spaCy/spacy/pipeline.pyx

163 lines
5.6 KiB
Cython
Raw Normal View History

Update draft of parser neural network model Model is good, but code is messy. Currently requires Chainer, which may cause the build to fail on machines without a GPU. Outline of the model: We first predict context-sensitive vectors for each word in the input: (embed_lower | embed_prefix | embed_suffix | embed_shape) >> Maxout(token_width) >> convolution ** 4 This convolutional layer is shared between the tagger and the parser. This prevents the parser from needing tag features. To boost the representation, we make a "super tag" with POS, morphology and dependency label. The tagger predicts this by adding a softmax layer onto the convolutional layer --- so, we're teaching the convolutional layer to give us a representation that's one affine transform from this informative lexical information. This is obviously good for the parser (which backprops to the convolutions too). The parser model makes a state vector by concatenating the vector representations for its context tokens. Current results suggest few context tokens works well. Maybe this is a bug. The current context tokens: * S0, S1, S2: Top three words on the stack * B0, B1: First two words of the buffer * S0L1, S0L2: Leftmost and second leftmost children of S0 * S0R1, S0R2: Rightmost and second rightmost children of S0 * S1L1, S1L2, S1R2, S1R, B0L1, B0L2: Likewise for S1 and B0 This makes the state vector quite long: 13*T, where T is the token vector width (128 is working well). Fortunately, there's a way to structure the computation to save some expense (and make it more GPU friendly). The parser typically visits 2*N states for a sentence of length N (although it may visit more, if it back-tracks with a non-monotonic transition). A naive implementation would require 2*N (B, 13*T) @ (13*T, H) matrix multiplications for a batch of size B. We can instead perform one (B*N, T) @ (T, 13*H) multiplication, to pre-compute the hidden weights for each positional feature wrt the words in the batch. (Note that our token vectors come from the CNN -- so we can't play this trick over the vocabulary. That's how Stanford's NN parser works --- and why its model is so big.) This pre-computation strategy allows a nice compromise between GPU-friendliness and implementation simplicity. The CNN and the wide lower layer are computed on the GPU, and then the precomputed hidden weights are moved to the CPU, before we start the transition-based parsing process. This makes a lot of things much easier. We don't have to worry about variable-length batch sizes, and we don't have to implement the dynamic oracle in CUDA to train. Currently the parser's loss function is multilabel log loss, as the dynamic oracle allows multiple states to be 0 cost. This is defined as: (exp(score) / Z) - (exp(score) / gZ) Where gZ is the sum of the scores assigned to gold classes. I'm very interested in regressing on the cost directly, but so far this isn't working well. Machinery is in place for beam-search, which has been working well for the linear model. Beam search should benefit greatly from the pre-computation trick.
2017-05-13 00:09:15 +03:00
# cython: infer_types=True
# cython: profile=True
# coding: utf8
from __future__ import unicode_literals
from thinc.api import chain, layerize, with_getitem
from thinc.neural import Model, Softmax
2017-05-07 19:04:24 +03:00
import numpy
Update draft of parser neural network model Model is good, but code is messy. Currently requires Chainer, which may cause the build to fail on machines without a GPU. Outline of the model: We first predict context-sensitive vectors for each word in the input: (embed_lower | embed_prefix | embed_suffix | embed_shape) >> Maxout(token_width) >> convolution ** 4 This convolutional layer is shared between the tagger and the parser. This prevents the parser from needing tag features. To boost the representation, we make a "super tag" with POS, morphology and dependency label. The tagger predicts this by adding a softmax layer onto the convolutional layer --- so, we're teaching the convolutional layer to give us a representation that's one affine transform from this informative lexical information. This is obviously good for the parser (which backprops to the convolutions too). The parser model makes a state vector by concatenating the vector representations for its context tokens. Current results suggest few context tokens works well. Maybe this is a bug. The current context tokens: * S0, S1, S2: Top three words on the stack * B0, B1: First two words of the buffer * S0L1, S0L2: Leftmost and second leftmost children of S0 * S0R1, S0R2: Rightmost and second rightmost children of S0 * S1L1, S1L2, S1R2, S1R, B0L1, B0L2: Likewise for S1 and B0 This makes the state vector quite long: 13*T, where T is the token vector width (128 is working well). Fortunately, there's a way to structure the computation to save some expense (and make it more GPU friendly). The parser typically visits 2*N states for a sentence of length N (although it may visit more, if it back-tracks with a non-monotonic transition). A naive implementation would require 2*N (B, 13*T) @ (13*T, H) matrix multiplications for a batch of size B. We can instead perform one (B*N, T) @ (T, 13*H) multiplication, to pre-compute the hidden weights for each positional feature wrt the words in the batch. (Note that our token vectors come from the CNN -- so we can't play this trick over the vocabulary. That's how Stanford's NN parser works --- and why its model is so big.) This pre-computation strategy allows a nice compromise between GPU-friendliness and implementation simplicity. The CNN and the wide lower layer are computed on the GPU, and then the precomputed hidden weights are moved to the CPU, before we start the transition-based parsing process. This makes a lot of things much easier. We don't have to worry about variable-length batch sizes, and we don't have to implement the dynamic oracle in CUDA to train. Currently the parser's loss function is multilabel log loss, as the dynamic oracle allows multiple states to be 0 cost. This is defined as: (exp(score) / Z) - (exp(score) / gZ) Where gZ is the sum of the scores assigned to gold classes. I'm very interested in regressing on the cost directly, but so far this isn't working well. Machinery is in place for beam-search, which has been working well for the linear model. Beam search should benefit greatly from the pre-computation trick.
