+ fields = ['account_url', 'account_name', 'users', 'created']
+ extra_kwargs = {
+ 'url': {'view_name': 'accounts', 'lookup_field': 'account_name'},
+ 'users': {'lookup_field': 'username'}
+ }
+
+Alternatively you can set the fields on the serializer explicitly. For example:
+class AccountSerializer(serializers.HyperlinkedModelSerializer):
+ url = serializers.HyperlinkedIdentityField(
+ view_name='accounts',
+ lookup_field='slug'
+ )
+ users = serializers.HyperlinkedRelatedField(
+ view_name='user-detail',
+ lookup_field='username',
+ many=True,
+ read_only=True
+ )
+
+ class Meta:
+ model = Account
+ fields = ['url', 'account_name', 'users', 'created']
+
+Tip: Properly matching together hyperlinked representations and your URL conf can sometimes be a bit fiddly. Printing the repr
of a HyperlinkedModelSerializer
instance is a particularly useful way to inspect exactly which view names and lookup fields the relationships are expected to map too.
The name of the URL field defaults to 'url'. You can override this globally, by using the URL_FIELD_NAME
setting.
The ListSerializer
class provides the behavior for serializing and validating multiple objects at once. You won't typically need to use ListSerializer
directly, but should instead simply pass many=True
when instantiating a serializer.
When a serializer is instantiated and many=True
is passed, a ListSerializer
instance will be created. The serializer class then becomes a child of the parent ListSerializer
The following argument can also be passed to a ListSerializer
field or a serializer that is passed many=True
:
allow_empty
This is True
by default, but can be set to False
if you want to disallow empty lists as valid input.
ListSerializer
behaviorThere are a few use cases when you might want to customize the ListSerializer
behavior. For example:
For these cases you can modify the class that is used when many=True
is passed, by using the list_serializer_class
option on the serializer Meta
class.
For example:
+class CustomListSerializer(serializers.ListSerializer):
+ ...
+
+class CustomSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
+ ...
+ class Meta:
+ list_serializer_class = CustomListSerializer
+
+The default implementation for multiple object creation is to simply call .create()
for each item in the list. If you want to customize this behavior, you'll need to customize the .create()
method on ListSerializer
class that is used when many=True
is passed.
For example:
+class BookListSerializer(serializers.ListSerializer):
+ def create(self, validated_data):
+ books = [Book(**item) for item in validated_data]
+ return Book.objects.bulk_create(books)
+
+class BookSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
+ ...
+ class Meta:
+ list_serializer_class = BookListSerializer
+
+By default the ListSerializer
class does not support multiple updates. This is because the behavior that should be expected for insertions and deletions is ambiguous.
To support multiple updates you'll need to do so explicitly. When writing your multiple update code make sure to keep the following in mind:
+You will need to add an explicit id
field to the instance serializer. The default implicitly-generated id
field is marked as read_only
. This causes it to be removed on updates. Once you declare it explicitly, it will be available in the list serializer's update
method.
Here's an example of how you might choose to implement multiple updates:
+class BookListSerializer(serializers.ListSerializer):
+ def update(self, instance, validated_data):
+ # Maps for id->instance and id->data item.
+ book_mapping = {book.id: book for book in instance}
+ data_mapping = {item['id']: item for item in validated_data}
+
+ # Perform creations and updates.
+ ret = []
+ for book_id, data in data_mapping.items():
+ book = book_mapping.get(book_id, None)
+ if book is None:
+ ret.append(self.child.create(data))
+ else:
+ ret.append(self.child.update(book, data))
+
+ # Perform deletions.
+ for book_id, book in book_mapping.items():
+ if book_id not in data_mapping:
+ book.delete()
+
+ return ret
+
+class BookSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
+ # We need to identify elements in the list using their primary key,
+ # so use a writable field here, rather than the default which would be read-only.
+ id = serializers.IntegerField()
+ ...
+
+ class Meta:
+ list_serializer_class = BookListSerializer
+
+It is possible that a third party package may be included alongside the 3.1 release that provides some automatic support for multiple update operations, similar to the allow_add_remove
behavior that was present in REST framework 2.
When a serializer with many=True
is instantiated, we need to determine which arguments and keyword arguments should be passed to the .__init__()
method for both the child Serializer
class, and for the parent ListSerializer
class.
The default implementation is to pass all arguments to both classes, except for validators
, and any custom keyword arguments, both of which are assumed to be intended for the child serializer class.
Occasionally you might need to explicitly specify how the child and parent classes should be instantiated when many=True
is passed. You can do so by using the many_init
class method.
@classmethod
+ def many_init(cls, *args, **kwargs):
+ # Instantiate the child serializer.
+ kwargs['child'] = cls()
+ # Instantiate the parent list serializer.
+ return CustomListSerializer(*args, **kwargs)
+
+BaseSerializer
class that can be used to easily support alternative serialization and deserialization styles.
This class implements the same basic API as the Serializer
class:
.data
- Returns the outgoing primitive representation..is_valid()
- Deserializes and validates incoming data..validated_data
- Returns the validated incoming data..errors
- Returns any errors during validation..save()
- Persists the validated data into an object instance.There are four methods that can be overridden, depending on what functionality you want the serializer class to support:
+.to_representation()
- Override this to support serialization, for read operations..to_internal_value()
- Override this to support deserialization, for write operations..create()
and .update()
- Override either or both of these to support saving instances.Because this class provides the same interface as the Serializer
class, you can use it with the existing generic class-based views exactly as you would for a regular Serializer
or ModelSerializer
.
The only difference you'll notice when doing so is the BaseSerializer
classes will not generate HTML forms in the browsable API. This is because the data they return does not include all the field information that would allow each field to be rendered into a suitable HTML input.
BaseSerializer
classesTo implement a read-only serializer using the BaseSerializer
class, we just need to override the .to_representation()
method. Let's take a look at an example using a simple Django model:
class HighScore(models.Model):
+ created = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True)
+ player_name = models.CharField(max_length=10)
+ score = models.IntegerField()
+
+It's simple to create a read-only serializer for converting HighScore
instances into primitive data types.
class HighScoreSerializer(serializers.BaseSerializer):
+ def to_representation(self, instance):
+ return {
+ 'score': instance.score,
+ 'player_name': instance.player_name
+ }
+
+We can now use this class to serialize single HighScore
instances:
@api_view(['GET'])
+def high_score(request, pk):
+ instance = HighScore.objects.get(pk=pk)
+ serializer = HighScoreSerializer(instance)
+ return Response(serializer.data)
+
+Or use it to serialize multiple instances:
+@api_view(['GET'])
+def all_high_scores(request):
+ queryset = HighScore.objects.order_by('-score')
+ serializer = HighScoreSerializer(queryset, many=True)
+ return Response(serializer.data)
+
+BaseSerializer
classesTo create a read-write serializer we first need to implement a .to_internal_value()
method. This method returns the validated values that will be used to construct the object instance, and may raise a serializers.ValidationError
if the supplied data is in an incorrect format.
Once you've implemented .to_internal_value()
, the basic validation API will be available on the serializer, and you will be able to use .is_valid()
, .validated_data
and .errors
.
If you want to also support .save()
you'll need to also implement either or both of the .create()
and .update()
methods.
Here's a complete example of our previous HighScoreSerializer
, that's been updated to support both read and write operations.
class HighScoreSerializer(serializers.BaseSerializer):
+ def to_internal_value(self, data):
+ score = data.get('score')
+ player_name = data.get('player_name')
+
+ # Perform the data validation.
+ if not score:
+ raise serializers.ValidationError({
+ 'score': 'This field is required.'
+ })
+ if not player_name:
+ raise serializers.ValidationError({
+ 'player_name': 'This field is required.'
+ })
+ if len(player_name) > 10:
+ raise serializers.ValidationError({
+ 'player_name': 'May not be more than 10 characters.'
+ })
+
+ # Return the validated values. This will be available as
+ # the `.validated_data` property.
+ return {
+ 'score': int(score),
+ 'player_name': player_name
+ }
+
+ def to_representation(self, instance):
+ return {
+ 'score': instance.score,
+ 'player_name': instance.player_name
+ }
+
+ def create(self, validated_data):
+ return HighScore.objects.create(**validated_data)
+
+The BaseSerializer
class is also useful if you want to implement new generic serializer classes for dealing with particular serialization styles, or for integrating with alternative storage backends.
The following class is an example of a generic serializer that can handle coercing arbitrary objects into primitive representations.
+class ObjectSerializer(serializers.BaseSerializer):
+ """
+ A read-only serializer that coerces arbitrary complex objects
+ into primitive representations.
+ """
+ def to_representation(self, instance):
+ output = {}
+ for attribute_name in dir(instance):
+ attribute = getattr(instance, attribute_name)
+ if attribute_name.startswith('_'):
+ # Ignore private attributes.
+ pass
+ elif hasattr(attribute, '__call__'):
+ # Ignore methods and other callables.
+ pass
+ elif isinstance(attribute, (str, int, bool, float, type(None))):
+ # Primitive types can be passed through unmodified.
+ output[attribute_name] = attribute
+ elif isinstance(attribute, list):
+ # Recursively deal with items in lists.
+ output[attribute_name] = [
+ self.to_representation(item) for item in attribute
+ ]
+ elif isinstance(attribute, dict):
+ # Recursively deal with items in dictionaries.
+ output[attribute_name] = {
+ str(key): self.to_representation(value)
+ for key, value in attribute.items()
+ }
+ else:
+ # Force anything else to its string representation.
+ output[attribute_name] = str(attribute)
+ return output
+
+If you need to alter the serialization or deserialization behavior of a serializer class, you can do so by overriding the .to_representation()
or .to_internal_value()
methods.
Some reasons this might be useful include...
+The signatures for these methods are as follows:
+.to_representation(self, instance)
Takes the object instance that requires serialization, and should return a primitive representation. Typically this means returning a structure of built-in Python datatypes. The exact types that can be handled will depend on the render classes you have configured for your API.
+May be overridden in order to modify the representation style. For example:
+def to_representation(self, instance):
+ """Convert `username` to lowercase."""
+ ret = super().to_representation(instance)
+ ret['username'] = ret['username'].lower()
+ return ret
+
+.to_internal_value(self, data)
Takes the unvalidated incoming data as input and should return the validated data that will be made available as serializer.validated_data
. The return value will also be passed to the .create()
or .update()
methods if .save()
is called on the serializer class.
If any of the validation fails, then the method should raise a serializers.ValidationError(errors)
. The errors
argument should be a dictionary mapping field names (or settings.NON_FIELD_ERRORS_KEY
) to a list of error messages. If you don't need to alter deserialization behavior and instead want to provide object-level validation, it's recommended that you instead override the .validate()
method.
The data
argument passed to this method will normally be the value of request.data
, so the datatype it provides will depend on the parser classes you have configured for your API.
Similar to Django forms, you can extend and reuse serializers through inheritance. This allows you to declare a common set of fields or methods on a parent class that can then be used in a number of serializers. For example,
+class MyBaseSerializer(Serializer):
+ my_field = serializers.CharField()
+
+ def validate_my_field(self, value):
+ ...
+
+class MySerializer(MyBaseSerializer):
+ ...
+
+Like Django's Model
and ModelForm
classes, the inner Meta
class on serializers does not implicitly inherit from it's parents' inner Meta
classes. If you want the Meta
class to inherit from a parent class you must do so explicitly. For example:
class AccountSerializer(MyBaseSerializer):
+ class Meta(MyBaseSerializer.Meta):
+ model = Account
+
+Typically we would recommend not using inheritance on inner Meta classes, but instead declaring all options explicitly.
+Additionally, the following caveats apply to serializer inheritance:
+Meta
inner class, only the first one will be used. This means the child’s Meta
, if it exists, otherwise the Meta
of the first parent, etc.It’s possible to declaratively remove a Field
inherited from a parent class by setting the name to be None
on the subclass.
class MyBaseSerializer(ModelSerializer):
+ my_field = serializers.CharField()
+
+class MySerializer(MyBaseSerializer):
+ my_field = None
+
+However, you can only use this technique to opt out from a field defined declaratively by a parent class; it won’t prevent the ModelSerializer
from generating a default field. To opt-out from default fields, see Specifying which fields to include.
Once a serializer has been initialized, the dictionary of fields that are set on the serializer may be accessed using the .fields
attribute. Accessing and modifying this attribute allows you to dynamically modify the serializer.
Modifying the fields
argument directly allows you to do interesting things such as changing the arguments on serializer fields at runtime, rather than at the point of declaring the serializer.
For example, if you wanted to be able to set which fields should be used by a serializer at the point of initializing it, you could create a serializer class like so:
+class DynamicFieldsModelSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+ """
+ A ModelSerializer that takes an additional `fields` argument that
+ controls which fields should be displayed.
+ """
+
+ def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
+ # Don't pass the 'fields' arg up to the superclass
+ fields = kwargs.pop('fields', None)
+
+ # Instantiate the superclass normally
+ super(DynamicFieldsModelSerializer, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
+
+ if fields is not None:
+ # Drop any fields that are not specified in the `fields` argument.
+ allowed = set(fields)
+ existing = set(self.fields)
+ for field_name in existing - allowed:
+ self.fields.pop(field_name)
+
+This would then allow you to do the following:
+>>> class UserSerializer(DynamicFieldsModelSerializer):
+>>> class Meta:
+>>> model = User
+>>> fields = ['id', 'username', 'email']
+>>>
+>>> print(UserSerializer(user))
+{'id': 2, 'username': 'jonwatts', 'email': 'jon@example.com'}
+>>>
+>>> print(UserSerializer(user, fields=('id', 'email')))
+{'id': 2, 'email': 'jon@example.com'}
+
+REST framework 2 provided an API to allow developers to override how a ModelSerializer
class would automatically generate the default set of fields.
This API included the .get_field()
, .get_pk_field()
and other methods.
Because the serializers have been fundamentally redesigned with 3.0 this API no longer exists. You can still modify the fields that get created but you'll need to refer to the source code, and be aware that if the changes you make are against private bits of API then they may be subject to change.
+The following third party packages are also available.
+The django-rest-marshmallow package provides an alternative implementation for serializers, using the python marshmallow library. It exposes the same API as the REST framework serializers, and can be used as a drop-in replacement in some use-cases.
+The serpy package is an alternative implementation for serializers that is built for speed. Serpy serializes complex datatypes to simple native types. The native types can be easily converted to JSON or any other format needed.
+The django-rest-framework-mongoengine package provides a MongoEngineModelSerializer
serializer class that supports using MongoDB as the storage layer for Django REST framework.
The django-rest-framework-gis package provides a GeoFeatureModelSerializer
serializer class that supports GeoJSON both for read and write operations.
The django-rest-framework-hstore package provides an HStoreSerializer
to support django-hstore DictionaryField
model field and its schema-mode
feature.
The dynamic-rest package extends the ModelSerializer and ModelViewSet interfaces, adding API query parameters for filtering, sorting, and including / excluding all fields and relationships defined by your serializers.
+The drf-dynamic-fields package provides a mixin to dynamically limit the fields per serializer to a subset specified by an URL parameter.
+The drf-flex-fields package extends the ModelSerializer and ModelViewSet to provide commonly used functionality for dynamically setting fields and expanding primitive fields to nested models, both from URL parameters and your serializer class definitions.
+The django-rest-framework-serializer-extensions +package provides a collection of tools to DRY up your serializers, by allowing +fields to be defined on a per-view/request basis. Fields can be whitelisted, +blacklisted and child serializers can be optionally expanded.
+The html-json-forms package provides an algorithm and serializer for processing <form>
submissions per the (inactive) HTML JSON Form specification. The serializer facilitates processing of arbitrarily nested JSON structures within HTML. For example, <input name="items[0][id]" value="5">
will be interpreted as {"items": [{"id": "5"}]}
.
DRF-Base64 provides a set of field and model serializers that handles the upload of base64-encoded files.
+djangorestframework-queryfields allows API clients to specify which fields will be sent in the response via inclusion/exclusion query parameters.
+The drf-writable-nested package provides writable nested model serializer which allows to create/update models with nested related data.
+ + +++Namespaces are one honking great idea - let's do more of those!
+ +
Configuration for REST framework is all namespaced inside a single Django setting, named REST_FRAMEWORK
.
For example your project's settings.py
file might include something like this:
REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ 'DEFAULT_RENDERER_CLASSES': [
+ 'rest_framework.renderers.JSONRenderer',
+ ],
+ 'DEFAULT_PARSER_CLASSES': [
+ 'rest_framework.parsers.JSONParser',
+ ]
+}
+
+If you need to access the values of REST framework's API settings in your project,
+you should use the api_settings
object. For example.
from rest_framework.settings import api_settings
+
+print(api_settings.DEFAULT_AUTHENTICATION_CLASSES)
+
+The api_settings
object will check for any user-defined settings, and otherwise fall back to the default values. Any setting that uses string import paths to refer to a class will automatically import and return the referenced class, instead of the string literal.
The following settings control the basic API policies, and are applied to every APIView
class-based view, or @api_view
function based view.
A list or tuple of renderer classes, that determines the default set of renderers that may be used when returning a Response
object.
Default:
+[
+ 'rest_framework.renderers.JSONRenderer',
+ 'rest_framework.renderers.BrowsableAPIRenderer',
+]
+
+A list or tuple of parser classes, that determines the default set of parsers used when accessing the request.data
property.
Default:
+[
+ 'rest_framework.parsers.JSONParser',
+ 'rest_framework.parsers.FormParser',
+ 'rest_framework.parsers.MultiPartParser'
+]
+
+A list or tuple of authentication classes, that determines the default set of authenticators used when accessing the request.user
or request.auth
properties.
Default:
+[
+ 'rest_framework.authentication.SessionAuthentication',
+ 'rest_framework.authentication.BasicAuthentication'
+]
+
+A list or tuple of permission classes, that determines the default set of permissions checked at the start of a view. Permission must be granted by every class in the list.
+Default:
+[
+ 'rest_framework.permissions.AllowAny',
+]
+
+A list or tuple of throttle classes, that determines the default set of throttles checked at the start of a view.
+Default: []
A content negotiation class, that determines how a renderer is selected for the response, given an incoming request.
+Default: 'rest_framework.negotiation.DefaultContentNegotiation'
A view inspector class that will be used for schema generation.
+Default: 'rest_framework.schemas.openapi.AutoSchema'
The following settings control the behavior of the generic class-based views.
+A list of filter backend classes that should be used for generic filtering.
+If set to None
then generic filtering is disabled.
The default class to use for queryset pagination. If set to None
, pagination
+is disabled by default. See the pagination documentation for further guidance on
+setting and
+modifying the pagination style.
Default: None
The default page size to use for pagination. If set to None
, pagination is disabled by default.
Default: None
The name of a query parameter, which can be used to specify the search term used by SearchFilter
.
Default: search
The name of a query parameter, which can be used to specify the ordering of results returned by OrderingFilter
.
Default: ordering
The value that should be used for request.version
when no versioning information is present.
Default: None
If set, this value will restrict the set of versions that may be returned by the versioning scheme, and will raise an error if the provided version if not in this set.
+Default: None
The string that should used for any versioning parameters, such as in the media type or URL query parameters.
+Default: 'version'
The following settings control the behavior of unauthenticated requests.
+The class that should be used to initialize request.user
for unauthenticated requests.
+(If removing authentication entirely, e.g. by removing django.contrib.auth
from
+INSTALLED_APPS
, set UNAUTHENTICATED_USER
to None
.)
Default: django.contrib.auth.models.AnonymousUser
The class that should be used to initialize request.auth
for unauthenticated requests.
Default: None
The following settings control the behavior of APIRequestFactory and APIClient
+The default format that should be used when making test requests.
+This should match up with the format of one of the renderer classes in the TEST_REQUEST_RENDERER_CLASSES
setting.
Default: 'multipart'
The renderer classes that are supported when building test requests.
+The format of any of these renderer classes may be used when constructing a test request, for example: client.post('/users', {'username': 'jamie'}, format='json')
Default:
+[
+ 'rest_framework.renderers.MultiPartRenderer',
+ 'rest_framework.renderers.JSONRenderer'
+]
+
+If set, this maps the 'pk'
identifier in the URL conf onto the actual field
+name when generating a schema path parameter. Typically this will be 'id'
.
+This gives a more suitable representation as "primary key" is an implementation
+detail, whereas "identifier" is a more general concept.
Default: True
If set, this is used to map internal viewset method names onto external action +names used in the schema generation. This allows us to generate names that +are more suitable for an external representation than those that are used +internally in the codebase.
+Default: {'retrieve': 'read', 'destroy': 'delete'}
The name of a URL parameter that may be used to override the default content negotiation Accept
header behavior, by using a format=…
query parameter in the request URL.
For example: http://example.com/organizations/?format=csv
If the value of this setting is None
then URL format overrides will be disabled.
Default: 'format'
The name of a parameter in the URL conf that may be used to provide a format suffix. This setting is applied when using format_suffix_patterns
to include suffixed URL patterns.
For example: http://example.com/organizations.csv/
Default: 'format'
The following settings are used to control how date and time representations may be parsed and rendered.
+A format string that should be used by default for rendering the output of DateTimeField
serializer fields. If None
, then DateTimeField
serializer fields will return Python datetime
objects, and the datetime encoding will be determined by the renderer.
May be any of None
, 'iso-8601'
or a Python strftime format string.
Default: 'iso-8601'
A list of format strings that should be used by default for parsing inputs to DateTimeField
serializer fields.
May be a list including the string 'iso-8601'
or Python strftime format strings.
Default: ['iso-8601']
A format string that should be used by default for rendering the output of DateField
serializer fields. If None
, then DateField
serializer fields will return Python date
objects, and the date encoding will be determined by the renderer.
May be any of None
, 'iso-8601'
or a Python strftime format string.
Default: 'iso-8601'
A list of format strings that should be used by default for parsing inputs to DateField
serializer fields.
May be a list including the string 'iso-8601'
or Python strftime format strings.
Default: ['iso-8601']
A format string that should be used by default for rendering the output of TimeField
serializer fields. If None
, then TimeField
serializer fields will return Python time
objects, and the time encoding will be determined by the renderer.
May be any of None
, 'iso-8601'
or a Python strftime format string.
Default: 'iso-8601'
A list of format strings that should be used by default for parsing inputs to TimeField
serializer fields.
May be a list including the string 'iso-8601'
or Python strftime format strings.
Default: ['iso-8601']
When set to True
, JSON responses will allow unicode characters in responses. For example:
{"unicode black star":"★"}
+
+When set to False
, JSON responses will escape non-ascii characters, like so:
{"unicode black star":"\u2605"}
+
+Both styles conform to RFC 4627, and are syntactically valid JSON. The unicode style is preferred as being more user-friendly when inspecting API responses.
+Default: True
When set to True
, JSON responses will return compact representations, with no spacing after ':'
and ','
characters. For example:
{"is_admin":false,"email":"jane@example"}
+
+When set to False
, JSON responses will return slightly more verbose representations, like so:
{"is_admin": false, "email": "jane@example"}
+
+The default style is to return minified responses, in line with Heroku's API design guidelines.
+Default: True
When set to True
, JSON rendering and parsing will only observe syntactically valid JSON, raising an exception for the extended float values (nan
, inf
, -inf
) accepted by Python's json
module. This is the recommended setting, as these values are not generally supported. e.g., neither Javascript's JSON.Parse
nor PostgreSQL's JSON data type accept these values.
When set to False
, JSON rendering and parsing will be permissive. However, these values are still invalid and will need to be specially handled in your code.
Default: True
When returning decimal objects in API representations that do not support a native decimal type, it is normally best to return the value as a string. This avoids the loss of precision that occurs with binary floating point implementations.
+When set to True
, the serializer DecimalField
class will return strings instead of Decimal
objects. When set to False
, serializers will return Decimal
objects, which the default JSON encoder will return as floats.
Default: True
The following settings are used to generate the view names and descriptions, as used in responses to OPTIONS
requests, and as used in the browsable API.
A string representing the function that should be used when generating view names.
+This should be a function with the following signature:
+view_name(self)
+
+self
: The view instance. Typically the name function would inspect the name of the class when generating a descriptive name, by accessing self.__class__.__name__
.If the view instance inherits ViewSet
, it may have been initialized with several optional arguments:
name
: A name explicitly provided to a view in the viewset. Typically, this value should be used as-is when provided.suffix
: Text used when differentiating individual views in a viewset. This argument is mutually exclusive to name
.detail
: Boolean that differentiates an individual view in a viewset as either being a 'list' or 'detail' view.Default: 'rest_framework.views.get_view_name'
A string representing the function that should be used when generating view descriptions.
+This setting can be changed to support markup styles other than the default markdown. For example, you can use it to support rst
markup in your view docstrings being output in the browsable API.
This should be a function with the following signature:
+view_description(self, html=False)
+
+self
: The view instance. Typically the description function would inspect the docstring of the class when generating a description, by accessing self.__class__.__doc__
html
: A boolean indicating if HTML output is required. True
when used in the browsable API, and False
when used in generating OPTIONS
responses.If the view instance inherits ViewSet
, it may have been initialized with several optional arguments:
description
: A description explicitly provided to the view in the viewset. Typically, this is set by extra viewset action
s, and should be used as-is.Default: 'rest_framework.views.get_view_description'
Global settings for select field cutoffs for rendering relational fields in the browsable API.
+Global setting for the html_cutoff
value. Must be an integer.
Default: 1000
+A string representing a global setting for html_cutoff_text
.
Default: "More than {count} items..."
A string representing the function that should be used when returning a response for any given exception. If the function returns None
, a 500 error will be raised.
This setting can be changed to support error responses other than the default {"detail": "Failure..."}
responses. For example, you can use it to provide API responses like {"errors": [{"message": "Failure...", "code": ""} ...]}
.
This should be a function with the following signature:
+exception_handler(exc, context)
+
+exc
: The exception.Default: 'rest_framework.views.exception_handler'
A string representing the key that should be used for serializer errors that do not refer to a specific field, but are instead general errors.
+Default: 'non_field_errors'
A string representing the key that should be used for the URL fields generated by HyperlinkedModelSerializer
.
Default: 'url'
An integer of 0 or more, that may be used to specify the number of application proxies that the API runs behind. This allows throttling to more accurately identify client IP addresses. If set to None
then less strict IP matching will be used by the throttle classes.
Default: None
++418 I'm a teapot - Any attempt to brew coffee with a teapot should result in the error code "418 I'm a teapot". The resulting entity body MAY be short and stout.
+— RFC 2324, Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol
+
Using bare status codes in your responses isn't recommended. REST framework includes a set of named constants that you can use to make your code more obvious and readable.
+from rest_framework import status
+from rest_framework.response import Response
+
+def empty_view(self):
+ content = {'please move along': 'nothing to see here'}
+ return Response(content, status=status.HTTP_404_NOT_FOUND)
+
+The full set of HTTP status codes included in the status
module is listed below.
The module also includes a set of helper functions for testing if a status code is in a given range.
+from rest_framework import status
+from rest_framework.test import APITestCase
+
+class ExampleTestCase(APITestCase):
+ def test_url_root(self):
+ url = reverse('index')
+ response = self.client.get(url)
+ self.assertTrue(status.is_success(response.status_code))
+
+For more information on proper usage of HTTP status codes see RFC 2616 +and RFC 6585.
+This class of status code indicates a provisional response. There are no 1xx status codes used in REST framework by default.
+HTTP_100_CONTINUE
+HTTP_101_SWITCHING_PROTOCOLS
+
+This class of status code indicates that the client's request was successfully received, understood, and accepted.
+HTTP_200_OK
+HTTP_201_CREATED
+HTTP_202_ACCEPTED
+HTTP_203_NON_AUTHORITATIVE_INFORMATION
+HTTP_204_NO_CONTENT
+HTTP_205_RESET_CONTENT
+HTTP_206_PARTIAL_CONTENT
+HTTP_207_MULTI_STATUS
+HTTP_208_ALREADY_REPORTED
+HTTP_226_IM_USED
+
+This class of status code indicates that further action needs to be taken by the user agent in order to fulfill the request.
+HTTP_300_MULTIPLE_CHOICES
+HTTP_301_MOVED_PERMANENTLY
+HTTP_302_FOUND
+HTTP_303_SEE_OTHER
+HTTP_304_NOT_MODIFIED
+HTTP_305_USE_PROXY
+HTTP_306_RESERVED
+HTTP_307_TEMPORARY_REDIRECT
+HTTP_308_PERMANENT_REDIRECT
+
+The 4xx class of status code is intended for cases in which the client seems to have erred. Except when responding to a HEAD request, the server SHOULD include an entity containing an explanation of the error situation, and whether it is a temporary or permanent condition.
+HTTP_400_BAD_REQUEST
+HTTP_401_UNAUTHORIZED
+HTTP_402_PAYMENT_REQUIRED
+HTTP_403_FORBIDDEN
+HTTP_404_NOT_FOUND
+HTTP_405_METHOD_NOT_ALLOWED
+HTTP_406_NOT_ACCEPTABLE
+HTTP_407_PROXY_AUTHENTICATION_REQUIRED
+HTTP_408_REQUEST_TIMEOUT
+HTTP_409_CONFLICT
+HTTP_410_GONE
+HTTP_411_LENGTH_REQUIRED
+HTTP_412_PRECONDITION_FAILED
+HTTP_413_REQUEST_ENTITY_TOO_LARGE
+HTTP_414_REQUEST_URI_TOO_LONG
+HTTP_415_UNSUPPORTED_MEDIA_TYPE
+HTTP_416_REQUESTED_RANGE_NOT_SATISFIABLE
+HTTP_417_EXPECTATION_FAILED
+HTTP_422_UNPROCESSABLE_ENTITY
+HTTP_423_LOCKED
+HTTP_424_FAILED_DEPENDENCY
+HTTP_426_UPGRADE_REQUIRED
+HTTP_428_PRECONDITION_REQUIRED
+HTTP_429_TOO_MANY_REQUESTS
+HTTP_431_REQUEST_HEADER_FIELDS_TOO_LARGE
+HTTP_451_UNAVAILABLE_FOR_LEGAL_REASONS
+
+Response status codes beginning with the digit "5" indicate cases in which the server is aware that it has erred or is incapable of performing the request. Except when responding to a HEAD request, the server SHOULD include an entity containing an explanation of the error situation, and whether it is a temporary or permanent condition.
+HTTP_500_INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR
+HTTP_501_NOT_IMPLEMENTED
+HTTP_502_BAD_GATEWAY
+HTTP_503_SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE
+HTTP_504_GATEWAY_TIMEOUT
+HTTP_505_HTTP_VERSION_NOT_SUPPORTED
+HTTP_506_VARIANT_ALSO_NEGOTIATES
+HTTP_507_INSUFFICIENT_STORAGE
+HTTP_508_LOOP_DETECTED
+HTTP_509_BANDWIDTH_LIMIT_EXCEEDED
+HTTP_510_NOT_EXTENDED
+HTTP_511_NETWORK_AUTHENTICATION_REQUIRED
+
+The following helper functions are available for identifying the category of the response code.
+is_informational() # 1xx
+is_success() # 2xx
+is_redirect() # 3xx
+is_client_error() # 4xx
+is_server_error() # 5xx
+
+
+
+ ++Code without tests is broken as designed.
+ +
REST framework includes a few helper classes that extend Django's existing test framework, and improve support for making API requests.
+Extends Django's existing RequestFactory
class.
The APIRequestFactory
class supports an almost identical API to Django's standard RequestFactory
class. This means that the standard .get()
, .post()
, .put()
, .patch()
, .delete()
, .head()
and .options()
methods are all available.
from rest_framework.test import APIRequestFactory
+
+# Using the standard RequestFactory API to create a form POST request
+factory = APIRequestFactory()
+request = factory.post('/notes/', {'title': 'new idea'})
+
+format
argumentMethods which create a request body, such as post
, put
and patch
, include a format
argument, which make it easy to generate requests using a content type other than multipart form data. For example:
# Create a JSON POST request
+factory = APIRequestFactory()
+request = factory.post('/notes/', {'title': 'new idea'}, format='json')
+
+By default the available formats are 'multipart'
and 'json'
. For compatibility with Django's existing RequestFactory
the default format is 'multipart'
.
To support a wider set of request formats, or change the default format, see the configuration section.
+If you need to explicitly encode the request body, you can do so by setting the content_type
flag. For example:
request = factory.post('/notes/', json.dumps({'title': 'new idea'}), content_type='application/json')
+
+One difference worth noting between Django's RequestFactory
and REST framework's APIRequestFactory
is that multipart form data will be encoded for methods other than just .post()
.
For example, using APIRequestFactory
, you can make a form PUT request like so:
factory = APIRequestFactory()
+request = factory.put('/notes/547/', {'title': 'remember to email dave'})
+
+Using Django's RequestFactory
, you'd need to explicitly encode the data yourself:
from django.test.client import encode_multipart, RequestFactory
+
+factory = RequestFactory()
+data = {'title': 'remember to email dave'}
+content = encode_multipart('BoUnDaRyStRiNg', data)
+content_type = 'multipart/form-data; boundary=BoUnDaRyStRiNg'
+request = factory.put('/notes/547/', content, content_type=content_type)
+
+When testing views directly using a request factory, it's often convenient to be able to directly authenticate the request, rather than having to construct the correct authentication credentials.
+To forcibly authenticate a request, use the force_authenticate()
method.
from rest_framework.test import force_authenticate
+
+factory = APIRequestFactory()
+user = User.objects.get(username='olivia')
+view = AccountDetail.as_view()
+
+# Make an authenticated request to the view...
+request = factory.get('/accounts/django-superstars/')
+force_authenticate(request, user=user)
+response = view(request)
+
+The signature for the method is force_authenticate(request, user=None, token=None)
. When making the call, either or both of the user and token may be set.
For example, when forcibly authenticating using a token, you might do something like the following:
+user = User.objects.get(username='olivia')
+request = factory.get('/accounts/django-superstars/')
+force_authenticate(request, user=user, token=user.auth_token)
+
+Note: force_authenticate
directly sets request.user
to the in-memory user
instance. If you are re-using the same user
instance across multiple tests that update the saved user
state, you may need to call refresh_from_db()
between tests.
Note: When using APIRequestFactory
, the object that is returned is Django's standard HttpRequest
, and not REST framework's Request
object, which is only generated once the view is called.
This means that setting attributes directly on the request object may not always have the effect you expect. For example, setting .token
directly will have no effect, and setting .user
directly will only work if session authentication is being used.
# Request will only authenticate if `SessionAuthentication` is in use.
+request = factory.get('/accounts/django-superstars/')
+request.user = user
+response = view(request)
+
+By default, requests created with APIRequestFactory
will not have CSRF validation applied when passed to a REST framework view. If you need to explicitly turn CSRF validation on, you can do so by setting the enforce_csrf_checks
flag when instantiating the factory.
factory = APIRequestFactory(enforce_csrf_checks=True)
+
+Note: It's worth noting that Django's standard RequestFactory
doesn't need to include this option, because when using regular Django the CSRF validation takes place in middleware, which is not run when testing views directly. When using REST framework, CSRF validation takes place inside the view, so the request factory needs to disable view-level CSRF checks.
Extends Django's existing Client
class.
The APIClient
class supports the same request interface as Django's standard Client
class. This means that the standard .get()
, .post()
, .put()
, .patch()
, .delete()
, .head()
and .options()
methods are all available. For example:
from rest_framework.test import APIClient
+
+client = APIClient()
+client.post('/notes/', {'title': 'new idea'}, format='json')
+
+To support a wider set of request formats, or change the default format, see the configuration section.
+The login
method functions exactly as it does with Django's regular Client
class. This allows you to authenticate requests against any views which include SessionAuthentication
.
# Make all requests in the context of a logged in session.
+client = APIClient()
+client.login(username='lauren', password='secret')
+
+To logout, call the logout
method as usual.
# Log out
+client.logout()
+
+The login
method is appropriate for testing APIs that use session authentication, for example web sites which include AJAX interaction with the API.
The credentials
method can be used to set headers that will then be included on all subsequent requests by the test client.
from rest_framework.authtoken.models import Token
+from rest_framework.test import APIClient
+
+# Include an appropriate `Authorization:` header on all requests.
+token = Token.objects.get(user__username='lauren')
+client = APIClient()
+client.credentials(HTTP_AUTHORIZATION='Token ' + token.key)
+
+Note that calling credentials
a second time overwrites any existing credentials. You can unset any existing credentials by calling the method with no arguments.
# Stop including any credentials
+client.credentials()
+
+The credentials
method is appropriate for testing APIs that require authentication headers, such as basic authentication, OAuth1a and OAuth2 authentication, and simple token authentication schemes.
Sometimes you may want to bypass authentication entirely and force all requests by the test client to be automatically treated as authenticated.
+This can be a useful shortcut if you're testing the API but don't want to have to construct valid authentication credentials in order to make test requests.
+user = User.objects.get(username='lauren')
+client = APIClient()
+client.force_authenticate(user=user)
+
+To unauthenticate subsequent requests, call force_authenticate
setting the user and/or token to None
.
client.force_authenticate(user=None)
+
+By default CSRF validation is not applied when using APIClient
. If you need to explicitly enable CSRF validation, you can do so by setting the enforce_csrf_checks
flag when instantiating the client.
client = APIClient(enforce_csrf_checks=True)
+
+As usual CSRF validation will only apply to any session authenticated views. This means CSRF validation will only occur if the client has been logged in by calling login()
.
REST framework also includes a client for interacting with your application
+using the popular Python library, requests
. This may be useful if:
This exposes exactly the same interface as if you were using a requests session +directly.
