2019-05-24 15:06:04 +03:00
---
title: Scorer
teaser: Compute evaluation scores
tag: class
source: spacy/scorer.py
---
Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility (#5731)
* Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility
Refactor the `Scorer` to improve flexibility for arbitrary pipeline
components.
* Individual pipeline components provide their own `evaluate` methods
that score a list of `Example`s and return a dictionary of scores
* `Scorer` is initialized either:
* with a provided pipeline containing components to be scored
* with a default pipeline containing the built-in statistical
components (senter, tagger, morphologizer, parser, ner)
* `Scorer.score` evaluates a list of `Example`s and returns a dictionary
of scores referring to the scores provided by the components in the
pipeline
Significant differences:
* `tags_acc` is renamed to `tag_acc` to be consistent with `token_acc`
and the new `morph_acc`, `pos_acc`, and `lemma_acc`
* Scoring is no longer cumulative: `Scorer.score` scores a list of
examples rather than a single example and does not retain any state
about previously scored examples
* PRF values in the returned scores are no longer multiplied by 100
* Add kwargs to Morphologizer.evaluate
* Create generalized scoring methods in Scorer
* Generalized static scoring methods are added to `Scorer`
* Methods require an attribute (either on Token or Doc) that is
used to key the returned scores
Naming differences:
* `uas`, `las`, and `las_per_type` in the scores dict are renamed to
`dep_uas`, `dep_las`, and `dep_las_per_type`
Scoring differences:
* `Doc.sents` is now scored as spans rather than on sentence-initial
token positions so that `Doc.sents` and `Doc.ents` can be scored with
the same method (this lowers scores since a single incorrect sentence
start results in two incorrect spans)
* Simplify / extend hasattr check for eval method
* Add hasattr check to tokenizer scoring
* Simplify to hasattr check for component scoring
* Reset Example alignment if docs are set
Reset the Example alignment if either doc is set in case the
tokenization has changed.
* Add PRF tokenization scoring for tokens as spans
Add PRF scores for tokens as character spans. The scores are:
* token_acc: # correct tokens / # gold tokens
* token_p/r/f: PRF for (token.idx, token.idx + len(token))
* Add docstring to Scorer.score_tokenization
* Rename component.evaluate() to component.score()
* Update Scorer API docs
* Update scoring for positive_label in textcat
* Fix TextCategorizer.score kwargs
* Update Language.evaluate docs
* Update score names in default config
2020-07-25 13:53:02 +03:00
The `Scorer` computes evaluation scores. It's typically created by
2020-07-28 22:39:42 +03:00
[`Language.evaluate` ](/api/language#evaluate ). In addition, the `Scorer`
provides a number of evaluation methods for evaluating [`Token` ](/api/token ) and
[`Doc` ](/api/doc ) attributes.
Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility (#5731)
* Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility
Refactor the `Scorer` to improve flexibility for arbitrary pipeline
components.
* Individual pipeline components provide their own `evaluate` methods
that score a list of `Example`s and return a dictionary of scores
* `Scorer` is initialized either:
* with a provided pipeline containing components to be scored
* with a default pipeline containing the built-in statistical
components (senter, tagger, morphologizer, parser, ner)
* `Scorer.score` evaluates a list of `Example`s and returns a dictionary
of scores referring to the scores provided by the components in the
pipeline
Significant differences:
* `tags_acc` is renamed to `tag_acc` to be consistent with `token_acc`
and the new `morph_acc`, `pos_acc`, and `lemma_acc`
* Scoring is no longer cumulative: `Scorer.score` scores a list of
examples rather than a single example and does not retain any state
about previously scored examples
* PRF values in the returned scores are no longer multiplied by 100
* Add kwargs to Morphologizer.evaluate
* Create generalized scoring methods in Scorer
* Generalized static scoring methods are added to `Scorer`
* Methods require an attribute (either on Token or Doc) that is
used to key the returned scores
Naming differences:
* `uas`, `las`, and `las_per_type` in the scores dict are renamed to
`dep_uas`, `dep_las`, and `dep_las_per_type`
Scoring differences:
* `Doc.sents` is now scored as spans rather than on sentence-initial
token positions so that `Doc.sents` and `Doc.ents` can be scored with
the same method (this lowers scores since a single incorrect sentence
start results in two incorrect spans)
* Simplify / extend hasattr check for eval method
* Add hasattr check to tokenizer scoring
* Simplify to hasattr check for component scoring
* Reset Example alignment if docs are set
Reset the Example alignment if either doc is set in case the
tokenization has changed.
* Add PRF tokenization scoring for tokens as spans
Add PRF scores for tokens as character spans. The scores are:
* token_acc: # correct tokens / # gold tokens
* token_p/r/f: PRF for (token.idx, token.idx + len(token))
* Add docstring to Scorer.score_tokenization
* Rename component.evaluate() to component.score()
* Update Scorer API docs
* Update scoring for positive_label in textcat
* Fix TextCategorizer.score kwargs
* Update Language.evaluate docs
* Update score names in default config
2020-07-25 13:53:02 +03:00
2019-05-24 15:06:04 +03:00
## Scorer.\_\_init\_\_ {#init tag="method"}
Create a new `Scorer` .
> #### Example
>
> ```python
> from spacy.scorer import Scorer
>
2020-07-28 22:39:42 +03:00
> # Default scoring pipeline
2019-05-24 15:06:04 +03:00
> scorer = Scorer()
Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility (#5731)
* Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility
Refactor the `Scorer` to improve flexibility for arbitrary pipeline
components.
* Individual pipeline components provide their own `evaluate` methods
that score a list of `Example`s and return a dictionary of scores
* `Scorer` is initialized either:
* with a provided pipeline containing components to be scored
* with a default pipeline containing the built-in statistical
components (senter, tagger, morphologizer, parser, ner)
* `Scorer.score` evaluates a list of `Example`s and returns a dictionary
of scores referring to the scores provided by the components in the
pipeline
Significant differences:
* `tags_acc` is renamed to `tag_acc` to be consistent with `token_acc`
and the new `morph_acc`, `pos_acc`, and `lemma_acc`
* Scoring is no longer cumulative: `Scorer.score` scores a list of
examples rather than a single example and does not retain any state
about previously scored examples
* PRF values in the returned scores are no longer multiplied by 100
* Add kwargs to Morphologizer.evaluate
* Create generalized scoring methods in Scorer
* Generalized static scoring methods are added to `Scorer`
* Methods require an attribute (either on Token or Doc) that is
used to key the returned scores
Naming differences:
* `uas`, `las`, and `las_per_type` in the scores dict are renamed to
`dep_uas`, `dep_las`, and `dep_las_per_type`
Scoring differences:
* `Doc.sents` is now scored as spans rather than on sentence-initial
token positions so that `Doc.sents` and `Doc.ents` can be scored with
the same method (this lowers scores since a single incorrect sentence
start results in two incorrect spans)
* Simplify / extend hasattr check for eval method
* Add hasattr check to tokenizer scoring
* Simplify to hasattr check for component scoring
* Reset Example alignment if docs are set
Reset the Example alignment if either doc is set in case the
tokenization has changed.
* Add PRF tokenization scoring for tokens as spans
Add PRF scores for tokens as character spans. The scores are:
* token_acc: # correct tokens / # gold tokens
* token_p/r/f: PRF for (token.idx, token.idx + len(token))
* Add docstring to Scorer.score_tokenization
* Rename component.evaluate() to component.score()
* Update Scorer API docs
* Update scoring for positive_label in textcat
* Fix TextCategorizer.score kwargs
* Update Language.evaluate docs
* Update score names in default config
2020-07-25 13:53:02 +03:00
>
2020-07-28 22:39:42 +03:00
> # Provided scoring pipeline
Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility (#5731)
* Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility
Refactor the `Scorer` to improve flexibility for arbitrary pipeline
components.
