mirror of
https://github.com/graphql-python/graphene-django.git
synced 2024-11-22 09:37:07 +03:00
Revert field resolver logic to fix poor query performance
This reverts the change to `convert_field_to_djangomodel` introduced in https://github.com/graphql-python/graphene-django/pull/1315 for the reasons discussed here https://github.com/graphql-python/graphene-django/pull/1315/files#r1015659857. As mentioned there, without reverting this code, "queries are forced every time an object is resolved, making an exponential number of queries when nesting without any possibility of optimizing". That regression prevented `graphene-django-optimizer` from working with `graphene-django` v3.0.0b9+ (where this change first was published), as discussed in https://github.com/graphql-python/graphene-django/issues/1356#issuecomment-1284718187, https://github.com/tfoxy/graphene-django-optimizer/issues/86, and https://github.com/tfoxy/graphene-django-optimizer/pull/83#issuecomment-1451987397. For now, this marks the two tests that depended on this problematic code as "expected to fail", and perhaps they can be reintroduced if there's a way to support this logic in a way that does not prevent `select_related` and `prefetch_related` query-optimization and introduce nested N+1s. As mentioned here https://github.com/graphql-python/graphene-django/pull/1315#issuecomment-1468594361, this is blocking upgrade to graphene-django v3 for many users, and fixing this would allow many to begin upgrading and contributing to keep graphene-django going.
This commit is contained in:
parent
34cc86063b
commit
f67c5dbc8c
|
@ -315,26 +315,7 @@ def convert_field_to_djangomodel(field, registry=None):
|
|||
if not _type:
|
||||
return
|
||||
|
||||
class CustomField(Field):
|
||||
def wrap_resolve(self, parent_resolver):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Implements a custom resolver which go through the `get_node` method to ensure that
|
||||
it goes through the `get_queryset` method of the DjangoObjectType.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
resolver = super().wrap_resolve(parent_resolver)
|
||||
|
||||
def custom_resolver(root, info, **args):
|
||||
fk_obj = resolver(root, info, **args)
|
||||
if not isinstance(fk_obj, model):
|
||||
# In case the resolver is a custom one that overwrites
|
||||
# the default Django resolver
|
||||
# This happens, for example, when using custom awaitable resolvers.
|
||||
return fk_obj
|
||||
return _type.get_node(info, fk_obj.pk)
|
||||
|
||||
return custom_resolver
|
||||
|
||||
return CustomField(
|
||||
return Field(
|
||||
_type,
|
||||
description=get_django_field_description(field),
|
||||
required=not field.null,
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -121,6 +121,10 @@ class TestShouldCallGetQuerySetOnForeignKey:
|
|||
assert not result.errors
|
||||
assert result.data == {"reporter": {"firstName": "Jane"}}
|
||||
|
||||
# TODO: This test is currently expected to fail because the logic it depended on has been
|
||||
# removed, due to poor SQL performance and preventing query-optimization (see
|
||||
# https://github.com/graphql-python/graphene-django/pull/1315/files#r1015659857)
|
||||
@pytest.mark.xfail
|
||||
def test_get_queryset_called_on_foreignkey(self):
|
||||
# If a user tries to access a reporter through an article they should get our authorization error
|
||||
query = """
|
||||
|
@ -291,6 +295,10 @@ class TestShouldCallGetQuerySetOnForeignKeyNode:
|
|||
assert not result.errors
|
||||
assert result.data == {"reporter": {"firstName": "Jane"}}
|
||||
|
||||
# TODO: This test is currently expected to fail because the logic it depended on has been
|
||||
# removed, due to poor SQL performance and preventing query-optimization (see
|
||||
# https://github.com/graphql-python/graphene-django/pull/1315/files#r1015659857)
|
||||
@pytest.mark.xfail
|
||||
def test_get_queryset_called_on_foreignkey(self):
|
||||
# If a user tries to access a reporter through an article they should get our authorization error
|
||||
query = """
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user