+from rest_framework.test import RequestsClient
+
+client = RequestsClient()
+response = client.get('http://testserver/users/')
+assert response.status_code == 200
+
+Note that the requests client requires you to pass fully qualified URLs.
+The RequestsClient
class is useful if you want to write tests that solely interact with the service interface. This is a little stricter than using the standard Django test client, as it means that all interactions should be via the API.
If you're using RequestsClient
you'll want to ensure that test setup, and results assertions are performed as regular API calls, rather than interacting with the database models directly. For example, rather than checking that Customer.objects.count() == 3
you would list the customers endpoint, and ensure that it contains three records.
Custom headers and authentication credentials can be provided in the same way
+as when using a standard requests.Session
instance.
from requests.auth import HTTPBasicAuth
+
+client.auth = HTTPBasicAuth('user', 'pass')
+client.headers.update({'x-test': 'true'})
+
+If you're using SessionAuthentication
then you'll need to include a CSRF token
+for any POST
, PUT
, PATCH
or DELETE
requests.
You can do so by following the same flow that a JavaScript based client would use.
+First make a GET
request in order to obtain a CRSF token, then present that
+token in the following request.
For example...
+client = RequestsClient()
+
+# Obtain a CSRF token.
+response = client.get('http://testserver/homepage/')
+assert response.status_code == 200
+csrftoken = response.cookies['csrftoken']
+
+# Interact with the API.
+response = client.post('http://testserver/organisations/', json={
+ 'name': 'MegaCorp',
+ 'status': 'active'
+}, headers={'X-CSRFToken': csrftoken})
+assert response.status_code == 200
+
+With careful usage both the RequestsClient
and the CoreAPIClient
provide
+the ability to write test cases that can run either in development, or be run
+directly against your staging server or production environment.
Using this style to create basic tests of a few core piece of functionality is +a powerful way to validate your live service. Doing so may require some careful +attention to setup and teardown to ensure that the tests run in a way that they +do not directly affect customer data.
+The CoreAPIClient allows you to interact with your API using the Python
+coreapi
client library.
# Fetch the API schema
+client = CoreAPIClient()
+schema = client.get('http://testserver/schema/')
+
+# Create a new organisation
+params = {'name': 'MegaCorp', 'status': 'active'}
+client.action(schema, ['organisations', 'create'], params)
+
+# Ensure that the organisation exists in the listing
+data = client.action(schema, ['organisations', 'list'])
+assert(len(data) == 1)
+assert(data == [{'name': 'MegaCorp', 'status': 'active'}])
+
+Custom headers and authentication may be used with CoreAPIClient
in a
+similar way as with RequestsClient
.
from requests.auth import HTTPBasicAuth
+
+client = CoreAPIClient()
+client.session.auth = HTTPBasicAuth('user', 'pass')
+client.session.headers.update({'x-test': 'true'})
+
+REST framework includes the following test case classes, that mirror the existing Django test case classes, but use APIClient
instead of Django's default Client
.
APISimpleTestCase
APITransactionTestCase
APITestCase
APILiveServerTestCase
You can use any of REST framework's test case classes as you would for the regular Django test case classes. The self.client
attribute will be an APIClient
instance.
from django.urls import reverse
+from rest_framework import status
+from rest_framework.test import APITestCase
+from myproject.apps.core.models import Account
+
+class AccountTests(APITestCase):
+ def test_create_account(self):
+ """
+ Ensure we can create a new account object.
+ """
+ url = reverse('account-list')
+ data = {'name': 'DabApps'}
+ response = self.client.post(url, data, format='json')
+ self.assertEqual(response.status_code, status.HTTP_201_CREATED)
+ self.assertEqual(Account.objects.count(), 1)
+ self.assertEqual(Account.objects.get().name, 'DabApps')
+
+REST framework also provides a test case class for isolating urlpatterns
on a per-class basis. Note that this inherits from Django's SimpleTestCase
, and will most likely need to be mixed with another test case class.
from django.urls import include, path, reverse
+from rest_framework.test import APITestCase, URLPatternsTestCase
+
+
+class AccountTests(APITestCase, URLPatternsTestCase):
+ urlpatterns = [
+ path('api/', include('api.urls')),
+ ]
+
+ def test_create_account(self):
+ """
+ Ensure we can create a new account object.
+ """
+ url = reverse('account-list')
+ response = self.client.get(url, format='json')
+ self.assertEqual(response.status_code, status.HTTP_200_OK)
+ self.assertEqual(len(response.data), 1)
+
+When checking the validity of test responses it's often more convenient to inspect the data that the response was created with, rather than inspecting the fully rendered response.
+For example, it's easier to inspect response.data
:
response = self.client.get('/users/4/')
+self.assertEqual(response.data, {'id': 4, 'username': 'lauren'})
+
+Instead of inspecting the result of parsing response.content
:
response = self.client.get('/users/4/')
+self.assertEqual(json.loads(response.content), {'id': 4, 'username': 'lauren'})
+
+If you're testing views directly using APIRequestFactory
, the responses that are returned will not yet be rendered, as rendering of template responses is performed by Django's internal request-response cycle. In order to access response.content
, you'll first need to render the response.
view = UserDetail.as_view()
+request = factory.get('/users/4')
+response = view(request, pk='4')
+response.render() # Cannot access `response.content` without this.
+self.assertEqual(response.content, '{"username": "lauren", "id": 4}')
+
+The default format used to make test requests may be set using the TEST_REQUEST_DEFAULT_FORMAT
setting key. For example, to always use JSON for test requests by default instead of standard multipart form requests, set the following in your settings.py
file:
REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ ...
+ 'TEST_REQUEST_DEFAULT_FORMAT': 'json'
+}
+
+If you need to test requests using something other than multipart or json requests, you can do so by setting the TEST_REQUEST_RENDERER_CLASSES
setting.
For example, to add support for using format='html'
in test requests, you might have something like this in your settings.py
file.
REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ ...
+ 'TEST_REQUEST_RENDERER_CLASSES': [
+ 'rest_framework.renderers.MultiPartRenderer',
+ 'rest_framework.renderers.JSONRenderer',
+ 'rest_framework.renderers.TemplateHTMLRenderer'
+ ]
+}
+
+
+
+ ++HTTP/1.1 420 Enhance Your Calm
+ +
Throttling is similar to permissions, in that it determines if a request should be authorized. Throttles indicate a temporary state, and are used to control the rate of requests that clients can make to an API.
+As with permissions, multiple throttles may be used. Your API might have a restrictive throttle for unauthenticated requests, and a less restrictive throttle for authenticated requests.
+Another scenario where you might want to use multiple throttles would be if you need to impose different constraints on different parts of the API, due to some services being particularly resource-intensive.
+Multiple throttles can also be used if you want to impose both burst throttling rates, and sustained throttling rates. For example, you might want to limit a user to a maximum of 60 requests per minute, and 1000 requests per day.
+Throttles do not necessarily only refer to rate-limiting requests. For example a storage service might also need to throttle against bandwidth, and a paid data service might want to throttle against a certain number of a records being accessed.
+As with permissions and authentication, throttling in REST framework is always defined as a list of classes.
+Before running the main body of the view each throttle in the list is checked.
+If any throttle check fails an exceptions.Throttled
exception will be raised, and the main body of the view will not run.
The default throttling policy may be set globally, using the DEFAULT_THROTTLE_CLASSES
and DEFAULT_THROTTLE_RATES
settings. For example.
REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ 'DEFAULT_THROTTLE_CLASSES': [
+ 'rest_framework.throttling.AnonRateThrottle',
+ 'rest_framework.throttling.UserRateThrottle'
+ ],
+ 'DEFAULT_THROTTLE_RATES': {
+ 'anon': '100/day',
+ 'user': '1000/day'
+ }
+}
+
+The rate descriptions used in DEFAULT_THROTTLE_RATES
may include second
, minute
, hour
or day
as the throttle period.
You can also set the throttling policy on a per-view or per-viewset basis,
+using the APIView
class-based views.
from rest_framework.response import Response
+from rest_framework.throttling import UserRateThrottle
+from rest_framework.views import APIView
+
+class ExampleView(APIView):
+ throttle_classes = [UserRateThrottle]
+
+ def get(self, request, format=None):
+ content = {
+ 'status': 'request was permitted'
+ }
+ return Response(content)
+
+Or, if you're using the @api_view
decorator with function based views.
@api_view(['GET'])
+@throttle_classes([UserRateThrottle])
+def example_view(request, format=None):
+ content = {
+ 'status': 'request was permitted'
+ }
+ return Response(content)
+
+The X-Forwarded-For
HTTP header and REMOTE_ADDR
WSGI variable are used to uniquely identify client IP addresses for throttling. If the X-Forwarded-For
header is present then it will be used, otherwise the value of the REMOTE_ADDR
variable from the WSGI environment will be used.
If you need to strictly identify unique client IP addresses, you'll need to first configure the number of application proxies that the API runs behind by setting the NUM_PROXIES
setting. This setting should be an integer of zero or more. If set to non-zero then the client IP will be identified as being the last IP address in the X-Forwarded-For
header, once any application proxy IP addresses have first been excluded. If set to zero, then the REMOTE_ADDR
value will always be used as the identifying IP address.
It is important to understand that if you configure the NUM_PROXIES
setting, then all clients behind a unique NAT'd gateway will be treated as a single client.
Further context on how the X-Forwarded-For
header works, and identifying a remote client IP can be found here.
The throttle classes provided by REST framework use Django's cache backend. You should make sure that you've set appropriate cache settings. The default value of LocMemCache
backend should be okay for simple setups. See Django's cache documentation for more details.
If you need to use a cache other than 'default'
, you can do so by creating a custom throttle class and setting the cache
attribute. For example:
from django.core.cache import caches
+
+class CustomAnonRateThrottle(AnonRateThrottle):
+ cache = caches['alternate']
+
+You'll need to remember to also set your custom throttle class in the 'DEFAULT_THROTTLE_CLASSES'
settings key, or using the throttle_classes
view attribute.
The AnonRateThrottle
will only ever throttle unauthenticated users. The IP address of the incoming request is used to generate a unique key to throttle against.
The allowed request rate is determined from one of the following (in order of preference).
+rate
property on the class, which may be provided by overriding AnonRateThrottle
and setting the property.DEFAULT_THROTTLE_RATES['anon']
setting.AnonRateThrottle
is suitable if you want to restrict the rate of requests from unknown sources.
The UserRateThrottle
will throttle users to a given rate of requests across the API. The user id is used to generate a unique key to throttle against. Unauthenticated requests will fall back to using the IP address of the incoming request to generate a unique key to throttle against.
The allowed request rate is determined from one of the following (in order of preference).
+rate
property on the class, which may be provided by overriding UserRateThrottle
and setting the property.DEFAULT_THROTTLE_RATES['user']
setting.An API may have multiple UserRateThrottles
in place at the same time. To do so, override UserRateThrottle
and set a unique "scope" for each class.
For example, multiple user throttle rates could be implemented by using the following classes...
+class BurstRateThrottle(UserRateThrottle):
+ scope = 'burst'
+
+class SustainedRateThrottle(UserRateThrottle):
+ scope = 'sustained'
+
+...and the following settings.
+REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ 'DEFAULT_THROTTLE_CLASSES': [
+ 'example.throttles.BurstRateThrottle',
+ 'example.throttles.SustainedRateThrottle'
+ ],
+ 'DEFAULT_THROTTLE_RATES': {
+ 'burst': '60/min',
+ 'sustained': '1000/day'
+ }
+}
+
+UserRateThrottle
is suitable if you want simple global rate restrictions per-user.
The ScopedRateThrottle
class can be used to restrict access to specific parts of the API. This throttle will only be applied if the view that is being accessed includes a .throttle_scope
property. The unique throttle key will then be formed by concatenating the "scope" of the request with the unique user id or IP address.
The allowed request rate is determined by the DEFAULT_THROTTLE_RATES
setting using a key from the request "scope".
For example, given the following views...
+class ContactListView(APIView):
+ throttle_scope = 'contacts'
+ ...
+
+class ContactDetailView(APIView):
+ throttle_scope = 'contacts'
+ ...
+
+class UploadView(APIView):
+ throttle_scope = 'uploads'
+ ...
+
+...and the following settings.
+REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ 'DEFAULT_THROTTLE_CLASSES': [
+ 'rest_framework.throttling.ScopedRateThrottle',
+ ],
+ 'DEFAULT_THROTTLE_RATES': {
+ 'contacts': '1000/day',
+ 'uploads': '20/day'
+ }
+}
+
+User requests to either ContactListView
or ContactDetailView
would be restricted to a total of 1000 requests per-day. User requests to UploadView
would be restricted to 20 requests per day.
To create a custom throttle, override BaseThrottle
and implement .allow_request(self, request, view)
. The method should return True
if the request should be allowed, and False
otherwise.
Optionally you may also override the .wait()
method. If implemented, .wait()
should return a recommended number of seconds to wait before attempting the next request, or None
. The .wait()
method will only be called if .allow_request()
has previously returned False
.
If the .wait()
method is implemented and the request is throttled, then a Retry-After
header will be included in the response.
The following is an example of a rate throttle, that will randomly throttle 1 in every 10 requests.
+import random
+
+class RandomRateThrottle(throttling.BaseThrottle):
+ def allow_request(self, request, view):
+ return random.randint(1, 10) != 1
+
+
+
+ ++Validators can be useful for re-using validation logic between different types of fields.
+ +
Most of the time you're dealing with validation in REST framework you'll simply be relying on the default field validation, or writing explicit validation methods on serializer or field classes.
+However, sometimes you'll want to place your validation logic into reusable components, so that it can easily be reused throughout your codebase. This can be achieved by using validator functions and validator classes.
+Validation in Django REST framework serializers is handled a little differently to how validation works in Django's ModelForm
class.
With ModelForm
the validation is performed partially on the form, and partially on the model instance. With REST framework the validation is performed entirely on the serializer class. This is advantageous for the following reasons:
ModelSerializer
classes and using explicit Serializer
classes. Any validation behavior being used for ModelSerializer
is simple to replicate.repr
of a serializer instance will show you exactly what validation rules it applies. There's no extra hidden validation behavior being called on the model instance.When you're using ModelSerializer
all of this is handled automatically for you. If you want to drop down to using Serializer
classes instead, then you need to define the validation rules explicitly.
As an example of how REST framework uses explicit validation, we'll take a simple model class that has a field with a uniqueness constraint.
+class CustomerReportRecord(models.Model):
+ time_raised = models.DateTimeField(default=timezone.now, editable=False)
+ reference = models.CharField(unique=True, max_length=20)
+ description = models.TextField()
+
+Here's a basic ModelSerializer
that we can use for creating or updating instances of CustomerReportRecord
:
class CustomerReportSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+ class Meta:
+ model = CustomerReportRecord
+
+If we open up the Django shell using manage.py shell
we can now
>>> from project.example.serializers import CustomerReportSerializer
+>>> serializer = CustomerReportSerializer()
+>>> print(repr(serializer))
+CustomerReportSerializer():
+ id = IntegerField(label='ID', read_only=True)
+ time_raised = DateTimeField(read_only=True)
+ reference = CharField(max_length=20, validators=[<UniqueValidator(queryset=CustomerReportRecord.objects.all())>])
+ description = CharField(style={'type': 'textarea'})
+
+The interesting bit here is the reference
field. We can see that the uniqueness constraint is being explicitly enforced by a validator on the serializer field.
Because of this more explicit style REST framework includes a few validator classes that are not available in core Django. These classes are detailed below.
+This validator can be used to enforce the unique=True
constraint on model fields.
+It takes a single required argument, and an optional messages
argument:
queryset
required - This is the queryset against which uniqueness should be enforced.message
- The error message that should be used when validation fails.lookup
- The lookup used to find an existing instance with the value being validated. Defaults to 'exact'
.This validator should be applied to serializer fields, like so:
+from rest_framework.validators import UniqueValidator
+
+slug = SlugField(
+ max_length=100,
+ validators=[UniqueValidator(queryset=BlogPost.objects.all())]
+)
+
+This validator can be used to enforce unique_together
constraints on model instances.
+It has two required arguments, and a single optional messages
argument:
queryset
required - This is the queryset against which uniqueness should be enforced.fields
required - A list or tuple of field names which should make a unique set. These must exist as fields on the serializer class.message
- The error message that should be used when validation fails.The validator should be applied to serializer classes, like so:
+from rest_framework.validators import UniqueTogetherValidator
+
+class ExampleSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
+ # ...
+ class Meta:
+ # ToDo items belong to a parent list, and have an ordering defined
+ # by the 'position' field. No two items in a given list may share
+ # the same position.
+ validators = [
+ UniqueTogetherValidator(
+ queryset=ToDoItem.objects.all(),
+ fields=['list', 'position']
+ )
+ ]
+
+Note: The UniqueTogetherValidator
class always imposes an implicit constraint that all the fields it applies to are always treated as required. Fields with default
values are an exception to this as they always supply a value even when omitted from user input.
These validators can be used to enforce the unique_for_date
, unique_for_month
and unique_for_year
constraints on model instances. They take the following arguments:
queryset
required - This is the queryset against which uniqueness should be enforced.field
required - A field name against which uniqueness in the given date range will be validated. This must exist as a field on the serializer class.date_field
required - A field name which will be used to determine date range for the uniqueness constrain. This must exist as a field on the serializer class.message
- The error message that should be used when validation fails.The validator should be applied to serializer classes, like so:
+from rest_framework.validators import UniqueForYearValidator
+
+class ExampleSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
+ # ...
+ class Meta:
+ # Blog posts should have a slug that is unique for the current year.
+ validators = [
+ UniqueForYearValidator(
+ queryset=BlogPostItem.objects.all(),
+ field='slug',
+ date_field='published'
+ )
+ ]
+
+The date field that is used for the validation is always required to be present on the serializer class. You can't simply rely on a model class default=...
, because the value being used for the default wouldn't be generated until after the validation has run.
There are a couple of styles you may want to use for this depending on how you want your API to behave. If you're using ModelSerializer
you'll probably simply rely on the defaults that REST framework generates for you, but if you are using Serializer
or simply want more explicit control, use on of the styles demonstrated below.
If you want the date field to be writable the only thing worth noting is that you should ensure that it is always available in the input data, either by setting a default
argument, or by setting required=True
.
published = serializers.DateTimeField(required=True)
+
+If you want the date field to be visible, but not editable by the user, then set read_only=True
and additionally set a default=...
argument.
published = serializers.DateTimeField(read_only=True, default=timezone.now)
+
+If you want the date field to be entirely hidden from the user, then use HiddenField
. This field type does not accept user input, but instead always returns its default value to the validated_data
in the serializer.
published = serializers.HiddenField(default=timezone.now)
+
+Note: The UniqueFor<Range>Validator
classes impose an implicit constraint that the fields they are applied to are always treated as required. Fields with default
values are an exception to this as they always supply a value even when omitted from user input.
Validators that are applied across multiple fields in the serializer can sometimes require a field input that should not be provided by the API client, but that is available as input to the validator.
+Two patterns that you may want to use for this sort of validation include:
+HiddenField
. This field will be present in validated_data
but will not be used in the serializer output representation.read_only=True
, but that also includes a default=…
argument. This field will be used in the serializer output representation, but cannot be set directly by the user.REST framework includes a couple of defaults that may be useful in this context.
+A default class that can be used to represent the current user. In order to use this, the 'request' must have been provided as part of the context dictionary when instantiating the serializer.
+owner = serializers.HiddenField(
+ default=serializers.CurrentUserDefault()
+)
+
+A default class that can be used to only set a default argument during create operations. During updates the field is omitted.
+It takes a single argument, which is the default value or callable that should be used during create operations.
+created_at = serializers.DateTimeField(
+ default=serializers.CreateOnlyDefault(timezone.now)
+)
+
+There are some ambiguous cases where you'll need to instead handle validation
+explicitly, rather than relying on the default serializer classes that
+ModelSerializer
generates.
In these cases you may want to disable the automatically generated validators,
+by specifying an empty list for the serializer Meta.validators
attribute.
By default "unique together" validation enforces that all fields be
+required=True
. In some cases, you might want to explicit apply
+required=False
to one of the fields, in which case the desired behaviour
+of the validation is ambiguous.
In this case you will typically need to exclude the validator from the
+serializer class, and instead write any validation logic explicitly, either
+in the .validate()
method, or else in the view.
For example:
+class BillingRecordSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+ def validate(self, attrs):
+ # Apply custom validation either here, or in the view.
+
+ class Meta:
+ fields = ['client', 'date', 'amount']
+ extra_kwargs = {'client': {'required': False}}
+ validators = [] # Remove a default "unique together" constraint.
+
+When applying an update to an existing instance, uniqueness validators will
+exclude the current instance from the uniqueness check. The current instance
+is available in the context of the uniqueness check, because it exists as
+an attribute on the serializer, having initially been passed using
+instance=...
when instantiating the serializer.
In the case of update operations on nested serializers there's no way of +applying this exclusion, because the instance is not available.
+Again, you'll probably want to explicitly remove the validator from the
+serializer class, and write the code the for the validation constraint
+explicitly, in a .validate()
method, or in the view.
If you're not sure exactly what behavior a ModelSerializer
class will
+generate it is usually a good idea to run manage.py shell
, and print
+an instance of the serializer, so that you can inspect the fields and
+validators that it automatically generates for you.
>>> serializer = MyComplexModelSerializer()
+>>> print(serializer)
+class MyComplexModelSerializer:
+ my_fields = ...
+
+Also keep in mind that with complex cases it can often be better to explicitly
+define your serializer classes, rather than relying on the default
+ModelSerializer
behavior. This involves a little more code, but ensures
+that the resulting behavior is more transparent.
You can use any of Django's existing validators, or write your own custom validators.
+A validator may be any callable that raises a serializers.ValidationError
on failure.
def even_number(value):
+ if value % 2 != 0:
+ raise serializers.ValidationError('This field must be an even number.')
+
+You can specify custom field-level validation by adding .validate_<field_name>
methods
+to your Serializer
subclass. This is documented in the
+Serializer docs
To write a class-based validator, use the __call__
method. Class-based validators are useful as they allow you to parameterize and reuse behavior.
class MultipleOf(object):
+ def __init__(self, base):
+ self.base = base
+
+ def __call__(self, value):
+ if value % self.base != 0:
+ message = 'This field must be a multiple of %d.' % self.base
+ raise serializers.ValidationError(message)
+
+In some advanced cases you might want a validator to be passed the serializer
+field it is being used with as additional context. You can do so by setting
+a requires_context = True
attribute on the validator. The __call__
method
+will then be called with the serializer_field
+or serializer
as an additional argument.
requires_context = True
+
+def __call__(self, value, serializer_field):
+ ...
+
+
+
+ ++Versioning an interface is just a "polite" way to kill deployed clients.
+— Roy Fielding.
+
API versioning allows you to alter behavior between different clients. REST framework provides for a number of different versioning schemes.
+Versioning is determined by the incoming client request, and may either be based on the request URL, or based on the request headers.
+There are a number of valid approaches to approaching versioning. Non-versioned systems can also be appropriate, particularly if you're engineering for very long-term systems with multiple clients outside of your control.
+When API versioning is enabled, the request.version
attribute will contain a string that corresponds to the version requested in the incoming client request.
By default, versioning is not enabled, and request.version
will always return None
.
How you vary the API behavior is up to you, but one example you might typically want is to switch to a different serialization style in a newer version. For example:
+def get_serializer_class(self):
+ if self.request.version == 'v1':
+ return AccountSerializerVersion1
+ return AccountSerializer
+
+The reverse
function included by REST framework ties in with the versioning scheme. You need to make sure to include the current request
as a keyword argument, like so.
from rest_framework.reverse import reverse
+
+reverse('bookings-list', request=request)
+
+The above function will apply any URL transformations appropriate to the request version. For example:
+NamespaceVersioning
was being used, and the API version was 'v1', then the URL lookup used would be 'v1:bookings-list'
, which might resolve to a URL like http://example.org/v1/bookings/
.QueryParameterVersioning
was being used, and the API version was 1.0
, then the returned URL might be something like http://example.org/bookings/?version=1.0
When using hyperlinked serialization styles together with a URL based versioning scheme make sure to include the request as context to the serializer.
+def get(self, request):
+ queryset = Booking.objects.all()
+ serializer = BookingsSerializer(queryset, many=True, context={'request': request})
+ return Response({'all_bookings': serializer.data})
+
+Doing so will allow any returned URLs to include the appropriate versioning.
+The versioning scheme is defined by the DEFAULT_VERSIONING_CLASS
settings key.
REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ 'DEFAULT_VERSIONING_CLASS': 'rest_framework.versioning.NamespaceVersioning'
+}
+
+Unless it is explicitly set, the value for DEFAULT_VERSIONING_CLASS
will be None
. In this case the request.version
attribute will always return None
.
You can also set the versioning scheme on an individual view. Typically you won't need to do this, as it makes more sense to have a single versioning scheme used globally. If you do need to do so, use the versioning_class
attribute.
class ProfileList(APIView):
+ versioning_class = versioning.QueryParameterVersioning
+
+The following settings keys are also used to control versioning:
+DEFAULT_VERSION
. The value that should be used for request.version
when no versioning information is present. Defaults to None
.ALLOWED_VERSIONS
. If set, this value will restrict the set of versions that may be returned by the versioning scheme, and will raise an error if the provided version is not in this set. Note that the value used for the DEFAULT_VERSION
setting is always considered to be part of the ALLOWED_VERSIONS
set (unless it is None
). Defaults to None
.VERSION_PARAM
. The string that should be used for any versioning parameters, such as in the media type or URL query parameters. Defaults to 'version'
.You can also set your versioning class plus those three values on a per-view or a per-viewset basis by defining your own versioning scheme and using the default_version
, allowed_versions
and version_param
class variables. For example, if you want to use URLPathVersioning
:
from rest_framework.versioning import URLPathVersioning
+from rest_framework.views import APIView
+
+class ExampleVersioning(URLPathVersioning):
+ default_version = ...
+ allowed_versions = ...
+ version_param = ...
+
+class ExampleView(APIVIew):
+ versioning_class = ExampleVersioning
+
+This scheme requires the client to specify the version as part of the media type in the Accept
header. The version is included as a media type parameter, that supplements the main media type.
Here's an example HTTP request using the accept header versioning style.
+GET /bookings/ HTTP/1.1
+Host: example.com
+Accept: application/json; version=1.0
+
+In the example request above request.version
attribute would return the string '1.0'
.
Versioning based on accept headers is generally considered as best practice, although other styles may be suitable depending on your client requirements.
+Strictly speaking the json
media type is not specified as including additional parameters. If you are building a well-specified public API you might consider using a vendor media type. To do so, configure your renderers to use a JSON based renderer with a custom media type:
class BookingsAPIRenderer(JSONRenderer):
+ media_type = 'application/vnd.megacorp.bookings+json'
+
+Your client requests would now look like this:
+GET /bookings/ HTTP/1.1
+Host: example.com
+Accept: application/vnd.megacorp.bookings+json; version=1.0
+
+This scheme requires the client to specify the version as part of the URL path.
+GET /v1/bookings/ HTTP/1.1
+Host: example.com
+Accept: application/json
+
+Your URL conf must include a pattern that matches the version with a 'version'
keyword argument, so that this information is available to the versioning scheme.
urlpatterns = [
+ re_path(
+ r'^(?P<version>(v1|v2))/bookings/$',
+ bookings_list,
+ name='bookings-list'
+ ),
+ re_path(
+ r'^(?P<version>(v1|v2))/bookings/(?P<pk>[0-9]+)/$',
+ bookings_detail,
+ name='bookings-detail'
+ )
+]
+
+To the client, this scheme is the same as URLPathVersioning
. The only difference is how it is configured in your Django application, as it uses URL namespacing, instead of URL keyword arguments.
GET /v1/something/ HTTP/1.1
+Host: example.com
+Accept: application/json
+
+With this scheme the request.version
attribute is determined based on the namespace
that matches the incoming request path.
In the following example we're giving a set of views two different possible URL prefixes, each under a different namespace:
+# bookings/urls.py
+urlpatterns = [
+ re_path(r'^$', bookings_list, name='bookings-list'),
+ re_path(r'^(?P<pk>[0-9]+)/$', bookings_detail, name='bookings-detail')
+]
+
+# urls.py
+urlpatterns = [
+ re_path(r'^v1/bookings/', include('bookings.urls', namespace='v1')),
+ re_path(r'^v2/bookings/', include('bookings.urls', namespace='v2'))
+]
+
+Both URLPathVersioning
and NamespaceVersioning
are reasonable if you just need a simple versioning scheme. The URLPathVersioning
approach might be better suitable for small ad-hoc projects, and the NamespaceVersioning
is probably easier to manage for larger projects.
The hostname versioning scheme requires the client to specify the requested version as part of the hostname in the URL.
+For example the following is an HTTP request to the http://v1.example.com/bookings/
URL:
GET /bookings/ HTTP/1.1
+Host: v1.example.com
+Accept: application/json
+
+By default this implementation expects the hostname to match this simple regular expression:
+^([a-zA-Z0-9]+)\.[a-zA-Z0-9]+\.[a-zA-Z0-9]+$
+
+Note that the first group is enclosed in brackets, indicating that this is the matched portion of the hostname.
+The HostNameVersioning
scheme can be awkward to use in debug mode as you will typically be accessing a raw IP address such as 127.0.0.1
. There are various online tutorials on how to access localhost with a custom subdomain which you may find helpful in this case.
Hostname based versioning can be particularly useful if you have requirements to route incoming requests to different servers based on the version, as you can configure different DNS records for different API versions.
+This scheme is a simple style that includes the version as a query parameter in the URL. For example:
+GET /something/?version=0.1 HTTP/1.1
+Host: example.com
+Accept: application/json
+
+To implement a custom versioning scheme, subclass BaseVersioning
and override the .determine_version
method.
The following example uses a custom X-API-Version
header to determine the requested version.
class XAPIVersionScheme(versioning.BaseVersioning):
+ def determine_version(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
+ return request.META.get('HTTP_X_API_VERSION', None)
+
+If your versioning scheme is based on the request URL, you will also want to alter how versioned URLs are determined. In order to do so you should override the .reverse()
method on the class. See the source code for examples.
++Django's class-based views are a welcome departure from the old-style views.
+ +
REST framework provides an APIView
class, which subclasses Django's View
class.
APIView
classes are different from regular View
classes in the following ways:
Request
instances, not Django's HttpRequest
instances.Response
, instead of Django's HttpResponse
. The view will manage content negotiation and setting the correct renderer on the response.APIException
exceptions will be caught and mediated into appropriate responses.Using the APIView
class is pretty much the same as using a regular View
class, as usual, the incoming request is dispatched to an appropriate handler method such as .get()
or .post()
. Additionally, a number of attributes may be set on the class that control various aspects of the API policy.
For example:
+from rest_framework.views import APIView
+from rest_framework.response import Response
+from rest_framework import authentication, permissions
+from django.contrib.auth.models import User
+
+class ListUsers(APIView):
+ """
+ View to list all users in the system.
+
+ * Requires token authentication.
+ * Only admin users are able to access this view.
+ """
+ authentication_classes = [authentication.TokenAuthentication]
+ permission_classes = [permissions.IsAdminUser]
+
+ def get(self, request, format=None):
+ """
+ Return a list of all users.
+ """
+ usernames = [user.username for user in User.objects.all()]
+ return Response(usernames)
+
+Note: The full methods, attributes on, and relations between Django REST Framework's APIView
, GenericAPIView
, various Mixins
, and Viewsets
can be initially complex. In addition to the documentation here, the Classy Django REST Framework resource provides a browsable reference, with full methods and attributes, for each of Django REST Framework's class-based views.
The following attributes control the pluggable aspects of API views.
+The following methods are used by REST framework to instantiate the various pluggable API policies. You won't typically need to override these methods.
+The following methods are called before dispatching to the handler method.
+The following methods are called directly by the view's .dispatch()
method.
+These perform any actions that need to occur before or after calling the handler methods such as .get()
, .post()
, put()
, patch()
and .delete()
.
Performs any actions that need to occur before the handler method gets called. +This method is used to enforce permissions and throttling, and perform content negotiation.
+You won't typically need to override this method.
+Any exception thrown by the handler method will be passed to this method, which either returns a Response
instance, or re-raises the exception.
The default implementation handles any subclass of rest_framework.exceptions.APIException
, as well as Django's Http404
and PermissionDenied
exceptions, and returns an appropriate error response.
If you need to customize the error responses your API returns you should subclass this method.
+Ensures that the request object that is passed to the handler method is an instance of Request
, rather than the usual Django HttpRequest
.
You won't typically need to override this method.
+Ensures that any Response
object returned from the handler method will be rendered into the correct content type, as determined by the content negotiation.
You won't typically need to override this method.
+++Saying [that class-based views] is always the superior solution is a mistake.
+ +
REST framework also allows you to work with regular function based views. It provides a set of simple decorators that wrap your function based views to ensure they receive an instance of Request
(rather than the usual Django HttpRequest
) and allows them to return a Response
(instead of a Django HttpResponse
), and allow you to configure how the request is processed.
Signature: @api_view(http_method_names=['GET'])
The core of this functionality is the api_view
decorator, which takes a list of HTTP methods that your view should respond to. For example, this is how you would write a very simple view that just manually returns some data:
from rest_framework.decorators import api_view
+
+@api_view()
+def hello_world(request):
+ return Response({"message": "Hello, world!"})
+
+This view will use the default renderers, parsers, authentication classes etc specified in the settings.
+By default only GET
methods will be accepted. Other methods will respond with "405 Method Not Allowed". To alter this behaviour, specify which methods the view allows, like so:
@api_view(['GET', 'POST'])
+def hello_world(request):
+ if request.method == 'POST':
+ return Response({"message": "Got some data!", "data": request.data})
+ return Response({"message": "Hello, world!"})
+
+To override the default settings, REST framework provides a set of additional decorators which can be added to your views. These must come after (below) the @api_view
decorator. For example, to create a view that uses a throttle to ensure it can only be called once per day by a particular user, use the @throttle_classes
decorator, passing a list of throttle classes:
from rest_framework.decorators import api_view, throttle_classes
+from rest_framework.throttling import UserRateThrottle
+
+class OncePerDayUserThrottle(UserRateThrottle):
+ rate = '1/day'
+
+@api_view(['GET'])
+@throttle_classes([OncePerDayUserThrottle])
+def view(request):
+ return Response({"message": "Hello for today! See you tomorrow!"})
+
+These decorators correspond to the attributes set on APIView
subclasses, described above.
The available decorators are:
+@renderer_classes(...)
@parser_classes(...)
@authentication_classes(...)
@throttle_classes(...)
@permission_classes(...)
Each of these decorators takes a single argument which must be a list or tuple of classes.
+To override the default schema generation for function based views you may use
+the @schema
decorator. This must come after (below) the @api_view
+decorator. For example:
from rest_framework.decorators import api_view, schema
+from rest_framework.schemas import AutoSchema
+
+class CustomAutoSchema(AutoSchema):
+ def get_link(self, path, method, base_url):
+ # override view introspection here...
+
+@api_view(['GET'])
+@schema(CustomAutoSchema())
+def view(request):
+ return Response({"message": "Hello for today! See you tomorrow!"})
+
+This decorator takes a single AutoSchema
instance, an AutoSchema
subclass
+instance or ManualSchema
instance as described in the Schemas documentation.
+You may pass None
in order to exclude the view from schema generation.
@api_view(['GET'])
+@schema(None)
+def view(request):
+ return Response({"message": "Will not appear in schema!"})
+
+
+
+ ++After routing has determined which controller to use for a request, your controller is responsible for making sense of the request and producing the appropriate output.
+ +
Django REST framework allows you to combine the logic for a set of related views in a single class, called a ViewSet
. In other frameworks you may also find conceptually similar implementations named something like 'Resources' or 'Controllers'.
A ViewSet
class is simply a type of class-based View, that does not provide any method handlers such as .get()
or .post()
, and instead provides actions such as .list()
and .create()
.
The method handlers for a ViewSet
are only bound to the corresponding actions at the point of finalizing the view, using the .as_view()
method.
Typically, rather than explicitly registering the views in a viewset in the urlconf, you'll register the viewset with a router class, that automatically determines the urlconf for you.
+Let's define a simple viewset that can be used to list or retrieve all the users in the system.
+from django.contrib.auth.models import User
+from django.shortcuts import get_object_or_404
+from myapps.serializers import UserSerializer
+from rest_framework import viewsets
+from rest_framework.response import Response
+
+class UserViewSet(viewsets.ViewSet):
+ """
+ A simple ViewSet for listing or retrieving users.
+ """
+ def list(self, request):
+ queryset = User.objects.all()
+ serializer = UserSerializer(queryset, many=True)
+ return Response(serializer.data)
+
+ def retrieve(self, request, pk=None):
+ queryset = User.objects.all()
+ user = get_object_or_404(queryset, pk=pk)
+ serializer = UserSerializer(user)
+ return Response(serializer.data)
+
+If we need to, we can bind this viewset into two separate views, like so:
+user_list = UserViewSet.as_view({'get': 'list'})
+user_detail = UserViewSet.as_view({'get': 'retrieve'})
+
+Typically we wouldn't do this, but would instead register the viewset with a router, and allow the urlconf to be automatically generated.
+from myapp.views import UserViewSet
+from rest_framework.routers import DefaultRouter
+
+router = DefaultRouter()
+router.register(r'users', UserViewSet, basename='user')
+urlpatterns = router.urls
+
+Rather than writing your own viewsets, you'll often want to use the existing base classes that provide a default set of behavior. For example:
+class UserViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
+ """
+ A viewset for viewing and editing user instances.
