77 KiB
title | teaser | menu | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rule-based matching | Find phrases and tokens, and match entities |
|
Compared to using regular expressions on raw text, spaCy's rule-based matcher
engines and components not only let you find the words and phrases you're
looking for – they also give you access to the tokens within the document and
their relationships. This means you can easily access and analyze the
surrounding tokens, merge spans into single tokens or add entries to the named
entities in doc.ents
.
For complex tasks, it's usually better to train a statistical entity recognition model. However, statistical models require training data, so for many situations, rule-based approaches are more practical. This is especially true at the start of a project: you can use a rule-based approach as part of a data collection process, to help you "bootstrap" a statistical model.
Training a model is useful if you have some examples and you want your system to be able to generalize based on those examples. It works especially well if there are clues in the local context. For instance, if you're trying to detect person or company names, your application may benefit from a statistical named entity recognition model.
Rule-based systems are a good choice if there's a more or less finite number of examples that you want to find in the data, or if there's a very clear, structured pattern you can express with token rules or regular expressions. For instance, country names, IP addresses or URLs are things you might be able to handle well with a purely rule-based approach.
You can also combine both approaches and improve a statistical model with rules to handle very specific cases and boost accuracy. For details, see the section on rule-based entity recognition.
The PhraseMatcher
is useful if you already have a large terminology list or
gazetteer consisting of single or multi-token phrases that you want to find
exact instances of in your data. As of spaCy v2.1.0, you can also match on the
LOWER
attribute for fast and case-insensitive matching.
The Matcher
isn't as blazing fast as the PhraseMatcher
, since it compares
across individual token attributes. However, it allows you to write very
abstract representations of the tokens you're looking for, using lexical
attributes, linguistic features predicted by the model, operators, set
membership and rich comparison. For example, you can find a noun, followed by a
verb with the lemma "love" or "like", followed by an optional determiner and
another token that's at least 10 characters long.
Token-based matching
spaCy features a rule-matching engine, the Matcher
, that
operates over tokens, similar to regular expressions. The rules can refer to
token annotations (e.g. the token text
or tag_
, and flags like IS_PUNCT
).
The rule matcher also lets you pass in a custom callback to act on matches – for
example, to merge entities and apply custom labels. You can also associate
patterns with entity IDs, to allow some basic entity linking or disambiguation.
To match large terminology lists, you can use the
PhraseMatcher
, which accepts Doc
objects as match
patterns.
Adding patterns
Let's say we want to enable spaCy to find a combination of three tokens:
- A token whose lowercase form matches "hello", e.g. "Hello" or "HELLO".
- A token whose
is_punct
flag is set toTrue
, i.e. any punctuation. - A token whose lowercase form matches "world", e.g. "World" or "WORLD".
[{"LOWER": "hello"}, {"IS_PUNCT": True}, {"LOWER": "world"}]
When writing patterns, keep in mind that each dictionary represents one token. If spaCy's tokenization doesn't match the tokens defined in a pattern, the pattern is not going to produce any results. When developing complex patterns, make sure to check examples against spaCy's tokenization:
doc = nlp("A complex-example,!")
print([token.text for token in doc])
First, we initialize the Matcher
with a vocab. The matcher must always share
the same vocab with the documents it will operate on. We can now call
matcher.add()
with an ID and a list of patterns.
### {executable="true"}
import spacy
from spacy.matcher import Matcher
nlp = spacy.load("en_core_web_sm")
matcher = Matcher(nlp.vocab)
# Add match ID "HelloWorld" with no callback and one pattern
pattern = [{"LOWER": "hello"}, {"IS_PUNCT": True}, {"LOWER": "world"}]
matcher.add("HelloWorld", [pattern])
doc = nlp("Hello, world! Hello world!")
matches = matcher(doc)
for match_id, start, end in matches:
string_id = nlp.vocab.strings[match_id] # Get string representation
span = doc[start:end] # The matched span
print(match_id, string_id, start, end, span.text)
The matcher returns a list of (match_id, start, end)
tuples – in this case,
[('15578876784678163569', 0, 3)]
, which maps to the span doc[0:3]
of our
original document. The match_id
is the hash value of
the string ID "HelloWorld". To get the string value, you can look up the ID in
the StringStore
.
for match_id, start, end in matches:
string_id = nlp.vocab.strings[match_id] # 'HelloWorld'
span = doc[start:end] # The matched span
Optionally, we could also choose to add more than one pattern, for example to also match sequences without punctuation between "hello" and "world":
patterns = [
[{"LOWER": "hello"}, {"IS_PUNCT": True}, {"LOWER": "world"}],
[{"LOWER": "hello"}, {"LOWER": "world"}]
]
matcher.add("HelloWorld", patterns)
By default, the matcher will only return the matches and not do anything
else, like merge entities or assign labels. This is all up to you and can be
defined individually for each pattern, by passing in a callback function as the
on_match
argument on add()
. This is useful, because it lets you write
entirely custom and pattern-specific logic. For example, you might want to
merge some patterns into one token, while adding entity labels for other
pattern types. You shouldn't have to create different matchers for each of those
processes.