* Individual pipeline components provide their own `evaluate` methods
that score a list of `Example`s and return a dictionary of scores
* `Scorer` is initialized either:
* with a provided pipeline containing components to be scored
* with a default pipeline containing the built-in statistical
components (senter, tagger, morphologizer, parser, ner)
* `Scorer.score` evaluates a list of `Example`s and returns a dictionary
of scores referring to the scores provided by the components in the
pipeline
Significant differences:
* `tags_acc` is renamed to `tag_acc` to be consistent with `token_acc`
and the new `morph_acc`, `pos_acc`, and `lemma_acc`
* Scoring is no longer cumulative: `Scorer.score` scores a list of
examples rather than a single example and does not retain any state
about previously scored examples
* PRF values in the returned scores are no longer multiplied by 100
* Add kwargs to Morphologizer.evaluate
* Create generalized scoring methods in Scorer
* Generalized static scoring methods are added to `Scorer`
* Methods require an attribute (either on Token or Doc) that is
used to key the returned scores
Naming differences:
* `uas`, `las`, and `las_per_type` in the scores dict are renamed to
`dep_uas`, `dep_las`, and `dep_las_per_type`
Scoring differences:
* `Doc.sents` is now scored as spans rather than on sentence-initial
token positions so that `Doc.sents` and `Doc.ents` can be scored with
the same method (this lowers scores since a single incorrect sentence
start results in two incorrect spans)
* Simplify / extend hasattr check for eval method
* Add hasattr check to tokenizer scoring
* Simplify to hasattr check for component scoring
* Reset Example alignment if docs are set
Reset the Example alignment if either doc is set in case the
tokenization has changed.
* Add PRF tokenization scoring for tokens as spans
Add PRF scores for tokens as character spans. The scores are:
* token_acc: # correct tokens / # gold tokens
* token_p/r/f: PRF for (token.idx, token.idx + len(token))
* Add docstring to Scorer.score_tokenization
* Rename component.evaluate() to component.score()
* Update Scorer API docs
* Update scoring for positive_label in textcat
* Fix TextCategorizer.score kwargs
* Update Language.evaluate docs
* Update score names in default config
2020-07-25 13:53:02 +03:00
> nlp = spacy.load("en_core_web_sm")
> scorer = Scorer(nlp)
2019-05-24 15:06:04 +03:00
> ```
2021-08-12 13:50:03 +03:00
| Name | Description |
| ------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| `nlp` | The pipeline to use for scoring, where each pipeline component may provide a scoring method. If none is provided, then a default pipeline is constructed using the `default_lang` and `default_pipeline` settings. ~~Optional[Language]~~ |
| `default_lang` | The language to use for a default pipeline if `nlp` is not provided. Defaults to `xx` . ~~str~~ |
| `default_pipeline` | The pipeline components to use for a default pipeline if `nlp` is not provided. Defaults to `("senter", "tagger", "morphologizer", "parser", "ner", "textcat")` . ~~Iterable[string]~~ |
| _keyword-only_ | |
| `\*\*kwargs` | Any additional settings to pass on to the individual scoring methods. ~~Any~~ |
2019-05-24 15:06:04 +03:00
## Scorer.score {#score tag="method"}
Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility (#5731)
* Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility
Refactor the `Scorer` to improve flexibility for arbitrary pipeline
components.
* Individual pipeline components provide their own `evaluate` methods
that score a list of `Example`s and return a dictionary of scores
* `Scorer` is initialized either:
* with a provided pipeline containing components to be scored
* with a default pipeline containing the built-in statistical
components (senter, tagger, morphologizer, parser, ner)
* `Scorer.score` evaluates a list of `Example`s and returns a dictionary
of scores referring to the scores provided by the components in the
pipeline
Significant differences:
* `tags_acc` is renamed to `tag_acc` to be consistent with `token_acc`
and the new `morph_acc`, `pos_acc`, and `lemma_acc`
* Scoring is no longer cumulative: `Scorer.score` scores a list of
examples rather than a single example and does not retain any state
about previously scored examples
* PRF values in the returned scores are no longer multiplied by 100
* Add kwargs to Morphologizer.evaluate
* Create generalized scoring methods in Scorer
* Generalized static scoring methods are added to `Scorer`
* Methods require an attribute (either on Token or Doc) that is
used to key the returned scores
Naming differences:
* `uas`, `las`, and `las_per_type` in the scores dict are renamed to
`dep_uas`, `dep_las`, and `dep_las_per_type`
Scoring differences:
* `Doc.sents` is now scored as spans rather than on sentence-initial
token positions so that `Doc.sents` and `Doc.ents` can be scored with
the same method (this lowers scores since a single incorrect sentence
start results in two incorrect spans)
* Simplify / extend hasattr check for eval method
* Add hasattr check to tokenizer scoring
* Simplify to hasattr check for component scoring
* Reset Example alignment if docs are set
Reset the Example alignment if either doc is set in case the
tokenization has changed.
* Add PRF tokenization scoring for tokens as spans
Add PRF scores for tokens as character spans. The scores are:
* token_acc: # correct tokens / # gold tokens
* token_p/r/f: PRF for (token.idx, token.idx + len(token))
* Add docstring to Scorer.score_tokenization
* Rename component.evaluate() to component.score()
* Update Scorer API docs
* Update scoring for positive_label in textcat
* Fix TextCategorizer.score kwargs
* Update Language.evaluate docs
* Update score names in default config
2020-07-25 13:53:02 +03:00
Calculate the scores for a list of [`Example` ](/api/example ) objects using the
scoring methods provided by the components in the pipeline.
2019-05-24 15:06:04 +03:00
Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility (#5731)
* Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility
Refactor the `Scorer` to improve flexibility for arbitrary pipeline
components.
* Individual pipeline components provide their own `evaluate` methods
that score a list of `Example`s and return a dictionary of scores
* `Scorer` is initialized either:
* with a provided pipeline containing components to be scored
* with a default pipeline containing the built-in statistical
components (senter, tagger, morphologizer, parser, ner)
* `Scorer.score` evaluates a list of `Example`s and returns a dictionary
of scores referring to the scores provided by the components in the
pipeline
Significant differences:
* `tags_acc` is renamed to `tag_acc` to be consistent with `token_acc`
and the new `morph_acc`, `pos_acc`, and `lemma_acc`
* Scoring is no longer cumulative: `Scorer.score` scores a list of
examples rather than a single example and does not retain any state
about previously scored examples
* PRF values in the returned scores are no longer multiplied by 100
* Add kwargs to Morphologizer.evaluate
* Create generalized scoring methods in Scorer
* Generalized static scoring methods are added to `Scorer`
* Methods require an attribute (either on Token or Doc) that is
used to key the returned scores
Naming differences:
* `uas`, `las`, and `las_per_type` in the scores dict are renamed to
`dep_uas`, `dep_las`, and `dep_las_per_type`
Scoring differences:
* `Doc.sents` is now scored as spans rather than on sentence-initial
token positions so that `Doc.sents` and `Doc.ents` can be scored with
the same method (this lowers scores since a single incorrect sentence
start results in two incorrect spans)
* Simplify / extend hasattr check for eval method
* Add hasattr check to tokenizer scoring
* Simplify to hasattr check for component scoring
* Reset Example alignment if docs are set
Reset the Example alignment if either doc is set in case the
tokenization has changed.
