mirror of
https://github.com/explosion/spaCy.git
synced 2024-12-27 10:26:35 +03:00
657af5f91f
* 🚨 Ignore all existing Mypy errors * 🏗 Add Mypy check to CI * Add types-mock and types-requests as dev requirements * Add additional type ignore directives * Add types packages to dev-only list in reqs test * Add types-dataclasses for python 3.6 * Add ignore to pretrain * 🏷 Improve type annotation on `run_command` helper The `run_command` helper previously declared that it returned an `Optional[subprocess.CompletedProcess]`, but it isn't actually possible for the function to return `None`. These changes modify the type annotation of the `run_command` helper and remove all now-unnecessary `# type: ignore` directives. * 🔧 Allow variable type redefinition in limited contexts These changes modify how Mypy is configured to allow variables to have their type automatically redefined under certain conditions. The Mypy documentation contains the following example: ```python def process(items: List[str]) -> None: # 'items' has type List[str] items = [item.split() for item in items] # 'items' now has type List[List[str]] ... ``` This configuration change is especially helpful in reducing the number of `# type: ignore` directives needed to handle the common pattern of: * Accepting a filepath as a string * Overwriting the variable using `filepath = ensure_path(filepath)` These changes enable redefinition and remove all `# type: ignore` directives rendered redundant by this change. * 🏷 Add type annotation to converters mapping * 🚨 Fix Mypy error in convert CLI argument verification * 🏷 Improve type annotation on `resolve_dot_names` helper * 🏷 Add type annotations for `Vocab` attributes `strings` and `vectors` * 🏷 Add type annotations for more `Vocab` attributes * 🏷 Add loose type annotation for gold data compilation * 🏷 Improve `_format_labels` type annotation * 🏷 Fix `get_lang_class` type annotation * 🏷 Loosen return type of `Language.evaluate` * 🏷 Don't accept `Scorer` in `handle_scores_per_type` * 🏷 Add `string_to_list` overloads * 🏷 Fix non-Optional command-line options * 🙈 Ignore redefinition of `wandb_logger` in `loggers.py` * ➕ Install `typing_extensions` in Python 3.8+ The `typing_extensions` package states that it should be used when "writing code that must be compatible with multiple Python versions". Since SpaCy needs to support multiple Python versions, it should be used when newer `typing` module members are required. One example of this is `Literal`, which is available starting with Python 3.8. Previously SpaCy tried to import `Literal` from `typing`, falling back to `typing_extensions` if the import failed. However, Mypy doesn't seem to be able to understand what `Literal` means when the initial import means. Therefore, these changes modify how `compat` imports `Literal` by always importing it from `typing_extensions`. These changes also modify how `typing_extensions` is installed, so that it is a requirement for all Python versions, including those greater than or equal to 3.8. * 🏷 Improve type annotation for `Language.pipe` These changes add a missing overload variant to the type signature of `Language.pipe`. Additionally, the type signature is enhanced to allow type checkers to differentiate between the two overload variants based on the `as_tuple` parameter. Fixes #8772 * ➖ Don't install `typing-extensions` in Python 3.8+ After more detailed analysis of how to implement Python version-specific type annotations using SpaCy, it has been determined that by branching on a comparison against `sys.version_info` can be statically analyzed by Mypy well enough to enable us to conditionally use `typing_extensions.Literal`. This means that we no longer need to install `typing_extensions` for Python versions greater than or equal to 3.8! 🎉 These changes revert previous changes installing `typing-extensions` regardless of Python version and modify how we import the `Literal` type to ensure that Mypy treats it properly. * resolve mypy errors for Strict pydantic types * refactor code to avoid missing return statement * fix types of convert CLI command * avoid list-set confustion in debug_data * fix typo and formatting * small fixes to avoid type ignores * fix types in profile CLI command and make it more efficient * type fixes in projects CLI * put one ignore back * type fixes for render * fix render types - the sequel * fix BaseDefault in language definitions * fix type of noun_chunks iterator - yields tuple instead of span * fix types in language-specific modules * 🏷 Expand accepted inputs of `get_string_id` `get_string_id` accepts either a string (in which case it returns its ID) or an ID (in which case it immediately returns the ID). These changes extend the type annotation of `get_string_id` to indicate that it can accept either strings or IDs. * 🏷 Handle override types in `combine_score_weights` The `combine_score_weights` function allows users to pass an `overrides` mapping to override data extracted from the `weights` argument. Since it allows `Optional` dictionary values, the return value may also include `Optional` dictionary values. These changes update the type annotations for `combine_score_weights` to reflect this fact. * 🏷 Fix tokenizer serialization method signatures in `DummyTokenizer` * 🏷 Fix redefinition of `wandb_logger` These changes fix the redefinition of `wandb_logger` by giving a separate name to each `WandbLogger` version. For backwards-compatibility, `spacy.train` still exports `wandb_logger_v3` as `wandb_logger` for now. * more fixes for typing in language * type fixes in model definitions * 🏷 Annotate `_RandomWords.probs` as `NDArray` * 🏷 Annotate `tok2vec` layers to help Mypy * 🐛 Fix `_RandomWords.probs` type annotations for Python 3.6 Also remove an import that I forgot to move to the top of the module 😅 * more fixes for matchers and other pipeline components * quick fix for entity linker * fixing types for spancat, textcat, etc * bugfix for tok2vec * type annotations for scorer * add runtime_checkable for Protocol * type and import fixes in tests * mypy fixes for training utilities * few fixes in util * fix import * 🐵 Remove unused `# type: ignore` directives * 🏷 Annotate `Language._components` * 🏷 Annotate `spacy.pipeline.Pipe` * add doc as property to span.pyi * small fixes and cleanup * explicit type annotations instead of via comment Co-authored-by: Adriane Boyd <adrianeboyd@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: svlandeg <sofie.vanlandeghem@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: svlandeg <svlandeg@github.com>
1054 lines
37 KiB
Markdown
1054 lines
37 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
title: Layers and Model Architectures
|
||
teaser: Power spaCy components with custom neural networks
|
||
menu:
|
||
- ['Type Signatures', 'type-sigs']
|
||
- ['Swapping Architectures', 'swap-architectures']
|
||
- ['PyTorch & TensorFlow', 'frameworks']
|
||
- ['Custom Thinc Models', 'thinc']
|
||
- ['Trainable Components', 'components']
|
||
next: /usage/projects
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
> #### Example
|
||
>
|
||
> ```python
|
||
> from thinc.api import Model, chain
|
||
>
|
||
> @spacy.registry.architectures("model.v1")
|
||
> def build_model(width: int, classes: int) -> Model:
|
||
> tok2vec = build_tok2vec(width)
|
||
> output_layer = build_output_layer(width, classes)
|
||
> model = chain(tok2vec, output_layer)
|
||
> return model
|
||
> ```
|
||
|
||
A **model architecture** is a function that wires up a
|
||
[Thinc `Model`](https://thinc.ai/docs/api-model) instance. It describes the
|
||
neural network that is run internally as part of a component in a spaCy
|
||
pipeline. To define the actual architecture, you can implement your logic in
|
||
Thinc directly, or you can use Thinc as a thin wrapper around frameworks such as
|
||
PyTorch, TensorFlow and MXNet. Each `Model` can also be used as a sublayer of a
|
||
larger network, allowing you to freely combine implementations from different
|
||
frameworks into a single model.
