mirror of
https://github.com/ets-labs/python-dependency-injector.git
synced 2024-11-30 05:23:59 +03:00
feed916f46
* Add support of async injections into wiring * Add support of async functions and async generators for resources * Update resource provider typing stub for stutdown * Add resource base class for async resources * Fix tests * Add tests for async injections in wiring @inject * Refactor provider tests * Add tests for async resources * Rework async resources callbacks to .add_done_callback() style (fixes pypy3 issue) * Add awaits into async resource class test * Refactor FastAPI tests * Implement async resources initialization in container * Move container async resource tests to a separate module for Python 3.6+ * Fix init async resources in container on Python 2 * Add first dirty async injections implementation * Fix isawaitable error * Turm asyncio import to conditional for safer Py2 usage * Refactor kwargs injections * Implement positional injections, add tests and make refactoring * Implement attribute injections and add tests * Add singleton implementation + tests for all singleton types * Implement injections in thread-local and thread-safe singleton providers * Update .provided + fix resource concurent initialization issue * Implement async mode for Dependency provider * Add async mode for the provider * Add overload for Factory typing * Add typing stubs for async resource * Refactor abstract* providers __call__() * Add async mode API + tests * Add typing stubs & tests for async mode API * Add tests for async mode auto configuration * Refactor Provider.__call__() to use async mode api * Refactor Dependency provider to use async mode api * Add tests for Dependency provider async mode * Add support of async mode for FactoryAggregate provider + tests * Refactor Singleton provider to use async mode api * Refactor ThreadSafeSingleton provider to use async mode api * Refactor ThreadLocalSingleton provider to use async mode api * Finish Singleton refactoring to use async mode api * Refactor Resource provider to use async mode api * Add Provider.async_() method + tests * Add typing stubs for async_() method + tests * Refactor Singleton typing stubs to return singleton from argument methods * Refactor provider typing stubs * Improve resource typing stub * Add tests for async context kwargs injections * Fix typo in resource provider tests * Cover shutdown of not initialized resource * Add test to cover resource initialization with an error * Fix Singleton and ThreadLocalSingleton to handle initialization errors * Add FastAPI + Redis example * Make cosmetic fixes to FastAPI + Redis example * Add missing development requirements * Update module docblock in fastapi + redis example * Add FastAPI + Redis example docs * Add references to FastAPI + Redis example * Refactor resource docs * Add asynchronous resources docs * Refactor wiring docs * Add async injections docs for wiring * Add async injections page and update docs index, readme, and key features pages * Add providers async injections example * Add docs on provider async mode enabling * Reword async provider docs * Add provider async mode docs * Add cross links to async docs * Mute flake8 errors in async provider examples * Update changelog * Make cosmetic fix to containers.pyx
313 lines
11 KiB
ReStructuredText
313 lines
11 KiB
ReStructuredText
Dependency injection and inversion of control in Python
|
|
=======================================================
|
|
|
|
.. meta::
|
|
:keywords: Python,DI,Dependency injection,IoC,Inversion of Control,Example
|
|
:description: This page describes a usage of the dependency injection and inversion of control
|
|
in Python. It contains Python examples that show how to implement dependency
|
|
injection. It demonstrates a usage of the dependency injection framework
|
|
Dependency Injector, its container, Factory, Singleton and Configuration
|
|
providers. The example show how to use Dependency Injector providers overriding
|
|
feature for testing or configuring project in different environments and explains
|
|
why it's better then monkey-patching.
|
|
|
|
Originally dependency injection pattern got popular in the languages with a static typing,
|
|
like Java. Dependency injection is a principle that helps to achieve an inversion of control.
|
|
Dependency injection framework can significantly improve a flexibility of the language
|
|
with a static typing. Implementation of a dependency injection framework for a language
|
|
with a static typing is not something that one can do quickly. It will be a quite complex thing
|
|
to be done well. And will take time.
|
|
|
|
Python is an interpreted language with a dynamic typing. There is an opinion that dependency
|
|
injection doesn't work for it as well as it does for Java. A lot of the flexibility is already
|
|
built in. Also there is an opinion that a dependency injection framework is something that
|
|
Python developer rarely needs. Python developers say that dependency injection can be implemented
|
|
easily using language fundamentals.
|
|
|
|
This page describes the advantages of the dependency injection usage in Python. It
|
|
contains Python examples that show how to implement dependency injection. It demonstrates a usage
|
|
of the dependency injection framework ``Dependency Injector``, its container, ``Factory``,
|
|
``Singleton`` and ``Configuration`` providers. The example shows how to use ``Dependency Injector``
|
|
providers overriding feature for testing or configuring project in different environments and
|
|
explains why it's better then monkey-patching.
|
|
|
|
What is dependency injection?