* Add PRF tokenization scoring for tokens as spans
Add PRF scores for tokens as character spans. The scores are:
* token_acc: # correct tokens / # gold tokens
* token_p/r/f: PRF for (token.idx, token.idx + len(token))
* Add docstring to Scorer.score_tokenization
* Rename component.evaluate() to component.score()
* Update Scorer API docs
* Update scoring for positive_label in textcat
* Fix TextCategorizer.score kwargs
* Update Language.evaluate docs
* Update score names in default config
2020-07-25 13:53:02 +03:00
The returned `Dict` contains the scores provided by the individual pipeline
2021-10-29 11:29:29 +03:00
components. For the scoring methods provided by the `Scorer` and used by the
core pipeline components, the individual score names start with the `Token` or
`Doc` attribute being scored:
2020-07-28 22:39:42 +03:00
2021-10-29 11:29:29 +03:00
- `token_acc` , `token_p` , `token_r` , `token_f`
2020-07-28 22:39:42 +03:00
- `sents_p` , `sents_r` , `sents_f`
2021-10-29 11:29:29 +03:00
- `tag_acc`
- `pos_acc`
- `morph_acc` , `morph_micro_p` , `morph_micro_r` , `morph_micro_f` ,
`morph_per_feat`
- `lemma_acc`
2020-07-28 22:39:42 +03:00
- `dep_uas` , `dep_las` , `dep_las_per_type`
- `ents_p` , `ents_r` `ents_f` , `ents_per_type`
2021-10-29 11:29:29 +03:00
- `spans_sc_p` , `spans_sc_r` , `spans_sc_f`
2021-06-14 13:19:36 +03:00
- `cats_score` (depends on config, description provided in `cats_score_desc` ),
`cats_micro_p` , `cats_micro_r` , `cats_micro_f` , `cats_macro_p` ,
`cats_macro_r` , `cats_macro_f` , `cats_macro_auc` , `cats_f_per_type` ,
`cats_auc_per_type`
2020-07-27 16:34:42 +03:00
2019-05-24 15:06:04 +03:00
> #### Example
>
> ```python
> scorer = Scorer()
2020-07-28 22:39:42 +03:00
> scores = scorer.score(examples)
2019-05-24 15:06:04 +03:00
> ```
2020-08-17 17:45:24 +03:00
| Name | Description |
| ----------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| `examples` | The `Example` objects holding both the predictions and the correct gold-standard annotations. ~~Iterable[Example]~~ |
| **RETURNS** | A dictionary of scores. ~~Dict[str, Union[float, Dict[str, float]]]~~ |
2020-07-27 16:34:42 +03:00
2020-07-28 22:39:42 +03:00
## Scorer.score_tokenization {#score_tokenization tag="staticmethod" new="3"}
Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility (#5731)
* Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility
Refactor the `Scorer` to improve flexibility for arbitrary pipeline
components.
* Individual pipeline components provide their own `evaluate` methods
that score a list of `Example`s and return a dictionary of scores
* `Scorer` is initialized either:
* with a provided pipeline containing components to be scored
* with a default pipeline containing the built-in statistical
components (senter, tagger, morphologizer, parser, ner)
* `Scorer.score` evaluates a list of `Example`s and returns a dictionary
of scores referring to the scores provided by the components in the
pipeline
Significant differences:
* `tags_acc` is renamed to `tag_acc` to be consistent with `token_acc`
and the new `morph_acc`, `pos_acc`, and `lemma_acc`
* Scoring is no longer cumulative: `Scorer.score` scores a list of
examples rather than a single example and does not retain any state
about previously scored examples
* PRF values in the returned scores are no longer multiplied by 100
* Add kwargs to Morphologizer.evaluate
* Create generalized scoring methods in Scorer
* Generalized static scoring methods are added to `Scorer`
* Methods require an attribute (either on Token or Doc) that is
used to key the returned scores
Naming differences:
* `uas`, `las`, and `las_per_type` in the scores dict are renamed to
`dep_uas`, `dep_las`, and `dep_las_per_type`
Scoring differences:
* `Doc.sents` is now scored as spans rather than on sentence-initial
token positions so that `Doc.sents` and `Doc.ents` can be scored with
the same method (this lowers scores since a single incorrect sentence
start results in two incorrect spans)
* Simplify / extend hasattr check for eval method
* Add hasattr check to tokenizer scoring
* Simplify to hasattr check for component scoring
* Reset Example alignment if docs are set
Reset the Example alignment if either doc is set in case the
tokenization has changed.
* Add PRF tokenization scoring for tokens as spans
Add PRF scores for tokens as character spans. The scores are:
* token_acc: # correct tokens / # gold tokens
* token_p/r/f: PRF for (token.idx, token.idx + len(token))
* Add docstring to Scorer.score_tokenization
* Rename component.evaluate() to component.score()
* Update Scorer API docs
* Update scoring for positive_label in textcat
* Fix TextCategorizer.score kwargs
* Update Language.evaluate docs
* Update score names in default config
2020-07-25 13:53:02 +03:00
Scores the tokenization:
2023-01-11 10:01:47 +03:00
- `token_acc` : number of correct tokens / number of predicted tokens
2020-07-28 22:39:42 +03:00
- `token_p` , `token_r` , `token_f` : precision, recall and F-score for token
character spans
2020-11-03 17:47:18 +03:00
Docs with `has_unknown_spaces` are skipped during scoring.
2020-07-28 22:39:42 +03:00
> #### Example
>
> ```python
> scores = Scorer.score_tokenization(examples)
> ```
Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility (#5731)
* Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility
Refactor the `Scorer` to improve flexibility for arbitrary pipeline
components.
* Individual pipeline components provide their own `evaluate` methods
that score a list of `Example`s and return a dictionary of scores
* `Scorer` is initialized either:
* with a provided pipeline containing components to be scored
* with a default pipeline containing the built-in statistical
components (senter, tagger, morphologizer, parser, ner)
* `Scorer.score` evaluates a list of `Example`s and returns a dictionary
of scores referring to the scores provided by the components in the
pipeline
Significant differences:
* `tags_acc` is renamed to `tag_acc` to be consistent with `token_acc`
and the new `morph_acc`, `pos_acc`, and `lemma_acc`
* Scoring is no longer cumulative: `Scorer.score` scores a list of
examples rather than a single example and does not retain any state
about previously scored examples
* PRF values in the returned scores are no longer multiplied by 100
* Add kwargs to Morphologizer.evaluate
* Create generalized scoring methods in Scorer
* Generalized static scoring methods are added to `Scorer`
* Methods require an attribute (either on Token or Doc) that is
used to key the returned scores
Naming differences:
* `uas`, `las`, and `las_per_type` in the scores dict are renamed to
`dep_uas`, `dep_las`, and `dep_las_per_type`
Scoring differences:
* `Doc.sents` is now scored as spans rather than on sentence-initial
token positions so that `Doc.sents` and `Doc.ents` can be scored with
the same method (this lowers scores since a single incorrect sentence
start results in two incorrect spans)
* Simplify / extend hasattr check for eval method
* Add hasattr check to tokenizer scoring
* Simplify to hasattr check for component scoring
* Reset Example alignment if docs are set
Reset the Example alignment if either doc is set in case the
tokenization has changed.
* Add PRF tokenization scoring for tokens as spans
Add PRF scores for tokens as character spans. The scores are:
* token_acc: # correct tokens / # gold tokens
* token_p/r/f: PRF for (token.idx, token.idx + len(token))
* Add docstring to Scorer.score_tokenization
* Rename component.evaluate() to component.score()
* Update Scorer API docs
* Update scoring for positive_label in textcat
* Fix TextCategorizer.score kwargs
* Update Language.evaluate docs
* Update score names in default config
2020-07-25 13:53:02 +03:00
2020-08-17 17:45:24 +03:00
| Name | Description |
2021-10-29 11:29:29 +03:00
| ----------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
2020-08-17 17:45:24 +03:00
| `examples` | The `Example` objects holding both the predictions and the correct gold-standard annotations. ~~Iterable[Example]~~ |
| **RETURNS** | `Dict` | A dictionary containing the scores `token_acc` , `token_p` , `token_r` , `token_f` . ~~Dict[str, float]]~~ |
Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility (#5731)
* Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility
Refactor the `Scorer` to improve flexibility for arbitrary pipeline
components.
* Individual pipeline components provide their own `evaluate` methods
that score a list of `Example`s and return a dictionary of scores
* `Scorer` is initialized either:
* with a provided pipeline containing components to be scored
* with a default pipeline containing the built-in statistical
components (senter, tagger, morphologizer, parser, ner)
* `Scorer.score` evaluates a list of `Example`s and returns a dictionary
of scores referring to the scores provided by the components in the
pipeline
Significant differences:
* `tags_acc` is renamed to `tag_acc` to be consistent with `token_acc`
and the new `morph_acc`, `pos_acc`, and `lemma_acc`
* Scoring is no longer cumulative: `Scorer.score` scores a list of
examples rather than a single example and does not retain any state
about previously scored examples
* PRF values in the returned scores are no longer multiplied by 100
* Add kwargs to Morphologizer.evaluate
* Create generalized scoring methods in Scorer
* Generalized static scoring methods are added to `Scorer`
* Methods require an attribute (either on Token or Doc) that is
used to key the returned scores
Naming differences:
* `uas`, `las`, and `las_per_type` in the scores dict are renamed to
`dep_uas`, `dep_las`, and `dep_las_per_type`
Scoring differences:
* `Doc.sents` is now scored as spans rather than on sentence-initial
token positions so that `Doc.sents` and `Doc.ents` can be scored with
the same method (this lowers scores since a single incorrect sentence
start results in two incorrect spans)
* Simplify / extend hasattr check for eval method
* Add hasattr check to tokenizer scoring
* Simplify to hasattr check for component scoring
* Reset Example alignment if docs are set
Reset the Example alignment if either doc is set in case the
tokenization has changed.
