mirror of
https://github.com/explosion/spaCy.git
synced 2024-11-11 20:28:20 +03:00
246 lines
9.2 KiB
Plaintext
246 lines
9.2 KiB
Plaintext
//- 💫 DOCS > USAGE > TOKENIZER
|
|
|
|
include ../../_includes/_mixins
|
|
|
|
p
|
|
| Tokenization is the task of splitting a text into meaningful segments,
|
|
| called #[em tokens]. The input to the tokenizer is a unicode text, and
|
|
| the output is a #[+api("doc") #[code Doc]] object. To construct a
|
|
| #[code Doc] object, you need a #[+api("vocab") #[code Vocab]] instance,
|
|
| a sequence of #[code word] strings, and optionally a sequence of
|
|
| #[code spaces] booleans, which allow you to maintain alignment of the
|
|
| tokens into the original string.
|
|
|
|
+aside("See Also")
|
|
| If you haven't read up on spaCy's #[+a("data-model") data model] yet,
|
|
| you should probably have a look. The main point to keep in mind is that
|
|
| spaCy's #[code Doc] doesn't copy or refer to the original string. The
|
|
| string is reconstructed from the tokens when required.
|
|
|
|
|
|
+h(2, "special-cases") Adding special case tokenization rules
|
|
|
|
p
|
|
| Most domains have at least some idiosyncracies that require custom
|
|
| tokenization rules. Here's how to add a special case rule to an existing
|
|
| #[+api("tokenizer") #[code Tokenizer]] instance:
|
|
|
|
+code.
|
|
import spacy
|
|
from spacy.symbols import ORTH, LEMMA, POS
|
|
|
|
nlp = spacy.load('en')
|
|
assert [w.text for w in nlp(u'gimme that')] == [u'gimme', u'that']
|
|
nlp.tokenizer.add_special_case(u'gimme',
|
|
[
|
|
{
|
|
ORTH: u'gim',
|
|
LEMMA: u'give',
|
|
POS: u'VERB'},
|
|
{
|
|
ORTH: u'me'}])
|
|
assert [w.text for w in nlp(u'gimme that')] == [u'gim', u'me', u'that']
|
|
assert [w.lemma_ for w in nlp(u'gimme that')] == [u'give', u'me', u'that']
|
|
|
|
p
|
|
| The special case doesn't have to match an entire whitespace-delimited
|
|
| substring. The tokenizer will incrementally split off punctuation, and
|
|
| keep looking up the remaining substring:
|
|
|
|
+code.
|
|
assert 'gimme' not in [w.text for w in nlp(u'gimme!')]
|
|
assert 'gimme' not in [w.text for w in nlp(u'("...gimme...?")')]
|
|
|
|
p
|
|
| The special case rules have precedence over the punctuation splitting:
|
|
|
|
+code.
|
|
nlp.tokenizer.add_special_case(u'...gimme...?',
|
|
[{
|
|
ORTH: u'...gimme...?', LEMMA: u'give', TAG: u'VB'}])
|
|
assert len(nlp(u'...gimme...?')) == 1
|
|
|
|
p
|
|
| Because the special-case rules allow you to set arbitrary token
|
|
| attributes, such as the part-of-speech, lemma, etc, they make a good
|
|
| mechanism for arbitrary fix-up rules. Having this logic live in the
|
|
| tokenizer isn't very satisfying from a design perspective, however, so
|
|
| the API may eventually be exposed on the
|
|
| #[+api("language") #[code Language]] class itself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
+h(2, "how-tokenizer-works") How spaCy's tokenizer works
|
|
|
|
p
|
|
| spaCy introduces a novel tokenization algorithm, that gives a better
|
|
| balance between performance, ease of definition, and ease of alignment
|
|
| into the original string.
|
|
|
|
p
|
|
| After consuming a prefix or infix, we consult the special cases again.
|
|
| We want the special cases to handle things like "don't" in English, and
|
|
| we want the same rule to work for "(don't)!". We do this by splitting
|
|
| off the open bracket, then the exclamation, then the close bracket, and
|
|
| finally matching the special-case. Here's an implementation of the
|
|
| algorithm in Python, optimized for readability rather than performance:
|
|
|
|
+code.
|
|
def tokenizer_pseudo_code(text, find_prefix, find_suffix,
|
|
find_infixes, special_cases):
|
|
tokens = []
|
|
for substring in text.split(' '):
|
|
suffixes = []
|
|
while substring:
|
|
if substring in special_cases:
|
|
tokens.extend(special_cases[substring])
|
|
substring = ''
|
|
elif find_prefix(substring) is not None:
|
|
split = find_prefix(substring)
|
|
tokens.append(substring[:split])
|
|
substring = substring[split:]
|
|
elif find_suffix(substring) is not None:
|
|
split = find_suffix(substring)
|
|
suffixes.append(substring[split:])
|
|
substring = substring[:split]
|
|
elif find_infixes(substring):
|
|
infixes = find_infixes(substring)
|
|
offset = 0
|
|
for match in infixes:
|
|
tokens.append(substring[i : match.start()])
|
|
tokens.append(substring[match.start() : match.end()])
|
|
offset = match.end()
|
|
substring = substring[offset:]
|
|
else:
|
|
tokens.append(substring)
|
|
substring = ''
|
|
tokens.extend(reversed(suffixes))
|
|
return tokens
|
|
|
|
p
|
|
| The algorithm can be summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
+list("numbers")
|
|
+item Iterate over space-separated substrings
|
|
+item
|
|
| Check whether we have an explicitly defined rule for this substring.