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
|
|
Let's see what the dependency injection is.
|
|
|
|
Dependency injection is a principle that helps to decrease coupling and increase cohesion.
|
|
|
|
.. image:: images/coupling-cohesion.png
|
|
|
|
What is coupling and cohesion?
|
|
|
|
Coupling and cohesion are about how tough the components are tied.
|
|
|
|
- **High coupling**. If the coupling is high it's like using a superglue or welding. No easy way
|
|
to disassemble.
|
|
- **High cohesion**. High cohesion is like using the screws. Very easy to disassemble and
|
|
assemble back or assemble a different way. It is an opposite to high coupling.
|
|
|
|
When the cohesion is high the coupling is low.
|
|
|
|
Low coupling brings a flexibility. Your code becomes easier to change and test.
|
|
|
|
How to implement the dependency injection?
|
|
|
|
Objects do not create each other anymore. They provide a way to inject the dependencies instead.
|
|
|
|
Before:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: python
|
|
|
|
import os
|
|
|
|
|
|
class ApiClient:
|
|
|
|
def __init__(self):
|
|
self.api_key = os.getenv('API_KEY') # <-- dependency
|
|
self.timeout = os.getenv('TIMEOUT') # <-- dependency
|
|
|
|
|
|
class Service:
|
|
|
|
def __init__(self):
|
|
self.api_client = ApiClient() # <-- dependency
|
|
|
|
|
|
def main() -> None:
|
|
service = Service() # <-- dependency
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
|
|
if __name__ == '__main__':
|
|
main()
|
|
|
|
After:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: python
|
|
|
|
import os
|
|
|
|
|
|
class ApiClient:
|
|
|
|
def __init__(self, api_key: str, timeout: int):
|
|
self.api_key = api_key # <-- dependency is injected
|
|
self.timeout = timeout # <-- dependency is injected
|
|
|
|
|
|
class Service:
|
|
|
|
def __init__(self, api_client: ApiClient):
|
|
self.api_client = api_client # <-- dependency is injected
|
|
|
|
|
|
def main(service: Service): # <-- dependency is injected
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
|
|
if __name__ == '__main__':
|
|
main(
|
|
service=Service(
|
|
api_client=ApiClient(
|
|
api_key=os.getenv('API_KEY'),
|
|
timeout=os.getenv('TIMEOUT'),
|
|
),
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
``ApiClient`` is decoupled from knowing where the options come from. You can read a key and a
|
|
timeout from a configuration file or even get them from a database.
|
|
|
|
``Service`` is decoupled from the ``ApiClient``. It does not create it anymore. You can provide a
|
|
stub or other compatible object.
|
|
|
|
Function ``main()`` is decoupled from ``Service``. It receives it as an argument.
|
|
|
|
Flexibility comes with a price.
|
|
|
|
Now you need to assemble and inject the objects like this:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: python
|
|
|
|
main(
|
|
service=Service(
|
|
api_client=ApiClient(
|
|
api_key=os.getenv('API_KEY'),
|
|
timeout=os.getenv('TIMEOUT'),
|
|
),
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
The assembly code might get duplicated and it'll become harder to change the application structure.
|
|
|
|
Here comes the ``Dependency Injector``.
|
|
|
|
What does the Dependency Injector do?
|
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
With the dependency injection pattern objects loose the responsibility of assembling
|
|
the dependencies. The ``Dependency Injector`` absorbs that responsibilities.
|
|
|
|
``Dependency Injector`` helps to assemble and inject the dependencies.
|
|
|
|
It provides a container and providers that help you with the objects assembly.
|
|
When you need an object you place a ``Provide`` marker as a default value of a
|
|
function argument. When you call this function framework assembles and injects
|
|
the dependency.
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: python
|
|
|
|
from dependency_injector import containers, providers
|
|
from dependency_injector.wiring import inject, Provide
|
|
|
|
|
|
class Container(containers.DeclarativeContainer):
|
|
|
|
config = providers.Configuration()
|
|
|
|
api_client = providers.Singleton(
|
|
ApiClient,
|
|
api_key=config.api_key,
|
|
timeout=config.timeout.as_int(),
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
service = providers.Factory(
|
|
Service,
|
|
api_client=api_client,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
@inject
|
|
def main(service: Service = Provide[Container.service]):
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
|
|
if __name__ == '__main__':
|
|
container = Container()
|
|
container.config.api_key.from_env('API_KEY')
|
|
container.config.timeout.from_env('TIMEOUT')
|
|
container.wire(modules=[sys.modules[__name__]])
|
|
|
|
main() # <-- dependency is injected automatically
|
|
|
|
with container.api_client.override(mock.Mock()):
|
|
main() # <-- overridden dependency is injected automatically
|
|
|
|
When you call ``main()`` function the ``Service`` dependency is assembled and injected automatically.