* Add PRF tokenization scoring for tokens as spans
Add PRF scores for tokens as character spans. The scores are:
* token_acc: # correct tokens / # gold tokens
* token_p/r/f: PRF for (token.idx, token.idx + len(token))
* Add docstring to Scorer.score_tokenization
* Rename component.evaluate() to component.score()
* Update Scorer API docs
* Update scoring for positive_label in textcat
* Fix TextCategorizer.score kwargs
* Update Language.evaluate docs
* Update score names in default config
2020-07-25 13:53:02 +03:00
2020-07-28 22:39:42 +03:00
## Scorer.score_token_attr {#score_token_attr tag="staticmethod" new="3"}
Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility (#5731)
* Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility
Refactor the `Scorer` to improve flexibility for arbitrary pipeline
components.
* Individual pipeline components provide their own `evaluate` methods
that score a list of `Example`s and return a dictionary of scores
* `Scorer` is initialized either:
* with a provided pipeline containing components to be scored
* with a default pipeline containing the built-in statistical
components (senter, tagger, morphologizer, parser, ner)
* `Scorer.score` evaluates a list of `Example`s and returns a dictionary
of scores referring to the scores provided by the components in the
pipeline
Significant differences:
* `tags_acc` is renamed to `tag_acc` to be consistent with `token_acc`
and the new `morph_acc`, `pos_acc`, and `lemma_acc`
* Scoring is no longer cumulative: `Scorer.score` scores a list of
examples rather than a single example and does not retain any state
about previously scored examples
* PRF values in the returned scores are no longer multiplied by 100
* Add kwargs to Morphologizer.evaluate
* Create generalized scoring methods in Scorer
* Generalized static scoring methods are added to `Scorer`
* Methods require an attribute (either on Token or Doc) that is
used to key the returned scores
Naming differences:
* `uas`, `las`, and `las_per_type` in the scores dict are renamed to
`dep_uas`, `dep_las`, and `dep_las_per_type`
Scoring differences:
* `Doc.sents` is now scored as spans rather than on sentence-initial
token positions so that `Doc.sents` and `Doc.ents` can be scored with
the same method (this lowers scores since a single incorrect sentence
start results in two incorrect spans)
* Simplify / extend hasattr check for eval method
* Add hasattr check to tokenizer scoring
* Simplify to hasattr check for component scoring
* Reset Example alignment if docs are set
Reset the Example alignment if either doc is set in case the
tokenization has changed.
* Add PRF tokenization scoring for tokens as spans
Add PRF scores for tokens as character spans. The scores are:
* token_acc: # correct tokens / # gold tokens
* token_p/r/f: PRF for (token.idx, token.idx + len(token))
* Add docstring to Scorer.score_tokenization
* Rename component.evaluate() to component.score()
* Update Scorer API docs
* Update scoring for positive_label in textcat
* Fix TextCategorizer.score kwargs
* Update Language.evaluate docs
* Update score names in default config
2020-07-25 13:53:02 +03:00
2020-11-03 17:47:18 +03:00
Scores a single token attribute. Tokens with missing values in the reference doc
are skipped during scoring.
Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility (#5731)
* Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility
Refactor the `Scorer` to improve flexibility for arbitrary pipeline
components.
* Individual pipeline components provide their own `evaluate` methods
that score a list of `Example`s and return a dictionary of scores
* `Scorer` is initialized either:
* with a provided pipeline containing components to be scored
* with a default pipeline containing the built-in statistical
components (senter, tagger, morphologizer, parser, ner)
* `Scorer.score` evaluates a list of `Example`s and returns a dictionary
of scores referring to the scores provided by the components in the
pipeline
Significant differences:
* `tags_acc` is renamed to `tag_acc` to be consistent with `token_acc`
and the new `morph_acc`, `pos_acc`, and `lemma_acc`
* Scoring is no longer cumulative: `Scorer.score` scores a list of
examples rather than a single example and does not retain any state
about previously scored examples
* PRF values in the returned scores are no longer multiplied by 100
* Add kwargs to Morphologizer.evaluate
* Create generalized scoring methods in Scorer
* Generalized static scoring methods are added to `Scorer`
* Methods require an attribute (either on Token or Doc) that is
used to key the returned scores
Naming differences:
* `uas`, `las`, and `las_per_type` in the scores dict are renamed to
`dep_uas`, `dep_las`, and `dep_las_per_type`
Scoring differences:
* `Doc.sents` is now scored as spans rather than on sentence-initial
token positions so that `Doc.sents` and `Doc.ents` can be scored with
the same method (this lowers scores since a single incorrect sentence
start results in two incorrect spans)
* Simplify / extend hasattr check for eval method
* Add hasattr check to tokenizer scoring
* Simplify to hasattr check for component scoring
* Reset Example alignment if docs are set
Reset the Example alignment if either doc is set in case the
tokenization has changed.
* Add PRF tokenization scoring for tokens as spans
Add PRF scores for tokens as character spans. The scores are:
* token_acc: # correct tokens / # gold tokens
* token_p/r/f: PRF for (token.idx, token.idx + len(token))
* Add docstring to Scorer.score_tokenization
* Rename component.evaluate() to component.score()
* Update Scorer API docs
* Update scoring for positive_label in textcat
* Fix TextCategorizer.score kwargs
* Update Language.evaluate docs
* Update score names in default config
2020-07-25 13:53:02 +03:00
2020-07-28 22:39:42 +03:00
> #### Example
>
> ```python
> scores = Scorer.score_token_attr(examples, "pos")
> print(scores["pos_acc"])
> ```
2020-11-03 17:47:18 +03:00
| Name | Description |
| ---------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| `examples` | The `Example` objects holding both the predictions and the correct gold-standard annotations. ~~Iterable[Example]~~ |
| `attr` | The attribute to score. ~~str~~ |
| _keyword-only_ | |
| `getter` | Defaults to `getattr` . If provided, `getter(token, attr)` should return the value of the attribute for an individual `Token` . ~~Callable[[Token, str], Any]~~ |
| `missing_values` | Attribute values to treat as missing annotation in the reference annotation. Defaults to `{0, None, ""}` . ~~Set[Any]~~ |
| **RETURNS** | A dictionary containing the score `{attr}_acc` . ~~Dict[str, float]~~ |
Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility (#5731)
* Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility
Refactor the `Scorer` to improve flexibility for arbitrary pipeline
components.
* Individual pipeline components provide their own `evaluate` methods
that score a list of `Example`s and return a dictionary of scores
* `Scorer` is initialized either:
* with a provided pipeline containing components to be scored
* with a default pipeline containing the built-in statistical
components (senter, tagger, morphologizer, parser, ner)
* `Scorer.score` evaluates a list of `Example`s and returns a dictionary
of scores referring to the scores provided by the components in the
pipeline
Significant differences:
* `tags_acc` is renamed to `tag_acc` to be consistent with `token_acc`
and the new `morph_acc`, `pos_acc`, and `lemma_acc`
* Scoring is no longer cumulative: `Scorer.score` scores a list of
examples rather than a single example and does not retain any state
about previously scored examples
* PRF values in the returned scores are no longer multiplied by 100
* Add kwargs to Morphologizer.evaluate
* Create generalized scoring methods in Scorer
* Generalized static scoring methods are added to `Scorer`
* Methods require an attribute (either on Token or Doc) that is
used to key the returned scores
Naming differences:
* `uas`, `las`, and `las_per_type` in the scores dict are renamed to
`dep_uas`, `dep_las`, and `dep_las_per_type`
Scoring differences:
* `Doc.sents` is now scored as spans rather than on sentence-initial
token positions so that `Doc.sents` and `Doc.ents` can be scored with
the same method (this lowers scores since a single incorrect sentence
start results in two incorrect spans)
* Simplify / extend hasattr check for eval method
* Add hasattr check to tokenizer scoring
* Simplify to hasattr check for component scoring
* Reset Example alignment if docs are set
Reset the Example alignment if either doc is set in case the
tokenization has changed.