2017-05-13 00:09:15 +03:00
cimport numpy as np
2017-05-08 15:53:45 +03:00
from .tokens.doc cimport Doc
from .syntax.parser cimport Parser
from .syntax.parser import get_templates as get_feature_templates
2017-03-11 16:00:20 +03:00
from .syntax.beam_parser cimport BeamParser
from .syntax.ner cimport BiluoPushDown
from .syntax.arc_eager cimport ArcEager
from .tagger import Tagger
Update draft of parser neural network model Model is good, but code is messy. Currently requires Chainer, which may cause the build to fail on machines without a GPU. Outline of the model: We first predict context-sensitive vectors for each word in the input: (embed_lower | embed_prefix | embed_suffix | embed_shape) >> Maxout(token_width) >> convolution ** 4 This convolutional layer is shared between the tagger and the parser. This prevents the parser from needing tag features. To boost the representation, we make a "super tag" with POS, morphology and dependency label. The tagger predicts this by adding a softmax layer onto the convolutional layer --- so, we're teaching the convolutional layer to give us a representation that's one affine transform from this informative lexical information. This is obviously good for the parser (which backprops to the convolutions too). The parser model makes a state vector by concatenating the vector representations for its context tokens. Current results suggest few context tokens works well. Maybe this is a bug. The current context tokens: * S0, S1, S2: Top three words on the stack * B0, B1: First two words of the buffer * S0L1, S0L2: Leftmost and second leftmost children of S0 * S0R1, S0R2: Rightmost and second rightmost children of S0 * S1L1, S1L2, S1R2, S1R, B0L1, B0L2: Likewise for S1 and B0 This makes the state vector quite long: 13*T, where T is the token vector width (128 is working well). Fortunately, there's a way to structure the computation to save some expense (and make it more GPU friendly). The parser typically visits 2*N states for a sentence of length N (although it may visit more, if it back-tracks with a non-monotonic transition). A naive implementation would require 2*N (B, 13*T) @ (13*T, H) matrix multiplications for a batch of size B. We can instead perform one (B*N, T) @ (T, 13*H) multiplication, to pre-compute the hidden weights for each positional feature wrt the words in the batch. (Note that our token vectors come from the CNN -- so we can't play this trick over the vocabulary. That's how Stanford's NN parser works --- and why its model is so big.) This pre-computation strategy allows a nice compromise between GPU-friendliness and implementation simplicity. The CNN and the wide lower layer are computed on the GPU, and then the precomputed hidden weights are moved to the CPU, before we start the transition-based parsing process. This makes a lot of things much easier. We don't have to worry about variable-length batch sizes, and we don't have to implement the dynamic oracle in CUDA to train. Currently the parser's loss function is multilabel log loss, as the dynamic oracle allows multiple states to be 0 cost. This is defined as: (exp(score) / Z) - (exp(score) / gZ) Where gZ is the sum of the scores assigned to gold classes. I'm very interested in regressing on the cost directly, but so far this isn't working well. Machinery is in place for beam-search, which has been working well for the linear model. Beam search should benefit greatly from the pre-computation trick.
2017-05-13 00:09:15 +03:00
from .gold cimport GoldParse
from thinc.api import add, layerize, chain, clone, concatenate
from thinc.neural import Model, Maxout, Softmax, Affine
from thinc.neural._classes.hash_embed import HashEmbed
from thinc.neural.util import to_categorical
from thinc.neural._classes.convolution import ExtractWindow
from thinc.neural._classes.resnet import Residual
from thinc.neural._classes.batchnorm import BatchNorm as BN
from .attrs import ID, LOWER, PREFIX, SUFFIX, SHAPE, TAG, DEP
from ._ml import flatten, get_col, doc2feats
class TokenVectorEncoder(object):
'''Assign position-sensitive vectors to tokens, using a CNN or RNN.'''
Update draft of parser neural network model Model is good, but code is messy. Currently requires Chainer, which may cause the build to fail on machines without a GPU. Outline of the model: We first predict context-sensitive vectors for each word in the input: (embed_lower | embed_prefix | embed_suffix | embed_shape) >> Maxout(token_width) >> convolution ** 4 This convolutional layer is shared between the tagger and the parser. This prevents the parser from needing tag features. To boost the representation, we make a "super tag" with POS, morphology and dependency label. The tagger predicts this by adding a softmax layer onto the convolutional layer --- so, we're teaching the convolutional layer to give us a representation that's one affine transform from this informative lexical information. This is obviously good for the parser (which backprops to the convolutions too). The parser model makes a state vector by concatenating the vector representations for its context tokens. Current results suggest few context tokens works well. Maybe this is a bug. The current context tokens: * S0, S1, S2: Top three words on the stack * B0, B1: First two words of the buffer * S0L1, S0L2: Leftmost and second leftmost children of S0 * S0R1, S0R2: Rightmost and second rightmost children of S0 * S1L1, S1L2, S1R2, S1R, B0L1, B0L2: Likewise for S1 and B0 This makes the state vector quite long: 13*T, where T is the token vector width (128 is working well). Fortunately, there's a way to structure the computation to save some expense (and make it more GPU friendly). The parser typically visits 2*N states for a sentence of length N (although it may visit more, if it back-tracks with a non-monotonic transition). A naive implementation would require 2*N (B, 13*T) @ (13*T, H) matrix multiplications for a batch of size B. We can instead perform one (B*N, T) @ (T, 13*H) multiplication, to pre-compute the hidden weights for each positional feature wrt the words in the batch. (Note that our token vectors come from the CNN -- so we can't play this trick over the vocabulary. That's how Stanford's NN parser works --- and why its model is so big.) This pre-computation strategy allows a nice compromise between GPU-friendliness and implementation simplicity. The CNN and the wide lower layer are computed on the GPU, and then the precomputed hidden weights are moved to the CPU, before we start the transition-based parsing process. This makes a lot of things much easier. We don't have to worry about variable-length batch sizes, and we don't have to implement the dynamic oracle in CUDA to train. Currently the parser's loss function is multilabel log loss, as the dynamic oracle allows multiple states to be 0 cost. This is defined as: (exp(score) / Z) - (exp(score) / gZ) Where gZ is the sum of the scores assigned to gold classes. I'm very interested in regressing on the cost directly, but so far this isn't working well. Machinery is in place for beam-search, which has been working well for the linear model. Beam search should benefit greatly from the pre-computation trick.
