spaCy/website/usage/_vectors-similarity/_basics.jade

140 lines
5.3 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

//- 💫 DOCS > USAGE > VECTORS & SIMILARITY > BASICS
+aside("Training word vectors")
| Dense, real valued vectors representing distributional similarity
| information are now a cornerstone of practical NLP. The most common way
| to train these vectors is the #[+a("https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Word2vec") word2vec]
| family of algorithms. The default
| #[+a("/models/en") English model] installs
| 300-dimensional vectors trained on the
| #[+a("http://commoncrawl.org") Common Crawl] corpus.
| If you need to train a word2vec model, we recommend the implementation in
| the Python library #[+a("https://radimrehurek.com/gensim/") Gensim].
include ../_spacy-101/_similarity
include ../_spacy-101/_word-vectors
+h(3, "in-context") Similarities in context
p
| Aside from spaCy's built-in word vectors, which were trained on a lot of
| text with a wide vocabulary, the parsing, tagging and NER models also
| rely on vector representations of the #[strong meanings of words in context].
| As the first component of the
| #[+a("/usage/processing-pipelines") processing pipeline], the
| tensorizer encodes a document's internal meaning representations as an
| array of floats, also called a tensor. This allows spaCy to make a
| reasonable guess at a word's meaning, based on its surrounding words.
| Even if a word hasn't been seen before, spaCy will know #[em something]
| about it. Because spaCy uses a 4-layer convolutional network, the
| tensors are sensitive to up to #[strong four words on either side] of a
| word.
p
| For example, here are three sentences containing the out-of-vocabulary
| word "labrador" in different contexts.
+code.
doc1 = nlp(u"The labrador barked.")
doc2 = nlp(u"The labrador swam.")
doc3 = nlp(u"the labrador people live in canada.")
for doc in [doc1, doc2, doc3]:
labrador = doc[1]
dog = nlp(u"dog")
print(labrador.similarity(dog))
p
| Even though the model has never seen the word "labrador", it can make a
| fairly accurate prediction of its similarity to "dog" in different
| contexts.
+table(["Context", "labrador.similarity(dog)"])
+row
+cell The #[strong labrador] barked.
+cell #[code 0.56] #[+procon("yes", "similar")]
+row
+cell The #[strong labrador] swam.
+cell #[code 0.48] #[+procon("no", "dissimilar")]
+row
+cell the #[strong labrador] people live in canada.
+cell #[code 0.39] #[+procon("no", "dissimilar")]
p
| The same also works for whole documents. Here, the variance of the
| similarities is lower, as all words and their order are taken into
| account. However, the context-specific similarity is often still
| reflected pretty accurately.
+code.
doc1 = nlp(u"Paris is the largest city in France.")
doc2 = nlp(u"Vilnius is the capital of Lithuania.")
doc3 = nlp(u"An emu is a large bird.")
for doc in [doc1, doc2, doc3]:
for other_doc in [doc1, doc2, doc3]:
print(doc.similarity(other_doc))
p
| Even though the sentences about Paris and Vilnius consist of different
| words and entities, they both describe the same concept and are seen as
| more similar than the sentence about emus. In this case, even a misspelled
| version of "Vilnius" would still produce very similar results.
+table
- var examples = {"Paris is the largest city in France.": [1, 0.85, 0.65], "Vilnius is the capital of Lithuania.": [0.85, 1, 0.55], "An emu is a large bird.": [0.65, 0.55, 1]}
- var counter = 0
+row
+row
+cell
for _, label in examples
+cell=label
each cells, label in examples
+row(counter ? null : "divider")
+cell=label
for cell in cells
+cell.u-text-center
- var result = cell < 0.7 ? ["no", "dissimilar"] : cell != 1 ? ["yes", "similar"] : ["neutral", "identical"]
| #[code=cell.toFixed(2)] #[+procon(...result)]
- counter++
p
| Sentences that consist of the same words in different order will likely
| be seen as very similar but never identical.
+code.
docs = [nlp(u"dog bites man"), nlp(u"man bites dog"),
nlp(u"man dog bites"), nlp(u"dog man bites")]
for doc in docs:
for other_doc in docs:
print(doc.similarity(other_doc))
p
| Interestingly, "man bites dog" and "man dog bites" are seen as slightly
| more similar than "man bites dog" and "dog bites man". This may be a
| conincidence or the result of "man" being interpreted as both sentence's
| subject.
+table
- var examples = {"dog bites man": [1, 0.9, 0.89, 0.92], "man bites dog": [0.9, 1, 0.93, 0.9], "man dog bites": [0.89, 0.93, 1, 0.92], "dog man bites": [0.92, 0.9, 0.92, 1]}
- var counter = 0
+row("head")
+cell
for _, label in examples
+cell.u-text-center=label
each cells, label in examples
+row(counter ? null : "divider")
+cell=label
for cell in cells
+cell.u-text-center
- var result = cell < 0.7 ? ["no", "dissimilar"] : cell != 1 ? ["yes", "similar"] : ["neutral", "identical"]
| #[code=cell.toFixed(2)] #[+procon(...result)]
- counter++