mirror of
https://github.com/ets-labs/python-dependency-injector.git
synced 2024-11-22 17:47:02 +03:00
Merge branch 'release/3.42.0' into master
This commit is contained in:
commit
ac8212a95b
49
README.rst
49
README.rst
|
@ -66,11 +66,11 @@ Coupling and cohesion are about how tough the components are tied.
|
|||
- **High coupling**. If the coupling is high it's like using a superglue or welding. No easy way
|
||||
to disassemble.
|
||||
- **High cohesion**. High cohesion is like using the screws. Very easy to disassemble and
|
||||
assemble back or assemble a different way. It is an alternative to high coupling.
|
||||
assemble back or assemble a different way. It is an opposite to high coupling.
|
||||
|
||||
When the cohesion is high the coupling is low.
|
||||
|
||||
High cohesion brings the flexibility. Your code becomes easier to change and test.
|
||||
Low coupling brings a flexibility. Your code becomes easier to change and test.
|
||||
|
||||
How to implement dependency injection?
|
||||
--------------------------------------
|
||||
|
@ -124,7 +124,6 @@ After:
|
|||
if __name__ == '__main__':
|
||||
service = Service(ApiClient(os.getenv('API_KEY'), os.getenv('TIMEOUT')))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
``ApiClient`` is decoupled from knowing where the options come from. You can read a key and a
|
||||
timeout from a configuration file or even get them from a database.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -133,16 +132,23 @@ stub or other compatible object.
|
|||
|
||||
Flexibility comes with a price.
|
||||
|
||||
Now you need to assemble your objects like this
|
||||
``Service(ApiClient(os.getenv('API_KEY'), os.getenv('TIMEOUT')))``. The assembly code might get
|
||||
duplicated and it'll become harder to change the application structure.
|
||||
Now you need to assemble the objects like this::
|
||||
|
||||
What does Dependency Injector do?
|
||||
---------------------------------
|
||||
service = Service(ApiClient(os.getenv('API_KEY'), os.getenv('TIMEOUT')))
|
||||
|
||||
The assembly code might get duplicated and it'll become harder to change the application structure.
|
||||
|
||||
Here comes the ``Dependency Injector``.
|
||||
|
||||
What does the Dependency Injector do?
|
||||
-------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
With the dependency injection pattern objects lose the responsibility of assembling the
|
||||
dependencies. The ``Dependency Injector`` absorbs that responsibility.
|
||||
|
||||
``Dependency Injector`` helps to assemble the objects.
|
||||
|
||||
It provides you the container and the providers that help you describe objects assembly. When you
|
||||
It provides a container and providers that help you with the objects assembly. When you
|
||||
need an object you get it from the container. The rest of the assembly work is done by the
|
||||
framework:
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -151,19 +157,6 @@ framework:
|
|||
from dependency_injector import containers, providers
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class ApiClient:
|
||||
|
||||
def __init__(self, api_key: str, timeout: int):
|
||||
self.api_key = api_key
|
||||
self.timeout = timeout
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class Service:
|
||||
|
||||
def __init__(self, api_client: ApiClient):
|
||||
self.api_client = api_client
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class Container(containers.DeclarativeContainer):
|
||||
|
||||
config = providers.Configuration()
|
||||
|
@ -187,12 +180,14 @@ framework:
|
|||
|
||||
service = container.service()
|
||||
|
||||
Retrieving of the ``Service`` instance now is done like this ``container.service()``.
|
||||
Retrieving of the ``Service`` instance now is done like this::
|
||||
|
||||
service = container.service()
|
||||
|
||||
Objects assembling is consolidated in the container. When you need to make a change you do it in
|
||||
one place.
|
||||
|
||||
When doing the testing you call the ``container.api_client.override()`` to replace the real API
|
||||
When doing a testing you call the ``container.api_client.override()`` to replace the real API
|
||||
client with a mock:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: python
|
||||
|
@ -203,10 +198,10 @@ client with a mock:
|
|||
with container.api_client.override(mock.Mock()):
|
||||
service = container.service()
|
||||
|
||||
It helps in a testing. Also you can use it for configuring project for the different environments:
|
||||
replace an API client with a stub on the dev or stage.