|
||
|
||
spaCy's built-in components require a `Model` instance to be passed to them via
|
||
the config system. To change the model architecture of an existing component,
|
||
you just need to [**update the config**](#swap-architectures) so that it refers
|
||
to a different registered function. Once the component has been created from
|
||
this config, you won't be able to change it anymore. The architecture is like a
|
||
recipe for the network, and you can't change the recipe once the dish has
|
||
already been prepared. You have to make a new one.
|
||
|
||
```ini
|
||
### config.cfg (excerpt)
|
||
[components.tagger]
|
||
factory = "tagger"
|
||
|
||
[components.tagger.model]
|
||
@architectures = "model.v1"
|
||
width = 512
|
||
classes = 16
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## Type signatures {#type-sigs}
|
||
|
||
> #### Example
|
||
>
|
||
> ```python
|
||
> from typing import List
|
||
> from thinc.api import Model, chain
|
||
> from thinc.types import Floats2d
|
||
> def chain_model(
|
||
> tok2vec: Model[List[Doc], List[Floats2d]],
|
||
> layer1: Model[List[Floats2d], Floats2d],
|
||
> layer2: Model[Floats2d, Floats2d]
|
||
> ) -> Model[List[Doc], Floats2d]:
|
||
> model = chain(tok2vec, layer1, layer2)
|
||
> return model
|
||
> ```
|
||
|
||
The Thinc `Model` class is a **generic type** that can specify its input and
|
||
output types. Python uses a square-bracket notation for this, so the type
|
||
~~Model[List, Dict]~~ says that each batch of inputs to the model will be a
|
||
list, and the outputs will be a dictionary. You can be even more specific and
|
||
write for instance~~Model[List[Doc], Dict[str, float]]~~ to specify that the
|
||
model expects a list of [`Doc`](/api/doc) objects as input, and returns a
|
||
dictionary mapping of strings to floats. Some of the most common types you'll
|
||
see are:
|
||
|
||
| Type | Description |
|
||
| ------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
||
| ~~List[Doc]~~ | A batch of [`Doc`](/api/doc) objects. Most components expect their models to take this as input. |
|
||
| ~~Floats2d~~ | A two-dimensional `numpy` or `cupy` array of floats. Usually 32-bit. |
|
||
| ~~Ints2d~~ | A two-dimensional `numpy` or `cupy` array of integers. Common dtypes include uint64, int32 and int8. |
|
||
| ~~List[Floats2d]~~ | A list of two-dimensional arrays, generally with one array per `Doc` and one row per token. |
|
||
| ~~Ragged~~ | A container to handle variable-length sequence data in an unpadded contiguous array. |
|
||
| ~~Padded~~ | A container to handle variable-length sequence data in a padded contiguous array. |
|
||
|
||
See the [Thinc type reference](https://thinc.ai/docs/api-types) for details. The
|
||
model type signatures help you figure out which model architectures and
|
||
components can **fit together**. For instance, the
|
||
[`TextCategorizer`](/api/textcategorizer) class expects a model typed
|
||
~~Model[List[Doc], Floats2d]~~, because the model will predict one row of
|
||
category probabilities per [`Doc`](/api/doc). In contrast, the
|
||
[`Tagger`](/api/tagger) class expects a model typed ~~Model[List[Doc],
|
||
List[Floats2d]]~~, because it needs to predict one row of probabilities per
|
||
token.
|
||
|
||
There's no guarantee that two models with the same type signature can be used
|
||
interchangeably. There are many other ways they could be incompatible. However,
|
||
if the types don't match, they almost surely _won't_ be compatible. This little
|
||
bit of validation goes a long way, especially if you
|
||
[configure your editor](https://thinc.ai/docs/usage-type-checking) or other
|
||
tools to highlight these errors early. The config file is also validated at the
|
||
beginning of training, to verify that all the types match correctly.
|
||
|
||
<Accordion title="Tip: Static type checking in your editor">
|
||
|
||
If you're using a modern editor like Visual Studio Code, you can
|
||
[set up `mypy`](https://thinc.ai/docs/usage-type-checking#install) with the
|
||
custom Thinc plugin and get live feedback about mismatched types as you write
|
||
code.
