spaCy/spacy/_ml.py

281 lines
8.6 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

2017-05-06 21:38:12 +03:00
from thinc.api import add, layerize, chain, clone, concatenate, with_flatten
Update draft of parser neural network model Model is good, but code is messy. Currently requires Chainer, which may cause the build to fail on machines without a GPU. Outline of the model: We first predict context-sensitive vectors for each word in the input: (embed_lower | embed_prefix | embed_suffix | embed_shape) >> Maxout(token_width) >> convolution ** 4 This convolutional layer is shared between the tagger and the parser. This prevents the parser from needing tag features. To boost the representation, we make a "super tag" with POS, morphology and dependency label. The tagger predicts this by adding a softmax layer onto the convolutional layer --- so, we're teaching the convolutional layer to give us a representation that's one affine transform from this informative lexical information. This is obviously good for the parser (which backprops to the convolutions too). The parser model makes a state vector by concatenating the vector representations for its context tokens. Current results suggest few context tokens works well. Maybe this is a bug. The current context tokens: * S0, S1, S2: Top three words on the stack * B0, B1: First two words of the buffer * S0L1, S0L2: Leftmost and second leftmost children of S0 * S0R1, S0R2: Rightmost and second rightmost children of S0 * S1L1, S1L2, S1R2, S1R, B0L1, B0L2: Likewise for S1 and B0 This makes the state vector quite long: 13*T, where T is the token vector width (128 is working well). Fortunately, there's a way to structure the computation to save some expense (and make it more GPU friendly). The parser typically visits 2*N states for a sentence of length N (although it may visit more, if it back-tracks with a non-monotonic transition). A naive implementation would require 2*N (B, 13*T) @ (13*T, H) matrix multiplications for a batch of size B. We can instead perform one (B*N, T) @ (T, 13*H) multiplication, to pre-compute the hidden weights for each positional feature wrt the words in the batch. (Note that our token vectors come from the CNN -- so we can't play this trick over the vocabulary. That's how Stanford's NN parser works --- and why its model is so big.) This pre-computation strategy allows a nice compromise between GPU-friendliness and implementation simplicity. The CNN and the wide lower layer are computed on the GPU, and then the precomputed hidden weights are moved to the CPU, before we start the transition-based parsing process. This makes a lot of things much easier. We don't have to worry about variable-length batch sizes, and we don't have to implement the dynamic oracle in CUDA to train. Currently the parser's loss function is multilabel log loss, as the dynamic oracle allows multiple states to be 0 cost. This is defined as: (exp(score) / Z) - (exp(score) / gZ) Where gZ is the sum of the scores assigned to gold classes. I'm very interested in regressing on the cost directly, but so far this isn't working well. Machinery is in place for beam-search, which has been working well for the linear model. Beam search should benefit greatly from the pre-computation trick.
2017-05-13 00:09:15 +03:00
from thinc.neural import Model, Maxout, Softmax, Affine
2017-05-04 14:31:40 +03:00
from thinc.neural._classes.hash_embed import HashEmbed
Update draft of parser neural network model Model is good, but code is messy. Currently requires Chainer, which may cause the build to fail on machines without a GPU. Outline of the model: We first predict context-sensitive vectors for each word in the input: (embed_lower | embed_prefix | embed_suffix | embed_shape) >> Maxout(token_width) >> convolution ** 4 This convolutional layer is shared between the tagger and the parser. This prevents the parser from needing tag features. To boost the representation, we make a "super tag" with POS, morphology and dependency label. The tagger predicts this by adding a softmax layer onto the convolutional layer --- so, we're teaching the convolutional layer to give us a representation that's one affine transform from this informative lexical information. This is obviously good for the parser (which backprops to the convolutions too). The parser model makes a state vector by concatenating the vector representations for its context tokens. Current results suggest few context tokens works well. Maybe this is a bug. The current context tokens: * S0, S1, S2: Top three words on the stack * B0, B1: First two words of the buffer * S0L1, S0L2: Leftmost and second leftmost children of S0 * S0R1, S0R2: Rightmost and second rightmost children of S0 * S1L1, S1L2, S1R2, S1R, B0L1, B0L2: Likewise for S1 and B0 This makes the state vector quite long: 13*T, where T is the token vector width (128 is working well). Fortunately, there's a way to structure the computation to save some expense (and make it more GPU friendly). The parser typically visits 2*N states for a sentence of length N (although it may visit more, if it back-tracks with a non-monotonic transition). A naive implementation would require 2*N (B, 13*T) @ (13*T, H) matrix multiplications for a batch of size B. We can instead perform one (B*N, T) @ (T, 13*H) multiplication, to pre-compute the hidden weights for each positional feature wrt the words in the batch. (Note that our token vectors come from the CNN -- so we can't play this trick over the vocabulary. That's how Stanford's NN parser works --- and why its model is so big.) This pre-computation strategy allows a nice compromise between GPU-friendliness and implementation simplicity. The CNN and the wide lower layer are computed on the GPU, and then the precomputed hidden weights are moved to the CPU, before we start the transition-based parsing process. This makes a lot of things much easier. We don't have to worry about variable-length batch sizes, and we don't have to implement the dynamic oracle in CUDA to train. Currently the parser's loss function is multilabel log loss, as the dynamic oracle allows multiple states to be 0 cost. This is defined as: (exp(score) / Z) - (exp(score) / gZ) Where gZ is the sum of the scores assigned to gold classes. I'm very interested in regressing on the cost directly, but so far this isn't working well. Machinery is in place for beam-search, which has been working well for the linear model. Beam search should benefit greatly from the pre-computation trick.