|
||||
You can override any provider by another provider.
|
||||
|
||||
`More examples <https://github.com/ets-labs/python-dependency-injector/tree/master/examples>`_
|
||||
It also helps you in configuring project for the different environments: replace an API client
|
||||
with a stub on the dev or stage.
|
||||
|
||||
Installation
|
||||
------------
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,137 +1,256 @@
|
|||
Dependency injection and inversion of control in Python
|
||||
-------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
=======================================================
|
||||
|
||||
.. meta::
|
||||
:keywords: Python,DI,Dependency injection,IoC,Inversion of Control
|
||||
:description: This article describes benefits of dependency injection and
|
||||
inversion of control for Python applications. Also it
|
||||
contains some Python examples that show how dependency
|
||||
injection and inversion could be implemented. In addition, it
|
||||
demonstrates usage of dependency injection framework,
|
||||
IoC container and such popular design pattern as Factory.
|
||||
:keywords: Python,DI,Dependency injection,IoC,Inversion of Control,Example
|
||||
:description: This page describes a usage of the dependency injection and inversion of control
|
||||
in Python. It contains Python examples that show how to implement dependency
|
||||
injection. It demonstrates a usage of the dependency injection framework
|
||||
Dependency Injector, its container, Factory, Singleton and Configuration
|
||||
providers. The example show how to use Dependency Injector providers overriding
|
||||
feature for testing or configuring project in different environments and explains
|
||||
why it's better then monkey-patching.
|
||||
|
||||
History
|
||||
~~~~~~~
|
||||
Originally dependency injection pattern got popular in the languages with a static typing,
|
||||
like Java. Dependency injection is a principle that helps to achieve an inversion of control.
|
||||
Dependency injection framework can significantly improve a flexibility of the language
|
||||
with a static typing. Implementation of a dependency injection framework for a language
|
||||
with a static typing is not something that one can do quickly. It will be a quite complex thing
|
||||
to be done well. And will take time.
|
||||
|
||||
Originally, dependency injection pattern got popular in languages with static
|
||||
typing, like Java. Dependency injection framework can
|
||||
significantly improve flexibility of the language with static typing. Also,
|
||||
implementation of dependency injection framework for language with static
|
||||
typing is not something that one can do shortly, it could be quite complex
|
||||
thing to be done well.
|
||||
Python is an interpreted language with a dynamic typing. There is an opinion that dependency
|
||||
injection doesn't work for it as well as it does for Java. A lot of the flexibility is already
|
||||
built in. Also there is an opinion that a dependency injection framework is something that
|
||||
Python developer rarely needs. Python developers say that dependency injection can be implemented
|
||||
easily using language fundamentals.
|
||||
|
||||
While Python is very flexible interpreted language with dynamic typing, there
|
||||
is a meaning that dependency injection doesn't work for it as well, as it does
|
||||
for Java. Also there is a meaning that dependency injection framework is
|
||||
something that Python developer would not ever need, cause dependency injection
|
||||
could be implemented easily using language fundamentals.
|
||||
This page describes the advantages of the dependency injection usage in Python. It
|
||||
contains Python examples that show how to implement dependency injection. It demonstrates a usage
|
||||
of the dependency injection framework ``Dependency Injector``, its container, ``Factory``,
|
||||
``Singleton`` and ``Configuration`` providers. The example shows how to use ``Dependency Injector``
|
||||
providers overriding feature for testing or configuring project in different environments and
|
||||
explains why it's better then monkey-patching.
|
||||
|
||||
Discussion
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
What is dependency injection?
|
||||
-----------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
It is true.
|
||||
Let's see what the dependency injection is.
|
||||
|
||||
Partly.
|
||||
Dependency injection is a principle that helps to decrease coupling and increase cohesion.