|
||
|
||
[![](../images/thinc_mypy.jpg)](https://thinc.ai/docs/usage-type-checking#linting)
|
||
|
||
</Accordion>
|
||
|
||
## Swapping model architectures {#swap-architectures}
|
||
|
||
If no model is specified for the [`TextCategorizer`](/api/textcategorizer), the
|
||
[TextCatEnsemble](/api/architectures#TextCatEnsemble) architecture is used by
|
||
default. This architecture combines a simple bag-of-words model with a neural
|
||
network, usually resulting in the most accurate results, but at the cost of
|
||
speed. The config file for this model would look something like this:
|
||
|
||
```ini
|
||
### config.cfg (excerpt)
|
||
[components.textcat]
|
||
factory = "textcat"
|
||
labels = []
|
||
|
||
[components.textcat.model]
|
||
@architectures = "spacy.TextCatEnsemble.v2"
|
||
nO = null
|
||
|
||
[components.textcat.model.tok2vec]
|
||
@architectures = "spacy.Tok2Vec.v2"
|
||
|
||
[components.textcat.model.tok2vec.embed]
|
||
@architectures = "spacy.MultiHashEmbed.v2"
|
||
width = 64
|
||
rows = [2000, 2000, 1000, 1000, 1000, 1000]
|
||
attrs = ["ORTH", "LOWER", "PREFIX", "SUFFIX", "SHAPE", "ID"]
|
||
include_static_vectors = false
|
||
|
||
[components.textcat.model.tok2vec.encode]
|
||
@architectures = "spacy.MaxoutWindowEncoder.v2"
|
||
width = ${components.textcat.model.tok2vec.embed.width}
|
||
window_size = 1
|
||
maxout_pieces = 3
|
||
depth = 2
|
||
|
||
[components.textcat.model.linear_model]
|
||
@architectures = "spacy.TextCatBOW.v2"
|
||
exclusive_classes = true
|
||
ngram_size = 1
|
||
no_output_layer = false
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
spaCy has two additional built-in `textcat` architectures, and you can easily
|
||
use those by swapping out the definition of the textcat's model. For instance,
|
||
to use the simple and fast bag-of-words model
|
||
[TextCatBOW](/api/architectures#TextCatBOW), you can change the config to:
|
||
|
||
```ini
|
||
### config.cfg (excerpt) {highlight="6-10"}
|
||
[components.textcat]
|
||
factory = "textcat"
|
||
labels = []
|
||
|
||
[components.textcat.model]
|
||
@architectures = "spacy.TextCatBOW.v2"
|
||
exclusive_classes = true
|
||
ngram_size = 1
|
||
no_output_layer = false
|
||
nO = null
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
For details on all pre-defined architectures shipped with spaCy and how to
|
||
configure them, check out the [model architectures](/api/architectures)
|
||
documentation.
|
||
|
||
### Defining sublayers {#sublayers}
|
||
|
||
Model architecture functions often accept **sublayers as arguments**, so that
|
||
you can try **substituting a different layer** into the network. Depending on
|
||
how the architecture function is structured, you might be able to define your
|
||
network structure entirely through the [config system](/usage/training#config),
|
||
using layers that have already been defined.
|
||
|
||
In most neural network models for NLP, the most important parts of the network
|
||
are what we refer to as the
|
||
[embed and encode](https://explosion.ai/blog/deep-learning-formula-nlp) steps.
|
||
These steps together compute dense, context-sensitive representations of the
|
||
tokens, and their combination forms a typical
|
||
[`Tok2Vec`](/api/architectures#Tok2Vec) layer:
|
||
|
||
```ini
|
||
### config.cfg (excerpt)
|
||
[components.tok2vec]
|
||
factory = "tok2vec"
|
||
|
||
[components.tok2vec.model]
|
||
@architectures = "spacy.Tok2Vec.v2"
|
||
|
||
[components.tok2vec.model.embed]
|
||
@architectures = "spacy.MultiHashEmbed.v2"
|
||
# ...
|
||
|
||
[components.tok2vec.model.encode]
|
||
@architectures = "spacy.MaxoutWindowEncoder.v2"
|
||
# ...
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
By defining these sublayers specifically, it becomes straightforward to swap out
|
||
a sublayer for another one, for instance changing the first sublayer to a
|
||
character embedding with the [CharacterEmbed](/api/architectures#CharacterEmbed)
|
||
architecture:
|
||
|
||
```ini
|
||
### config.cfg (excerpt)
|
||
[components.tok2vec.model.embed]
|
||
@architectures = "spacy.CharacterEmbed.v2"
|
||
# ...
|
||
|
||
[components.tok2vec.model.encode]
|
||
@architectures = "spacy.MaxoutWindowEncoder.v2"
|
||
# ...
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
Most of spaCy's default architectures accept a `tok2vec` layer as a sublayer
|
||
within the larger task-specific neural network. This makes it easy to **switch
|
||
between** transformer, CNN, BiLSTM or other feature extraction approaches. The
|
||
[transformers documentation](/usage/embeddings-transformers#training-custom-model)
|
||
section shows an example of swapping out a model's standard `tok2vec` layer with
|
||
a transformer. And if you want to define your own solution, all you need to do
|
||
is register a ~~Model[List[Doc], List[Floats2d]]~~ architecture function, and
|
||
you'll be able to try it out in any of the spaCy components.
|
||
|
||
## Wrapping PyTorch, TensorFlow and other frameworks {#frameworks}
|
||
|
||
Thinc allows you to [wrap models](https://thinc.ai/docs/usage-frameworks)
|
||
written in other machine learning frameworks like PyTorch, TensorFlow and MXNet
|
||
using a unified [`Model`](https://thinc.ai/docs/api-model) API. This makes it
|
||
easy to use a model implemented in a different framework to power a component in
|
||
your spaCy pipeline. For example, to wrap a PyTorch model as a Thinc `Model`,
|
||
you can use Thinc's
|
||
[`PyTorchWrapper`](https://thinc.ai/docs/api-layers#pytorchwrapper):
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
from thinc.api import PyTorchWrapper
|
||
|
||
wrapped_pt_model = PyTorchWrapper(torch_model)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
Let's use PyTorch to define a very simple neural network consisting of two
|
||
hidden `Linear` layers with `ReLU` activation and dropout, and a
|
||
softmax-activated output layer:
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
### PyTorch model
|
||
from torch import nn
|
||
|
||
torch_model = nn.Sequential(
|
||
nn.Linear(width, hidden_width),
|
||
nn.ReLU(),
|
||
nn.Dropout2d(dropout),
|
||
nn.Linear(hidden_width, nO),
|
||
nn.ReLU(),
|
||
nn.Dropout2d(dropout),
|
||
nn.Softmax(dim=1)
|
||
)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
The resulting wrapped `Model` can be used as a **custom architecture** as such,
|
||
or can be a **subcomponent of a larger model**. For instance, we can use Thinc's
|
||
[`chain`](https://thinc.ai/docs/api-layers#chain) combinator, which works like
|
||
`Sequential` in PyTorch, to combine the wrapped model with other components in a
|
||
larger network. This effectively means that you can easily wrap different
|
||
components from different frameworks, and "glue" them together with Thinc:
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
from thinc.api import chain, with_array, PyTorchWrapper
|
||
from spacy.ml import CharacterEmbed
|
||
|
||
wrapped_pt_model = PyTorchWrapper(torch_model)
|
||
char_embed = CharacterEmbed(width, embed_size, nM, nC)
|
||
model = chain(char_embed, with_array(wrapped_pt_model))
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
In the above example, we have combined our custom PyTorch model with a character
|
||
embedding layer defined by spaCy.
