mirror of
https://github.com/encode/django-rest-framework.git
synced 2025-10-31 07:57:55 +03:00
81 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown
81 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown
# Browser enhancements
|
|
|
|
> "There are two noncontroversial uses for overloaded POST. The first is to *simulate* HTTP's uniform interface for clients like web browsers that don't support PUT or DELETE"
|
|
>
|
|
> — [RESTful Web Services][cite], Leonard Richardson & Sam Ruby.
|
|
|
|
## Browser based PUT, DELETE, etc...
|
|
|
|
REST framework supports browser-based `PUT`, `DELETE` and other methods, by
|
|
overloading `POST` requests using a hidden form field.
|
|
|
|
Note that this is the same strategy as is used in [Ruby on Rails][rails].
|
|
|
|
For example, given the following form:
|
|
|
|
<form action="/news-items/5" method="POST">
|
|
<input type="hidden" name="_method" value="DELETE">
|
|
</form>
|
|
|
|
`request.method` would return `"DELETE"`.
|
|
|
|
## HTTP header based method overriding
|
|
|
|
REST framework also supports method overriding via the semi-standard `X-HTTP-Method-Override` header. This can be useful if you are working with non-form content such as JSON and are working with an older web server and/or hosting provider that doesn't recognise particular HTTP methods such as `PATCH`. For example [Amazon Web Services ELB][aws_elb].
|
|
|
|
To use it, make a `POST` request, setting the `X-HTTP-Method-Override` header.
|
|
|
|
For example, making a `PATCH` request via `POST` in jQuery:
|
|
|
|
$.ajax({
|
|
url: '/myresource/',
|
|
method: 'POST',
|
|
headers: {'X-HTTP-Method-Override': 'PATCH'},
|
|
...
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
## Browser based submission of non-form content
|
|
|
|
Browser-based submission of content types other than form are supported by
|
|
using form fields named `_content` and `_content_type`:
|
|
|
|
For example, given the following form:
|
|
|
|
<form action="/news-items/5" method="PUT">
|
|
<input type="hidden" name="_content_type" value="application/json">
|
|
<input name="_content" value="{'count': 1}">
|
|
</form>
|
|
|
|
`request.content_type` would return `"application/json"`, and
|
|
`request.stream` would return `"{'count': 1}"`
|
|
|
|
## URL based accept headers
|
|
|
|
REST framework can take `?accept=application/json` style URL parameters,
|
|
which allow the `Accept` header to be overridden.
|
|
|
|
This can be useful for testing the API from a web browser, where you don't
|
|
have any control over what is sent in the `Accept` header.
|
|
|
|
## URL based format suffixes
|
|
|
|
REST framework can take `?format=json` style URL parameters, which can be a
|
|
useful shortcut for determining which content type should be returned from
|
|
the view.
|
|
|
|
This is a more concise than using the `accept` override, but it also gives
|
|
you less control. (For example you can't specify any media type parameters)
|
|
|
|
## Doesn't HTML5 support PUT and DELETE forms?
|
|
|
|
Nope. It was at one point intended to support `PUT` and `DELETE` forms, but
|
|
was later [dropped from the spec][html5]. There remains
|
|
[ongoing discussion][put_delete] about adding support for `PUT` and `DELETE`,
|
|
as well as how to support content types other than form-encoded data.
|
|
|
|
[cite]: http://www.amazon.com/Restful-Web-Services-Leonard-Richardson/dp/0596529260
|
|
[rails]: http://guides.rubyonrails.org/form_helpers.html#how-do-forms-with-put-or-delete-methods-work
|
|
[html5]: http://www.w3.org/TR/html5-diff/#changes-2010-06-24
|
|
[put_delete]: http://amundsen.com/examples/put-delete-forms/
|
|
[aws_elb]: https://forums.aws.amazon.com/thread.jspa?messageID=400724
|