|
|
|
|
When doing a testing you call the ``container.api_client.override()`` to replace the real API
|
|
client with a mock. When you call ``main()`` the mock is injected.
|
|
|
|
You can override any provider with another provider.
|
|
|
|
It also helps you in configuring project for the different environments: replace an API client
|
|
with a stub on the dev or stage.
|
|
|
|
Objects assembling is consolidated in the container. Dependency injections are defined explicitly.
|
|
This makes easier to understand and change how application works.
|
|
|
|
Testing, Monkey-patching and dependency injection
|
|
-------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
The testability benefit is opposed to a monkey-patching.
|
|
|
|
In Python you can monkey-patch
|
|
anything, anytime. The problem with a monkey-patching is that it's too fragile. The reason is that
|
|
when you monkey-patch you do something that wasn't intended to be done. You monkey-patch the
|
|
implementation details. When implementation changes the monkey-patching is broken.
|
|
|
|
With a dependency injection you patch the interface, not an implementation. This is a way more
|
|
stable approach.
|
|
|
|
Also monkey-patching is a way too dirty to be used outside of the testing code for
|
|
reconfiguring the project for the different environments.
|
|
|
|
Conclusion
|
|
----------
|
|
|
|
Dependency injection brings you 3 advantages:
|
|
|
|
- **Flexibility**. The components are loosely coupled. You can easily extend or change a
|
|
functionality of the system by combining the components different way. You even can do it on
|
|
the fly.
|
|
- **Testability**. Testing is easy because you can easily inject mocks instead of real objects
|
|
that use API or database, etc.
|
|
- **Clearness and maintainability**. Dependency injection helps you reveal the dependencies.
|
|
Implicit becomes explicit. And "Explicit is better than implicit" (PEP 20 - The Zen of Python).
|
|
You have all the components and dependencies defined explicitly in the container. This
|
|
provides an overview and control on the application structure. It is easy to understand and
|
|
change it.
|
|
|
|
Is it worth to use a dependency injection in Python?
|
|
|
|
It depends on what you build. The advantages above are not too important if you use Python as a
|
|
scripting language. The picture is different when you use Python to create an application. The
|
|
larger the application the more significant is the benefit.
|
|
|
|
Is it worth to use a framework for the dependency injection?
|
|
|
|
The complexity of the dependency injection pattern implementation in Python is
|
|
lower than in the other languages but it's still in place. It doesn't mean you have to use a
|
|
framework but using a framework is beneficial because the framework is:
|
|
|
|
- Already implemented
|
|
- Tested on all platforms and versions of Python
|
|
- Documented
|
|
- Supported
|
|
- Known to the other engineers
|
|
|
|
Few advices at last:
|
|
|
|
- **Give it a try**. Dependency injection is counter-intuitive. Our nature is that
|
|
when we need something the first thought that comes to our mind is to go and get it. Dependency
|
|
injection is just like "Wait, I need to state a need instead of getting something right now".
|
|
It's like a little investment that will pay-off later. The advice is to just give it a try for
|
|
two weeks. This time will be enough for getting your own impression. If you don't like it you
|
|
won't lose too much.
|
|
- **Common sense first**. Use a common sense when apply dependency injection. It is a good
|
|
principle, but not a silver bullet. If you do it too much you will reveal too much of the
|
|
implementation details. Experience comes with practice and time.
|
|
|
|
What's next?
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
Choose one of the following as a next step:
|
|
|
|
- Look at the application examples:
|
|
- :ref:`application-single-container`
|
|
- :ref:`application-multiple-containers`
|
|
- :ref:`decoupled-packages`
|
|
- :ref:`django-example`
|
|
- :ref:`flask-example`
|
|
- :ref:`flask-blueprints-example`
|
|
- :ref:`aiohttp-example`
|
|
- :ref:`sanic-example`
|
|
- :ref:`fastapi-example`
|
|
- :ref:`fastapi-redis-example`
|
|
- Pass the tutorials:
|
|
- :ref:`flask-tutorial`
|
|
- :ref:`aiohttp-tutorial`
|
|
- :ref:`asyncio-daemon-tutorial`
|
|
- :ref:`cli-tutorial`
|
|
- Know more about the ``Dependency Injector`` :ref:`key-features`
|
|
- Know more about the :ref:`providers`
|
|
- Know more about the :ref:`wiring`
|
|
- Go to the :ref:`contents`
|
|
|
|
Useful links
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
There are some useful links related to dependency injection design pattern
|
|
that could be used for further reading:
|
|
|
|
+ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dependency_injection
|
|
+ https://martinfowler.com/articles/injection.html
|
|
+ https://github.com/ets-labs/python-dependency-injector
|
|
+ https://pypi.org/project/dependency-injector/
|
|
|
|
.. disqus::
|