2017-05-13 00:09:15 +03:00
from thinc.neural.ops import NumpyOps, CupyOps
2017-05-05 21:12:03 +03:00
from thinc.neural._classes.convolution import ExtractWindow
from thinc.neural._classes.static_vectors import StaticVectors
2017-05-06 19:24:38 +03:00
from thinc.neural._classes.batchnorm import BatchNorm
2017-05-07 04:57:26 +03:00
from thinc.neural._classes.resnet import Residual
2017-05-21 17:07:56 +03:00
from thinc.neural import ReLu
2017-05-08 12:36:37 +03:00
from thinc import describe
from thinc.describe import Dimension, Synapses, Biases, Gradient
from thinc.neural._classes.affine import _set_dimensions_if_needed
2017-05-18 12:22:20 +03:00
2017-05-06 18:37:36 +03:00
from .attrs import ID, LOWER, PREFIX, SUFFIX, SHAPE, TAG, DEP
2017-05-18 12:22:20 +03:00
from .tokens.doc import Doc
2017-05-04 14:31:40 +03:00
2017-05-08 12:36:37 +03:00
import numpy
def _init_for_precomputed(W, ops):
if (W**2).sum() != 0.:
return
reshaped = W.reshape((W.shape[1], W.shape[0] * W.shape[2]))
ops.xavier_uniform_init(reshaped)
W[:] = reshaped.reshape(W.shape)
2017-05-08 12:36:37 +03:00
@describe.on_data(_set_dimensions_if_needed)
@describe.attributes(
nI=Dimension("Input size"),
nF=Dimension("Number of features"),
nO=Dimension("Output size"),
W=Synapses("Weights matrix",
lambda obj: (obj.nF, obj.nO, obj.nI),
lambda W, ops: _init_for_precomputed(W, ops)),
2017-05-08 12:36:37 +03:00
b=Biases("Bias vector",
lambda obj: (obj.nO,)),
d_W=Gradient("W"),
d_b=Gradient("b")
)
class PrecomputableAffine(Model):
def __init__(self, nO=None, nI=None, nF=None, **kwargs):
Model.__init__(self, **kwargs)
self.nO = nO
self.nI = nI
self.nF = nF
def begin_update(self, X, drop=0.):
# X: (b, i)
# Yf: (b, f, i)
2017-05-08 12:36:37 +03:00
# dY: (b, o)
# dYf: (b, f, o)
#Yf = numpy.einsum('bi,foi->bfo', X, self.W)
2017-05-08 12:36:37 +03:00
Yf = self.ops.xp.tensordot(
X, self.W, axes=[[1], [2]])
2017-05-08 12:36:37 +03:00
Yf += self.b
def backward(dY_ids, sgd=None):
tensordot = self.ops.xp.tensordot
2017-05-08 12:36:37 +03:00
dY, ids = dY_ids
Xf = X[ids]
#dXf = numpy.einsum('bo,foi->bfi', dY, self.W)
dXf = tensordot(dY, self.W, axes=[[1], [1]])
2017-05-08 12:36:37 +03:00
#dW = numpy.einsum('bo,bfi->ofi', dY, Xf)
dW = tensordot(dY, Xf, axes=[[0], [0]])
# ofi -> foi
self.d_W += dW.transpose((1, 0, 2))
self.d_b += dY.sum(axis=0)
2017-05-08 12:36:37 +03:00
if sgd is not None:
sgd(self._mem.weights, self._mem.gradient, key=self.id)
return dXf
return Yf, backward
2017-05-04 14:31:40 +03:00
2017-05-08 15:24:43 +03:00
@describe.on_data(_set_dimensions_if_needed)
@describe.attributes(
nI=Dimension("Input size"),
nF=Dimension("Number of features"),
nP=Dimension("Number of pieces"),
nO=Dimension("Output size"),
W=Synapses("Weights matrix",
lambda obj: (obj.nF, obj.nO, obj.nP, obj.nI),
lambda W, ops: ops.xavier_uniform_init(W)),
b=Biases("Bias vector",
lambda obj: (obj.nO, obj.nP)),
d_W=Gradient("W"),
d_b=Gradient("b")
)
class PrecomputableMaxouts(Model):
def __init__(self, nO=None, nI=None, nF=None, nP=3, **kwargs):
2017-05-08 15:24:43 +03:00
Model.__init__(self, **kwargs)
self.nO = nO
self.nP = nP
2017-05-08 15:24:43 +03:00
self.nI = nI
self.nF = nF
def begin_update(self, X, drop=0.):
# X: (b, i)
Update draft of parser neural network model Model is good, but code is messy. Currently requires Chainer, which may cause the build to fail on machines without a GPU. Outline of the model: We first predict context-sensitive vectors for each word in the input: (embed_lower | embed_prefix | embed_suffix | embed_shape) >> Maxout(token_width) >> convolution ** 4 This convolutional layer is shared between the tagger and the parser. This prevents the parser from needing tag features. To boost the representation, we make a "super tag" with POS, morphology and dependency label. The tagger predicts this by adding a softmax layer onto the convolutional layer --- so, we're teaching the convolutional layer to give us a representation that's one affine transform from this informative lexical information. This is obviously good for the parser (which backprops to the convolutions too). The parser model makes a state vector by concatenating the vector representations for its context tokens. Current results suggest few context tokens works well. Maybe this is a bug. The current context tokens: * S0, S1, S2: Top three words on the stack * B0, B1: First two words of the buffer * S0L1, S0L2: Leftmost and second leftmost children of S0 * S0R1, S0R2: Rightmost and second rightmost children of S0 * S1L1, S1L2, S1R2, S1R, B0L1, B0L2: Likewise for S1 and B0 This makes the state vector quite long: 13*T, where T is the token vector width (128 is working well). Fortunately, there's a way to structure the computation to save some expense (and make it more GPU friendly). The parser typically visits 2*N states for a sentence of length N (although it may visit more, if it back-tracks with a non-monotonic transition). A naive implementation would require 2*N (B, 13*T) @ (13*T, H) matrix multiplications for a batch of size B. We can instead perform one (B*N, T) @ (T, 13*H) multiplication, to pre-compute the hidden weights for each positional feature wrt the words in the batch. (Note that our token vectors come from the CNN -- so we can't play this trick over the vocabulary. That's how Stanford's NN parser works --- and why its model is so big.) This pre-computation strategy allows a nice compromise between GPU-friendliness and implementation simplicity. The CNN and the wide lower layer are computed on the GPU, and then the precomputed hidden weights are moved to the CPU, before we start the transition-based parsing process. This makes a lot of things much easier. We don't have to worry about variable-length batch sizes, and we don't have to implement the dynamic oracle in CUDA to train. Currently the parser's loss function is multilabel log loss, as the dynamic oracle allows multiple states to be 0 cost. This is defined as: (exp(score) / Z) - (exp(score) / gZ) Where gZ is the sum of the scores assigned to gold classes. I'm very interested in regressing on the cost directly, but so far this isn't working well. Machinery is in place for beam-search, which has been working well for the linear model. Beam search should benefit greatly from the pre-computation trick.