Available token attributes
The available token pattern keys correspond to a number of
Token
attributes. The supported attributes for
rule-based matching are:
Attribute | Description |
---|---|
ORTH |
The exact verbatim text of a token. |
TEXT 2.1 |
The exact verbatim text of a token. |
NORM |
The normalized form of the token text. |
LOWER |
The lowercase form of the token text. |
LENGTH |
The length of the token text. |
IS_ALPHA , IS_ASCII , IS_DIGIT |
Token text consists of alphabetic characters, ASCII characters, digits. |
IS_LOWER , IS_UPPER , IS_TITLE |
Token text is in lowercase, uppercase, titlecase. |
IS_PUNCT , IS_SPACE , IS_STOP |
Token is punctuation, whitespace, stop word. |
IS_SENT_START |
Token is start of sentence. |
LIKE_NUM , LIKE_URL , LIKE_EMAIL |
Token text resembles a number, URL, email. |
SPACY |
Token has a trailing space. |
POS , TAG , MORPH , DEP , LEMMA , SHAPE |
The token's simple and extended part-of-speech tag, morphological analysis, dependency label, lemma, shape. Note that the values of these attributes are case-sensitive. For a list of available part-of-speech tags and dependency labels, see the Annotation Specifications. |
ENT_TYPE |
The token's entity label. |
_ 2.1 |
Properties in custom extension attributes. |
OP |
Operator or quantifier to determine how often to match a token pattern. |
No, it shouldn't. spaCy will normalize the names internally and
{"LOWER": "text"}
and {"lower": "text"}
will both produce the same result.
Using the uppercase version is mostly a convention to make it clear that the
attributes are "special" and don't exactly map to the token attributes like
Token.lower
and Token.lower_
.
spaCy can't provide access to all of the attributes because the Matcher
loops
over the Cython data, not the Python objects. Inside the matcher, we're dealing
with a TokenC
struct – we don't have an instance
of Token
. This means that all of the attributes that refer to
computed properties can't be accessed.
The uppercase attribute names like LOWER
or IS_PUNCT
refer to symbols from
the spacy.attrs
enum table. They're passed
into a function that essentially is a big case/switch statement, to figure out
which struct field to return. The same attribute identifiers are used in
Doc.to_array
, and a few other places in the code where
you need to describe fields like this.
The Matcher Explorer lets you test the
rule-based Matcher
by creating token patterns interactively and running them
over your text. Each token can set multiple attributes like text value,
part-of-speech tag or boolean flags. The token-based view lets you explore how
spaCy processes your text – and why your pattern matches, or why it doesn't.
Extended pattern syntax and attributes
Instead of mapping to a single value, token patterns can also map to a dictionary of properties. For example, to specify that the value of a lemma should be part of a list of values, or to set a minimum character length. The following rich comparison attributes are available:
Example
# Matches "love cats" or "likes flowers" pattern1 = [{"LEMMA": {"IN": ["like", "love"]}}, {"POS": "NOUN"}] # Matches tokens of length >= 10 pattern2 = [{"LENGTH": {">=": 10}}] # Match based on morph attributes pattern3 = [{"MORPH": {"IS_SUBSET": ["Number=Sing", "Gender=Neut"]}}] # "", "Number=Sing" and "Number=Sing|Gender=Neut" will match as subsets # "Number=Plur|Gender=Neut" will not match # "Number=Sing|Gender=Neut|Polite=Infm" will not match because it's a superset
Attribute | Description |
---|---|
IN |
Attribute value is member of a list. |
NOT_IN |
Attribute value is not member of a list. |
IS_SUBSET |
Attribute value (for MORPH or custom list attributes) is a subset of a list. |
IS_SUPERSET |
Attribute value (for MORPH or custom list attributes) is a superset of a list. |
INTERSECTS |
Attribute value (for MORPH or custom list attributes) has a non-empty intersection with a list. |
== , >= , <= , > , < |
Attribute value is equal, greater or equal, smaller or equal, greater or smaller. |
Regular expressions
In some cases, only matching tokens and token attributes isn't enough – for example, you might want to match different spellings of a word, without having to add a new pattern for each spelling.
pattern = [{"TEXT": {"REGEX": "^[Uu](\\.?|nited)$"}},
{"TEXT": {"REGEX": "^[Ss](\\.?|tates)$"}},
{"LOWER": "president"}]
The REGEX
operator allows defining rules for any attribute string value,
including custom attributes. It always needs to be applied to an attribute like
TEXT
, LOWER
or TAG
:
# Match different spellings of token texts
pattern = [{"TEXT": {"REGEX": "deff?in[ia]tely"}}]
# Match tokens with fine-grained POS tags starting with 'V'
pattern = [{"TAG": {"REGEX": "^V"}}]
# Match custom attribute values with regular expressions
pattern = [{"_": {"country": {"REGEX": "^[Uu](nited|\\.?) ?[Ss](tates|\\.?)$"}}}]
When using the REGEX
operator, keep in mind that it operates on single
tokens, not the whole text. Each expression you provide will be matched on a
token. If you need to match on the whole text instead, see the details on
regex matching on the whole text.