|
||||
|
||||
Dependency injection, as a software design pattern, has number of
|
||||
advantages that are common for each language (including Python):
|
||||
.. image:: images/coupling-cohesion.png
|
||||
|
||||
+ Dependency Injection decreases coupling between a class and its dependency.
|
||||
+ Because dependency injection doesn't require any change in code behavior it
|
||||
can be applied to legacy code as a refactoring. The result is clients that
|
||||
are more independent and that are easier to unit test in isolation using
|
||||
stubs or mock objects that simulate other objects not under test. This ease
|
||||
of testing is often the first benefit noticed when using dependency
|
||||
injection.
|
||||
+ Dependency injection can be used to externalize a system's configuration
|
||||
details into configuration files allowing the system to be reconfigured
|
||||
without recompilation (rebuilding). Separate configurations can be written
|
||||
for different situations that require different implementations of
|
||||
components. This includes, but is not limited to, testing.
|
||||
+ Reduction of boilerplate code in the application objects since all work to
|
||||
initialize or set up dependencies is handled by a provider component.
|
||||
+ Dependency injection allows a client to remove all knowledge of a concrete
|
||||
implementation that it needs to use. This helps isolate the client from the
|
||||
impact of design changes and defects. It promotes reusability, testability
|
||||
and maintainability.
|
||||
+ Dependency injection allows a client the flexibility of being configurable.
|
||||
Only the client's behavior is fixed. The client may act on anything that
|
||||
supports the intrinsic interface the client expects.
|
||||
What is coupling and cohesion?
|
||||
|
||||
.. note::
|
||||
Coupling and cohesion are about how tough the components are tied.
|
||||
|
||||
While improved testability is one the first benefits of using dependency
|
||||
injection, it could be easily overwhelmed by monkey-patching technique,
|
||||
that works absolutely great in Python (you can monkey-patch anything,
|
||||
anytime). At the same time, monkey-patching has nothing similar with
|
||||
other advantages defined above. Also monkey-patching technique is
|
||||
something that could be considered like too dirty to be used in production.
|
||||
- **High coupling**. If the coupling is high it's like using a superglue or welding. No easy way
|
||||
to disassemble.
|
||||
- **High cohesion**. High cohesion is like using the screws. Very easy to disassemble and
|
||||
assemble back or assemble a different way. It is an opposite to high coupling.
|
||||
|
||||
The complexity of dependency injection pattern implementation in Python is
|
||||
definitely quite lower than in other languages (even with dynamic typing).
|
||||
When the cohesion is high the coupling is low.
|
||||
|
||||
.. note::
|
||||
Low coupling brings a flexibility. Your code becomes easier to change and test.
|
||||
|
||||
Low complexity of dependency injection pattern implementation in Python
|
||||
still means that some code should be written, reviewed, tested and
|
||||
supported.
|
||||
How to implement the dependency injection?
|
||||
|
||||
Talking about inversion of control, it is a software design principle that
|
||||
also works for each programming language, not depending on its typing type.
|
||||
Objects do not create each other anymore. They provide a way to inject the dependencies instead.
|
||||
|
||||
Inversion of control is used to increase modularity of the program and make
|
||||
it extensible.
|
||||
Before:
|
||||
|
||||
Main design purposes of using inversion of control are:
|
||||
.. code-block:: python
|
||||
|
||||
+ To decouple the execution of a task from implementation.
|
||||
+ To focus a module on the task it is designed for.
|
||||
+ To free modules from assumptions about how other systems do what they do and
|
||||
instead rely on contracts.
|
||||
+ To prevent side effects when replacing a module.