|
|
| If we do, use it.
|
|
+item Otherwise, try to consume a prefix.
|
|
+item
|
|
| If we consumed a prefix, go back to the beginning of the loop, so
|
|
| that special-cases always get priority.
|
|
+item If we didn't consume a prefix, try to consume a suffix.
|
|
+item
|
|
| If we can't consume a prefix or suffix, look for "infixes" — stuff
|
|
| like hyphens etc.
|
|
+item Once we can't consume any more of the string, handle it as a single token.
|
|
|
|
+h(2, "native-tokenizers") Customizing spaCy's Tokenizer class
|
|
|
|
p
|
|
| Let's imagine you wanted to create a tokenizer for a new language. There
|
|
| are four things you would need to define:
|
|
|
|
+list("numbers")
|
|
+item
|
|
| A dictionary of #[strong special cases]. This handles things like
|
|
| contractions, units of measurement, emoticons, certain
|
|
| abbreviations, etc.
|
|
|
|
+item
|
|
| A function #[code prefix_search], to handle
|
|
| #[strong preceding punctuation], such as open quotes, open brackets,
|
|
| etc
|
|
|
|
+item
|
|
| A function #[code suffix_search], to handle
|
|
| #[strong succeeding punctuation], such as commas, periods, close
|
|
| quotes, etc.
|
|
|
|
+item
|
|
| A function #[code infixes_finditer], to handle non-whitespace
|
|
| separators, such as hyphens etc.
|
|
|
|
p
|
|
| You shouldn't usually need to create a #[code Tokenizer] subclass.
|
|
| Standard usage is to use #[code re.compile()] to build a regular
|
|
| expression object, and pass its #[code .search()] and
|
|
| #[code .finditer()] methods:
|
|
|
|
+code.
|
|
import re
|
|
from spacy.tokenizer import Tokenizer
|
|
|
|
prefix_re = re.compile(r'''[\[\("']''')
|
|
suffix_re = re.compile(r'''[\]\)"']''')
|
|
def create_tokenizer(nlp):
|
|
return Tokenizer(nlp.vocab,
|
|
prefix_search=prefix_re.search,
|
|
suffix_search=suffix_re.search)
|
|
|
|
nlp = spacy.load('en', tokenizer=create_make_doc)
|
|
|
|
p
|
|
| If you need to subclass the tokenizer instead, the relevant methods to
|
|
| specialize are #[code find_prefix], #[code find_suffix] and
|
|
| #[code find_infix].
|
|
|
|
+h(2, "custom-tokenizer") Hooking an arbitrary tokenizer into the pipeline
|
|
|
|
p
|
|
| You can pass a custom tokenizer using the #[code make_doc] keyword, when
|
|
| you're creating the pipeline:
|
|
|
|
+code.
|
|
import spacy
|
|
|
|
nlp = spacy.load('en', make_doc=my_tokenizer)
|
|
|
|
p
|
|
| However, this approach often leaves us with a chicken-and-egg problem.
|
|
| To construct the tokenizer, we usually want attributes of the #[code nlp]
|
|
| pipeline. Specifically, we want the tokenizer to hold a reference to the
|
|
| pipeline's vocabulary object. Let's say we have the following class as
|
|
| our tokenizer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
+code.
|
|
import spacy
|
|
from spacy.tokens import Doc
|
|
|
|
class WhitespaceTokenizer(object):
|
|
def __init__(self, nlp):
|
|
self.vocab = nlp.vocab
|
|
|
|
def __call__(self, text):
|
|
words = text.split(' ')
|
|
# All tokens 'own' a subsequent space character in this tokenizer
|
|
spaces = [True] * len(words)
|
|
return Doc(self.vocab, words=words, spaces=spaces)
|
|
|
|
p
|
|
| As you can see, we need a #[code vocab] instance to construct this — but
|
|
| we won't get the #[code vocab] instance until we get back the #[code nlp]
|
|
| object from #[code spacy.load()]. The simplest solution is to build the
|
|
| object in two steps:
|
|
|
|
+code.
|
|
nlp = spacy.load('en')
|
|
nlp.make_doc = WhitespaceTokenizer(nlp)
|
|
|
|
p
|
|
| You can instead pass the class to the #[code create_make_doc] keyword,
|
|
| which is invoked as callback once the #[code nlp] object is ready:
|
|
|
|
+code.
|
|
nlp = spacy.load('en', create_make_doc=WhitespaceTokenizer)
|
|
|
|
p
|
|
| Finally, you can of course create your own subclasses, and create a bound
|
|
| #[code make_doc] method. The disadvantage of this approach is that spaCy
|
|
| uses inheritance to give each language-specific pipeline its own class.
|
|
| If you're working with multiple languages, a naive solution will
|
|
| therefore require one custom class per language you're working with.
|
|
| This might be at least annoying. You may be able to do something more
|
|
| generic by doing some clever magic with metaclasses or mixins, if that's
|
|
| the sort of thing you're into.
|