Matching regular expressions on the full text
If your expressions apply to multiple tokens, a simple solution is to match on
the doc.text
with re.finditer
and use the
Doc.char_span
method to create a Span
from the
character indices of the match. If the matched characters don't map to one or
more valid tokens, Doc.char_span
returns None
.
What's a valid token sequence?
In the example, the expression will also match
"US"
in"USA"
. However,"USA"
is a single token andSpan
objects are sequences of tokens. So"US"
cannot be its own span, because it does not end on a token boundary.
### {executable="true"}
import spacy
import re
nlp = spacy.load("en_core_web_sm")
doc = nlp("The United States of America (USA) are commonly known as the United States (U.S. or US) or America.")
expression = r"[Uu](nited|\\.?) ?[Ss](tates|\\.?)"
for match in re.finditer(expression, doc.text):
start, end = match.span()
span = doc.char_span(start, end)
# This is a Span object or None if match doesn't map to valid token sequence
if span is not None:
print("Found match:", span.text)
In some cases, you might want to expand the match to the closest token
boundaries, so you can create a Span
for "USA"
, even though only the
substring "US"
is matched. You can calculate this using the character offsets
of the tokens in the document, available as
Token.idx
. This lets you create a list of valid token
start and end boundaries and leaves you with a rather basic algorithmic problem:
Given a number, find the next lowest (start token) or the next highest (end
token) number that's part of a given list of numbers. This will be the closest
valid token boundary.
There are many ways to do this and the most straightforward one is to create a
dict keyed by characters in the Doc
, mapped to the token they're part of. It's
easy to write and less error-prone, and gives you a constant lookup time: you
only ever need to create the dict once per Doc
.
chars_to_tokens = {}
for token in doc:
for i in range(token.idx, token.idx + len(token.text)):
chars_to_tokens[i] = token.i
You can then look up character at a given position, and get the index of the
corresponding token that the character is part of. Your span would then be
doc[token_start:token_end]
. If a character isn't in the dict, it means it's
the (white)space tokens are split on. That hopefully shouldn't happen, though,
because it'd mean your regex is producing matches with leading or trailing
whitespace.
### {highlight="5-8"}
span = doc.char_span(start, end)
if span is not None:
print("Found match:", span.text)
else:
start_token = chars_to_tokens.get(start)
end_token = chars_to_tokens.get(end)
if start_token is not None and end_token is not None:
span = doc[start_token:end_token + 1]
print("Found closest match:", span.text)
Operators and quantifiers
The matcher also lets you use quantifiers, specified as the 'OP'
key.
Quantifiers let you define sequences of tokens to be matched, e.g. one or more
punctuation marks, or specify optional tokens. Note that there are no nested or
scoped quantifiers – instead, you can build those behaviors with on_match
callbacks.
OP | Description |
---|---|
! |
Negate the pattern, by requiring it to match exactly 0 times. |
? |
Make the pattern optional, by allowing it to match 0 or 1 times. |
+ |
Require the pattern to match 1 or more times. |
* |
Allow the pattern to match zero or more times. |
Example
pattern = [{"LOWER": "hello"}, {"IS_PUNCT": True, "OP": "?"}]
In versions before v2.1.0, the semantics of the +
and *
operators behave
inconsistently. They were usually interpreted "greedily", i.e. longer matches
are returned where possible. However, if you specify two +
and *
patterns in
a row and their matches overlap, the first operator will behave non-greedily.
This quirk in the semantics is corrected in spaCy v2.1.0.
Using wildcard token patterns
While the token attributes offer many options to write highly specific patterns,
you can also use an empty dictionary, {}
as a wildcard representing any
token. This is useful if you know the context of what you're trying to match,
but very little about the specific token and its characters. For example, let's
say you're trying to extract people's user names from your data. All you know is
that they are listed as "User name: {username}". The name itself may contain any
character, but no whitespace – so you'll know it will be handled as one token.
[{"ORTH": "User"}, {"ORTH": "name"}, {"ORTH": ":"}, {}]
Validating and debugging patterns
The Matcher
can validate patterns against a JSON schema with the option
validate=True
. This is useful for debugging patterns during development, in
particular for catching unsupported attributes.