|
||||
import os
|
||||
|
||||
Example
|
||||
~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
Let's go through next example:
|
||||
class ApiClient:
|
||||
|
||||
.. image:: /images/miniapps/engines_cars/diagram.png
|
||||
:width: 100%
|
||||
:align: center
|
||||
def __init__(self):
|
||||
self.api_key = os.getenv('API_KEY') # <-- the dependency
|
||||
self.timeout = os.getenv('TIMEOUT') # <-- the dependency
|
||||
|
||||
Listing of ``example.engines`` module:
|
||||
|
||||
.. literalinclude:: ../../examples/miniapps/engines_cars/example/engines.py
|
||||
:language: python
|
||||
class Service:
|
||||
|
||||
Listing of ``example.cars`` module:
|
||||
def __init__(self):
|
||||
self.api_client = ApiClient() # <-- the dependency
|
||||
|
||||
.. literalinclude:: ../../examples/miniapps/engines_cars/example/cars.py
|
||||
:language: python
|
||||
|
||||
Next example demonstrates creation of several cars with different engines:
|
||||
if __name__ == '__main__':
|
||||
service = Service()
|
||||
|
||||
.. literalinclude:: ../../examples/miniapps/engines_cars/example_di.py
|
||||
:language: python
|
||||
|
||||
While previous example demonstrates advantages of dependency injection, there
|
||||
is a disadvantage demonstration as well - creation of car requires additional
|
||||
code for specification of dependencies. Nevertheless, this disadvantage could
|
||||
be easily avoided by using a dependency injection framework for creation of
|
||||
inversion of control container (IoC container).
|
||||
After:
|
||||
|
||||
Example of creation of several inversion of control containers (IoC containers)
|
||||
using :doc:`Dependency Injector <../index>`:
|
||||
.. code-block:: python
|
||||
|
||||
.. literalinclude:: ../../examples/miniapps/engines_cars/example_ioc_containers.py
|
||||
:language: python
|
||||
import os
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class ApiClient:
|
||||
|
||||
def __init__(self, api_key: str, timeout: int):
|
||||
self.api_key = api_key # <-- the dependency is injected
|
||||
self.timeout = timeout # <-- the dependency is injected
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class Service:
|
||||
|
||||
def __init__(self, api_client: ApiClient):
|
||||
self.api_client = api_client # <-- the dependency is injected
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == '__main__':
|
||||
service = Service(ApiClient(os.getenv('API_KEY'), os.getenv('TIMEOUT')))
|
||||
|
||||
``ApiClient`` is decoupled from knowing where the options come from. You can read a key and a
|
||||
timeout from a configuration file or even get them from a database.
|
||||
|
||||
``Service`` is decoupled from the ``ApiClient``. It does not create it anymore. You can provide a
|
||||
stub or other compatible object.
|
||||
|
||||
Flexibility comes with a price.
|
||||
|
||||
Now you need to assemble the objects like this::
|
||||
|
||||
service = Service(ApiClient(os.getenv('API_KEY'), os.getenv('TIMEOUT')))
|
||||
|
||||
The assembly code might get duplicated and it'll become harder to change the application structure.
|
||||
|
||||
Here comes the ``Dependency Injector``.
|
||||
|
||||
What does the Dependency Injector do?
|
||||
-------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
With the dependency injection pattern objects lose the responsibility of assembling the
|
||||
dependencies. The ``Dependency Injector`` absorbs that responsibility.
|
||||
|
||||
``Dependency Injector`` helps to assemble the objects.
|
||||
|
||||
It provides a container and providers that help you with the objects assembly. When you
|
||||
need an object you get it from the container. The rest of the assembly work is done by the
|
||||
framework:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: python
|
||||
|
||||
from dependency_injector import containers, providers
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class Container(containers.DeclarativeContainer):
|
||||
|
||||
config = providers.Configuration()
|
||||
|
||||
api_client = providers.Singleton(
|
||||
ApiClient,
|
||||
api_key=config.api_key,
|
||||
timeout=config.timeout.as_int(),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
service = providers.Factory(
|
||||
Service,
|
||||
api_client=api_client,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == '__main__':
|
||||
container = Container()
|
||||
container.config.api_key.from_env('API_KEY')
|
||||
container.config.timeout.from_env('TIMEOUT')
|
||||
|
||||
service = container.service()
|
||||
|
||||
Retrieving of the ``Service`` instance now is done like this::
|
||||
|
||||
service = container.service()
|
||||
|
||||
Objects assembling is consolidated in the container. When you need to make a change you do it in
|
||||
one place.