2017-05-13 00:09:15 +03:00
def __init__(self, vocab, token_vector_width, **cfg):
self.vocab = vocab
Update draft of parser neural network model Model is good, but code is messy. Currently requires Chainer, which may cause the build to fail on machines without a GPU. Outline of the model: We first predict context-sensitive vectors for each word in the input: (embed_lower | embed_prefix | embed_suffix | embed_shape) >> Maxout(token_width) >> convolution ** 4 This convolutional layer is shared between the tagger and the parser. This prevents the parser from needing tag features. To boost the representation, we make a "super tag" with POS, morphology and dependency label. The tagger predicts this by adding a softmax layer onto the convolutional layer --- so, we're teaching the convolutional layer to give us a representation that's one affine transform from this informative lexical information. This is obviously good for the parser (which backprops to the convolutions too). The parser model makes a state vector by concatenating the vector representations for its context tokens. Current results suggest few context tokens works well. Maybe this is a bug. The current context tokens: * S0, S1, S2: Top three words on the stack * B0, B1: First two words of the buffer * S0L1, S0L2: Leftmost and second leftmost children of S0 * S0R1, S0R2: Rightmost and second rightmost children of S0 * S1L1, S1L2, S1R2, S1R, B0L1, B0L2: Likewise for S1 and B0 This makes the state vector quite long: 13*T, where T is the token vector width (128 is working well). Fortunately, there's a way to structure the computation to save some expense (and make it more GPU friendly). The parser typically visits 2*N states for a sentence of length N (although it may visit more, if it back-tracks with a non-monotonic transition). A naive implementation would require 2*N (B, 13*T) @ (13*T, H) matrix multiplications for a batch of size B. We can instead perform one (B*N, T) @ (T, 13*H) multiplication, to pre-compute the hidden weights for each positional feature wrt the words in the batch. (Note that our token vectors come from the CNN -- so we can't play this trick over the vocabulary. That's how Stanford's NN parser works --- and why its model is so big.) This pre-computation strategy allows a nice compromise between GPU-friendliness and implementation simplicity. The CNN and the wide lower layer are computed on the GPU, and then the precomputed hidden weights are moved to the CPU, before we start the transition-based parsing process. This makes a lot of things much easier. We don't have to worry about variable-length batch sizes, and we don't have to implement the dynamic oracle in CUDA to train. Currently the parser's loss function is multilabel log loss, as the dynamic oracle allows multiple states to be 0 cost. This is defined as: (exp(score) / Z) - (exp(score) / gZ) Where gZ is the sum of the scores assigned to gold classes. I'm very interested in regressing on the cost directly, but so far this isn't working well. Machinery is in place for beam-search, which has been working well for the linear model. Beam search should benefit greatly from the pre-computation trick.
2017-05-13 00:09:15 +03:00
self.doc2feats = doc2feats()
self.model = self.build_model(vocab.lang, token_vector_width, **cfg)
self.tagger = chain(
self.model,
Update draft of parser neural network model Model is good, but code is messy. Currently requires Chainer, which may cause the build to fail on machines without a GPU. Outline of the model: We first predict context-sensitive vectors for each word in the input: (embed_lower | embed_prefix | embed_suffix | embed_shape) >> Maxout(token_width) >> convolution ** 4 This convolutional layer is shared between the tagger and the parser. This prevents the parser from needing tag features. To boost the representation, we make a "super tag" with POS, morphology and dependency label. The tagger predicts this by adding a softmax layer onto the convolutional layer --- so, we're teaching the convolutional layer to give us a representation that's one affine transform from this informative lexical information. This is obviously good for the parser (which backprops to the convolutions too). The parser model makes a state vector by concatenating the vector representations for its context tokens. Current results suggest few context tokens works well. Maybe this is a bug. The current context tokens: * S0, S1, S2: Top three words on the stack * B0, B1: First two words of the buffer * S0L1, S0L2: Leftmost and second leftmost children of S0 * S0R1, S0R2: Rightmost and second rightmost children of S0 * S1L1, S1L2, S1R2, S1R, B0L1, B0L2: Likewise for S1 and B0 This makes the state vector quite long: 13*T, where T is the token vector width (128 is working well). Fortunately, there's a way to structure the computation to save some expense (and make it more GPU friendly). The parser typically visits 2*N states for a sentence of length N (although it may visit more, if it back-tracks with a non-monotonic transition). A naive implementation would require 2*N (B, 13*T) @ (13*T, H) matrix multiplications for a batch of size B. We can instead perform one (B*N, T) @ (T, 13*H) multiplication, to pre-compute the hidden weights for each positional feature wrt the words in the batch. (Note that our token vectors come from the CNN -- so we can't play this trick over the vocabulary. That's how Stanford's NN parser works --- and why its model is so big.) This pre-computation strategy allows a nice compromise between GPU-friendliness and implementation simplicity. The CNN and the wide lower layer are computed on the GPU, and then the precomputed hidden weights are moved to the CPU, before we start the transition-based parsing process. This makes a lot of things much easier. We don't have to worry about variable-length batch sizes, and we don't have to implement the dynamic oracle in CUDA to train. Currently the parser's loss function is multilabel log loss, as the dynamic oracle allows multiple states to be 0 cost. This is defined as: (exp(score) / Z) - (exp(score) / gZ) Where gZ is the sum of the scores assigned to gold classes. I'm very interested in regressing on the cost directly, but so far this isn't working well. Machinery is in place for beam-search, which has been working well for the linear model. Beam search should benefit greatly from the pre-computation trick.