### {executable="true"}
import spacy
from spacy.matcher import Matcher
nlp = spacy.load("en_core_web_sm")
matcher = Matcher(nlp.vocab, validate=True)
# Add match ID "HelloWorld" with unsupported attribute CASEINSENSITIVE
pattern = [{"LOWER": "hello"}, {"IS_PUNCT": True}, {"CASEINSENSITIVE": "world"}]
matcher.add("HelloWorld", [pattern])
# 🚨 Raises an error:
# MatchPatternError: Invalid token patterns for matcher rule 'HelloWorld'
# Pattern 0:
# - [pattern -> 2 -> CASEINSENSITIVE] extra fields not permitted
Adding on_match rules
To move on to a more realistic example, let's say you're working with a large
corpus of blog articles, and you want to match all mentions of "Google I/O"
(which spaCy tokenizes as ['Google', 'I', '/', 'O'
]). To be safe, you only
match on the uppercase versions, avoiding matches with phrases such as "Google
i/o".
### {executable="true"}
from spacy.lang.en import English
from spacy.matcher import Matcher
from spacy.tokens import Span
nlp = English()
matcher = Matcher(nlp.vocab)
def add_event_ent(matcher, doc, i, matches):
# Get the current match and create tuple of entity label, start and end.
# Append entity to the doc's entity. (Don't overwrite doc.ents!)
match_id, start, end = matches[i]
entity = Span(doc, start, end, label="EVENT")
doc.ents += (entity,)
print(entity.text)
pattern = [{"ORTH": "Google"}, {"ORTH": "I"}, {"ORTH": "/"}, {"ORTH": "O"}]
matcher.add("GoogleIO", [pattern], on_match=add_event_ent)
doc = nlp("This is a text about Google I/O")
matches = matcher(doc)
A very similar logic has been implemented in the built-in
EntityRuler
by the way. It also takes care of handling
overlapping matches, which you would otherwise have to take care of yourself.
Tip: Visualizing matches
When working with entities, you can use displaCy to quickly generate a NER visualization from your updated
Doc
, which can be exported as an HTML file:from spacy import displacy html = displacy.render(doc, style="ent", page=True, options={"ents": ["EVENT"]})
For more info and examples, see the usage guide on visualizing spaCy.
We can now call the matcher on our documents. The patterns will be matched in the order they occur in the text. The matcher will then iterate over the matches, look up the callback for the match ID that was matched, and invoke it.
doc = nlp(YOUR_TEXT_HERE)
matcher(doc)
When the callback is invoked, it is passed four arguments: the matcher itself, the document, the position of the current match, and the total list of matches. This allows you to write callbacks that consider the entire set of matched phrases, so that you can resolve overlaps and other conflicts in whatever way you prefer.
Argument | Description |
---|---|
matcher |
The matcher instance. |
doc |
The document the matcher was used on. |
i |
Index of the current match (matches[i ]). |
matches |
A list of (match_id, start, end) tuples, describing the matches. A match tuple describes a span doc[start:end ]. |
Creating spans from matches
Creating Span
objects from the returned matches is a very common
use case. spaCy makes this easy by giving you access to the start
and end
token of each match, which you can use to construct a new span with an optional
label. As of spaCy v3.0, you can also set as_spans=True
when calling the
matcher on a Doc
, which will return a list of Span
objects
using the match_id
as the span label.
### {executable="true"}
import spacy
from spacy.matcher import Matcher
from spacy.tokens import Span
nlp = spacy.blank("en")
matcher = Matcher(nlp.vocab)
matcher.add("PERSON", [[{"lower": "barack"}, {"lower": "obama"}]])
doc = nlp("Barack Obama was the 44th president of the United States")
# 1. Return (match_id, start, end) tuples
matches = matcher(doc)
for match_id, start, end in matches:
# Create the matched span and assign the match_id as a label
span = Span(doc, start, end, label=match_id)
print(span.text, span.label_)
# 2. Return Span objects directly
matches = matcher(doc, as_spans=True)
for span in matches:
print(span.text, span.label_)
Using custom pipeline components
Let's say your data also contains some annoying pre-processing artifacts, like
leftover HTML line breaks (e.g. <br>
or <BR/>
). To make your text easier to
analyze, you want to merge those into one token and flag them, to make sure you
can ignore them later. Ideally, this should all be done automatically as you
process the text. You can achieve this by adding a
custom pipeline component
that's called on each Doc
object, merges the leftover HTML spans and sets an
attribute bad_html
on the token.