* Add PRF tokenization scoring for tokens as spans
Add PRF scores for tokens as character spans. The scores are:
* token_acc: # correct tokens / # gold tokens
* token_p/r/f: PRF for (token.idx, token.idx + len(token))
* Add docstring to Scorer.score_tokenization
* Rename component.evaluate() to component.score()
* Update Scorer API docs
* Update scoring for positive_label in textcat
* Fix TextCategorizer.score kwargs
* Update Language.evaluate docs
* Update score names in default config
2020-07-25 13:53:02 +03:00
2020-07-28 22:39:42 +03:00
## Scorer.score_token_attr_per_feat {#score_token_attr_per_feat tag="staticmethod" new="3"}
Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility (#5731)
* Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility
Refactor the `Scorer` to improve flexibility for arbitrary pipeline
components.
* Individual pipeline components provide their own `evaluate` methods
that score a list of `Example`s and return a dictionary of scores
* `Scorer` is initialized either:
* with a provided pipeline containing components to be scored
* with a default pipeline containing the built-in statistical
components (senter, tagger, morphologizer, parser, ner)
* `Scorer.score` evaluates a list of `Example`s and returns a dictionary
of scores referring to the scores provided by the components in the
pipeline
Significant differences:
* `tags_acc` is renamed to `tag_acc` to be consistent with `token_acc`
and the new `morph_acc`, `pos_acc`, and `lemma_acc`
* Scoring is no longer cumulative: `Scorer.score` scores a list of
examples rather than a single example and does not retain any state
about previously scored examples
* PRF values in the returned scores are no longer multiplied by 100
* Add kwargs to Morphologizer.evaluate
* Create generalized scoring methods in Scorer
* Generalized static scoring methods are added to `Scorer`
* Methods require an attribute (either on Token or Doc) that is
used to key the returned scores
Naming differences:
* `uas`, `las`, and `las_per_type` in the scores dict are renamed to
`dep_uas`, `dep_las`, and `dep_las_per_type`
Scoring differences:
* `Doc.sents` is now scored as spans rather than on sentence-initial
token positions so that `Doc.sents` and `Doc.ents` can be scored with
the same method (this lowers scores since a single incorrect sentence
start results in two incorrect spans)
* Simplify / extend hasattr check for eval method
* Add hasattr check to tokenizer scoring
* Simplify to hasattr check for component scoring
* Reset Example alignment if docs are set
Reset the Example alignment if either doc is set in case the
tokenization has changed.
* Add PRF tokenization scoring for tokens as spans
Add PRF scores for tokens as character spans. The scores are:
* token_acc: # correct tokens / # gold tokens
* token_p/r/f: PRF for (token.idx, token.idx + len(token))
* Add docstring to Scorer.score_tokenization
* Rename component.evaluate() to component.score()
* Update Scorer API docs
* Update scoring for positive_label in textcat
* Fix TextCategorizer.score kwargs
* Update Language.evaluate docs
* Update score names in default config
2020-07-25 13:53:02 +03:00
2020-08-17 17:45:24 +03:00
Scores a single token attribute per feature for a token attribute in the
Universal Dependencies
[FEATS ](https://universaldependencies.org/format.html#morphological-annotation )
2020-11-03 17:47:18 +03:00
format. Tokens with missing values in the reference doc are skipped during
scoring.
Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility (#5731)
* Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility
Refactor the `Scorer` to improve flexibility for arbitrary pipeline
components.
* Individual pipeline components provide their own `evaluate` methods
that score a list of `Example`s and return a dictionary of scores
* `Scorer` is initialized either:
* with a provided pipeline containing components to be scored
* with a default pipeline containing the built-in statistical
components (senter, tagger, morphologizer, parser, ner)
* `Scorer.score` evaluates a list of `Example`s and returns a dictionary
of scores referring to the scores provided by the components in the
pipeline
Significant differences:
* `tags_acc` is renamed to `tag_acc` to be consistent with `token_acc`
and the new `morph_acc`, `pos_acc`, and `lemma_acc`
* Scoring is no longer cumulative: `Scorer.score` scores a list of
examples rather than a single example and does not retain any state
about previously scored examples
* PRF values in the returned scores are no longer multiplied by 100
* Add kwargs to Morphologizer.evaluate
* Create generalized scoring methods in Scorer
* Generalized static scoring methods are added to `Scorer`
* Methods require an attribute (either on Token or Doc) that is
used to key the returned scores
Naming differences:
* `uas`, `las`, and `las_per_type` in the scores dict are renamed to
`dep_uas`, `dep_las`, and `dep_las_per_type`
Scoring differences:
* `Doc.sents` is now scored as spans rather than on sentence-initial
token positions so that `Doc.sents` and `Doc.ents` can be scored with
the same method (this lowers scores since a single incorrect sentence
start results in two incorrect spans)
* Simplify / extend hasattr check for eval method
* Add hasattr check to tokenizer scoring
* Simplify to hasattr check for component scoring
* Reset Example alignment if docs are set
Reset the Example alignment if either doc is set in case the
tokenization has changed.
* Add PRF tokenization scoring for tokens as spans
Add PRF scores for tokens as character spans. The scores are:
* token_acc: # correct tokens / # gold tokens
* token_p/r/f: PRF for (token.idx, token.idx + len(token))
* Add docstring to Scorer.score_tokenization
* Rename component.evaluate() to component.score()
* Update Scorer API docs
* Update scoring for positive_label in textcat
* Fix TextCategorizer.score kwargs
* Update Language.evaluate docs
* Update score names in default config
2020-07-25 13:53:02 +03:00
2020-07-28 22:39:42 +03:00
> #### Example
>
> ```python
> scores = Scorer.score_token_attr_per_feat(examples, "morph")
> print(scores["morph_per_feat"])
> ```
Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility (#5731)
* Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility
Refactor the `Scorer` to improve flexibility for arbitrary pipeline
components.
* Individual pipeline components provide their own `evaluate` methods
that score a list of `Example`s and return a dictionary of scores
* `Scorer` is initialized either:
* with a provided pipeline containing components to be scored
* with a default pipeline containing the built-in statistical
components (senter, tagger, morphologizer, parser, ner)
* `Scorer.score` evaluates a list of `Example`s and returns a dictionary
of scores referring to the scores provided by the components in the
pipeline
Significant differences:
* `tags_acc` is renamed to `tag_acc` to be consistent with `token_acc`
and the new `morph_acc`, `pos_acc`, and `lemma_acc`
* Scoring is no longer cumulative: `Scorer.score` scores a list of
examples rather than a single example and does not retain any state
about previously scored examples
* PRF values in the returned scores are no longer multiplied by 100
* Add kwargs to Morphologizer.evaluate
* Create generalized scoring methods in Scorer
* Generalized static scoring methods are added to `Scorer`
* Methods require an attribute (either on Token or Doc) that is
used to key the returned scores
Naming differences:
* `uas`, `las`, and `las_per_type` in the scores dict are renamed to
`dep_uas`, `dep_las`, and `dep_las_per_type`
Scoring differences:
* `Doc.sents` is now scored as spans rather than on sentence-initial
token positions so that `Doc.sents` and `Doc.ents` can be scored with
the same method (this lowers scores since a single incorrect sentence
start results in two incorrect spans)
* Simplify / extend hasattr check for eval method
* Add hasattr check to tokenizer scoring
* Simplify to hasattr check for component scoring
* Reset Example alignment if docs are set
Reset the Example alignment if either doc is set in case the
tokenization has changed.