|
||||
|
||||
When doing a testing you call the ``container.api_client.override()`` to replace the real API
|
||||
client with a mock:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: python
|
||||
|
||||
from unittest import mock
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
with container.api_client.override(mock.Mock()):
|
||||
service = container.service()
|
||||
|
||||
You can override any provider by another provider.
|
||||
|
||||
It also helps you in configuring project for the different environments: replace an API client
|
||||
with a stub on the dev or stage.
|
||||
|
||||
Testing, Monkey-patching and dependency injection
|
||||
-------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
The testability benefit is opposed to a monkey-patching.
|
||||
|
||||
In Python you can monkey-patch
|
||||
anything, anytime. The problem with a monkey-patching is that it's too fragile. The reason is that
|
||||
when you monkey-patch you do something that wasn't intended to be done. You monkey-patch the
|
||||
implementation details. When implementation changes the monkey-patching is broken.
|
||||
|
||||
With a dependency injection you patch the interface, not an implementation. This is a way more
|
||||
stable approach.
|
||||
|
||||
Also monkey-patching is a way too dirty to be used outside of the testing code for
|
||||
reconfiguring the project for the different environments.
|
||||
|
||||
Conclusion
|
||||
----------
|
||||
|
||||
Dependency injection brings you 3 advantages:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Flexibility**. The components are loosely coupled. You can easily extend or change a
|
||||
functionality of the system by combining the components different way. You even can do it on
|
||||
the fly.
|
||||
- **Testability**. Testing is easy because you can easily inject mocks instead of real objects
|
||||
that use API or database, etc.
|
||||
- **Clearness and maintainability**. Dependency injection helps you reveal the dependencies.
|
||||
Implicit becomes explicit. And "Explicit is better than implicit" (PEP20 - The Zen of Python).
|
||||
You have all the components and dependencies defined explicitly in the container. This
|
||||
provides an overview and control on the application structure. It is easy to understand and
|
||||
change it.
|
||||
|
||||
Is it worth to use a dependency injection in Python?
|
||||
|
||||
It depends on what you build. The advantages above are not too important if you use Python as a
|
||||
scripting language. The picture is different when you use Python to create an application. The
|
||||
larger the application the more significant is the benefit.
|
||||
|
||||
Is it worth to use a framework for the dependency injection?
|
||||
|
||||
The complexity of the dependency injection pattern implementation in Python is
|
||||
lower than in the other languages but it's still in place. It doesn't mean you have to use a
|
||||
framework but using a framework is beneficial because the framework is:
|
||||
|
||||
- Already implemented
|
||||
- Tested on all platforms and versions of Python
|
||||
- Documented
|
||||
- Supported
|
||||
- Known to the other engineers
|
||||
|
||||
Few advices at last:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Give it a try**. Dependency injection is counter-intuitive. Our nature is that
|
||||
when we need something the first thought that comes to our mind is to go and get it. Dependency
|
||||
injection is just like "Wait, I need to state a need instead of getting something right now".
|
||||
It's like a little investment that will pay-off later. The advice is to just give it a try for
|
||||
two weeks. This time will be enough for getting your own impression. If you don't like it you
|
||||
won't lose too much.
|
||||
- **Common sense first**. Use a common sense when apply dependency injection. It is a good
|
||||
principle, but not a silver bullet. If you do it too much you will reveal too much of the
|
||||
implementation details. Experience comes with practice and time.
|
||||
|
||||
What's next?