+ """
+ serializer_class = UserSerializer
+ queryset = User.objects.all()
+
+There are two main advantages of using a ViewSet
class over using a View
class.
queryset
once, and it'll be used across multiple views.Both of these come with a trade-off. Using regular views and URL confs is more explicit and gives you more control. ViewSets are helpful if you want to get up and running quickly, or when you have a large API and you want to enforce a consistent URL configuration throughout.
+The default routers included with REST framework will provide routes for a standard set of create/retrieve/update/destroy style actions, as shown below:
+class UserViewSet(viewsets.ViewSet):
+ """
+ Example empty viewset demonstrating the standard
+ actions that will be handled by a router class.
+
+ If you're using format suffixes, make sure to also include
+ the `format=None` keyword argument for each action.
+ """
+
+ def list(self, request):
+ pass
+
+ def create(self, request):
+ pass
+
+ def retrieve(self, request, pk=None):
+ pass
+
+ def update(self, request, pk=None):
+ pass
+
+ def partial_update(self, request, pk=None):
+ pass
+
+ def destroy(self, request, pk=None):
+ pass
+
+During dispatch, the following attributes are available on the ViewSet
.
basename
- the base to use for the URL names that are created.action
- the name of the current action (e.g., list
, create
).detail
- boolean indicating if the current action is configured for a list or detail view.suffix
- the display suffix for the viewset type - mirrors the detail
attribute.name
- the display name for the viewset. This argument is mutually exclusive to suffix
.description
- the display description for the individual view of a viewset.You may inspect these attributes to adjust behaviour based on the current action. For example, you could restrict permissions to everything except the list
action similar to this:
def get_permissions(self):
+ """
+ Instantiates and returns the list of permissions that this view requires.
+ """
+ if self.action == 'list':
+ permission_classes = [IsAuthenticated]
+ else:
+ permission_classes = [IsAdmin]
+ return [permission() for permission in permission_classes]
+
+If you have ad-hoc methods that should be routable, you can mark them as such with the @action
decorator. Like regular actions, extra actions may be intended for either a single object, or an entire collection. To indicate this, set the detail
argument to True
or False
. The router will configure its URL patterns accordingly. e.g., the DefaultRouter
will configure detail actions to contain pk
in their URL patterns.
A more complete example of extra actions:
+from django.contrib.auth.models import User
+from rest_framework import status, viewsets
+from rest_framework.decorators import action
+from rest_framework.response import Response
+from myapp.serializers import UserSerializer, PasswordSerializer
+
+class UserViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
+ """
+ A viewset that provides the standard actions
+ """
+ queryset = User.objects.all()
+ serializer_class = UserSerializer
+
+ @action(detail=True, methods=['post'])
+ def set_password(self, request, pk=None):
+ user = self.get_object()
+ serializer = PasswordSerializer(data=request.data)
+ if serializer.is_valid():
+ user.set_password(serializer.data['password'])
+ user.save()
+ return Response({'status': 'password set'})
+ else:
+ return Response(serializer.errors,
+ status=status.HTTP_400_BAD_REQUEST)
+
+ @action(detail=False)
+ def recent_users(self, request):
+ recent_users = User.objects.all().order_by('-last_login')
+
+ page = self.paginate_queryset(recent_users)
+ if page is not None:
+ serializer = self.get_serializer(page, many=True)
+ return self.get_paginated_response(serializer.data)
+
+ serializer = self.get_serializer(recent_users, many=True)
+ return Response(serializer.data)
+
+The decorator can additionally take extra arguments that will be set for the routed view only. For example:
+ @action(detail=True, methods=['post'], permission_classes=[IsAdminOrIsSelf])
+ def set_password(self, request, pk=None):
+ ...
+
+The action
decorator will route GET
requests by default, but may also accept other HTTP methods by setting the methods
argument. For example:
@action(detail=True, methods=['post', 'delete'])
+ def unset_password(self, request, pk=None):
+ ...
+
+The two new actions will then be available at the urls ^users/{pk}/set_password/$
and ^users/{pk}/unset_password/$
To view all extra actions, call the .get_extra_actions()
method.
Extra actions can map additional HTTP methods to separate ViewSet
methods. For example, the above password set/unset methods could be consolidated into a single route. Note that additional mappings do not accept arguments.
@action(detail=True, methods=['put'], name='Change Password')
+ def password(self, request, pk=None):
+ """Update the user's password."""
+ ...
+
+ @password.mapping.delete
+ def delete_password(self, request, pk=None):
+ """Delete the user's password."""
+ ...
+
+
+If you need to get the URL of an action, use the .reverse_action()
method. This is a convenience wrapper for reverse()
, automatically passing the view's request
object and prepending the url_name
with the .basename
attribute.
Note that the basename
is provided by the router during ViewSet
registration. If you are not using a router, then you must provide the basename
argument to the .as_view()
method.
Using the example from the previous section:
+>>> view.reverse_action('set-password', args=['1'])
+'http://localhost:8000/api/users/1/set_password'
+
+
+Alternatively, you can use the url_name
attribute set by the @action
decorator.
>>> view.reverse_action(view.set_password.url_name, args=['1'])
+'http://localhost:8000/api/users/1/set_password'
+
+
+The url_name
argument for .reverse_action()
should match the same argument to the @action
decorator. Additionally, this method can be used to reverse the default actions, such as list
and create
.
The ViewSet
class inherits from APIView
. You can use any of the standard attributes such as permission_classes
, authentication_classes
in order to control the API policy on the viewset.
The ViewSet
class does not provide any implementations of actions. In order to use a ViewSet
class you'll override the class and define the action implementations explicitly.
The GenericViewSet
class inherits from GenericAPIView
, and provides the default set of get_object
, get_queryset
methods and other generic view base behavior, but does not include any actions by default.
In order to use a GenericViewSet
class you'll override the class and either mixin the required mixin classes, or define the action implementations explicitly.
The ModelViewSet
class inherits from GenericAPIView
and includes implementations for various actions, by mixing in the behavior of the various mixin classes.
The actions provided by the ModelViewSet
class are .list()
, .retrieve()
, .create()
, .update()
, .partial_update()
, and .destroy()
.
Because ModelViewSet
extends GenericAPIView
, you'll normally need to provide at least the queryset
and serializer_class
attributes. For example:
class AccountViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
+ """
+ A simple ViewSet for viewing and editing accounts.
+ """
+ queryset = Account.objects.all()
+ serializer_class = AccountSerializer
+ permission_classes = [IsAccountAdminOrReadOnly]
+
+Note that you can use any of the standard attributes or method overrides provided by GenericAPIView
. For example, to use a ViewSet
that dynamically determines the queryset it should operate on, you might do something like this:
class AccountViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
+ """
+ A simple ViewSet for viewing and editing the accounts
+ associated with the user.
+ """
+ serializer_class = AccountSerializer
+ permission_classes = [IsAccountAdminOrReadOnly]
+
+ def get_queryset(self):
+ return self.request.user.accounts.all()
+
+Note however that upon removal of the queryset
property from your ViewSet
, any associated router will be unable to derive the basename of your Model automatically, and so you will have to specify the basename
kwarg as part of your router registration.
Also note that although this class provides the complete set of create/list/retrieve/update/destroy actions by default, you can restrict the available operations by using the standard permission classes.
+The ReadOnlyModelViewSet
class also inherits from GenericAPIView
. As with ModelViewSet
it also includes implementations for various actions, but unlike ModelViewSet
only provides the 'read-only' actions, .list()
and .retrieve()
.
As with ModelViewSet
, you'll normally need to provide at least the queryset
and serializer_class
attributes. For example:
class AccountViewSet(viewsets.ReadOnlyModelViewSet):
+ """
+ A simple ViewSet for viewing accounts.
+ """
+ queryset = Account.objects.all()
+ serializer_class = AccountSerializer
+
+Again, as with ModelViewSet
, you can use any of the standard attributes and method overrides available to GenericAPIView
.
You may need to provide custom ViewSet
classes that do not have the full set of ModelViewSet
actions, or that customize the behavior in some other way.
To create a base viewset class that provides create
, list
and retrieve
operations, inherit from GenericViewSet
, and mixin the required actions:
from rest_framework import mixins
+
+class CreateListRetrieveViewSet(mixins.CreateModelMixin,
+ mixins.ListModelMixin,
+ mixins.RetrieveModelMixin,
+ viewsets.GenericViewSet):
+ """
+ A viewset that provides `retrieve`, `create`, and `list` actions.
+
+ To use it, override the class and set the `.queryset` and
+ `.serializer_class` attributes.
+ """
+ pass
+
+By creating your own base ViewSet
classes, you can provide common behavior that can be reused in multiple viewsets across your API.
The 3.0 release of Django REST framework is the result of almost four years of iteration and refinement. It comprehensively addresses some of the previous remaining design issues in serializers, fields and the generic views.
+This release is incremental in nature. There are some breaking API changes, and upgrading will require you to read the release notes carefully, but the migration path should otherwise be relatively straightforward.
+The difference in quality of the REST framework API and implementation should make writing, maintaining and debugging your application far easier.
+3.0 is the first of three releases that have been funded by our recent Kickstarter campaign.
+As ever, a huge thank you to our many wonderful sponsors. If you're looking for a Django gig, and want to work with smart community-minded folks, you should probably check out that list and see who's hiring.
+Notable features of this new release include:
+ModelSerializer
class and the explicit Serializer
class.BaseSerializer
class, making it easier to write serializers for alternative storage backends, or to completely customize your serialization and validation logic.ListField
and MultipleChoiceField
.OPTIONS
requests are handled by your API.Significant new functionality continues to be planned for the 3.1 and 3.2 releases. These releases will correspond to the two Kickstarter stretch goals - "Feature improvements" and "Admin interface". Further 3.x releases will present simple upgrades, without the same level of fundamental API changes necessary for the 3.0 release.
+This talk from the Django: Under the Hood event in Amsterdam, Nov 2014, gives some good background context on the design decisions behind 3.0.
+ + +Below is an in-depth guide to the API changes and migration notes for 3.0.
+.data
and .query_params
properties.The usage of request.DATA
and request.FILES
is now pending deprecation in favor of a single request.data
attribute that contains all the parsed data.
Having separate attributes is reasonable for web applications that only ever parse url-encoded or multipart requests, but makes less sense for the general-purpose request parsing that REST framework supports.
+You may now pass all the request data to a serializer class in a single argument:
+# Do this...
+ExampleSerializer(data=request.data)
+
+Instead of passing the files argument separately:
+# Don't do this...
+ExampleSerializer(data=request.DATA, files=request.FILES)
+
+The usage of request.QUERY_PARAMS
is now pending deprecation in favor of the lowercased request.query_params
.
Previously the serializers used a two-step object creation, as follows:
+serializer.object
.serializer.save()
would then save the object instance to the database.This style is in-line with how the ModelForm
class works in Django, but is problematic for a number of reasons:
.save()
is called.ExampleModel.objects.create(...)
. Manager classes are an excellent layer at which to enforce business logic and application-level data constraints.We now use single-step object creation, like so:
+serializer.validated_data
.serializer.save()
then saves and returns the new object instance.The resulting API changes are further detailed below.
+.create()
and .update()
methods.The .restore_object()
method is now removed, and we instead have two separate methods, .create()
and .update()
. These methods work slightly different to the previous .restore_object()
.
When using the .create()
and .update()
methods you should both create and save the object instance. This is in contrast to the previous .restore_object()
behavior that would instantiate the object but not save it.
These methods also replace the optional .save_object()
method, which no longer exists.
The following example from the tutorial previously used restore_object()
to handle both creating and updating object instances.
def restore_object(self, attrs, instance=None):
+ if instance:
+ # Update existing instance
+ instance.title = attrs.get('title', instance.title)
+ instance.code = attrs.get('code', instance.code)
+ instance.linenos = attrs.get('linenos', instance.linenos)
+ instance.language = attrs.get('language', instance.language)
+ instance.style = attrs.get('style', instance.style)
+ return instance
+
+ # Create new instance
+ return Snippet(**attrs)
+
+This would now be split out into two separate methods.
+def update(self, instance, validated_data):
+ instance.title = validated_data.get('title', instance.title)
+ instance.code = validated_data.get('code', instance.code)
+ instance.linenos = validated_data.get('linenos', instance.linenos)
+ instance.language = validated_data.get('language', instance.language)
+ instance.style = validated_data.get('style', instance.style)
+ instance.save()
+ return instance
+
+def create(self, validated_data):
+ return Snippet.objects.create(**validated_data)
+
+Note that these methods should return the newly created object instance.
+.validated_data
instead of .object
.You must now use the .validated_data
attribute if you need to inspect the data before saving, rather than using the .object
attribute, which no longer exists.
For example the following code is no longer valid:
+if serializer.is_valid():
+ name = serializer.object.name # Inspect validated field data.
+ logging.info('Creating ticket "%s"' % name)
+ serializer.object.user = request.user # Include the user when saving.
+ serializer.save()
+
+Instead of using .object
to inspect a partially constructed instance, you would now use .validated_data
to inspect the cleaned incoming values. Also you can't set extra attributes on the instance directly, but instead pass them to the .save()
method as keyword arguments.
The corresponding code would now look like this:
+if serializer.is_valid():
+ name = serializer.validated_data['name'] # Inspect validated field data.
+ logging.info('Creating ticket "%s"' % name)
+ serializer.save(user=request.user) # Include the user when saving.
+
+.is_valid(raise_exception=True)
The .is_valid()
method now takes an optional boolean flag, raise_exception
.
Calling .is_valid(raise_exception=True)
will cause a ValidationError
to be raised if the serializer data contains validation errors. This error will be handled by REST framework's default exception handler, allowing you to remove error response handling from your view code.
The handling and formatting of error responses may be altered globally by using the EXCEPTION_HANDLER
settings key.
This change also means it's now possible to alter the style of error responses used by the built-in generic views, without having to include mixin classes or other overrides.
+serializers.ValidationError
.Previously serializers.ValidationError
error was simply a synonym for django.core.exceptions.ValidationError
. This has now been altered so that it inherits from the standard APIException
base class.
The reason behind this is that Django's ValidationError
class is intended for use with HTML forms and its API makes using it slightly awkward with nested validation errors that can occur in serializers.
For most users this change shouldn't require any updates to your codebase, but it is worth ensuring that whenever raising validation errors you should prefer using the serializers.ValidationError
exception class, and not Django's built-in exception.
We strongly recommend that you use the namespaced import style of import serializers
and not from serializers import ValidationError
in order to avoid any potential confusion.
validate_<field_name>
.The validate_<field_name>
method hooks that can be attached to serializer classes change their signature slightly and return type. Previously these would take a dictionary of all incoming data, and a key representing the field name, and would return a dictionary including the validated data for that field:
def validate_score(self, attrs, source):
+ if attrs['score'] % 10 != 0:
+ raise serializers.ValidationError('This field should be a multiple of ten.')
+ return attrs
+
+This is now simplified slightly, and the method hooks simply take the value to be validated, and return the validated value.
+def validate_score(self, value):
+ if value % 10 != 0:
+ raise serializers.ValidationError('This field should be a multiple of ten.')
+ return value
+
+Any ad-hoc validation that applies to more than one field should go in the .validate(self, attrs)
method as usual.
Because .validate_<field_name>
would previously accept the complete dictionary of attributes, it could be used to validate a field depending on the input in another field. Now if you need to do this you should use .validate()
instead.
You can either return non_field_errors
from the validate method by raising a simple ValidationError
def validate(self, attrs):
+ # serializer.errors == {'non_field_errors': ['A non field error']}
+ raise serializers.ValidationError('A non field error')
+
+Alternatively if you want the errors to be against a specific field, use a dictionary of when instantiating the ValidationError
, like so:
def validate(self, attrs):
+ # serializer.errors == {'my_field': ['A field error']}
+ raise serializers.ValidationError({'my_field': 'A field error'})
+
+This ensures you can still write validation that compares all the input fields, but that marks the error against a particular field.
+transform_<field_name>
.The under-used transform_<field_name>
on serializer classes is no longer provided. Instead you should just override to_representation()
if you need to apply any modifications to the representation style.
For example:
+def to_representation(self, instance):
+ ret = super(UserSerializer, self).to_representation(instance)
+ ret['username'] = ret['username'].lower()
+ return ret
+
+Dropping the extra point of API means there's now only one right way to do things. This helps with repetition and reinforcement of the core API, rather than having multiple differing approaches.
+If you absolutely need to preserve transform_<field_name>
behavior, for example, in order to provide a simpler 2.x to 3.0 upgrade, you can use a mixin, or serializer base class that add the behavior back in. For example:
class BaseModelSerializer(ModelSerializer):
+ """
+ A custom ModelSerializer class that preserves 2.x style `transform_<field_name>` behavior.
+ """
+ def to_representation(self, instance):
+ ret = super(BaseModelSerializer, self).to_representation(instance)
+ for key, value in ret.items():
+ method = getattr(self, 'transform_' + key, None)
+ if method is not None:
+ ret[key] = method(value)
+ return ret
+
+This change also means that we no longer use the .full_clean()
method on model instances, but instead perform all validation explicitly on the serializer. This gives a cleaner separation, and ensures that there's no automatic validation behavior on ModelSerializer
classes that can't also be easily replicated on regular Serializer
classes.
For the most part this change should be transparent. Field validation and uniqueness checks will still be run as normal, but the implementation is a little different.
+The one difference that you do need to note is that the .clean()
method will not be called as part of serializer validation, as it would be if using a ModelForm
. Use the serializer .validate()
method to perform a final validation step on incoming data where required.
There may be some cases where you really do need to keep validation logic in the model .clean()
method, and cannot instead separate it into the serializer .validate()
. You can do so by explicitly instantiating a model instance in the .validate()
method.
def validate(self, attrs):
+ instance = ExampleModel(**attrs)
+ instance.clean()
+ return attrs
+
+Again, you really should look at properly separating the validation logic out of the model method if possible, but the above might be useful in some backwards compatibility cases, or for an easy migration path.
+REST framework 2.x attempted to automatically support writable nested serialization, but the behavior was complex and non-obvious. Attempting to automatically handle these case is problematic:
+None
data.Using the depth
option on ModelSerializer
will now create read-only nested serializers by default.
If you try to use a writable nested serializer without writing a custom create()
and/or update()
method you'll see an assertion error when you attempt to save the serializer. For example:
>>> class ProfileSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+>>> class Meta:
+>>> model = Profile
+>>> fields = ['address', 'phone']
+>>>
+>>> class UserSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+>>> profile = ProfileSerializer()
+>>> class Meta:
+>>> model = User
+>>> fields = ['username', 'email', 'profile']
+>>>
+>>> data = {
+>>> 'username': 'lizzy',
+>>> 'email': 'lizzy@example.com',
+>>> 'profile': {'address': '123 Acacia Avenue', 'phone': '01273 100200'}
+>>> }
+>>>
+>>> serializer = UserSerializer(data=data)
+>>> serializer.save()
+AssertionError: The `.create()` method does not support nested writable fields by default. Write an explicit `.create()` method for serializer `UserSerializer`, or set `read_only=True` on nested serializer fields.
+
+To use writable nested serialization you'll want to declare a nested field on the serializer class, and write the create()
and/or update()
methods explicitly.
class UserSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+ profile = ProfileSerializer()
+
+ class Meta:
+ model = User
+ fields = ['username', 'email', 'profile']
+
+ def create(self, validated_data):
+ profile_data = validated_data.pop('profile')
+ user = User.objects.create(**validated_data)
+ Profile.objects.create(user=user, **profile_data)
+ return user
+
+The single-step object creation makes this far simpler and more obvious than the previous .restore_object()
behavior.
Serializer instances now support a printable representation that allows you to inspect the fields present on the instance.
+For instance, given the following example model:
+class LocationRating(models.Model):
+ location = models.CharField(max_length=100)
+ rating = models.IntegerField()
+ created_by = models.ForeignKey(User)
+
+Let's create a simple ModelSerializer
class corresponding to the LocationRating
model.
class LocationRatingSerializer(serializer.ModelSerializer):
+ class Meta:
+ model = LocationRating
+
+We can now inspect the serializer representation in the Django shell, using python manage.py shell
...
>>> serializer = LocationRatingSerializer()
+>>> print(serializer) # Or use `print serializer` in Python 2.x
+LocationRatingSerializer():
+ id = IntegerField(label='ID', read_only=True)
+ location = CharField(max_length=100)
+ rating = IntegerField()
+ created_by = PrimaryKeyRelatedField(queryset=User.objects.all())
+
+extra_kwargs
option.The write_only_fields
option on ModelSerializer
has been moved to PendingDeprecation
and replaced with a more generic extra_kwargs
.
class MySerializer(serializer.ModelSerializer):
+ class Meta:
+ model = MyModel
+ fields = ['id', 'email', 'notes', 'is_admin']
+ extra_kwargs = {
+ 'is_admin': {'write_only': True}
+ }
+
+Alternatively, specify the field explicitly on the serializer class:
+class MySerializer(serializer.ModelSerializer):
+ is_admin = serializers.BooleanField(write_only=True)
+
+ class Meta:
+ model = MyModel
+ fields = ['id', 'email', 'notes', 'is_admin']
+
+The read_only_fields
option remains as a convenient shortcut for the more common case.
HyperlinkedModelSerializer
.The view_name
and lookup_field
options have been moved to PendingDeprecation
. They are no longer required, as you can use the extra_kwargs
argument instead:
class MySerializer(serializer.HyperlinkedModelSerializer):
+ class Meta:
+ model = MyModel
+ fields = ['url', 'email', 'notes', 'is_admin']
+ extra_kwargs = {
+ 'url': {'lookup_field': 'uuid'}
+ }
+
+Alternatively, specify the field explicitly on the serializer class:
+class MySerializer(serializer.HyperlinkedModelSerializer):
+ url = serializers.HyperlinkedIdentityField(
+ view_name='mymodel-detail',
+ lookup_field='uuid'
+ )
+
+ class Meta:
+ model = MyModel
+ fields = ['url', 'email', 'notes', 'is_admin']
+
+With ModelSerializer
you can now specify field names in the fields
option that refer to model methods or properties. For example, suppose you have the following model:
class Invitation(models.Model):
+ created = models.DateTimeField()
+ to_email = models.EmailField()
+ message = models.CharField(max_length=1000)
+
+ def expiry_date(self):
+ return self.created + datetime.timedelta(days=30)
+
+You can include expiry_date
as a field option on a ModelSerializer
class.
class InvitationSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+ class Meta:
+ model = Invitation
+ fields = ['to_email', 'message', 'expiry_date']
+
+These fields will be mapped to serializers.ReadOnlyField()
instances.
>>> serializer = InvitationSerializer()
+>>> print(repr(serializer))
+InvitationSerializer():
+ to_email = EmailField(max_length=75)
+ message = CharField(max_length=1000)
+ expiry_date = ReadOnlyField()
+
+ListSerializer
class.The ListSerializer
class has now been added, and allows you to create base serializer classes for only accepting multiple inputs.
class MultipleUserSerializer(ListSerializer):
+ child = UserSerializer()
+
+You can also still use the many=True
argument to serializer classes. It's worth noting that many=True
argument transparently creates a ListSerializer
instance, allowing the validation logic for list and non-list data to be cleanly separated in the REST framework codebase.
You will typically want to continue to use the existing many=True
flag rather than declaring ListSerializer
classes explicitly, but declaring the classes explicitly can be useful if you need to write custom create
or update
methods for bulk updates, or provide for other custom behavior.
See also the new ListField
class, which validates input in the same way, but does not include the serializer interfaces of .is_valid()
, .data
, .save()
and so on.
BaseSerializer
class.REST framework now includes a simple BaseSerializer
class that can be used to easily support alternative serialization and deserialization styles.
This class implements the same basic API as the Serializer
class:
.data
- Returns the outgoing primitive representation..is_valid()
- Deserializes and validates incoming data..validated_data
- Returns the validated incoming data..errors
- Returns an errors during validation..save()
- Persists the validated data into an object instance.There are four methods that can be overridden, depending on what functionality you want the serializer class to support:
+.to_representation()
- Override this to support serialization, for read operations..to_internal_value()
- Override this to support deserialization, for write operations..create()
and .update()
- Override either or both of these to support saving instances.Because this class provides the same interface as the Serializer
class, you can use it with the existing generic class-based views exactly as you would for a regular Serializer
or ModelSerializer
.
The only difference you'll notice when doing so is the BaseSerializer
classes will not generate HTML forms in the browsable API. This is because the data they return does not include all the field information that would allow each field to be rendered into a suitable HTML input.
BaseSerializer
classes.To implement a read-only serializer using the BaseSerializer
class, we just need to override the .to_representation()
method. Let's take a look at an example using a simple Django model:
class HighScore(models.Model):
+ created = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True)
+ player_name = models.CharField(max_length=10)
+ score = models.IntegerField()
+
+It's simple to create a read-only serializer for converting HighScore
instances into primitive data types.
class HighScoreSerializer(serializers.BaseSerializer):
+ def to_representation(self, obj):
+ return {
+ 'score': obj.score,
+ 'player_name': obj.player_name
+ }
+
+We can now use this class to serialize single HighScore
instances:
@api_view(['GET'])
+def high_score(request, pk):
+ instance = HighScore.objects.get(pk=pk)
+ serializer = HighScoreSerializer(instance)
+ return Response(serializer.data)
+
+Or use it to serialize multiple instances:
+@api_view(['GET'])
+def all_high_scores(request):
+ queryset = HighScore.objects.order_by('-score')
+ serializer = HighScoreSerializer(queryset, many=True)
+ return Response(serializer.data)
+
+BaseSerializer
classes.To create a read-write serializer we first need to implement a .to_internal_value()
method. This method returns the validated values that will be used to construct the object instance, and may raise a ValidationError
if the supplied data is in an incorrect format.
Once you've implemented .to_internal_value()
, the basic validation API will be available on the serializer, and you will be able to use .is_valid()
, .validated_data
and .errors
.
If you want to also support .save()
you'll need to also implement either or both of the .create()
and .update()
methods.
Here's a complete example of our previous HighScoreSerializer
, that's been updated to support both read and write operations.
class HighScoreSerializer(serializers.BaseSerializer):
+ def to_internal_value(self, data):
+ score = data.get('score')
+ player_name = data.get('player_name')
+
+ # Perform the data validation.
+ if not score:
+ raise ValidationError({
+ 'score': 'This field is required.'
+ })
+ if not player_name:
+ raise ValidationError({
+ 'player_name': 'This field is required.'
+ })
+ if len(player_name) > 10:
+ raise ValidationError({
+ 'player_name': 'May not be more than 10 characters.'
+ })
+
+ # Return the validated values. This will be available as
+ # the `.validated_data` property.
+ return {
+ 'score': int(score),
+ 'player_name': player_name
+ }
+
+ def to_representation(self, obj):
+ return {
+ 'score': obj.score,
+ 'player_name': obj.player_name
+ }
+
+ def create(self, validated_data):
+ return HighScore.objects.create(**validated_data)
+
+BaseSerializer
.The BaseSerializer
class is also useful if you want to implement new generic serializer classes for dealing with particular serialization styles, or for integrating with alternative storage backends.
The following class is an example of a generic serializer that can handle coercing arbitrary objects into primitive representations.
+class ObjectSerializer(serializers.BaseSerializer):
+ """
+ A read-only serializer that coerces arbitrary complex objects
+ into primitive representations.
+ """
+ def to_representation(self, obj):
+ for attribute_name in dir(obj):
+ attribute = getattr(obj, attribute_name)
+ if attribute_name.startswith('_'):
+ # Ignore private attributes.
+ pass
+ elif hasattr(attribute, '__call__'):
+ # Ignore methods and other callables.
+ pass
+ elif isinstance(attribute, (str, int, bool, float, type(None))):
+ # Primitive types can be passed through unmodified.
+ output[attribute_name] = attribute
+ elif isinstance(attribute, list):
+ # Recursively deal with items in lists.
+ output[attribute_name] = [
+ self.to_representation(item) for item in attribute
+ ]
+ elif isinstance(attribute, dict):
+ # Recursively deal with items in dictionaries.
+ output[attribute_name] = {
+ str(key): self.to_representation(value)
+ for key, value in attribute.items()
+ }
+ else:
+ # Force anything else to its string representation.
+ output[attribute_name] = str(attribute)
+
+Field
and ReadOnly
field classes.There are some minor tweaks to the field base classes.
+Previously we had these two base classes:
+Field
as the base class for read-only fields. A default implementation was included for serializing data.WritableField
as the base class for read-write fields.We now use the following:
+Field
is the base class for all fields. It does not include any default implementation for either serializing or deserializing data.ReadOnlyField
is a concrete implementation for read-only fields that simply returns the attribute value without modification.required
, allow_null
, allow_blank
and default
arguments.REST framework now has more explicit and clear control over validating empty values for fields.
+Previously the meaning of the required=False
keyword argument was underspecified. In practice its use meant that a field could either be not included in the input, or it could be included, but be None
or the empty string.
We now have a better separation, with separate required
, allow_null
and allow_blank
arguments.
The following set of arguments are used to control validation of empty values:
+required=False
: The value does not need to be present in the input, and will not be passed to .create()
or .update()
if it is not seen.default=<value>
: The value does not need to be present in the input, and a default value will be passed to .create()
or .update()
if it is not seen.allow_null=True
: None
is a valid input.allow_blank=True
: ''
is valid input. For CharField
and subclasses only.Typically you'll want to use required=False
if the corresponding model field has a default value, and additionally set either allow_null=True
or allow_blank=True
if required.
The default
argument is also available and always implies that the field is not required to be in the input. It is unnecessary to use the required
argument when a default is specified, and doing so will result in an error.
The previous field implementations did not forcibly coerce returned values into the correct type in many cases. For example, an IntegerField
would return a string output if the attribute value was a string. We now more strictly coerce to the correct return type, leading to more constrained and expected behavior.
.validate()
.The .validate()
method is now removed from field classes. This method was in any case undocumented and not public API. You should instead simply override to_internal_value()
.
class UppercaseCharField(serializers.CharField):
+ def to_internal_value(self, data):
+ value = super(UppercaseCharField, self).to_internal_value(data)
+ if value != value.upper():
+ raise serializers.ValidationError('The input should be uppercase only.')
+ return value
+
+Previously validation errors could be raised in either .to_native()
or .validate()
, making it non-obvious which should be used. Providing only a single point of API ensures more repetition and reinforcement of the core API.
ListField
class.The ListField
class has now been added. This field validates list input. It takes a child
keyword argument which is used to specify the field used to validate each item in the list. For example:
scores = ListField(child=IntegerField(min_value=0, max_value=100))
+
+You can also use a declarative style to create new subclasses of ListField
, like this:
class ScoresField(ListField):
+ child = IntegerField(min_value=0, max_value=100)
+
+We can now use the ScoresField
class inside another serializer:
scores = ScoresField()
+
+See also the new ListSerializer
class, which validates input in the same way, but also includes the serializer interfaces of .is_valid()
, .data
, .save()
and so on.
ChoiceField
class may now accept a flat list.The ChoiceField
class may now accept a list of choices in addition to the existing style of using a list of pairs of (name, display_value)
. The following is now valid:
color = ChoiceField(choices=['red', 'green', 'blue'])
+
+MultipleChoiceField
class.The MultipleChoiceField
class has been added. This field acts like ChoiceField
, but returns a set, which may include none, one or many of the valid choices.
The from_native(self, value)
and to_native(self, data)
method names have been replaced with the more obviously named to_internal_value(self, data)
and to_representation(self, value)
.
The field_from_native()
and field_to_native()
methods are removed. Previously you could use these methods if you wanted to customise the behaviour in a way that did not simply lookup the field value from the object. For example...
def field_to_native(self, obj, field_name):
+ """A custom read-only field that returns the class name."""
+ return obj.__class__.__name__
+
+Now if you need to access the entire object you'll instead need to override one or both of the following:
+get_attribute
to modify the attribute value passed to to_representation()
.get_value
to modify the data value passed to_internal_value()
.For example:
+def get_attribute(self, obj):
+ # Pass the entire object through to `to_representation()`,
+ # instead of the standard attribute lookup.
+ return obj
+
+def to_representation(self, value):
+ return value.__class__.__name__
+
+queryset
required on relational fields.Previously relational fields that were explicitly declared on a serializer class could omit the queryset argument if (and only if) they were declared on a ModelSerializer
.
This code would be valid in 2.4.3
:
class AccountSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+ organizations = serializers.SlugRelatedField(slug_field='name')
+
+ class Meta:
+ model = Account
+
+However this code would not be valid in 3.0
:
# Missing `queryset`
+class AccountSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
+ organizations = serializers.SlugRelatedField(slug_field='name')
+
+ def restore_object(self, attrs, instance=None):
+ # ...
+
+The queryset argument is now always required for writable relational fields.
+This removes some magic and makes it easier and more obvious to move between implicit ModelSerializer
classes and explicit Serializer
classes.
class AccountSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+ organizations = serializers.SlugRelatedField(
+ slug_field='name',
+ queryset=Organization.objects.all()
+ )
+
+ class Meta:
+ model = Account
+
+The queryset
argument is only ever required for writable fields, and is not required or valid for fields with read_only=True
.
SerializerMethodField
.The argument to SerializerMethodField
is now optional, and defaults to get_<field_name>
. For example the following is valid:
class AccountSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
+ # `method_name='get_billing_details'` by default.
+ billing_details = serializers.SerializerMethodField()
+
+ def get_billing_details(self, account):
+ return calculate_billing(account)
+
+In order to ensure a consistent code style an assertion error will be raised if you include a redundant method name argument that matches the default method name. For example, the following code will raise an error:
+billing_details = serializers.SerializerMethodField('get_billing_details')
+
+source
usage.I've see several codebases that unnecessarily include the source
argument, setting it to the same value as the field name. This usage is redundant and confusing, making it less obvious that source
is usually not required.
The following usage will now raise an error:
+email = serializers.EmailField(source='email')
+
+UniqueValidator
and UniqueTogetherValidator
classes.REST framework now provides new validators that allow you to ensure field uniqueness, while still using a completely explicit Serializer
class instead of using ModelSerializer
.
The UniqueValidator
should be applied to a serializer field, and takes a single queryset
argument.
from rest_framework import serializers
+from rest_framework.validators import UniqueValidator
+
+class OrganizationSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
+ url = serializers.HyperlinkedIdentityField(view_name='organization_detail')
+ created = serializers.DateTimeField(read_only=True)
+ name = serializers.CharField(
+ max_length=100,
+ validators=UniqueValidator(queryset=Organization.objects.all())
+ )
+
+The UniqueTogetherValidator
should be applied to a serializer, and takes a queryset
argument and a fields
argument which should be a list or tuple of field names.
class RaceResultSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
+ category = serializers.ChoiceField(['5k', '10k'])
+ position = serializers.IntegerField()
+ name = serializers.CharField(max_length=100)
+
+ class Meta:
+ validators = [UniqueTogetherValidator(
+ queryset=RaceResult.objects.all(),
+ fields=['category', 'position']
+ )]
+
+UniqueForDateValidator
classes.REST framework also now includes explicit validator classes for validating the unique_for_date
, unique_for_month
, and unique_for_year
model field constraints. These are used internally instead of calling into Model.full_clean()
.
These classes are documented in the Validators section of the documentation.
+The view logic for the default method handlers has been significantly simplified, due to the new serializers API.
+The pre_save
and post_save
hooks no longer exist, but are replaced with perform_create(self, serializer)
and perform_update(self, serializer)
.
These methods should save the object instance by calling serializer.save()
, adding in any additional arguments as required. They may also perform any custom pre-save or post-save behavior.
For example:
+def perform_create(self, serializer):
+ # Include the owner attribute directly, rather than from request data.
+ instance = serializer.save(owner=self.request.user)
+ # Perform a custom post-save action.
+ send_email(instance.to_email, instance.message)
+
+The pre_delete
and post_delete
hooks no longer exist, and are replaced with .perform_destroy(self, instance)
, which should delete the instance and perform any custom actions.
def perform_destroy(self, instance):
+ # Perform a custom pre-delete action.
+ send_deletion_alert(user=instance.created_by, deleted=instance)
+ # Delete the object instance.
+ instance.delete()
+
+The .object
and .object_list
attributes are no longer set on the view instance. Treating views as mutable object instances that store state during the processing of the view tends to be poor design, and can lead to obscure flow logic.
I would personally recommend that developers treat view instances as immutable objects in their application code.
+Allowing PUT
as create operations is problematic, as it necessarily exposes information about the existence or non-existence of objects. It's also not obvious that transparently allowing re-creating of previously deleted instances is necessarily a better default behavior than simply returning 404
responses.
Both styles "PUT
as 404" and "PUT
as create" can be valid in different circumstances, but we've now opted for the 404 behavior as the default, due to it being simpler and more obvious.
If you need to restore the previous behavior you may want to include this AllowPUTAsCreateMixin
class as a mixin to your views.
The generic views now raise ValidationFailed
exception for invalid data. This exception is then dealt with by the exception handler, rather than the view returning a 400 Bad Request
response directly.
This change means that you can now easily customize the style of error responses across your entire API, without having to modify any of the generic views.
+Behavior for dealing with OPTIONS
requests was previously built directly into the class-based views. This has now been properly separated out into a Metadata API that allows the same pluggable style as other API policies in REST framework.
This makes it far easier to use a different style for OPTIONS
responses throughout your API, and makes it possible to create third-party metadata policies.
REST framework 3.0 includes templated HTML form rendering for serializers.
+This API should not yet be considered finalized, and will only be promoted to public API for the 3.1 release.
