mirror of
				https://github.com/ets-labs/python-dependency-injector.git
				synced 2025-10-31 16:07:51 +03:00 
			
		
		
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
		
			145 lines
		
	
	
		
			5.9 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			ReStructuredText
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			145 lines
		
	
	
		
			5.9 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			ReStructuredText
		
	
	
	
	
	
| Dependency injection and inversion of control in Python
 | |
| -------------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. meta::
 | |
|    :keywords: Python,DI,Dependency injection,IoC,Inversion of Control
 | |
|    :description: This article describes benefits of dependency injection and 
 | |
|                  inversion of control for Python applications. Also it 
 | |
|                  contains some Python examples that show how dependency 
 | |
|                  injection and inversion could be implemented. In addition, it 
 | |
|                  demonstrates usage of dependency injection framework, 
 | |
|                  IoC container and such popular design pattern as Factory.
 | |
| 
 | |
| History
 | |
| ~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| Originally, dependency injection pattern got popular in languages with static 
 | |
| typing, like Java. Dependency injection framework can 
 | |
| significantly improve flexibility of the language with static typing. Also,
 | |
| implementation of dependency injection framework for language with static 
 | |
| typing is not something that one can do shortly, it could be quite complex 
 | |
| thing to be done well.
 | |
| 
 | |
| While Python is very flexible interpreted language with dynamic typing, there 
 | |
| is a meaning that dependency injection doesn't work for it as well, as it does 
 | |
| for Java. Also there is a meaning that dependency injection framework is 
 | |
| something that Python developer would not ever need, cause dependency injection
 | |
| could be implemented easily using language fundamentals.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Discussion
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| It is true. 
 | |
| 
 | |
| Partly.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Dependency injection, as a software design pattern, has number of 
 | |
| advantages that are common for each language (including Python):
 | |
| 
 | |
| + Dependency Injection decreases coupling between a class and its dependency.
 | |
| + Because dependency injection doesn't require any change in code behavior it 
 | |
|   can be applied to legacy code as a refactoring. The result is clients that 
 | |
|   are more independent and that are easier to unit test in isolation using 
 | |
|   stubs or mock objects that simulate other objects not under test. This ease 
 | |
|   of testing is often the first benefit noticed when using dependency 
 | |
|   injection.
 | |
| + Dependency injection can be used to externalize a system's configuration 
 | |
|   details into configuration files allowing the system to be reconfigured 
 | |
|   without recompilation (rebuilding). Separate configurations can be written 
 | |
|   for different situations that require different implementations of 
 | |
|   components. This includes, but is not limited to, testing.
 | |
| + Reduction of boilerplate code in the application objects since all work to 
 | |
|   initialize or set up dependencies is handled by a provider component.
 | |
| + Dependency injection allows a client to remove all knowledge of a concrete 
 | |
|   implementation that it needs to use. This helps isolate the client from the 
 | |
|   impact of design changes and defects. It promotes reusability, testability 
 | |
|   and maintainability.
 | |
| + Dependency injection allows a client the flexibility of being configurable. 
 | |
|   Only the client's behavior is fixed. The client may act on anything that 
 | |
|   supports the intrinsic interface the client expects.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. note::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     While improved testability is one the first benefits of using dependency 
 | |
|     injection, it could be easily overwhelmed by monkey-patching technique, 
 | |
|     that works absolutely great in Python (you can monkey-patch anything, 
 | |
|     anytime).  At the same time, monkey-patching has nothing similar with 
 | |
|     other advantages defined above. Also monkey-patching technique is 
 | |
|     something that could be considered like too dirty to be used in production.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The complexity of dependency injection pattern implementation in Python is 
 | |
| definitely quite lower than in other languages (even with dynamic typing). 
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. note:: 
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Low complexity of dependency injection pattern implementation in Python 
 | |
|     still means that some code should be written, reviewed, tested and 
 | |
|     supported.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Talking about inversion of control, it is a software design principle that 
 | |
| also works for each programming language, not depending on its typing type.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Inversion of control is used to increase modularity of the program and make 
 | |
| it extensible.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Main design purposes of using inversion of control are:
 | |
| 
 | |
| + To decouple the execution of a task from implementation.
 | |
| + To focus a module on the task it is designed for.
 | |
| + To free modules from assumptions about how other systems do what they do and 
 | |
|   instead rely on contracts.
 | |
| + To prevent side effects when replacing a module.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example
 | |
| ~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| Let's go through next example:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. image:: /images/miniapps/engines_cars/diagram.png
 | |
|     :width: 100%
 | |
|     :align: center
 | |
| 
 | |
| Listing of ``example.engines`` module:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. literalinclude:: ../../examples/miniapps/engines_cars/example/engines.py
 | |
|    :language: python
 | |
|    :linenos:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Listing of ``example.cars`` module:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. literalinclude:: ../../examples/miniapps/engines_cars/example/cars.py
 | |
|    :language: python
 | |
|    :linenos:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Next example demonstrates creation of several cars with different engines:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. literalinclude:: ../../examples/miniapps/engines_cars/example_di.py
 | |
|    :language: python
 | |
|    :linenos:
 | |
| 
 | |
| While previous example demonstrates advantages of dependency injection, there 
 | |
| is a disadvantage demonstration as well - creation of car requires additional 
 | |
| code for specification of dependencies. Nevertheless, this disadvantage could 
 | |
| be easily avoided by using a dependency injection framework for creation of 
 | |
| inversion of control container (IoC container).
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example of creation of several inversion of control containers (IoC containers)
 | |
| using :doc:`Dependency Injector <../index>`:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. literalinclude:: ../../examples/miniapps/engines_cars/example_ioc_containers.py
 | |
|    :language: python
 | |
|    :linenos:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Useful links
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| There are some useful links related to dependency injection design pattern 
 | |
| that could be used for further reading:
 | |
| 
 | |
| + https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dependency_injection
 | |
| + https://martinfowler.com/articles/injection.html
 | |
| + https://github.com/ets-labs/python-dependency-injector
 | |
| + https://pypi.org/project/dependency-injector/
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. disqus::
 |