2017-05-13 00:09:15 +03:00
# Yfp: (b, f, o, p)
# Xf: (f, b, i)
2017-05-08 15:24:43 +03:00
# dYp: (b, o, p)
# W: (f, o, p, i)
# b: (o, p)
Update draft of parser neural network model Model is good, but code is messy. Currently requires Chainer, which may cause the build to fail on machines without a GPU. Outline of the model: We first predict context-sensitive vectors for each word in the input: (embed_lower | embed_prefix | embed_suffix | embed_shape) >> Maxout(token_width) >> convolution ** 4 This convolutional layer is shared between the tagger and the parser. This prevents the parser from needing tag features. To boost the representation, we make a "super tag" with POS, morphology and dependency label. The tagger predicts this by adding a softmax layer onto the convolutional layer --- so, we're teaching the convolutional layer to give us a representation that's one affine transform from this informative lexical information. This is obviously good for the parser (which backprops to the convolutions too). The parser model makes a state vector by concatenating the vector representations for its context tokens. Current results suggest few context tokens works well. Maybe this is a bug. The current context tokens: * S0, S1, S2: Top three words on the stack * B0, B1: First two words of the buffer * S0L1, S0L2: Leftmost and second leftmost children of S0 * S0R1, S0R2: Rightmost and second rightmost children of S0 * S1L1, S1L2, S1R2, S1R, B0L1, B0L2: Likewise for S1 and B0 This makes the state vector quite long: 13*T, where T is the token vector width (128 is working well). Fortunately, there's a way to structure the computation to save some expense (and make it more GPU friendly). The parser typically visits 2*N states for a sentence of length N (although it may visit more, if it back-tracks with a non-monotonic transition). A naive implementation would require 2*N (B, 13*T) @ (13*T, H) matrix multiplications for a batch of size B. We can instead perform one (B*N, T) @ (T, 13*H) multiplication, to pre-compute the hidden weights for each positional feature wrt the words in the batch. (Note that our token vectors come from the CNN -- so we can't play this trick over the vocabulary. That's how Stanford's NN parser works --- and why its model is so big.) This pre-computation strategy allows a nice compromise between GPU-friendliness and implementation simplicity. The CNN and the wide lower layer are computed on the GPU, and then the precomputed hidden weights are moved to the CPU, before we start the transition-based parsing process. This makes a lot of things much easier. We don't have to worry about variable-length batch sizes, and we don't have to implement the dynamic oracle in CUDA to train. Currently the parser's loss function is multilabel log loss, as the dynamic oracle allows multiple states to be 0 cost. This is defined as: (exp(score) / Z) - (exp(score) / gZ) Where gZ is the sum of the scores assigned to gold classes. I'm very interested in regressing on the cost directly, but so far this isn't working well. Machinery is in place for beam-search, which has been working well for the linear model. Beam search should benefit greatly from the pre-computation trick.
2017-05-13 00:09:15 +03:00
# bi,opfi->bfop
# bop,fopi->bfi
# bop,fbi->opfi : fopi
tensordot = self.ops.xp.tensordot
ascontiguous = self.ops.xp.ascontiguousarray
Yfp = tensordot(X, self.W, axes=[[1], [3]])
2017-05-08 15:24:43 +03:00
Yfp += self.b
Update draft of parser neural network model Model is good, but code is messy. Currently requires Chainer, which may cause the build to fail on machines without a GPU. Outline of the model: We first predict context-sensitive vectors for each word in the input: (embed_lower | embed_prefix | embed_suffix | embed_shape) >> Maxout(token_width) >> convolution ** 4 This convolutional layer is shared between the tagger and the parser. This prevents the parser from needing tag features. To boost the representation, we make a "super tag" with POS, morphology and dependency label. The tagger predicts this by adding a softmax layer onto the convolutional layer --- so, we're teaching the convolutional layer to give us a representation that's one affine transform from this informative lexical information. This is obviously good for the parser (which backprops to the convolutions too). The parser model makes a state vector by concatenating the vector representations for its context tokens. Current results suggest few context tokens works well. Maybe this is a bug. The current context tokens: * S0, S1, S2: Top three words on the stack * B0, B1: First two words of the buffer * S0L1, S0L2: Leftmost and second leftmost children of S0 * S0R1, S0R2: Rightmost and second rightmost children of S0 * S1L1, S1L2, S1R2, S1R, B0L1, B0L2: Likewise for S1 and B0 This makes the state vector quite long: 13*T, where T is the token vector width (128 is working well). Fortunately, there's a way to structure the computation to save some expense (and make it more GPU friendly). The parser typically visits 2*N states for a sentence of length N (although it may visit more, if it back-tracks with a non-monotonic transition). A naive implementation would require 2*N (B, 13*T) @ (13*T, H) matrix multiplications for a batch of size B. We can instead perform one (B*N, T) @ (T, 13*H) multiplication, to pre-compute the hidden weights for each positional feature wrt the words in the batch. (Note that our token vectors come from the CNN -- so we can't play this trick over the vocabulary. That's how Stanford's NN parser works --- and why its model is so big.) This pre-computation strategy allows a nice compromise between GPU-friendliness and implementation simplicity. The CNN and the wide lower layer are computed on the GPU, and then the precomputed hidden weights are moved to the CPU, before we start the transition-based parsing process. This makes a lot of things much easier. We don't have to worry about variable-length batch sizes, and we don't have to implement the dynamic oracle in CUDA to train. Currently the parser's loss function is multilabel log loss, as the dynamic oracle allows multiple states to be 0 cost. This is defined as: (exp(score) / Z) - (exp(score) / gZ) Where gZ is the sum of the scores assigned to gold classes. I'm very interested in regressing on the cost directly, but so far this isn't working well. Machinery is in place for beam-search, which has been working well for the linear model. Beam search should benefit greatly from the pre-computation trick.