+Significant changes that you do need to be aware of include:
+UserSerializer
with a nested ProfileSerializer
will now render a nested fieldset
when used in the browsable API.widget
option is no longer available for serializer fields. You can instead control the template that is used for a given field, by using the style
dictionary.style
keyword argument for serializer fields.The style
keyword argument can be used to pass through additional information from a serializer field, to the renderer class. In particular, the HTMLFormRenderer
uses the base_template
key to determine which template to render the field with.
For example, to use a textarea
control instead of the default input
control, you would use the following…
additional_notes = serializers.CharField(
+ style={'base_template': 'textarea.html'}
+)
+
+Similarly, to use a radio button control instead of the default select
control, you would use the following…
color_channel = serializers.ChoiceField(
+ choices=['red', 'blue', 'green'],
+ style={'base_template': 'radio.html'}
+)
+
+This API should be considered provisional, and there may be minor alterations with the incoming 3.1 release.
+There are some improvements in the default style we use in our API responses.
+Unicode JSON is now the default. The UnicodeJSONRenderer
class no longer exists, and the UNICODE_JSON
setting has been added. To revert this behavior use the new setting:
REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ 'UNICODE_JSON': False
+}
+
+We now output compact JSON in responses by default. For example, we return:
+{"email":"amy@example.com","is_admin":true}
+
+Instead of the following:
+{"email": "amy@example.com", "is_admin": true}
+
+The COMPACT_JSON
setting has been added, and can be used to revert this behavior if needed:
REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ 'COMPACT_JSON': False
+}
+
+The FileField
and ImageField
classes are now represented as URLs by default. You should ensure you set Django's standard MEDIA_URL
setting appropriately, and ensure your application serves the uploaded files.
You can revert this behavior, and display filenames in the representation by using the UPLOADED_FILES_USE_URL
settings key:
REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ 'UPLOADED_FILES_USE_URL': False
+}
+
+You can also modify serializer fields individually, using the use_url
argument:
uploaded_file = serializers.FileField(use_url=False)
+
+Also note that you should pass the request
object to the serializer as context when instantiating it, so that a fully qualified URL can be returned. Returned URLs will then be of the form https://example.com/url_path/filename.txt
. For example:
context = {'request': request}
+serializer = ExampleSerializer(instance, context=context)
+return Response(serializer.data)
+
+If the request is omitted from the context, the returned URLs will be of the form /url_path/filename.txt
.
Retry-After
.The custom X-Throttle-Wait-Second
header has now been dropped in favor of the standard Retry-After
header. You can revert this behavior if needed by writing a custom exception handler for your application.
Date and Time objects are now coerced to strings by default in the serializer output. Previously they were returned as Date
, Time
and DateTime
objects, and later coerced to strings by the renderer.
You can modify this behavior globally by settings the existing DATE_FORMAT
, DATETIME_FORMAT
and TIME_FORMAT
settings keys. Setting these values to None
instead of their default value of 'iso-8601'
will result in native objects being returned in serializer data.
REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ # Return native `Date` and `Time` objects in `serializer.data`
+ 'DATETIME_FORMAT': None
+ 'DATE_FORMAT': None
+ 'TIME_FORMAT': None
+}
+
+You can also modify serializer fields individually, using the date_format
, time_format
and datetime_format
arguments:
# Return `DateTime` instances in `serializer.data`, not strings.
+created = serializers.DateTimeField(format=None)
+
+Decimals are now coerced to strings by default in the serializer output. Previously they were returned as Decimal
objects, and later coerced to strings by the renderer.
You can modify this behavior globally by using the COERCE_DECIMAL_TO_STRING
settings key.
REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ 'COERCE_DECIMAL_TO_STRING': False
+}
+
+Or modify it on an individual serializer field, using the coerce_to_string
keyword argument.
# Return `Decimal` instances in `serializer.data`, not strings.
+amount = serializers.DecimalField(
+ max_digits=10,
+ decimal_places=2,
+ coerce_to_string=False
+)
+
+The default JSON renderer will return float objects for un-coerced Decimal
instances. This allows you to easily switch between string or float representations for decimals depending on your API design needs.
ChoiceField
does not currently display nested choices, as was the case in 2.4. This will be address as part of 3.1.APIException
subclasses could previously take any arbitrary type in the detail
argument. These exceptions now use translatable text strings, and as a result call force_text
on the detail
argument, which must be a string. If you need complex arguments to an APIException
class, you should subclass it and override the __init__()
method. Typically you'll instead want to use a custom exception handler to provide for non-standard error responses.3.0 is an incremental release, and there are several upcoming features that will build on the baseline improvements that it makes.
+The 3.1 release is planned to address improvements in the following components:
+The 3.2 release is planned to introduce an alternative admin-style interface to the browsable API.
+You can follow development on the GitHub site, where we use milestones to indicate planning timescales.
+ + +The 3.1 release is an intermediate step in the Kickstarter project releases, and includes a range of new functionality.
+Some highlights include:
+HStoreField
and ArrayField
.The pagination API has been improved, making it both easier to use, and more powerful.
+A guide to the headline features follows. For full details, see the pagination documentation.
+Note that as a result of this work a number of settings keys and generic view attributes are now moved to pending deprecation. Controlling pagination styles is now largely handled by overriding a pagination class and modifying its configuration attributes.
+PAGINATE_BY
settings key will continue to work but is now pending deprecation. The more obviously named PAGE_SIZE
settings key should now be used instead.PAGINATE_BY_PARAM
, MAX_PAGINATE_BY
settings keys will continue to work but are now pending deprecation, in favor of setting configuration attributes on the configured pagination class.paginate_by
, page_query_param
, paginate_by_param
and max_paginate_by
generic view attributes will continue to work but are now pending deprecation, in favor of setting configuration attributes on the configured pagination class.pagination_serializer_class
view attribute and DEFAULT_PAGINATION_SERIALIZER_CLASS
settings key are no longer valid. The pagination API does not use serializers to determine the output format, and you'll need to instead override the get_paginated_response
method on a pagination class in order to specify how the output format is controlled.Until now, there has only been a single built-in pagination style in REST framework. We now have page, limit/offset and cursor based schemes included by default.
+The cursor based pagination scheme is particularly smart, and is a better approach for clients iterating through large or frequently changing result sets. The scheme supports paging against non-unique indexes, by using both cursor and limit/offset information. It also allows for both forward and reverse cursor pagination. Much credit goes to David Cramer for this blog post on the subject.
+Paginated results now include controls that render directly in the browsable API. If you're using the page or limit/offset style, then you'll see a page based control displayed in the browsable API:
+ +The cursor based pagination renders a more simple style of control:
+ +The pagination API was previously only able to alter the pagination style in the body of the response. The API now supports being able to write pagination information in response headers, making it possible to use pagination schemes that use the Link
or Content-Range
headers.
For more information, see the custom pagination styles documentation.
+We've made it easier to build versioned APIs. Built-in schemes for versioning include both URL based and Accept header based variations.
+When using a URL based scheme, hyperlinked serializers will resolve relationships to the same API version as used on the incoming request.
+For example, when using NamespaceVersioning
, and the following hyperlinked serializer:
class AccountsSerializer(serializer.HyperlinkedModelSerializer):
+ class Meta:
+ model = Accounts
+ fields = ['account_name', 'users']
+
+The output representation would match the version used on the incoming request. Like so:
+GET http://example.org/v2/accounts/10 # Version 'v2'
+
+{
+ "account_name": "europa",
+ "users": [
+ "http://example.org/v2/users/12", # Version 'v2'
+ "http://example.org/v2/users/54",
+ "http://example.org/v2/users/87"
+ ]
+}
+
+REST framework now includes a built-in set of translations, and supports internationalized error responses. This allows you to either change the default language, or to allow clients to specify the language via the Accept-Language
header.
You can change the default language by using the standard Django LANGUAGE_CODE
setting:
LANGUAGE_CODE = "es-es"
+
+You can turn on per-request language requests by adding LocalMiddleware
to your MIDDLEWARE_CLASSES
setting:
MIDDLEWARE_CLASSES = [
+ ...
+ 'django.middleware.locale.LocaleMiddleware'
+]
+
+When per-request internationalization is enabled, client requests will respect the Accept-Language
header where possible. For example, let's make a request for an unsupported media type:
Request
+GET /api/users HTTP/1.1
+Accept: application/xml
+Accept-Language: es-es
+Host: example.org
+
+Response
+HTTP/1.0 406 NOT ACCEPTABLE
+
+{
+ "detail": "No se ha podido satisfacer la solicitud de cabecera de Accept."
+}
+
+Note that the structure of the error responses is still the same. We still have a detail
key in the response. If needed you can modify this behavior too, by using a custom exception handler.
We include built-in translations both for standard exception cases, and for serializer validation errors.
+The full list of supported languages can be found on our Transifex project page.
+If you only wish to support a subset of the supported languages, use Django's standard LANGUAGES
setting:
LANGUAGES = [
+ ('de', _('German')),
+ ('en', _('English')),
+]
+
+For more details, see the internationalization documentation.
+Many thanks to Craig Blaszczyk for helping push this through.
+Django 1.8's new ArrayField
, HStoreField
and UUIDField
are now all fully supported.
This work also means that we now have both serializers.DictField()
, and serializers.ListField()
types, allowing you to express and validate a wider set of representations.
If you're building a new 1.8 project, then you should probably consider using UUIDField
as the primary keys for all your models. This style will work automatically with hyperlinked serializers, returning URLs in the following style:
http://example.org/api/purchases/9b1a433f-e90d-4948-848b-300fdc26365d
+
+The serializer redesign in 3.0 did not include any public API for modifying how ModelSerializer classes automatically generate a set of fields from a given mode class. We've now re-introduced an API for this, allowing you to create new ModelSerializer base classes that behave differently, such as using a different default style for relationships.
+For more information, see the documentation on customizing field mappings for ModelSerializer classes.
+We've now moved a number of packages out of the core of REST framework, and into separately installable packages. If you're currently using these you don't need to worry, you simply need to pip install
the new packages, and change any import paths.
We're making this change in order to help distribute the maintenance workload, and keep better focus of the core essentials of the framework.
+The change also means we can be more flexible with which external packages we recommend. For example, the excellently maintained Django OAuth toolkit has now been promoted as our recommended option for integrating OAuth support.
+The following packages are now moved out of core and should be separately installed:
+It's worth reiterating that this change in policy shouldn't mean any work in your codebase other than adding a new requirement and modifying some import paths. For example to install XML rendering, you would now do:
+pip install djangorestframework-xml
+
+And modify your settings, like so:
+REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ 'DEFAULT_RENDERER_CLASSES': [
+ 'rest_framework.renderers.JSONRenderer',
+ 'rest_framework.renderers.BrowsableAPIRenderer',
+ 'rest_framework_xml.renderers.XMLRenderer'
+ ]
+}
+
+Thanks go to the latest member of our maintenance team, José Padilla, for handling this work and taking on ownership of these packages.
+The request.DATA
, request.FILES
and request.QUERY_PARAMS
attributes move from pending deprecation, to deprecated. Use request.data
and request.query_params
instead, as discussed in the 3.0 release notes.
The ModelSerializer Meta options for write_only_fields
, view_name
and lookup_field
are also moved from pending deprecation, to deprecated. Use extra_kwargs
instead, as discussed in the 3.0 release notes.
All these attributes and options will still work in 3.1, but their usage will raise a warning. They will be fully removed in 3.2.
+The next focus will be on HTML renderings of API output and will include:
+This will either be made as a single 3.2 release, or split across two separate releases, with the HTML forms and filter controls coming in 3.2, and the admin-style interface coming in a 3.3 release.
+ + +The 3.10 release drops support for Python 2.
+Since we first introduced schema support in Django REST Framework 3.5, OpenAPI has emerged as the widely adopted standard for modeling Web APIs.
+This release begins the deprecation process for the CoreAPI based schema generation, and introduces OpenAPI schema generation in its place.
+If you're currently using the CoreAPI schemas, you'll need to make sure to
+update your REST framework settings to include DEFAULT_SCHEMA_CLASS
explicitly.
settings.py:
+REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ ...
+ 'DEFAULT_SCHEMA_CLASS': 'rest_framework.schemas.coreapi.AutoSchema'
+}
+
+
+You'll still be able to keep using CoreAPI schemas, API docs, and client for the +foreseeable future. We'll aim to ensure that the CoreAPI schema generator remains +available as a third party package, even once it has eventually been removed +from REST framework, scheduled for version 3.12.
+We have removed the old documentation for the CoreAPI based schema generation. +You may view the Legacy CoreAPI documentation here.
+You can generate a static OpenAPI schema, using the generateschema
management
+command.
Alternately, to have the project serve an API schema, use the get_schema_view()
+shortcut.
In your urls.py
:
from rest_framework.schemas import get_schema_view
+
+urlpatterns = [
+ # ...
+ # Use the `get_schema_view()` helper to add a `SchemaView` to project URLs.
+ # * `title` and `description` parameters are passed to `SchemaGenerator`.
+ # * Provide view name for use with `reverse()`.
+ path('openapi', get_schema_view(
+ title="Your Project",
+ description="API for all things …"
+ ), name='openapi-schema'),
+ # ...
+]
+
+
+For customizations that you want to apply across the entire API, you can subclass rest_framework.schemas.openapi.SchemaGenerator
and provide it as an argument
+to the generateschema
command or get_schema_view()
helper function.
For specific per-view customizations, you can subclass AutoSchema
,
+making sure to set schema = <YourCustomClass>
on the view.
For more details, see the API Schema documentation.
+There are some great third party options for documenting your API, based on the +OpenAPI schema.
+See the Documenting you API section for more details.
+Given that our OpenAPI schema generation is a new feature, it's likely that there +will still be some iterative improvements for us to make. There will be two +main cases here:
+We'll aim to bring the first type of change quickly in point releases. For the +second kind we'd like to adopt a slower approach, to make sure we keep the API +simple, and as widely applicable as possible, before we bring in API changes.
+It's also possible that we'll end up implementing API documentation and API client
+tooling that are driven by the OpenAPI schema. The apistar
project has a
+significant amount of work towards this. However, if we do so, we'll plan
+on keeping any tooling outside of the core framework.
REST framework is a collaboratively funded project. If you use +REST framework commercially we strongly encourage you to invest in its +continued development by signing up for a paid plan.
+Every single sign-up helps us make REST framework long-term financially sustainable.
+ + + + +Many thanks to all our wonderful sponsors, and in particular to our premium backers, Sentry, Stream, ESG, Rollbar, Cadre, Kloudless, and Lights On Software.
+ + +The 3.11 release adds support for Django 3.0.
+This release will be the last to support Python 3.5 or Django 1.11.
+The OpenAPI schema generation continues to mature. Some highlights in 3.11 +include:
+In this example view operation descriptions for the get
and post
methods will
+be extracted from the class docstring:
class DocStringExampleListView(APIView):
+"""
+get: A description of my GET operation.
+post: A description of my POST operation.
+"""
+ permission_classes = [permissions.IsAuthenticatedOrReadOnly]
+
+ def get(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
+ ...
+
+ def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
+ ...
+
+
+In some circumstances a Validator class or a Default class may need to access the serializer field with which it is called, or the .context
with which the serializer was instantiated. In particular:
CurrentUserDefault
needs to be able to determine the context with which the serializer was instantiated, in order to return the current user instance.Previous our approach to this was that implementations could include a set_context
method, which would be called prior to validation. However this approach had issues with potential race conditions. We have now move this approach into a pending deprecation state. It will continue to function, but will be escalated to a deprecated state in 3.12, and removed entirely in 3.13.
Instead, validators or defaults which require the serializer context, should include a requires_context = True
attribute on the class.
The __call__
method should then include an additional serializer_field
argument.
Validator implementations will look like this:
+class CustomValidator:
+ requires_context = True
+
+ def __call__(self, value, serializer_field):
+ ...
+
+
+Default implementations will look like this:
+class CustomDefault:
+ requires_context = True
+
+ def __call__(self, serializer_field):
+ ...
+
+
+REST framework is a collaboratively funded project. If you use +REST framework commercially we strongly encourage you to invest in its +continued development by signing up for a paid plan.
+Every single sign-up helps us make REST framework long-term financially sustainable.
+ + + + +Many thanks to all our wonderful sponsors, and in particular to our premium backers, Sentry, Stream, ESG, Rollbar, Cadre, Kloudless, Lights On Software, and Retool.
+ + +The 3.2 release is the first version to include an admin interface for the browsable API.
+ +This interface is intended to act as a more user-friendly interface to the API. It can be used either as a replacement to the existing BrowsableAPIRenderer
, or used together with it, allowing you to switch between the two styles as required.
We've also fixed a huge number of issues, and made numerous cleanups and improvements.
+Over the course of the 3.1.x series we've resolved nearly 600 tickets on our GitHub issue tracker. This means we're currently running at a rate of closing around 100 issues or pull requests per month.
+None of this would have been possible without the support of our wonderful Kickstarter backers. If you're looking for a job in Django development we'd strongly recommend taking a look through our sponsors and finding out who's hiring.
+To include AdminRenderer
simply add it to your settings:
REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ 'DEFAULT_RENDERER_CLASSES': [
+ 'rest_framework.renderers.JSONRenderer',
+ 'rest_framework.renderers.AdminRenderer',
+ 'rest_framework.renderers.BrowsableAPIRenderer'
+ ],
+ 'DEFAULT_PAGINATION_CLASS': 'rest_framework.pagination.PageNumberPagination',
+ 'PAGE_SIZE': 100
+}
+
+There are some limitations to the AdminRenderer
, in particular it is not yet able to handle list or dictionary inputs, as we do not have any HTML form fields that support those.
Also note that this is an initial release and we do not yet have a public API for modifying the behavior or documentation on overriding the templates.
+The idea is to get this released to users early, so we can start getting feedback and release a more fully featured version in 3.3.
+This release drops support for Django 1.4.
+Our supported Django versions are now 1.5.6+, 1.6.3+, 1.7 and 1.8.
+There are no new deprecations in 3.2, although a number of existing deprecations have now escalated in line with our deprecation policy.
+request.DATA
was put on the deprecation path in 3.0. It has now been removed and its usage will result in an error. Use the more pythonic style of request.data
instead.request.QUERY_PARAMS
was put on the deprecation path in 3.0. It has now been removed and its usage will result in an error. Use the more pythonic style of request.query_params
instead.ModelSerializer.Meta
options have now been removed: write_only_fields
, view_name
, lookup_field
. Use the more general extra_kwargs
option instead.The following pagination view attributes and settings have been moved into attributes on the pagination class since 3.1. Their usage was formerly in 'pending deprecation', and has now escalated to 'deprecated'. They will continue to function but will raise errors.
+view.paginate_by
- Use paginator.page_size
instead.view.page_query_param
- Use paginator.page_query_param
instead.view.paginate_by_param
- Use paginator.page_size_query_param
instead.view.max_paginate_by
- Use paginator.max_page_size
instead.settings.PAGINATE_BY
- Use paginator.page_size
instead.settings.PAGINATE_BY_PARAM
- Use paginator.page_size_query_param
instead.settings.MAX_PAGINATE_BY
- Use paginator.max_page_size
instead.There are a couple of bug fixes that are worth calling out as they introduce differing behavior.
+These are a little subtle and probably won't affect most users, but are worth understanding before upgrading your project.
+We've now added an allow_empty
argument, which can be used with ListSerializer
, or with many=True
relationships. This is True
by default, but can be set to False
if you want to disallow empty lists as valid input.
As a follow-up to this we are now able to properly mirror the behavior of Django's ModelForm
with respect to how many-to-many fields are validated.
Previously a many-to-many field on a model would map to a serializer field that would allow either empty or non-empty list inputs. Now, a many-to-many field will map to a serializer field that requires at least one input, unless the model field has blank=True
set.
Here's what the mapping looks like in practice:
+models.ManyToManyField()
→ serializers.PrimaryKeyRelatedField(many=True, allow_empty=False)
models.ManyToManyField(blank=True)
→ serializers.PrimaryKeyRelatedField(many=True)
The upshot is this: If you have many to many fields in your models, then make sure you've included the argument blank=True
if you want to allow empty inputs in the equivalent ModelSerializer
fields.
When using allow_null
with ListField
or a nested many=True
serializer the previous behavior was to allow null
values as items in the list. The behavior is now to allow null
values instead of the list.
For example, take the following field:
+NestedSerializer(many=True, allow_null=True)
+
+Previously the validation behavior would be:
+[{…}, null, {…}]
is valid.null
is invalid.Our validation behavior as of 3.2.0 is now:
+[{…}, null, {…}]
is invalid.null
is valid.If you want to allow null
child items, you'll need to instead specify allow_null
on the child class, using an explicit ListField
instead of many=True
. For example:
ListField(child=NestedSerializer(allow_null=True))
+
+The 3.3 release is currently planned for the start of October, and will be the last Kickstarter-funded release.
+This release is planned to include:
+Thanks once again to all our sponsors and supporters.
+ + +The 3.3 release marks the final work in the Kickstarter funded series. We'd like to offer a final resounding thank you to all our wonderful sponsors and supporters.
+The amount of work that has been achieved as a direct result of the funding is immense. We've added a huge amounts of new functionality, resolved nearly 2,000 tickets, and redesigned & refined large parts of the project.
+In order to continue driving REST framework forward, we'll shortly be announcing a new set of funding plans. Follow @_tomchristie to keep up to date with these announcements, and be among the first set of sign ups.
+We strongly believe that collaboratively funded software development yields outstanding results for a relatively low investment-per-head. If you or your company use REST framework commercially, then we would strongly urge you to participate in this latest funding drive, and help us continue to build an increasingly polished & professional product.
+Significant new functionality in the 3.3 release includes:
+JSONField
serializer field, corresponding to Django 1.9's Postgres JSONField
model field.Example of the new filter controls
+This release drops support for Django 1.5 and 1.6. Django 1.7, 1.8 or 1.9 are now required.
+This brings our supported versions into line with Django's currently supported versions
+The AJAX based support for the browsable API means that there are a number of internal cleanups in the request
class. For the vast majority of developers this should largely remain transparent:
PUT
and DELETE
, or to support form content types such as JSON, you should now use the AJAX forms javascript library. This replaces the previous 'method and content type overloading' that required significant internal complexity to the request class.accept
query parameter is no longer supported by the default content negotiation class. If you require it then you'll need to use a custom content negotiation class.HTTP_X_HTTP_METHOD_OVERRIDE
header is no longer supported by default. If you require it then you'll need to use custom middleware.The following pagination view attributes and settings have been moved into attributes on the pagination class since 3.1. Their usage was formerly deprecated, and has now been removed entirely, in line with the deprecation policy.
+view.paginate_by
- Use paginator.page_size
instead.view.page_query_param
- Use paginator.page_query_param
instead.view.paginate_by_param
- Use paginator.page_size_query_param
instead.view.max_paginate_by
- Use paginator.max_page_size
instead.settings.PAGINATE_BY
- Use paginator.page_size
instead.settings.PAGINATE_BY_PARAM
- Use paginator.page_size_query_param
instead.settings.MAX_PAGINATE_BY
- Use paginator.max_page_size
instead.The ModelSerializer
and HyperlinkedModelSerializer
classes should now include either a fields
or exclude
option, although the fields = '__all__'
shortcut may be used. Failing to include either of these two options is currently pending deprecation, and will be removed entirely in the 3.5 release. This behavior brings ModelSerializer
more closely in line with Django's ModelForm
behavior.
The 3.4 release is the first in a planned series that will be addressing schema +generation, hypermedia support, API clients, and finally realtime support.
+The 3.4 release has been made possible a recent Mozilla grant, and by our +collaborative funding model. If you use REST framework commercially, and would +like to see this work continue, we strongly encourage you to invest in its +continued development by signing up for a paid plan.
+The initial aim is to provide a single full-time position on REST framework. +Right now we're over 60% of the way towards achieving that. +Every single sign-up makes a significant impact.
+ + + + +Many thanks to all our awesome sponsors, and in particular to our premium backers, Rover, Sentry, and Stream.
+REST framework 3.4 brings built-in support for generating API schemas.
+We provide this support by using Core API, a Document Object Model +for describing APIs.
+Because Core API represents the API schema in an format-independent
+manner, we're able to render the Core API Document
object into many different
+schema formats, by allowing the renderer class to determine how the internal
+representation maps onto the external schema format.
This approach should also open the door to a range of auto-generated API
+documentation options in the future, by rendering the Document
object into
+HTML documentation pages.
Alongside the built-in schema support, we're also now providing the following:
+These API clients are dynamically driven, and able to interact with any API +that exposes a supported schema format.
+Dynamically driven clients allow you to interact with an API at an application +layer interface, rather than a network layer interface, while still providing +the benefits of RESTful Web API design.
+We're expecting to expand the range of languages that we provide client libraries +for over the coming months.
+Further work on maturing the API schema support is also planned, including +documentation on supporting file upload and download, and improved support for +documentation generation and parameter annotation.
+Current support for schema formats is as follows:
+Name | +Support | +PyPI package | +
---|---|---|
Core JSON | +Schema generation & client support. | +Built-in support in coreapi . |
+
Swagger / OpenAPI | +Schema generation & client support. | +The openapi-codec package. |
+
JSON Hyper-Schema | +Currently client support only. | +The hyperschema-codec package. |
+
API Blueprint | +Not yet available. | +Not yet available. | +
You can read more about any of this new functionality in the following:
+It is also worth noting that Marc Gibbons is currently working towards a 2.0 release of +the popular Django REST Swagger package, which will tie in with our new built-in support.
+The 3.4.0 release adds support for Django 1.10.
+The following versions of Python and Django are now supported:
+(*) Note that Python 3.2 and 3.3 are not supported from Django 1.9 onwards.
+The 3.4 release includes very limited deprecation or behavioral changes, and +should present a straightforward upgrade.
+The following change in 3.3.0 is now escalated from "pending deprecation" to +"deprecated". Its usage will continue to function but will raise warnings:
+ModelSerializer
and HyperlinkedModelSerializer
should include either a fields
+option, or an exclude
option. The fields = '__all__'
shortcut may be used
+to explicitly include all fields.
Using the default JSON renderer and directly returning a datetime
or time
+instance will now render with microsecond precision (6 digits), rather than
+millisecond precision (3 digits). This makes the output format consistent with the
+default string output of serializers.DateTimeField
and serializers.TimeField
.
This change does not affect the default behavior when using serializers,
+which is to serialize datetime
and time
instances into strings with
+microsecond precision.
The serializer behavior can be modified if needed, using the DATETIME_FORMAT
+and TIME_FORMAT
settings.
The renderer behavior can be modified by setting a custom encoder_class
+attribute on a JSONRenderer
subclass.
Making an OPTIONS
request to views that have a serializer choice field
+will result in a list of the available choices being returned in the response.
In cases where there is a relational field, the previous behavior would be +to return a list of available instances to choose from for that relational field.
+In order to minimise exposed information the behavior now is to not return +choices information for relational fields.
+If you want to override this new behavior you'll need to implement a custom +metadata class.
+See issue #3751 for more information on this behavioral change.
+This release includes further work from a huge number of pull requests and issues.
+Many thanks to all our contributors who've been involved in the release, either through raising issues, giving feedback, improving the documentation, or suggesting and implementing code changes.
+The full set of itemized release notes are available here.
+ + +The 3.5 release is the second in a planned series that is addressing schema +generation, hypermedia support, API client libraries, and finally realtime support.
+The 3.5 release would not have been possible without our collaborative funding model. +If you use REST framework commercially and would like to see this work continue, +we strongly encourage you to invest in its continued development by +signing up for a paid plan.
+Many thanks to all our sponsors, and in particular to our premium backers, Rover, Sentry, Stream, and Machinalis.
+Docstrings on views are now pulled through into schema definitions, allowing +you to use the schema definition to document your API.
+There is now also a shortcut function, get_schema_view()
, which makes it easier to
+adding schema views to your API.
For example, to include a swagger schema to your API, you would do the following:
+Run pip install django-rest-swagger
.
Add 'rest_framework_swagger'
to your INSTALLED_APPS
setting.
Include the schema view in your URL conf:
+from rest_framework.schemas import get_schema_view
+from rest_framework_swagger.renderers import OpenAPIRenderer, SwaggerUIRenderer
+
+schema_view = get_schema_view(
+ title='Example API',
+ renderer_classes=[OpenAPIRenderer, SwaggerUIRenderer]
+)
+
+urlpatterns = [
+ url(r'^swagger/$', schema_view),
+ ...
+]
+
+
+There have been a large number of fixes to the schema generation. These should
+resolve issues for anyone using the latest version of the django-rest-swagger
+package.
Some of these changes do affect the resulting schema structure, +so if you're already using schema generation you should make sure to review +the deprecation notes, particularly if you're currently using +a dynamic client library to interact with your API.
+Finally, we're also now exposing the schema generation as a +publicly documented API, allowing you to more easily +override the behaviour.
+You can now test your project using the requests
library.
This exposes exactly the same interface as if you were using a standard +requests session instance.
+client = RequestsClient()
+response = client.get('http://testserver/users/')
+assert response.status_code == 200
+
+Rather than sending any HTTP requests to the network, this interface will +coerce all outgoing requests into WSGI, and call into your application directly.
+You can also now test your project by interacting with it using the coreapi
+client library.
# Fetch the API schema
+client = CoreAPIClient()
+schema = client.get('http://testserver/schema/')
+
+# Create a new organisation
+params = {'name': 'MegaCorp', 'status': 'active'}
+client.action(schema, ['organisations', 'create'], params)
+
+# Ensure that the organisation exists in the listing
+data = client.action(schema, ['organisations', 'list'])
+assert(len(data) == 1)
+assert(data == [{'name': 'MegaCorp', 'status': 'active'}])
+
+Again, this will call directly into the application using the WSGI interface, +rather than making actual network calls.
+This is a good option if you are planning for clients to mainly interact with
+your API using the coreapi
client library, or some other auto-generated client.
One interesting aspect of both the requests
client and the coreapi
client
+is that they allow you to write tests in such a way that they can also be made
+to run against a live service.
By switching the WSGI based client instances to actual instances of requests.Session
+or coreapi.Client
you can have the test cases make actual network calls.
Being able to write test cases that can exercise your staging or production +environment is a powerful tool. However in order to do this, you'll need to pay +close attention to how you handle setup and teardown to ensure a strict isolation +of test data from other live or staging data.
+We now have preliminary support for RAML documentation generation.
+ +Further work on the encoding and documentation generation is planned, in order to +make features such as the 'Try it now' support available at a later date.
+This work also now means that you can use the Core API client libraries to interact +with APIs that expose a RAML specification. The RAML codec gives some examples of +interacting with the Spotify API in this way.
+Exceptions raised by REST framework now include short code identifiers. +When used together with our customizable error handling, this now allows you to +modify the style of API error messages.
+As an example, this allows for the following style of error responses:
+{
+ "message": "You do not have permission to perform this action.",
+ "code": "permission_denied"
+}
+
+This is particularly useful with validation errors, which use appropriate +codes to identify differing kinds of failure...
+{
+ "name": {"message": "This field is required.", "code": "required"},
+ "age": {"message": "A valid integer is required.", "code": "invalid"}
+}
+
+The Python coreapi
client library and the Core API command line tool both
+now fully support file uploads and downloads.
The router arguments for generating a schema view, such as schema_title
,
+are now pending deprecation.
Instead of using DefaultRouter(schema_title='Example API')
, you should use
+the get_schema_view()
function, and include the view in your URL conf.
Make sure to include the view before your router urls. For example:
+from rest_framework.schemas import get_schema_view
+from my_project.routers import router
+
+schema_view = get_schema_view(title='Example API')
+
+urlpatterns = [
+ url('^$', schema_view),
+ url(r'^', include(router.urls)),
+]
+
+The 'pk'
identifier in schema paths is now mapped onto the actually model field
+name by default. This will typically be 'id'
.
This gives a better external representation for schemas, with less implementation
+detail being exposed. It also reflects the behaviour of using a ModelSerializer
+class with fields = '__all__'
.
You can revert to the previous behaviour by setting 'SCHEMA_COERCE_PATH_PK': False
+in the REST framework settings.
The internal retrieve()
and destroy()
method names are now coerced to an
+external representation of read
and delete
.
You can revert to the previous behaviour by setting 'SCHEMA_COERCE_METHOD_NAMES': {}
+in the REST framework settings.
The functionality of the built-in DjangoFilterBackend
is now completely
+included by the django-filter
package.
You should change your imports and REST framework filter settings as follows:
+rest_framework.filters.DjangoFilterBackend
becomes django_filters.rest_framework.DjangoFilterBackend
.rest_framework.filters.FilterSet
becomes django_filters.rest_framework.FilterSet
.The existing imports will continue to work but are now pending deprecation.
+The media type for CoreJSON
is now application/json+coreapi
, rather than
+the previous application/vnd.json+coreapi
. This brings it more into line with
+other custom media types, such as those used by Swagger and RAML.
The clients currently accept either media type. The old style-media type will +be deprecated at a later date.
+ModelSerializer and HyperlinkedModelSerializer must include either a fields
+option, or an exclude option. The fields = '__all__'
shortcut may be used to
+explicitly include all fields.
Failing to set either fields
or exclude
raised a pending deprecation warning
+in version 3.3 and raised a deprecation warning in 3.4. Its usage is now mandatory.
The 3.6 release adds two major new features to REST framework.
+Above: The interactive API documentation.
+The 3.6 release would not have been possible without our backing from Mozilla to the project, and our collaborative funding model.
+If you use REST framework commercially and would like to see this work continue, +we strongly encourage you to invest in its continued development by +signing up for a paid plan.
+Many thanks to all our sponsors, and in particular to our premium backers, Rover, Sentry, Stream, Machinalis, Rollbar, and MicroPyramid.
+REST framework's new API documentation supports a number of features:
+The coreapi
library is required as a dependency for the API docs. Make sure
+to install the latest version (2.3.0 or above). The pygments
and markdown
+libraries are optional but recommended.
To install the API documentation, you'll need to include it in your projects URLconf:
+from rest_framework.documentation import include_docs_urls
+
+API_TITLE = 'API title'
+API_DESCRIPTION = '...'
+
+urlpatterns = [
+ ...
+ url(r'^docs/', include_docs_urls(title=API_TITLE, description=API_DESCRIPTION))
+]
+
+Once installed you should see something a little like this:
+ +We'll likely be making further refinements to the API documentation over the +coming weeks. Keep in mind that this is a new feature, and please do give +us feedback if you run into any issues or limitations.
+For more information on documenting your API endpoints see the "Documenting your API" section.
+The JavaScript client library allows you to load an API schema, and then interact +with that API at an application layer interface, rather than constructing fetch +requests explicitly.
+Here's a brief example that demonstrates:
+index.html
+<html>
+ <head>
+ <script src="/static/rest_framework/js/coreapi-0.1.0.js"></script>
+ <script src="/docs/schema.js"></script>
+ <script>
+ const coreapi = window.coreapi
+ const schema = window.schema
+
+ // Instantiate a client...
+ let auth = coreapi.auth.TokenAuthentication({scheme: 'JWT', token: 'xxx'})
+ let client = coreapi.Client({auth: auth})
+
+ // Make an API request...
+ client.action(schema, ['projects', 'list']).then(function(result) {
+ alert(result)
+ })
+ </script>
+ </head>
+</html>
+
+The JavaScript client library supports various authentication schemes, and can be +used by your project itself, or as an external client interacting with your API.
+The client is not limited to usage with REST framework APIs, although it does +currently only support loading CoreJSON API schemas. Support for Swagger and +other API schemas is planned.
+For more details see the JavaScript client library documentation.
+Previous authentication support in the Python client library was limited to +allowing users to provide explicit header values.
+We now have better support for handling the details of authentication, with
+the introduction of the BasicAuthentication
, TokenAuthentication
, and
+SessionAuthentication
schemes.
You can include the authentication scheme when instantiating a new client.
+auth = coreapi.auth.TokenAuthentication(scheme='JWT', token='xxx-xxx-xxx')
+client = coreapi.Client(auth=auth)
+
+For more information see the Python client library documentation.
+If you're using REST framework's schema generation, or want to use the API docs, +then you'll need to update to the latest version of coreapi. (2.3.0)
+The 3.5 "pending deprecation" of router arguments for generating a schema view, such as schema_title
, schema_url
and schema_renderers
, have now been escalated to a
+"deprecated" warning.
Instead of using DefaultRouter(schema_title='Example API')
, you should use the get_schema_view()
function, and include the view explicitly in your URL conf.
The 3.5 "pending deprecation" warning of the built-in DjangoFilterBackend
has now
+been escalated to a "deprecated" warning.
You should change your imports and REST framework filter settings as follows:
+rest_framework.filters.DjangoFilterBackend
becomes django_filters.rest_framework.DjangoFilterBackend
.rest_framework.filters.FilterSet
becomes django_filters.rest_framework.FilterSet
.There are likely to be a number of refinements to the API documentation and +JavaScript client library over the coming weeks, which could include some of the following:
+Once work on those refinements is complete, we'll be starting feature work +on realtime support, for the 3.7 release.
+ + +The 3.7 release focuses on improvements to schema generation and the interactive API documentation.
+This release has been made possible by Bayer who have sponsored the release.
+ +If you use REST framework commercially and would like to see this work continue, we strongly encourage you to invest in its continued development by +signing up for a paid plan.
+As well as our release sponsor, we'd like to say thanks in particular our premium backers, Rover, Sentry, Stream, Machinalis, and Rollbar.
+The schema generation introduced in 3.5 and the related API docs generation in 3.6 are both hugely powerful features, however they've been somewhat limited in cases where the view introspection isn't able to correctly identify the schema for a particular view.
