//- 💫 DOCS > API > ANNOTATION SPECS include ../../_includes/_mixins p This document describes the target annotations spaCy is trained to predict. +h(2, "tokenization") Tokenization p | Tokenization standards are based on the | #[+a("https://catalog.ldc.upenn.edu/LDC2013T19") OntoNotes 5] corpus. | The tokenizer differs from most by including tokens for significant | whitespace. Any sequence of whitespace characters beyond a single space | (#[code ' ']) is included as a token. +aside-code("Example"). from spacy.en import English nlp = English(parser=False) tokens = nlp('Some\nspaces and\ttab characters') print([t.orth_ for t in tokens]) # ['Some', '\n', 'spaces', ' ', 'and', '\t', 'tab', 'characters'] p | The whitespace tokens are useful for much the same reason punctuation is | – it's often an important delimiter in the text. By preserving it in the | token output, we are able to maintain a simple alignment between the | tokens and the original string, and we ensure that no information is | lost during processing. +h(2, "sentence-boundary") Sentence boundary detection p | Sentence boundaries are calculated from the syntactic parse tree, so | features such as punctuation and capitalisation play an important but | non-decisive role in determining the sentence boundaries. Usually this | means that the sentence boundaries will at least coincide with clause | boundaries, even given poorly punctuated text. +h(2, "pos-tagging") Part-of-speech Tagging include _annotation/_pos-tags +h(2, "lemmatization") Lemmatization p A "lemma" is the uninflected form of a word. In English, this means: +list +item #[strong Adjectives]: The form like "happy", not "happier" or "happiest" +item #[strong Adverbs]: The form like "badly", not "worse" or "worst" +item #[strong Nouns]: The form like "dog", not "dogs"; like "child", not "children" +item #[strong Verbs]: The form like "write", not "writes", "writing", "wrote" or "written" +aside("About spaCy's custom pronoun lemma") | Unlike verbs and common nouns, there's no clear base form of a personal | pronoun. Should the lemma of "me" be "I", or should we normalize person | as well, giving "it" — or maybe "he"? spaCy's solution is to introduce a | novel symbol, #[code.u-nowrap -PRON-], which is used as the lemma for | all personal pronouns. p | The lemmatization data is taken from | #[+a("https://wordnet.princeton.edu") WordNet]. However, we also add a | special case for pronouns: all pronouns are lemmatized to the special | token #[code -PRON-]. +h(2, "dependency-parsing") Syntactic Dependency Parsing +table(["Language", "Converter", "Scheme"]) +row +cell English +cell #[+a("http://www.clearnlp.com") ClearNLP] +cell #[+a("http://www.mathcs.emory.edu/~choi/doc/clear-dependency-2012.pdf") CLEAR Style] +row +cell German +cell #[+a("https://github.com/wbwseeker/tiger2dep") TIGER] +cell #[+a("http://www.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/forschung/ressourcen/korpora/TIGERCorpus/annotation/index.html") TIGER] +h(2, "named-entities") Named Entity Recognition include _annotation/_named-entities