2017-05-13 00:09:15 +03:00
def backward(dYp_ids, sgd=None):
dYp, ids = dYp_ids
2017-05-08 15:24:43 +03:00
Xf = X[ids]
Update draft of parser neural network model Model is good, but code is messy. Currently requires Chainer, which may cause the build to fail on machines without a GPU. Outline of the model: We first predict context-sensitive vectors for each word in the input: (embed_lower | embed_prefix | embed_suffix | embed_shape) >> Maxout(token_width) >> convolution ** 4 This convolutional layer is shared between the tagger and the parser. This prevents the parser from needing tag features. To boost the representation, we make a "super tag" with POS, morphology and dependency label. The tagger predicts this by adding a softmax layer onto the convolutional layer --- so, we're teaching the convolutional layer to give us a representation that's one affine transform from this informative lexical information. This is obviously good for the parser (which backprops to the convolutions too). The parser model makes a state vector by concatenating the vector representations for its context tokens. Current results suggest few context tokens works well. Maybe this is a bug. The current context tokens: * S0, S1, S2: Top three words on the stack * B0, B1: First two words of the buffer * S0L1, S0L2: Leftmost and second leftmost children of S0 * S0R1, S0R2: Rightmost and second rightmost children of S0 * S1L1, S1L2, S1R2, S1R, B0L1, B0L2: Likewise for S1 and B0 This makes the state vector quite long: 13*T, where T is the token vector width (128 is working well). Fortunately, there's a way to structure the computation to save some expense (and make it more GPU friendly). The parser typically visits 2*N states for a sentence of length N (although it may visit more, if it back-tracks with a non-monotonic transition). A naive implementation would require 2*N (B, 13*T) @ (13*T, H) matrix multiplications for a batch of size B. We can instead perform one (B*N, T) @ (T, 13*H) multiplication, to pre-compute the hidden weights for each positional feature wrt the words in the batch. (Note that our token vectors come from the CNN -- so we can't play this trick over the vocabulary. That's how Stanford's NN parser works --- and why its model is so big.) This pre-computation strategy allows a nice compromise between GPU-friendliness and implementation simplicity. The CNN and the wide lower layer are computed on the GPU, and then the precomputed hidden weights are moved to the CPU, before we start the transition-based parsing process. This makes a lot of things much easier. We don't have to worry about variable-length batch sizes, and we don't have to implement the dynamic oracle in CUDA to train. Currently the parser's loss function is multilabel log loss, as the dynamic oracle allows multiple states to be 0 cost. This is defined as: (exp(score) / Z) - (exp(score) / gZ) Where gZ is the sum of the scores assigned to gold classes. I'm very interested in regressing on the cost directly, but so far this isn't working well. Machinery is in place for beam-search, which has been working well for the linear model. Beam search should benefit greatly from the pre-computation trick.
2017-05-13 00:09:15 +03:00
dXf = tensordot(dYp, self.W, axes=[[1, 2], [1,2]])
dW = tensordot(dYp, Xf, axes=[[0], [0]])
2017-05-08 15:24:43 +03:00
Update draft of parser neural network model Model is good, but code is messy. Currently requires Chainer, which may cause the build to fail on machines without a GPU. Outline of the model: We first predict context-sensitive vectors for each word in the input: (embed_lower | embed_prefix | embed_suffix | embed_shape) >> Maxout(token_width) >> convolution ** 4 This convolutional layer is shared between the tagger and the parser. This prevents the parser from needing tag features. To boost the representation, we make a "super tag" with POS, morphology and dependency label. The tagger predicts this by adding a softmax layer onto the convolutional layer --- so, we're teaching the convolutional layer to give us a representation that's one affine transform from this informative lexical information. This is obviously good for the parser (which backprops to the convolutions too). The parser model makes a state vector by concatenating the vector representations for its context tokens. Current results suggest few context tokens works well. Maybe this is a bug. The current context tokens: * S0, S1, S2: Top three words on the stack * B0, B1: First two words of the buffer * S0L1, S0L2: Leftmost and second leftmost children of S0 * S0R1, S0R2: Rightmost and second rightmost children of S0 * S1L1, S1L2, S1R2, S1R, B0L1, B0L2: Likewise for S1 and B0 This makes the state vector quite long: 13*T, where T is the token vector width (128 is working well). Fortunately, there's a way to structure the computation to save some expense (and make it more GPU friendly). The parser typically visits 2*N states for a sentence of length N (although it may visit more, if it back-tracks with a non-monotonic transition). A naive implementation would require 2*N (B, 13*T) @ (13*T, H) matrix multiplications for a batch of size B. We can instead perform one (B*N, T) @ (T, 13*H) multiplication, to pre-compute the hidden weights for each positional feature wrt the words in the batch. (Note that our token vectors come from the CNN -- so we can't play this trick over the vocabulary. That's how Stanford's NN parser works --- and why its model is so big.) This pre-computation strategy allows a nice compromise between GPU-friendliness and implementation simplicity. The CNN and the wide lower layer are computed on the GPU, and then the precomputed hidden weights are moved to the CPU, before we start the transition-based parsing process. This makes a lot of things much easier. We don't have to worry about variable-length batch sizes, and we don't have to implement the dynamic oracle in CUDA to train. Currently the parser's loss function is multilabel log loss, as the dynamic oracle allows multiple states to be 0 cost. This is defined as: (exp(score) / Z) - (exp(score) / gZ) Where gZ is the sum of the scores assigned to gold classes. I'm very interested in regressing on the cost directly, but so far this isn't working well. Machinery is in place for beam-search, which has been working well for the linear model. Beam search should benefit greatly from the pre-computation trick.