2017-05-13 00:09:15 +03:00
Softmax(self.vocab.morphology.n_tags,
token_vector_width))
2017-05-14 01:20:23 +03:00
def build_model(self, lang, width, embed_size=5000, **cfg):
Update draft of parser neural network model Model is good, but code is messy. Currently requires Chainer, which may cause the build to fail on machines without a GPU. Outline of the model: We first predict context-sensitive vectors for each word in the input: (embed_lower | embed_prefix | embed_suffix | embed_shape) >> Maxout(token_width) >> convolution ** 4 This convolutional layer is shared between the tagger and the parser. This prevents the parser from needing tag features. To boost the representation, we make a "super tag" with POS, morphology and dependency label. The tagger predicts this by adding a softmax layer onto the convolutional layer --- so, we're teaching the convolutional layer to give us a representation that's one affine transform from this informative lexical information. This is obviously good for the parser (which backprops to the convolutions too). The parser model makes a state vector by concatenating the vector representations for its context tokens. Current results suggest few context tokens works well. Maybe this is a bug. The current context tokens: * S0, S1, S2: Top three words on the stack * B0, B1: First two words of the buffer * S0L1, S0L2: Leftmost and second leftmost children of S0 * S0R1, S0R2: Rightmost and second rightmost children of S0 * S1L1, S1L2, S1R2, S1R, B0L1, B0L2: Likewise for S1 and B0 This makes the state vector quite long: 13*T, where T is the token vector width (128 is working well). Fortunately, there's a way to structure the computation to save some expense (and make it more GPU friendly). The parser typically visits 2*N states for a sentence of length N (although it may visit more, if it back-tracks with a non-monotonic transition). A naive implementation would require 2*N (B, 13*T) @ (13*T, H) matrix multiplications for a batch of size B. We can instead perform one (B*N, T) @ (T, 13*H) multiplication, to pre-compute the hidden weights for each positional feature wrt the words in the batch. (Note that our token vectors come from the CNN -- so we can't play this trick over the vocabulary. That's how Stanford's NN parser works --- and why its model is so big.) This pre-computation strategy allows a nice compromise between GPU-friendliness and implementation simplicity. The CNN and the wide lower layer are computed on the GPU, and then the precomputed hidden weights are moved to the CPU, before we start the transition-based parsing process. This makes a lot of things much easier. We don't have to worry about variable-length batch sizes, and we don't have to implement the dynamic oracle in CUDA to train. Currently the parser's loss function is multilabel log loss, as the dynamic oracle allows multiple states to be 0 cost. This is defined as: (exp(score) / Z) - (exp(score) / gZ) Where gZ is the sum of the scores assigned to gold classes. I'm very interested in regressing on the cost directly, but so far this isn't working well. Machinery is in place for beam-search, which has been working well for the linear model. Beam search should benefit greatly from the pre-computation trick.