* Add PRF tokenization scoring for tokens as spans
Add PRF scores for tokens as character spans. The scores are:
* token_acc: # correct tokens / # gold tokens
* token_p/r/f: PRF for (token.idx, token.idx + len(token))
* Add docstring to Scorer.score_tokenization
* Rename component.evaluate() to component.score()
* Update Scorer API docs
* Update scoring for positive_label in textcat
* Fix TextCategorizer.score kwargs
* Update Language.evaluate docs
* Update score names in default config
2020-07-25 13:53:02 +03:00
2021-10-29 11:29:29 +03:00
| Name | Description |
| ---------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| `examples` | The `Example` objects holding both the predictions and the correct gold-standard annotations. ~~Iterable[Example]~~ |
| `attr` | The attribute to score. ~~str~~ |
| _keyword-only_ | |
| `getter` | Defaults to `getattr` . If provided, `getter(token, attr)` should return the value of the attribute for an individual `Token` . ~~Callable[[Token, str], Any]~~ |
| `missing_values` | Attribute values to treat as missing annotation in the reference annotation. Defaults to `{0, None, ""}` . ~~Set[Any]~~ |
| **RETURNS** | A dictionary containing the micro PRF scores under the key `{attr}_micro_p/r/f` and the per-feature PRF scores under `{attr}_per_feat` . ~~Dict[str, Dict[str, float]]~~ |
2020-07-28 22:39:42 +03:00
## Scorer.score_spans {#score_spans tag="staticmethod" new="3"}
Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility (#5731)
* Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility
Refactor the `Scorer` to improve flexibility for arbitrary pipeline
components.
* Individual pipeline components provide their own `evaluate` methods
that score a list of `Example`s and return a dictionary of scores
* `Scorer` is initialized either:
* with a provided pipeline containing components to be scored
* with a default pipeline containing the built-in statistical
components (senter, tagger, morphologizer, parser, ner)
* `Scorer.score` evaluates a list of `Example`s and returns a dictionary
of scores referring to the scores provided by the components in the
pipeline
Significant differences:
* `tags_acc` is renamed to `tag_acc` to be consistent with `token_acc`
and the new `morph_acc`, `pos_acc`, and `lemma_acc`
* Scoring is no longer cumulative: `Scorer.score` scores a list of
examples rather than a single example and does not retain any state
about previously scored examples
* PRF values in the returned scores are no longer multiplied by 100
* Add kwargs to Morphologizer.evaluate
* Create generalized scoring methods in Scorer
* Generalized static scoring methods are added to `Scorer`
* Methods require an attribute (either on Token or Doc) that is
used to key the returned scores
Naming differences:
* `uas`, `las`, and `las_per_type` in the scores dict are renamed to
`dep_uas`, `dep_las`, and `dep_las_per_type`
Scoring differences:
* `Doc.sents` is now scored as spans rather than on sentence-initial
token positions so that `Doc.sents` and `Doc.ents` can be scored with
the same method (this lowers scores since a single incorrect sentence
start results in two incorrect spans)
* Simplify / extend hasattr check for eval method
* Add hasattr check to tokenizer scoring
* Simplify to hasattr check for component scoring
* Reset Example alignment if docs are set
Reset the Example alignment if either doc is set in case the
tokenization has changed.
* Add PRF tokenization scoring for tokens as spans
Add PRF scores for tokens as character spans. The scores are:
* token_acc: # correct tokens / # gold tokens
* token_p/r/f: PRF for (token.idx, token.idx + len(token))
* Add docstring to Scorer.score_tokenization
* Rename component.evaluate() to component.score()
* Update Scorer API docs
* Update scoring for positive_label in textcat
* Fix TextCategorizer.score kwargs
* Update Language.evaluate docs
* Update score names in default config
2020-07-25 13:53:02 +03:00
Returns PRF scores for labeled or unlabeled spans.
2020-07-28 22:39:42 +03:00
> #### Example
>
> ```python
> scores = Scorer.score_spans(examples, "ents")
> print(scores["ents_f"])
> ```
Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility (#5731)
* Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility
Refactor the `Scorer` to improve flexibility for arbitrary pipeline
components.
* Individual pipeline components provide their own `evaluate` methods
that score a list of `Example`s and return a dictionary of scores
* `Scorer` is initialized either:
* with a provided pipeline containing components to be scored
* with a default pipeline containing the built-in statistical
components (senter, tagger, morphologizer, parser, ner)
* `Scorer.score` evaluates a list of `Example`s and returns a dictionary
of scores referring to the scores provided by the components in the
pipeline
Significant differences:
* `tags_acc` is renamed to `tag_acc` to be consistent with `token_acc`
and the new `morph_acc`, `pos_acc`, and `lemma_acc`
* Scoring is no longer cumulative: `Scorer.score` scores a list of
examples rather than a single example and does not retain any state
about previously scored examples
* PRF values in the returned scores are no longer multiplied by 100
* Add kwargs to Morphologizer.evaluate
* Create generalized scoring methods in Scorer
* Generalized static scoring methods are added to `Scorer`
* Methods require an attribute (either on Token or Doc) that is
used to key the returned scores
Naming differences:
* `uas`, `las`, and `las_per_type` in the scores dict are renamed to
`dep_uas`, `dep_las`, and `dep_las_per_type`
Scoring differences:
* `Doc.sents` is now scored as spans rather than on sentence-initial
token positions so that `Doc.sents` and `Doc.ents` can be scored with
the same method (this lowers scores since a single incorrect sentence
start results in two incorrect spans)
* Simplify / extend hasattr check for eval method
* Add hasattr check to tokenizer scoring
* Simplify to hasattr check for component scoring
* Reset Example alignment if docs are set
Reset the Example alignment if either doc is set in case the
tokenization has changed.
* Add PRF tokenization scoring for tokens as spans
Add PRF scores for tokens as character spans. The scores are:
* token_acc: # correct tokens / # gold tokens
* token_p/r/f: PRF for (token.idx, token.idx + len(token))
* Add docstring to Scorer.score_tokenization
* Rename component.evaluate() to component.score()
* Update Scorer API docs
* Update scoring for positive_label in textcat
* Fix TextCategorizer.score kwargs
* Update Language.evaluate docs
* Update score names in default config
2020-07-25 13:53:02 +03:00
2021-04-08 13:19:17 +03:00
| Name | Description |
| ---------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| `examples` | The `Example` objects holding both the predictions and the correct gold-standard annotations. ~~Iterable[Example]~~ |
| `attr` | The attribute to score. ~~str~~ |
| _keyword-only_ | |
| `getter` | Defaults to `getattr` . If provided, `getter(doc, attr)` should return the `Span` objects for an individual `Doc` . ~~Callable[[Doc, str], Iterable[Span]]~~ |
| `has_annotation` | Defaults to `None` . If provided, `has_annotation(doc)` should return whether a `Doc` has annotation for this `attr` . Docs without annotation are skipped for scoring purposes. ~~str~~ |
| `labeled` | Defaults to `True` . If set to `False` , two spans will be considered equal if their start and end match, irrespective of their label. ~~bool~~ |
| `allow_overlap` | Defaults to `False` . Whether or not to allow overlapping spans. If set to `False` , the alignment will automatically resolve conflicts. ~~bool~~ |
| **RETURNS** | A dictionary containing the PRF scores under the keys `{attr}_p` , `{attr}_r` , `{attr}_f` and the per-type PRF scores under `{attr}_per_type` . ~~Dict[str, Union[float, Dict[str, float]]]~~ |
2020-07-28 22:39:42 +03:00
## Scorer.score_deps {#score_deps tag="staticmethod" new="3"}
Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility (#5731)
* Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility
Refactor the `Scorer` to improve flexibility for arbitrary pipeline
components.