2017-05-13 00:09:15 +03:00
self.d_W += dW.transpose((2, 0, 1, 3))
self.d_b += dYp.sum(axis=0)
2017-05-08 15:24:43 +03:00
if sgd is not None:
sgd(self._mem.weights, self._mem.gradient, key=self.id)
return dXf
Update draft of parser neural network model Model is good, but code is messy. Currently requires Chainer, which may cause the build to fail on machines without a GPU. Outline of the model: We first predict context-sensitive vectors for each word in the input: (embed_lower | embed_prefix | embed_suffix | embed_shape) >> Maxout(token_width) >> convolution ** 4 This convolutional layer is shared between the tagger and the parser. This prevents the parser from needing tag features. To boost the representation, we make a "super tag" with POS, morphology and dependency label. The tagger predicts this by adding a softmax layer onto the convolutional layer --- so, we're teaching the convolutional layer to give us a representation that's one affine transform from this informative lexical information. This is obviously good for the parser (which backprops to the convolutions too). The parser model makes a state vector by concatenating the vector representations for its context tokens. Current results suggest few context tokens works well. Maybe this is a bug. The current context tokens: * S0, S1, S2: Top three words on the stack * B0, B1: First two words of the buffer * S0L1, S0L2: Leftmost and second leftmost children of S0 * S0R1, S0R2: Rightmost and second rightmost children of S0 * S1L1, S1L2, S1R2, S1R, B0L1, B0L2: Likewise for S1 and B0 This makes the state vector quite long: 13*T, where T is the token vector width (128 is working well). Fortunately, there's a way to structure the computation to save some expense (and make it more GPU friendly). The parser typically visits 2*N states for a sentence of length N (although it may visit more, if it back-tracks with a non-monotonic transition). A naive implementation would require 2*N (B, 13*T) @ (13*T, H) matrix multiplications for a batch of size B. We can instead perform one (B*N, T) @ (T, 13*H) multiplication, to pre-compute the hidden weights for each positional feature wrt the words in the batch. (Note that our token vectors come from the CNN -- so we can't play this trick over the vocabulary. That's how Stanford's NN parser works --- and why its model is so big.) This pre-computation strategy allows a nice compromise between GPU-friendliness and implementation simplicity. The CNN and the wide lower layer are computed on the GPU, and then the precomputed hidden weights are moved to the CPU, before we start the transition-based parsing process. This makes a lot of things much easier. We don't have to worry about variable-length batch sizes, and we don't have to implement the dynamic oracle in CUDA to train. Currently the parser's loss function is multilabel log loss, as the dynamic oracle allows multiple states to be 0 cost. This is defined as: (exp(score) / Z) - (exp(score) / gZ) Where gZ is the sum of the scores assigned to gold classes. I'm very interested in regressing on the cost directly, but so far this isn't working well. Machinery is in place for beam-search, which has been working well for the linear model. Beam search should benefit greatly from the pre-computation trick.
2017-05-13 00:09:15 +03:00
return Yfp, backward
2017-05-08 15:24:43 +03:00
def Tok2Vec(width, embed_size, preprocess=None):
cols = [ID, LOWER, PREFIX, SUFFIX, SHAPE]
with Model.define_operators({'>>': chain, '|': concatenate, '**': clone, '+': add}):
lower = get_col(cols.index(LOWER)) >> HashEmbed(width, embed_size)
prefix = get_col(cols.index(PREFIX)) >> HashEmbed(width, embed_size//2)
suffix = get_col(cols.index(SUFFIX)) >> HashEmbed(width, embed_size//2)
shape = get_col(cols.index(SHAPE)) >> HashEmbed(width, embed_size//2)
tok2vec = (
with_flatten(
asarray(Model.ops, dtype='uint64')
>> (lower | prefix | suffix | shape )
>> Maxout(width, width*4, pieces=3)
>> Residual(ExtractWindow(nW=1) >> Maxout(width, width*3))
>> Residual(ExtractWindow(nW=1) >> Maxout(width, width*3))
>> Residual(ExtractWindow(nW=1) >> Maxout(width, width*3))
>> Residual(ExtractWindow(nW=1) >> Maxout(width, width*3)),
pad=4, ndim=5)
)
if preprocess not in (False, None):
tok2vec = preprocess >> tok2vec
# Work around thinc API limitations :(. TODO: Revise in Thinc 7
tok2vec.nO = width
return tok2vec
2017-05-04 14:31:40 +03:00
def asarray(ops, dtype):
def forward(X, drop=0.):
return ops.asarray(X, dtype=dtype), None
return layerize(forward)
def foreach(layer):
def forward(Xs, drop=0.):
results = []
backprops = []
for X in Xs:
result, bp = layer.begin_update(X, drop=drop)
results.append(result)
backprops.append(bp)
def backward(d_results, sgd=None):
dXs = []
for d_result, backprop in zip(d_results, backprops):
dXs.append(backprop(d_result, sgd))
return dXs
return results, backward
model = layerize(forward)
model._layers.append(layer)
return model
def rebatch(size, layer):
ops = layer.ops
def forward(X, drop=0.):
if X.shape[0] < size:
return layer.begin_update(X)
parts = _divide_array(X, size)
results, bp_results = zip(*[layer.begin_update(p, drop=drop)
for p in parts])
y = ops.flatten(results)
def backward(dy, sgd=None):
d_parts = [bp(y, sgd=sgd) for bp, y in
zip(bp_results, _divide_array(dy, size))]
try:
dX = ops.flatten(d_parts)
except TypeError:
dX = None
except ValueError:
dX = None
return dX
return y, backward
model = layerize(forward)
model._layers.append(layer)
return model
def _divide_array(X, size):
parts = []
index = 0
while index < len(X):
parts.append(X[index : index + size])
index += size
return parts
2017-05-04 14:31:40 +03:00
def get_col(idx):
assert idx >= 0, idx
2017-05-04 14:31:40 +03:00
def forward(X, drop=0.):
assert idx >= 0, idx