### {executable="true"}
import spacy
from spacy.language import Language
from spacy.matcher import Matcher
from spacy.tokens import Token
# We're using a component factory because the component needs to be
# initialized with the shared vocab via the nlp object
@Language.factory("html_merger")
def create_bad_html_merger(nlp, name):
return BadHTMLMerger(nlp.vocab)
class BadHTMLMerger:
def __init__(self, vocab):
patterns = [
[{"ORTH": "<"}, {"LOWER": "br"}, {"ORTH": ">"}],
[{"ORTH": "<"}, {"LOWER": "br/"}, {"ORTH": ">"}],
]
# Register a new token extension to flag bad HTML
Token.set_extension("bad_html", default=False)
self.matcher = Matcher(vocab)
self.matcher.add("BAD_HTML", patterns)
def __call__(self, doc):
# This method is invoked when the component is called on a Doc
matches = self.matcher(doc)
spans = [] # Collect the matched spans here
for match_id, start, end in matches:
spans.append(doc[start:end])
with doc.retokenize() as retokenizer:
for span in spans:
retokenizer.merge(span)
for token in span:
token._.bad_html = True # Mark token as bad HTML
return doc
nlp = spacy.load("en_core_web_sm")
nlp.add_pipe("html_merger", last=True) # Add component to the pipeline
doc = nlp("Hello<br>world! <br/> This is a test.")
for token in doc:
print(token.text, token._.bad_html)
Instead of hard-coding the patterns into the component, you could also make it
take a path to a JSON file containing the patterns. This lets you reuse the
component with different patterns, depending on your application. When adding
the component to the pipeline with nlp.add_pipe
, you
can pass in the argument via the config
:
@Language.factory("html_merger", default_config={"path": None})
def create_bad_html_merger(nlp, name, path):
return BadHTMLMerger(nlp, path=path)
nlp.add_pipe("html_merger", config={"path": "/path/to/patterns.json"})
For more details and examples of how to create custom pipeline components and extension attributes, see the usage guide.
Example: Using linguistic annotations
Let's say you're analyzing user comments and you want to find out what people are saying about Facebook. You want to start off by finding adjectives following "Facebook is" or "Facebook was". This is obviously a very rudimentary solution, but it'll be fast, and a great way to get an idea for what's in your data. Your pattern could look like this:
[{"LOWER": "facebook"}, {"LEMMA": "be"}, {"POS": "ADV", "OP": "*"}, {"POS": "ADJ"}]
This translates to a token whose lowercase form matches "facebook" (like Facebook, facebook or FACEBOOK), followed by a token with the lemma "be" (for example, is, was, or 's), followed by an optional adverb, followed by an adjective. Using the linguistic annotations here is especially useful, because you can tell spaCy to match "Facebook's annoying", but not "Facebook's annoying ads". The optional adverb makes sure you won't miss adjectives with intensifiers, like "pretty awful" or "very nice".
To get a quick overview of the results, you could collect all sentences
containing a match and render them with the
displaCy visualizer. In the callback function, you'll have
access to the start
and end
of each match, as well as the parent Doc
. This
lets you determine the sentence containing the match, doc[start:end].sent
, and
calculate the start and end of the matched span within the sentence. Using
displaCy in "manual" mode lets you pass in a
list of dictionaries containing the text and entities to render.
### {executable="true"}
import spacy
from spacy import displacy
from spacy.matcher import Matcher
nlp = spacy.load("en_core_web_sm")
matcher = Matcher(nlp.vocab)
matched_sents = [] # Collect data of matched sentences to be visualized
def collect_sents(matcher, doc, i, matches):
match_id, start, end = matches[i]
span = doc[start:end] # Matched span
sent = span.sent # Sentence containing matched span
# Append mock entity for match in displaCy style to matched_sents
# get the match span by ofsetting the start and end of the span with the
# start and end of the sentence in the doc
match_ents = [{
"start": span.start_char - sent.start_char,
"end": span.end_char - sent.start_char,
"label": "MATCH",
}]
matched_sents.append({"text": sent.text, "ents": match_ents})
pattern = [{"LOWER": "facebook"}, {"LEMMA": "be"}, {"POS": "ADV", "OP": "*"},
{"POS": "ADJ"}]
matcher.add("FacebookIs", [pattern], on_match=collect_sents) # add pattern
doc = nlp("I'd say that Facebook is evil. – Facebook is pretty cool, right?")
matches = matcher(doc)
# Serve visualization of sentences containing match with displaCy
# set manual=True to make displaCy render straight from a dictionary
# (if you're not running the code within a Jupyer environment, you can
# use displacy.serve instead)
displacy.render(matched_sents, style="ent", manual=True)
Example: Phone numbers
Phone numbers can have many different formats and matching them is often tricky. During tokenization, spaCy will leave sequences of numbers intact and only split on whitespace and punctuation. This means that your match pattern will have to look out for number sequences of a certain length, surrounded by specific punctuation – depending on the national conventions.
The IS_DIGIT
flag is not very helpful here, because it doesn't tell us
anything about the length. However, you can use the SHAPE
flag, with each d
representing a digit (up to 4 digits / characters):
[{"ORTH": "("}, {"SHAPE": "ddd"}, {"ORTH": ")"}, {"SHAPE": "dddd"},
{"ORTH": "-", "OP": "?"}, {"SHAPE": "dddd"}]
This will match phone numbers of the format (123) 4567 8901 or (123)
4567-8901. To also match formats like (123) 456 789, you can add a second
pattern using 'ddd'
in place of 'dddd'
. By hard-coding some values, you can
match only certain, country-specific numbers. For example, here's a pattern to
match the most common formats of
international German numbers:
[{"ORTH": "+"}, {"ORTH": "49"}, {"ORTH": "(", "OP": "?"}, {"SHAPE": "dddd"},
{"ORTH": ")", "OP": "?"}, {"SHAPE": "dddd", "LENGTH": 6}]
Depending on the formats your application needs to match, creating an extensive set of rules like this is often better than training a model. It'll produce more predictable results, is much easier to modify and extend, and doesn't require any training data – only a set of test cases.