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
------------
|
||||
|
||||
Choose one of the following as a next step:
|
||||
|
||||
- Look at application examples:
|
||||
- Look at the application examples:
|
||||
- :ref:`application-single-container`
|
||||
- :ref:`application-multiple-containers`
|
||||
- :ref:`decoupled-packages`
|
||||
|
@ -140,11 +259,12 @@ Choose one of the following as a next step:
|
|||
- :ref:`aiohttp-tutorial`
|
||||
- :ref:`asyncio-daemon-tutorial`
|
||||
- :ref:`cli-tutorial`
|
||||
- Know more about the ``Dependency Injector`` :ref:`key-features`
|
||||
- Know more about the :ref:`providers`
|
||||
- Go to the :ref:`contents`
|
||||
|
||||
Useful links
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
------------
|
||||
|
||||
There are some useful links related to dependency injection design pattern
|
||||
that could be used for further reading:
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -3,18 +3,16 @@ Introduction
|
|||
|
||||
.. meta::
|
||||
:keywords: Python,DI,Dependency injection,IoC,Inversion of Control
|
||||
:description: Current section of documentation is designed to give some
|
||||
overview about dependency injection pattern, inversion of
|
||||
control principle and "Dependency Injector" framework.
|
||||
:description: Current section of the documentation is provides an
|
||||
overview of the dependency injection, inversion of
|
||||
control and Dependency Injector framework.
|
||||
|
||||
Current section of documentation is designed to give some overview about
|
||||
dependency injection pattern, inversion of control principle and
|
||||
*Dependency Injector* framework.
|
||||
Current section of the documentation provides an overview of the
|
||||
dependency injection, inversion of control and the ``Dependency Injector`` framework.
|
||||
|
||||
.. toctree::
|
||||
:maxdepth: 2
|
||||
|
||||
what_is_di
|
||||
di_in_python
|
||||
key_features
|
||||
installation
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
|
|||
.. _key-features:
|
||||
|
||||
Key features
|
||||
------------
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,195 +0,0 @@
|
|||
What is dependency injection?
|
||||
-----------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
.. meta::
|
||||
:keywords: Python,DI,Dependency injection,Low coupling,High cohesion
|
||||
:description: This page provides a Python example of what is dependency injection. It tells
|
||||
about benefits of coupling and high cohesion.
|
||||
|
||||
Dependency injection is a principle that helps to decrease coupling and increase cohesion.
|
||||
|
||||
.. image:: images/coupling-cohesion.png
|
||||
|
||||
What is coupling and cohesion?
|
||||
|
||||
Coupling and cohesion are about how tough the components are tied.
|
||||
|
||||
- **High coupling**. If the coupling is high it's like using a superglue or welding. No easy way
|
||||
to disassemble.
|
||||
- **High cohesion**. High cohesion is like using the screws. Very easy to disassemble and
|
||||
assemble back or assemble a different way. It is an alternative to high coupling.
|
||||
|
||||
When the cohesion is high the coupling is low.
|
||||
|
||||
High cohesion brings the flexibility. Your code becomes easier to change and test.
|
||||
|
||||
The example
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
How does dependency injection helps to achieve high cohesion?
|
||||
|
||||
Objects do not create each other anymore. They provide a way to inject the dependencies instead.
|
||||
|
||||
Before:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: python
|
||||
|
||||
import os
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class ApiClient:
|
||||
|
||||
def __init__(self):
|
||||
self.api_key = os.getenv('API_KEY') # <-- the dependency
|
||||
self.timeout = os.getenv('TIMEOUT') # <-- the dependency
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class Service:
|
||||
|
||||
def __init__(self):
|
||||
self.api_client = ApiClient() # <-- the dependency
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == '__main__':
|
||||
service = Service()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
After:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: python
|
||||
|
||||
import os
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class ApiClient:
|
||||
|
||||
def __init__(self, api_key: str, timeout: int):
|
||||
self.api_key = api_key # <-- the dependency is injected
|
||||
self.timeout = timeout # <-- the dependency is injected
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class Service:
|
||||
|
||||
def __init__(self, api_client: ApiClient):
|
||||
self.api_client = api_client # <-- the dependency is injected
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == '__main__':
|
||||
service = Service(ApiClient(os.getenv('API_KEY'), os.getenv('TIMEOUT')))
|
||||
|
||||
``ApiClient`` is decoupled from knowing where the options come from. You can read a key and a
|
||||
timeout from a configuration file or even get them from a database.
