django-rest-framework/docs/tutorial/6-viewsets-and-routers.md
Tom Christie 0dec36eb41 Version 3.5 (#4525)
* Start test case

* Added 'requests' test client

* Address typos

* Graceful fallback if requests is not installed.

* Add cookie support

* Tests for auth and CSRF

* Py3 compat

* py3 compat

* py3 compat

* Add get_requests_client

* Added SchemaGenerator.should_include_link

* add settings for html cutoff on related fields

* Router doesn't work if prefix is blank, though project urls.py handles prefix

* Fix Django 1.10 to-many deprecation

* Add django.core.urlresolvers compatibility

* Update django-filter & django-guardian

* Check for empty router prefix; adjust URL accordingly

It's easiest to fix this issue after we have made the regex.  To try
to fix it before would require doing something different for List vs
Detail, which means we'd have to know which type of url we're
constructing before acting accordingly.

* Fix misc django deprecations

* Use TOC extension instead of header

* Fix deprecations for py3k

* Add py3k compatibility to is_simple_callable

* Add is_simple_callable tests

* Drop python 3.2 support (EOL, Dropped by Django)

* schema_renderers= should *set* the renderers, not append to them.

* API client (#4424)

* Fix release notes

* Add note about 'User account is disabled.' vs 'Unable to log in'

* Clean up schema generation (#4527)

* Handle multiple methods on custom action (#4529)

* RequestsClient, CoreAPIClient

* exclude_from_schema

* Added 'get_schema_view()' shortcut

* Added schema descriptions

* Better descriptions for schemas

* Add type annotation to schema generation

* Coerce schema 'pk' in path to actual field name

* Deprecations move into assertion errors

* Use get_schema_view in tests

* Updte CoreJSON media type

* Handle schema structure correctly when path prefixs exist. Closes #4401

* Add PendingDeprecation to Router schema generation.

* Added SCHEMA_COERCE_PATH_PK and SCHEMA_COERCE_METHOD_NAMES

* Renamed and documented 'get_schema_fields' interface.
2016-10-10 13:03:46 +01:00

6.9 KiB

Tutorial 6: ViewSets & Routers

REST framework includes an abstraction for dealing with ViewSets, that allows the developer to concentrate on modeling the state and interactions of the API, and leave the URL construction to be handled automatically, based on common conventions.

ViewSet classes are almost the same thing as View classes, except that they provide operations such as read, or update, and not method handlers such as get or put.

A ViewSet class is only bound to a set of method handlers at the last moment, when it is instantiated into a set of views, typically by using a Router class which handles the complexities of defining the URL conf for you.

Refactoring to use ViewSets

Let's take our current set of views, and refactor them into view sets.

First of all let's refactor our UserList and UserDetail views into a single UserViewSet. We can remove the two views, and replace them with a single class:

from rest_framework import viewsets

class UserViewSet(viewsets.ReadOnlyModelViewSet):
    """
    This viewset automatically provides `list` and `detail` actions.
    """
    queryset = User.objects.all()
    serializer_class = UserSerializer

Here we've used the ReadOnlyModelViewSet class to automatically provide the default 'read-only' operations. We're still setting the queryset and serializer_class attributes exactly as we did when we were using regular views, but we no longer need to provide the same information to two separate classes.

Next we're going to replace the SnippetList, SnippetDetail and SnippetHighlight view classes. We can remove the three views, and again replace them with a single class.

from rest_framework.decorators import detail_route

class SnippetViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
    """
    This viewset automatically provides `list`, `create`, `retrieve`,
    `update` and `destroy` actions.

    Additionally we also provide an extra `highlight` action.
    """
    queryset = Snippet.objects.all()
    serializer_class = SnippetSerializer
    permission_classes = (permissions.IsAuthenticatedOrReadOnly,
                          IsOwnerOrReadOnly,)

    @detail_route(renderer_classes=[renderers.StaticHTMLRenderer])
    def highlight(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
        snippet = self.get_object()
        return Response(snippet.highlighted)

    def perform_create(self, serializer):
        serializer.save(owner=self.request.user)

This time we've used the ModelViewSet class in order to get the complete set of default read and write operations.

