mirror of
https://github.com/explosion/spaCy.git
synced 2024-11-11 04:08:09 +03:00
97 lines
5.4 KiB
Plaintext
97 lines
5.4 KiB
Plaintext
include ../_includes/_mixins
|
|
|
|
+lead For the last two years, I’ve done almost all of my work in #[a(href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cython" target="_blank") Cython]. And I don’t mean, I write Python, and then “Cythonize” it, with various type-declarations etc. I just, write Cython. I use “raw” C structs and arrays, and occasionally C++ vectors, with a thin wrapper around malloc/free that I wrote myself. The code is almost always exactly as fast as C/C++, because it really is just C/C++ with some syntactic sugar — but with Python “right there”, should I need/want it.
|
|
|
|
p This is basically the inverse of the old promise that languages like Python came with: that you would write your whole application in Python, optimise the “hot spots” with C, and voila! C speed, Python convenience, and money in the bank.
|
|
|
|
p This was always much nicer in theory than practice. In practice, your data structures have a huge influence on both the efficiency of your code, and how annoying it is to write. Arrays are a pain and fast; lists are blissfully convenient, and very slow. Python loops and function calls are also quite slow, so the part you have to write in C tends to wriggle its way up the stack, until it’s almost your whole application.
|
|
|
|
p Today a post came up on HN, on #[a(href="https://www.crumpington.com/blog/2014/10-19-high-performance-python-extensions-part-1.html" target="_blank") writing C extensions for Python]. The author wrote both a pure Python implementation, and a C implementation, using the Numpy C API. This seemed a good opportunity to demonstrate the difference, so I wrote a Cython implementation for comparison:
|
|
|
|
+code.
|
|
import random
|
|
from cymem.cymem cimport Pool
|
|
|
|
from libc.math cimport sqrt
|
|
|
|
cimport cython
|
|
|
|
cdef struct Point:
|
|
double x
|
|
double y
|
|
|
|
cdef class World:
|
|
cdef Pool mem
|
|
cdef int N
|
|
cdef double* m
|
|
cdef Point* r
|
|
cdef Point* v
|
|
cdef Point* F
|
|
cdef readonly double dt
|
|
def __init__(self, N, threads=1, m_min=1, m_max=30.0, r_max=50.0, v_max=4.0, dt=1e-3):
|
|
self.mem = Pool()
|
|
self.N = N
|
|
self.m = <double*>self.mem.alloc(N, sizeof(double))
|
|
self.r = <Point*>self.mem.alloc(N, sizeof(Point))
|
|
self.v = <Point*>self.mem.alloc(N, sizeof(Point))
|
|
self.F = <Point*>self.mem.alloc(N, sizeof(Point))
|
|
for i in range(N):
|
|
self.m[i] = random.uniform(m_min, m_max)
|
|
self.r[i].x = random.uniform(-r_max, r_max)
|
|
self.r[i].y = random.uniform(-r_max, r_max)
|
|
self.v[i].x = random.uniform(-v_max, v_max)
|
|
self.v[i].y = random.uniform(-v_max, v_max)
|
|
self.F[i].x = 0
|
|
self.F[i].y = 0
|
|
self.dt = dt
|
|
|
|
|
|
@cython.cdivision(True)
|
|
def compute_F(World w):
|
|
"""Compute the force on each body in the world, w."""
|
|
cdef int i, j
|
|
cdef double s3, tmp
|
|
cdef Point s
|
|
cdef Point F
|
|
for i in range(w.N):
|
|
# Set all forces to zero.
|
|
w.F[i].x = 0
|
|
w.F[i].y = 0
|
|
for j in range(i+1, w.N):
|
|
s.x = w.r[j].x - w.r[i].x
|
|
s.y = w.r[j].y - w.r[i].y
|
|
|
|
s3 = sqrt(s.x * s.x + s.y * s.y)
|
|
s3 *= s3 * s3;
|
|
|
|
tmp = w.m[i] * w.m[j] / s3
|
|
F.x = tmp * s.x
|
|
F.y = tmp * s.y
|
|
|
|
w.F[i].x += F.x
|
|
w.F[i].y += F.y
|
|
|
|
w.F[j].x -= F.x
|
|
w.F[j].y -= F.y
|
|
|
|
|
|
@cython.cdivision(True)
|
|
def evolve(World w, int steps):
|
|
"""Evolve the world, w, through the given number of steps."""
|
|
cdef int _, i
|
|
for _ in range(steps):
|
|
compute_F(w)
|
|
for i in range(w.N):
|
|
w.v[i].x += w.F[i].x * w.dt / w.m[i]
|
|
w.v[i].y += w.F[i].y * w.dt / w.m[i]
|
|
w.r[i].x += w.v[i].x * w.dt
|
|
w.r[i].y += w.v[i].y * w.dt
|
|
|
|
p The Cython version took about 30 minutes to write, and it runs just as fast as the C code — because, why wouldn’t it? It *is* C code, really, with just some syntactic sugar. And you don’t even have to learn or think about a foreign, complicated C API…You just, write C. Or C++ — although that’s a little more awkward. Both the Cython version and the C version are about 70x faster than the pure Python version, which uses Numpy arrays.
|
|
|
|
p One difference from C: I wrote a little wrapper around malloc/free, #[a(href="https://github.com/syllog1sm/cymem" target="_blank") cymem]. All it does is remember the addresses it served, and when the Pool is garbage collected, it frees the memory it allocated. I’ve had no trouble with memory leaks since I started using this.
|
|
|
|
p The “intermediate” way of writing Cython, using typed memory-views, allows you to use the Numpy multi-dimensional array features. However, to me it feels more complicated, and the applications I tend to write involve very sparse arrays — where, once again, I want to define my own data structures.
|
|
|
|
+infobox("Note") I found a Russian translation of this post #[a(href="http://habrahabr.ru/company/mailru/blog/242533/" target="_blank") here]. I don’t know how accurate it is.
|