2017-05-13 00:09:15 +03:00
cols = self.doc2feats.cols
with Model.define_operators({'>>': chain, '|': concatenate, '**': clone, '+': add}):
2017-05-14 01:20:23 +03:00
lower = get_col(cols.index(LOWER)) >> (HashEmbed(width, embed_size)
+HashEmbed(width, embed_size))
prefix = get_col(cols.index(PREFIX)) >> HashEmbed(width, embed_size//2)
suffix = get_col(cols.index(SUFFIX)) >> HashEmbed(width, embed_size//2)
shape = get_col(cols.index(SHAPE)) >> HashEmbed(width, embed_size//2)
Update draft of parser neural network model Model is good, but code is messy. Currently requires Chainer, which may cause the build to fail on machines without a GPU. Outline of the model: We first predict context-sensitive vectors for each word in the input: (embed_lower | embed_prefix | embed_suffix | embed_shape) >> Maxout(token_width) >> convolution ** 4 This convolutional layer is shared between the tagger and the parser. This prevents the parser from needing tag features. To boost the representation, we make a "super tag" with POS, morphology and dependency label. The tagger predicts this by adding a softmax layer onto the convolutional layer --- so, we're teaching the convolutional layer to give us a representation that's one affine transform from this informative lexical information. This is obviously good for the parser (which backprops to the convolutions too). The parser model makes a state vector by concatenating the vector representations for its context tokens. Current results suggest few context tokens works well. Maybe this is a bug. The current context tokens: * S0, S1, S2: Top three words on the stack * B0, B1: First two words of the buffer * S0L1, S0L2: Leftmost and second leftmost children of S0 * S0R1, S0R2: Rightmost and second rightmost children of S0 * S1L1, S1L2, S1R2, S1R, B0L1, B0L2: Likewise for S1 and B0 This makes the state vector quite long: 13*T, where T is the token vector width (128 is working well). Fortunately, there's a way to structure the computation to save some expense (and make it more GPU friendly). The parser typically visits 2*N states for a sentence of length N (although it may visit more, if it back-tracks with a non-monotonic transition). A naive implementation would require 2*N (B, 13*T) @ (13*T, H) matrix multiplications for a batch of size B. We can instead perform one (B*N, T) @ (T, 13*H) multiplication, to pre-compute the hidden weights for each positional feature wrt the words in the batch. (Note that our token vectors come from the CNN -- so we can't play this trick over the vocabulary. That's how Stanford's NN parser works --- and why its model is so big.) This pre-computation strategy allows a nice compromise between GPU-friendliness and implementation simplicity. The CNN and the wide lower layer are computed on the GPU, and then the precomputed hidden weights are moved to the CPU, before we start the transition-based parsing process. This makes a lot of things much easier. We don't have to worry about variable-length batch sizes, and we don't have to implement the dynamic oracle in CUDA to train. Currently the parser's loss function is multilabel log loss, as the dynamic oracle allows multiple states to be 0 cost. This is defined as: (exp(score) / Z) - (exp(score) / gZ) Where gZ is the sum of the scores assigned to gold classes. I'm very interested in regressing on the cost directly, but so far this isn't working well. Machinery is in place for beam-search, which has been working well for the linear model. Beam search should benefit greatly from the pre-computation trick.
2017-05-13 00:09:15 +03:00
tok2vec = (
flatten
>> (lower | prefix | suffix | shape )
2017-05-14 01:20:23 +03:00
>> Maxout(width, pieces=3)
>> Residual(ExtractWindow(nW=1) >> Maxout(width, width*3))
>> Residual(ExtractWindow(nW=1) >> Maxout(width, width*3))
>> Residual(ExtractWindow(nW=1) >> Maxout(width, width*3))
>> Residual(ExtractWindow(nW=1) >> Maxout(width, width*3))
Update draft of parser neural network model Model is good, but code is messy. Currently requires Chainer, which may cause the build to fail on machines without a GPU. Outline of the model: We first predict context-sensitive vectors for each word in the input: (embed_lower | embed_prefix | embed_suffix | embed_shape) >> Maxout(token_width) >> convolution ** 4 This convolutional layer is shared between the tagger and the parser. This prevents the parser from needing tag features. To boost the representation, we make a "super tag" with POS, morphology and dependency label. The tagger predicts this by adding a softmax layer onto the convolutional layer --- so, we're teaching the convolutional layer to give us a representation that's one affine transform from this informative lexical information. This is obviously good for the parser (which backprops to the convolutions too). The parser model makes a state vector by concatenating the vector representations for its context tokens. Current results suggest few context tokens works well. Maybe this is a bug. The current context tokens: * S0, S1, S2: Top three words on the stack * B0, B1: First two words of the buffer * S0L1, S0L2: Leftmost and second leftmost children of S0 * S0R1, S0R2: Rightmost and second rightmost children of S0 * S1L1, S1L2, S1R2, S1R, B0L1, B0L2: Likewise for S1 and B0 This makes the state vector quite long: 13*T, where T is the token vector width (128 is working well). Fortunately, there's a way to structure the computation to save some expense (and make it more GPU friendly). The parser typically visits 2*N states for a sentence of length N (although it may visit more, if it back-tracks with a non-monotonic transition). A naive implementation would require 2*N (B, 13*T) @ (13*T, H) matrix multiplications for a batch of size B. We can instead perform one (B*N, T) @ (T, 13*H) multiplication, to pre-compute the hidden weights for each positional feature wrt the words in the batch. (Note that our token vectors come from the CNN -- so we can't play this trick over the vocabulary. That's how Stanford's NN parser works --- and why its model is so big.) This pre-computation strategy allows a nice compromise between GPU-friendliness and implementation simplicity. The CNN and the wide lower layer are computed on the GPU, and then the precomputed hidden weights are moved to the CPU, before we start the transition-based parsing process. This makes a lot of things much easier. We don't have to worry about variable-length batch sizes, and we don't have to implement the dynamic oracle in CUDA to train. Currently the parser's loss function is multilabel log loss, as the dynamic oracle allows multiple states to be 0 cost. This is defined as: (exp(score) / Z) - (exp(score) / gZ) Where gZ is the sum of the scores assigned to gold classes. I'm very interested in regressing on the cost directly, but so far this isn't working well. Machinery is in place for beam-search, which has been working well for the linear model. Beam search should benefit greatly from the pre-computation trick.