|
||
[CharacterEmbed](/api/architectures#CharacterEmbed) returns a `Model` that takes
|
||
a ~~List[Doc]~~ as input, and outputs a ~~List[Floats2d]~~. To make sure that
|
||
the wrapped PyTorch model receives valid inputs, we use Thinc's
|
||
[`with_array`](https://thinc.ai/docs/api-layers#with_array) helper.
|
||
|
||
You could also implement a model that only uses PyTorch for the transformer
|
||
layers, and "native" Thinc layers to do fiddly input and output transformations
|
||
and add on task-specific "heads", as efficiency is less of a consideration for
|
||
those parts of the network.
|
||
|
||
### Using wrapped models {#frameworks-usage}
|
||
|
||
To use our custom model including the PyTorch subnetwork, all we need to do is
|
||
register the architecture using the
|
||
[`architectures` registry](/api/top-level#registry). This assigns the
|
||
architecture a name so spaCy knows how to find it, and allows passing in
|
||
arguments like hyperparameters via the [config](/usage/training#config). The
|
||
full example then becomes:
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
### Registering the architecture {highlight="9"}
|
||
from typing import List
|
||
from thinc.types import Floats2d
|
||
from thinc.api import Model, PyTorchWrapper, chain, with_array
|
||
import spacy
|
||
from spacy.tokens.doc import Doc
|
||
from spacy.ml import CharacterEmbed
|
||
from torch import nn
|
||
|
||
@spacy.registry.architectures("CustomTorchModel.v1")
|
||
def create_torch_model(
|
||
nO: int,
|
||
width: int,
|
||
hidden_width: int,
|
||
embed_size: int,
|
||
nM: int,
|
||
nC: int,
|
||
dropout: float,
|
||
) -> Model[List[Doc], List[Floats2d]]:
|
||
char_embed = CharacterEmbed(width, embed_size, nM, nC)
|
||
torch_model = nn.Sequential(
|
||
nn.Linear(width, hidden_width),
|
||
nn.ReLU(),
|
||
nn.Dropout2d(dropout),
|
||
nn.Linear(hidden_width, nO),
|
||
nn.ReLU(),
|
||
nn.Dropout2d(dropout),
|
||
nn.Softmax(dim=1)
|
||
)
|
||
wrapped_pt_model = PyTorchWrapper(torch_model)
|
||
model = chain(char_embed, with_array(wrapped_pt_model))
|
||
return model
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
The model definition can now be used in any existing trainable spaCy component,
|
||
by specifying it in the config file. In this configuration, all required
|
||
parameters for the various subcomponents of the custom architecture are passed
|
||
in as settings via the config.
|
||
|
||
```ini
|
||
### config.cfg (excerpt) {highlight="5-5"}
|
||
[components.tagger]
|
||
factory = "tagger"
|
||
|
||
[components.tagger.model]
|
||
@architectures = "CustomTorchModel.v1"
|
||
nO = 50
|
||
width = 96
|
||
hidden_width = 48
|
||
embed_size = 2000
|
||
nM = 64
|
||
nC = 8
|
||
dropout = 0.2
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
<Infobox variant="warning">
|
||
|
||
Remember that it is best not to rely on any (hidden) default values to ensure
|
||
that training configs are complete and experiments fully reproducible.
|
||
|
||
</Infobox>
|
||
|
||
Note that when using a PyTorch or Tensorflow model, it is recommended to set the
|
||
GPU memory allocator accordingly. When `gpu_allocator` is set to "pytorch" or
|
||
"tensorflow" in the training config, cupy will allocate memory via those
|
||
respective libraries, preventing OOM errors when there's available memory
|
||
sitting in the other library's pool.
|
||
|
||
```ini
|
||
### config.cfg (excerpt)
|
||
[training]
|
||
gpu_allocator = "pytorch"
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## Custom models with Thinc {#thinc}
|
||
|
||
Of course it's also possible to define the `Model` from the previous section
|
||
entirely in Thinc. The Thinc documentation provides details on the
|
||
[various layers](https://thinc.ai/docs/api-layers) and helper functions
|
||
available. Combinators can be used to
|
||
[overload operators](https://thinc.ai/docs/usage-models#operators) and a common
|
||
usage pattern is to bind `chain` to `>>`. The "native" Thinc version of our
|
||
simple neural network would then become:
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
from thinc.api import chain, with_array, Model, Relu, Dropout, Softmax
|
||
from spacy.ml import CharacterEmbed
|
||
|
||
char_embed = CharacterEmbed(width, embed_size, nM, nC)
|
||
with Model.define_operators({">>": chain}):
|
||
layers = (
|
||
Relu(hidden_width, width)
|
||
>> Dropout(dropout)
|
||
>> Relu(hidden_width, hidden_width)
|
||
>> Dropout(dropout)
|
||
>> Softmax(nO, hidden_width)
|
||
)
|
||
model = char_embed >> with_array(layers)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
<Infobox variant="warning" title="Important note on inputs and outputs">
|
||
|
||
Note that Thinc layers define the output dimension (`nO`) as the first argument,
|
||
followed (optionally) by the input dimension (`nI`). This is in contrast to how
|
||
the PyTorch layers are defined, where `in_features` precedes `out_features`.