* Individual pipeline components provide their own `evaluate` methods
that score a list of `Example`s and return a dictionary of scores
* `Scorer` is initialized either:
* with a provided pipeline containing components to be scored
* with a default pipeline containing the built-in statistical
components (senter, tagger, morphologizer, parser, ner)
* `Scorer.score` evaluates a list of `Example`s and returns a dictionary
of scores referring to the scores provided by the components in the
pipeline
Significant differences:
* `tags_acc` is renamed to `tag_acc` to be consistent with `token_acc`
and the new `morph_acc`, `pos_acc`, and `lemma_acc`
* Scoring is no longer cumulative: `Scorer.score` scores a list of
examples rather than a single example and does not retain any state
about previously scored examples
* PRF values in the returned scores are no longer multiplied by 100
* Add kwargs to Morphologizer.evaluate
* Create generalized scoring methods in Scorer
* Generalized static scoring methods are added to `Scorer`
* Methods require an attribute (either on Token or Doc) that is
used to key the returned scores
Naming differences:
* `uas`, `las`, and `las_per_type` in the scores dict are renamed to
`dep_uas`, `dep_las`, and `dep_las_per_type`
Scoring differences:
* `Doc.sents` is now scored as spans rather than on sentence-initial
token positions so that `Doc.sents` and `Doc.ents` can be scored with
the same method (this lowers scores since a single incorrect sentence
start results in two incorrect spans)
* Simplify / extend hasattr check for eval method
* Add hasattr check to tokenizer scoring
* Simplify to hasattr check for component scoring
* Reset Example alignment if docs are set
Reset the Example alignment if either doc is set in case the
tokenization has changed.
* Add PRF tokenization scoring for tokens as spans
Add PRF scores for tokens as character spans. The scores are:
* token_acc: # correct tokens / # gold tokens
* token_p/r/f: PRF for (token.idx, token.idx + len(token))
* Add docstring to Scorer.score_tokenization
* Rename component.evaluate() to component.score()
* Update Scorer API docs
* Update scoring for positive_label in textcat
* Fix TextCategorizer.score kwargs
* Update Language.evaluate docs
* Update score names in default config
2020-07-25 13:53:02 +03:00
2020-11-03 17:47:18 +03:00
Calculate the UAS, LAS, and LAS per type scores for dependency parses. Tokens
with missing values for the `attr` (typically `dep` ) are skipped during scoring.
Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility (#5731)
* Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility
Refactor the `Scorer` to improve flexibility for arbitrary pipeline
components.
* Individual pipeline components provide their own `evaluate` methods
that score a list of `Example`s and return a dictionary of scores
* `Scorer` is initialized either:
* with a provided pipeline containing components to be scored
* with a default pipeline containing the built-in statistical
components (senter, tagger, morphologizer, parser, ner)
* `Scorer.score` evaluates a list of `Example`s and returns a dictionary
of scores referring to the scores provided by the components in the
pipeline
Significant differences:
* `tags_acc` is renamed to `tag_acc` to be consistent with `token_acc`
and the new `morph_acc`, `pos_acc`, and `lemma_acc`
* Scoring is no longer cumulative: `Scorer.score` scores a list of
examples rather than a single example and does not retain any state
about previously scored examples
* PRF values in the returned scores are no longer multiplied by 100
* Add kwargs to Morphologizer.evaluate
* Create generalized scoring methods in Scorer
* Generalized static scoring methods are added to `Scorer`
* Methods require an attribute (either on Token or Doc) that is
used to key the returned scores
Naming differences:
* `uas`, `las`, and `las_per_type` in the scores dict are renamed to
`dep_uas`, `dep_las`, and `dep_las_per_type`
Scoring differences:
* `Doc.sents` is now scored as spans rather than on sentence-initial
token positions so that `Doc.sents` and `Doc.ents` can be scored with
the same method (this lowers scores since a single incorrect sentence
start results in two incorrect spans)
* Simplify / extend hasattr check for eval method
* Add hasattr check to tokenizer scoring
* Simplify to hasattr check for component scoring
* Reset Example alignment if docs are set
Reset the Example alignment if either doc is set in case the
tokenization has changed.
* Add PRF tokenization scoring for tokens as spans
Add PRF scores for tokens as character spans. The scores are:
* token_acc: # correct tokens / # gold tokens
* token_p/r/f: PRF for (token.idx, token.idx + len(token))
* Add docstring to Scorer.score_tokenization
* Rename component.evaluate() to component.score()
* Update Scorer API docs
* Update scoring for positive_label in textcat
* Fix TextCategorizer.score kwargs
* Update Language.evaluate docs
* Update score names in default config
2020-07-25 13:53:02 +03:00
2020-07-28 22:39:42 +03:00
> #### Example
>
> ```python
> def dep_getter(token, attr):
> dep = getattr(token, attr)
> dep = token.vocab.strings.as_string(dep).lower()
> return dep
>
> scores = Scorer.score_deps(
> examples,
> "dep",
> getter=dep_getter,
> ignore_labels=("p", "punct")
> )
> print(scores["dep_uas"], scores["dep_las"])
> ```
2020-11-03 17:47:18 +03:00
| Name | Description |
| ---------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| `examples` | The `Example` objects holding both the predictions and the correct gold-standard annotations. ~~Iterable[Example]~~ |
| `attr` | The attribute to score. ~~str~~ |
| _keyword-only_ | |
| `getter` | Defaults to `getattr` . If provided, `getter(token, attr)` should return the value of the attribute for an individual `Token` . ~~Callable[[Token, str], Any]~~ |
| `head_attr` | The attribute containing the head token. ~~str~~ |
| `head_getter` | Defaults to `getattr` . If provided, `head_getter(token, attr)` should return the head for an individual `Token` . ~~Callable[[Doc, str], Token]~~ |
| `ignore_labels` | Labels to ignore while scoring (e.g. `"punct"` ). ~~Iterable[str]~~ |
| `missing_values` | Attribute values to treat as missing annotation in the reference annotation. Defaults to `{0, None, ""}` . ~~Set[Any]~~ |
| **RETURNS** | A dictionary containing the scores: `{attr}_uas` , `{attr}_las` , and `{attr}_las_per_type` . ~~Dict[str, Union[float, Dict[str, float]]]~~ |
Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility (#5731)
* Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility
Refactor the `Scorer` to improve flexibility for arbitrary pipeline
components.
* Individual pipeline components provide their own `evaluate` methods
that score a list of `Example`s and return a dictionary of scores
* `Scorer` is initialized either:
* with a provided pipeline containing components to be scored
* with a default pipeline containing the built-in statistical
components (senter, tagger, morphologizer, parser, ner)
* `Scorer.score` evaluates a list of `Example`s and returns a dictionary
of scores referring to the scores provided by the components in the
pipeline
Significant differences:
* `tags_acc` is renamed to `tag_acc` to be consistent with `token_acc`
and the new `morph_acc`, `pos_acc`, and `lemma_acc`
* Scoring is no longer cumulative: `Scorer.score` scores a list of
examples rather than a single example and does not retain any state
about previously scored examples
* PRF values in the returned scores are no longer multiplied by 100
* Add kwargs to Morphologizer.evaluate
* Create generalized scoring methods in Scorer
* Generalized static scoring methods are added to `Scorer`
* Methods require an attribute (either on Token or Doc) that is
used to key the returned scores
Naming differences:
* `uas`, `las`, and `las_per_type` in the scores dict are renamed to
`dep_uas`, `dep_las`, and `dep_las_per_type`
Scoring differences:
* `Doc.sents` is now scored as spans rather than on sentence-initial
token positions so that `Doc.sents` and `Doc.ents` can be scored with
the same method (this lowers scores since a single incorrect sentence
start results in two incorrect spans)
* Simplify / extend hasattr check for eval method
* Add hasattr check to tokenizer scoring
* Simplify to hasattr check for component scoring
* Reset Example alignment if docs are set
Reset the Example alignment if either doc is set in case the
tokenization has changed.
* Add PRF tokenization scoring for tokens as spans
Add PRF scores for tokens as character spans. The scores are:
* token_acc: # correct tokens / # gold tokens
* token_p/r/f: PRF for (token.idx, token.idx + len(token))
* Add docstring to Scorer.score_tokenization
* Rename component.evaluate() to component.score()
* Update Scorer API docs
* Update scoring for positive_label in textcat
* Fix TextCategorizer.score kwargs
* Update Language.evaluate docs
* Update score names in default config
2020-07-25 13:53:02 +03:00
2020-07-28 22:39:42 +03:00
## Scorer.score_cats {#score_cats tag="staticmethod" new="3"}
Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility (#5731)
* Refactor the Scorer to improve flexibility
Refactor the `Scorer` to improve flexibility for arbitrary pipeline
components.