### {executable="true"}
import spacy
from spacy.matcher import Matcher
nlp = spacy.load("en_core_web_sm")
matcher = Matcher(nlp.vocab)
pattern = [{"ORTH": "("}, {"SHAPE": "ddd"}, {"ORTH": ")"}, {"SHAPE": "ddd"},
{"ORTH": "-", "OP": "?"}, {"SHAPE": "ddd"}]
matcher.add("PHONE_NUMBER", [pattern])
doc = nlp("Call me at (123) 456 789 or (123) 456 789!")
print([t.text for t in doc])
matches = matcher(doc)
for match_id, start, end in matches:
span = doc[start:end]
print(span.text)
Example: Hashtags and emoji on social media
Social media posts, especially tweets, can be difficult to work with. They're very short and often contain various emoji and hashtags. By only looking at the plain text, you'll lose a lot of valuable semantic information.
Let's say you've extracted a large sample of social media posts on a specific
topic, for example posts mentioning a brand name or product. As the first step
of your data exploration, you want to filter out posts containing certain emoji
and use them to assign a general sentiment score, based on whether the expressed
emotion is positive or negative, e.g. 😀 or 😞. You also want to find, merge and
label hashtags like #MondayMotivation
, to be able to ignore or analyze them
later.
Note on sentiment analysis
Ultimately, sentiment analysis is not always that easy. In addition to the emoji, you'll also want to take specific words into account and check the
subtree
for intensifiers like "very", to increase the sentiment score. At some point, you might also want to train a sentiment model. However, the approach described in this example is very useful for bootstrapping rules to collect training data. It's also an incredibly fast way to gather first insights into your data – with about 1 million tweets, you'd be looking at a processing time of under 1 minute.
By default, spaCy's tokenizer will split emoji into separate tokens. This means
that you can create a pattern for one or more emoji tokens. Valid hashtags
usually consist of a #
, plus a sequence of ASCII characters with no
whitespace, making them easy to match as well.
### {executable="true"}
from spacy.lang.en import English
from spacy.matcher import Matcher
nlp = English() # We only want the tokenizer, so no need to load a pipeline
matcher = Matcher(nlp.vocab)
pos_emoji = ["😀", "😃", "😂", "🤣", "😊", "😍"] # Positive emoji
neg_emoji = ["😞", "😠", "😩", "😢", "😭", "😒"] # Negative emoji
# Add patterns to match one or more emoji tokens
pos_patterns = [[{"ORTH": emoji}] for emoji in pos_emoji]
neg_patterns = [[{"ORTH": emoji}] for emoji in neg_emoji]
# Function to label the sentiment
def label_sentiment(matcher, doc, i, matches):
match_id, start, end = matches[i]
if doc.vocab.strings[match_id] == "HAPPY": # Don't forget to get string!
doc.sentiment += 0.1 # Add 0.1 for positive sentiment
elif doc.vocab.strings[match_id] == "SAD":
doc.sentiment -= 0.1 # Subtract 0.1 for negative sentiment
matcher.add("HAPPY", pos_patterns, on_match=label_sentiment) # Add positive pattern
matcher.add("SAD", neg_patterns, on_match=label_sentiment) # Add negative pattern
# Add pattern for valid hashtag, i.e. '#' plus any ASCII token
matcher.add("HASHTAG", [[{"ORTH": "#"}, {"IS_ASCII": True}]])
doc = nlp("Hello world 😀 #MondayMotivation")
matches = matcher(doc)
for match_id, start, end in matches:
string_id = doc.vocab.strings[match_id] # Look up string ID
span = doc[start:end]
print(string_id, span.text)
Because the on_match
callback receives the ID of each match, you can use the
same function to handle the sentiment assignment for both the positive and
negative pattern. To keep it simple, we'll either add or subtract 0.1
points –
this way, the score will also reflect combinations of emoji, even positive and
negative ones.