+In order to try to address this we're now adding the ability for per-view customization of the API schema. The interface that we're adding for this allows either basic manual overrides over which fields should be included on a view, or for more complex programmatic overriding of the schema generation. We believe this release comprehensively addresses some of the existing shortcomings of the schema features.
+Let's take a quick look at using the new functionality...
+The APIView
class has a schema
attribute, that is used to control how the Schema for that particular view is generated. The default behaviour is to use the AutoSchema
class.
from rest_framework.views import APIView
+from rest_framework.schemas import AutoSchema
+
+class CustomView(APIView):
+ schema = AutoSchema() # Included for demonstration only. This is the default behavior.
+
+We can remove a view from the API schema and docs, like so:
+class CustomView(APIView):
+ schema = None
+
+If we want to mostly use the default behavior, but additionally include some additional fields on a particular view, we can now do so easily...
+class CustomView(APIView):
+ schema = AutoSchema(manual_fields=[
+ coreapi.Field('search', location='query')
+ ])
+
+To ignore the automatic generation for a particular view, and instead specify the schema explicitly, we use the ManualSchema
class instead...
class CustomView(APIView):
+ schema = ManualSchema(fields=[...])
+
+For more advanced behaviors you can subclass AutoSchema
to provide for customized schema generation, and apply that to particular views.
class CustomView(APIView):
+ schema = CustomizedSchemaGeneration()
+
+For full details on the new functionality, please see the Schema Documentation.
+REST framework 3.7 supports Django versions 1.10, 1.11, and 2.0 alpha.
+There are a large number of minor fixes and improvements in this release. See the release notes page for a complete listing.
+The number of open tickets against the project currently at its lowest number in quite some time, and we're continuing to focus on reducing these to a manageable amount.
+exclude_from_schema
Both APIView.exclude_from_schema
and the exclude_from_schema
argument to the @api_view
decorator and now PendingDeprecation
. They will be moved to deprecated in the 3.8 release, and removed entirely in 3.9.
For APIView
you should instead set a schema = None
attribute on the view class.
For function based views the @schema
decorator can be used to exclude the view from the schema, by using @schema(None)
.
DjangoFilterBackend
The DjangoFilterBackend
was moved to pending deprecation in 3.5, and deprecated in 3.6. It has now been removed from the core framework.
The functionality remains fully available, but is instead provided in the django-filter
package.
We're still planning to work on improving real-time support for REST framework by providing documentation on integrating with Django channels, as well adding support for more easily adding WebSocket support to existing HTTP endpoints.
+This will likely be timed so that any REST framework development here ties in with similar work on API Star.
+ + +The 3.8 release is a maintenance focused release resolving a large number of previously outstanding issues and laying +the foundations for future changes.
+If you use REST framework commercially and would like to see this work continue, we strongly encourage you to invest in its continued development by +signing up for a paid plan.
+We'd like to say thanks in particular our premium backers, Rover, Sentry, Stream, Machinalis, and Rollbar.
+read_only
plus default
on Field.#5886 read_only
fields will now always be excluded from writable fields.
Previously read_only
fields when combined with a default
value would use the default
for create and update
+operations. This was counter-intuitive in some circumstances and led to difficulties supporting dotted source
+attributes on nullable relations.
In order to maintain the old behaviour you may need to pass the value of read_only
fields when calling save()
in
+the view:
def perform_create(self, serializer):
+ serializer.save(owner=self.request.user)
+
+Alternatively you may override save()
or create()
or update()
on the serializer as appropriate.
action
decorator replaces list_route
and detail_route
#5705 list_route
and detail_route
have been merge into a single action
decorator. This improves viewset action introspection, and will allow extra actions to be displayed in the Browsable API in future versions.
Both list_route
and detail_route
are now pending deprecation. They will be deprecated in 3.9 and removed entirely
+in 3.10.
The new action
decorator takes a boolean detail
argument.
detail_route
uses with @action(detail=True)
.list_route
uses with @action(detail=False)
.exclude_from_schema
Both APIView.exclude_from_schema
and the exclude_from_schema
argument to the @api_view
decorator are now deprecated. They will be removed entirely in 3.9.
For APIView
you should instead set a schema = None
attribute on the view class.
For function based views the @schema
decorator can be used to exclude the view from the schema, by using @schema(None)
.
There are a large number of minor fixes and improvements in this release. See the release notes page +for a complete listing.
+We're currently working towards moving to using OpenAPI as our default schema output. We'll also be revisiting our API documentation generation and client libraries.
+We're doing some consolidation in order to make this happen. It's planned that 3.9 will drop the coreapi
and coreschema
libraries, and instead use apistar
for the API documentation generation, schema generation, and API client libraries.
The 3.9 release gives access to extra actions in the Browsable API, introduces composable permissions and built-in OpenAPI schema support. (Formerly known as Swagger)
+If you use REST framework commercially and would like to see this work continue, we strongly encourage you to invest in its continued development by +signing up for a paid plan.
+ + + + +Many thanks to all our wonderful sponsors, and in particular to our premium backers, Rover, Sentry, Stream, Auklet, Rollbar, Cadre, Load Impact, and Kloudless.
+REST framework now has a first-pass at directly including OpenAPI schema support. (Formerly known as Swagger)
+Specifically:
+OpenAPIRenderer
, and JSONOpenAPIRenderer
classes that deal with encoding coreapi.Document
instances into OpenAPI YAML or OpenAPI JSON.get_schema_view(...)
method now defaults to OpenAPI YAML, with CoreJSON as a secondary
+option if it is selected via HTTP content negotiation.generateschema
, which you can use to dump
+the schema into your repository.Here's an example of adding an OpenAPI schema to the URL conf:
+from rest_framework.schemas import get_schema_view
+from rest_framework.renderers import JSONOpenAPIRenderer
+
+schema_view = get_schema_view(
+ title='Server Monitoring API',
+ url='https://www.example.org/api/',
+ renderer_classes=[JSONOpenAPIRenderer]
+)
+
+urlpatterns = [
+ url('^schema.json$', schema_view),
+ ...
+]
+
+
+And here's how you can use the generateschema
management command:
$ python manage.py generateschema --format openapi > schema.yml
+
+
+There's lots of different tooling that you can use for working with OpenAPI +schemas. One option that we're working on is the API Star +command line tool.
+You can use apistar
to validate your API schema:
$ apistar validate --path schema.json --format openapi
+✓ Valid OpenAPI schema.
+
+
+Or to build API documentation:
+$ apistar docs --path schema.json --format openapi
+✓ Documentation built at "build/index.html".
+
+
+API Star also includes a dynamic client library +that uses an API schema to automatically provide a client library interface for making requests.
+You can now compose permission classes using the and/or operators, &
and |
.
For example...
+permission_classes = [IsAuthenticated & (ReadOnly | IsAdmin)]
+
+
+If you're using custom permission classes then make sure that you are subclassing
+from BasePermission
in order to enable this support.
Following the introduction of the action
decorator in v3.8, extra actions defined on a ViewSet are now available
+from the Browsable API.
When defined, a dropdown of "Extra Actions", appropriately filtered to detail/non-detail actions, is displayed.
+REST framework 3.9 supports Django versions 1.11, 2.0, and 2.1.
+DjangoObjectPermissionsFilter
moved to third-party package.The DjangoObjectPermissionsFilter
class is pending deprecation, will be deprecated in 3.10 and removed entirely in 3.11.
It has been moved to the third-party djangorestframework-guardian
+package. Please use this instead.
basename
for consistency.Router.register
base_name
argument has been renamed in favor of basename
.Router.get_default_base_name
method has been renamed in favor of Router.get_default_basename
. #5990See #5990.
+base_name
and get_default_base_name()
are pending deprecation. They will be deprecated in 3.10 and removed entirely in 3.11.
action
decorator replaces list_route
and detail_route
Both list_route
and detail_route
are now deprecated in favour of the single action
decorator.
+They will be removed entirely in 3.10.
The action
decorator takes a boolean detail
argument.
detail_route
uses with @action(detail=True)
.list_route
uses with @action(detail=False)
.exclude_from_schema
Both APIView.exclude_from_schema
and the exclude_from_schema
argument to the @api_view
have now been removed.
For APIView
you should instead set a schema = None
attribute on the view class.
For function-based views the @schema
decorator can be used to exclude the view from the schema, by using @schema(None)
.
There are a large number of minor fixes and improvements in this release. See the release notes page for a complete listing.
+We're planning to iteratively work towards OpenAPI becoming the standard schema
+representation. This will mean that the coreapi
dependency will gradually become
+removed, and we'll instead generate the schema directly, rather than building
+a CoreAPI Document
object.
OpenAPI has clearly become the standard for specifying Web APIs, so there's not +much value any more in our schema-agnostic document model. Making this change +will mean that we'll more easily be able to take advantage of the full set of +OpenAPI functionality.
+This will also make a wider range of tooling available.
+We'll focus on continuing to develop the API Star +library and client tool into a recommended option for generating API docs, +validating API schemas, and providing a dynamic client library.
+There's also a huge amount of ongoing work on maturing the ASGI landscape, +with the possibility that some of this work will eventually feed back into +Django.
+There will be further work on the Uvicorn +web server, as well as lots of functionality planned for the Starlette +web framework, which is building a foundational set of tooling for working with +ASGI.
+ + +++The world can only really be changed one piece at a time. The art is picking that piece.
+ +
There are many ways you can contribute to Django REST framework. We'd like it to be a community-led project, so please get involved and help shape the future of the project.
+The most important thing you can do to help push the REST framework project forward is to be actively involved wherever possible. Code contributions are often overvalued as being the primary way to get involved in a project, we don't believe that needs to be the case.
+If you use REST framework, we'd love you to be vocal about your experiences with it - you might consider writing a blog post about using REST framework, or publishing a tutorial about building a project with a particular JavaScript framework. Experiences from beginners can be particularly helpful because you'll be in the best position to assess which bits of REST framework are more difficult to understand and work with.
+Other really great ways you can help move the community forward include helping to answer questions on the discussion group, or setting up an email alert on StackOverflow so that you get notified of any new questions with the django-rest-framework
tag.
When answering questions make sure to help future contributors find their way around by hyperlinking wherever possible to related threads and tickets, and include backlinks from those items if relevant.
+Please keep the tone polite & professional. For some users a discussion on the REST framework mailing list or ticket tracker may be their first engagement with the open source community. First impressions count, so let's try to make everyone feel welcome.
+Be mindful in the language you choose. As an example, in an environment that is heavily male-dominated, posts that start 'Hey guys,' can come across as unintentionally exclusive. It's just as easy, and more inclusive to use gender neutral language in those situations.
+The Django code of conduct gives a fuller set of guidelines for participating in community forums.
+It's really helpful if you can make sure to address issues on the correct channel. Usage questions should be directed to the discussion group. Feature requests, bug reports and other issues should be raised on the GitHub issue tracker.
+Some tips on good issue reporting:
+Getting involved in triaging incoming issues is a good way to start contributing. Every single ticket that comes into the ticket tracker needs to be reviewed in order to determine what the next steps should be. Anyone can help out with this, you just need to be willing to
+To start developing on Django REST framework, first create a Fork from the +Django REST Framework repo on GitHub.
+Then clone your fork. The clone command will look like this, with your GitHub +username instead of YOUR-USERNAME:
+git clone https://github.com/YOUR-USERNAME/Spoon-Knife
+
+See GitHub's Fork a Repo Guide for more help.
+Changes should broadly follow the PEP 8 style conventions, and we recommend you set up your editor to automatically indicate non-conforming styles.
+To run the tests, clone the repository, and then:
+# Setup the virtual environment
+python3 -m venv env
+source env/bin/activate
+pip install django
+pip install -r requirements.txt
+
+# Run the tests
+./runtests.py
+
+Run using a more concise output style.
+./runtests.py -q
+
+Run the tests using a more concise output style, no coverage, no flake8.
+./runtests.py --fast
+
+Don't run the flake8 code linting.
+./runtests.py --nolint
+
+Only run the flake8 code linting, don't run the tests.
+./runtests.py --lintonly
+
+Run the tests for a given test case.
+./runtests.py MyTestCase
+
+Run the tests for a given test method.
+./runtests.py MyTestCase.test_this_method
+
+Shorter form to run the tests for a given test method.
+./runtests.py test_this_method
+
+Note: The test case and test method matching is fuzzy and will sometimes run other tests that contain a partial string match to the given command line input.
+You can also use the excellent tox testing tool to run the tests against all supported versions of Python and Django. Install tox
globally, and then simply run:
tox
+
+It's a good idea to make pull requests early on. A pull request represents the start of a discussion, and doesn't necessarily need to be the final, finished submission.
+It's also always best to make a new branch before starting work on a pull request. This means that you'll be able to later switch back to working on another separate issue without interfering with an ongoing pull requests.
+It's also useful to remember that if you have an outstanding pull request then pushing new commits to your GitHub repo will also automatically update the pull requests.
+GitHub's documentation for working on pull requests is available here.
+Always run the tests before submitting pull requests, and ideally run tox
in order to check that your modifications are compatible on all supported versions of Python and Django.
Once you've made a pull request take a look at the Travis build status in the GitHub interface and make sure the tests are running as you'd expect.
+ +Above: Travis build notifications
+Sometimes, in order to ensure your code works on various different versions of Django, Python or third party libraries, you'll need to run slightly different code depending on the environment. Any code that branches in this way should be isolated into the compat.py
module, and should provide a single common interface that the rest of the codebase can use.
The documentation for REST framework is built from the Markdown source files in the docs directory.
+There are many great Markdown editors that make working with the documentation really easy. The Mou editor for Mac is one such editor that comes highly recommended.
+To build the documentation, install MkDocs with pip install mkdocs
and then run the following command.
mkdocs build
+
+This will build the documentation into the site
directory.
You can build the documentation and open a preview in a browser window by using the serve
command.
mkdocs serve
+
+Documentation should be in American English. The tone of the documentation is very important - try to stick to a simple, plain, objective and well-balanced style where possible.
+Some other tips:
+There are a couple of conventions you should follow when working on the documentation.
+Headers should use the hash style. For example:
+### Some important topic
+
+The underline style should not be used. Don't do this:
+Some important topic
+====================
+
+Links should always use the reference style, with the referenced hyperlinks kept at the end of the document.
+Here is a link to [some other thing][other-thing].
+
+More text...
+
+[other-thing]: http://example.com/other/thing
+
+This style helps keep the documentation source consistent and readable.
+If you are hyperlinking to another REST framework document, you should use a relative link, and link to the .md
suffix. For example:
[authentication]: ../api-guide/authentication.md
+
+Linking in this style means you'll be able to click the hyperlink in your Markdown editor to open the referenced document. When the documentation is built, these links will be converted into regular links to HTML pages.
+If you want to draw attention to a note or warning, use a pair of enclosing lines, like so:
+---
+
+**Note:** A useful documentation note.
+
+---
+
+
+
+ If you use REST framework commercially we strongly encourage you to invest in its continued development by signing up for a paid plan.
+We believe that collaboratively funded software can offer outstanding returns on investment, by encouraging our users to collectively share the cost of development.
+Signing up for a paid plan will:
+REST framework continues to be open-source and permissively licensed, but we firmly believe it is in the commercial best-interest for users of the project to invest in its ongoing development.
+Sign up for a paid plan today, and help ensure that REST framework becomes a sustainable, full-time funded project.
+++As a developer, Django REST framework feels like an obvious and natural extension to all the great things that make up Django and it's community. Getting started is easy while providing simple abstractions which makes it flexible and customizable. Contributing and supporting Django REST framework helps ensure its future and one way or another it also helps Django, and the Python ecosystem.
+— José Padilla, Django REST framework contributor
+
+
++The number one feature of the Python programming language is its community. Such a community is only possible because of the Open Source nature of the language and all the culture that comes from it. Building great Open Source projects require great minds. Given that, we at Vinta are not only proud to sponsor the team behind DRF but we also recognize the ROI that comes from it.
+— Filipe Ximenes, Vinta Software
+
+
++It's really awesome that this project continues to endure. The code base is top notch and the maintainers are committed to the highest level of quality. +DRF is one of the core reasons why Django is top choice among web frameworks today. In my opinion, it sets the standard for rest frameworks for the development community at large.
+— Andrew Conti, Django REST framework user
+
This subscription is recommended for individuals with an interest in seeing REST framework continue to improve.
+If you are using REST framework as a full-time employee, consider recommending that your company takes out a corporate plan.
+Billing is monthly and you can cancel at any time.
+These subscriptions are recommended for companies and organizations using REST framework either publicly or privately.
+In exchange for funding you'll also receive advertising space on our site, allowing you to promote your company or product to many tens of thousands of developers worldwide.
+Our professional and premium plans also include priority support. At any time your engineers can escalate an issue or discussion group thread, and we'll ensure it gets a guaranteed response within the next working day.
+Billing is monthly and you can cancel at any time.
+Once you've signed up, we will contact you via email and arrange your ad placements on the site.
+For further enquires please contact funding@django-rest-framework.org.
+In an effort to keep the project as transparent as possible, we are releasing monthly progress reports and regularly include financial reports and cost breakdowns.
+ + ++ +
Q: Can you issue monthly invoices? +A: Yes, we are happy to issue monthly invoices. Please just email us and let us know who to issue the invoice to (name and address) and which email address to send it to each month.
+Q: Does sponsorship include VAT? +A: Sponsorship is VAT exempt.
+Q: Do I have to sign up for a certain time period? +A: No, we appreciate your support for any time period that is convenient for you. Also, you can cancel your sponsorship anytime.
+Q: Can I pay yearly? Can I pay upfront fox X amount of months at a time? +A: We are currently only set up to accept monthly payments. However, if you'd like to support Django REST framework and you can only do yearly/upfront payments, we are happy to work with you and figure out a convenient solution.
+Q: Are you only looking for corporate sponsors? +A: No, we value individual sponsors just as much as corporate sponsors and appreciate any kind of support.
+Looking for a new Django REST Framework related role? On this site we provide a list of job resources that may be helpful. It's also worth checking out if any of our sponsors are hiring.
+Know of any other great resources for Django REST Framework jobs that are missing in our list? Please submit a pull request or email us.
+Wonder how else you can help? One of the best ways you can help Django REST Framework is to ask interviewers if their company is signed up for REST Framework sponsorship yet.
+ + +In order to continue to drive the project forward, I'm launching a Kickstarter campaign to help fund the development of a major new release - Django REST framework 3.
+This new release will allow us to comprehensively address some of the shortcomings of the framework, and will aim to include the following:
+Full details are available now on the project page.
+If you're interested in helping make sustainable open source development a reality please visit the Kickstarter page and consider funding the project.
+I can't wait to see where this takes us!
+Many thanks to everyone for your support so far,
+Tom Christie :)
+We've now blazed way past all our goals, with a staggering £30,000 (~$50,000), meaning I'll be in a position to work on the project significantly beyond what we'd originally planned for. I owe a huge debt of gratitude to all the wonderful companies and individuals who have been backing the project so generously, and making this possible.
+Our platinum sponsors have each made a hugely substantial contribution to the future development of Django REST framework, and I simply can't thank them enough.
+Our gold sponsors include companies large and small. Many thanks for their significant funding of the project and their commitment to sustainable open-source development.
+The serious financial contribution that our silver sponsors have made is very much appreciated. I'd like to say a particular thank you to individuals who have chosen to privately support the project at this level.
+Individual backers: Paul Hallett, Paul Whipp, Dylan Roy, Jannis Leidel, Xavier Ordoquy, Johannes Spielmann, Rob Spectre, Chris Heisel, Marwan Alsabbagh, Haris Ali, Tuomas Toivonen.
+The following individuals made a significant financial contribution to the development of Django REST framework 3, for which I can only offer a huge, warm and sincere thank you!
+Individual backers: Jure Cuhalev, Kevin Brolly, Ferenc Szalai, Dougal Matthews, Stefan Foulis, Carlos Hernando, Alen Mujezinovic, Ross Crawford-d'Heureuse, George Kappel, Alasdair Nicol, John Carr, Steve Winton, Trey, Manuel Miranda, David Horn, Vince Mi, Daniel Sears, Jamie Matthews, Ryan Currah, Marty Kemka, Scott Nixon, Moshin Elahi, Kevin Campbell, Jose Antonio Leiva Izquierdo, Kevin Stone, Andrew Godwin, Tijs Teulings, Roger Boardman, Xavier Antoviaque, Darian Moody, Lujeni, Jon Dugan, Wiley Kestner, Daniel C. Silverstein, Daniel Hahler, Subodh Nijsure, Philipp Weidenhiller, Yusuke Muraoka, Danny Roa, Reto Aebersold, Kyle Getrost, Décébal Hormuz, James Dacosta, Matt Long, Mauro Rocco, Tyrel Souza, Ryan Campbell, Ville Jyrkkä, Charalampos Papaloizou, Nikolai Røed Kristiansen, Antoni Aloy López, Celia Oakley, Michał Krawczak, Ivan VenOsdel, Tim Watts, Martin Warne, Nicola Jordan, Ryan Kaskel.
+Corporate backers: Savannah Informatics, Prism Skylabs, Musical Operating Devices.
+There were also almost 300 further individuals choosing to help fund the project at other levels or choosing to give anonymously. Again, thank you, thank you, thank you!
+ + +We have recently been awarded a Mozilla grant, in order to fund the next major releases of REST framework. This work will focus on seamless client-side integration by introducing supporting client libraries that are able to dynamically interact with REST framework APIs. The framework will provide for either hypermedia or schema endpoints, which will expose the available interface for the client libraries to interact with.
+Additionally, we will be building on the realtime support that Django Channels provides, supporting and documenting how to build realtime APIs with REST framework. Again, this will include supporting work in the associated client libraries, making it easier to build richly interactive applications.
+The Core API project will provide the foundations for our client library support, and will allow us to support interaction using a wide range of schemas and hypermedia formats. It's worth noting that these client libraries won't be tightly coupled to solely REST framework APIs either, and will be able to interact with any API that exposes a supported schema or hypermedia format.
+Specifically, the work includes:
+This work will include built-in schema and hypermedia support, allowing dynamic client libraries to interact with the API. I'll also be releasing both Python and Javascript client libraries, plus a command-line client, a new tutorial section, and further documentation.
+The next goal is to build on the realtime support offered by Django Channels, adding support & documentation for building realtime API endpoints.
+In order to ensure that I can be fully focused on trying to secure a sustainable +& well-funded open source business I will be leaving my current role at DabApps +at the end of May 2016.
+I have formed a UK limited company, Encode, which will +act as the business entity behind REST framework. I will be issuing monthly reports +from Encode on progress both towards the Mozilla grant, and for development time +funded via the REST framework paid plans.
+ + ++ +
++"No one can whistle a symphony; it takes a whole orchestra to play it"
+— Halford E. Luccock
+
This document outlines our project management processes for REST framework.
+The aim is to ensure that the project has a high +"bus factor", and can continue to remain well supported for the foreseeable future. Suggestions for improvements to our process are welcome.
+We have a quarterly maintenance cycle where new members may join the maintenance team. We currently cap the size of the team at 5 members, and may encourage folks to step out of the team for a cycle to allow new members to participate.
+The maintenance team for Q4 2015:
+Each maintenance cycle is initiated by an issue being opened with the Process
label.
@tomchristie
.Members of the maintenance team will be added as collaborators to the repository.
+The following template should be used for the description of the issue, and serves as the formal process for selecting the team.
+This issue is for determining the maintenance team for the *** period.
+
+Please see the [Project management](https://www.django-rest-framework.org/topics/project-management/) section of our documentation for more details.
+
+---
+
+#### Renewing existing members.
+
+The following people are the current maintenance team. Please checkmark your name if you wish to continue to have write permission on the repository for the *** period.
+
+- [ ] @***
+- [ ] @***
+- [ ] @***
+- [ ] @***
+- [ ] @***
+
+---
+
+#### New members.
+
+If you wish to be considered for this or a future date, please comment against this or subsequent issues.
+
+To modify this process for future maintenance cycles make a pull request to the [project management](https://www.django-rest-framework.org/topics/project-management/) documentation.
+
+Team members have the following responsibilities.
+mkdocs gh-deploy
.Further notes for maintainers:
+It should be noted that participating actively in the REST framework project clearly does not require being part of the maintenance team. Almost every import part of issue triage and project improvement can be actively worked on regardless of your collaborator status on the repository.
+The release manager is selected on every quarterly maintenance cycle.
+@tomchristie
.Our PyPI releases will be handled by either the current release manager, or by @tomchristie
. Every release should have an open issue tagged with the Release
label and marked against the appropriate milestone.
The following template should be used for the description of the issue, and serves as a release checklist.
+Release manager is @***.
+Pull request is #***.
+
+During development cycle:
+
+- [ ] Upload the new content to be translated to [transifex](https://www.django-rest-framework.org/topics/project-management/#translations).
+
+
+Checklist:
+
+- [ ] Create pull request for [release notes](https://github.com/encode/django-rest-framework/blob/master/docs/topics/release-notes.md) based on the [*.*.* milestone](https://github.com/encode/django-rest-framework/milestones/***).
+- [ ] Update supported versions:
+ - [ ] `setup.py` `python_requires` list
+ - [ ] `setup.py` Python & Django version trove classifiers
+ - [ ] `README` Python & Django versions
+ - [ ] `docs` Python & Django versions
+- [ ] Update the translations from [transifex](https://www.django-rest-framework.org/topics/project-management/#translations).
+- [ ] Ensure the pull request increments the version to `*.*.*` in [`restframework/__init__.py`](https://github.com/encode/django-rest-framework/blob/master/rest_framework/__init__.py).
+- [ ] Confirm with @tomchristie that release is finalized and ready to go.
+- [ ] Ensure that release date is included in pull request.
+- [ ] Merge the release pull request.
+- [ ] Push the package to PyPI with `./setup.py publish`.
+- [ ] Tag the release, with `git tag -a *.*.* -m 'version *.*.*'; git push --tags`.
+- [ ] Deploy the documentation with `mkdocs gh-deploy`.
+- [ ] Make a release announcement on the [discussion group](https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!forum/django-rest-framework).
+- [ ] Make a release announcement on twitter.
+- [ ] Close the milestone on GitHub.
+
+To modify this process for future releases make a pull request to the [project management](https://www.django-rest-framework.org/topics/project-management/) documentation.
+
+When pushing the release to PyPI ensure that your environment has been installed from our development requirement.txt
, so that documentation and PyPI installs are consistently being built against a pinned set of packages.
The maintenance team are responsible for managing the translation packs include in REST framework. Translating the source strings into multiple languages is managed through the transifex service.
+The official Transifex client is used to upload and download translations to Transifex. The client is installed using pip:
+pip install transifex-client
+
+To use it you'll need a login to Transifex which has a password, and you'll need to have administrative access to the Transifex project. You'll need to create a ~/.transifexrc
file which contains your credentials.
[https://www.transifex.com]
+username = ***
+token = ***
+password = ***
+hostname = https://www.transifex.com
+
+When any user visible strings are changed, they should be uploaded to Transifex so that the translators can start to translate them. To do this, just run:
+# 1. Update the source django.po file, which is the US English version.
+cd rest_framework
+django-admin makemessages -l en_US
+# 2. Push the source django.po file to Transifex.
+cd ..
+tx push -s
+
+When pushing source files, Transifex will update the source strings of a resource to match those from the new source file.
+Here's how differences between the old and new source files will be handled:
+When a translator has finished translating their work needs to be downloaded from Transifex into the REST framework repository. To do this, run:
+# 3. Pull the translated django.po files from Transifex.
+tx pull -a --minimum-perc 10
+cd rest_framework
+# 4. Compile the binary .mo files for all supported languages.
+django-admin compilemessages
+
+All our test requirements are pinned to exact versions, in order to ensure that our test runs are reproducible. We maintain the requirements in the requirements
directory. The requirements files are referenced from the tox.ini
configuration file, ensuring we have a single source of truth for package versions used in testing.
Package upgrades should generally be treated as isolated pull requests. You can check if there are any packages available at a newer version, by using the pip list --outdated
.
The PyPI package is owned by @tomchristie
. As a backup @j4mie
also has ownership of the package.
If @tomchristie
ceases to participate in the project then @j4mie
has responsibility for handing over ownership duties.
The following issues still need to be addressed:
+@jamie
has back-up access to the django-rest-framework.org
domain setup and admin.Minor version numbers (0.0.x) are used for changes that are API compatible. You should be able to upgrade between minor point releases without any other code changes.
+Medium version numbers (0.x.0) may include API changes, in line with the deprecation policy. You should read the release notes carefully before upgrading between medium point releases.
+Major version numbers (x.0.0) are reserved for substantial project milestones.
+REST framework releases follow a formal deprecation policy, which is in line with Django's deprecation policy.
+The timeline for deprecation of a feature present in version 1.0 would work as follows:
+Version 1.1 would remain fully backwards compatible with 1.0, but would raise RemovedInDRF13Warning
warnings, subclassing PendingDeprecationWarning
, if you use the feature that are due to be deprecated. These warnings are silent by default, but can be explicitly enabled when you're ready to start migrating any required changes. For example if you start running your tests using python -Wd manage.py test
, you'll be warned of any API changes you need to make.
Version 1.2 would escalate these warnings to subclass DeprecationWarning
, which is loud by default.
Version 1.3 would remove the deprecated bits of API entirely.
+Note that in line with Django's policy, any parts of the framework not mentioned in the documentation should generally be considered private API, and may be subject to change.
+To upgrade Django REST framework to the latest version, use pip:
+pip install -U djangorestframework
+
+You can determine your currently installed version using pip show
:
pip show djangorestframework
+
+lowerInitialCamelCase
style in OpenAPI operation IDs.minLength
/maxLength
/minItems
/maxItems
properties in OpenAPI schemas.FileField.url
once in serialization, for improved performance.Fix an edge case where throttling calcualtions could error after a configuration change.
+TODO
+Date: 29th July 2019
+OpenAPI
schema fixes.Date: 17th July 2019
+uritemplate
for OpenAPI schema generation, but not coreapi
.Date: 15th July 2019
+generateschema --generator_class
CLI optionpyyaml>=5.1
#6680user.get_username
in templates, in preference to user.username
.source="*"
SerializerMethodField
field name arguments.Date: 10th May 2019
+This is a maintenance release that fixes an error handling bug under Python 2.
+Date: 29th April 2019
+This is the last Django REST Framework release that will support Python 2. +Be sure to upgrade to Python 3 before upgrading to Django REST Framework 3.10.
+Date: 3rd March 2019
+_urls
cache on register()
#6407validators
to accept non-list iterables. #6282RemovedInDRF…Warning
classes to simplify deprecations. #6480Date: 16th January 2019
+limit_choices_to
on foreign keys. #6371Date: 18th October 2018
+action
support for ViewSet suffixes #6081action
docs sections #6060Router.register
base_name
argument in favor of basename
. #5990Router.get_default_base_name
method in favor of Router.get_default_basename
. #5990CharField
to disallow null bytes. #6073
+ To revert to the old behavior, subclass CharField
and remove ProhibitNullCharactersValidator
from the validators.
+ python
+ class NullableCharField(serializers.CharField):
+ def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
+ super().__init__(*args, **kwargs)
+ self.validators = [v for v in self.validators if not isinstance(v, ProhibitNullCharactersValidator)]
OpenAPIRenderer
and generate_schema
management command. #6229e.indexOf
is not a function error #5982DjangoObjectPermissionsFilter
class, moved to the djangorestframework-guardian
package. #6075Date: 6th April 2018
+read_only
+ default
unique_together
validation. #5922Date: 4th April 2018
+Use old url_name
behavior in route decorators #5915
For list_route
and detail_route
maintain the old behavior of url_name
,
+basing it on the url_path
instead of the function name.
Date: 3rd April 2018
+Breaking Change: Alter read_only
plus default
behaviour. #5886
read_only
fields will now always be excluded from writable fields.
Previously read_only
fields with a default
value would use the default
for create and update operations.
In order to maintain the old behaviour you may need to pass the value of read_only
fields when calling save()
in
+the view:
def perform_create(self, serializer):
+ serializer.save(owner=self.request.user)
+
+Alternatively you may override save()
or create()
or update()
on the serializer as appropriate.
Correct allow_null behaviour when required=False #5888
+Without an explicit default
, allow_null
implies a default of null
for outgoing serialization. Previously such
+fields were being skipped when read-only or otherwise not required.
Possible backwards compatibility break if you were relying on such fields being excluded from the outgoing
+representation. In order to restore the old behaviour you can override data
to exclude the field when None
.
For example:
+@property
+def data(self):
+ """
+ Drop `maybe_none` field if None.
+ """
+ data = super().data
+ if 'maybe_none' in data and data['maybe_none'] is None:
+ del data['maybe_none']
+ return data
+
+Refactor dynamic route generation and improve viewset action introspectibility. #5705
+ViewSet
s have been provided with new attributes and methods that allow
+it to introspect its set of actions and the details of the current action.
list_route
and detail_route
into a single action
decorator.ViewSet
with .get_extra_actions()
.url_name
and url_path
on the decorated method.url_name
is now based on the function name, instead of the url_path
,
+ as the path is not always suitable (e.g., capturing arguments in the path)..reverse_action()
method (added in 3.7.4)self.reverse_action(self.custom_action.url_name)
detail
initkwarg to indicate if the current action is operating on a
+ collection or a single instance.Additional changes:
+list_route
& detail_route
in favor of action
decorator with detail
boolean.DynamicRoute
with detail
boolean.list_route
and detail_route
maintain the old behavior of url_name
,
+ basing it on the url_path
instead of the function name.Fix formatting of the 3.7.4 release note #5704
+compat._resolve_model()
#5733iter(dict)
over iter(dict.keys())
#5736python_requires
argument to setuptools #5739pip show
#5757fields
docs #5783__eq__
/__ne__
and __repr__
#5787background-attachment: fixed
in docs #5777exceptions.APIException
output #57630
. #5834LimitOffsetPagination.get_count
to allow method override #5846Date: 21st December 2017
+ +Date: 21st December 2017
+Date: 21st December 2017
+Date: 20th December 2017
+Schema: Extract method for manual_fields
processing #5633
Allows for easier customisation of manual_fields
processing, for example
+to provide per-method manual fields. AutoSchema
adds get_manual_fields
,
+as the intended override point, and a utility method update_fields
, to
+handle by-name field replacement from a list, which, in general, you are not
+expected to override.
Note: AutoSchema.__init__
now ensures manual_fields
is a list.
+Previously may have been stored internally as None
.
Remove ulrparse compatibility shim; use six instead #5579
+TimeDelta.total_seconds()
#5577set_rollback()
from compat #5591__getattr__
#5617Serializer._declared_fields
enable modifying fields on a serializer #5629allow_null=True
should not imply a default value #5639allow_null
serialization output note #5641Serializer.data
for Browsable API rendering when provided invalid data
#5646.basename
and .reverse_action()
to ViewSet #5648override_settings
compat #5668required=False
#5665UNAUTHENTICATED_USER = None
note #5679to_representation
docs #5682source=‘*’
to custom field docs. #5688Date: 6th November 2017
+AppRegistryNotReady
error from contrib.auth view imports #5567Date: 6th November 2017
+allow_null=True
should imply a default serialization value #5518drf_create_token
command #5550wheel
] section to [bdist_wheel
] as the former is legacy #5557Date: 16th October 2017
+source
fields #5489Date: 6th October 2017
+DjangoModelPermissions
to ensure user authentication before calling the view's get_queryset()
method. As a side effect, this changes the order of the HTTP method permissions and authentication checks, and 405 responses will only be returned when authenticated. If you want to replicate the old behavior, see the PR for details. #5376exclude_from_schema
on APIView
and api_view
decorator. Set schema = None
or @schema(None)
as appropriate. #5422Timezone-aware DateTimeField
s now respect active or default timezone
during serialization, instead of always using UTC. #5435
Resolves inconsistency whereby instances were serialized with supplied datetime for create
but UTC for retrieve
. #3732
Possible backwards compatibility break if you were relying on datetime strings being UTC. Have client interpret datetimes or set default or active timezone (docs) to UTC if needed.
+Removed DjangoFilterBackend inline with deprecation policy. Use django_filters.rest_framework.FilterSet
and/or django_filters.rest_framework.DjangoFilterBackend
instead. #5273
time
when encoding. Makes consistent with datetime
.
+ BC Change: Previously only milliseconds were encoded. #5440STRICT_JSON
setting (default True
) to raise exception for the extended float values (nan
, inf
, -inf
) accepted by Python's json
module.
+ BC Change: Previously these values would converted to corresponding strings. Set STRICT_JSON
to False
to restore the previous behaviour. #5265page_size
parameter in CursorPaginator class #5250DEFAULT_PAGINATION_CLASS
None
by default.
+ BC Change: If your were just setting PAGE_SIZE
to enable pagination you will need to add DEFAULT_PAGINATION_CLASS
.
+ The previous default was rest_framework.pagination.PageNumberPagination
. There is a system check warning to catch this case. You may silence that if you are setting pagination class on a per-view basis. #5170APIException
from get_serializer_fields
in schema generation. #5443include_docs_urls
#5448get_queryset
returned None
#5348data
description #5361ChoiceField.choices
to be set dynamically #5426drf-openapi
package in docs #5470data
#5472is_list_view
recognise RetrieveModel… views #5480SchemaGenerator.get_serializer_fields
has been refactored as AutoSchema.get_serializer_fields
and drops the view
argument [#5354][gh5354]Date: 21st August 2017
+HTML_CUTOFF
is set to None
. #5174multipart/form-data
correctly. #5176test_hyperlinked_related_lookup_url_encoded_exists
. #5179list_route
& detail_route
with kwargs contains curly bracket in url_path
#5187Date: 12th May 2017
+get_limit
in LimitOffsetPagination to return all records. (#4437)page_size
attribute. (#5086, #3692).as_view()
to view instance. (#5053)extra_kwargs
. (#4688)Date: 10th March 2017
+mark_safe
in API docs template tags. (#4952, #4953)Date: 9th March 2017
+markdown
dependency is optional. (#4947)Date: 9th March 2017
+See the release announcement.