* Individual pipeline components provide their own `evaluate` methods
that score a list of `Example`s and return a dictionary of scores
* `Scorer` is initialized either:
* with a provided pipeline containing components to be scored
* with a default pipeline containing the built-in statistical
components (senter, tagger, morphologizer, parser, ner)
* `Scorer.score` evaluates a list of `Example`s and returns a dictionary
of scores referring to the scores provided by the components in the
pipeline
Significant differences:
* `tags_acc` is renamed to `tag_acc` to be consistent with `token_acc`
and the new `morph_acc`, `pos_acc`, and `lemma_acc`
* Scoring is no longer cumulative: `Scorer.score` scores a list of
examples rather than a single example and does not retain any state
about previously scored examples
* PRF values in the returned scores are no longer multiplied by 100
* Add kwargs to Morphologizer.evaluate
* Create generalized scoring methods in Scorer
* Generalized static scoring methods are added to `Scorer`
* Methods require an attribute (either on Token or Doc) that is
used to key the returned scores
Naming differences:
* `uas`, `las`, and `las_per_type` in the scores dict are renamed to
`dep_uas`, `dep_las`, and `dep_las_per_type`
Scoring differences:
* `Doc.sents` is now scored as spans rather than on sentence-initial
token positions so that `Doc.sents` and `Doc.ents` can be scored with
the same method (this lowers scores since a single incorrect sentence
start results in two incorrect spans)
* Simplify / extend hasattr check for eval method
* Add hasattr check to tokenizer scoring
* Simplify to hasattr check for component scoring
* Reset Example alignment if docs are set
Reset the Example alignment if either doc is set in case the
tokenization has changed.
* Add PRF tokenization scoring for tokens as spans
Add PRF scores for tokens as character spans. The scores are:
* token_acc: # correct tokens / # gold tokens
* token_p/r/f: PRF for (token.idx, token.idx + len(token))
* Add docstring to Scorer.score_tokenization
* Rename component.evaluate() to component.score()
* Update Scorer API docs
* Update scoring for positive_label in textcat
* Fix TextCategorizer.score kwargs
* Update Language.evaluate docs
* Update score names in default config
2020-07-25 13:53:02 +03:00
Calculate PRF and ROC AUC scores for a doc-level attribute that is a dict
2020-10-18 15:50:41 +03:00
containing scores for each label like `Doc.cats` . The returned dictionary
contains the following scores:
- `{attr}_micro_p` , `{attr}_micro_r` and `{attr}_micro_f` : each instance across
each label is weighted equally
- `{attr}_macro_p` , `{attr}_macro_r` and `{attr}_macro_f` : the average values
across evaluations per label
- `{attr}_f_per_type` and `{attr}_auc_per_type` : each contains a dictionary of
scores, keyed by label
- A final `{attr}_score` and corresponding `{attr}_score_desc` (text
description)
The reported `{attr}_score` depends on the classification properties:
- **binary exclusive with positive label:** `{attr}_score` is set to the F-score
of the positive label
- **3+ exclusive classes**, macro-averaged F-score:
`{attr}_score = {attr}_macro_f`
- **multilabel**, macro-averaged AUC: `{attr}_score = {attr}_macro_auc`
2020-07-28 22:39:42 +03:00
> #### Example
>
> ```python
> labels = ["LABEL_A", "LABEL_B", "LABEL_C"]
> scores = Scorer.score_cats(
> examples,
> "cats",
> labels=labels
> )
> print(scores["cats_macro_auc"])
> ```
2022-11-02 17:35:04 +03:00
| Name | Description |
| ---------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| `examples` | The `Example` objects holding both the predictions and the correct gold-standard annotations. ~~Iterable[Example]~~ |
| `attr` | The attribute to score. ~~str~~ |
| _keyword-only_ | |
| `getter` | Defaults to `getattr` . If provided, `getter(doc, attr)` should return the cats for an individual `Doc` . ~~Callable[[Doc, str], Dict[str, float]]~~ |
| labels | The set of possible labels. Defaults to `[]` . ~~Iterable[str]~~ |
| `multi_label` | Whether the attribute allows multiple labels. Defaults to `True` . When set to `False` (exclusive labels), missing gold labels are interpreted as `0.0` and the threshold is set to `0.0` . ~~bool~~ |
| `positive_label` | The positive label for a binary task with exclusive classes. Defaults to `None` . ~~Optional[str]~~ |
| `threshold` | Cutoff to consider a prediction "positive". Defaults to `0.5` for multi-label, and `0.0` (i.e. whatever's highest scoring) otherwise. ~~float~~ |
| **RETURNS** | A dictionary containing the scores, with inapplicable scores as `None` . ~~Dict[str, Optional[float]]~~ |
2020-09-24 17:53:59 +03:00
## Scorer.score_links {#score_links tag="staticmethod" new="3"}
Returns PRF for predicted links on the entity level. To disentangle the
performance of the NEL from the NER, this method only evaluates NEL links for
entities that overlap between the gold reference and the predictions.
> #### Example
>
> ```python
> scores = Scorer.score_links(
> examples,
> negative_labels=["NIL", ""]
> )
> print(scores["nel_micro_f"])
> ```
| Name | Description |
| ----------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| `examples` | The `Example` objects holding both the predictions and the correct gold-standard annotations. ~~Iterable[Example]~~ |
| _keyword-only_ | |
| `negative_labels` | The string values that refer to no annotation (e.g. "NIL"). ~~Iterable[str]~~ |
| **RETURNS** | A dictionary containing the scores. ~~Dict[str, Optional[float]]~~ |
2021-08-12 13:50:03 +03:00
## get_ner_prf {#get_ner_prf new="3"}
Compute micro-PRF and per-entity PRF scores.
| Name | Description |
| ---------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| `examples` | The `Example` objects holding both the predictions and the correct gold-standard annotations. ~~Iterable[Example]~~ |
2022-09-27 12:11:23 +03:00
## score_coref_clusters {#score_coref_clusters tag="experimental"}
Returns LEA ([Moosavi and Strube, 2016](https://aclanthology.org/P16-1060/)) PRF
scores for coreference clusters.
< Infobox title = "Important note" variant = "warning" >
Note this scoring function is not yet included in spaCy core - for details, see
the [CoreferenceResolver ](/api/coref ) docs.
< / Infobox >
> #### Example
>
> ```python
> scores = score_coref_clusters(
> examples,
> span_cluster_prefix="coref_clusters",
> )
> print(scores["coref_f"])
> ```
| Name | Description |
| --------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| `examples` | The `Example` objects holding both the predictions and the correct gold-standard annotations. ~~Iterable[Example]~~ |
| _keyword-only_ | |
| `span_cluster_prefix` | The prefix used for spans representing coreference clusters. ~~str~~ |
| **RETURNS** | A dictionary containing the scores. ~~Dict[str, Optional[float]]~~ |
## score_span_predictions {#score_span_predictions tag="experimental"}
Return accuracy for reconstructions of spans from single tokens. Only exactly
correct predictions are counted as correct, there is no partial credit for near
answers. Used by the [SpanResolver ](/api/span-resolver ).
< Infobox title = "Important note" variant = "warning" >
Note this scoring function is not yet included in spaCy core - for details, see
the [SpanResolver ](/api/span-resolver ) docs.
< / Infobox >
> #### Example
>
> ```python
> scores = score_span_predictions(
> examples,
> output_prefix="coref_clusters",
> )
> print(scores["span_coref_clusters_accuracy"])
> ```
| Name | Description |
| --------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| `examples` | The `Example` objects holding both the predictions and the correct gold-standard annotations. ~~Iterable[Example]~~ |
| _keyword-only_ | |
| `output_prefix` | The prefix used for spans representing the final predicted spans. ~~str~~ |
| **RETURNS** | A dictionary containing the scores. ~~Dict[str, Optional[float]]~~ |