Notice that we've also used the @detail_route decorator to create a custom action, named highlight. This decorator can be used to add any custom endpoints that don't fit into the standard create/update/delete style.

Custom actions which use the @detail_route decorator will respond to GET requests. We can use the methods argument if we wanted an action that responded to POST requests.

The URLs for custom actions by default depend on the method name itself. If you want to change the way url should be constructed, you can include url_path as a decorator keyword argument.

Binding ViewSets to URLs explicitly

The handler methods only get bound to the actions when we define the URLConf. To see what's going on under the hood let's first explicitly create a set of views from our ViewSets.

In the urls.py file we bind our ViewSet classes into a set of concrete views.

from snippets.views import SnippetViewSet, UserViewSet, api_root
from rest_framework import renderers

snippet_list = SnippetViewSet.as_view({
    'get': 'list',
    'post': 'create'
})
snippet_detail = SnippetViewSet.as_view({
    'get': 'retrieve',
    'put': 'update',
    'patch': 'partial_update',
    'delete': 'destroy'
})
snippet_highlight = SnippetViewSet.as_view({
    'get': 'highlight'
}, renderer_classes=[renderers.StaticHTMLRenderer])
user_list = UserViewSet.as_view({
    'get': 'list'
})
user_detail = UserViewSet.as_view({
    'get': 'retrieve'
})

Notice how we're creating multiple views from each ViewSet class, by binding the http methods to the required action for each view.

Now that we've bound our resources into concrete views, we can register the views with the URL conf as usual.

urlpatterns = format_suffix_patterns([
    url(r'^$', api_root),
    url(r'^snippets/$', snippet_list, name='snippet-list'),
    url(r'^snippets/(?P<id>[0-9]+)/$', snippet_detail, name='snippet-detail'),
    url(r'^snippets/(?P<id>[0-9]+)/highlight/$', snippet_highlight, name='snippet-highlight'),
    url(r'^users/$', user_list, name='user-list'),
    url(r'^users/(?P<id>[0-9]+)/$', user_detail, name='user-detail')
])

Using Routers

Because we're using ViewSet classes rather than View classes, we actually don't need to design the URL conf ourselves. The conventions for wiring up resources into views and urls can be handled automatically, using a Router class. All we need to do is register the appropriate view sets with a router, and let it do the rest.

Here's our re-wired urls.py file.

from django.conf.urls import url, include
from snippets import views
from rest_framework.routers import DefaultRouter

# Create a router and register our viewsets with it.
router = DefaultRouter()
router.register(r'snippets', views.SnippetViewSet)
router.register(r'users', views.UserViewSet)

# The API URLs are now determined automatically by the router.
# Additionally, we include the login URLs for the browsable API.
urlpatterns = [
    url(r'^', include(router.urls)),
    url(r'^api-auth/', include('rest_framework.urls', namespace='rest_framework'))
]

Registering the viewsets with the router is similar to providing a urlpattern. We include two arguments - the URL prefix for the views, and the viewset itself.

The DefaultRouter class we're using also automatically creates the API root view for us, so we can now delete the api_root method from our views module.

Trade-offs between views vs viewsets

Using viewsets can be a really useful abstraction. It helps ensure that URL conventions will be consistent across your API, minimizes the amount of code you need to write, and allows you to concentrate on the interactions and representations your API provides rather than the specifics of the URL conf.

That doesn't mean it's always the right approach to take. There's a similar set of trade-offs to consider as when using class-based views instead of function based views. Using viewsets is less explicit than building your views individually.

In part 7 of the tutorial we'll look at how we can add an API schema, and interact with our API using a client library or command line tool.