|
||||
|
||||
``Service`` is decoupled from the ``ApiClient``. It does not create it anymore. You can provide a
|
||||
stub or other compatible object.
|
||||
|
||||
Flexibility comes with a price.
|
||||
|
||||
Now you need to assemble your objects like this
|
||||
``Service(ApiClient(os.getenv('API_KEY'), os.getenv('TIMEOUT')))``. The assembly code might get
|
||||
duplicated and it'll become harder to change the application structure.
|
||||
|
||||
Here comes the ``Dependency Injector``.
|
||||
|
||||
``Dependency Injector`` helps to assemble the objects.
|
||||
|
||||
It provides you the container and the providers that help you describe objects assembly. When you
|
||||
need an object you get it from the container. The rest of the assembly work is done by the
|
||||
framework:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: python
|
||||
|
||||
from dependency_injector import containers, providers
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class ApiClient:
|
||||
|
||||
def __init__(self, api_key: str, timeout: int):
|
||||
self.api_key = api_key
|
||||
self.timeout = timeout
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class Service:
|
||||
|
||||
def __init__(self, api_client: ApiClient):
|
||||
self.api_client = api_client
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class Container(containers.DeclarativeContainer):
|
||||
|
||||
config = providers.Configuration()
|
||||
|
||||
api_client = providers.Singleton(
|
||||
ApiClient,
|
||||
api_key=config.api_key,
|
||||
timeout=config.timeout.as_int(),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
service = providers.Factory(
|
||||
Service,
|
||||
api_client=api_client,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == '__main__':
|
||||
container = Container()
|
||||
container.config.api_key.from_env('API_KEY')
|
||||
container.config.timeout.from_env('TIMEOUT')
|
||||
|
||||
service = container.service()
|
||||
|
||||
Retrieving of the ``Service`` instance now is done like this ``container.service()``.
|
||||
|
||||
Objects assembling is consolidated in the container. When you need to make a change you do it in
|
||||
one place.
|
||||
|
||||
When doing the testing you call the ``container.api_client.override()`` to replace the real API
|
||||
client with a mock:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: python
|
||||
|
||||
from unittest import mock
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
with container.api_client.override(mock.Mock()):
|
||||
service = container.service()
|
||||
|
||||
How to explain dependency injection to a 5-year-old?
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
Some time ago `user198313`_ posted this `question`_ on the `StackOverflow`_.
|
||||
|
||||
`John Munsch`_ provided a great answer:
|
||||
|
||||
*When you go and get things out of the refrigerator for yourself, you can
|
||||
cause problems. You might leave the door open, you might get something
|
||||
Mommy or Daddy doesn't want you to have. You might even be looking for
|
||||
something we don't even have or which has expired.*
|
||||
|
||||
*What you should be doing is stating a need, "I need something to drink
|
||||
with lunch," and then we will make sure you have something when you sit
|
||||
down to eat.*
|
||||
|
||||
What's next?
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
Choose one of the following as a next step:
|
||||
|
||||
- Look at application examples:
|
||||
- :ref:`application-single-container`
|
||||
- :ref:`application-multiple-containers`
|
||||
- :ref:`decoupled-packages`
|
||||
- Pass the tutorials:
|
||||
- :ref:`flask-tutorial`
|
||||
- :ref:`aiohttp-tutorial`
|
||||
- :ref:`asyncio-daemon-tutorial`
|
||||
- :ref:`cli-tutorial`
|
||||
- Know more about the :ref:`providers`
|
||||
- Go to the :ref:`contents`
|
||||
|
||||
.. disqus::
|
||||
|
||||
.. _StackOverflow: http://stackoverflow.com/
|
||||
.. _question: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1638919/how-to-explain-dependency-injection-to-a-5-year-old/1639186
|
||||
.. _user198313: http://stackoverflow.com/users/198313/user198313
|
||||
.. _John Munsch: http://stackoverflow.com/users/31899/john-munsch
|
|
@ -7,6 +7,13 @@ that were made in every particular version.