With a library like Emojipedia,
we can also retrieve a short description for each emoji – for example, 😍's
official title is "Smiling Face With Heart-Eyes". Assigning it to a
custom attribute on
the emoji span will make it available as span._.emoji_desc
.
from emojipedia import Emojipedia # Installation: pip install emojipedia
from spacy.tokens import Span # Get the global Span object
Span.set_extension("emoji_desc", default=None) # Register the custom attribute
def label_sentiment(matcher, doc, i, matches):
match_id, start, end = matches[i]
if doc.vocab.strings[match_id] == "HAPPY": # Don't forget to get string!
doc.sentiment += 0.1 # Add 0.1 for positive sentiment
elif doc.vocab.strings[match_id] == "SAD":
doc.sentiment -= 0.1 # Subtract 0.1 for negative sentiment
span = doc[start:end]
emoji = Emojipedia.search(span[0].text) # Get data for emoji
span._.emoji_desc = emoji.title # Assign emoji description
To label the hashtags, we can use a custom attribute set on the respective token:
### {executable="true"}
import spacy
from spacy.matcher import Matcher
from spacy.tokens import Token
nlp = spacy.load("en_core_web_sm")
matcher = Matcher(nlp.vocab)
# Add pattern for valid hashtag, i.e. '#' plus any ASCII token
matcher.add("HASHTAG", [[{"ORTH": "#"}, {"IS_ASCII": True}]])
# Register token extension
Token.set_extension("is_hashtag", default=False)
doc = nlp("Hello world 😀 #MondayMotivation")
matches = matcher(doc)
hashtags = []
for match_id, start, end in matches:
if doc.vocab.strings[match_id] == "HASHTAG":
hashtags.append(doc[start:end])
with doc.retokenize() as retokenizer:
for span in hashtags:
retokenizer.merge(span)
for token in span:
token._.is_hashtag = True
for token in doc:
print(token.text, token._.is_hashtag)
Efficient phrase matching
If you need to match large terminology lists, you can also use the
PhraseMatcher
and create Doc
objects
instead of token patterns, which is much more efficient overall. The Doc
patterns can contain single or multiple tokens.
Adding phrase patterns
### {executable="true"}
import spacy
from spacy.matcher import PhraseMatcher
nlp = spacy.load("en_core_web_sm")
matcher = PhraseMatcher(nlp.vocab)
terms = ["Barack Obama", "Angela Merkel", "Washington, D.C."]
# Only run nlp.make_doc to speed things up
patterns = [nlp.make_doc(text) for text in terms]
matcher.add("TerminologyList", patterns)
doc = nlp("German Chancellor Angela Merkel and US President Barack Obama "
"converse in the Oval Office inside the White House in Washington, D.C.")
matches = matcher(doc)
for match_id, start, end in matches:
span = doc[start:end]
print(span.text)
Since spaCy is used for processing both the patterns and the text to be matched,
you won't have to worry about specific tokenization – for example, you can
simply pass in nlp("Washington, D.C.")
and won't have to write a complex token
pattern covering the exact tokenization of the term.
To create the patterns, each phrase has to be processed with the nlp
object.
If you have a trained pipeline loaded, doing this in a loop or list
comprehension can easily become inefficient and slow. If you only need the
tokenization and lexical attributes, you can run
nlp.make_doc
instead, which will only run the
tokenizer. For an additional speed boost, you can also use the
nlp.tokenizer.pipe
method, which will process the texts
as a stream.
- patterns = [nlp(term) for term in LOTS_OF_TERMS]
+ patterns = [nlp.make_doc(term) for term in LOTS_OF_TERMS]
+ patterns = list(nlp.tokenizer.pipe(LOTS_OF_TERMS))
Matching on other token attributes
By default, the PhraseMatcher
will match on the verbatim token text, e.g.
Token.text
. By setting the attr
argument on initialization, you can change
which token attribute the matcher should use when comparing the phrase
pattern to the matched Doc
. For example, using the attribute LOWER
lets you
match on Token.lower
and create case-insensitive match patterns:
### {executable="true"}
from spacy.lang.en import English
from spacy.matcher import PhraseMatcher
nlp = English()
matcher = PhraseMatcher(nlp.vocab, attr="LOWER")
patterns = [nlp.make_doc(name) for name in ["Angela Merkel", "Barack Obama"]]
matcher.add("Names", patterns)
doc = nlp("angela merkel and us president barack Obama")
for match_id, start, end in matcher(doc):
print("Matched based on lowercase token text:", doc[start:end])
The examples here use nlp.make_doc
to create Doc
object patterns as efficiently as possible and without running any of the other
pipeline components. If the token attribute you want to match on are set by a
pipeline component, make sure that the pipeline component runs when you
create the pattern. For example, to match on POS
or LEMMA
, the pattern Doc
objects need to have part-of-speech tags set by the tagger
or morphologizer
.
You can either call the nlp
object on your pattern texts instead of
nlp.make_doc
, or use nlp.select_pipes
to
disable components selectively.
