mirror of
https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow.git
synced 2024-12-24 00:46:16 +03:00
Gaussian blur and unsharp mask chapters
This commit is contained in:
parent
ca108113ba
commit
c830b1ffcb
|
@ -103,12 +103,42 @@ which doesn't fit in processor cache.
|
|||
Gaussian blur and unsharp mask
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
:py:meth:`~PIL.ImageFilter.GaussianBlur` implementation was replaced with
|
||||
sequential applying of series of box filters. New implementation is based on
|
||||
"Theoretical foundations of Gaussian convolution by extended box filtering" from
|
||||
Mathematical Image Analysis Group. As :py:meth:`~PIL.ImageFilter.UnsharpMask`
|
||||
implementations uses Gaussian blur internally, all changes from this chapter
|
||||
alse applyable to it.
|
||||
|
||||
Blur radius
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
||||
There was an error in previous version of PIL, when blur radius (the standard
|
||||
deviation of Gaussian) is actually meant blur diameter.
|
||||
For example for blurring image with actual radius 5 you were forced
|
||||
to use value 10. This was fixed. For now the meaning of the radius
|
||||
is the same as in other software.
|
||||
|
||||
If you used a Gaussian blur with some radius value, you need to devide this
|
||||
value by two.
|
||||
|
||||
Blur Performance
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
||||
Box filter computation time is constant relative to the radius and depends
|
||||
on source image size only. Because new Gaussian blur implementation
|
||||
is based on box filter, it's computation time is also doesn't depends on blur
|
||||
radius.
|
||||
|
||||
If before execution time for the same test image was 1 second for radius 1,
|
||||
3.6 seconds for radius 10, 17 seconds for 50. Now blur with any radius on same
|
||||
image is executed for 0.2 seconds.
|
||||
|
||||
Blur quality
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
||||
Previous implementation takes in account only source pixels within
|
||||
2 * standard deviation radius for every destination pixel. This was not enought,
|
||||
so qulity was worse compared to other Gaussian blur software.
|
||||
|
||||
The new implementation does not have this drawback.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user