2017-05-13 00:09:15 +03:00
)
return tok2vec
def pipe(self, docs):
docs = list(docs)
self.predict_tags(docs)
for doc in docs:
yield doc
def __call__(self, doc):
2017-05-08 15:53:45 +03:00
self.predict_tags([doc])
Update draft of parser neural network model Model is good, but code is messy. Currently requires Chainer, which may cause the build to fail on machines without a GPU. Outline of the model: We first predict context-sensitive vectors for each word in the input: (embed_lower | embed_prefix | embed_suffix | embed_shape) >> Maxout(token_width) >> convolution ** 4 This convolutional layer is shared between the tagger and the parser. This prevents the parser from needing tag features. To boost the representation, we make a "super tag" with POS, morphology and dependency label. The tagger predicts this by adding a softmax layer onto the convolutional layer --- so, we're teaching the convolutional layer to give us a representation that's one affine transform from this informative lexical information. This is obviously good for the parser (which backprops to the convolutions too). The parser model makes a state vector by concatenating the vector representations for its context tokens. Current results suggest few context tokens works well. Maybe this is a bug. The current context tokens: * S0, S1, S2: Top three words on the stack * B0, B1: First two words of the buffer * S0L1, S0L2: Leftmost and second leftmost children of S0 * S0R1, S0R2: Rightmost and second rightmost children of S0 * S1L1, S1L2, S1R2, S1R, B0L1, B0L2: Likewise for S1 and B0 This makes the state vector quite long: 13*T, where T is the token vector width (128 is working well). Fortunately, there's a way to structure the computation to save some expense (and make it more GPU friendly). The parser typically visits 2*N states for a sentence of length N (although it may visit more, if it back-tracks with a non-monotonic transition). A naive implementation would require 2*N (B, 13*T) @ (13*T, H) matrix multiplications for a batch of size B. We can instead perform one (B*N, T) @ (T, 13*H) multiplication, to pre-compute the hidden weights for each positional feature wrt the words in the batch. (Note that our token vectors come from the CNN -- so we can't play this trick over the vocabulary. That's how Stanford's NN parser works --- and why its model is so big.) This pre-computation strategy allows a nice compromise between GPU-friendliness and implementation simplicity. The CNN and the wide lower layer are computed on the GPU, and then the precomputed hidden weights are moved to the CPU, before we start the transition-based parsing process. This makes a lot of things much easier. We don't have to worry about variable-length batch sizes, and we don't have to implement the dynamic oracle in CUDA to train. Currently the parser's loss function is multilabel log loss, as the dynamic oracle allows multiple states to be 0 cost. This is defined as: (exp(score) / Z) - (exp(score) / gZ) Where gZ is the sum of the scores assigned to gold classes. I'm very interested in regressing on the cost directly, but so far this isn't working well. Machinery is in place for beam-search, which has been working well for the linear model. Beam search should benefit greatly from the pre-computation trick.
2017-05-13 00:09:15 +03:00
def begin_update(self, feats, drop=0.):
tokvecs, bp_tokvecs = self.model.begin_update(feats, drop=drop)
return tokvecs, bp_tokvecs
2017-05-08 15:53:45 +03:00
def predict_tags(self, docs, drop=0.):
cdef Doc doc
Update draft of parser neural network model Model is good, but code is messy. Currently requires Chainer, which may cause the build to fail on machines without a GPU. Outline of the model: We first predict context-sensitive vectors for each word in the input: (embed_lower | embed_prefix | embed_suffix | embed_shape) >> Maxout(token_width) >> convolution ** 4 This convolutional layer is shared between the tagger and the parser. This prevents the parser from needing tag features. To boost the representation, we make a "super tag" with POS, morphology and dependency label. The tagger predicts this by adding a softmax layer onto the convolutional layer --- so, we're teaching the convolutional layer to give us a representation that's one affine transform from this informative lexical information. This is obviously good for the parser (which backprops to the convolutions too). The parser model makes a state vector by concatenating the vector representations for its context tokens. Current results suggest few context tokens works well. Maybe this is a bug. The current context tokens: * S0, S1, S2: Top three words on the stack * B0, B1: First two words of the buffer * S0L1, S0L2: Leftmost and second leftmost children of S0 * S0R1, S0R2: Rightmost and second rightmost children of S0 * S1L1, S1L2, S1R2, S1R, B0L1, B0L2: Likewise for S1 and B0 This makes the state vector quite long: 13*T, where T is the token vector width (128 is working well). Fortunately, there's a way to structure the computation to save some expense (and make it more GPU friendly). The parser typically visits 2*N states for a sentence of length N (although it may visit more, if it back-tracks with a non-monotonic transition). A naive implementation would require 2*N (B, 13*T) @ (13*T, H) matrix multiplications for a batch of size B. We can instead perform one (B*N, T) @ (T, 13*H) multiplication, to pre-compute the hidden weights for each positional feature wrt the words in the batch. (Note that our token vectors come from the CNN -- so we can't play this trick over the vocabulary. That's how Stanford's NN parser works --- and why its model is so big.) This pre-computation strategy allows a nice compromise between GPU-friendliness and implementation simplicity. The CNN and the wide lower layer are computed on the GPU, and then the precomputed hidden weights are moved to the CPU, before we start the transition-based parsing process. This makes a lot of things much easier. We don't have to worry about variable-length batch sizes, and we don't have to implement the dynamic oracle in CUDA to train. Currently the parser's loss function is multilabel log loss, as the dynamic oracle allows multiple states to be 0 cost. This is defined as: (exp(score) / Z) - (exp(score) / gZ) Where gZ is the sum of the scores assigned to gold classes. I'm very interested in regressing on the cost directly, but so far this isn't working well. Machinery is in place for beam-search, which has been working well for the linear model. Beam search should benefit greatly from the pre-computation trick.
