<!--- Provide a general summary of your changes in the title. --> ## Description The new website is implemented using [Gatsby](https://www.gatsbyjs.org) with [Remark](https://github.com/remarkjs/remark) and [MDX](https://mdxjs.com/). This allows authoring content in **straightforward Markdown** without the usual limitations. Standard elements can be overwritten with powerful [React](http://reactjs.org/) components and wherever Markdown syntax isn't enough, JSX components can be used. Hopefully, this update will also make it much easier to contribute to the docs. Once this PR is merged, I'll implement auto-deployment via [Netlify](https://netlify.com) on a specific branch (to avoid building the website on every PR). There's a bunch of other cool stuff that the new setup will allow us to do – including writing front-end tests, service workers, offline support, implementing a search and so on. This PR also includes various new docs pages and content. Resolves #3270. Resolves #3222. Resolves #2947. Resolves #2837. ### Types of change enhancement ## Checklist <!--- Before you submit the PR, go over this checklist and make sure you can tick off all the boxes. [] -> [x] --> - [x] I have submitted the spaCy Contributor Agreement. - [x] I ran the tests, and all new and existing tests passed. - [x] My changes don't require a change to the documentation, or if they do, I've added all required information.
8.5 KiB
title | next | menu | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cython Architecture | /api/cython-structs |
|
Overview
What's Cython?
Cython is a language for writing C extensions for Python. Most Python code is also valid Cython, but you can add type declarations to get efficient memory-managed code just like C or C++.
This section documents spaCy's C-level data structures and interfaces, intended for use from Cython. Some of the attributes are primarily for internal use, and all C-level functions and methods are designed for speed over safety – if you make a mistake and access an array out-of-bounds, the program may crash abruptly.
With Cython there are four ways of declaring complex data types. Unfortunately we use all four in different places, as they all have different utility:
Declaration | Description | Example |
---|---|---|
class |
A normal Python class. | Language |
cdef class |
A Python extension type. Differs from a normal Python class in that its attributes can be defined on the underlying struct. Can have C-level objects as attributes (notably structs and pointers), and can have methods which have C-level objects as arguments or return types. | Lexeme |
cdef struct |
A struct is just a collection of variables, sort of like a named tuple, except the memory is contiguous. Structs can't have methods, only attributes. | LexemeC |
cdef cppclass |
A C++ class. Like a struct, this can be allocated on the stack, but can have methods, a constructor and a destructor. Differs from cdef class in that it can be created and destroyed without acquiring the Python global interpreter lock. This style is the most obscure. |
StateC |
The most important classes in spaCy are defined as cdef class
objects. The
underlying data for these objects is usually gathered into a struct, which is
usually named c
. For instance, the Lexeme
class holds a LexemeC
struct, at Lexeme.c
.
This lets you shed the Python container, and pass a pointer to the underlying
data into C-level functions.
Conventions
spaCy's core data structures are implemented as Cython
cdef
classes. Memory is managed through the
cymem
cymem.Pool
class, which allows
you to allocate memory which will be freed when the Pool
object is garbage
collected. This means you usually don't have to worry about freeing memory. You
just have to decide which Python object owns the memory, and make it own the
Pool
. When that object goes out of scope, the memory will be freed. You do
have to take care that no pointers outlive the object that owns them — but this
is generally quite easy.
All Cython modules should have the # cython: infer_types=True
compiler
directive at the top of the file. This makes the code much cleaner, as it avoids
the need for many type declarations. If possible, you should prefer to declare
your functions nogil
, even if you don't especially care about multi-threading.
The reason is that nogil
functions help the Cython compiler reason about your
code quite a lot — you're telling the compiler that no Python dynamics are
possible. This lets many errors be raised, and ensures your function will run at
C speed.
Cython gives you many choices of sequences: you could have a Python list, a numpy array, a memory view, a C++ vector, or a pointer. Pointers are preferred, because they are fastest, have the most explicit semantics, and let the compiler check your code more strictly. C++ vectors are also great — but you should only use them internally in functions. It's less friendly to accept a vector as an argument, because that asks the user to do much more work. Here's how to get a pointer from a numpy array, memory view or vector:
cdef void get_pointers(np.ndarray[int, mode='c'] numpy_array, vector[int] cpp_vector, int[::1] memory_view) nogil:
pointer1 = <int*>numpy_array.data
pointer2 = cpp_vector.data()
pointer3 = &memory_view[0]
Both C arrays and C++ vectors reassure the compiler that no Python operations are possible on your variable. This is a big advantage: it lets the Cython compiler raise many more errors for you.
When getting a pointer from a numpy array or memoryview, take care that the data is actually stored in C-contiguous order — otherwise you'll get a pointer to nonsense. The type-declarations in the code above should generate runtime errors if buffers with incorrect memory layouts are passed in. To iterate over the array, the following style is preferred:
cdef int c_total(const int* int_array, int length) nogil:
total = 0
for item in int_array[:length]:
total += item
return total
If this is confusing, consider that the compiler couldn't deal with
for item in int_array:
— there's no length attached to a raw pointer, so how
could we figure out where to stop? The length is provided in the slice notation
as a solution to this. Note that we don't have to declare the type of item
in
the code above — the compiler can easily infer it. This gives us tidy code that
looks quite like Python, but is exactly as fast as C — because we've made sure
the compilation to C is trivial.
Your functions cannot be declared nogil
if they need to create Python objects
or call Python functions. This is perfectly okay — you shouldn't torture your
code just to get nogil
functions. However, if your function isn't nogil
, you
should compile your module with cython -a --cplus my_module.pyx
and open the
resulting my_module.html
file in a browser. This will let you see how Cython
is compiling your code. Calls into the Python run-time will be in bright yellow.
This lets you easily see whether Cython is able to correctly type your code, or
whether there are unexpected problems.
Working in Cython is very rewarding once you're over the initial learning curve.
As with C and C++, the first way you write something in Cython will often be the
performance-optimal approach. In contrast, Python optimization generally
requires a lot of experimentation. Is it faster to have an if item in my_dict
check, or to use .get()
? What about try
/except
? Does this numpy operation
create a copy? There's no way to guess the answers to these questions, and
you'll usually be dissatisfied with your results — so there's no way to know
when to stop this process. In the worst case, you'll make a mess that invites
the next reader to try their luck too. This is like one of those
volcanic gas-traps,
where the rescuers keep passing out from low oxygen, causing another rescuer to
follow — only to succumb themselves. In short, just say no to optimizing your
Python. If it's not fast enough the first time, just switch to Cython.
- Official Cython documentation (cython.org)
- Writing C in Cython (explosion.ai)
- Multi-threading spaCy’s parser and named entity recognizer (explosion.ai)