Another possible use case is matching number tokens like IP addresses based on
their shape. This means that you won't have to worry about how those string will
be tokenized and you'll be able to find tokens and combinations of tokens based
on a few examples. Here, we're matching on the shapes ddd.d.d.d
and
ddd.ddd.d.d
:
### {executable="true"}
from spacy.lang.en import English
from spacy.matcher import PhraseMatcher
nlp = English()
matcher = PhraseMatcher(nlp.vocab, attr="SHAPE")
matcher.add("IP", [nlp("127.0.0.1"), nlp("127.127.0.0")])
doc = nlp("Often the router will have an IP address such as 192.168.1.1 or 192.168.2.1.")
for match_id, start, end in matcher(doc):
print("Matched based on token shape:", doc[start:end])
In theory, the same also works for attributes like POS
. For example, a pattern
nlp("I like cats")
matched based on its part-of-speech tag would return a
match for "I love dogs". You could also match on boolean flags like IS_PUNCT
to match phrases with the same sequence of punctuation and non-punctuation
tokens as the pattern. But this can easily get confusing and doesn't have much
of an advantage over writing one or two token patterns.
Dependency Matcher
The DependencyMatcher
lets you match patterns within
the dependency parse using
Semgrex
operators. It requires a model containing a parser such as the
DependencyParser
. Instead of defining a list of
adjacent tokens as in Matcher
patterns, the DependencyMatcher
patterns match
tokens in the dependency parse and specify the relations between them.
### Example from spacy.matcher import DependencyMatcher # "[subject] ... initially founded" pattern = [ # anchor token: founded { "RIGHT_ID": "founded", "RIGHT_ATTRS": {"ORTH": "founded"} }, # founded -> subject { "LEFT_ID": "founded", "REL_OP": ">", "RIGHT_ID": "subject", "RIGHT_ATTRS": {"DEP": "nsubj"} }, # "founded" follows "initially" { "LEFT_ID": "founded", "REL_OP": ";", "RIGHT_ID": "initially", "RIGHT_ATTRS": {"ORTH": "initially"} } ] matcher = DependencyMatcher(nlp.vocab) matcher.add("FOUNDED", [pattern]) matches = matcher(doc)
A pattern added to the dependency matcher consists of a list of
dictionaries, with each dictionary describing a token to match and its
relation to an existing token in the pattern. Except for the first
dictionary, which defines an anchor token using only RIGHT_ID
and
RIGHT_ATTRS
, each pattern should have the following keys:
Name | Description |
---|---|
LEFT_ID |
The name of the left-hand node in the relation, which has been defined in an earlier node. |
REL_OP |
An operator that describes how the two nodes are related. |
RIGHT_ID |
A unique name for the right-hand node in the relation. |
RIGHT_ATTRS |
The token attributes to match for the right-hand node in the same format as patterns provided to the regular token-based Matcher . |
Each additional token added to the pattern is linked to an existing token
LEFT_ID
by the relation REL_OP
. The new token is given the name RIGHT_ID
and described by the attributes RIGHT_ATTRS
.
Because the unique token names in LEFT_ID
and RIGHT_ID
are used to
identify tokens, the order of the dicts in the patterns is important: a token
name needs to be defined as RIGHT_ID
in one dict in the pattern before it
can be used as LEFT_ID
in another dict.
Dependency matcher operators
The following operators are supported by the DependencyMatcher
, most of which
come directly from
Semgrex:
Symbol | Description |
---|---|
A < B |
A is the immediate dependent of B . |
A > B |
A is the immediate head of B . |
A << B |
A is the dependent in a chain to B following dep → head paths. |
A >> B |
A is the head in a chain to B following head → dep paths. |
A . B |
A immediately precedes B , i.e. A.i == B.i - 1 , and both are within the same dependency tree. |
A .* B |
A precedes B , i.e. A.i < B.i , and both are within the same dependency tree (not in Semgrex). |
A ; B |
A immediately follows B , i.e. A.i == B.i + 1 , and both are within the same dependency tree (not in Semgrex). |
A ;* B |
A follows B , i.e. A.i > B.i , and both are within the same dependency tree (not in Semgrex). |
A $+ B |
B is a right immediate sibling of A , i.e. A and B have the same parent and A.i == B.i - 1 . |
A $- B |
B is a left immediate sibling of A , i.e. A and B have the same parent and A.i == B.i + 1 . |
A $++ B |
B is a right sibling of A , i.e. A and B have the same parent and A.i < B.i . |
A $-- B |
B is a left sibling of A , i.e. A and B have the same parent and A.i > B.i . |
Designing dependency matcher patterns
Let's say we want to find sentences describing who founded what kind of company:
- Smith founded a healthcare company in 2005.
- Williams initially founded an insurance company in 1987.
- Lee, an experienced CEO, has founded two AI startups.
The dependency parse for "Smith founded a healthcare company" shows types of relations and tokens we want to match:
Visualizing the parse
The
displacy
visualizer lets you renderDoc
objects and their dependency parse and part-of-speech tags:import spacy from spacy import displacy nlp = spacy.load("en_core_web_sm") doc = nlp("Smith founded a healthcare company") displacy.serve(doc)
import DisplaCyDepFoundedHtml from 'images/displacy-dep-founded.html'