2017-05-13 00:09:15 +03:00
feats = self.doc2feats(docs)
scores, finish_update = self.tagger.begin_update(feats, drop=drop)
scores, _ = self.tagger.begin_update(feats, drop=drop)
2017-05-08 15:53:45 +03:00
idx = 0
2017-05-14 01:20:23 +03:00
guesses = scores.argmax(axis=1)
if not isinstance(guesses, numpy.ndarray):
guesses = guesses.get()
2017-05-08 15:53:45 +03:00
for i, doc in enumerate(docs):
Update draft of parser neural network model Model is good, but code is messy. Currently requires Chainer, which may cause the build to fail on machines without a GPU. Outline of the model: We first predict context-sensitive vectors for each word in the input: (embed_lower | embed_prefix | embed_suffix | embed_shape) >> Maxout(token_width) >> convolution ** 4 This convolutional layer is shared between the tagger and the parser. This prevents the parser from needing tag features. To boost the representation, we make a "super tag" with POS, morphology and dependency label. The tagger predicts this by adding a softmax layer onto the convolutional layer --- so, we're teaching the convolutional layer to give us a representation that's one affine transform from this informative lexical information. This is obviously good for the parser (which backprops to the convolutions too). The parser model makes a state vector by concatenating the vector representations for its context tokens. Current results suggest few context tokens works well. Maybe this is a bug. The current context tokens: * S0, S1, S2: Top three words on the stack * B0, B1: First two words of the buffer * S0L1, S0L2: Leftmost and second leftmost children of S0 * S0R1, S0R2: Rightmost and second rightmost children of S0 * S1L1, S1L2, S1R2, S1R, B0L1, B0L2: Likewise for S1 and B0 This makes the state vector quite long: 13*T, where T is the token vector width (128 is working well). Fortunately, there's a way to structure the computation to save some expense (and make it more GPU friendly). The parser typically visits 2*N states for a sentence of length N (although it may visit more, if it back-tracks with a non-monotonic transition). A naive implementation would require 2*N (B, 13*T) @ (13*T, H) matrix multiplications for a batch of size B. We can instead perform one (B*N, T) @ (T, 13*H) multiplication, to pre-compute the hidden weights for each positional feature wrt the words in the batch. (Note that our token vectors come from the CNN -- so we can't play this trick over the vocabulary. That's how Stanford's NN parser works --- and why its model is so big.) This pre-computation strategy allows a nice compromise between GPU-friendliness and implementation simplicity. The CNN and the wide lower layer are computed on the GPU, and then the precomputed hidden weights are moved to the CPU, before we start the transition-based parsing process. This makes a lot of things much easier. We don't have to worry about variable-length batch sizes, and we don't have to implement the dynamic oracle in CUDA to train. Currently the parser's loss function is multilabel log loss, as the dynamic oracle allows multiple states to be 0 cost. This is defined as: (exp(score) / Z) - (exp(score) / gZ) Where gZ is the sum of the scores assigned to gold classes. I'm very interested in regressing on the cost directly, but so far this isn't working well. Machinery is in place for beam-search, which has been working well for the linear model. Beam search should benefit greatly from the pre-computation trick.
2017-05-13 00:09:15 +03:00
tag_ids = guesses[idx:idx+len(doc)]
2017-05-08 15:53:45 +03:00
for j, tag_id in enumerate(tag_ids):
doc.vocab.morphology.assign_tag_id(&doc.c[j], tag_id)
idx += 1
Update draft of parser neural network model Model is good, but code is messy. Currently requires Chainer, which may cause the build to fail on machines without a GPU. Outline of the model: We first predict context-sensitive vectors for each word in the input: (embed_lower | embed_prefix | embed_suffix | embed_shape) >> Maxout(token_width) >> convolution ** 4 This convolutional layer is shared between the tagger and the parser. This prevents the parser from needing tag features. To boost the representation, we make a "super tag" with POS, morphology and dependency label. The tagger predicts this by adding a softmax layer onto the convolutional layer --- so, we're teaching the convolutional layer to give us a representation that's one affine transform from this informative lexical information. This is obviously good for the parser (which backprops to the convolutions too). The parser model makes a state vector by concatenating the vector representations for its context tokens. Current results suggest few context tokens works well. Maybe this is a bug. The current context tokens: * S0, S1, S2: Top three words on the stack * B0, B1: First two words of the buffer * S0L1, S0L2: Leftmost and second leftmost children of S0 * S0R1, S0R2: Rightmost and second rightmost children of S0 * S1L1, S1L2, S1R2, S1R, B0L1, B0L2: Likewise for S1 and B0 This makes the state vector quite long: 13*T, where T is the token vector width (128 is working well). Fortunately, there's a way to structure the computation to save some expense (and make it more GPU friendly). The parser typically visits 2*N states for a sentence of length N (although it may visit more, if it back-tracks with a non-monotonic transition). A naive implementation would require 2*N (B, 13*T) @ (13*T, H) matrix multiplications for a batch of size B. We can instead perform one (B*N, T) @ (T, 13*H) multiplication, to pre-compute the hidden weights for each positional feature wrt the words in the batch. (Note that our token vectors come from the CNN -- so we can't play this trick over the vocabulary. That's how Stanford's NN parser works --- and why its model is so big.) This pre-computation strategy allows a nice compromise between GPU-friendliness and implementation simplicity. The CNN and the wide lower layer are computed on the GPU, and then the precomputed hidden weights are moved to the CPU, before we start the transition-based parsing process. This makes a lot of things much easier. We don't have to worry about variable-length batch sizes, and we don't have to implement the dynamic oracle in CUDA to train. Currently the parser's loss function is multilabel log loss, as the dynamic oracle allows multiple states to be 0 cost. This is defined as: (exp(score) / Z) - (exp(score) / gZ) Where gZ is the sum of the scores assigned to gold classes. I'm very interested in regressing on the cost directly, but so far this isn't working well. Machinery is in place for beam-search, which has been working well for the linear model. Beam search should benefit greatly from the pre-computation trick.