+Date: 10th February 2017
+@list_route
and @detail_route
endpoints. (#4821)PUT
requests when prefetch_related
is used. (#4661, #4668)Date: 7th November 2016
+autofocus
support for input controls. (#4650)Date: 1st November 2016
+Date: 21st October 2016
+rest_framework/compat.py
imports. (#4612, #4608, #4601)raise
for Python 3.5 compat. (#4600)Date: 20th October 2016
+Date: 21st September 2016
+RegexField
. (#4489, #4490, #2617)admin.html
causing CSRF error. (#4472, #4473)ResolverMatch.func_name
of api_view decorated view. (#4465, #4462)APIClient.get()
when path contains unicode arguments (#4458)Date: 23rd August 2016
+AdminRenderer
display of PK only related fields. (#4419, #4423)Date: 19th August 2016
+Date: 12th August 2016
+max_digits=None
on DecimalField. (#4377, #4372)Date: 5th August 2016
+Date: 5th August 2016
+request.user.is_authenticated
as property not method, under Django 1.10+ (#4358, #4354)Date: 28th July 2016
+root_renderers
argument to DefaultRouter
. (#4323, #4268)url
and schema_url
arguments. (#4321, #4308, #4305)pagination_class = None
. (#4314, #4289)get_serializer_class
. (#4265, #4285)Accept
and Content-Type
headers. (#4287, #4313, #4281)Date: 14th July 2016
+DecimalField
. (#4233)must_call_distinct
. (#4215)limit=0
should revert to default limit. (#4194).validated_data
and .errors
as lists not dicts for ListSerializer. (#4180)AUTH_USER_MODEL
compat property. (#4176)OrderingFilter
should call get_serializer_class()
to determine default fields. (#3964)initial
for any serializer.Field
. (#3943)field.rel
. (#3906)help_text
in Browsable API forms. (#3812)lookup_type
is deprecated in favor of lookup_expr
. (#4259)Date: 14th March 2016.
+BooleanField
. Thanks to Mikalai Radchuk for the fix. (#3910)Token
model as abstract
when the authtoken application isn't declared. Thanks to Adam Thomas for the report. (#3860, #3858)QueryParameterVersioning
does not use DEFAULT_VERSION
setting. Thanks to Brad Montgomery for the fix. (#3833)on_delete
on the models. Thanks to Mads Jensen for the fix. (#3832)DateField.to_representation
to work with Python 2 unicode. Thanks to Mikalai Radchuk for the fix. (#3819)TimeField
not handling string times. Thanks to Areski Belaid for the fix. (#3809)Meta.extra_kwargs
. Thanks to Kevin Massey for the report and fix. (#3805, #3804)django-crispy-forms
. Thanks to Emmanuelle Delescolle, José Padilla and Luis San Pablo for the report, analysis and fix. (#3787, #3636, #3637)Min/MaxValueValidator
transfer from a model's DecimalField
. Thanks to Kevin Brown for the fix. (#3774)AutoFilterSet
to inherit from default_filter_set
. Thanks to Tom Linford for the fix. (#3753)DateTimeField
does not handle empty values correctly. Thanks to Mick Parker for the report and fix. (#3731, #3726)_get_reverse_relationships()
to use correct to_field
. Thanks to Benjamin Phillips for the fix. (#3696)get_queryset
for RelatedField
. Thanks to Ryan Hiebert for the fix. (#3605)Date: 14th December 2015.
+ListField
enforces input is a list. (#3513)pagination.PageNumberPagination
. (#3631, #3684)to_fields
attribute. (#3635, #3634)template.render
deprecation warnings for Django 1.9. (#3654)NestedBoundField
to also handle empty string when rendering its form. (#3677)Date: 4th November 2015.
+request.POST
(#3592)to_field
referring to primary key. (#3593)filter_class
is defined. (#3560)Date: 28th October 2015.
+to_field
when creating ModelSerializer
relational fields. (#3526)FilePathField
to a serializer field. (#3536)error_messages
on ModelSerializer
uniqueness constraints. (#3435)max_length
constraint for ModelSerializer
fields mapped from TextField. (#3509)Date: 27th October 2015.
+username
in optional logout tag. (#3550)Date: 21th September 2015.
+ViewSet.search_fields
attribute. (#3324, #3323)allow_empty
not working on serializers with many=True
. (#3361, #3364)DurationField
accepts integers. (#3359)ListField
truncation on HTTP PATCH (#3415, #2761)Date: 24th August 2015.
+html_cutoff
and html_cutoff_text
for limiting select dropdowns. (#3313)SearchFilter
. (#3316)IPAddressField
. ([#3249gh3249) (#3250)LimitOffsetPagination
when count=0, offset=0. (#3303)Date: 13th August 2015.
+display_value()
method for use when displaying relational field select inputs. (#3254)BooleanField
checkboxes incorrectly displaying as checked. (#3258)BooleanField
to False
in all cases. (#2776)WSGIRequest.FILES
property without raising incorrect deprecated error. (#3261)Date: 7th August 2015.
+1
, 0
rendering as true
, false
in the admin interface. #3227)request.FILES
for compat with Django's HTTPRequest
class. (#3239)Date: 6th August 2015.
+AdminRenderer
. (#2926)FilePathField
. (#1854)allow_empty
to ListField
. (#2250)source=<method>
on hyperlinked fields. (#2690)ListField(allow_null=True)
now allows null as the list value, not null items in the list. (#2766)ManyToMany()
maps to allow_empty=False
, ManyToMany(blank=True)
maps to allow_empty=True
. (#2804)OPTIONS
requests support nested representations. (#2915)view.action == "metadata"
for viewsets with OPTIONS
requests. (#3115)allow_blank
on UUIDField
. ([#3130][gh#3130])DecimalField
validation. (#3139)allow_blank=False
when used with trim_whitespace=True
. (#2712)allow_blank
argument. (#3011)UnicodeDecodeError
when invalid characters included in header with TokenAuthentication
. (#2928)@non_atomic_requests
decorator. (#3016)SearchFilter
. (#2935)"url": null
in the representation. (#2759)HStoreField
to include allow_blank=True
in DictField
mapping. (#2659)Date: 4th June 2015.
+DurationField
. (#2481, #2989)format
argument to UUIDField
. (#2788, #3000)MultipleChoiceField
empties incorrectly on a partial update using multipart/form-data (#2993, #2894)RelatedField
. (#2981, #2811)unique_together
relations. (#2975)ChoiceField
/MultipleChoiceField
representations. (#2839, #2940)ATOMIC_REQUESTS
is set. (#2887, #2034)DecimalField
accepts 2E+2
as 200 and validates decimal place correctly. (#2948, #2947)UserModel
that change username
. (#2952)IPAddressField
improvements. (#2747, #2618, #3008)DecimalField
for easier subclassing. (#2695)Date: 13rd May 2015.
+DateField.to_representation
can handle str and empty values. (#2656, #2687, #2869)ModelSerializer
used with abstract model. (#2757, #2630)HyperLinkedRelatedField
(#2724, #2711).model
attribute in permissions (#2818)IntegerField
to use compiled decimal regex. (#2853)queryset
to raise AssertionError. (#2862)DjangoModelPermissions
rely on get_queryset
. (#2863)AcceptHeaderVersioning
with content negotiation in place. (#2868)DjangoObjectPermissions
to use views that define get_queryset
. (#2905)Date: 23rd March 2015.
+serializer_class
is used, even when get_serializer
method does not exist on the view. (#2743)lookup_url_kwarg
handling in viewsets. (#2685, #2591)rest_framework.views
in apps.py
(#2678)TypeError
if PAGE_SIZE not set (#2667, #2700)min_value
field error message references max_value
. (#2645)MergeDict
. (#2640)Date: 5th March 2015.
+For full details see the 3.1 release announcement.
+Date: 10th February 2015.
+_closable_objects
breaks pickling. (#1850, #2492)User
models with Throttling
. (#2524)User.db_table
in TokenAuthentication migration. (#2479)AttributeError
tracebacks on Request
objects. (#2530, #2108)ManyRelatedField.get_value
clearing field on partial update. (#2475)detail_route
and list_route
mutable argument. (#2518)TokenAuthentication
. (#2519)Date: 28th January 2015.
+DictField
and support Django 1.8 HStoreField
. (#2451, #2106)UUIDField
and support Django 1.8 UUIDField
. (#2448, #2433, #2432)BaseRenderer.render
now raises NotImplementedError
. (#2434)ResultDict
and ResultList
now appear as standard dict/list. (#2421)HiddenField
in the HTML form of the web browsable API page. (#2410)OrderedDict
for RelatedField.choices
. (#2408)HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR
. (#2401)FileUploadParser
with version 3.x. (#2399)ReturnDict
. (#2360)Date: 8th January 2015.
+MinValueValidator
on models.DateField
. (#2369)DefaultRouter
. (#2351)required=False
allows omission of value for output. (#2342)models.TextField
. (#2340)ListSerializer
for pagination if required. (#2331, #2327)exclude
are model fields. (#2319)IntegerField
and max_length
argument incompatibility. (#2317)format_suffix_patterns
to work with Django's i18n_patterns
. (#2278)url_path
. (#2010)Date: 17th December 2014.
+request.user
is made available to response middleware. (#2155)Client.logout()
also cancels any existing force_authenticate
. (#2218, #2259)min_length
message for CharField
. (#2255)UnicodeDecodeError
, which can occur on serializer repr
. (#2270, #2279)SlugRelatedField
raising UnicodeEncodeError
when used as a multiple choice input. (#2290)Date: 11th December 2014.
+create()
fails. (#2013)FileUploadParser
breaks with empty file names and multiple upload handlers. (#2109)BindingDict
to support standard dict-functions. (#2135, #2163)validate()
to ListSerializer
. (#2168, #2225, #2232)FileField
. (#2172)ViewSet.as_view()
. (#2175)allow_blank
to ChoiceField
. (#2184, #2239)fields
on serializer is not a list of strings. (#2193, #2213)validated_attrs
argument renamed to validated_data
in Serializer
create()
/update()
. (#2197)fields
on serializer is not a list of strings. (#2213)Date: 1st December 2014
+For full details see the 3.0 release announcement.
+For older release notes, please see the version 2.x documentation.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +++Software ecosystems […] establish a community that further accelerates the sharing of knowledge, content, issues, expertise and skills.
+— Jan Bosch.
+
Third Party Packages allow developers to share code that extends the functionality of Django REST framework, in order to support additional use-cases.
+We support, encourage and strongly favor the creation of Third Party Packages to encapsulate new behavior rather than adding additional functionality directly to Django REST Framework.
+We aim to make creating third party packages as easy as possible, whilst keeping a simple and well maintained core API. By promoting third party packages we ensure that the responsibility for a package remains with its author. If a package proves suitably popular it can always be considered for inclusion into the core REST framework.
+If you have an idea for a new feature please consider how it may be packaged as a Third Party Package. We're always happy to discuss ideas on the Mailing List.
+You can use this cookiecutter template for creating reusable Django REST Framework packages quickly. Cookiecutter creates projects from project templates. While optional, this cookiecutter template includes best practices from Django REST framework and other packages, as well as a Travis CI configuration, Tox configuration, and a sane setup.py for easy PyPI registration/distribution.
+Note: Let us know if you have an alternate cookiecutter package so we can also link to it.
+To run the initial cookiecutter command, you'll first need to install the Python cookiecutter
package.
$ pip install cookiecutter
+
+Once cookiecutter
is installed just run the following to create a new project.
$ cookiecutter gh:jpadilla/cookiecutter-django-rest-framework
+
+You'll be prompted for some questions, answer them, then it'll create your Python package in the current working directory based on those values.
+full_name (default is "Your full name here")? Johnny Appleseed
+email (default is "you@example.com")? jappleseed@example.com
+github_username (default is "yourname")? jappleseed
+pypi_project_name (default is "dj-package")? djangorestframework-custom-auth
+repo_name (default is "dj-package")? django-rest-framework-custom-auth
+app_name (default is "djpackage")? custom_auth
+project_short_description (default is "Your project description goes here")?
+year (default is "2014")?
+version (default is "0.1.0")?
+
+To put your project up on GitHub, you'll need a repository for it to live in. You can create a new repository here. If you need help, check out the Create A Repo article on GitHub.
+We recommend using Travis CI, a hosted continuous integration service which integrates well with GitHub and is free for public repositories.
+To get started with Travis CI, sign in with your GitHub account. Once you're signed in, go to your profile page and enable the service hook for the repository you want.
+If you use the cookiecutter template, your project will already contain a .travis.yml
file which Travis CI will use to build your project and run tests. By default, builds are triggered every time you push to your repository or create Pull Request.
Once you've got at least a prototype working and tests running, you should publish it on PyPI to allow others to install it via pip
.
You must register an account before publishing to PyPI.
+To register your package on PyPI run the following command.
+$ python setup.py register
+
+If this is the first time publishing to PyPI, you'll be prompted to login.
+Note: Before publishing you'll need to make sure you have the latest pip that supports wheel
as well as install the wheel
package.
$ pip install --upgrade pip
+$ pip install wheel
+
+After this, every time you want to release a new version on PyPI just run the following command.
+$ python setup.py publish
+You probably want to also tag the version now:
+ git tag -a {0} -m 'version 0.1.0'
+ git push --tags
+
+After releasing a new version to PyPI, it's always a good idea to tag the version and make available as a GitHub Release.
+We recommend to follow Semantic Versioning for your package's versions.
+The cookiecutter template assumes a set of supported versions will be provided for Python and Django. Make sure you correctly update your requirements, docs, tox.ini
, .travis.yml
, and setup.py
to match the set of versions you wish to support.
The cookiecutter template includes a runtests.py
which uses the pytest
package as a test runner.
Before running, you'll need to install a couple test requirements.
+$ pip install -r requirements.txt
+
+Once requirements installed, you can run runtests.py
.
$ ./runtests.py
+
+Run using a more concise output style.
+$ ./runtests.py -q
+
+Run the tests using a more concise output style, no coverage, no flake8.
+$ ./runtests.py --fast
+
+Don't run the flake8 code linting.
+$ ./runtests.py --nolint
+
+Only run the flake8 code linting, don't run the tests.
+$ ./runtests.py --lintonly
+
+Run the tests for a given test case.
+$ ./runtests.py MyTestCase
+
+Run the tests for a given test method.
+$ ./runtests.py MyTestCase.test_this_method
+
+Shorter form to run the tests for a given test method.
+$ ./runtests.py test_this_method
+
+To run your tests against multiple versions of Python as different versions of requirements such as Django we recommend using tox
. Tox is a generic virtualenv management and test command line tool.
First, install tox
globally.
$ pip install tox
+
+To run tox
, just simply run:
$ tox
+
+To run a particular tox
environment:
$ tox -e envlist
+
+envlist
is a comma-separated value to that specifies the environments to run tests against. To view a list of all possible test environments, run:
$ tox -l
+
+Sometimes, in order to ensure your code works on various different versions of Django, Python or third party libraries, you'll need to run slightly different code depending on the environment. Any code that branches in this way should be isolated into a compat.py
module, and should provide a single common interface that the rest of the codebase can use.
Check out Django REST framework's compat.py for an example.
+Once your package is decently documented and available on PyPI, you might want share it with others that might find it useful.
+We suggest adding your package to the REST Framework grid on Django Packages.
+Create a Pull Request or Issue on GitHub, and we'll add a link to it from the main REST framework documentation. You can add your package under Third party packages of the API Guide section that best applies, like Authentication or Permissions. You can also link your package under the Third Party Packages section.
+You can also let others know about your package through the discussion group.
+Django REST Framework has a growing community of developers, packages, and resources.
+Check out a grid detailing all the packages and ecosystem around Django REST Framework at Django Packages.
+To submit new content, open an issue or create a pull request.
+ImageField
that makes it easy to serve images in multiple sizes/renditions from a single field. For DRF-specific implementation docs, click here.ModelViewSet
's Queryset
in a clean, simple and configurable way. It also supports validations on incoming query params and their values.DjangoObjectPermissionsFilter
previously found in DRF.ImageField
that makes it easy to serve images in multiple sizes/renditions from a single field. For DRF-specific implementation docs, click here.There are a wide range of resources available for learning and using Django REST framework. We try to keep a comprehensive list available here.
+Want your Django REST Framework talk/tutorial/article to be added to our website? Or know of a resource that's not yet included here? Please submit a pull request or email us!
+ + +A schema is a machine-readable document that describes the available API +endpoints, their URLS, and what operations they support.
+Schemas can be a useful tool for auto-generated documentation, and can also +be used to drive dynamic client libraries that can interact with the API.
+In order to provide schema support REST framework uses Core API.
+Core API is a document specification for describing APIs. It is used to provide +an internal representation format of the available endpoints and possible +interactions that an API exposes. It can either be used server-side, or +client-side.
+When used server-side, Core API allows an API to support rendering to a wide +range of schema or hypermedia formats.
+When used client-side, Core API allows for dynamically driven client libraries +that can interact with any API that exposes a supported schema or hypermedia +format.
+REST framework supports either explicitly defined schema views, or +automatically generated schemas. Since we're using viewsets and routers, +we can simply use the automatic schema generation.
+You'll need to install the coreapi
python package in order to include an
+API schema, and pyyaml
to render the schema into the commonly used
+YAML-based OpenAPI format.
$ pip install coreapi pyyaml
+
+We can now include a schema for our API, by including an autogenerated schema +view in our URL configuration.
+from rest_framework.schemas import get_schema_view
+
+schema_view = get_schema_view(title='Pastebin API')
+
+urlpatterns = [
+ path('schema/', schema_view),
+ ...
+]
+
+
+If you visit the /schema/
endpoint in a browser you should now see corejson
+representation become available as an option.
We can also request the schema from the command line, by specifying the desired
+content type in the Accept
header.
$ http http://127.0.0.1:8000/schema/ Accept:application/coreapi+json
+HTTP/1.0 200 OK
+Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
+Content-Type: application/coreapi+json
+
+{
+ "_meta": {
+ "title": "Pastebin API"
+ },
+ "_type": "document",
+ ...
+
+The default output style is to use the Core JSON encoding.
+Other schema formats, such as Open API (formerly Swagger) are +also supported.
+Now that our API is exposing a schema endpoint, we can use a dynamic client +library to interact with the API. To demonstrate this, let's use the +Core API command line client.
+The command line client is available as the coreapi-cli
package:
$ pip install coreapi-cli
+
+Now check that it is available on the command line...
+$ coreapi
+Usage: coreapi [OPTIONS] COMMAND [ARGS]...
+
+ Command line client for interacting with CoreAPI services.
+
+ Visit https://www.coreapi.org/ for more information.
+
+Options:
+ --version Display the package version number.
+ --help Show this message and exit.
+
+Commands:
+...
+
+First we'll load the API schema using the command line client.
+$ coreapi get http://127.0.0.1:8000/schema/
+<Pastebin API "http://127.0.0.1:8000/schema/">
+ snippets: {
+ highlight(id)
+ list()
+ read(id)
+ }
+ users: {
+ list()
+ read(id)
+ }
+
+We haven't authenticated yet, so right now we're only able to see the read only +endpoints, in line with how we've set up the permissions on the API.
+Let's try listing the existing snippets, using the command line client:
+$ coreapi action snippets list
+[
+ {
+ "url": "http://127.0.0.1:8000/snippets/1/",
+ "id": 1,
+ "highlight": "http://127.0.0.1:8000/snippets/1/highlight/",
+ "owner": "lucy",
+ "title": "Example",
+ "code": "print('hello, world!')",
+ "linenos": true,
+ "language": "python",
+ "style": "friendly"
+ },
+ ...
+
+Some of the API endpoints require named parameters. For example, to get back +the highlight HTML for a particular snippet we need to provide an id.
+$ coreapi action snippets highlight --param id=1
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
+
+<html>
+<head>
+ <title>Example</title>
+ ...
+
+If we want to be able to create, edit and delete snippets, we'll need to +authenticate as a valid user. In this case we'll just use basic auth.
+Make sure to replace the <username>
and <password>
below with your
+actual username and password.
$ coreapi credentials add 127.0.0.1 <username>:<password> --auth basic
+Added credentials
+127.0.0.1 "Basic <...>"
+
+Now if we fetch the schema again, we should be able to see the full +set of available interactions.
+$ coreapi reload
+Pastebin API "http://127.0.0.1:8000/schema/">
+ snippets: {
+ create(code, [title], [linenos], [language], [style])
+ delete(id)
+ highlight(id)
+ list()
+ partial_update(id, [title], [code], [linenos], [language], [style])
+ read(id)
+ update(id, code, [title], [linenos], [language], [style])
+ }
+ users: {
+ list()
+ read(id)
+ }
+
+We're now able to interact with these endpoints. For example, to create a new +snippet:
+$ coreapi action snippets create --param title="Example" --param code="print('hello, world')"
+{
+ "url": "http://127.0.0.1:8000/snippets/7/",
+ "id": 7,
+ "highlight": "http://127.0.0.1:8000/snippets/7/highlight/",
+ "owner": "lucy",
+ "title": "Example",
+ "code": "print('hello, world')",
+ "linenos": false,
+ "language": "python",
+ "style": "friendly"
+}
+
+And to delete a snippet:
+$ coreapi action snippets delete --param id=7
+
+As well as the command line client, developers can also interact with your +API using client libraries. The Python client library is the first of these +to be available, and a Javascript client library is planned to be released +soon.
+For more details on customizing schema generation and using Core API +client libraries you'll need to refer to the full documentation.
+With an incredibly small amount of code, we've now got a complete pastebin Web API, which is fully web browsable, includes a schema-driven client library, and comes complete with authentication, per-object permissions, and multiple renderer formats.
+We've walked through each step of the design process, and seen how if we need to customize anything we can gradually work our way down to simply using regular Django views.
+You can review the final tutorial code on GitHub, or try out a live example in the sandbox.
+We've reached the end of our tutorial. If you want to get more involved in the REST framework project, here are a few places you can start:
+Now go build awesome things.
+ + +The built-in API documentation includes:
+The coreapi
library is required as a dependency for the API docs. Make sure
+to install the latest version. The Pygments
and Markdown
libraries
+are optional but recommended.
To install the API documentation, you'll need to include it in your project's URLconf:
+from rest_framework.documentation import include_docs_urls
+
+urlpatterns = [
+ ...
+ url(r'^docs/', include_docs_urls(title='My API title'))
+]
+
+This will include two different views:
+/docs/
- The documentation page itself./docs/schema.js
- A JavaScript resource that exposes the API schema.Note: By default include_docs_urls
configures the underlying SchemaView
to generate public schemas.
+This means that views will not be instantiated with a request
instance. i.e. Inside the view self.request
will be None
.
To be compatible with this behaviour, methods (such as get_serializer
or get_serializer_class
etc.) which inspect self.request
or, particularly, self.request.user
may need to be adjusted to handle this case.
You may ensure views are given a request
instance by calling include_docs_urls
with public=False
:
from rest_framework.documentation import include_docs_urls
+
+urlpatterns = [
+ ...
+ # Generate schema with valid `request` instance:
+ url(r'^docs/', include_docs_urls(title='My API title', public=False))
+]
+
+You can document your views by including docstrings that describe each of the available actions. +For example:
+class UserList(generics.ListAPIView):
+ """
+ Return a list of all the existing users.
+ """
+
+If a view supports multiple methods, you should split your documentation using method:
style delimiters.
class UserList(generics.ListCreateAPIView):
+ """
+ get:
+ Return a list of all the existing users.
+
+ post:
+ Create a new user instance.
+ """
+
+When using viewsets, you should use the relevant action names as delimiters.
+class UserViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
+ """
+ retrieve:
+ Return the given user.
+
+ list:
+ Return a list of all the existing users.
+
+ create:
+ Create a new user instance.
+ """
+
+Custom actions on viewsets can also be documented in a similar way using the method names +as delimiters or by attaching the documentation to action mapping methods.
+class UserViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewset):
+ ...
+
+ @action(detail=False, methods=['get', 'post'])
+ def some_action(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
+ """
+ get:
+ A description of the get method on the custom action.
+
+ post:
+ A description of the post method on the custom action.
+ """
+
+ @some_action.mapping.put
+ def put_some_action():
+ """
+ A description of the put method on the custom action.
+ """
+
+documentation
API ReferenceThe rest_framework.documentation
module provides three helper functions to help configure the interactive API documentation, include_docs_urls
(usage shown above), get_docs_view
and get_schemajs_view
.
include_docs_urls
employs get_docs_view
and get_schemajs_view
to generate the url patterns for the documentation page and JavaScript resource that exposes the API schema respectively. They expose the following options for customisation. (get_docs_view
and get_schemajs_view
ultimately call rest_frameworks.schemas.get_schema_view()
, see the Schemas docs for more options there.)
include_docs_urls
title
: Default None
. May be used to provide a descriptive title for the schema definition.description
: Default None
. May be used to provide a description for the schema definition.schema_url
: Default None
. May be used to pass a canonical base URL for the schema.public
: Default True
. Should the schema be considered public? If True
schema is generated without a request
instance being passed to views.patterns
: Default None
. A list of URLs to inspect when generating the schema. If None
project's URL conf will be used.generator_class
: Default rest_framework.schemas.SchemaGenerator
. May be used to specify a SchemaGenerator
subclass to be passed to the SchemaView
.authentication_classes
: Default api_settings.DEFAULT_AUTHENTICATION_CLASSES
. May be used to pass custom authentication classes to the SchemaView
.permission_classes
: Default api_settings.DEFAULT_PERMISSION_CLASSES
May be used to pass custom permission classes to the SchemaView
.renderer_classes
: Default None
. May be used to pass custom renderer classes to the SchemaView
.get_docs_view
title
: Default None
. May be used to provide a descriptive title for the schema definition.description
: Default None
. May be used to provide a description for the schema definition.schema_url
: Default None
. May be used to pass a canonical base URL for the schema.public
: Default True
. If True
schema is generated without a request
instance being passed to views.patterns
: Default None
. A list of URLs to inspect when generating the schema. If None
project's URL conf will be used.generator_class
: Default rest_framework.schemas.SchemaGenerator
. May be used to specify a SchemaGenerator
subclass to be passed to the SchemaView
.authentication_classes
: Default api_settings.DEFAULT_AUTHENTICATION_CLASSES
. May be used to pass custom authentication classes to the SchemaView
.permission_classes
: Default api_settings.DEFAULT_PERMISSION_CLASSES
. May be used to pass custom permission classes to the SchemaView
.renderer_classes
: Default None
. May be used to pass custom renderer classes to the SchemaView
. If None
the SchemaView
will be configured with DocumentationRenderer
and CoreJSONRenderer
renderers, corresponding to the (default) html
and corejson
formats.get_schemajs_view
title
: Default None
. May be used to provide a descriptive title for the schema definition.description
: Default None
. May be used to provide a description for the schema definition.schema_url
: Default None
. May be used to pass a canonical base URL for the schema.public
: Default True
. If True
schema is generated without a request
instance being passed to views.patterns
: Default None
. A list of URLs to inspect when generating the schema. If None
project's URL conf will be used.generator_class
: Default rest_framework.schemas.SchemaGenerator
. May be used to specify a SchemaGenerator
subclass to be passed to the SchemaView
.authentication_classes
: Default api_settings.DEFAULT_AUTHENTICATION_CLASSES
. May be used to pass custom authentication classes to the SchemaView
.permission_classes
: Default api_settings.DEFAULT_PERMISSION_CLASSES
May be used to pass custom permission classes to the SchemaView
.The built-in API documentation includes automatically generated code samples for +each of the available API client libraries.
+You may customise these samples by subclassing DocumentationRenderer
, setting
+languages
to the list of languages you wish to support:
from rest_framework.renderers import DocumentationRenderer
+
+
+class CustomRenderer(DocumentationRenderer):
+ languages = ['ruby', 'go']
+
+For each language you need to provide an intro
template, detailing installation instructions and such,
+plus a generic template for making API requests, that can be filled with individual request details.
+See the templates for the bundled languages for examples.
Use of CoreAPI-based schemas were deprecated with the introduction of native OpenAPI-based schema generation in Django REST Framework v3.10.
+See the Version 3.10 Release Announcement for more details.
+You can continue to use CoreAPI schemas by setting the appropriate default schema class:
+# In settings.py
+REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ 'DEFAULT_SCHEMA_CLASS': 'rest_framework.schemas.coreapi.AutoSchema',
+}
+
+
+Under-the-hood, any subclass of coreapi.AutoSchema
here will trigger use of the old CoreAPI schemas.
+Otherwise you will automatically be opted-in to the new OpenAPI schemas.
All CoreAPI related code will be removed in Django REST Framework v3.12. Switch to OpenAPI schemas by then.
+For reference this folder contains the old CoreAPI related documentation:
+ + + +++A machine-readable [schema] describes what resources are available via the API, what their URLs are, how they are represented and what operations they support.
+— Heroku, JSON Schema for the Heroku Platform API
+
API schemas are a useful tool that allow for a range of use cases, including +generating reference documentation, or driving dynamic client libraries that +can interact with your API.
+You'll need to install the coreapi
package in order to add schema support
+for REST framework. You probably also want to install pyyaml
, so that you
+can render the schema into the commonly used YAML-based OpenAPI format.
pip install coreapi pyyaml
+
+There are two different ways you can serve a schema description for your API.
+generateschema
management commandTo generate a static API schema, use the generateschema
management command.
$ python manage.py generateschema > schema.yml
+
+
+Once you've generated a schema in this way you can annotate it with any +additional information that cannot be automatically inferred by the schema +generator.
+You might want to check your API schema into version control and update it +with each new release, or serve the API schema from your site's static media.
+get_schema_view
To add a dynamically generated schema view to your API, use get_schema_view
.
from rest_framework.schemas import get_schema_view
+
+schema_view = get_schema_view(title="Example API")
+
+urlpatterns = [
+ url('^schema$', schema_view),
+ ...
+]
+
+
+See below for more details on customizing a +dynamically generated schema view.
+REST framework uses Core API in order to model schema information in +a format-independent representation. This information can then be rendered +into various different schema formats, or used to generate API documentation.
+When using Core API, a schema is represented as a Document
which is the
+top-level container object for information about the API. Available API
+interactions are represented using Link
objects. Each link includes a URL,
+HTTP method, and may include a list of Field
instances, which describe any
+parameters that may be accepted by the API endpoint. The Link
and Field
+instances may also include descriptions, that allow an API schema to be
+rendered into user documentation.
Here's an example of an API description that includes a single search
+endpoint:
coreapi.Document(
+ title='Flight Search API',
+ url='https://api.example.org/',
+ content={
+ 'search': coreapi.Link(
+ url='/search/',
+ action='get',
+ fields=[
+ coreapi.Field(
+ name='from',
+ required=True,
+ location='query',
+ description='City name or airport code.'
+ ),
+ coreapi.Field(
+ name='to',
+ required=True,
+ location='query',
+ description='City name or airport code.'
+ ),
+ coreapi.Field(
+ name='date',
+ required=True,
+ location='query',
+ description='Flight date in "YYYY-MM-DD" format.'
+ )
+ ],
+ description='Return flight availability and prices.'
+ )
+ }
+)
+
+In order to be presented in an HTTP response, the internal representation +has to be rendered into the actual bytes that are used in the response.
+REST framework includes a few different renderers that you can use for +encoding the API schema.
+renderers.OpenAPIRenderer
- Renders into YAML-based OpenAPI, the most widely used API schema format.renderers.JSONOpenAPIRenderer
- Renders into JSON-based OpenAPI.renderers.CoreJSONRenderer
- Renders into Core JSON, a format designed for
+use with the coreapi
client library.Core JSON is designed as a canonical format for use with Core API.
+REST framework includes a renderer class for handling this media type, which
+is available as renderers.CoreJSONRenderer
.
It's worth pointing out here that Core API can also be used to model hypermedia +responses, which present an alternative interaction style to API schemas.
+With an API schema, the entire available interface is presented up-front +as a single endpoint. Responses to individual API endpoints are then typically +presented as plain data, without any further interactions contained in each +response.
+With Hypermedia, the client is instead presented with a document containing +both data and available interactions. Each interaction results in a new +document, detailing both the current state and the available interactions.
+Further information and support on building Hypermedia APIs with REST framework +is planned for a future version.
+REST framework includes functionality for auto-generating a schema, +or allows you to specify one explicitly.
+To manually specify a schema you create a Core API Document
, similar to the
+example above.
schema = coreapi.Document(
+ title='Flight Search API',
+ content={
+ ...
+ }
+)
+
+Automatic schema generation is provided by the SchemaGenerator
class.
SchemaGenerator
processes a list of routed URL patterns and compiles the
+appropriately structured Core API Document.
Basic usage is just to provide the title for your schema and call
+get_schema()
:
generator = schemas.SchemaGenerator(title='Flight Search API')
+schema = generator.get_schema()
+
+By default, view introspection is performed by an AutoSchema
instance
+accessible via the schema
attribute on APIView
. This provides the
+appropriate Core API Link
object for the view, request method and path:
auto_schema = view.schema
+coreapi_link = auto_schema.get_link(...)
+
+(In compiling the schema, SchemaGenerator
calls view.schema.get_link()
for
+each view, allowed method and path.)
Note: For basic APIView
subclasses, default introspection is essentially
+limited to the URL kwarg path parameters. For GenericAPIView
+subclasses, which includes all the provided class based views, AutoSchema
will
+attempt to introspect serializer, pagination and filter fields, as well as
+provide richer path field descriptions. (The key hooks here are the relevant
+GenericAPIView
attributes and methods: get_serializer
, pagination_class
,
+filter_backends
and so on.)
To customise the Link
generation you may:
Instantiate AutoSchema
on your view with the manual_fields
kwarg:
from rest_framework.views import APIView
+from rest_framework.schemas import AutoSchema
+
+class CustomView(APIView):
+ ...
+ schema = AutoSchema(
+ manual_fields=[
+ coreapi.Field("extra_field", ...),
+ ]
+ )
+
+This allows extension for the most common case without subclassing.
+Provide an AutoSchema
subclass with more complex customisation:
from rest_framework.views import APIView
+from rest_framework.schemas import AutoSchema
+
+class CustomSchema(AutoSchema):
+ def get_link(...):
+ # Implement custom introspection here (or in other sub-methods)
+
+class CustomView(APIView):
+ ...
+ schema = CustomSchema()
+
+This provides complete control over view introspection.
+Instantiate ManualSchema
on your view, providing the Core API Fields
for
+ the view explicitly:
from rest_framework.views import APIView
+from rest_framework.schemas import ManualSchema
+
+class CustomView(APIView):
+ ...
+ schema = ManualSchema(fields=[
+ coreapi.Field(
+ "first_field",
+ required=True,
+ location="path",
+ schema=coreschema.String()
+ ),
+ coreapi.Field(
+ "second_field",
+ required=True,
+ location="path",
+ schema=coreschema.String()
+ ),
+ ])
+
+This allows manually specifying the schema for some views whilst maintaining +automatic generation elsewhere.
+You may disable schema generation for a view by setting schema
to None
:
class CustomView(APIView):
+ ...
+ schema = None # Will not appear in schema
+
+This also applies to extra actions for ViewSet
s:
class CustomViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
+
+ @action(detail=True, schema=None)
+ def extra_action(self, request, pk=None):
+ ...
+
+Note: For full details on SchemaGenerator
plus the AutoSchema
and
+ManualSchema
descriptors see the API Reference below.
There are a few different ways to add a schema view to your API, depending on +exactly what you need.
+The simplest way to include a schema in your project is to use the
+get_schema_view()
function.
from rest_framework.schemas import get_schema_view
+
+schema_view = get_schema_view(title="Server Monitoring API")
+
+urlpatterns = [
+ url('^$', schema_view),
+ ...
+]
+
+Once the view has been added, you'll be able to make API requests to retrieve +the auto-generated schema definition.
+$ http http://127.0.0.1:8000/ Accept:application/coreapi+json
+HTTP/1.0 200 OK
+Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
+Content-Type: application/vnd.coreapi+json
+
+{
+ "_meta": {
+ "title": "Server Monitoring API"
+ },
+ "_type": "document",
+ ...
+}
+
+The arguments to get_schema_view()
are:
title
May be used to provide a descriptive title for the schema definition.
+url
May be used to pass a canonical URL for the schema.
+schema_view = get_schema_view(
+ title='Server Monitoring API',
+ url='https://www.example.org/api/'
+)
+
+urlconf
A string representing the import path to the URL conf that you want +to generate an API schema for. This defaults to the value of Django's +ROOT_URLCONF setting.
+schema_view = get_schema_view(
+ title='Server Monitoring API',
+ url='https://www.example.org/api/',
+ urlconf='myproject.urls'
+)
+
+renderer_classes
May be used to pass the set of renderer classes that can be used to render the API root endpoint.
