mirror of
				https://github.com/explosion/spaCy.git
				synced 2025-10-30 23:47:31 +03:00 
			
		
		
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
		
			123 lines
		
	
	
		
			4.4 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			123 lines
		
	
	
		
			4.4 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
| //- 💫 DOCS > USAGE > VECTORS & SIMILARITY > IN CONTEXT
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| p
 | ||
|     |  Aside from spaCy's built-in word vectors, which were trained on a lot of
 | ||
|     |  text with a wide vocabulary, the parsing, tagging and NER models also
 | ||
|     |  rely on vector representations of the #[strong meanings of words in context].
 | ||
|     |  As the first component of the
 | ||
|     |  #[+a("/usage/processing-pipelines") processing pipeline], the
 | ||
|     |  tensorizer encodes a document's internal meaning representations as an
 | ||
|     |  array of floats, also called a tensor. This allows spaCy to make a
 | ||
|     |  reasonable guess at a word's meaning, based on its surrounding words.
 | ||
|     |  Even if a word hasn't been seen before, spaCy will know #[em something]
 | ||
|     |  about it. Because spaCy uses a 4-layer convolutional network, the
 | ||
|     |  tensors are sensitive to up to #[strong four words on either side] of a
 | ||
|     |  word.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| p
 | ||
|     |  For example, here are three sentences containing the out-of-vocabulary
 | ||
|     |  word "labrador" in different contexts.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| +code.
 | ||
|     doc1 = nlp(u"The labrador barked.")
 | ||
|     doc2 = nlp(u"The labrador swam.")
 | ||
|     doc3 = nlp(u"the labrador people live in canada.")
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|     for doc in [doc1, doc2, doc3]:
 | ||
|         labrador = doc[1]
 | ||
|         dog = nlp(u"dog")
 | ||
|         print(labrador.similarity(dog))
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| p
 | ||
|     |  Even though the model has never seen the word "labrador", it can make a
 | ||
|     |  fairly accurate prediction of its similarity to "dog" in different
 | ||
|     |  contexts.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| +table(["Context", "labrador.similarity(dog)"])
 | ||
|     +row
 | ||
|         +cell The #[strong labrador] barked.
 | ||
|         +cell #[code 0.56] #[+procon("pro")]
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|     +row
 | ||
|         +cell The #[strong labrador] swam.
 | ||
|         +cell #[code 0.48] #[+procon("con")]
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|     +row
 | ||
|         +cell the #[strong labrador] people live in canada.
 | ||
|         +cell #[code 0.39] #[+procon("con")]
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| p
 | ||
|     |  The same also works for whole documents. Here, the variance of the
 | ||
|     |  similarities is lower, as all words and their order are taken into
 | ||
|     |  account. However, the context-specific similarity is often still
 | ||
|     |  reflected pretty accurately.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| +code.
 | ||
|     doc1 = nlp(u"Paris is the largest city in France.")
 | ||
|     doc2 = nlp(u"Vilnius is the capital of Lithuania.")
 | ||
|     doc3 = nlp(u"An emu is a large bird.")
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|     for doc in [doc1, doc2, doc3]:
 | ||
|         for other_doc in [doc1, doc2, doc3]:
 | ||
|             print(doc.similarity(other_doc))
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| p
 | ||
|     |  Even though the sentences about Paris and Vilnius consist of different
 | ||
|     |  words and entities, they both describe the same concept and are seen as
 | ||
|     |  more similar than the sentence about emus. In this case, even a misspelled
 | ||
|     |  version of "Vilnius" would still produce very similar results.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| +table
 | ||
|     - var examples = {"Paris is the largest city in France.": [1, 0.85, 0.65], "Vilnius is the capital of Lithuania.": [0.85, 1, 0.55], "An emu is a large bird.": [0.65, 0.55, 1]}
 | ||
|     - var counter = 0
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|     +row
 | ||
|     +row
 | ||
|         +cell
 | ||
|         for _, label in examples
 | ||
|             +cell=label
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|     each cells, label in examples
 | ||
|         +row(counter ? null : "divider")
 | ||
|             +cell=label
 | ||
|             for cell in cells
 | ||
|                 +cell.u-text-center #[code=cell.toFixed(2)]
 | ||
|                     |  #[+procon(cell < 0.7 ? "con" : cell != 1 ? "pro" : "neutral")]
 | ||
|         - counter++
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| p
 | ||
|     |  Sentences that consist of the same words in different order will likely
 | ||
|     |  be seen as very similar – but never identical.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| +code.
 | ||
|     docs = [nlp(u"dog bites man"), nlp(u"man bites dog"),
 | ||
|             nlp(u"man dog bites"), nlp(u"dog man bites")]
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|     for doc in docs:
 | ||
|         for other_doc in docs:
 | ||
|             print(doc.similarity(other_doc))
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| p
 | ||
|     |  Interestingly, "man bites dog" and "man dog bites" are seen as slightly
 | ||
|     |  more similar than "man bites dog" and "dog bites man". This may be a
 | ||
|     |  conincidence – or the result of "man" being interpreted as both sentence's
 | ||
|     |  subject.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| +table
 | ||
|     - var examples = {"dog bites man": [1, 0.9, 0.89, 0.92], "man bites dog": [0.9, 1, 0.93, 0.9], "man dog bites": [0.89, 0.93, 1, 0.92], "dog man bites": [0.92, 0.9, 0.92, 1]}
 | ||
|     - var counter = 0
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|     +row
 | ||
|     +row
 | ||
|         +cell
 | ||
|         for _, label in examples
 | ||
|             +cell.u-text-center=label
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|     each cells, label in examples
 | ||
|         +row(counter ? null : "divider")
 | ||
|             +cell=label
 | ||
|             for cell in cells
 | ||
|                 +cell.u-text-center #[code=cell.toFixed(2)]
 | ||
|                     |  #[+procon(cell < 0.7 ? "con" : cell != 1 ? "pro" : "neutral")]
 | ||
|         - counter++
 |