|
||
|
||
</Infobox>
|
||
|
||
### Shape inference in Thinc {#thinc-shape-inference}
|
||
|
||
It is **not** strictly necessary to define all the input and output dimensions
|
||
for each layer, as Thinc can perform
|
||
[shape inference](https://thinc.ai/docs/usage-models#validation) between
|
||
sequential layers by matching up the output dimensionality of one layer to the
|
||
input dimensionality of the next. This means that we can simplify the `layers`
|
||
definition:
|
||
|
||
> #### Diff
|
||
>
|
||
> ```diff
|
||
> layers = (
|
||
> Relu(hidden_width, width)
|
||
> >> Dropout(dropout)
|
||
> - >> Relu(hidden_width, hidden_width)
|
||
> + >> Relu(hidden_width)
|
||
> >> Dropout(dropout)
|
||
> - >> Softmax(nO, hidden_width)
|
||
> + >> Softmax(nO)
|
||
> )
|
||
> ```
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
with Model.define_operators({">>": chain}):
|
||
layers = (
|
||
Relu(hidden_width, width)
|
||
>> Dropout(dropout)
|
||
>> Relu(hidden_width)
|
||
>> Dropout(dropout)
|
||
>> Softmax(nO)
|
||
)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
Thinc can even go one step further and **deduce the correct input dimension** of
|
||
the first layer, and output dimension of the last. To enable this functionality,
|
||
you have to call
|
||
[`Model.initialize`](https://thinc.ai/docs/api-model#initialize) with an **input
|
||
sample** `X` and an **output sample** `Y` with the correct dimensions:
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
### Shape inference with initialization {highlight="3,7,10"}
|
||
with Model.define_operators({">>": chain}):
|
||
layers = (
|
||
Relu(hidden_width)
|
||
>> Dropout(dropout)
|
||
>> Relu(hidden_width)
|
||
>> Dropout(dropout)
|
||
>> Softmax()
|
||
)
|
||
model = char_embed >> with_array(layers)
|
||
model.initialize(X=input_sample, Y=output_sample)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
The built-in [pipeline components](/usage/processing-pipelines) in spaCy ensure
|
||
that their internal models are **always initialized** with appropriate sample
|
||
data. In this case, `X` is typically a ~~List[Doc]~~, while `Y` is typically a
|
||
~~List[Array1d]~~ or ~~List[Array2d]~~, depending on the specific task. This
|
||
functionality is triggered when [`nlp.initialize`](/api/language#initialize) is
|
||
called.
|
||
|
||
### Dropout and normalization in Thinc {#thinc-dropout-norm}
|
||
|
||
Many of the available Thinc [layers](https://thinc.ai/docs/api-layers) allow you
|
||
to define a `dropout` argument that will result in "chaining" an additional
|
||
[`Dropout`](https://thinc.ai/docs/api-layers#dropout) layer. Optionally, you can
|
||
often specify whether or not you want to add layer normalization, which would
|
||
result in an additional
|
||
[`LayerNorm`](https://thinc.ai/docs/api-layers#layernorm) layer. That means that
|
||
the following `layers` definition is equivalent to the previous:
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
with Model.define_operators({">>": chain}):
|
||
layers = (
|
||
Relu(hidden_width, dropout=dropout, normalize=False)
|
||
>> Relu(hidden_width, dropout=dropout, normalize=False)
|
||
>> Softmax()
|
||
)
|
||
model = char_embed >> with_array(layers)
|
||
model.initialize(X=input_sample, Y=output_sample)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## Create new trainable components {#components}
|
||
|
||
In addition to [swapping out](#swap-architectures) layers in existing
|
||
components, you can also implement an entirely new,
|
||
[trainable](/usage/processing-pipelines#trainable-components) pipeline component
|
||
from scratch. This can be done by creating a new class inheriting from
|
||
[`TrainablePipe`](/api/pipe), and linking it up to your custom model
|
||
implementation.
|
||
|
||
<Infobox title="Trainable component API" emoji="💡">
|
||
|
||
For details on how to implement pipeline components, check out the usage guide
|
||
on [custom components](/usage/processing-pipelines#custom-component) and the
|
||
overview of the `TrainablePipe` methods used by
|
||
[trainable components](/usage/processing-pipelines#trainable-components).
|
||
|
||
</Infobox>
|
||
|
||
### Example: Entity relation extraction component {#component-rel}
|
||
|
||
This section outlines an example use-case of implementing a **novel relation
|
||
extraction component** from scratch. We'll implement a binary relation
|
||
extraction method that determines whether or not **two entities** in a document
|
||
are related, and if so, what type of relation connects them. We allow multiple
|
||
types of relations between two such entities (a multi-label setting). There are
|
||
two major steps required:
|
||
|
||
1. Implement a [machine learning model](#component-rel-model) specific to this
|
||
task. It will have to extract candidate relation instances from a
|
||
[`Doc`](/api/doc) and predict the corresponding scores for each relation
|
||
label.
|
||
2. Implement a custom [pipeline component](#component-rel-pipe) - powered by the
|
||
machine learning model from step 1 - that translates the predicted scores
|
||
into annotations that are stored on the [`Doc`](/api/doc) objects as they
|
||
pass through the `nlp` pipeline.
|
||
|
||
<Project id="tutorials/rel_component">
|
||
Run this example use-case by using our project template. It includes all the
|
||
code to create the ML model and the pipeline component from scratch.
|
||
It also contains two config files to train the model:
|
||
one to run on CPU with a Tok2Vec layer, and one for the GPU using a transformer.
|
||
The project applies the relation extraction component to identify biomolecular
|
||
interactions in a sample dataset, but you can easily swap in your own dataset
|
||
for your experiments in any other domain.
|
||
</Project>
|
||
|
||
<YouTube id="8HL-Ap5_Axo"></YouTube>
|
||
|
||
#### Step 1: Implementing the Model {#component-rel-model}
|
||
|
||
We need to implement a [`Model`](https://thinc.ai/docs/api-model) that takes a
|
||
**list of documents** (~~List[Doc]~~) as input, and outputs a **two-dimensional
|
||
matrix** (~~Floats2d~~) of predictions:
|
||
|
||
> #### Model type annotations
|
||
>
|
||
> The `Model` class is a generic type that can specify its input and output
|
||
> types, e.g. ~~Model[List[Doc], Floats2d]~~. Type hints are used for static
|
||
> type checks and validation. See the section on [type signatures](#type-sigs)
|
||
> for details.
