mirror of
https://github.com/cookiecutter/cookiecutter-django.git
synced 2024-11-29 21:14:03 +03:00
105 lines
5.5 KiB
Markdown
105 lines
5.5 KiB
Markdown
# Maintainer guide
|
|
|
|
This document is intended for maintainers of the template.
|
|
|
|
## Automated updates
|
|
|
|
We use 2 separate services to keep our dependencies up-to-date:
|
|
|
|
- Dependabot, which manages updates of Python deps of the template, GitHub actions, npm packages and Docker images.
|
|
- PyUp, which manages the Python deps for the generated project.
|
|
|
|
We don't use Dependabot for the generated project deps because our requirements files are templated, and Dependabot fails to parse them. PyUp is -AFAIK- the only service out there that supports having Jinja tags in the requirements file.
|
|
|
|
Updates for the template should be labelled as `project infrastructure` while the ones about the generated project should be labelled as `update`. This is use to work in conjunction with our changelog script (see later).
|
|
|
|
## Automation scripts
|
|
|
|
We have a few workflows which have been automated over time. They usually run using GitHub actions and might need a few small manual actions to work nicely. Some have a few limitations which we should document here.
|
|
|
|
### CI
|
|
|
|
`ci.yml`
|
|
|
|
The CI workflow tries to cover 2 main aspects of the template:
|
|
|
|
- Check all combinations to make sure that valid files are generated with no major linting issues. Issues which are fixed by an auto-formatter after generation aren't considered major, and only aim for best effort. This is under the `test` job.
|
|
- Run more in-depth tests on a few combinations, by installing dependencies, running type checker and the test suite of the generated project. We try to cover docker (`docker` job) and non-docker (`bare` job) setups.
|
|
|
|
We also run the deployment checks, but we don't do much more beyond that for testing the production setup.
|
|
|
|
### Django issue checker
|
|
|
|
`django-issue-checker.yml`
|
|
|
|
This workflow runs daily, on schedule, and checks if there is a new major version of Django (not in the pure SemVer sense) released that we are not running, and list our dependencies compatibility.
|
|
|
|
For example, at time of writing, we use Django 4.2, but the latest version of Django is 5.0, so the workflow created a ["Django 5.0" issue](https://github.com/cookiecutter/cookiecutter-django/issues/4724) in GitHub, with a compatibility table and keeps it up to date every day.
|
|
|
|
#### Limitations
|
|
|
|
Here are a few current and past limitations of the script
|
|
|
|
- When a new dependency is added to the template, the script fails to update an existing issue
|
|
- Not sure what happens when a deps is removed
|
|
- ~~Unable to parse classifiers without minor version~~
|
|
- ~~Creates an issue even if we are on the latest version~~
|
|
|
|
### Issue manager
|
|
|
|
`issue-manager.yml`
|
|
|
|
A workflow that uses [Sebastian Ramirez' issue-manager](https://github.com/tiangolo/issue-manager) to help us automate issue management. The tag line from the repo explains it well:
|
|
|
|
> Automatically close issues or Pull Requests that have a label, after a custom delay, if no one replies back.
|
|
|
|
It runs on a schedule as well as when some actions are taken on issues and pull requests.
|
|
|
|
We wait 10 days before closing issues, and we have a few customised reasons, which are configured in the workflow itself. The config should be fairly self-explanatory.
|
|
|
|
### Pre-commit auto-update
|
|
|
|
`pre-commit-autoupdate.yml`
|
|
|
|
Run daily, to do `pre-commit autoupdate` on the template as well as the generated project, and opens a pull request with the changes.
|
|
|
|
#### Limitations
|
|
|
|
- The PR is open as GitHub action which means that CI does NOT run. The documentation for create-pull-request action [explains why](https://github.com/peter-evans/create-pull-request/blob/main/docs/concepts-guidelines.md#triggering-further-workflow-runs).
|
|
- Some hooks are also installed as local dependencies (via `requirements/local.txt`), but these are updated separately via PyUP.
|
|
|
|
### Update changelog
|
|
|
|
`update-changelog.yml`
|
|
|
|
Run daily at 2AM to update our changelog and create a GitHub release. This runs a custom script which:
|
|
|
|
- List all pull requests merged the day before
|
|
- The release name is calendar based, so `YYYY.MM.DD`
|
|
- For each PR:
|
|
- Get the PR title to summarize the change
|
|
- Look at the PR labels to classify it in a section of the release notes:
|
|
- anything labelled `project infrastructure` is excluded
|
|
- label `update` goes in section "Updated"
|
|
- label `bug` goes in section "Fixed"
|
|
- label `docs` goes in section "Documentation"
|
|
- Default to section "Changed"
|
|
|
|
With that in mind, when merging changes, it's a good idea to set the labels and rename the PR title to give a good summary of the change, in the context of the changelog.
|
|
|
|
#### Limitations
|
|
|
|
- Dependabot updates for npm & Docker have a verbose title, try to rename them to be more readable: `Bump webpack-dev-server from 4.15.1 to 5.0.2 in /{{cookiecutter.project_slug}}` -> `Bump webpack-dev-server to 5.0.2`
|
|
- ~~Dependencies updates for the template repo (tox, cookiecutter, etc...) don't need to appear in changelog, and need to be labelled as `project infrastructure` manually. By default, they come from PyUp labelled as `update`.~~
|
|
|
|
### Update contributors
|
|
|
|
`update-contributors.yml`
|
|
|
|
Runs on each push to master branch. List the 5 most recently merged pull requests and extract their author. If any of the authors is a new one, updates the `.github/contributors.json`, regenerate the `CONTRIBUTORS.md` from it, and push back the changes to master.
|
|
|
|
#### Limitations
|
|
|
|
- If you merge a pull request from a new contributor, and merge another one right after, the push to master will fail as the remote will be out of date.
|
|
- If you merge more than 5 pull requests in a row like this, the new contributor might fail to be added.
|