|
|||
From version 0.7.6 *Dependency Injector* framework strictly
|
||||
follows `Semantic versioning`_
|
||||
|
||||
3.42.0
|
||||
------
|
||||
- Update "DI in Python" documentation page.
|
||||
- Delete "What is DI?" documentation page.
|
||||
- Delete "engines cars" example mini app.
|
||||
- Update README.
|
||||
|
||||
3.41.0
|
||||
------
|
||||
- Refactor "use cases" example.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,9 +0,0 @@
|
|||
Engines & Cars Dependency Injection Example
|
||||
===========================================
|
||||
|
||||
Instructions for running:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: bash
|
||||
|
||||
python example_di.py
|
||||
python example_ioc_containers.py
|
|
@ -1 +0,0 @@
|
|||
"""Example top-level package."""
|
|
@ -1,9 +0,0 @@
|
|||
"""Dependency injection example, cars module."""
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class Car:
|
||||
"""Example car."""
|
||||
|
||||
def __init__(self, engine):
|
||||
"""Initialize instance."""
|
||||
self._engine = engine # Engine is injected
|
|
@ -1,21 +0,0 @@
|
|||
"""Dependency injection example, engines module."""
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class Engine:
|
||||
"""Example engine base class.
|
||||
|
||||
Engine is a heart of every car. Engine is a very common term and
|
||||
could be implemented in very different ways.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class GasolineEngine(Engine):
|
||||
"""Gasoline engine."""
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class DieselEngine(Engine):
|
||||
"""Diesel engine."""
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class ElectricEngine(Engine):
|
||||
"""Electric engine."""
|
|
@ -1,10 +0,0 @@
|
|||
"""Dependency injection example, Cars & Engines."""
|
||||
|
||||
import example.cars
|
||||
import example.engines
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == '__main__':
|
||||
gasoline_car = example.cars.Car(example.engines.GasolineEngine())
|
||||
diesel_car = example.cars.Car(example.engines.DieselEngine())
|
||||
electric_car = example.cars.Car(example.engines.ElectricEngine())
|
|
@ -1,36 +0,0 @@
|
|||
"""Dependency injection example, Cars & Engines IoC containers."""
|
||||
|
||||
import example.cars
|
||||
import example.engines
|
||||
|
||||
import dependency_injector.containers as containers
|
||||
import dependency_injector.providers as providers
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class Engines(containers.DeclarativeContainer):
|
||||
"""IoC container of engine providers."""
|
||||
|
||||
gasoline = providers.Factory(example.engines.GasolineEngine)
|
||||
|
||||
diesel = providers.Factory(example.engines.DieselEngine)
|
||||
|
||||
electric = providers.Factory(example.engines.ElectricEngine)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class Cars(containers.DeclarativeContainer):
|
||||
"""IoC container of car providers."""
|
||||
|
||||
gasoline = providers.Factory(example.cars.Car,
|
||||
engine=Engines.gasoline)
|
||||
|
||||
diesel = providers.Factory(example.cars.Car,
|
||||
engine=Engines.diesel)
|
||||
|
||||
electric = providers.Factory(example.cars.Car,
|
||||
engine=Engines.electric)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == '__main__':
|
||||
gasoline_car = Cars.gasoline()
|
||||
diesel_car = Cars.diesel()
|
||||
electric_car = Cars.electric()
|
|
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|||
"""Dependency injector top-level package."""
|
||||
|
||||
__version__ = '3.41.0'
|
||||
__version__ = '3.42.0'
|
||||
"""Version number that follows semantic versioning.
|
||||
|
||||
:type: str
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user