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
### The model architecture
|
||
@spacy.registry.architectures("rel_model.v1")
|
||
def create_relation_model(...) -> Model[List[Doc], Floats2d]:
|
||
model = ... # 👈 model will go here
|
||
return model
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
We adapt a **modular approach** to the definition of this relation model, and
|
||
define it as chaining two layers together: the first layer that generates an
|
||
instance tensor from a given set of documents, and the second layer that
|
||
transforms the instance tensor into a final tensor holding the predictions:
|
||
|
||
> #### config.cfg (excerpt)
|
||
>
|
||
> ```ini
|
||
> [model]
|
||
> @architectures = "rel_model.v1"
|
||
>
|
||
> [model.create_instance_tensor]
|
||
> # ...
|
||
>
|
||
> [model.classification_layer]
|
||
> # ...
|
||
> ```
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
### The model architecture {highlight="6"}
|
||
@spacy.registry.architectures("rel_model.v1")
|
||
def create_relation_model(
|
||
create_instance_tensor: Model[List[Doc], Floats2d],
|
||
classification_layer: Model[Floats2d, Floats2d],
|
||
) -> Model[List[Doc], Floats2d]:
|
||
model = chain(create_instance_tensor, classification_layer)
|
||
return model
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
The `classification_layer` could be something like a
|
||
[Linear](https://thinc.ai/docs/api-layers#linear) layer followed by a
|
||
[logistic](https://thinc.ai/docs/api-layers#logistic) activation function:
|
||
|
||
> #### config.cfg (excerpt)
|
||
>
|
||
> ```ini
|
||
> [model.classification_layer]
|
||
> @architectures = "rel_classification_layer.v1"
|
||
> nI = null
|
||
> nO = null
|
||
> ```
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
### The classification layer
|
||
@spacy.registry.architectures("rel_classification_layer.v1")
|
||
def create_classification_layer(
|
||
nO: int = None, nI: int = None
|
||
) -> Model[Floats2d, Floats2d]:
|
||
return chain(Linear(nO=nO, nI=nI), Logistic())
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
The first layer that **creates the instance tensor** can be defined by
|
||
implementing a
|
||
[custom forward function](https://thinc.ai/docs/usage-models#weights-layers-forward)
|
||
with an appropriate backpropagation callback. We also define an
|
||
[initialization method](https://thinc.ai/docs/usage-models#weights-layers-init)
|
||
that ensures that the layer is properly set up for training.
|
||
|
||
We omit some of the implementation details here, and refer to the
|
||
[spaCy project](https://github.com/explosion/projects/tree/v3/tutorials/rel_component)
|
||
that has the full implementation.
|
||
|
||
> #### config.cfg (excerpt)
|
||
>
|
||
> ```ini
|
||
> [model.create_instance_tensor]
|
||
> @architectures = "rel_instance_tensor.v1"
|
||
>
|
||
> [model.create_instance_tensor.tok2vec]
|
||
> @architectures = "spacy.HashEmbedCNN.v2"
|
||
> # ...
|
||
>
|
||
> [model.create_instance_tensor.pooling]
|
||
> @layers = "reduce_mean.v1"
|
||
>
|
||
> [model.create_instance_tensor.get_instances]
|
||
> # ...
|
||
> ```
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
### The layer that creates the instance tensor
|
||
@spacy.registry.architectures("rel_instance_tensor.v1")
|
||
def create_tensors(
|
||
tok2vec: Model[List[Doc], List[Floats2d]],
|
||
pooling: Model[Ragged, Floats2d],
|
||
get_instances: Callable[[Doc], List[Tuple[Span, Span]]],
|
||
) -> Model[List[Doc], Floats2d]:
|
||
|
||
return Model(
|
||
"instance_tensors",
|
||
instance_forward,
|
||
init=instance_init,
|
||
layers=[tok2vec, pooling],
|
||
refs={"tok2vec": tok2vec, "pooling": pooling},
|
||
attrs={"get_instances": get_instances},
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
|
||
# The custom forward function
|
||
def instance_forward(
|
||
model: Model[List[Doc], Floats2d],
|
||
docs: List[Doc],
|
||
is_train: bool,
|
||
) -> Tuple[Floats2d, Callable]:
|
||
tok2vec = model.get_ref("tok2vec")
|
||
tokvecs, bp_tokvecs = tok2vec(docs, is_train)
|
||
get_instances = model.attrs["get_instances"]
|
||
all_instances = [get_instances(doc) for doc in docs]
|
||
pooling = model.get_ref("pooling")
|
||
relations = ...
|
||
|
||
def backprop(d_relations: Floats2d) -> List[Doc]:
|
||
d_tokvecs = ...
|
||
return bp_tokvecs(d_tokvecs)
|
||
|
||
return relations, backprop
|
||
|
||
|
||
# The custom initialization method
|
||
def instance_init(
|
||
model: Model,
|
||
X: List[Doc] = None,
|
||
Y: Floats2d = None,
|
||
) -> Model:
|
||
tok2vec = model.get_ref("tok2vec")
|
||
tok2vec.initialize(X)
|
||
return model
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
This custom layer uses an [embedding layer](/usage/embeddings-transformers) such
|
||
as a [`Tok2Vec`](/api/tok2vec) component or a [`Transformer`](/api/transformer).
|
||
This layer is assumed to be of type ~~Model[List[Doc], List[Floats2d]]~~ as it
|
||
transforms each **document into a list of tokens**, with each token being
|
||
represented by its embedding in the vector space.
|
||
|
||
The `pooling` layer will be applied to summarize the token vectors into **entity
|
||
vectors**, as named entities (represented by ~~Span~~ objects) can consist of
|
||
one or multiple tokens. For instance, the pooling layer could resort to
|
||
calculating the average of all token vectors in an entity. Thinc provides
|
||
several
|
||
[built-in pooling operators](https://thinc.ai/docs/api-layers#reduction-ops) for
|
||
this purpose.
|
||
|
||
Finally, we need a `get_instances` method that **generates pairs of entities**
|
||
that we want to classify as being related or not. As these candidate pairs are
|
||
typically formed within one document, this function takes a [`Doc`](/api/doc) as
|
||
input and outputs a `List` of `Span` tuples. For instance, the following
|
||
implementation takes any two entities from the same document, as long as they
|
||
are within a **maximum distance** (in number of tokens) of each other:
|
||
|
||
> #### config.cfg (excerpt)
|
||
>
|
||
> ```ini
|
||
>
|
||
> [model.create_instance_tensor.get_instances]
|
||
> @misc = "rel_instance_generator.v1"
|
||
> max_length = 100
|
||
> ```
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
### Candidate generation
|
||
@spacy.registry.misc("rel_instance_generator.v1")
|
||
def create_instances(max_length: int) -> Callable[[Doc], List[Tuple[Span, Span]]]:
|
||
def get_candidates(doc: "Doc") -> List[Tuple[Span, Span]]:
|
||
candidates = []
|
||
for ent1 in doc.ents:
|
||
for ent2 in doc.ents:
|
||
if ent1 != ent2:
|
||
if max_length and abs(ent2.start - ent1.start) <= max_length:
|
||
candidates.append((ent1, ent2))
|
||
return candidates
|
||
return get_candidates
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
This function is added to the [`@misc` registry](/api/top-level#registry) so we
|
||
can refer to it from the config, and easily swap it out for any other candidate
|
||
generation function.