2017-05-13 00:09:15 +03:00
def update(self, docs_feats, golds, drop=0., sgd=None):
cdef int i, j, idx
cdef GoldParse gold
docs, feats = docs_feats
scores, finish_update = self.tagger.begin_update(feats, drop=drop)
tag_index = {tag: i for i, tag in enumerate(docs[0].vocab.morphology.tag_names)}
idx = 0
Update draft of parser neural network model Model is good, but code is messy. Currently requires Chainer, which may cause the build to fail on machines without a GPU. Outline of the model: We first predict context-sensitive vectors for each word in the input: (embed_lower | embed_prefix | embed_suffix | embed_shape) >> Maxout(token_width) >> convolution ** 4 This convolutional layer is shared between the tagger and the parser. This prevents the parser from needing tag features. To boost the representation, we make a "super tag" with POS, morphology and dependency label. The tagger predicts this by adding a softmax layer onto the convolutional layer --- so, we're teaching the convolutional layer to give us a representation that's one affine transform from this informative lexical information. This is obviously good for the parser (which backprops to the convolutions too). The parser model makes a state vector by concatenating the vector representations for its context tokens. Current results suggest few context tokens works well. Maybe this is a bug. The current context tokens: * S0, S1, S2: Top three words on the stack * B0, B1: First two words of the buffer * S0L1, S0L2: Leftmost and second leftmost children of S0 * S0R1, S0R2: Rightmost and second rightmost children of S0 * S1L1, S1L2, S1R2, S1R, B0L1, B0L2: Likewise for S1 and B0 This makes the state vector quite long: 13*T, where T is the token vector width (128 is working well). Fortunately, there's a way to structure the computation to save some expense (and make it more GPU friendly). The parser typically visits 2*N states for a sentence of length N (although it may visit more, if it back-tracks with a non-monotonic transition). A naive implementation would require 2*N (B, 13*T) @ (13*T, H) matrix multiplications for a batch of size B. We can instead perform one (B*N, T) @ (T, 13*H) multiplication, to pre-compute the hidden weights for each positional feature wrt the words in the batch. (Note that our token vectors come from the CNN -- so we can't play this trick over the vocabulary. That's how Stanford's NN parser works --- and why its model is so big.) This pre-computation strategy allows a nice compromise between GPU-friendliness and implementation simplicity. The CNN and the wide lower layer are computed on the GPU, and then the precomputed hidden weights are moved to the CPU, before we start the transition-based parsing process. This makes a lot of things much easier. We don't have to worry about variable-length batch sizes, and we don't have to implement the dynamic oracle in CUDA to train. Currently the parser's loss function is multilabel log loss, as the dynamic oracle allows multiple states to be 0 cost. This is defined as: (exp(score) / Z) - (exp(score) / gZ) Where gZ is the sum of the scores assigned to gold classes. I'm very interested in regressing on the cost directly, but so far this isn't working well. Machinery is in place for beam-search, which has been working well for the linear model. Beam search should benefit greatly from the pre-computation trick.
2017-05-13 00:09:15 +03:00
correct = numpy.zeros((scores.shape[0],), dtype='i')
for gold in golds:
for tag in gold.tags:
correct[idx] = tag_index[tag]
idx += 1
correct = self.model.ops.xp.array(correct)
d_scores = scores - to_categorical(correct, nb_classes=scores.shape[1])
finish_update(d_scores, sgd)
cdef class EntityRecognizer(Parser):
"""
Annotate named entities on Doc objects.
"""
TransitionSystem = BiluoPushDown
2017-03-11 16:00:20 +03:00
feature_templates = get_feature_templates('ner')
def add_label(self, label):
Parser.add_label(self, label)
if isinstance(label, basestring):
label = self.vocab.strings[label]
2017-03-15 17:27:41 +03:00
cdef class BeamEntityRecognizer(BeamParser):
"""
Annotate named entities on Doc objects.
"""
2017-03-15 17:27:41 +03:00
TransitionSystem = BiluoPushDown
feature_templates = get_feature_templates('ner')
2017-03-15 17:27:41 +03:00
def add_label(self, label):
Parser.add_label(self, label)
2017-03-15 17:27:41 +03:00
if isinstance(label, basestring):
label = self.vocab.strings[label]
2017-03-11 20:11:30 +03:00
cdef class DependencyParser(Parser):
TransitionSystem = ArcEager
feature_templates = get_feature_templates('basic')
def add_label(self, label):
Parser.add_label(self, label)
if isinstance(label, basestring):
label = self.vocab.strings[label]
2017-03-15 17:27:41 +03:00
cdef class BeamDependencyParser(BeamParser):
TransitionSystem = ArcEager
feature_templates = get_feature_templates('basic')
def add_label(self, label):
Parser.add_label(self, label)
2017-03-15 17:27:41 +03:00
if isinstance(label, basestring):
label = self.vocab.strings[label]
__all__ = ['Tagger', 'DependencyParser', 'EntityRecognizer', 'BeamDependencyParser',
'BeamEntityRecognizer', 'TokenVectorEnoder']