Update draft of parser neural network model Model is good, but code is messy. Currently requires Chainer, which may cause the build to fail on machines without a GPU. Outline of the model: We first predict context-sensitive vectors for each word in the input: (embed_lower | embed_prefix | embed_suffix | embed_shape) >> Maxout(token_width) >> convolution ** 4 This convolutional layer is shared between the tagger and the parser. This prevents the parser from needing tag features. To boost the representation, we make a "super tag" with POS, morphology and dependency label. The tagger predicts this by adding a softmax layer onto the convolutional layer --- so, we're teaching the convolutional layer to give us a representation that's one affine transform from this informative lexical information. This is obviously good for the parser (which backprops to the convolutions too). The parser model makes a state vector by concatenating the vector representations for its context tokens. Current results suggest few context tokens works well. Maybe this is a bug. The current context tokens: * S0, S1, S2: Top three words on the stack * B0, B1: First two words of the buffer * S0L1, S0L2: Leftmost and second leftmost children of S0 * S0R1, S0R2: Rightmost and second rightmost children of S0 * S1L1, S1L2, S1R2, S1R, B0L1, B0L2: Likewise for S1 and B0 This makes the state vector quite long: 13*T, where T is the token vector width (128 is working well). Fortunately, there's a way to structure the computation to save some expense (and make it more GPU friendly). The parser typically visits 2*N states for a sentence of length N (although it may visit more, if it back-tracks with a non-monotonic transition). A naive implementation would require 2*N (B, 13*T) @ (13*T, H) matrix multiplications for a batch of size B. We can instead perform one (B*N, T) @ (T, 13*H) multiplication, to pre-compute the hidden weights for each positional feature wrt the words in the batch. (Note that our token vectors come from the CNN -- so we can't play this trick over the vocabulary. That's how Stanford's NN parser works --- and why its model is so big.) This pre-computation strategy allows a nice compromise between GPU-friendliness and implementation simplicity. The CNN and the wide lower layer are computed on the GPU, and then the precomputed hidden weights are moved to the CPU, before we start the transition-based parsing process. This makes a lot of things much easier. We don't have to worry about variable-length batch sizes, and we don't have to implement the dynamic oracle in CUDA to train. Currently the parser's loss function is multilabel log loss, as the dynamic oracle allows multiple states to be 0 cost. This is defined as: (exp(score) / Z) - (exp(score) / gZ) Where gZ is the sum of the scores assigned to gold classes. I'm very interested in regressing on the cost directly, but so far this isn't working well. Machinery is in place for beam-search, which has been working well for the linear model. Beam search should benefit greatly from the pre-computation trick.
2017-05-13 00:09:15 +03:00
if isinstance(X, numpy.ndarray):
ops = NumpyOps()
else:
ops = CupyOps()
output = ops.xp.ascontiguousarray(X[:, idx], dtype=X.dtype)
2017-05-06 21:38:12 +03:00
def backward(y, sgd=None):
assert idx >= 0, idx
Update draft of parser neural network model Model is good, but code is messy. Currently requires Chainer, which may cause the build to fail on machines without a GPU. Outline of the model: We first predict context-sensitive vectors for each word in the input: (embed_lower | embed_prefix | embed_suffix | embed_shape) >> Maxout(token_width) >> convolution ** 4 This convolutional layer is shared between the tagger and the parser. This prevents the parser from needing tag features. To boost the representation, we make a "super tag" with POS, morphology and dependency label. The tagger predicts this by adding a softmax layer onto the convolutional layer --- so, we're teaching the convolutional layer to give us a representation that's one affine transform from this informative lexical information. This is obviously good for the parser (which backprops to the convolutions too). The parser model makes a state vector by concatenating the vector representations for its context tokens. Current results suggest few context tokens works well. Maybe this is a bug. The current context tokens: * S0, S1, S2: Top three words on the stack * B0, B1: First two words of the buffer * S0L1, S0L2: Leftmost and second leftmost children of S0 * S0R1, S0R2: Rightmost and second rightmost children of S0 * S1L1, S1L2, S1R2, S1R, B0L1, B0L2: Likewise for S1 and B0 This makes the state vector quite long: 13*T, where T is the token vector width (128 is working well). Fortunately, there's a way to structure the computation to save some expense (and make it more GPU friendly). The parser typically visits 2*N states for a sentence of length N (although it may visit more, if it back-tracks with a non-monotonic transition). A naive implementation would require 2*N (B, 13*T) @ (13*T, H) matrix multiplications for a batch of size B. We can instead perform one (B*N, T) @ (T, 13*H) multiplication, to pre-compute the hidden weights for each positional feature wrt the words in the batch. (Note that our token vectors come from the CNN -- so we can't play this trick over the vocabulary. That's how Stanford's NN parser works --- and why its model is so big.) This pre-computation strategy allows a nice compromise between GPU-friendliness and implementation simplicity. The CNN and the wide lower layer are computed on the GPU, and then the precomputed hidden weights are moved to the CPU, before we start the transition-based parsing process. This makes a lot of things much easier. We don't have to worry about variable-length batch sizes, and we don't have to implement the dynamic oracle in CUDA to train. Currently the parser's loss function is multilabel log loss, as the dynamic oracle allows multiple states to be 0 cost. This is defined as: (exp(score) / Z) - (exp(score) / gZ) Where gZ is the sum of the scores assigned to gold classes. I'm very interested in regressing on the cost directly, but so far this isn't working well. Machinery is in place for beam-search, which has been working well for the linear model. Beam search should benefit greatly from the pre-computation trick.