|
||
|
||
#### Intermezzo: define how to store the relations data {#component-rel-attribute}
|
||
|
||
> #### Example output
|
||
>
|
||
> ```python
|
||
> doc = nlp("Amsterdam is the capital of the Netherlands.")
|
||
> print("spans", [(e.start, e.text, e.label_) for e in doc.ents])
|
||
> for value, rel_dict in doc._.rel.items():
|
||
> print(f"{value}: {rel_dict}")
|
||
>
|
||
> # spans [(0, 'Amsterdam', 'LOC'), (6, 'Netherlands', 'LOC')]
|
||
> # (0, 6): {'CAPITAL_OF': 0.89, 'LOCATED_IN': 0.75, 'UNRELATED': 0.002}
|
||
> # (6, 0): {'CAPITAL_OF': 0.01, 'LOCATED_IN': 0.13, 'UNRELATED': 0.017}
|
||
> ```
|
||
|
||
For our new relation extraction component, we will use a custom
|
||
[extension attribute](/usage/processing-pipelines#custom-components-attributes)
|
||
`doc._.rel` in which we store relation data. The attribute refers to a
|
||
dictionary, keyed by the **start offsets of each entity** involved in the
|
||
candidate relation. The values in the dictionary refer to another dictionary
|
||
where relation labels are mapped to values between 0 and 1. We assume anything
|
||
above 0.5 to be a `True` relation. The ~~Example~~ instances that we'll use as
|
||
training data, will include their gold-standard relation annotations in
|
||
`example.reference._.rel`.
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
### Registering the extension attribute
|
||
from spacy.tokens import Doc
|
||
Doc.set_extension("rel", default={})
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
#### Step 2: Implementing the pipeline component {#component-rel-pipe}
|
||
|
||
To use our new relation extraction model as part of a custom
|
||
[trainable component](/usage/processing-pipelines#trainable-components), we
|
||
create a subclass of [`TrainablePipe`](/api/pipe) that holds the model.
|
||
|
||
![Illustration of Pipe methods](../images/trainable_component.svg)
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
### Pipeline component skeleton
|
||
from spacy.pipeline import TrainablePipe
|
||
|
||
class RelationExtractor(TrainablePipe):
|
||
def __init__(self, vocab, model, name="rel"):
|
||
"""Create a component instance."""
|
||
self.model = model
|
||
self.vocab = vocab
|
||
self.name = name
|
||
|
||
def update(self, examples, drop=0.0, sgd=None, losses=None):
|
||
"""Learn from a batch of Example objects."""
|
||
...
|
||
|
||
def predict(self, docs):
|
||
"""Apply the model to a batch of Doc objects."""
|
||
...
|
||
|
||
def set_annotations(self, docs, predictions):
|
||
"""Modify a batch of Doc objects using the predictions."""
|
||
...
|
||
|
||
def initialize(self, get_examples, nlp=None, labels=None):
|
||
"""Initialize the model before training."""
|
||
...
|
||
|
||
def add_label(self, label):
|
||
"""Add a label to the component."""
|
||
...
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
Typically, the **constructor** defines the vocab, the Machine Learning model,
|
||
and the name of this component. Additionally, this component, just like the
|
||
`textcat` and the `tagger`, stores an **internal list of labels**. The ML model
|
||
will predict scores for each label. We add convenience methods to easily
|
||
retrieve and add to them.
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
### The constructor (continued)
|
||
def __init__(self, vocab, model, name="rel"):
|
||
"""Create a component instance."""
|
||
# ...
|
||
self.cfg = {"labels": []}
|
||
|
||
@property
|
||
def labels(self) -> Tuple[str, ...]:
|
||
"""Returns the labels currently added to the component."""
|
||
return tuple(self.cfg["labels"])
|
||
|
||
def add_label(self, label: str):
|
||
"""Add a new label to the pipe."""
|
||
self.cfg["labels"] = list(self.labels) + [label]
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
After creation, the component needs to be
|
||
[initialized](/usage/training#initialization). This method can define the
|
||
relevant labels in two ways: explicitely by setting the `labels` argument in the
|
||
[`initialize` block](/api/data-formats#config-initialize) of the config, or
|
||
implicately by deducing them from the `get_examples` callback that generates the
|
||
full **training data set**, or a representative sample.
|
||
|
||
The final number of labels defines the output dimensionality of the network, and
|
||
will be used to do
|
||
[shape inference](https://thinc.ai/docs/usage-models#validation) throughout the
|
||
layers of the neural network. This is triggered by calling
|
||
[`Model.initialize`](https://thinc.ai/api/model#initialize).
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
### The initialize method {highlight="12,15,18,22"}
|
||
from itertools import islice
|
||
|
||
def initialize(
|
||
self,
|
||
get_examples: Callable[[], Iterable[Example]],
|
||
*,
|
||
nlp: Language = None,
|
||
labels: Optional[List[str]] = None,
|
||
):
|
||
if labels is not None:
|
||
for label in labels:
|
||
self.add_label(label)
|
||
else:
|
||
for example in get_examples():
|
||
relations = example.reference._.rel
|
||
for indices, label_dict in relations.items():
|
||
for label in label_dict.keys():
|
||
self.add_label(label)
|
||
subbatch = list(islice(get_examples(), 10))
|
||
doc_sample = [eg.reference for eg in subbatch]
|
||
label_sample = self._examples_to_truth(subbatch)
|
||
self.model.initialize(X=doc_sample, Y=label_sample)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
The `initialize` method is triggered whenever this component is part of an `nlp`
|
||
pipeline, and [`nlp.initialize`](/api/language#initialize) is invoked.
|
||
Typically, this happens when the pipeline is set up before training in
|
||
[`spacy train`](/api/cli#training). After initialization, the pipeline component
|
||
and its internal model can be trained and used to make predictions.
|
||
|
||
During training, the method [`update`](/api/pipe#update) is invoked which
|
||
delegates to
|
||
[`Model.begin_update`](https://thinc.ai/docs/api-model#begin_update) and a
|
||
[`get_loss`](/api/pipe#get_loss) function that **calculates the loss** for a
|
||
batch of examples, as well as the **gradient** of loss that will be used to
|
||
update the weights of the model layers. Thinc provides several
|
||
[loss functions](https://thinc.ai/docs/api-loss) that can be used for the
|
||
implementation of the `get_loss` function.