+from rest_framework.schemas import get_schema_view
+from rest_framework.renderers import JSONOpenAPIRenderer
+
+schema_view = get_schema_view(
+ title='Server Monitoring API',
+ url='https://www.example.org/api/',
+ renderer_classes=[JSONOpenAPIRenderer]
+)
+
+patterns
List of url patterns to limit the schema introspection to. If you only want the myproject.api
urls
+to be exposed in the schema:
schema_url_patterns = [
+ url(r'^api/', include('myproject.api.urls')),
+]
+
+schema_view = get_schema_view(
+ title='Server Monitoring API',
+ url='https://www.example.org/api/',
+ patterns=schema_url_patterns,
+)
+
+generator_class
May be used to specify a SchemaGenerator
subclass to be passed to the
+SchemaView
.
authentication_classes
May be used to specify the list of authentication classes that will apply to the schema endpoint.
+Defaults to settings.DEFAULT_AUTHENTICATION_CLASSES
permission_classes
May be used to specify the list of permission classes that will apply to the schema endpoint.
+Defaults to settings.DEFAULT_PERMISSION_CLASSES
If you need a little more control than the get_schema_view()
shortcut gives you,
+then you can use the SchemaGenerator
class directly to auto-generate the
+Document
instance, and to return that from a view.
This option gives you the flexibility of setting up the schema endpoint +with whatever behaviour you want. For example, you can apply different +permission, throttling, or authentication policies to the schema endpoint.
+Here's an example of using SchemaGenerator
together with a view to
+return the schema.
views.py:
+from rest_framework.decorators import api_view, renderer_classes
+from rest_framework import renderers, response, schemas
+
+generator = schemas.SchemaGenerator(title='Bookings API')
+
+@api_view()
+@renderer_classes([renderers.OpenAPIRenderer])
+def schema_view(request):
+ schema = generator.get_schema(request)
+ return response.Response(schema)
+
+urls.py:
+urlpatterns = [
+ url('/', schema_view),
+ ...
+]
+
+You can also serve different schemas to different users, depending on the +permissions they have available. This approach can be used to ensure that +unauthenticated requests are presented with a different schema to +authenticated requests, or to ensure that different parts of the API are +made visible to different users depending on their role.
+In order to present a schema with endpoints filtered by user permissions,
+you need to pass the request
argument to the get_schema()
method, like so:
@api_view()
+@renderer_classes([renderers.OpenAPIRenderer])
+def schema_view(request):
+ generator = schemas.SchemaGenerator(title='Bookings API')
+ return response.Response(generator.get_schema(request=request))
+
+An alternative to the auto-generated approach is to specify the API schema
+explicitly, by declaring a Document
object in your codebase. Doing so is a
+little more work, but ensures that you have full control over the schema
+representation.
import coreapi
+from rest_framework.decorators import api_view, renderer_classes
+from rest_framework import renderers, response
+
+schema = coreapi.Document(
+ title='Bookings API',
+ content={
+ ...
+ }
+)
+
+@api_view()
+@renderer_classes([renderers.OpenAPIRenderer])
+def schema_view(request):
+ return response.Response(schema)
+
+One common usage of API schemas is to use them to build documentation pages.
+The schema generation in REST framework uses docstrings to automatically +populate descriptions in the schema document.
+These descriptions will be based on:
+An APIView
, with an explicit method docstring.
class ListUsernames(APIView):
+ def get(self, request):
+ """
+ Return a list of all user names in the system.
+ """
+ usernames = [user.username for user in User.objects.all()]
+ return Response(usernames)
+
+A ViewSet
, with an explicit action docstring.
class ListUsernames(ViewSet):
+ def list(self, request):
+ """
+ Return a list of all user names in the system.
+ """
+ usernames = [user.username for user in User.objects.all()]
+ return Response(usernames)
+
+A generic view with sections in the class docstring, using single-line style.
+class UserList(generics.ListCreateAPIView):
+ """
+ get: List all the users.
+ post: Create a new user.
+ """
+ queryset = User.objects.all()
+ serializer_class = UserSerializer
+ permission_classes = [IsAdminUser]
+
+A generic viewset with sections in the class docstring, using multi-line style.
+class UserViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
+ """
+ API endpoint that allows users to be viewed or edited.
+
+ retrieve:
+ Return a user instance.
+
+ list:
+ Return all users, ordered by most recently joined.
+ """
+ queryset = User.objects.all().order_by('-date_joined')
+ serializer_class = UserSerializer
+
+A class that walks a list of routed URL patterns, requests the schema for each view, +and collates the resulting CoreAPI Document.
+Typically you'll instantiate SchemaGenerator
with a single argument, like so:
generator = SchemaGenerator(title='Stock Prices API')
+
+Arguments:
+title
required - The name of the API.url
- The root URL of the API schema. This option is not required unless the schema is included under path prefix.patterns
- A list of URLs to inspect when generating the schema. Defaults to the project's URL conf.urlconf
- A URL conf module name to use when generating the schema. Defaults to settings.ROOT_URLCONF
.Returns a coreapi.Document
instance that represents the API schema.
@api_view
+@renderer_classes([renderers.OpenAPIRenderer])
+def schema_view(request):
+ generator = schemas.SchemaGenerator(title='Bookings API')
+ return Response(generator.get_schema())
+
+The request
argument is optional, and may be used if you want to apply per-user
+permissions to the resulting schema generation.
Return a nested dictionary containing all the links that should be included in the API schema.
+This is a good point to override if you want to modify the resulting structure of the generated schema, +as you can build a new dictionary with a different layout.
+A class that deals with introspection of individual views for schema generation.
+AutoSchema
is attached to APIView
via the schema
attribute.
The AutoSchema
constructor takes a single keyword argument manual_fields
.
manual_fields
: a list
of coreapi.Field
instances that will be added to
+the generated fields. Generated fields with a matching name
will be overwritten.
class CustomView(APIView):
+ schema = AutoSchema(manual_fields=[
+ coreapi.Field(
+ "my_extra_field",
+ required=True,
+ location="path",
+ schema=coreschema.String()
+ ),
+ ])
+
+For more advanced customisation subclass AutoSchema
to customise schema generation.
class CustomViewSchema(AutoSchema):
+ """
+ Overrides `get_link()` to provide Custom Behavior X
+ """
+
+ def get_link(self, path, method, base_url):
+ link = super().get_link(path, method, base_url)
+ # Do something to customize link here...
+ return link
+
+class MyView(APIView):
+ schema = CustomViewSchema()
+
+The following methods are available to override.
+Returns a coreapi.Link
instance corresponding to the given view.
This is the main entry point. +You can override this if you need to provide custom behaviors for particular views.
+Returns a string to use as the link description. By default this is based on the +view docstring as described in the "Schemas as Documentation" section above.
+Returns a string to indicate the encoding for any request body, when interacting
+with the given view. Eg. 'application/json'
. May return a blank string for views
+that do not expect a request body.
Return a list of coreapi.Field()
instances. One for each path parameter in the URL.
Return a list of coreapi.Field()
instances. One for each field in the serializer class used by the view.
Return a list of coreapi.Field()
instances, as returned by the get_schema_fields()
method on any pagination class used by the view.
Return a list of coreapi.Field()
instances, as returned by the get_schema_fields()
method of any filter classes used by the view.
Return a list of coreapi.Field()
instances to be added to or replace generated fields. Defaults to (optional) manual_fields
passed to AutoSchema
constructor.
May be overridden to customise manual fields by path
or method
. For example, a per-method adjustment may look like this:
def get_manual_fields(self, path, method):
+ """Example adding per-method fields."""
+
+ extra_fields = []
+ if method=='GET':
+ extra_fields = # ... list of extra fields for GET ...
+ if method=='POST':
+ extra_fields = # ... list of extra fields for POST ...
+
+ manual_fields = super().get_manual_fields(path, method)
+ return manual_fields + extra_fields
+
+
+Utility staticmethod
. Encapsulates logic to add or replace fields from a list
+by Field.name
. May be overridden to adjust replacement criteria.
Allows manually providing a list of coreapi.Field
instances for the schema,
+plus an optional description.
class MyView(APIView):
+ schema = ManualSchema(fields=[
+ coreapi.Field(
+ "first_field",
+ required=True,
+ location="path",
+ schema=coreschema.String()
+ ),
+ coreapi.Field(
+ "second_field",
+ required=True,
+ location="path",
+ schema=coreschema.String()
+ ),
+ ]
+ )
+
+The ManualSchema
constructor takes two arguments:
fields
: A list of coreapi.Field
instances. Required.
description
: A string description. Optional.
encoding
: Default None
. A string encoding, e.g application/json
. Optional.
This documentation gives a brief overview of the components within the coreapi
+package that are used to represent an API schema.
Note that these classes are imported from the coreapi
package, rather than
+from the rest_framework
package.
Represents a container for the API schema.
+title
A name for the API.
+url
A canonical URL for the API.
+content
A dictionary, containing the Link
objects that the schema contains.
In order to provide more structure to the schema, the content
dictionary
+may be nested, typically to a second level. For example:
content={
+ "bookings": {
+ "list": Link(...),
+ "create": Link(...),
+ ...
+ },
+ "venues": {
+ "list": Link(...),
+ ...
+ },
+ ...
+}
+
+Represents an individual API endpoint.
+url
The URL of the endpoint. May be a URI template, such as /users/{username}/
.
action
The HTTP method associated with the endpoint. Note that URLs that support
+more than one HTTP method, should correspond to a single Link
for each.
fields
A list of Field
instances, describing the available parameters on the input.
description
A short description of the meaning and intended usage of the endpoint.
+Represents a single input parameter on a given API endpoint.
+name
A descriptive name for the input.
+required
A boolean, indicated if the client is required to included a value, or if +the parameter can be omitted.
+location
Determines how the information is encoded into the request. Should be one of +the following strings:
+"path"
+Included in a templated URI. For example a url
value of /products/{product_code}/
could be used together with a "path"
field, to handle API inputs in a URL path such as /products/slim-fit-jeans/
.
These fields will normally correspond with named arguments in the project URL conf.
+"query"
+Included as a URL query parameter. For example ?search=sale
. Typically for GET
requests.
These fields will normally correspond with pagination and filtering controls on a view.
+"form"
+Included in the request body, as a single item of a JSON object or HTML form. For example {"colour": "blue", ...}
. Typically for POST
, PUT
and PATCH
requests. Multiple "form"
fields may be included on a single link.
These fields will normally correspond with serializer fields on a view.
+"body"
+Included as the complete request body. Typically for POST
, PUT
and PATCH
requests. No more than one "body"
field may exist on a link. May not be used together with "form"
fields.
These fields will normally correspond with views that use ListSerializer
to validate the request input, or with file upload views.
encoding
"application/json"
+JSON encoded request content. Corresponds to views using JSONParser
.
+Valid only if either one or more location="form"
fields, or a single
+location="body"
field is included on the Link
.
"multipart/form-data"
+Multipart encoded request content. Corresponds to views using MultiPartParser
.
+Valid only if one or more location="form"
fields is included on the Link
.
"application/x-www-form-urlencoded"
+URL encoded request content. Corresponds to views using FormParser
. Valid
+only if one or more location="form"
fields is included on the Link
.
"application/octet-stream"
+Binary upload request content. Corresponds to views using FileUploadParser
.
+Valid only if a location="body"
field is included on the Link
.
description
A short description of the meaning and intended usage of the input field.
+drf-yasg generates OpenAPI documents suitable for code generation - nested schemas, +named models, response bodies, enum/pattern/min/max validators, form parameters, etc.
+ + ++
Django REST framework is a powerful and flexible toolkit for building Web APIs.
+Some reasons you might want to use REST framework:
+REST framework is a collaboratively funded project. If you use +REST framework commercially we strongly encourage you to invest in its +continued development by signing up for a paid plan.
+Every single sign-up helps us make REST framework long-term financially sustainable.
+ + + + +Many thanks to all our wonderful sponsors, and in particular to our premium backers, Sentry, Stream, ESG, Rollbar, Cadre, Kloudless, Lights On Software, and Retool.
+REST framework requires the following:
+We highly recommend and only officially support the latest patch release of +each Python and Django series.
+The following packages are optional:
+Install using pip
, including any optional packages you want...
pip install djangorestframework
+pip install markdown # Markdown support for the browsable API.
+pip install django-filter # Filtering support
+
+...or clone the project from github.
+git clone https://github.com/encode/django-rest-framework
+
+Add 'rest_framework'
to your INSTALLED_APPS
setting.
INSTALLED_APPS = [
+ ...
+ 'rest_framework',
+]
+
+If you're intending to use the browsable API you'll probably also want to add REST framework's login and logout views. Add the following to your root urls.py
file.
urlpatterns = [
+ ...
+ url(r'^api-auth/', include('rest_framework.urls'))
+]
+
+Note that the URL path can be whatever you want.
+Let's take a look at a quick example of using REST framework to build a simple model-backed API.
+We'll create a read-write API for accessing information on the users of our project.
+Any global settings for a REST framework API are kept in a single configuration dictionary named REST_FRAMEWORK
. Start off by adding the following to your settings.py
module:
REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ # Use Django's standard `django.contrib.auth` permissions,
+ # or allow read-only access for unauthenticated users.
+ 'DEFAULT_PERMISSION_CLASSES': [
+ 'rest_framework.permissions.DjangoModelPermissionsOrAnonReadOnly'
+ ]
}
+
+Don't forget to make sure you've also added rest_framework
to your INSTALLED_APPS
.
We're ready to create our API now.
+Here's our project's root urls.py
module:
from django.conf.urls import url, include
+from django.contrib.auth.models import User
+from rest_framework import routers, serializers, viewsets
+# Serializers define the API representation.
+class UserSerializer(serializers.HyperlinkedModelSerializer):
+ class Meta:
+ model = User
+ fields = ['url', 'username', 'email', 'is_staff']
-/*
- * Footer
- */
-.mastfoot {
- color: rgba(255, 255, 255, .5);
-}
- .bd-placeholder-img {
- font-size: 1.125rem;
- text-anchor: middle;
- -webkit-user-select: none;
- -moz-user-select: none;
- -ms-user-select: none;
- user-select: none;
- }
+# ViewSets define the view behavior.
+class UserViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
+ queryset = User.objects.all()
+ serializer_class = UserSerializer
- @media (min-width: 768px) {
- .bd-placeholder-img-lg {
- font-size: 3.5rem;
- }
- }
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+# Routers provide an easy way of automatically determining the URL conf.
+router = routers.DefaultRouter()
+router.register(r'users', UserViewSet)
-
- George Floyd
- Natosha McDade, Yassin Mohamed, Finan H. Berhe, Sean Reed, Steven Demarco Taylor, Breonna Taylor, Ariane McCree, Terrance Franklin, Miles Hall, Darius Tarver, William Green, Samuel David Mallard, Kwame Jones, De’von Bailey, Christopher Whitfield, Anthony Hill, De’Von Bailey, Eric Logan, Jamarion Robinson, Gregory Hill Jr, JaQuavion Slaton, Ryan Twyman, Brandon Webber, Jimmy Atchison, Willie McCoy, Emantic Fitzgerald Bradford J, D’ettrick Griffin, Jemel Roberson, DeAndre Ballard, Botham Shem Jean, Robert Lawrence White, Anthony Lamar Smith, Ramarley Graham, Manuel Loggins Jr, Trayvon Martin, Wendell Allen, Kendrec McDade, Larry Jackson Jr, Jonathan Ferrell, Jordan Baker, Victor White III, Dontre Hamilton, Eric Garner, John Crawford III, Michael Brown, Ezell Ford, Dante Parker, Kajieme Powell, Laquan McDonald, Akai Gurley, Tamir Rice, Rumain Brisbon, Jerame Reid, Charly Keunang, Tony Robinson, Walter Scott, Freddie Gray, Brendon Glenn, Samuel DuBose, Christian Taylor, Jamar Clark, Mario Woods, Quintonio LeGrier, Gregory Gunn, Akiel Denkins, Alton Sterling, Philando Castile, Terrence Sterling, Terence Crutcher, Keith Lamont Scott, Alfred Olango, Jordan Edwards, Stephon Clark, Danny Ray Thomas, DeJuan Guillory, Patrick Harmon, Jonathan Hart, Maurice Granton, Julius Johnson, Jamee Johnson, Michael Dean...
-
-
+# Wire up our API using automatic URL routing.
+# Additionally, we include login URLs for the browsable API.
+urlpatterns = [
+ url(r'^', include(router.urls)),
+ url(r'^api-auth/', include('rest_framework.urls', namespace='rest_framework'))
+]
+
+You can now open the API in your browser at http://127.0.0.1:8000/, and view your new 'users' API. If you use the login control in the top right corner you'll also be able to add, create and delete users from the system.
+Quickstart
+Can't wait to get started? The quickstart guide is the fastest way to get up and running, and building APIs with REST framework.
+Development
+See the Contribution guidelines for information on how to clone
+the repository, run the test suite and contribute changes back to REST
+Framework.
+Support
+For support please see the REST framework discussion group, try the #restframework
channel on irc.freenode.net
, search the IRC archives, or raise a question on Stack Overflow, making sure to include the 'django-rest-framework' tag.
+For priority support please sign up for a professional or premium sponsorship plan.
+For updates on REST framework development, you may also want to follow the author on Twitter.
+
+Security
+If you believe you’ve found something in Django REST framework which has security implications, please do not raise the issue in a public forum.
+Send a description of the issue via email to rest-framework-security@googlegroups.com. The project maintainers will then work with you to resolve any issues where required, prior to any public disclosure.
+License
+Copyright © 2011-present, Encode OSS Ltd.
+All rights reserved.
+Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
+
+-
+
Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this
+ list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+
+-
+
Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice,
+ this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation
+ and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
+
+-
+
Neither the name of the copyright holder nor the names of its
+ contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+ this software without specific prior written permission.
+
+
+THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS" AND
+ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE
+DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
+FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
+DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR
+SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER
+CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY,
+OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+
-
+
t |
t |
base_template | +Valid field types | +Additional style options | +
---|---|---|
input.html | +Any string, numeric or date/time field | +input_type, placeholder, hide_label, autofocus | +
textarea.html | +CharField |
+rows, placeholder, hide_label | +
select.html | +ChoiceField or relational field types |
+hide_label | +
radio.html | +ChoiceField or relational field types |
+inline, hide_label | +
select_multiple.html | +MultipleChoiceField or relational fields with many=True |
+hide_label | +
checkbox_multiple.html | +MultipleChoiceField or relational fields with many=True |
+inline, hide_label | +
checkbox.html | +BooleanField |
+hide_label | +
fieldset.html | +Nested serializer | +hide_label | +
list_fieldset.html | +ListField or nested serializer with many=True |
+hide_label | +
++Supporting internationalization is not optional. It must be a core feature.
+ +
REST framework ships with translatable error messages. You can make these appear in your language enabling Django's standard translation mechanisms.
+Doing so will allow you to:
+LANGUAGE_CODE
Django setting.LocaleMiddleware
included with Django. A typical usage for API clients would be to include an Accept-Language
request header.You can change the default language by using the standard Django LANGUAGE_CODE
setting:
LANGUAGE_CODE = "es-es"
+
+You can turn on per-request language requests by adding LocalMiddleware
to your MIDDLEWARE_CLASSES
setting:
MIDDLEWARE_CLASSES = [
+ ...
+ 'django.middleware.locale.LocaleMiddleware'
+]
+
+When per-request internationalization is enabled, client requests will respect the Accept-Language
header where possible. For example, let's make a request for an unsupported media type:
Request
+GET /api/users HTTP/1.1
+Accept: application/xml
+Accept-Language: es-es
+Host: example.org
+
+Response
+HTTP/1.0 406 NOT ACCEPTABLE
+
+{"detail": "No se ha podido satisfacer la solicitud de cabecera de Accept."}
+
+REST framework includes these built-in translations both for standard exception cases, and for serializer validation errors.
+Note that the translations only apply to the error strings themselves. The format of error messages, and the keys of field names will remain the same. An example 400 Bad Request
response body might look like this:
{"detail": {"username": ["Esse campo deve ser único."]}}
+
+If you want to use different string for parts of the response such as detail
and non_field_errors
then you can modify this behavior by using a custom exception handler.
By default all available languages will be supported.
+If you only wish to support a subset of the available languages, use Django's standard LANGUAGES
setting:
LANGUAGES = [
+ ('de', _('German')),
+ ('en', _('English')),
+]
+
+REST framework translations are managed online using Transifex. You can use the Transifex service to add new translation languages. The maintenance team will then ensure that these translation strings are included in the REST framework package.
+Sometimes you may need to add translation strings to your project locally. You may need to do this if:
+This guide assumes you are already familiar with how to translate a Django app. If you're not, start by reading Django's translation docs.
+If you're translating a new language you'll need to translate the existing REST framework error messages:
+Make a new folder where you want to store the internationalization resources. Add this path to your LOCALE_PATHS
setting.
Now create a subfolder for the language you want to translate. The folder should be named using locale name notation. For example: de
, pt_BR
, es_AR
.
Now copy the base translations file from the REST framework source code into your translations folder.
+Edit the django.po
file you've just copied, translating all the error messages.
Run manage.py compilemessages -l pt_BR
to make the translations
+available for Django to use. You should see a message like processing file django.po in <...>/locale/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES
.
Restart your development server to see the changes take effect.
+If you're only translating custom error messages that exist inside your project codebase you don't need to copy the REST framework source django.po
file into a LOCALE_PATHS
folder, and can instead simply run Django's standard makemessages
process.
If you want to allow per-request language preferences you'll need to include django.middleware.locale.LocaleMiddleware
in your MIDDLEWARE_CLASSES
setting.
You can find more information on how the language preference is determined in the Django documentation. For reference, the method is:
+LANGUAGE_SESSION_KEY
key in the current user’s session.Accept-Language
HTTP header.LANGUAGE_CODE
setting.For API clients the most appropriate of these will typically be to use the Accept-Language
header; Sessions and cookies will not be available unless using session authentication, and generally better practice to prefer an Accept-Language
header for API clients rather than using language URL prefixes.
++You keep using that word "REST". I do not think it means what you think it means.
+— Mike Amundsen, REST fest 2012 keynote.
+
First off, the disclaimer. The name "Django REST framework" was decided back in early 2011 and was chosen simply to sure the project would be easily found by developers. Throughout the documentation we try to use the more simple and technically correct terminology of "Web APIs".
+If you are serious about designing a Hypermedia API, you should look to resources outside of this documentation to help inform your design choices.
+The following fall into the "required reading" category.
+For a more thorough background, check out Klabnik's Hypermedia API reading list.
+REST framework is an agnostic Web API toolkit. It does help guide you towards building well-connected APIs, and makes it easy to design appropriate media types, but it does not strictly enforce any particular design style.
+It is self evident that REST framework makes it possible to build Hypermedia APIs. The browsable API that it offers is built on HTML - the hypermedia language of the web.
+REST framework also includes serialization and parser/renderer components that make it easy to build appropriate media types, hyperlinked relations for building well-connected systems, and great support for content negotiation.
+What REST framework doesn't do is give you machine readable hypermedia formats such as HAL, Collection+JSON, JSON API or HTML microformats by default, or the ability to auto-magically create fully HATEOAS style APIs that include hypermedia-based form descriptions and semantically labelled hyperlinks. Doing so would involve making opinionated choices about API design that should really remain outside of the framework's scope.
+ + +++To save HTTP requests, it may be convenient to send related documents along with the request.
+ +
Although flat data structures serve to properly delineate between the individual entities in your service, there are cases where it may be more appropriate or convenient to use nested data structures.
+Nested data structures are easy enough to work with if they're read-only - simply nest your serializer classes and you're good to go. However, there are a few more subtleties to using writable nested serializers, due to the dependencies between the various model instances, and the need to save or delete multiple instances in a single action.
+Example of a read-only nested serializer. Nothing complex to worry about here.
+class ToDoItemSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+ class Meta:
+ model = ToDoItem
+ fields = ['text', 'is_completed']
+
+class ToDoListSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+ items = ToDoItemSerializer(many=True, read_only=True)
+
+ class Meta:
+ model = ToDoList
+ fields = ['title', 'items']
+
+Some example output from our serializer.
+{
+ 'title': 'Leaving party preparations',
+ 'items': [
+ {'text': 'Compile playlist', 'is_completed': True},
+ {'text': 'Send invites', 'is_completed': False},
+ {'text': 'Clean house', 'is_completed': False}
+ ]
+}
+
+Let's take a look at updating our nested one-to-many data structure.
+This tutorial will cover creating a simple pastebin code highlighting Web API. Along the way it will introduce the various components that make up REST framework, and give you a comprehensive understanding of how everything fits together.
+The tutorial is fairly in-depth, so you should probably get a cookie and a cup of your favorite brew before getting started. If you just want a quick overview, you should head over to the quickstart documentation instead.
+Note: The code for this tutorial is available in the encode/rest-framework-tutorial repository on GitHub. The completed implementation is also online as a sandbox version for testing, available here.
+Before we do anything else we'll create a new virtual environment, using venv. This will make sure our package configuration is kept nicely isolated from any other projects we're working on.
+python3 -m venv env
+source env/bin/activate
+
+Now that we're inside a virtual environment, we can install our package requirements.
+pip install django
+pip install djangorestframework
+pip install pygments # We'll be using this for the code highlighting
+
+Note: To exit the virtual environment at any time, just type deactivate
. For more information see the venv documentation.
Okay, we're ready to get coding. +To get started, let's create a new project to work with.
+cd ~
+django-admin startproject tutorial
+cd tutorial
+
+Once that's done we can create an app that we'll use to create a simple Web API.
+python manage.py startapp snippets
+
+We'll need to add our new snippets
app and the rest_framework
app to INSTALLED_APPS
. Let's edit the tutorial/settings.py
file:
INSTALLED_APPS = [
+ ...
+ 'rest_framework',
+ 'snippets.apps.SnippetsConfig',
+]
+
+Okay, we're ready to roll.
+For the purposes of this tutorial we're going to start by creating a simple Snippet
model that is used to store code snippets. Go ahead and edit the snippets/models.py
file. Note: Good programming practices include comments. Although you will find them in our repository version of this tutorial code, we have omitted them here to focus on the code itself.
from django.db import models
+from pygments.lexers import get_all_lexers
+from pygments.styles import get_all_styles
+
+LEXERS = [item for item in get_all_lexers() if item[1]]
+LANGUAGE_CHOICES = sorted([(item[1][0], item[0]) for item in LEXERS])
+STYLE_CHOICES = sorted([(item, item) for item in get_all_styles()])
+
+
+class Snippet(models.Model):
+ created = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True)
+ title = models.CharField(max_length=100, blank=True, default='')
+ code = models.TextField()
+ linenos = models.BooleanField(default=False)
+ language = models.CharField(choices=LANGUAGE_CHOICES, default='python', max_length=100)
+ style = models.CharField(choices=STYLE_CHOICES, default='friendly', max_length=100)
+
+ class Meta:
+ ordering = ['created']
+
+We'll also need to create an initial migration for our snippet model, and sync the database for the first time.
+python manage.py makemigrations snippets
+python manage.py migrate
+
+The first thing we need to get started on our Web API is to provide a way of serializing and deserializing the snippet instances into representations such as json
. We can do this by declaring serializers that work very similar to Django's forms. Create a file in the snippets
directory named serializers.py
and add the following.
from rest_framework import serializers
+from snippets.models import Snippet, LANGUAGE_CHOICES, STYLE_CHOICES
+
+
+class SnippetSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
+ id = serializers.IntegerField(read_only=True)
+ title = serializers.CharField(required=False, allow_blank=True, max_length=100)
+ code = serializers.CharField(style={'base_template': 'textarea.html'})
+ linenos = serializers.BooleanField(required=False)
+ language = serializers.ChoiceField(choices=LANGUAGE_CHOICES, default='python')
+ style = serializers.ChoiceField(choices=STYLE_CHOICES, default='friendly')
+
+ def create(self, validated_data):
+ """
+ Create and return a new `Snippet` instance, given the validated data.
+ """
+ return Snippet.objects.create(**validated_data)
+
+ def update(self, instance, validated_data):
+ """
+ Update and return an existing `Snippet` instance, given the validated data.
+ """
+ instance.title = validated_data.get('title', instance.title)
+ instance.code = validated_data.get('code', instance.code)
+ instance.linenos = validated_data.get('linenos', instance.linenos)
+ instance.language = validated_data.get('language', instance.language)
+ instance.style = validated_data.get('style', instance.style)
+ instance.save()
+ return instance
+
+The first part of the serializer class defines the fields that get serialized/deserialized. The create()
and update()
methods define how fully fledged instances are created or modified when calling serializer.save()
A serializer class is very similar to a Django Form
class, and includes similar validation flags on the various fields, such as required
, max_length
and default
.
The field flags can also control how the serializer should be displayed in certain circumstances, such as when rendering to HTML. The {'base_template': 'textarea.html'}
flag above is equivalent to using widget=widgets.Textarea
on a Django Form
class. This is particularly useful for controlling how the browsable API should be displayed, as we'll see later in the tutorial.
We can actually also save ourselves some time by using the ModelSerializer
class, as we'll see later, but for now we'll keep our serializer definition explicit.
Before we go any further we'll familiarize ourselves with using our new Serializer class. Let's drop into the Django shell.
+python manage.py shell
+
+Okay, once we've got a few imports out of the way, let's create a couple of code snippets to work with.
+from snippets.models import Snippet
+from snippets.serializers import SnippetSerializer
+from rest_framework.renderers import JSONRenderer
+from rest_framework.parsers import JSONParser
+
+snippet = Snippet(code='foo = "bar"\n')
+snippet.save()
+
+snippet = Snippet(code='print("hello, world")\n')
+snippet.save()
+
+We've now got a few snippet instances to play with. Let's take a look at serializing one of those instances.
+serializer = SnippetSerializer(snippet)
+serializer.data
+# {'id': 2, 'title': '', 'code': 'print("hello, world")\n', 'linenos': False, 'language': 'python', 'style': 'friendly'}
+
+At this point we've translated the model instance into Python native datatypes. To finalize the serialization process we render the data into json
.
content = JSONRenderer().render(serializer.data)
+content
+# b'{"id": 2, "title": "", "code": "print(\\"hello, world\\")\\n", "linenos": false, "language": "python", "style": "friendly"}'
+
+Deserialization is similar. First we parse a stream into Python native datatypes...
+import io
+
+stream = io.BytesIO(content)
+data = JSONParser().parse(stream)
+
+...then we restore those native datatypes into a fully populated object instance.
+serializer = SnippetSerializer(data=data)
+serializer.is_valid()
+# True
+serializer.validated_data
+# OrderedDict([('title', ''), ('code', 'print("hello, world")\n'), ('linenos', False), ('language', 'python'), ('style', 'friendly')])
+serializer.save()
+# <Snippet: Snippet object>
+
+Notice how similar the API is to working with forms. The similarity should become even more apparent when we start writing views that use our serializer.
+We can also serialize querysets instead of model instances. To do so we simply add a many=True
flag to the serializer arguments.
serializer = SnippetSerializer(Snippet.objects.all(), many=True)
+serializer.data
+# [OrderedDict([('id', 1), ('title', ''), ('code', 'foo = "bar"\n'), ('linenos', False), ('language', 'python'), ('style', 'friendly')]), OrderedDict([('id', 2), ('title', ''), ('code', 'print("hello, world")\n'), ('linenos', False), ('language', 'python'), ('style', 'friendly')]), OrderedDict([('id', 3), ('title', ''), ('code', 'print("hello, world")'), ('linenos', False), ('language', 'python'), ('style', 'friendly')])]
+
+Our SnippetSerializer
class is replicating a lot of information that's also contained in the Snippet
model. It would be nice if we could keep our code a bit more concise.
In the same way that Django provides both Form
classes and ModelForm
classes, REST framework includes both Serializer
classes, and ModelSerializer
classes.
Let's look at refactoring our serializer using the ModelSerializer
class.
+Open the file snippets/serializers.py
again, and replace the SnippetSerializer
class with the following.
class SnippetSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+ class Meta:
+ model = Snippet
+ fields = ['id', 'title', 'code', 'linenos', 'language', 'style']
+
+One nice property that serializers have is that you can inspect all the fields in a serializer instance, by printing its representation. Open the Django shell with python manage.py shell
, then try the following:
from snippets.serializers import SnippetSerializer
+serializer = SnippetSerializer()
+print(repr(serializer))
+# SnippetSerializer():
+# id = IntegerField(label='ID', read_only=True)
+# title = CharField(allow_blank=True, max_length=100, required=False)
+# code = CharField(style={'base_template': 'textarea.html'})
+# linenos = BooleanField(required=False)
+# language = ChoiceField(choices=[('Clipper', 'FoxPro'), ('Cucumber', 'Gherkin'), ('RobotFramework', 'RobotFramework'), ('abap', 'ABAP'), ('ada', 'Ada')...
+# style = ChoiceField(choices=[('autumn', 'autumn'), ('borland', 'borland'), ('bw', 'bw'), ('colorful', 'colorful')...
+
+It's important to remember that ModelSerializer
classes don't do anything particularly magical, they are simply a shortcut for creating serializer classes:
create()
and update()
methods.Let's see how we can write some API views using our new Serializer class. +For the moment we won't use any of REST framework's other features, we'll just write the views as regular Django views.
+Edit the snippets/views.py
file, and add the following.
from django.http import HttpResponse, JsonResponse
+from django.views.decorators.csrf import csrf_exempt
+from rest_framework.parsers import JSONParser
+from snippets.models import Snippet
+from snippets.serializers import SnippetSerializer
+
+The root of our API is going to be a view that supports listing all the existing snippets, or creating a new snippet.
+@csrf_exempt
+def snippet_list(request):
+ """
+ List all code snippets, or create a new snippet.
+ """
+ if request.method == 'GET':
+ snippets = Snippet.objects.all()
+ serializer = SnippetSerializer(snippets, many=True)
+ return JsonResponse(serializer.data, safe=False)
+
+ elif request.method == 'POST':
+ data = JSONParser().parse(request)
+ serializer = SnippetSerializer(data=data)
+ if serializer.is_valid():
+ serializer.save()
+ return JsonResponse(serializer.data, status=201)
+ return JsonResponse(serializer.errors, status=400)
+
+Note that because we want to be able to POST to this view from clients that won't have a CSRF token we need to mark the view as csrf_exempt
. This isn't something that you'd normally want to do, and REST framework views actually use more sensible behavior than this, but it'll do for our purposes right now.
We'll also need a view which corresponds to an individual snippet, and can be used to retrieve, update or delete the snippet.
+@csrf_exempt
+def snippet_detail(request, pk):
+ """
+ Retrieve, update or delete a code snippet.
+ """
+ try:
+ snippet = Snippet.objects.get(pk=pk)
+ except Snippet.DoesNotExist:
+ return HttpResponse(status=404)
+
+ if request.method == 'GET':
+ serializer = SnippetSerializer(snippet)
+ return JsonResponse(serializer.data)
+
+ elif request.method == 'PUT':
+ data = JSONParser().parse(request)
+ serializer = SnippetSerializer(snippet, data=data)
+ if serializer.is_valid():
+ serializer.save()
+ return JsonResponse(serializer.data)
+ return JsonResponse(serializer.errors, status=400)
+
+ elif request.method == 'DELETE':
+ snippet.delete()
+ return HttpResponse(status=204)
+
+Finally we need to wire these views up. Create the snippets/urls.py
file:
from django.urls import path
+from snippets import views
+
+urlpatterns = [
+ path('snippets/', views.snippet_list),
+ path('snippets/<int:pk>/', views.snippet_detail),
+]
+
+We also need to wire up the root urlconf, in the tutorial/urls.py
file, to include our snippet app's URLs.
from django.urls import path, include
+
+urlpatterns = [
+ path('', include('snippets.urls')),
+]
+
+It's worth noting that there are a couple of edge cases we're not dealing with properly at the moment. If we send malformed json
, or if a request is made with a method that the view doesn't handle, then we'll end up with a 500 "server error" response. Still, this'll do for now.
Now we can start up a sample server that serves our snippets.
+Quit out of the shell...
+quit()
+
+...and start up Django's development server.
+python manage.py runserver
+
+Validating models...
+
+0 errors found
+Django version 1.11, using settings 'tutorial.settings'
+Development server is running at http://127.0.0.1:8000/
+Quit the server with CONTROL-C.
+
+In another terminal window, we can test the server.
+We can test our API using curl or httpie. Httpie is a user friendly http client that's written in Python. Let's install that.
+You can install httpie using pip:
+pip install httpie
+
+Finally, we can get a list of all of the snippets:
+http http://127.0.0.1:8000/snippets/
+
+HTTP/1.1 200 OK
+...
+[
+ {
+ "id": 1,
+ "title": "",
+ "code": "foo = \"bar\"\n",
+ "linenos": false,
+ "language": "python",
+ "style": "friendly"
+ },
+ {
+ "id": 2,
+ "title": "",
+ "code": "print(\"hello, world\")\n",
+ "linenos": false,
+ "language": "python",
+ "style": "friendly"
+ }
+]
+
+Or we can get a particular snippet by referencing its id:
+http http://127.0.0.1:8000/snippets/2/
+
+HTTP/1.1 200 OK
+...
+{
+ "id": 2,
+ "title": "",
+ "code": "print(\"hello, world\")\n",
+ "linenos": false,
+ "language": "python",
+ "style": "friendly"
+}
+
+Similarly, you can have the same json displayed by visiting these URLs in a web browser.
+We're doing okay so far, we've got a serialization API that feels pretty similar to Django's Forms API, and some regular Django views.
+Our API views don't do anything particularly special at the moment, beyond serving json
responses, and there are some error handling edge cases we'd still like to clean up, but it's a functioning Web API.
We'll see how we can start to improve things in part 2 of the tutorial.
+ + +From this point we're going to really start covering the core of REST framework. +Let's introduce a couple of essential building blocks.