2017-05-13 00:09:15 +03:00
dX = ops.allocate(X.shape)
2017-05-06 21:38:12 +03:00
dX[:, idx] += y
return dX
return output, backward
2017-05-04 14:31:40 +03:00
return layerize(forward)
Update draft of parser neural network model Model is good, but code is messy. Currently requires Chainer, which may cause the build to fail on machines without a GPU. Outline of the model: We first predict context-sensitive vectors for each word in the input: (embed_lower | embed_prefix | embed_suffix | embed_shape) >> Maxout(token_width) >> convolution ** 4 This convolutional layer is shared between the tagger and the parser. This prevents the parser from needing tag features. To boost the representation, we make a "super tag" with POS, morphology and dependency label. The tagger predicts this by adding a softmax layer onto the convolutional layer --- so, we're teaching the convolutional layer to give us a representation that's one affine transform from this informative lexical information. This is obviously good for the parser (which backprops to the convolutions too). The parser model makes a state vector by concatenating the vector representations for its context tokens. Current results suggest few context tokens works well. Maybe this is a bug. The current context tokens: * S0, S1, S2: Top three words on the stack * B0, B1: First two words of the buffer * S0L1, S0L2: Leftmost and second leftmost children of S0 * S0R1, S0R2: Rightmost and second rightmost children of S0 * S1L1, S1L2, S1R2, S1R, B0L1, B0L2: Likewise for S1 and B0 This makes the state vector quite long: 13*T, where T is the token vector width (128 is working well). Fortunately, there's a way to structure the computation to save some expense (and make it more GPU friendly). The parser typically visits 2*N states for a sentence of length N (although it may visit more, if it back-tracks with a non-monotonic transition). A naive implementation would require 2*N (B, 13*T) @ (13*T, H) matrix multiplications for a batch of size B. We can instead perform one (B*N, T) @ (T, 13*H) multiplication, to pre-compute the hidden weights for each positional feature wrt the words in the batch. (Note that our token vectors come from the CNN -- so we can't play this trick over the vocabulary. That's how Stanford's NN parser works --- and why its model is so big.) This pre-computation strategy allows a nice compromise between GPU-friendliness and implementation simplicity. The CNN and the wide lower layer are computed on the GPU, and then the precomputed hidden weights are moved to the CPU, before we start the transition-based parsing process. This makes a lot of things much easier. We don't have to worry about variable-length batch sizes, and we don't have to implement the dynamic oracle in CUDA to train. Currently the parser's loss function is multilabel log loss, as the dynamic oracle allows multiple states to be 0 cost. This is defined as: (exp(score) / Z) - (exp(score) / gZ) Where gZ is the sum of the scores assigned to gold classes. I'm very interested in regressing on the cost directly, but so far this isn't working well. Machinery is in place for beam-search, which has been working well for the linear model. Beam search should benefit greatly from the pre-computation trick.
2017-05-13 00:09:15 +03:00
def zero_init(model):
def _hook(self, X, y=None):
self.W.fill(0)
model.on_data_hooks.append(_hook)
return model
def doc2feats(cols=None):
2017-05-08 16:29:36 +03:00
cols = [ID, LOWER, PREFIX, SUFFIX, SHAPE]
def forward(docs, drop=0.):
2017-05-18 12:22:20 +03:00
feats = []
for doc in docs:
feats.append(doc.to_array(cols))
return feats, None
2017-05-06 17:47:15 +03:00
model = layerize(forward)
Update draft of parser neural network model Model is good, but code is messy. Currently requires Chainer, which may cause the build to fail on machines without a GPU. Outline of the model: We first predict context-sensitive vectors for each word in the input: (embed_lower | embed_prefix | embed_suffix | embed_shape) >> Maxout(token_width) >> convolution ** 4 This convolutional layer is shared between the tagger and the parser. This prevents the parser from needing tag features. To boost the representation, we make a "super tag" with POS, morphology and dependency label. The tagger predicts this by adding a softmax layer onto the convolutional layer --- so, we're teaching the convolutional layer to give us a representation that's one affine transform from this informative lexical information. This is obviously good for the parser (which backprops to the convolutions too). The parser model makes a state vector by concatenating the vector representations for its context tokens. Current results suggest few context tokens works well. Maybe this is a bug. The current context tokens: * S0, S1, S2: Top three words on the stack * B0, B1: First two words of the buffer * S0L1, S0L2: Leftmost and second leftmost children of S0 * S0R1, S0R2: Rightmost and second rightmost children of S0 * S1L1, S1L2, S1R2, S1R, B0L1, B0L2: Likewise for S1 and B0 This makes the state vector quite long: 13*T, where T is the token vector width (128 is working well). Fortunately, there's a way to structure the computation to save some expense (and make it more GPU friendly). The parser typically visits 2*N states for a sentence of length N (although it may visit more, if it back-tracks with a non-monotonic transition). A naive implementation would require 2*N (B, 13*T) @ (13*T, H) matrix multiplications for a batch of size B. We can instead perform one (B*N, T) @ (T, 13*H) multiplication, to pre-compute the hidden weights for each positional feature wrt the words in the batch. (Note that our token vectors come from the CNN -- so we can't play this trick over the vocabulary. That's how Stanford's NN parser works --- and why its model is so big.) This pre-computation strategy allows a nice compromise between GPU-friendliness and implementation simplicity. The CNN and the wide lower layer are computed on the GPU, and then the precomputed hidden weights are moved to the CPU, before we start the transition-based parsing process. This makes a lot of things much easier. We don't have to worry about variable-length batch sizes, and we don't have to implement the dynamic oracle in CUDA to train. Currently the parser's loss function is multilabel log loss, as the dynamic oracle allows multiple states to be 0 cost. This is defined as: (exp(score) / Z) - (exp(score) / gZ) Where gZ is the sum of the scores assigned to gold classes. I'm very interested in regressing on the cost directly, but so far this isn't working well. Machinery is in place for beam-search, which has been working well for the linear model. Beam search should benefit greatly from the pre-computation trick.