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
### The update method {highlight="12-14"}
|
||
def update(
|
||
self,
|
||
examples: Iterable[Example],
|
||
*,
|
||
drop: float = 0.0,
|
||
sgd: Optional[Optimizer] = None,
|
||
losses: Optional[Dict[str, float]] = None,
|
||
) -> Dict[str, float]:
|
||
# ...
|
||
docs = [eg.predicted for eg in examples]
|
||
predictions, backprop = self.model.begin_update(docs)
|
||
loss, gradient = self.get_loss(examples, predictions)
|
||
backprop(gradient)
|
||
losses[self.name] += loss
|
||
# ...
|
||
return losses
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
After training the model, the component can be used to make novel
|
||
**predictions**. The [`predict`](/api/pipe#predict) method needs to be
|
||
implemented for each subclass of `TrainablePipe`. In our case, we can simply
|
||
delegate to the internal model's
|
||
[predict](https://thinc.ai/docs/api-model#predict) function that takes a batch
|
||
of `Doc` objects and returns a ~~Floats2d~~ array:
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
### The predict method
|
||
def predict(self, docs: Iterable[Doc]) -> Floats2d:
|
||
predictions = self.model.predict(docs)
|
||
return self.model.ops.asarray(predictions)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
The final method that needs to be implemented, is
|
||
[`set_annotations`](/api/pipe#set_annotations). This function takes the
|
||
predictions, and modifies the given `Doc` object in place to store them. For our
|
||
relation extraction component, we store the data in the
|
||
[custom attribute](#component-rel-attribute)`doc._.rel`.
|
||
|
||
To interpret the scores predicted by the relation extraction model correctly, we
|
||
need to refer to the model's `get_instances` function that defined which pairs
|
||
of entities were relevant candidates, so that the predictions can be linked to
|
||
those exact entities:
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
### The set_annotations method {highlight="5-6,10"}
|
||
def set_annotations(self, docs: Iterable[Doc], predictions: Floats2d):
|
||
c = 0
|
||
get_instances = self.model.attrs["get_instances"]
|
||
for doc in docs:
|
||
for (e1, e2) in get_instances(doc):
|
||
offset = (e1.start, e2.start)
|
||
if offset not in doc._.rel:
|
||
doc._.rel[offset] = {}
|
||
for j, label in enumerate(self.labels):
|
||
doc._.rel[offset][label] = predictions[c, j]
|
||
c += 1
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
Under the hood, when the pipe is applied to a document, it delegates to the
|
||
`predict` and `set_annotations` methods:
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
### The __call__ method
|
||
def __call__(self, doc: Doc):
|
||
predictions = self.predict([doc])
|
||
self.set_annotations([doc], predictions)
|
||
return doc
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
There is one more optional method to implement: [`score`](/api/pipe#score)
|
||
calculates the performance of your component on a set of examples, and returns
|
||
the results as a dictionary:
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
### The score method
|
||
def score(self, examples: Iterable[Example]) -> Dict[str, Any]:
|
||
prf = PRFScore()
|
||
for example in examples:
|
||
...
|
||
|
||
return {
|
||
"rel_micro_p": prf.precision,
|
||
"rel_micro_r": prf.recall,
|
||
"rel_micro_f": prf.fscore,
|
||
}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
This is particularly useful for calculating relevant scores on the development
|
||
corpus when training the component with [`spacy train`](/api/cli#training).
|
||
|
||
Once our `TrainablePipe` subclass is fully implemented, we can
|
||
[register](/usage/processing-pipelines#custom-components-factories) the
|
||
component with the [`@Language.factory`](/api/language#factory) decorator. This
|
||
assigns it a name and lets you create the component with
|
||
[`nlp.add_pipe`](/api/language#add_pipe) and via the
|
||
[config](/usage/training#config).
|
||
|
||
> #### config.cfg (excerpt)
|
||
>
|
||
> ```ini
|
||
> [components.relation_extractor]
|
||
> factory = "relation_extractor"
|
||
>
|
||
> [components.relation_extractor.model]
|
||
> @architectures = "rel_model.v1"
|
||
> # ...
|
||
>
|
||
> [training.score_weights]
|
||
> rel_micro_p = 0.0
|
||
> rel_micro_r = 0.0
|
||
> rel_micro_f = 1.0
|
||
> ```
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
### Registering the pipeline component
|
||
from spacy.language import Language
|
||
|
||
@Language.factory("relation_extractor")
|
||
def make_relation_extractor(nlp, name, model):
|
||
return RelationExtractor(nlp.vocab, model, name)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
You can extend the decorator to include information such as the type of
|
||
annotations that are required for this component to run, the type of annotations
|
||
it produces, and the scores that can be calculated:
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
### Factory annotations {highlight="5-11"}
|
||
from spacy.language import Language
|
||
|
||
@Language.factory(
|
||
"relation_extractor",
|
||
requires=["doc.ents", "token.ent_iob", "token.ent_type"],
|
||
assigns=["doc._.rel"],
|
||
default_score_weights={
|
||
"rel_micro_p": None,
|
||
"rel_micro_r": None,
|
||
"rel_micro_f": None,
|
||
},
|
||
)
|
||
def make_relation_extractor(nlp, name, model):
|
||
return RelationExtractor(nlp.vocab, model, name)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
<Project id="tutorials/rel_component">
|
||
Run this example use-case by using our project template. It includes all the
|
||
code to create the ML model and the pipeline component from scratch.
|
||
It contains two config files to train the model:
|
||
one to run on CPU with a Tok2Vec layer, and one for the GPU using a transformer.
|
||
The project applies the relation extraction component to identify biomolecular
|
||
interactions, but you can easily swap in your own dataset for your experiments
|
||
in any other domain.
|
||
</Project>
|