+REST framework introduces a Request
object that extends the regular HttpRequest
, and provides more flexible request parsing. The core functionality of the Request
object is the request.data
attribute, which is similar to request.POST
, but more useful for working with Web APIs.
request.POST # Only handles form data. Only works for 'POST' method.
+request.data # Handles arbitrary data. Works for 'POST', 'PUT' and 'PATCH' methods.
+
+REST framework also introduces a Response
object, which is a type of TemplateResponse
that takes unrendered content and uses content negotiation to determine the correct content type to return to the client.
return Response(data) # Renders to content type as requested by the client.
+
+Using numeric HTTP status codes in your views doesn't always make for obvious reading, and it's easy to not notice if you get an error code wrong. REST framework provides more explicit identifiers for each status code, such as HTTP_400_BAD_REQUEST
in the status
module. It's a good idea to use these throughout rather than using numeric identifiers.
REST framework provides two wrappers you can use to write API views.
+@api_view
decorator for working with function based views.APIView
class for working with class-based views.These wrappers provide a few bits of functionality such as making sure you receive Request
instances in your view, and adding context to Response
objects so that content negotiation can be performed.
The wrappers also provide behaviour such as returning 405 Method Not Allowed
responses when appropriate, and handling any ParseError
exception that occurs when accessing request.data
with malformed input.
Okay, let's go ahead and start using these new components to refactor our views slightly.
+from rest_framework import status
+from rest_framework.decorators import api_view
+from rest_framework.response import Response
+from snippets.models import Snippet
+from snippets.serializers import SnippetSerializer
+
+
+@api_view(['GET', 'POST'])
+def snippet_list(request):
+ """
+ List all code snippets, or create a new snippet.
+ """
+ if request.method == 'GET':
+ snippets = Snippet.objects.all()
+ serializer = SnippetSerializer(snippets, many=True)
+ return Response(serializer.data)
+
+ elif request.method == 'POST':
+ serializer = SnippetSerializer(data=request.data)
+ if serializer.is_valid():
+ serializer.save()
+ return Response(serializer.data, status=status.HTTP_201_CREATED)
+ return Response(serializer.errors, status=status.HTTP_400_BAD_REQUEST)
+
+Our instance view is an improvement over the previous example. It's a little more concise, and the code now feels very similar to if we were working with the Forms API. We're also using named status codes, which makes the response meanings more obvious.
+Here is the view for an individual snippet, in the views.py
module.
@api_view(['GET', 'PUT', 'DELETE'])
+def snippet_detail(request, pk):
+ """
+ Retrieve, update or delete a code snippet.
+ """
+ try:
+ snippet = Snippet.objects.get(pk=pk)
+ except Snippet.DoesNotExist:
+ return Response(status=status.HTTP_404_NOT_FOUND)
+
+ if request.method == 'GET':
+ serializer = SnippetSerializer(snippet)
+ return Response(serializer.data)
+
+ elif request.method == 'PUT':
+ serializer = SnippetSerializer(snippet, data=request.data)
+ if serializer.is_valid():
+ serializer.save()
+ return Response(serializer.data)
+ return Response(serializer.errors, status=status.HTTP_400_BAD_REQUEST)
+
+ elif request.method == 'DELETE':
+ snippet.delete()
+ return Response(status=status.HTTP_204_NO_CONTENT)
+
+This should all feel very familiar - it is not a lot different from working with regular Django views.
+Notice that we're no longer explicitly tying our requests or responses to a given content type. request.data
can handle incoming json
requests, but it can also handle other formats. Similarly we're returning response objects with data, but allowing REST framework to render the response into the correct content type for us.
To take advantage of the fact that our responses are no longer hardwired to a single content type let's add support for format suffixes to our API endpoints. Using format suffixes gives us URLs that explicitly refer to a given format, and means our API will be able to handle URLs such as http://example.com/api/items/4.json.
+Start by adding a format
keyword argument to both of the views, like so.
def snippet_list(request, format=None):
+
+and
+def snippet_detail(request, pk, format=None):
+
+Now update the snippets/urls.py
file slightly, to append a set of format_suffix_patterns
in addition to the existing URLs.
from django.urls import path
+from rest_framework.urlpatterns import format_suffix_patterns
+from snippets import views
+
+urlpatterns = [
+ path('snippets/', views.snippet_list),
+ path('snippets/<int:pk>', views.snippet_detail),
+]
+
+urlpatterns = format_suffix_patterns(urlpatterns)
+
+We don't necessarily need to add these extra url patterns in, but it gives us a simple, clean way of referring to a specific format.
+Go ahead and test the API from the command line, as we did in tutorial part 1. Everything is working pretty similarly, although we've got some nicer error handling if we send invalid requests.
+We can get a list of all of the snippets, as before.
+http http://127.0.0.1:8000/snippets/
+
+HTTP/1.1 200 OK
+...
+[
+ {
+ "id": 1,
+ "title": "",
+ "code": "foo = \"bar\"\n",
+ "linenos": false,
+ "language": "python",
+ "style": "friendly"
+ },
+ {
+ "id": 2,
+ "title": "",
+ "code": "print(\"hello, world\")\n",
+ "linenos": false,
+ "language": "python",
+ "style": "friendly"
+ }
+]
+
+We can control the format of the response that we get back, either by using the Accept
header:
http http://127.0.0.1:8000/snippets/ Accept:application/json # Request JSON
+http http://127.0.0.1:8000/snippets/ Accept:text/html # Request HTML
+
+Or by appending a format suffix:
+http http://127.0.0.1:8000/snippets.json # JSON suffix
+http http://127.0.0.1:8000/snippets.api # Browsable API suffix
+
+Similarly, we can control the format of the request that we send, using the Content-Type
header.
# POST using form data
+http --form POST http://127.0.0.1:8000/snippets/ code="print(123)"
+
+{
+ "id": 3,
+ "title": "",
+ "code": "print(123)",
+ "linenos": false,
+ "language": "python",
+ "style": "friendly"
+}
+
+# POST using JSON
+http --json POST http://127.0.0.1:8000/snippets/ code="print(456)"
+
+{
+ "id": 4,
+ "title": "",
+ "code": "print(456)",
+ "linenos": false,
+ "language": "python",
+ "style": "friendly"
+}
+
+If you add a --debug
switch to the http
requests above, you will be able to see the request type in request headers.
Now go and open the API in a web browser, by visiting http://127.0.0.1:8000/snippets/.
+Because the API chooses the content type of the response based on the client request, it will, by default, return an HTML-formatted representation of the resource when that resource is requested by a web browser. This allows for the API to return a fully web-browsable HTML representation.
+Having a web-browsable API is a huge usability win, and makes developing and using your API much easier. It also dramatically lowers the barrier-to-entry for other developers wanting to inspect and work with your API.
+See the browsable api topic for more information about the browsable API feature and how to customize it.
+In tutorial part 3, we'll start using class-based views, and see how generic views reduce the amount of code we need to write.
+ + +We can also write our API views using class-based views, rather than function based views. As we'll see this is a powerful pattern that allows us to reuse common functionality, and helps us keep our code DRY.
+We'll start by rewriting the root view as a class-based view. All this involves is a little bit of refactoring of views.py
.
from snippets.models import Snippet
+from snippets.serializers import SnippetSerializer
+from django.http import Http404
+from rest_framework.views import APIView
+from rest_framework.response import Response
+from rest_framework import status
+
+
+class SnippetList(APIView):
+ """
+ List all snippets, or create a new snippet.
+ """
+ def get(self, request, format=None):
+ snippets = Snippet.objects.all()
+ serializer = SnippetSerializer(snippets, many=True)
+ return Response(serializer.data)
+
+ def post(self, request, format=None):
+ serializer = SnippetSerializer(data=request.data)
+ if serializer.is_valid():
+ serializer.save()
+ return Response(serializer.data, status=status.HTTP_201_CREATED)
+ return Response(serializer.errors, status=status.HTTP_400_BAD_REQUEST)
+
+So far, so good. It looks pretty similar to the previous case, but we've got better separation between the different HTTP methods. We'll also need to update the instance view in views.py
.
class SnippetDetail(APIView):
+ """
+ Retrieve, update or delete a snippet instance.
+ """
+ def get_object(self, pk):
+ try:
+ return Snippet.objects.get(pk=pk)
+ except Snippet.DoesNotExist:
+ raise Http404
+
+ def get(self, request, pk, format=None):
+ snippet = self.get_object(pk)
+ serializer = SnippetSerializer(snippet)
+ return Response(serializer.data)
+
+ def put(self, request, pk, format=None):
+ snippet = self.get_object(pk)
+ serializer = SnippetSerializer(snippet, data=request.data)
+ if serializer.is_valid():
+ serializer.save()
+ return Response(serializer.data)
+ return Response(serializer.errors, status=status.HTTP_400_BAD_REQUEST)
+
+ def delete(self, request, pk, format=None):
+ snippet = self.get_object(pk)
+ snippet.delete()
+ return Response(status=status.HTTP_204_NO_CONTENT)
+
+That's looking good. Again, it's still pretty similar to the function based view right now.
+We'll also need to refactor our snippets/urls.py
slightly now that we're using class-based views.
from django.urls import path
+from rest_framework.urlpatterns import format_suffix_patterns
+from snippets import views
+
+urlpatterns = [
+ path('snippets/', views.SnippetList.as_view()),
+ path('snippets/<int:pk>/', views.SnippetDetail.as_view()),
+]
+
+urlpatterns = format_suffix_patterns(urlpatterns)
+
+Okay, we're done. If you run the development server everything should be working just as before.
+One of the big wins of using class-based views is that it allows us to easily compose reusable bits of behaviour.
+The create/retrieve/update/delete operations that we've been using so far are going to be pretty similar for any model-backed API views we create. Those bits of common behaviour are implemented in REST framework's mixin classes.
+Let's take a look at how we can compose the views by using the mixin classes. Here's our views.py
module again.
from snippets.models import Snippet
+from snippets.serializers import SnippetSerializer
+from rest_framework import mixins
+from rest_framework import generics
+
+class SnippetList(mixins.ListModelMixin,
+ mixins.CreateModelMixin,
+ generics.GenericAPIView):
+ queryset = Snippet.objects.all()
+ serializer_class = SnippetSerializer
+
+ def get(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
+ return self.list(request, *args, **kwargs)
+
+ def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
+ return self.create(request, *args, **kwargs)
+
+We'll take a moment to examine exactly what's happening here. We're building our view using GenericAPIView
, and adding in ListModelMixin
and CreateModelMixin
.
The base class provides the core functionality, and the mixin classes provide the .list()
and .create()
actions. We're then explicitly binding the get
and post
methods to the appropriate actions. Simple enough stuff so far.
class SnippetDetail(mixins.RetrieveModelMixin,
+ mixins.UpdateModelMixin,
+ mixins.DestroyModelMixin,
+ generics.GenericAPIView):
+ queryset = Snippet.objects.all()
+ serializer_class = SnippetSerializer
+
+ def get(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
+ return self.retrieve(request, *args, **kwargs)
+
+ def put(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
+ return self.update(request, *args, **kwargs)
+
+ def delete(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
+ return self.destroy(request, *args, **kwargs)
+
+Pretty similar. Again we're using the GenericAPIView
class to provide the core functionality, and adding in mixins to provide the .retrieve()
, .update()
and .destroy()
actions.
Using the mixin classes we've rewritten the views to use slightly less code than before, but we can go one step further. REST framework provides a set of already mixed-in generic views that we can use to trim down our views.py
module even more.
from snippets.models import Snippet
+from snippets.serializers import SnippetSerializer
+from rest_framework import generics
+
+
+class SnippetList(generics.ListCreateAPIView):
+ queryset = Snippet.objects.all()
+ serializer_class = SnippetSerializer
+
+
+class SnippetDetail(generics.RetrieveUpdateDestroyAPIView):
+ queryset = Snippet.objects.all()
+ serializer_class = SnippetSerializer
+
+Wow, that's pretty concise. We've gotten a huge amount for free, and our code looks like good, clean, idiomatic Django.
+Next we'll move onto part 4 of the tutorial, where we'll take a look at how we can deal with authentication and permissions for our API.
+ + +Currently our API doesn't have any restrictions on who can edit or delete code snippets. We'd like to have some more advanced behavior in order to make sure that:
+We're going to make a couple of changes to our Snippet
model class.
+First, let's add a couple of fields. One of those fields will be used to represent the user who created the code snippet. The other field will be used to store the highlighted HTML representation of the code.
Add the following two fields to the Snippet
model in models.py
.
owner = models.ForeignKey('auth.User', related_name='snippets', on_delete=models.CASCADE)
+highlighted = models.TextField()
+
+We'd also need to make sure that when the model is saved, that we populate the highlighted field, using the pygments
code highlighting library.
We'll need some extra imports:
+from pygments.lexers import get_lexer_by_name
+from pygments.formatters.html import HtmlFormatter
+from pygments import highlight
+
+And now we can add a .save()
method to our model class:
def save(self, *args, **kwargs):
+ """
+ Use the `pygments` library to create a highlighted HTML
+ representation of the code snippet.
+ """
+ lexer = get_lexer_by_name(self.language)
+ linenos = 'table' if self.linenos else False
+ options = {'title': self.title} if self.title else {}
+ formatter = HtmlFormatter(style=self.style, linenos=linenos,
+ full=True, **options)
+ self.highlighted = highlight(self.code, lexer, formatter)
+ super(Snippet, self).save(*args, **kwargs)
+
+When that's all done we'll need to update our database tables. +Normally we'd create a database migration in order to do that, but for the purposes of this tutorial, let's just delete the database and start again.
+rm -f db.sqlite3
+rm -r snippets/migrations
+python manage.py makemigrations snippets
+python manage.py migrate
+
+You might also want to create a few different users, to use for testing the API. The quickest way to do this will be with the createsuperuser
command.
python manage.py createsuperuser
+
+Now that we've got some users to work with, we'd better add representations of those users to our API. Creating a new serializer is easy. In serializers.py
add:
from django.contrib.auth.models import User
+
+class UserSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+ snippets = serializers.PrimaryKeyRelatedField(many=True, queryset=Snippet.objects.all())
+
+ class Meta:
+ model = User
+ fields = ['id', 'username', 'snippets']
+
+Because 'snippets'
is a reverse relationship on the User model, it will not be included by default when using the ModelSerializer
class, so we needed to add an explicit field for it.
We'll also add a couple of views to views.py
. We'd like to just use read-only views for the user representations, so we'll use the ListAPIView
and RetrieveAPIView
generic class-based views.
from django.contrib.auth.models import User
+
+
+class UserList(generics.ListAPIView):
+ queryset = User.objects.all()
+ serializer_class = UserSerializer
+
+
+class UserDetail(generics.RetrieveAPIView):
+ queryset = User.objects.all()
+ serializer_class = UserSerializer
+
+Make sure to also import the UserSerializer
class
from snippets.serializers import UserSerializer
+
+Finally we need to add those views into the API, by referencing them from the URL conf. Add the following to the patterns in snippets/urls.py
.
path('users/', views.UserList.as_view()),
+path('users/<int:pk>/', views.UserDetail.as_view()),
+
+Right now, if we created a code snippet, there'd be no way of associating the user that created the snippet, with the snippet instance. The user isn't sent as part of the serialized representation, but is instead a property of the incoming request.
+The way we deal with that is by overriding a .perform_create()
method on our snippet views, that allows us to modify how the instance save is managed, and handle any information that is implicit in the incoming request or requested URL.
On the SnippetList
view class, add the following method:
def perform_create(self, serializer):
+ serializer.save(owner=self.request.user)
+
+The create()
method of our serializer will now be passed an additional 'owner'
field, along with the validated data from the request.
Now that snippets are associated with the user that created them, let's update our SnippetSerializer
to reflect that. Add the following field to the serializer definition in serializers.py
:
owner = serializers.ReadOnlyField(source='owner.username')
+
+Note: Make sure you also add 'owner',
to the list of fields in the inner Meta
class.
This field is doing something quite interesting. The source
argument controls which attribute is used to populate a field, and can point at any attribute on the serialized instance. It can also take the dotted notation shown above, in which case it will traverse the given attributes, in a similar way as it is used with Django's template language.
The field we've added is the untyped ReadOnlyField
class, in contrast to the other typed fields, such as CharField
, BooleanField
etc... The untyped ReadOnlyField
is always read-only, and will be used for serialized representations, but will not be used for updating model instances when they are deserialized. We could have also used CharField(read_only=True)
here.
Now that code snippets are associated with users, we want to make sure that only authenticated users are able to create, update and delete code snippets.
+REST framework includes a number of permission classes that we can use to restrict who can access a given view. In this case the one we're looking for is IsAuthenticatedOrReadOnly
, which will ensure that authenticated requests get read-write access, and unauthenticated requests get read-only access.
First add the following import in the views module
+from rest_framework import permissions
+
+Then, add the following property to both the SnippetList
and SnippetDetail
view classes.
permission_classes = [permissions.IsAuthenticatedOrReadOnly]
+
+If you open a browser and navigate to the browsable API at the moment, you'll find that you're no longer able to create new code snippets. In order to do so we'd need to be able to login as a user.
+We can add a login view for use with the browsable API, by editing the URLconf in our project-level urls.py
file.
Add the following import at the top of the file:
+from django.conf.urls import include
+
+And, at the end of the file, add a pattern to include the login and logout views for the browsable API.
+urlpatterns += [
+ path('api-auth/', include('rest_framework.urls')),
+]
+
+The 'api-auth/'
part of pattern can actually be whatever URL you want to use.
Now if you open up the browser again and refresh the page you'll see a 'Login' link in the top right of the page. If you log in as one of the users you created earlier, you'll be able to create code snippets again.
+Once you've created a few code snippets, navigate to the '/users/' endpoint, and notice that the representation includes a list of the snippet ids that are associated with each user, in each user's 'snippets' field.
+Really we'd like all code snippets to be visible to anyone, but also make sure that only the user that created a code snippet is able to update or delete it.
+To do that we're going to need to create a custom permission.
+In the snippets app, create a new file, permissions.py
from rest_framework import permissions
+
+
+class IsOwnerOrReadOnly(permissions.BasePermission):
+ """
+ Custom permission to only allow owners of an object to edit it.
+ """
+
+ def has_object_permission(self, request, view, obj):
+ # Read permissions are allowed to any request,
+ # so we'll always allow GET, HEAD or OPTIONS requests.
+ if request.method in permissions.SAFE_METHODS:
+ return True
+
+ # Write permissions are only allowed to the owner of the snippet.
+ return obj.owner == request.user
+
+Now we can add that custom permission to our snippet instance endpoint, by editing the permission_classes
property on the SnippetDetail
view class:
permission_classes = [permissions.IsAuthenticatedOrReadOnly,
+ IsOwnerOrReadOnly]
+
+Make sure to also import the IsOwnerOrReadOnly
class.
from snippets.permissions import IsOwnerOrReadOnly
+
+Now, if you open a browser again, you find that the 'DELETE' and 'PUT' actions only appear on a snippet instance endpoint if you're logged in as the same user that created the code snippet.
+Because we now have a set of permissions on the API, we need to authenticate our requests to it if we want to edit any snippets. We haven't set up any authentication classes, so the defaults are currently applied, which are SessionAuthentication
and BasicAuthentication
.
When we interact with the API through the web browser, we can login, and the browser session will then provide the required authentication for the requests.
+If we're interacting with the API programmatically we need to explicitly provide the authentication credentials on each request.
+If we try to create a snippet without authenticating, we'll get an error:
+http POST http://127.0.0.1:8000/snippets/ code="print(123)"
+
+{
+ "detail": "Authentication credentials were not provided."
+}
+
+We can make a successful request by including the username and password of one of the users we created earlier.
+http -a admin:password123 POST http://127.0.0.1:8000/snippets/ code="print(789)"
+
+{
+ "id": 1,
+ "owner": "admin",
+ "title": "foo",
+ "code": "print(789)",
+ "linenos": false,
+ "language": "python",
+ "style": "friendly"
+}
+
+We've now got a fairly fine-grained set of permissions on our Web API, and end points for users of the system and for the code snippets that they have created.
+In part 5 of the tutorial we'll look at how we can tie everything together by creating an HTML endpoint for our highlighted snippets, and improve the cohesion of our API by using hyperlinking for the relationships within the system.
+ + +At the moment relationships within our API are represented by using primary keys. In this part of the tutorial we'll improve the cohesion and discoverability of our API, by instead using hyperlinking for relationships.
+Right now we have endpoints for 'snippets' and 'users', but we don't have a single entry point to our API. To create one, we'll use a regular function-based view and the @api_view
decorator we introduced earlier. In your snippets/views.py
add:
from rest_framework.decorators import api_view
+from rest_framework.response import Response
+from rest_framework.reverse import reverse
+
+
+@api_view(['GET'])
+def api_root(request, format=None):
+ return Response({
+ 'users': reverse('user-list', request=request, format=format),
+ 'snippets': reverse('snippet-list', request=request, format=format)
+ })
+
+Two things should be noticed here. First, we're using REST framework's reverse
function in order to return fully-qualified URLs; second, URL patterns are identified by convenience names that we will declare later on in our snippets/urls.py
.
The other obvious thing that's still missing from our pastebin API is the code highlighting endpoints.
+Unlike all our other API endpoints, we don't want to use JSON, but instead just present an HTML representation. There are two styles of HTML renderer provided by REST framework, one for dealing with HTML rendered using templates, the other for dealing with pre-rendered HTML. The second renderer is the one we'd like to use for this endpoint.
+The other thing we need to consider when creating the code highlight view is that there's no existing concrete generic view that we can use. We're not returning an object instance, but instead a property of an object instance.
+Instead of using a concrete generic view, we'll use the base class for representing instances, and create our own .get()
method. In your snippets/views.py
add:
from rest_framework import renderers
+from rest_framework.response import Response
+
+class SnippetHighlight(generics.GenericAPIView):
+ queryset = Snippet.objects.all()
+ renderer_classes = [renderers.StaticHTMLRenderer]
+
+ def get(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
+ snippet = self.get_object()
+ return Response(snippet.highlighted)
+
+As usual we need to add the new views that we've created in to our URLconf.
+We'll add a url pattern for our new API root in snippets/urls.py
:
path('', views.api_root),
+
+And then add a url pattern for the snippet highlights:
+path('snippets/<int:pk>/highlight/', views.SnippetHighlight.as_view()),
+
+Dealing with relationships between entities is one of the more challenging aspects of Web API design. There are a number of different ways that we might choose to represent a relationship:
+REST framework supports all of these styles, and can apply them across forward or reverse relationships, or apply them across custom managers such as generic foreign keys.
+In this case we'd like to use a hyperlinked style between entities. In order to do so, we'll modify our serializers to extend HyperlinkedModelSerializer
instead of the existing ModelSerializer
.
The HyperlinkedModelSerializer
has the following differences from ModelSerializer
:
id
field by default.url
field, using HyperlinkedIdentityField
.HyperlinkedRelatedField
,
+ instead of PrimaryKeyRelatedField
.We can easily re-write our existing serializers to use hyperlinking. In your snippets/serializers.py
add:
class SnippetSerializer(serializers.HyperlinkedModelSerializer):
+ owner = serializers.ReadOnlyField(source='owner.username')
+ highlight = serializers.HyperlinkedIdentityField(view_name='snippet-highlight', format='html')
+
+ class Meta:
+ model = Snippet
+ fields = ['url', 'id', 'highlight', 'owner',
+ 'title', 'code', 'linenos', 'language', 'style']
+
+
+class UserSerializer(serializers.HyperlinkedModelSerializer):
+ snippets = serializers.HyperlinkedRelatedField(many=True, view_name='snippet-detail', read_only=True)
+
+ class Meta:
+ model = User
+ fields = ['url', 'id', 'username', 'snippets']
+
+Notice that we've also added a new 'highlight'
field. This field is of the same type as the url
field, except that it points to the 'snippet-highlight'
url pattern, instead of the 'snippet-detail'
url pattern.
Because we've included format suffixed URLs such as '.json'
, we also need to indicate on the highlight
field that any format suffixed hyperlinks it returns should use the '.html'
suffix.
If we're going to have a hyperlinked API, we need to make sure we name our URL patterns. Let's take a look at which URL patterns we need to name.
+'user-list'
and 'snippet-list'
.'snippet-highlight'
.'snippet-detail'
.'url'
fields that by default will refer to '{model_name}-detail'
, which in this case will be 'snippet-detail'
and 'user-detail'
.After adding all those names into our URLconf, our final snippets/urls.py
file should look like this:
from django.urls import path
+from rest_framework.urlpatterns import format_suffix_patterns
+from snippets import views
+
+# API endpoints
+urlpatterns = format_suffix_patterns([
+ path('', views.api_root),
+ path('snippets/',
+ views.SnippetList.as_view(),
+ name='snippet-list'),
+ path('snippets/<int:pk>/',
+ views.SnippetDetail.as_view(),
+ name='snippet-detail'),
+ path('snippets/<int:pk>/highlight/',
+ views.SnippetHighlight.as_view(),
+ name='snippet-highlight'),
+ path('users/',
+ views.UserList.as_view(),
+ name='user-list'),
+ path('users/<int:pk>/',
+ views.UserDetail.as_view(),
+ name='user-detail')
+])
+
+The list views for users and code snippets could end up returning quite a lot of instances, so really we'd like to make sure we paginate the results, and allow the API client to step through each of the individual pages.
+We can change the default list style to use pagination, by modifying our tutorial/settings.py
file slightly. Add the following setting:
REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ 'DEFAULT_PAGINATION_CLASS': 'rest_framework.pagination.PageNumberPagination',
+ 'PAGE_SIZE': 10
+}
+
+Note that settings in REST framework are all namespaced into a single dictionary setting, named REST_FRAMEWORK
, which helps keep them well separated from your other project settings.
We could also customize the pagination style if we needed too, but in this case we'll just stick with the default.
+If we open a browser and navigate to the browsable API, you'll find that you can now work your way around the API simply by following links.
+You'll also be able to see the 'highlight' links on the snippet instances, that will take you to the highlighted code HTML representations.
+In part 6 of the tutorial we'll look at how we can use ViewSets and Routers to reduce the amount of code we need to build our API.
+ + +REST framework includes an abstraction for dealing with ViewSets
, that allows the developer to concentrate on modeling the state and interactions of the API, and leave the URL construction to be handled automatically, based on common conventions.
ViewSet
classes are almost the same thing as View
classes, except that they provide operations such as read
, or update
, and not method handlers such as get
or put
.
A ViewSet
class is only bound to a set of method handlers at the last moment, when it is instantiated into a set of views, typically by using a Router
class which handles the complexities of defining the URL conf for you.
Let's take our current set of views, and refactor them into view sets.
+First of all let's refactor our UserList
and UserDetail
views into a single UserViewSet
. We can remove the two views, and replace them with a single class:
from rest_framework import viewsets
+
+class UserViewSet(viewsets.ReadOnlyModelViewSet):
+ """
+ This viewset automatically provides `list` and `detail` actions.
+ """
+ queryset = User.objects.all()
+ serializer_class = UserSerializer
+
+Here we've used the ReadOnlyModelViewSet
class to automatically provide the default 'read-only' operations. We're still setting the queryset
and serializer_class
attributes exactly as we did when we were using regular views, but we no longer need to provide the same information to two separate classes.
Next we're going to replace the SnippetList
, SnippetDetail
and SnippetHighlight
view classes. We can remove the three views, and again replace them with a single class.
from rest_framework.decorators import action
+from rest_framework.response import Response
+
+class SnippetViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
+ """
+ This viewset automatically provides `list`, `create`, `retrieve`,
+ `update` and `destroy` actions.
+
+ Additionally we also provide an extra `highlight` action.
+ """
+ queryset = Snippet.objects.all()
+ serializer_class = SnippetSerializer
+ permission_classes = [permissions.IsAuthenticatedOrReadOnly,
+ IsOwnerOrReadOnly]
+
+ @action(detail=True, renderer_classes=[renderers.StaticHTMLRenderer])
+ def highlight(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
+ snippet = self.get_object()
+ return Response(snippet.highlighted)
+
+ def perform_create(self, serializer):
+ serializer.save(owner=self.request.user)
+
+This time we've used the ModelViewSet
class in order to get the complete set of default read and write operations.
Notice that we've also used the @action
decorator to create a custom action, named highlight
. This decorator can be used to add any custom endpoints that don't fit into the standard create
/update
/delete
style.
Custom actions which use the @action
decorator will respond to GET
requests by default. We can use the methods
argument if we wanted an action that responded to POST
requests.
The URLs for custom actions by default depend on the method name itself. If you want to change the way url should be constructed, you can include url_path
as a decorator keyword argument.
The handler methods only get bound to the actions when we define the URLConf. +To see what's going on under the hood let's first explicitly create a set of views from our ViewSets.
+In the snippets/urls.py
file we bind our ViewSet
classes into a set of concrete views.
from snippets.views import SnippetViewSet, UserViewSet, api_root
+from rest_framework import renderers
+
+snippet_list = SnippetViewSet.as_view({
+ 'get': 'list',
+ 'post': 'create'
+})
+snippet_detail = SnippetViewSet.as_view({
+ 'get': 'retrieve',
+ 'put': 'update',
+ 'patch': 'partial_update',
+ 'delete': 'destroy'
+})
+snippet_highlight = SnippetViewSet.as_view({
+ 'get': 'highlight'
+}, renderer_classes=[renderers.StaticHTMLRenderer])
+user_list = UserViewSet.as_view({
+ 'get': 'list'
+})
+user_detail = UserViewSet.as_view({
+ 'get': 'retrieve'
+})
+
+Notice how we're creating multiple views from each ViewSet
class, by binding the http methods to the required action for each view.
Now that we've bound our resources into concrete views, we can register the views with the URL conf as usual.
+urlpatterns = format_suffix_patterns([
+ path('', api_root),
+ path('snippets/', snippet_list, name='snippet-list'),
+ path('snippets/<int:pk>/', snippet_detail, name='snippet-detail'),
+ path('snippets/<int:pk>/highlight/', snippet_highlight, name='snippet-highlight'),
+ path('users/', user_list, name='user-list'),
+ path('users/<int:pk>/', user_detail, name='user-detail')
+])
+
+Because we're using ViewSet
classes rather than View
classes, we actually don't need to design the URL conf ourselves. The conventions for wiring up resources into views and urls can be handled automatically, using a Router
class. All we need to do is register the appropriate view sets with a router, and let it do the rest.
Here's our re-wired snippets/urls.py
file.
from django.urls import path, include
+from rest_framework.routers import DefaultRouter
+from snippets import views
+
+# Create a router and register our viewsets with it.
+router = DefaultRouter()
+router.register(r'snippets', views.SnippetViewSet)
+router.register(r'users', views.UserViewSet)
+
+# The API URLs are now determined automatically by the router.
+urlpatterns = [
+ path('', include(router.urls)),
+]
+
+Registering the viewsets with the router is similar to providing a urlpattern. We include two arguments - the URL prefix for the views, and the viewset itself.
+The DefaultRouter
class we're using also automatically creates the API root view for us, so we can now delete the api_root
method from our views
module.
Using viewsets can be a really useful abstraction. It helps ensure that URL conventions will be consistent across your API, minimizes the amount of code you need to write, and allows you to concentrate on the interactions and representations your API provides rather than the specifics of the URL conf.
+That doesn't mean it's always the right approach to take. There's a similar set of trade-offs to consider as when using class-based views instead of function based views. Using viewsets is less explicit than building your views individually.
+ + +We're going to create a simple API to allow admin users to view and edit the users and groups in the system.
+Create a new Django project named tutorial
, then start a new app called quickstart
.
# Create the project directory
+mkdir tutorial
+cd tutorial
+
+# Create a virtual environment to isolate our package dependencies locally
+python3 -m venv env
+source env/bin/activate # On Windows use `env\Scripts\activate`
+
+# Install Django and Django REST framework into the virtual environment
+pip install django
+pip install djangorestframework
+
+# Set up a new project with a single application
+django-admin startproject tutorial . # Note the trailing '.' character
+cd tutorial
+django-admin startapp quickstart
+cd ..
+
+The project layout should look like:
+$ pwd
+<some path>/tutorial
+$ find .
+.
+./manage.py
+./tutorial
+./tutorial/__init__.py
+./tutorial/quickstart
+./tutorial/quickstart/__init__.py
+./tutorial/quickstart/admin.py
+./tutorial/quickstart/apps.py
+./tutorial/quickstart/migrations
+./tutorial/quickstart/migrations/__init__.py
+./tutorial/quickstart/models.py
+./tutorial/quickstart/tests.py
+./tutorial/quickstart/views.py
+./tutorial/settings.py
+./tutorial/urls.py
+./tutorial/wsgi.py
+
+It may look unusual that the application has been created within the project directory. Using the project's namespace avoids name clashes with external modules (a topic that goes outside the scope of the quickstart).
+Now sync your database for the first time:
+python manage.py migrate
+
+We'll also create an initial user named admin
with a password of password123
. We'll authenticate as that user later in our example.
python manage.py createsuperuser --email admin@example.com --username admin
+
+Once you've set up a database and the initial user is created and ready to go, open up the app's directory and we'll get coding...
+First up we're going to define some serializers. Let's create a new module named tutorial/quickstart/serializers.py
that we'll use for our data representations.
from django.contrib.auth.models import User, Group
+from rest_framework import serializers
+
+
+class UserSerializer(serializers.HyperlinkedModelSerializer):
+ class Meta:
+ model = User
+ fields = ['url', 'username', 'email', 'groups']
+
+
+class GroupSerializer(serializers.HyperlinkedModelSerializer):
+ class Meta:
+ model = Group
+ fields = ['url', 'name']
+
+Notice that we're using hyperlinked relations in this case with HyperlinkedModelSerializer
. You can also use primary key and various other relationships, but hyperlinking is good RESTful design.
Right, we'd better write some views then. Open tutorial/quickstart/views.py
and get typing.
from django.contrib.auth.models import User, Group
+from rest_framework import viewsets
+from tutorial.quickstart.serializers import UserSerializer, GroupSerializer
+
+
+class UserViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
+ """
+ API endpoint that allows users to be viewed or edited.
+ """
+ queryset = User.objects.all().order_by('-date_joined')
+ serializer_class = UserSerializer
+
+
+class GroupViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
+ """
+ API endpoint that allows groups to be viewed or edited.
+ """
+ queryset = Group.objects.all()
+ serializer_class = GroupSerializer
+
+Rather than write multiple views we're grouping together all the common behavior into classes called ViewSets
.
We can easily break these down into individual views if we need to, but using viewsets keeps the view logic nicely organized as well as being very concise.
+Okay, now let's wire up the API URLs. On to tutorial/urls.py
...
from django.urls import include, path
+from rest_framework import routers
+from tutorial.quickstart import views
+
+router = routers.DefaultRouter()
+router.register(r'users', views.UserViewSet)
+router.register(r'groups', views.GroupViewSet)
+
+# Wire up our API using automatic URL routing.
+# Additionally, we include login URLs for the browsable API.
+urlpatterns = [
+ path('', include(router.urls)),
+ path('api-auth/', include('rest_framework.urls', namespace='rest_framework'))
+]
+
+Because we're using viewsets instead of views, we can automatically generate the URL conf for our API, by simply registering the viewsets with a router class.
+Again, if we need more control over the API URLs we can simply drop down to using regular class-based views, and writing the URL conf explicitly.
+Finally, we're including default login and logout views for use with the browsable API. That's optional, but useful if your API requires authentication and you want to use the browsable API.
+Pagination allows you to control how many objects per page are returned. To enable it add the following lines to tutorial/settings.py
REST_FRAMEWORK = {
+ 'DEFAULT_PAGINATION_CLASS': 'rest_framework.pagination.PageNumberPagination',
+ 'PAGE_SIZE': 10
+}
+
+Add 'rest_framework'
to INSTALLED_APPS
. The settings module will be in tutorial/settings.py
INSTALLED_APPS = [
+ ...
+ 'rest_framework',
+]
+
+Okay, we're done.
+We're now ready to test the API we've built. Let's fire up the server from the command line.
+python manage.py runserver
+
+We can now access our API, both from the command-line, using tools like curl
...
bash: curl -H 'Accept: application/json; indent=4' -u admin:password123 http://127.0.0.1:8000/users/
+{
+ "count": 2,
+ "next": null,
+ "previous": null,
+ "results": [
+ {
+ "email": "admin@example.com",
+ "groups": [],
+ "url": "http://127.0.0.1:8000/users/1/",
+ "username": "admin"
+ },
+ {
+ "email": "tom@example.com",
+ "groups": [ ],
+ "url": "http://127.0.0.1:8000/users/2/",
+ "username": "tom"
+ }
+ ]
+}
+
+Or using the httpie, command line tool...
+bash: http -a admin:password123 http://127.0.0.1:8000/users/
+
+HTTP/1.1 200 OK
+...
+{
+ "count": 2,
+ "next": null,
+ "previous": null,
+ "results": [
+ {
+ "email": "admin@example.com",
+ "groups": [],
+ "url": "http://localhost:8000/users/1/",
+ "username": "paul"
+ },
+ {
+ "email": "tom@example.com",
+ "groups": [ ],
+ "url": "http://127.0.0.1:8000/users/2/",
+ "username": "tom"
+ }
+ ]
+}
+
+Or directly through the browser, by going to the URL http://127.0.0.1:8000/users/
...
If you're working through the browser, make sure to login using the control in the top right corner.
+Great, that was easy!
+If you want to get a more in depth understanding of how REST framework fits together head on over to the tutorial, or start browsing the API guide.
+ + +