2017-05-13 00:09:15 +03:00
model.cols = cols
2017-05-06 17:47:15 +03:00
return model
2017-05-06 21:38:12 +03:00
def print_shape(prefix):
def forward(X, drop=0.):
return X, lambda dX, **kwargs: dX
return layerize(forward)
2017-05-07 04:57:26 +03:00
2017-05-06 21:38:12 +03:00
@layerize
def get_token_vectors(tokens_attrs_vectors, drop=0.):
ops = Model.ops
tokens, attrs, vectors = tokens_attrs_vectors
def backward(d_output, sgd=None):
return (tokens, d_output)
return vectors, backward
@layerize
def flatten(seqs, drop=0.):
Update draft of parser neural network model Model is good, but code is messy. Currently requires Chainer, which may cause the build to fail on machines without a GPU. Outline of the model: We first predict context-sensitive vectors for each word in the input: (embed_lower | embed_prefix | embed_suffix | embed_shape) >> Maxout(token_width) >> convolution ** 4 This convolutional layer is shared between the tagger and the parser. This prevents the parser from needing tag features. To boost the representation, we make a "super tag" with POS, morphology and dependency label. The tagger predicts this by adding a softmax layer onto the convolutional layer --- so, we're teaching the convolutional layer to give us a representation that's one affine transform from this informative lexical information. This is obviously good for the parser (which backprops to the convolutions too). The parser model makes a state vector by concatenating the vector representations for its context tokens. Current results suggest few context tokens works well. Maybe this is a bug. The current context tokens: * S0, S1, S2: Top three words on the stack * B0, B1: First two words of the buffer * S0L1, S0L2: Leftmost and second leftmost children of S0 * S0R1, S0R2: Rightmost and second rightmost children of S0 * S1L1, S1L2, S1R2, S1R, B0L1, B0L2: Likewise for S1 and B0 This makes the state vector quite long: 13*T, where T is the token vector width (128 is working well). Fortunately, there's a way to structure the computation to save some expense (and make it more GPU friendly). The parser typically visits 2*N states for a sentence of length N (although it may visit more, if it back-tracks with a non-monotonic transition). A naive implementation would require 2*N (B, 13*T) @ (13*T, H) matrix multiplications for a batch of size B. We can instead perform one (B*N, T) @ (T, 13*H) multiplication, to pre-compute the hidden weights for each positional feature wrt the words in the batch. (Note that our token vectors come from the CNN -- so we can't play this trick over the vocabulary. That's how Stanford's NN parser works --- and why its model is so big.) This pre-computation strategy allows a nice compromise between GPU-friendliness and implementation simplicity. The CNN and the wide lower layer are computed on the GPU, and then the precomputed hidden weights are moved to the CPU, before we start the transition-based parsing process. This makes a lot of things much easier. We don't have to worry about variable-length batch sizes, and we don't have to implement the dynamic oracle in CUDA to train. Currently the parser's loss function is multilabel log loss, as the dynamic oracle allows multiple states to be 0 cost. This is defined as: (exp(score) / Z) - (exp(score) / gZ) Where gZ is the sum of the scores assigned to gold classes. I'm very interested in regressing on the cost directly, but so far this isn't working well. Machinery is in place for beam-search, which has been working well for the linear model. Beam search should benefit greatly from the pre-computation trick.
2017-05-13 00:09:15 +03:00
if isinstance(seqs[0], numpy.ndarray):
ops = NumpyOps()
elif hasattr(CupyOps.xp, 'ndarray') and isinstance(seqs[0], CupyOps.xp.ndarray):
Update draft of parser neural network model Model is good, but code is messy. Currently requires Chainer, which may cause the build to fail on machines without a GPU. Outline of the model: We first predict context-sensitive vectors for each word in the input: (embed_lower | embed_prefix | embed_suffix | embed_shape) >> Maxout(token_width) >> convolution ** 4 This convolutional layer is shared between the tagger and the parser. This prevents the parser from needing tag features. To boost the representation, we make a "super tag" with POS, morphology and dependency label. The tagger predicts this by adding a softmax layer onto the convolutional layer --- so, we're teaching the convolutional layer to give us a representation that's one affine transform from this informative lexical information. This is obviously good for the parser (which backprops to the convolutions too). The parser model makes a state vector by concatenating the vector representations for its context tokens. Current results suggest few context tokens works well. Maybe this is a bug. The current context tokens: * S0, S1, S2: Top three words on the stack * B0, B1: First two words of the buffer * S0L1, S0L2: Leftmost and second leftmost children of S0 * S0R1, S0R2: Rightmost and second rightmost children of S0 * S1L1, S1L2, S1R2, S1R, B0L1, B0L2: Likewise for S1 and B0 This makes the state vector quite long: 13*T, where T is the token vector width (128 is working well). Fortunately, there's a way to structure the computation to save some expense (and make it more GPU friendly). The parser typically visits 2*N states for a sentence of length N (although it may visit more, if it back-tracks with a non-monotonic transition). A naive implementation would require 2*N (B, 13*T) @ (13*T, H) matrix multiplications for a batch of size B. We can instead perform one (B*N, T) @ (T, 13*H) multiplication, to pre-compute the hidden weights for each positional feature wrt the words in the batch. (Note that our token vectors come from the CNN -- so we can't play this trick over the vocabulary. That's how Stanford's NN parser works --- and why its model is so big.) This pre-computation strategy allows a nice compromise between GPU-friendliness and implementation simplicity. The CNN and the wide lower layer are computed on the GPU, and then the precomputed hidden weights are moved to the CPU, before we start the transition-based parsing process. This makes a lot of things much easier. We don't have to worry about variable-length batch sizes, and we don't have to implement the dynamic oracle in CUDA to train. Currently the parser's loss function is multilabel log loss, as the dynamic oracle allows multiple states to be 0 cost. This is defined as: (exp(score) / Z) - (exp(score) / gZ) Where gZ is the sum of the scores assigned to gold classes. I'm very interested in regressing on the cost directly, but so far this isn't working well. Machinery is in place for beam-search, which has been working well for the linear model. Beam search should benefit greatly from the pre-computation trick.
2017-05-13 00:09:15 +03:00
ops = CupyOps()
else:
raise ValueError("Unable to flatten sequence of type %s" % type(seqs[0]))
2017-05-07 04:57:26 +03:00
lengths = [len(seq) for seq in seqs]
def finish_update(d_X, sgd=None):
2017-05-07 04:57:26 +03:00
return ops.unflatten(d_X, lengths)
X = ops.xp.vstack(seqs)
return X, finish_update